88-1666 wHi7e — cirr CLERK COI1f1C1I /
PIN'v� - F'I�NANCE GITY OF SAI�NT PALTL �(��
CAMIARV - OEPAR*TMEN 7 "� � ,
91.UE — MAVOR File NO. �
� � ouncil esolution �
,, , �� f,f;
�,_�:.
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS , Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc. made application
to the Planning Commission for special condition use permits
for the purpose of establishing community residential facilities
at 386 Duke Street (Lot 7 , Block 3 , Stinson & Ramsey' s Subdivision
of the West one-half of Block 16, Stinson, Brown & Ramsey' s
Addition to St. Paul ) , 383 Colborne Street (Lot 19 and the south
26 and 8/12 feet of Lot 20, Block 3, Stinson and Ramsey' s sub-
division of the west one half of Block 16 of Stinson, Brown and
Ramsey' s Addition to St. Paul) and 397 Colborne Street (Lot 16,
Block 3 , Stinson & Ramsey' s subdivision of the west one half
of Block 16 of Stinson, Brown & Ramsey' s Rddition to St. Paul ) ,
all in the City of Saint Paul , pursuant to the provisions of
Section 60.423 ; and
WHEREAS , following a public hearing with notice to affected
property owners conducted by the Zoning Committee, the Planning
� Commission by its resolution number 88-63 , adopted August 26 ,
1988 , denied the application for special condition use permit
because the properties did not meet the requirements for the
conditional use permit as set forth in the Zoning Code, based
upon the following findings made by said Commission:
1 . Familystyle of St. Paul operates 24 separate community � �
residential facilities, basically converted houses,
serving a total of 175 residents in roughly a two block
area bounded by Jefferson to the north, Colborne to
the east, Palace to the south and Erie to the west.
2. Twenty-one of these facilities were established prior
to the adoption of the community residential facilities
zoning ordinance in 1979 and are considered legal non-
conforming with respect to the special conditions
imposed on such facilities.
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Dimond
Lo� In Favor
���
Rettman
Scheibel A gai n s t BY
Sonnen
Wilson
Form Ap ved by City Atto ey
Adopted by Councii: Date
(
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �
sy�
A►pproved by Mavor: Date Ap ro ed by Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY
. � � � � . . �f�-/d��
. ,
3. In 1983 �amily��yle of St. Paul reque�ted a special
condition use permit to e�tablish these three facilities in
que�tion. The Planning Commission unanimously denied the permit�
because the facilities could not meet the 1 ,320 feet spacing
requirement of the Code. Thi� decision was then appealed to the
City Cquncil and the Council rever�ed the Planning Commission and
granted the permit subject to five conditions, including the
conditian that upon the implementation of the dispersal law
(Chapter 157, Laws of 1984) , the city may revnke the permits for
the properties or if the dispersal law has not been implemented
by October 1 , 1988, the special condition use permits for the
subject properties would terminat� as of Octnber 1 , 1988.
4. The Ram�ey County dispersal plan contained a provision that
the County would develop with Familystyle by December 1 , 1985 a
specific plan for the �r,�se-out/aispersal no later than October
1 , 1988, for programs located at 383 Colborne, 397 Colborne and
368 Duke, and no progress has been made to implement this plan.
7herefore the conditional use permit for these properties issued
by the City Council is to terminat� as o-F October 1 , 1988.
5. The proposed three cammunity residential fiacilitie� are
lncated within 1320 feet of other such facilities, and the
Planning Commission has con�idered the applicant's request that
the Commission modify this special condition in accordance with
the provisions of section 64.300 (d) . 7his section provides that
the ComrniJJion may modi�y any or al1 special conditions when
striat application of such special conditions would unreasonably
limit or prevent otherwise lawful u�e of a piece of property or
an existing structure and would result in exceptional undue
hardship to the awner of Wuch property or structure; provided,
that such modificatian will not impair the intent and purpose of
�uch special conditian and is con�istent with health, maral� and
general welfare of the community and is consistent with the
reasonable enjoyment of adjacent property.
6. The structureW in question were originally con�tructed as
one and two family residences and the applicant ha� not
demonstrated that it is unreasonable to convert them back to a
conforming use.
7. The intent of the di�tance requirement between community
facilities is to avoid the concentratinn of thes� type� of
facilities in a neighborhood. The State of Minnesota has
determined that a planning district is over-concentrated if one-
half of one percent of the di�trict 's population reside� in a
treatment facility.
8. The subject community facilities are located in Planning
Aistrict 9 and thiJ �ZJtriat has over three percent af it� total
population of the diWtrict living in licensed community
residential facilities. Neighborhood concentration is a
. - j � .� � � � ��-��6�
. ,
detriment to facility residents as well , who retain an
institutional rather than a community based envirnnment.
7here�ore to modify the condition does nnt meet the intent of the
zoning code.
9. The intent nf the City Council was to give the applicant
sufficient time (five years) to make necessary arrangements to
avoid both displacement of their clients and financial hardship.
10. That strict application of the special condition would not
unreasonably limit or prevent ntherwise lawful use of a piece of
property or an exi�ting structure, wnuld not re�ult in
exceptional undue hardship to the owner of the property or
structure, and such modificatinn will impair the intent and
purpo�e ofi such special condition and is inconsistent with the
health, morals and general welfare of the community and the
enjoyment of the adjacent property.
Whereas, Pursuant to the provision� of the Zoning Code
F'amilystyle of St. Paul duly filed its appeal from the determination
made by the Planning Gommisuian, requesting that a hearing be held
befor� the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions
taken by the said Commission; and
Whereas, Acting pursuant to sections 64 .205 through 6Q.208, and
upon notice to appellant and other affected property owners, public
hearings were held on �eptember 27th and October 4th, 1988 where all
intere�ted parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and
Whereas, Pursuant to sectinn 54.206 the City Council 's review of
decisions of the Planning Commissinn is to d�termine whether the
Commission committed an error in any fact, pracedure or finding, and
in such cases the Council may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or
modify, the decision or determination appealed from; and
Whereas, 7he Council , having heard the stataments made, and
having considered the appeal , the report of staff , the minutes and
findings nf the Planning Commi�sion, daes hereby
WHITiE - C�TV CLERK
PINK� - ri11QANCE G I TY OF SA I NT PAU L Council G
BLUERY - MAVORTMENT File NO• �`� ���� -
� � • Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul does
hereby find and determine that the Planning Commission did not
commit any error in its findings and conclusions, that the Council
does hereby concur in the findings and conclusions made by the
Comm'ission, and therefore, the decision of the Planning Commission
is hereby affirmed in its entirety; and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appeal of Familystyle of St.
Paul , Inc. is hereby denied; and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc. may
continue the use of the community residential facilities at 386
Duke Street, 383 and 397 Colborne Street until January 31 , 1989 ,
and shall discontinue such use from and after February 1 , 1989 ;
and, be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall mail a copy
of this resolution to Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc. , the Zoning
Administrator and the Planning Commission.
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Dimond
�� [n Favor
Goswitz
Rettman '�
�� _ A gainst BY
Sonnen
Wilson
�G''j' � A ,ggp Form Appr e by City At rney
Adopted by Council: Date O
r
Certified Pa s d Council Se ary BY ,
gy, l
��CT ' '� � ;
A►pp e by dllavor: _ Appro ed Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY
�� 0 C 1 2 �: 1988
. � r ,����� �
. , i�° 012778
� � - - - - - -
. DEPARTMENT • �
CONTACT NAME
PHONE ;
� DATE
.
�.SSIGN NUMBER FO& BOIJTING ORDER: (See reverse side.) '
� �
_ Department Director _ Zlaqor (or Assista�it)
_ Finance wnd I�anagement Services Director _ City Clerk
_ Budget Director _ �
_ City Attorney _
- � TOTAL NUMBBR OF SIGNAT[TItE PAGES; (Clip all locations for signature.) E '°
, ,
W Y T ? (PurposefRat�onale)
'u �c.��'� . � � -����� af d�``. a,ww/T�,�, _ c�,c( c�•,��,� �
�$�a� C,�,N,a�+T•oiu w'� sr+K►''�'' �n� ,3� C G�«r�+ic�t+t:tt A�.t'•'.I:,�.�,ay/
-�,� r.7��r .�- 3Ffi. � �c, 3'�3 � 3q 7 !'o l b•� — �
t
�,�r��t It,�.j�l �c�'c��sr ��� ,��I�!' ?
; �
�
�OST/BENEFIT. BUDGETARY. AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: !
i
Cou�csl Research Center � �
Ut�I O '� �J8� ;
� i �
FINANCING SOURCE ADiD BUDGET ACTIV�TY NUMBER CHARGBD OR CREDITED: ;
(Mayor•s signature. not required if utzder $10,000.)
Total Amount of Trans�ction: Activity Number:
" � N
Funding Source: , �
3
I
�
ATTAGHMENTS: (List and number all attachments.) !
;
�
s
t
AD1riINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES , � `
i
_Yes _No Rules, Regulations, Procedures., or Budget Amendment required?
_Yes _No If yes� are they or timetable attached? ` �
1�EPARTMENT REVIEW �TY ATTORNEY REVI$W �
. • ;�
_Yes ,`_No Council resolution required? Resolution required? _Y$s _No
Yes No Insur�nce required? Insurance sufficient? _Y�s _No
Yes No Insurance attached? �
w� � ' � �����
ST. PAUL CITY COUNCII. ��� �� ��
� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
ZONING -
T0: Property owners within 350' ; FIL E N 0. 10379
Representatives of Planning District 9 .
PAGE
PURPOSE
To aQ^„neal a Planning Commission decision denying a Special
. Condition Use Permit to continue operating 3 community
residential facilities providing care for 23 mentally ill
persons.
LOCATION
386 Duke, 383 Colborne & 397 Coloborne
PETITIONER FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL
HEARING Tuesday, September 27, 1988 9:00 A.t�.
� Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall — Court House
Q U E S TIO N S zoning 298-4154 (Lisa Freese)
Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex,
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOP�: OP! FILE
Notice •ent 9/13/88
�� �� ��
ST. PAUL CITY COUNCI�
PU6l.IC HEARING NOTICE RECEIVED
ZONING SEP 191988 �
CITY CLERK
T0: Property owners within 350' ; FIL E N 0. 10379
Representatives of Planning District 9
PAGE
PURPOSE
To a�1 a Planning Commission decision denying a Special
Condition Use Permit to continue operating 3 community
residential facilities providing care for 23 mentally ill
persons.
LOCATION
386 Duke, 383 Colborne & 397 Coloborne
PETITIONER FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL
H E A R I N G Tuesday, September 27, 1988 9:00 A.��.
• Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House
Q U E S TIO N S Zoning 29s-4154 (�;Sa Freese)
Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, -,� --
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOP�: Cf; FILE
Notice sent 9/13/88
Writing about their model program �� ����
in Chicago, Witheridge and Dincin
' (1985) point out that a large number � /�'
of hospitalizations occur for '
nonpsychiatric reasons: "Problems of
this sort include having no income, ,
having no place to live, and having � .
no food on the table" (p. 72). "
' Pepper(1985), feels that the key , � � ,
� � issue to the problems and treatment
� of the CMI is the lack of appropriate ,
places for them to live: "To
paraphrase Susan Sheehan (1982�, 'Is
there no place on earth for them7' '
The hazards and stresses of ,
community tife place these vulnerable � ,
young persons seriously at risk, and
the cheerless room in a welfare
hotel . . . is hardly a solution" (p. 1).
He goes on to say: "By now a major
' lesson learned in that experiment i
' (deinstitutionalization and model .
, programs) is that the communiry has
not been able, by any of the means
tried so far, to offer an adequate ' � '
substitute for what might be called • ,
the homemaking function—the ,
kitchen, bedroom, and Iiaing room— ,
' of the institution" (p. 5, emphasis ,
� ' added). .
,
Pepper's suggestions for a tompre- �.
hensive continuum of housing(in ,
decreasing order of supervision) for '
the CMI are as follows: ; �
1. Gisis housing with total care
and support.
' 2. Supervised residences with ' `
around-the-clock staffing. This would
usually be temporary housing, lasting
anywhere from several weeks to 9
months. �
3. "DevelopmentaP' housing with �
actively supportive and rehabilitative
programning. This could last from ,
months to years, depending on �,
whether or not the person was able
to move on; it would include heavy
stafEing and structured use of time.
d c��.,�„r�,�P residences: oerma-
Writing about their model program
in Chicago, Witheridge and Dincin
(1985) point out that a large number •
of hospitalizations occur for : .'
nonpsychiatric reasons: "Problems of '
this sort include having no income, ,
`� having no place to live, and having • .
no food on the table" (p. 72)• �
' Pepper(1985), feels that the key � � , '
issue to the problems and treatment I
of the CMI is the lack of appropriate
places for them to live: "To
paraphrase Susan Sheehan[1982], 'Is
there no place on earth for them2' '
. The hazards and stresses of ,
communiry life place these vulnerable � .
• young persons seriously at risk, and
the cheerless room in a welfare
hotel . . . is hardly a solution" (p. 1).
He goes on to say: "By now a major ,
' lesson learned in that experiment i
, ' (deinstitutionalization and model �
•, programs) is that the community has
not been able, by any of the means
. tried so far, to offer an adequate � � '
substitute for what might be called • ,
the homemaking function—the ,
kitchen, bedroom, And living room— ,
' of the institution" (p. 5, emphasis ,
added). `
;
Pepper's suggestions for a compre- �
hensive continuum of housing(in � ,
decreasing order of supervision) for � ' '
' the CMI are as Eollows: . �
1. Crisis housing with total care
and support.
2. Supervised residences with � � ' '
around-the-clock staffing. This would
. usually be temporary housing, lasting
anywhere from several weeks to 9
months. •
3. "DevelopmentaC' housing with � ,,
actively supportive and rehabilitative
programning. This could last from _
months to years, depending on �.
whether or not the person was able
to move on; it would include heavy
staffing and structured use of time.
4_ Sunnortive residences: perma-
�-°�.. � �
�-� ,_��
� �: : ��. � �- /� ��
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMIIVT OF HUMAN SERVICES
���S•���nn8 Human Services Building
Commissioner 444 Lafayette Road
612/296-2701 St.Paul,Minnesota 551553815
September 23, 1988
James Janecek, M.D.
Familystyle Homes of St. Paul, Inc.
721 5th Avenue N.W.
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112
Dear Dr. Janecek:
I am pleased to write you this letter stating the '
Department's view on services provided by Familystyle
Homes of St. Paul, Inc.
The Department has been pleased with the type and quality
of services provided by Familystyle Homes. Under your
leadership, the residential services provided by the
facility have dramatically improved.
The recent development of your transitional living
services program has met the housing needs of persons
leaving residential facilities.
You have my continued support for providing residential
services in Ramsey County.
Sincerel ,
� SANDRA S. GARDEBR NG
Commissioner �
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
;:��<. `�" � ".��' / �:
,� . .
STATB OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Sandra S.Gardebrfng Human Services Building
Commissioner 444 Lafayette Road
612/296-2701 St.Paul,Minnesota 55155-3815
September 23, 1988
James Janecek, M.D.
Familystyle Homes of St. Paul, Inc.
721 5th Avenue N.W.
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112
Dear Dr. Janecek:
I am pleased to write you this letter stating the '
Department's view on services provided by Familystyle
Homes of St. Paul, Inc.
The Department has been pleased with the type and quality
of services provided by Familystyle Iiomes. Under your
leadership, the residential services provided by the
facility have dramatically improved.
The recent development of your transitional living .
services program has met the housing needs of persons
leaving residential facilities.
You have my continued support for providing residential
services in Ramsey County.
Sincerel ,
y� SANDRA S. GARDEBR NG
Commissioner
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
� � � �- /�� ti
JANECEK&WRIGHT
A7TORNEYS AT[AW RECEIVED
STONY IAI�OFFICE PARK 0 CT 0 3 1988
2451 FIFiEENTH STREETNORTHWEST
NEW BRIGHTON,MINNESOTA SSI I2 CITY CLE�K
TELEPHONE(6l2)611-1108
DIANNE WRIGH'T Parelegal
JEANETTE JANECEK ANNA COUNIHAN '
STEVEN ANDERSON OC tObez' 3� 19 8 8
AZembers, St. Paul City Council
c/o St. Paul City Clerk
386 City Hall
St. Paul, MN 55102
Re: Service of Sworn Statement
Dear City Clezk:
Enclosed please find and served upon you by personal
messenger the original and ten cop�es of the Sworn Statement of Dr.
James Janecek, President, Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc. Please
distribute the copies to all councilmeTnbers prior to the public hearing
scheduled for October 4, 1988. Thank you.
Sincerely,
JANECE & WRI T
SA/cf teven Anderson
Enclosures
cc: Familystyle
� (� n / /
, � (,%�.� ' d n � �C� ln �
�
------------------------------------------------------------------
SWORN STATEMENT OF: DR. JAMES JANECEK, PRESIDENT ���E1VED
FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL, INC. OCT 0 3198g
SUBMITTED TO: ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK
IN RE: THE APPEAL BY FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL, INC.
OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 88-64
DENYING FAMILYSTYLE'S APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL
CONDITION USE PERMITS WITH MODIFICATION TO
OPERATE COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES AT
386 DUKE, 383 COLBORNE, AND 397 COLBORNE
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. James Janecek, being first duly sworn upon oath,
deposes and states as follows:
1 . I am president of Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc . and
my business residence is 398 Duke Street, St. Paul , Minnesota,
55102 . I began testifying at the September 27 , 1988 public
hearing regarding the above-referenced matter. T was unable to
complete that testimony due to time restraints and I may not be
available to provide further testimony at the October 4, 1988
continuation of the public hearing. Consequently, I submit this
sworn statement in support of Familystyle's appeal .
2 . There are four areas I wish to address:
A. The Aqreement Reached In 1984. At the
September 27 , 1988 public hearing, Councilmember Wilson implied
that Familystyle somehow breached an earlier, informal agreement
reached prior to City Council Resolution 84-1121 to disperse the
three facilities at issue in the application before October 1 ,
1988. The record from the public hearings held in 1984, the
language of Resolution 84-1121 , written communications from that
time, and common sense indicate that no such agreement existed nor
, .
has any breach of any agreement occurred.
1 . The Actual Aareement. The items discussed
during the 1984 public hearings define the scope of the
"agreement. "
a. Size of the facilities. As paragraph 5 of
Resolution 84-1121 and paragraph 3 of the Agreement between
Familystyle and the West Seventh Federation dated February 27 ,
1984 demonstrates, Familystyle agreed to limit the number of beds
in the Duke and Colborne area to 175 . That agreement has always
been honored. _
b. Sunset Clause. I remember telling the City
Council that I could not predict the future needs of the mental
ill population or the future direction of the State and County
regarding Rule 36 facilities. This is clearly evidenced by the
Minutes of the public hearing before the City Council held on July
17 , 1984 that is in the current record as Appendix B of the
Memorandum in Lieu of Oral Testimony submitted by Familystyle at
the August 18, 1988 public hearing before the Zoning Committee.
c. Dispersal . The only reference I made to
dispersal at that point was simply indicating that I understood
Minnesota Statutes required the dispersal issues to be settled by
January 1 , 1990. (See Minutes of July 17 , 1984 public hearing
before the City Council ) . My thinking at that time, and I
thought the thinking of the Council , was to let the special
condition use permits on the three properties at issue terminate
on October 1 , 1988 and use that time to evaluate a variety of
2
possibilities including new site locations in light of possible
statutory or Code changes and the need for the beds involved. I ---
never intended to automatically disperse or terminate the three
facilities and would not have agreed to incorporating such a
condition into the Resolution had such language been included.
Rather, I simply understood that Familystyle would have the burden
of showing adequate grounds for modifying the distance requirement
if such a requirement still existed and the beds were still
needed.
I checked my records for past communications reflecting
this intent. I have attached two communications as Exhibits A and
B. Exhibit A is a letter to Lorene Magnuson of Ramsey County
Human Services. In that letter, I clearly state that I had no
intention of dispersing the three facilities at issue. Exhibit B
is a letter I sent to Councilmember Schiebel just days after
passage of Resolution 84-1121 . Although my intention is not as
clearly stated in this letter as it is in Exhibit A, the
highlighted portions of the letter deal with the sunset clause and
discuss other plans I was considering in the area in a manner
demonstrating that automatic dispersal was not in my thoughts even
immediately after the "agreement" occurred.
B. Familvstvle's Action Between 1984 And Present.
Since passage of Resolution 84-1121 , I have continued to operate
the three facilities. I have also attended numerous public
meetings and had several communications with County and State
officials regarding dispersal in general and dispersal of some
aspects of the facilities located in the Duke/Colborne area. I
3
, , � �' J�v ��
also took other action:
1 . Application to operate at Greenbriar location
In earlier 1985 , Familystyle applied for a special condition use
permit to operate a Rule 36 facility at 1060 Greenbriar. Had I
obtained that permit, I undoubtedly would not be before the City
Council requesting permits at the Duke/Colborne location.
Unfortunately, the Planning Commission denied that application
based on perceived difficulties with parking requirements. (See
Exhibit C attached) . I believe that the property is currently
being operated by another provider as a community residentzal
facility .
2. Arranqed for operation of larqe facilitv in
Goodhue Countv. In May 1985 , Familystyle arranged to purchase a
large facility outside of Cannon Falls in Goodhue County that
would have housed over 80 residents. A purchase agreement was
entered ( Exhibit D) and the Goodhue County Board granted
preliminary approval . Obviously, locating over 80 beds in the new
facility would have had a significant impact on the number of beds
operated in the Duke/Colborne area and the current appeal before
the City Council would not have occurred.
At that time, however, people opposing the facility
began to increase activity and sent letters to myself, the State,
and Goodhue County. I have attached two such letters as Exhibits
E and F. Not surprisingly, people in the rural areas surrounding
the proposed facility found reasons that a rural environment would
be dangerous for mentally ill individuals just as people in urban
4
areas have argued. The whole arrangement finally fe17 through
when the opposition filed a Petition for Environmental Assessment
Worksheet with the Environmental Quality Board. (Exhibit G) ,
Faced with a lengthy and costly administrative proceeding,
Familystyle elected to withdraw plans to locate in Goodhue.
3. Altered status of manv beds. As indicated in
Familystyle's original application , 386 Duke is currently being
operated as a Semi Independent Living Service (SILS) for four
individuals. At present, Familystyle currently operates 130 "Rule
36" beds and 45 SILS beds in the West/Seventh area. The 45 SILS
beds do not fall within the licensing structure of the Human
Services Licensing Act and, as such, do not appear to be included
in the current Code definition of community residential facility.
In effect, Familystyle's "Rule 36" facility is significantly
reduced.
C. Mv Position With Ramsev Countv. As Councilmember
Wilson noted at the outset of the September 27 , 1988 public
hearing, Ramsey County has always possessed the ability to alter
the size of the Duke and Colborne facility by simply reducing the
number of contracted beds. Familystyle would not to continue to
operate beds that are not occupied. Exhibit A, a letter to Ms.
Magnuson , is very typical of the approach I have taken with the
County since Resolution 84-1121 was passed. I let the County know
that I was not going to independently eliminate programs or
facilities. Rather, the County could decide which facilities they
felt be could eliminated and I would then notify the residents
effected. (See Exhibit A, Letter to Lorene Magnuson: " . . . I must
5
advise you that we have no plans to disperse our
residents. . . Please advise me if you plan to disperse these
residents so that I may review the matter with our Board and the
residents involved. " ) . The fact is, the County continued to use,
and I assume need, all the beds they contracted for.
D. Constitutional And Human Riqhts Act Issues. At the
September 27 , 1988 public hearing, I began to address objections I
have concerning St. Paul Code Sections 60.413 and 60.423. As
Councilmember Wilson noted, I have consistently argued that the
distance requirement contained in the Code and the statutor-y
over-concentration provisions referenced in Planning Commission
Resolution 84-1121 are in violation of the 14th Amendment of the
U . S. Constitution , Article 1 , Section 2 of the Minnesota
Constitution, and Section 363.04 of the Minnesota Human Rights
Act. Although the Council did not allow me to discuss this
objection at the September 27 , 1988 hearing, I want it on the
record that the special condition use permits for 386 Duke, 383
Colborne and 397 Colborne should be granted for this reason alone.
3 . Finally, I want to point out to the Council that this
public hearing regards an appeal of the Planning Commission's
decision to deny Familystyle's application for special condition
use permits with modification of the distance requirement. As
such, Familystyle submitted evidence pertaining to Code Section
64. 300(4) and grounds for modification. Familystyle offered
statistical data showing Familystyle's impact in the neighborhood,
including the impact of the three facilities at issue in this
6
appeal . That data shows an overall positive effect.
At the September 27 , 1988 public hearing, the City
Council was determined to discuss the "agreement" reached in 1984.
If the Council decides to continue trying to determine what role
any such agreement plays in the present matter despite the clear
language of Resolution 84-1121 and the new application presently
before the Council , then I urge all members of the Council to
review the record carefully and establish exactly what was agreed
upon by all parties and what actions all sides have taken since
that time in response to that agreement.
Further your affiant say h ot.
. r Jam Janecek
Subscribed and Sw rn to before me
this day �October, 1988.
otary Pu lic
STEV£N ANDERSOW
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNE�pY',�
ItAMfEY COUNTY
Mr eoMMianoN�x��Kes AUCi.i, tYl1
7
' �
±` � FA M I LYSTYLE H O M ES ��Family Liviny is Mealthy Uvinfl��
9
0 24 RESIDENCES&BILLING OFFICES
398 OUKE STREET
� � �, ST.PAUL,MN 55102
��(� 1-612-222-6600
• ' a
Feq�E wp��
MEMORANDUM
ES JANECEK.M.D.
'EnscuW�OK�csr/ �; I,orene Magnuson, �
"m°"°"°' Planning Specialist I
ANNA CONROY Racnsey County Htmian Services
":""°` Suite 890 ,
1UEUNE MINES 16� Fi. Kellogg Blvd.
�svaea St. PdL11, NN 55101
:Y MAIT$ON,q.N.
Proyram Oirector BO}� S[�E�.t.Z
�P MELLA.B.A. rrG11C�e Ac�hninistrator
Pr�r���� Ramsey County Htunan Services
7 VACHA,C.C.U.P. Pl1L'ClictSE �l .�rVl�$� 5 �
Vrogram pirsctOr 16� �''. Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, NN 55101 -
Don Henry
Ramsey County H�m�an Services
Purchase of Services Division
160 E. Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, NN 55101
FRQM: James Janecek,M.D.
Chief �cecutive Officer
L�►TE: Sept�nber 13, 1985
RDGARDING: DISPFRSAL LAW AND Tf� PROPFRTIFS
TEIAT YOU LIST AS 383 COLBORNE, 397 COLBORNE
AND 368 DUKE
was surprised 'ay your phone call. I haven't reoeived your letter but I presume that you
re goirx� to send me a copy. In the meantime, I must advise you that we have no plans to
isperse our residents.
he three properties in question were given a special use oermit until 1 October 1988. It
� unfortunate that someone has interpreted this as an intent on our part to disperse.
sch is not the case.
lease advise me in writing as to whether you intend to disperse these residents so that I
ay review this matter with our Board and the residents involved.
ost sin e y yours,
ames J ,M.D.
J:prm
A DIVISION OF FAMILYSTY�E OF ST.PAUL,INC.
CORPORATE ADDRESS:740 OOCTORS PROfESSIONAL BUILDING,ST.PAUL,MN 55102
1-612-227-1917
PRESIOENT,JAMES JANECEK,M.D.
�
- �� °'�y MENTAL HEALTH CLINICS
F _.. .
��• • • of Minnesota, P.A.
CORPORATE OFFICES
740 Doctors Professional Building
280 North Smith Avenue
St. Paul,Minnesota 55102
1 -612-227-2144(24 Hour Call Number)
1 -612-227-4555(24 Hr. Pt.Helpline)
M fi M O R A N D U M
James Janecek,M.D. TO:
Medicat Director Councilman James Schiebel
Office of the City Council
7th Floor, City Hall
oycene Walstrom,C.C.D.P. St. Paul, MN 55102
���.o�n��or,o�seNtces FROM:
James Janecek, M.D.
DATE:
iard J.Venjohn,Ph.D.,�.C.P. 27 August 1984
>ir.of Family Therapy Services REGARDING:
POTENTIAL CHANGS IN SPBCIAL USB PERMIT
FOR HOMBS OF FAMILYSTYLB HO1�ES
larne Rogosheske,M.S.W.
Dir.ot Sxial Services INTRODUCTION:
I am in the process of purchasing all real estate from Mr. Hillman.
At this point in time, there is a possibility for an agreement which �
would solve everyone's problems for the foreseeable� and indefinite.
future. That solution being the West 7th Street Federation seems to have been
very upset about the homes being spread out across Jefferson.
PROPOSAL:
In recognition of this concern� I am prepared. if we can come to a quick agree-
ment, to arrive at the following determination:
(1) I will either sell off� or have Mr. Hillman sell off, 339 Duke and
339-1/2 Duke as well as 333 Oneida. This would remove all of the
homes outside of Jefferson except 354 Jefferson, which is across
the street on Jefferson and is a home in which we have placed alot
of money. If we did this, we would then agree never to cross
Jefferson under any circumstances except for the 354 house.
(2) With the above consideration in rrmnd to the West 7th Street Feder-
ation, our consideration would be as follows: (a) We would re-
ceive a special-use permit for 412 Duke (which we own) and two, or
perhaps three, homes, depending on their size, to replace the
three we have dispensed. (b) At the same time, the special-use
permits would be changed for the homes we have previously sunset-
ted:� (c) All of this would have to be done within a period of two
to three weeks at the very most since I would have to get a spe-
cial-use permit from the City of St. Paul, make the arrangements
for Mr. Hillman. arrange all of the appropriate financing� and ,
most importantly, install the hardwired fire alarm and the Centrax
phone system that we are in the process of doing.
� �c?.,,.,..�,:��Q S � ti-���
�AUL MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC NEW BRIGHTON MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC STILIWATER MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC
)odo�s Professional Building 721 Fitth Avenue NoAhwest New 8righfon.Minnesota 55t 12 921 So.Greeley St.
Jorth Smith Avenue Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 Telephones:(612)636-9177 (612)227-2144(24 Hour Call Number) Stillwaler,Minnesola 55082
,hone:(612)227-2144(24 Hour Call Number) Telephones:(612)439-5660
(612)227•2144(24 Hour Call Numbcr)
., , �� ��v (v�
' Councilman James Schiebel
St. Paul City Council
Page 2
AFTERTHOUGHT:
I recognize this is a tremendous request to make of you and if it is impossible,
please let me know. What I don't want to do is to have a bunch of ineetings with
the West 7th Street Federation. I tentatively set up one with Betty Moran. A1-
most within a day of setting up the meeting, I heard from two of the West 7th
S treet Federation board members that her position was that if we were going to
meet, she was godng to get us down to 21 homes and soforth. What I want to do is
to avoid all of that friction and if you think this can't be done and you can't
act as our intermediary� then I think we should probably fozget it. I think it
is a good opportunity for everyone to be satisfied� but. then again, I don't want
to run up another SB.00U worth of legal bills in order to get something done that
I really don't need but would strictly be, from your viewpoint. of great consid-
eration for the neighborhood.
In the meantime. all of the neighbors we have talked to are happy with us and,
indeed, several members of the West 7th Street Federation have approached us and
told us so and one of them has even offered to sell his home to us since- he is
choosing to leave the area. .
I recognize this is a complex and difficult problem and surely if you can't do
anything for us. well� then that is fine. I am not unhappy about that and we
will just move ahead. I do have a board meeting coming up this Thursday so if it �
is possible for you consider this and give me a call by then. I would surely
appreciate it.
Thanks to you and Ma�e for your help in getting us through the difficult times. I
am sure it wasn't any easier for you than it was for us.
�
James Janecek, .D.
JJ:cs
P.S.: For yo r perusal, I am enclosing a copy of the campus map. I have out-
lined in green the homes we will keep and have put in yellow highlight the three
homes I think may be sufficient for our use if we were going to get them special-
use permitted. I have then cir�cled in red the three homes that we would dispense
with that we currently have.
� 'v�
� � � � '�,1�
. �
I'�.
, .._� ---- -..�� / �.'
. - , - -- ,
, , :
_ . --- —.----. -----��__ ...._ .---.. , ,. _ ;
---- __ :;� _.1_�_.-:.
---. 3� . s` .
_ .__._ C� _. % _1`�-- _ 3''�� 3� i�
_ + _ _ Q .. �: ��a�'
� �( '^f + ,� • �. �c1�-�— `—---
� � i � . � � � . - �CJ
__._ ' I b �� __ 3 S`1 _ 2
�\
�
� ��l'f�.�'�'.. �o r.a A V -�:.,.<
_._ .� I_;. � � � 0�,.
� ' --- ' � � 1Y�� .._ _ � � �
� ' -- �-__�_...;.._. .�
I P � -36� � —. � :�. :�:;�
; p .__ ; 367 ��:� i U ���
(�- . 3,0 ..--.
,� -�--
- � . . i �7�r -
• � '� { .._..._ 37 �.. � ��� .1R�.._ ._.
�� /� � ...._..�.., . -/ `r��v ••'J V3 /
, , � Uj •� 3 'c - •-- .
� ; � �..... .��t43r�� �'� •�ou 3 8�_.
; i � 3�5 � "'`t! i
' j � " � ,j�:j��^ � 3 yg I---- -
1 � � .___ `�°�^ � . _-.J
' � . ..._ .�: � �f
� � .. � ._. `�
s 1 � y ^ "C1�� 4—
---- -- � ��- �C�- S 7; � � -�-`�
j �,� ���.r,
�v� —
�
���`'T' °';, CITY OF SAINT PAUL
o - ' ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
� uii�t t�i �
,►� „a DIVISION OF PLANNING
,��. 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesoa,55102
612-292-1577
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
February 26, 1985
James Janecek, M.D.
Family Style of St. Paul , Inc.
740 Doctors' Professional Building
Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102
Dear Dr. Janecek:
On February 21, 1985, the Zoning Committee denied your application for a �
Special Condition Use permit to operate a community residential care facility
at 1060 Greenbrier.
On February 22, 1985, the Planning Commission sustained the Zoning Committee's
decision on a 11 to 7 vote. The reasons for denying your application are cited
in the attached resolution.
You may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council by
filing a� application for appeal (enclosed) with an $180.00 fee by March 12,
1985.
Feel free to contact me at 292-1577 , extension 295, if I can be of further
assistance.
Sincerel , �
. �
� � ,
_ � � ,
Fred S. Haider
Zoni ng
FSH:pmk
enclosure
.....�` .
c�ty of saint� pau! � .
plannmg ca�nmission r�soh.,tio� . _ � - -
fiie number . � : . __
date . - � � .- � . . -
_ . �:��
� �' ' ' . . ' . .. .. , ... . . • ' . . � . . . - � ' . _ . . ,Y
WHEREAS, Family Style� of St.� Pau1 , Inc. (�9706) applied for a Special Condition �
. . Use permit under the provision of Section 60.423(3) of the Saint Paul �
Legislative Code to operation a community residential facility at 1060 -
� Greenbrier; and :>: .. -
, . - . - � . � - . .
WHEREAS, the Zoning.Committee of� the Planning Canmission�on February 2I, 198�, �
. �__ held a public hearing at which all persons present were given an opportunity to
� be heard pursuant to satd application in accordance with the requirements of =�-_��=_���
� 64.300 of the Saiat Paul Legislative Code;- aAd � � � .
. . ;a
. . , . � .. . . r _ � .. � . � , . i'� . ,
... '= �. .��,,:,� -;. . . - . . . . �. . . � ..'. . '.:. ,.t} __ ' .. .
� '�- NHEREAS, the Safnt�Pau1 Planning Comnission, based on evidence presented to its .
_ °' �Zoning Comnittee at the public. hearing as substantially reflected in the �
; �� minutes, made the following finding of fact: . - _ � :
- 1.. Based on testimony presented at the public hearing the Zoning Co�aittee -• �
.. determined that adequate off-street parking is not available for the
- proposed use at the subject site. .. - . �
N041, THEREFORE,' BE IT RESOLYED, by the�Saint Paul Planning Comnission that. the
. .
_ :�,.. request.for �Special Condi ti on Use permi t be deni ed. : -:.. �--- _...�. � .- � � - -
� _ �: -. . .. - . . . _ -
�� � � : . - �.� • . . �
.. . . .
,
_ r - . : . . . -
�;
moved by -
5e�c�cied by �
in favor � � �
against_____ �
� ..J��..�. � '� . 1 WlllTf-OIiI�rC
' , ',�1 - •�t�� I/
' C���N�lrnr�4 G�� >>>
, lINK�b�aYladM � > { /��
� � /� (l�
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
R EALTOIF� �011M A►IIIOVtO�Y MINM�fOTA Af�OC1ATIOH 0►11[ALT011/�
uivu�e�v�r.�.r��
lced Wing ,Mlnn.,._...�,lk��.�_�........�.....,..,.1984
RECEIVED OF.........,Isi0.�a...TdA,�S,�$. Z4.Q..P.RS..4.4F.��..k'F.R�es,y,ipnal„Building.�..St. PaulA.MN 55102
�he iva�ol..,Five.Hundred and no/100 dollars ' �'" ' " '
...... ................ .........................................................................(i...SOD»mQ........) DOI.U1eS
..........�:h�sk...................................... .............,� earnesc money and In part p�rmenc fot the purelws ot pcopert�at
(Cl«Y.Cr►.b M���tM vN�Nu�t����.�r N�t���1VU W AIJ)
approx. 5 miles NE of Cannon Falls, MN and known as MINERAL SPRINGS ����� ��
Couery ot.....Gpodhue.......................................................Scare of Minn.............i�{�........................
••, eson,and desalbed�s foUo�i,to-wrli:
Tax Parcels $28-9600; 28-9601; 28-9500; 28-9300 (Legal to govern)� conaiating of
38.91 acrea moie or lesa.
Including all built-in equipment and all peraonal property formerly used for the
operation and maintenance of this facility; and further including those house furniahings
and appliances which are the property of the seller. An 8 page list of items has been
provided the buyer as a general repreae�tation of the pereonal property (attached);
hovever, it ia understood by both buyer and aeller that this liat is not all inclueive.
all oE w�hie6 properry tbe undetsigned hu thb day wi co ehe buya(oc che�uen oE:
�hxs�..J�undz,ed...��eb.c�:..�i�re,.�hauaa�d..and.. a/.kQ4..�.v#��,�;�...-------:..cs3as,,000;oo..� noi.t�xs,
w�bkh ths bu�er�;rees to pa�fn�he Iollo�vlo;manner:
Pama�maoer hereta paid Z�.O.O�.QQ...........and 5..9.�Q4f�.... ash,on October..16.�..1984........;�e dace at clainy
The balance of $375,000.00 is to be paid by.a Contract For Deed at an interest rate of
9X, with monthly payments determined by amortizing the balance over 15 yeaza, and aith
a balloon balance at the end of 5 years. ,
Purchase is,contingent 'upon the buyer obtaining all necessary permits, certificationa
and licenaea from varloua govern►oent agencies to enable'the buyer co operate the facility
in accordance with hia planned uee.
Purchase ia contingent upon the buyer obtaining Purchase Of Service Contract with
the hoat county, which is Goodhue County.
Suljut te perfene�na by ehs butsr�he ultet��ner to e�ccuu�nd deliver a..........GAO.KXdC.�...�4C..................................n0'�rnnry Deed .
(w be�oinsd In bp�poux,it�nr) eonverin�m�rksnble eide ro��id premiw�subjce�only�o�Ae►oltow�ins eenp�ani:
��� HYIIAIA4�IIC t011I�1�IfW7�ordi�antet.Stue�nd�eder�l rc�ul��iom.
(b) Antriaron�eeluins�o ux o�impro�emen�of premi�a w�iihou��Reaive(orfsieuro Dro.i�ion.
(e) Aetenaien of�a�miner.b u�m�evd risAn to�he Snu e(Minnaa�.
(d) Veiiiry snd�nin�se e�umene�oAitA de na imer(ere vi�A praene improvemee��.
(e) A hn o(temeu u lolbw�r. (unla��peci6ed,na wbKa ro un.�cief)
b�rcr�ti.0 wr�ne ral a�.m n:a due tn�ne re,�l9 85....,and�ny unpdd imullmenn of ipecid�untmenq Wrable�hert�rhl�
�nd thetedaa&Iltr v�mnn�h�e n�l ea�ee tuet due in�he yeu �9 g5....��u be... on-}�mesta d.............1+eme�iaJ clwiRn�bn '
(full,p�ni��or non•Feme�u���nu ahich)
Ndeher�Ae�cUer nor�he u�kr..�ene n�.k..nr reprnenuiion or v�rnnry vhawever ceMerninR the�mouet•of r�d e�t�a us��
vA(ch�hdl bt�ue�ysie�t tAe propeny wb�pusnt to tAe d�u of pu�dau.
&Iler ernmnn�hu buildin{�.if�ny,ue tndrsly vi�Ain ihe bounduy line�ot ehe rooeery�nd� rer��e n,nove+ii perwnJ roye
nea tneluded henln�nd dl debri�(rom�Ae ptsmBe�prior�o{+auman due.
TED_.ODa.in�u.rxe�.Sii-�R�.ki..y
2T�e aller IrnUer,��rea�o deliver pouailo�na I��er�h�n a8�ee..p�...�igB�t1B..................provWed tAat dl eendi�iem e(�AI�
��resment h�oe bete temy itd ri�b.Unleu aher.riu�peciReJ�hi�yalc�hall be ciofe on e7before GO d�yi(rom�he daee Aercof.
1n ehs went thi�Oreperry i�dei�royed u�ubu�nei�lly d�m�s�d br Rre or�ny oiher auu before.�h�clain�da�e.�hi�yrnmee��h�il
betant null�nd�eid.u the purthuet t option,�nd�II monies p�id hereundcr ihall pa relunded�o him.
Tbe burtr and �dler dw mutuall��stte�h�t pro nu adjus�mems ot rrnu.in�ere��,inwnnte�nJ ciey w�er.�nd.in the np e(
income Cropsrq'�cv�rent open�in�espenui.�MII be made��ol.date..op...e}oe�tng.................................................................................
The ulkr sAd�,viiAin�rcuonibk�im4�her�ppror�l of�Ai� �greement. (urmsA �n �buna of tide. ot � EeRiteereJ troperry
Abtma artified�o d���ro includt proper u�rc6e�eovetin��t b�nkrup�oics,�od Surc and �edent jud�menu�od liem.TAe buTer�A�11 be
�Ilered !0 d�n�het«ceip�eharco((or ernninuion o(s+id�i�le�nd�he makina of snr el�eaion��here�o,uiJ ob�aniem m be nuJ�in
vthin�or deemed�o be r�ived.I!�n�objeeion��rc�o m�de�Ae�eller�hdl be•Ilo..ed 1t0 d.y�w m.k�woh�Id�muksnble.PenJ(n�
cotreteien o(tide tM p�rmtnn Aercundet rpuieed tAdl be pouponed.bw vpon cernaion ol rlde�nJ�I�Ain 10 d�y�d�er vrrituw nak�
m dK burer.�Ae p�niu�hdl oer(orm�his�sreement atording w Ia urm�.
I!�aid�ide b na mukenbk�nd'u na m�d�w vi�Ain 120 d�y�from�hs due ot wriaen oAjeaiom�ben�u u�brwe proriJeJ,�Ah
��nement�hall be nult�nd void,�t opion o!the buyer,�nd neither printip�l�1��11 bt liable(o�d�m��si bereumlcr�e tAe ahir p�i�ciql.
All m �hernolere pid by�ne bu�er�h�ll De rclunded.I(ehe ti�te�o uid propenr ba found m�rkenble or be w made�ri�hin aid time,
.�d,.i'd�uysr rMll dtlault in�nr ol tht�gttemenq�nd continue in Jet�ul�!or�period ot I O d�yi.�hen�ed in iMt tw�he ullar m�y
urmin�u tAi�eentnee�ed on wch termie�tion dl�he pqmeen m�de upon thii tonrc�ct ihdl bs ronined br utd Nlkr�nd uld y¢ent,,u
�heir mpeaiv�ineerc,u�n.y.p�e�t.n Ipuid�ted dumse�.time beioR of ehe euente hareoL 7hi�provi�ien i6d1 na deyrive ei�her prry o(
�h��i M el enforoint ihe�pea c perfermmcs ot ihii rnn�nct provided iuch con�na i��ll not be�ennin�teJ�s dotp�k,�nd provided�abn
�o enforce�uch ipeciRt perle�m�nce�A�tl be commenad.viihin�ie mon�h��far��ch ritht o!�nio�tA�ll�ri�e.
le b un�entaod�ed��reed th�t tAis uk b m�de rvlject�o el�e�pprov�l by the ewner o(uid Premiin in vridnR��th�t tAt ueder.
d4n�d�pn�b in ne m�nnet liabl�ar n�pomiblt on�aount ol�hii�areemsnt,esapt to rervrn or�nouet fot tht e�tena money p�id und�t
iAw eonu�a.
TAe ddi�ery o(dl p�pen and monki�hdl be made re�he o1Kce ef: In/Comm RE<y
2000 Old Main, Suite 310
ed Wi �,�,� 06 ,,!-
M voro.e H� ./.�CfS�k'.rc.�....�(j.r...............................................Ate�
1 rAe uedenlsned.o«ner ol�he abo.e land.do herc � ���}�A rd {t t 1 p�
[be�bove��rcemea�■ad Ju wle�hereb�m�de. e tby�� o(nn ue�he aW oroperry for�Ae�tke ted
NINERAL SPRINGS COMMISSION on behalf of �voe �he �erm� abm meu�ioned, �nd iub'ject to ��� eoedit(om
hereia expreued.
Goodhue, Rice, Mawer 6 Steele Counties ,—�
............................................ ..........................................(SFi11.) ! '
Selle� ......... .....4 ...... . ....(SY111.I
By. . .e��.. ...
..............................................................................................(SELL) ...... ...... .......... . ....C.��.�FAL)
Seller Burer
�tNt•�t6
THIS IS A LEGALLX IIINDING CONTRACT. IF N T)ND STAOD.SL•FK COMPETENT ADVJCE.
. 1
� � � � ,
� �
o ,
� � :
I y i
� I'
�� `�
�� N
� ';
� � •
� �.a' :;�
_ �
a .
L - l
� i X if�'r-at• '� �
Ws'� .���� '_- c' i
� _�.o.
Wy� _�..�� .a
Z=� '�02 =
yQ n - .:r���:. �. L�
i�5 OW q -.:.. , �.n
'� :�, .:: .a
' �- `� M1`- :.�:. O
0
'� � I��:�' cD
� s� '��:��_ � ,
� �"� � �
� , � �- �'���
February 4, 1985
Dr. James Janecek
740 Doctors Professiona.l Building
280 North Smith
St. Paul. ru� 551oz
Dear Dr. Janeceki
As concerned area neighbors of the Old Ca.nnon Valley Center in
Goodhue County, Minnesota� we consider the proposal of Family Style of
St. Paul, Inc. unxise. We feel it xould not be beneficial for the .
xelfare of the chronically mentally ill patients.
In our opinion� it xould be inappropriate to b�ing the poor� home-
less city people of our society to a rural community. The location.
directly along the Cannon River� along xith the wooded area can ca.use
harm to someone unfamiliar xith the area.
The state of repairing the facility is a factor also to be considered.
The facility is in much need of updating to �et the safety features of
government standards that are required for the well being of these people.
The adost disturbing aspect of Family Styles location is the avail-
ability of inedical facilities. Can this small community handle these
situations such as fire, emergency health care� someone lost or any one
of the numerous misha.ps that can occur? There are liaited support systems
such as fire, police. social service or medical for these residents in
this rural axea.
In our opinion, xe recommend Family Styles, Inc. to find a location
xhich xill better fulfil the needs of your patients.
Very truly yours�
0
� ���
� i �
�
MANUFACTURERS OF AIRLINE GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
�.`:a��> :`."�'� CORPORATION
3255 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55121
PHOrie 612/454-5112
Febz•>>ary 7, 1985
Dr. James Janecek
ramily Style of St. Paul, Inc.
71�,� Doctors' Professional Building
2g� rJo. Smi th Av.
St. Pavl, r,N 551r2
�ear ilr. Janecek,
`uJe are concerned residents living next to The �annon Val�oy �en�er which yov are
in tr�e process of pt�rchasing to operate as a residence ior chro.iically mentally ill.
iJe wer¢ in attendence at the meeting in December where you stated yov would be
contacting each of us individt�aliy to get ovr opinion on the center being vsed for
ch:onically mentally ill. Since we have not heard from yot�, we decided to�put
oUr opinion in writing.
We definitely feel this facility would not be aNpropriate for several reasons.
It take� between !�5 minutes to an hoi;: for the sheriff to get ot�t here. We had
an "escapee" from Detox. at ovr door one night in below zero weather in pajan�as
and barefoot with a bleeding wrist. 1�5 minutes can be a long time. l�Je've had
peo�ie watching vs at night from ot�tside ot�r windows. '�Je've had things stolen
and later fovnd to have been taken by residents from the center. There simply is
not good police protection in this area.
The terrain is such that a person can either get lost or badly huri wandering
around. There was a woman in treatment who fell down an embankment and had to be
hauled out on a stretcher. Also, th2 Cannon River being so close is a hazard. �Je
vnderstana yov have no intention of installing a fence around the area for protection.
Jur fire department is volunteer and they do a good job. }iowevei•, they are over
7 miles away and that many people in that size strt�cture and being that old, could
be a r�al problem.
?�e personally feel having between 85 to 100 chronically mentally ill peop2e in one
facility is too many. Smaller groups in group homes wot�id be more appropriate for
better care and su�ervision. This seems to be the Lrend and :re feel a good one.
'�(e feel the building itself not adeqvate for that many people. The sewage trrcatment
Ylant coulci not handle that.
:ve were very p-eased to hear yov state at the meeting that you will not g� ahead
�ith your plans if there is opposition iro m the community. If you have done any
research at all I am sure •. yot� fouc�d there is much opposition to your plan.
Sincerely,
�� • � .-- _ .
�_:i' `�i�2,� � ' " �c.� ,��2L`��v
�='„
Gene\'8 B:llie Stinar
Rt. J#3, Box 305
Cannon rails, MN 55�09
�
��oA�� o ...�. o , _o...s � .,�4
F A E G R E 8� B E N S O N
POO4Cw r�OwOBrCC �OSCOw r CE CL�2n0CTw�t ♦rtOP vG�• YES�i[RwAN
4[OwGC [.��qOi�+O w.Sw��N Sr��n[`C.�w oN♦ MO 5
'0���«�"O1�Ci i1iP a°'OQ"' 2300 MUITIFOODS TOWER �.��:' • Ncso.. �ec..... .. +z��+ocw
q. Cvtiv�wGw��+ �OMr+ s Gy.`M� Cw r� pOC+CVS�[�n Q [�+��i�CR,wN„Cw�LDi
Os[w♦ w OC��C �i�CwSJ. ��f ..�R. 40B[wi l.Clf���N3 O�v�D•
�CS • �t5 ��+CS o.S�CC+E�a50n BR�CE �.CwG�Cn On� u4Cr�NCTit[A
SvS��+ • ♦COBSON A• w ASiNO
ccn.�o :io� wc�o c.wwo.+ 33 SOUTM SIXTH STREET ww�.cA : nc...wo� :�c Ms
Cti�M�[S'l �0�1r� .Dnv�O w[��� �
•�Cw O�G�GC JOwti w.SfC��CN DO�+�ID CJS�[P�MO •NpES130M
•wry�w w •«so« �o�.. e.wonoo� wcNO• � w�iou.+c p: •�w�c...+.w
s�o.* w ,o»..son n o. o�eo
cs .��z...vw�cc o».s . .c MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-3694 �cs o o'c q..ryow .`.;�rss. w �c...w.w
GORDOti`q B�lD�C+Ea ��0�+�5 G.�+OwG�N w�p q e � �
JOhti O. tiCn CDw�wO G.+C•p nr� iCwrC. NG
•O»�LD e r�Cn5��0 �ONr� w. ,aO[ w+Ew M� r�CO �y00qwu�n eRMES .
MOwr�u w.C�wn[�+rCw wO6CNn� ♦.SC�uC�i.�P. rwOSw[llvwwG UCL B�.�TTCPSON
�+E�+C[ C.e r+ O �. son 612/3l1-5300
�w �q�pw C•N 0.O'�+C��q pwC���wD w�e��t�w` CnwOlp� �E RNCw
�orp.w�� r.o�+�s � C• TELEX n25�31 NoM�s .� w�r� �oc/«cw
o .`+�C�.c� t.�+ r�t��cr • �rZ��w�w�Cc
���oT.. ./o...� o.S..irEwn•• JArnCG rn
D�viO n o�w`N�ra .O�SC�+.� � g S�H • �+� '}�v�ra �v�e50N
wD C.SC��+O�[• •Oww�C � tiGp CCR�nD �+ NOlT�tiO ERC.�.� J E i G
M�Cw�CI p.SiCw�NT CwlviN L ^�SE•
wM0r�5 �+.CnOSB�,� �[Mw� ♦ �SCw O�v�O � NO[P M D�viD M MpaCMOUS[
�Ow�G B.G�AinEN.�M w0• H �CB[00«
�CS B.•OnCr� wOP• wCll n[iEM�� wr�O�s�s• C�M H w�UMCN
�Rir.un i DO�[w W�Gn�r PpCr� w cN T �h
OY�NC w 40w„1[ �Or�r, E G�[�• SICVCM�w ' OwCw305 i[nC�eG.[t2w�C'R��
GCOAGC w S�CV[M C•SC�AO[A
w(S •.DV[w0�� �O�w P OHGEU Ni51�u � 5~CG[SwynO ww1Ew GwAVCS
U![w♦ v rOaC�[w �[�D� �+ �O�wO MOw�wD J lVwGr+�N M�w� A
�[5 �+.S��a�CS A�C��wD � �(�OC AOS[n♦ w / TON C��C�~C�R�vOUK./�AN
O��C C.BCi+O«Cw S�CV[ w.G�Sn�r�S SUSwe� GOOON��UNC DOUG�/�5 ONG�
G�IC a [l� rw AO�[o�Cn.n[w�G[S TCwOi�r P SCwuPn C�A�S+�NE O.nc a�w�H
�c4w• w~sw�oCn SrCV[e� �+OCASOw J3B0 AEPUBIIC PLA2A �www�[3 C.0 o[wsw�h+ D��i+� o�wc rwonw�s5c•
r�CUOwiw�i �ONG ��� O.Cww�'ii�wCCr.� O�ti�[l Op w�lCi[w VAl[N�E w�.WEICh
src•.c.. oswo.. c�•w�cs s. •. J70 SEVENTEENTM STqEET v e.• or+acwo
. s.• ricw o•��o •. c«.aics • wa.�w.
�o oow e cO�...,�n. •�+CS [.�+ ps0�+ DENVER, COIORAOO 60202-�004 D^H�[� � ncH
•Cn[nu�r� wC�CCC� L •A� l DCn40N
.,�c.::c:«....AP� ..a. .,..,, ..c«cie��,so.. JOO/392-9�90 .,..•.ow."......�cs
-acs�oc.., �. oc..vcw
February 7, 1985
Hon. Michael Sullivan
Executive Director
Environmental Quality Board
Capitol Square Building -
Room 100
550 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
RE: Petition for Environment Assessment Worksheet
Dear Mr. Sullivan:
I enclose a Petition for Environment Assessment Work-
sheet regarding a proposal by Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc.
("Familystyle") to establish a care facility in Goodhue County,
Minnesota, for more than 85 urban chronically mentally ill at an
abandoned facility identified during its years of operation
as the Mineral Springs Sanitarium.
The Mineral Springs Sanitarium property is currently zoned
"agricultural" with any previous variances or conditional uses
permitted on the property having been extinguished by abandonment of
such variance or conditional use for over two years. While it seems
doubtful at best that the Goodhue County zoning authority would ever
grant a zoning variance for the operation of such a facility due to
its adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the
community, the significant environmental concerns expressed in the
enclosed Petition should be addressed.
While I believe the Petition is clear, if you have any
questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Very truly yours,
w �, .
erry . Snider
Jws/jhh
Enclosure
CC: Dr. James Janecek
Mr. Roger G. Anderson
Citizens Committee
PETITION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
A. Description of Proposed Pro 'ect
Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc. ("Familystyle") , a for
profit Minnesota corporation, proposes to purchase the former
Mineral Springs Sanitarium facility located in Goodhue County,
Cannon Falls, Minnesota (and described more particularly in
Exhibit A attached hereto) . Familystyle plans to use the facility
for boarding more than 85 chronically mentally ill clientele
primarily from the metropolitan area. According to Familystyle,
the targeted characteristic of the facility population will include
individuals with problems such as psychotic episodes, depression,
physical abuse victims, and perpetrators, suicidal episodes,
individuals with assaultive behavior characteristics, and other
behavioral disorders.
B. Proposer of the Project
Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc.
c/o Dr. James Janecek
740 Doctors Professional Building
280 North Smith
St. Paul , Minnesota 55102
C. Name, Address, and Telephone Number of the Re resentative
of the Petition
Roger G. Anderson
Route 3, Box 296
Cannon Falls, Minnesota 55009
(507) 265-4143
D. Description of Potential Environmental Effects Which May
Result From the Project
The signatories on this Petition believe the above-
described use will have an adverse effect on the environment
in the following respects:
First, the property lies on the Cannon River
which has been designated a scenic and recreation
river by the Department of Natural Resources . The
antiquated t.rickle sewer system, used by the
property, appears to be in disrepair and lies in a
flood plain area of the river which would be subject
to flooding during times of high water. The
potential for harm to the environment in
congregating so many people close to the river
is a prescription for environmental disaster.
Second, the buildings comprising this long
abandoned facility contain an undetermined
amount of asbestos insulation. In fact, boxes of
asbestos are stored on the facility premises and
is itself a health hazard.
Third, the facility is heated by a coal boiler
which emits unfiltered air pollutants. There
, is no visible evidence that scrubbers have been
installed at the heating plant to reduce this potentially
serious threat to the air quality in this rural
environment.
E. Material Evidence Indicating Potential for Significant
Environmental Effects
All of the items described in paragraph D, above, have
been observed by many of the petitioners. Use of the facility
-2-
CJ �! �� ��
�/• `_
for the projected contemplated use has the potential for a significant
impact on the environment, including the quality of the air and
water in this region.
-3-
�;� � S;;a � y�"`,c a-",� ..'�`' %���r,r""t.,,�"9���,r�,�v°� � j c.� £ , .,.�,..yy�c+3� 5:�+" y,`�$,".y.�iR" x°+x r?�r�f'���y�,'rSx� °Ef�!' .q'-,�� '�^.;:w ,.�# ,�' '�
f i t� r �� I � '�%�. : ���:, d� "'�y�a.#t � ,1 �... �/`A'� � !".�.� I��a ��,�
� _ ^" x "N � � 5�n. "a �3r s � ` r F� F '`x' 'fir�s�n'i '� �',��' � b�t °'d
t m ' f 4
r � � .h$' - ��tk'�� k,_ { �.�,.? '����`� �" ��.h �, 4 + `�!� �� � � u,.-, ` {'� 3 ,n ��My��''3�
+. . 5` n °� ✓ � Y� � l � � �'ki t � )r �
�"� ti s �• �� :� f�,� �*�,, '''�f�' sF� �y� dr.� F �' �, � ,�`u � �} :���
� !�� }y:�q ;' ,�� < ,Y "�{ � t ` t'�
.t � � ��
, �� �.,o�,{, � t 1�� i� �; r ,1; � ` 1� "i ���
�... ."-� r , i '�,w'� �` � 4 �,��
t n z: k �� �
¢ t. _� �� � t f ,���w�
M1 �`+ \ . 1' �(� w M � � t � J� '�{ F"��
., j� x, r�k'� � � � L ��"� ��b 1
,'z � r � - nV �. . '.�
, t;.� t.}..' r S/ � �,:_• � %C '�: f x .:: '!`1 ' _�i r {,�,� '"��,}�
� r � �,,� � � d x�-�7.
��T r ; � � .' l ,-
�� �`� � k � v 4 . � ��� IIk� ��
�` y Z # . ;�{.- � _.tf�
� �� � ,y r�`' t �l �` ��i��
r i - � _` } �, '�'
�.. . p ; ��t � ;�n � �' �. �`r��F�� �
x t � a
�t � � D' ��, �� .:�{ � Rj
r � ��� ? { � � � } 4.���� {1
� �� ��
;" 1 �` �
;. � %�,,.�_, � , �: ,� �� � ,
: ' " + �:, � � .� .' � { _'�{�� ���'�..
ti. (':. / . • "� ��' � .,� Y-0 i� ) ��
� 3 . �' �� � 1 , �'�
� t� T � A rt '"' �k, k � �' '� � L Y
f"� ,iF' r .� �.".�- •i' ��� .s, I `��t i
/, y'' _ i � �Y}. ✓.�'f",
� � � Y
� if 'i a '+�' �•h� ro'�° :
.�. ��,� �� � � *..�
� �v � � � w � `�
'�' �r �. a+ _ s `� a �C ,.,.++.. y,�,�
i '� • \ *w" . �'�� �,stS i '�,,.����i
� �y�,�.� �� �` � � s� ra �. .� � � � � �,
� , ��416"�-. �f � �'d � ; . ;t s - '''' � � f a z`�?}i
i �,� f I ,,^ /„ .1 F � ��.
-ly �`*�,�,�Y��w�'� r Y � `,l � � � �+ :�'t"�
" � '������r���l�f� ��1, �� �t�' t;s� � y�.���
�� ��� ���°����' ��. �� �' � i � ;� � �
` �t 5 W"4r Y`�"i � . . �. . ! � � / �����R�
' � ... °�. .� :y .�J4
_ �C'' C'f't�y,� ��#� t,�[�da�� d�t� '�te' 't ��1i�i��'� � t�i#' �„ �� , ,�:
4 /ii Q� •!M ) 0 � hT �
, �<
Pa�1 T ,�-���x�on Q f ��� R'��i3�i n ��#s�io�a ��� ��!��d,� � ��
��c�a�t�,��#�iq��.�e �e�c �,cont���r�e�ra►t4n� ���`F����.' ' � i �4u�
��#d+�F�'�b�� ,f f�itieS "'FiE�^ p�rt1�� :'�E�att�t!-'�t�, �`i �'�, �� � �.,
4b.fib��we:�;��tlbar�,'� � � I �, �
j . � . � F
-. . -. . Y � .spi}�
• �-� ... : , N ... I �'d �. .;i
,�it� J�?r� �'R�a� ��par� � res��tut#or� t��tng t�� ��t. , r } - ;
� : ;., � ' � �. � '�_--;;
t1fe�'y tt�tly'y�0ur&, ,;� � �,. � :3
,{ 1 •�� � <� � �.� '` ��
• t �� n : /�� ' , �r0 h �
_ { �� .I'�1F�� ]Yj�.•Y�1/r�.� ; `, '� r§ { • t" .. +` I. . } ��Y� V
� �(���G� !. � 'r' k 1 { �
M T f ��� 1 t f'�?�
� / r f �� �* - i 'R�
����� r� � z�' �� �, r �' � y� �I
� .� , ., .. : .. :. � . .. t lr_ � f � _4 � :,r����,
�rCr��, ��!i7+a���� :� �7� �w���'� ti. r t � � i ,, �
.. `e `4 � S t 1�a � i��. 7 l.�'S 2 ^{i
$' .� s �f.��� � J �� „� r r� '
q'•� l �x d . E
? \ , � �� 1n . ., � 7 .
;�'� � i l ry, ^�t�,,
- a �r.� ^, +�> ex ,,! >� I T��, '- ��
" �' r � �`L t �j t s % �� � f 3�
.': �:;t . •�� 11f�� A���'.Ip 5 ..Y � �� q..�Y�
,� ` ��'1 � T� . " {' �� X � �� y ����4..
� . .�j ��.� � �' � i. � �
. � �> x �`� ,� ' ,�:
i � . ,�����. ,.� '� • , ,.y,d
x �,;� u � � ,�d;
�� � � /' _ x`� �
�, "�: � :p, ,K �'k,
.` �� 1 �" � � �
' . � i v i ; ��: } �R ��
' ♦. I. 1�` � �� �� /� h ,.�
i.; ` , fl�i ._, p: L �
! r / x �
I G: -�
� J ;-�i - � ' � s �
� ' � :� � d �� i;, s , �
'` ' �3 ' k� fi '�
� �' s�.t ` � �� r;i
Y .�I. � rrY,_ ���
� . .
. ; . ' . ' .. . �.
r . t�
. �
� '
[
« ` �'' � � �y'er�
�, _. ,� � � ' ��•�',
. �t,� . . . , .._.. ., . •s��. .. .. ._ . . . , . '. . .. ,.. .:�ir`�-... _. ......,,..., .. t, .. F ��: wx .
. �
, , � � -
�
, JANECEK&WRIGHT
����
nrro�wevs�r uw
5fONY LAKE OFFICE PARK
245t FIFTEENTH STREET NORTHWEST
NEW BRIGHTON,MINNESOTA 55112 RECEIVED
TELEPHONE(612)631•T108
SEP 2 01988
DIANNE�RIGHT p,n���
JEANETTE JANECEK
STEVEN ANDERSON
CITY CLERK ANNA COUNIHAN
September 19, 1988
Mr. James Scheibel
President, St. Paul City Council
Room 716
City Hall
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul , MN 55102
Re: September 27 , 1988 Public Hearing regarding application for
special condition use permit filed by Familystyle of St. Paul .
Dear President Scheibel :
The St. Paul City Council is currently scheduled to
conduct a public hearing on September 27 , 1988 regarding an appeal
of the Planning Commission's decision to deny Familystyle of
St. Paul 's application for a special condition use permit to
operate community residential facilities. As you may recall ,
Familystyle went through a similar process in 1984 resulting in
City Council Resolution 84-1121 dated August 24, 1984 which
granted the special condition use permit subject to two "sunset"
conditions.
I reviewed the minutes and tapes of the 1984 proceedings
in preparation for the September 27 , 1988 public hearing and noted
circumstances that may require attention. Specifically, I am
concerned that the September 27 , 1988 public hearing will be
carried over until the next session given the full schedule faced
by the Council that particular day. Such a carry over would cause
at least two problems. First, the current special condition use
permit is scheduled to expire on October 1 , 1988 and, therefore,
the hearing should be held prior to October 1 , 1988 if at all
possible. Second� and more important, continuing the matter would
cause a great deal of inconvenience to those individuals who plan
to testify on Familystyle's behalf and are in the process of
scheduling their time around a presumed September 27 , 1988 hearing
date.
I understand the difficulties inherent to maintaining a
public hearing schedule and I am aware that circumstances often
arise that alter the schedule. However, I am requesting that the
Council consider Familystyle's particular need to conduct the
. ���.��
. .
Letter to President Scheibel
Page 2
hearing on September 27 , 1988 as scheduled and ask that the public
hearing not be carried over to the next session unless all those
present at the hearing are given the opportunity to testify.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
JAN C � WR
�
SA/kp Steven Anderson
cc: St. Paul City Clerk
Familystyle of St. Paul
�` � �
, �j � �u �)
R�``t r Y oP°r
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
� �uittnu ; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M =��� �� �o' DIVISION OF PLANNING
o �..
�s s• � �--� t 25 West Founh Streef,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102
i ,`� 612-22&3270
� �
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR � �
RECEIVED
September 22, 1988
SEP 2 31988
Albert Olson, City Clerk C+`j� CLE��
Room 386, City Hall RECEIVED
Saint Paul, MN 55102
RE: Zoning File #10379 - Familystyle of St. Paul OCT 121988
386 Duke, 383 and 397 Colborne
City Council Hearing: September 27, 1988 CITY �L�RK
PURPOSE: To apneal a decision of the Planning Commission which denied a
Special Condition Use permit to allow the continued use of three residences as
community residential facilities for mentally ill adults.
PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Deny (18-0)
ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Deny (7-0)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny
SUPPORT: Six persons spoke.
OPPOSITION: Six persons including a representative from District 9 spoke, one
letter received.
Dear Sir:
On August 18, 1988, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this special condition use permit application to allow the
continued use of three residences as community residential facilities for
mentally ill adults. Such facilities are subject to 6 conditions including a
spacing requirement of 1,320 feet. The applicant was unable to meet this
requirement and requested a modification.
At the close of the public hearing, the Committee voted 7 to 0 to deny the
Special Condition Use permit because the applicant could not meet distance
condition and did not meet the findings necessary to modify such special
conditions.
On August 26, 1988, the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's
recommendation on a unanimous voice vote.
t
September 22, 1988
Page Two
�
This appeal is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on September 27, 1988.
Please notify me by September 26, 1988, if any member of the City Council
wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing.
Sincerely,
�..�,�
�:�,r-Q-�'l ��'-"-�_.
Lisa J. Freese
City Planner
LJF:rm
Attachments
APPLICA;'ION FOR APPEAL ZONING OFFICE USE ONIY
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
� RECEIVED F; ,e � 10 3� R
� �
Application Fee S ���5� � 1,• -
SEP 1198g
Tentative Hearing Date '2
ZONING
App 1 i cat i on i s hereby made for an Appea 1 to the St. Paul City Council
under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section 2 06 , Paragraph of the oning Code
to appeal a decision made by the Board o�ng Appeals
x Planning Comnission on August 26 , 1988.
_ Zoning Administrator (date of decision)
_ Planning Administrator
_ Other
A. APPELLANT
Name Familvstyle of St. Paul, Inc. Oaytime phone 636-9177
Address 721 F,' ft-h Avan�iP u w . New Brighton, MN Zip Code 55112
B. DECISION BEING APPEALED
Zoning f i le name Familystyle of St. Paul Zoning Fi le � 10348
Property Address/Location 386 Duke, 383 Colborne, 397 Colborne
Legal description see attached Memo
C. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Use additional sheets if necessary. )
(txplain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision
or refusal made by an administrative official, or an error in fact, procedure or finding
made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the PTanning Comnission. )
�pc� attac�har� MPmn
JANEC & WR
I
If you have any questions, please contact:
i pplicant's signature
St. Pau 1 Zon i ng Of f i ce I Steven Anderson
1100 City Hall �"-.nnex ! Attorney for Familystyle
25 West Fourth Street i
Saint Paul , Minr;esota 55102 Date City agent
(298-4154) 9�82
r ` ,
/
!
�d � �� �j�
�
MEMORANDUM
� IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL BY
FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL, INC.
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBMITTED BY: Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc.
TO: St. Paul City Council
RE: Appeal of the August 26, 1988 Planning Commission
Decision To Deny Familystyle's Application For A
Special Condition Use Permit To Operate Community
Residential Facilities.
DATE: August 28, 1988
PREPARED BY: Steven Anderson , JANECEK & WRIGHT, 2451 15th St.
N.W. , New Srighton, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------
This memorandum is submitted by Familystyle of St. Paul
(hereinafter Familystyle) in support of an appeal to the St. Paul
City Council of the Planning Commission's August 26, 1988 denial
of Familystyle' s application for a special use permit to continue
operating "Community Residential Facilities" at 386 Duke, 397
Colborne, and 383 Colborne.
A. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTIES INVOLVED.
The relevant legal descriptions are as follows:
1 . 383 Colborne:
a. Legal Description:
Lot 19, Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey's Subdivision
of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of Stinson, Brown &
Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul . Together with:
The South 26-8/12 feet of Lot 2Q, Block 3, of
Stinson and Ramsey's Subdivision of the West
half of Block Sixteen ( 16) of Stinson, Brown
and Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul .
\
,
b. Number of Occupants: 13 ( living in three
apartments) . �
2. 397 Colborne.
a. Legal Description:
Lot 16, Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey's Subdivision
of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of Stinson, Brown &
Ramsey' s Addition to St. Paul .
b. Number of Occupants: 6 ( living in two
apartments)
3. 386 Duke.
a. Legal Description:
Lot 7 , Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey 's Subdivision
of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of Stinson, Brown &
Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul .
b. Number of Occupants: 4
B. BACKGROUND.
Familystyle is "Rule 36" mental heaith care provider
duly licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services to
provide 175 be�s for mentally ill persons in 24 community
residential facilities located in the West Seventh/Jefferson area
of St. Paul . Familystyle is currently operating at or near
capacity. The properties at issue in this appeal represent 23 of
Familystyle's 175 beds, or 13� of Familystyle's total capacity.
The remaining beds are located in the other 21 facilities operated
by Familystyle which pre-exited City Code incorporation of special
conditions requirements for community residential facilities and
are relevant to this appeal only by virtue of their location to
the three properties at issue.
City Counsel Resolution 84-1121 , dated August 21 , 1984,
2
� ;� '
♦
. granted Familystyle a special use permit to operate community
residential facilities at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397 Colborne
and included the following conditions:
( 3) Family Style of St. Paul , Inc. agrees to whichever
of the following two stipulations occurs first in time:
(a) Upon implementation of the dispursal (sic) law
referenced above the City may revoke the three permits under
consideration and granted hereby.
(b) If the dispursal (sic) law has not been
implemented by October 1 , 1988, the three permits hereby
granted shall terminate as of that date. (emphasis added) .
As the language of the Resolution suggests, the City Council was
clearly concerned about the ramifications of the dispersal law
when the permits were issued. Since that time, however, the
dispersal law has not been implemented by Ramsey County and,
therefore, the current special use permits expire on October 1 ,
1988.
As a result, Familystyle was faced with the choice of
closing the three facilities or seeking new special condition use
permits. Familystyle elected to apply for a new special condition
use permit for three primary reasons. If the three community
residential facilities are not allowed to continue operating,
Familystyle will experience undue hardship in loss of gross
revenue, loss of program money , and lost opportunity to use its
licenses issued by the State of Minnesota to operate the
facilities. In add��tion, the individuals currently residing in
the three facilities will also experience hardship because they
will have to leave the Familystyle programs. Finally, although
the population of inentally ill individuals fluctuates, the need
3
for the 23 beds contained in the three facilities has been
consistent in the past and will undoubtedly increase given the
enactment of the Minnesota Comprehensive Mental Health Act which
makes community residential facilities available to a larger group
of individuals.
C. THE AUGUST 18. 1988 PUBLIC HEARING.
The public hearing before the Zoning Committee was held
on August 18, 1988. Based on Familystyle's Application and
independent investigation, the Zoning Committee Staff Report
correctly concludes that Familystyle meets all special conditions
imposed upon community residential facilities by Code Sections
60.413 and 60.423 except the distance requirement. {See Finding 5 ,
Staff Report) . Consequently, the only issues addressed at the
public hearing concerned Familystyle's ability to meet the burden
created by Code Section 64. 300(4) allowing modification of the
distance requirement.
At the public hearing, Familystyle submitted a document
entitled Summary Of August 18, 1988 Oral Testimony To The Zoning
Committee (hereinafter "Summary" ) outlining each element of Code
Section 64.300(4) . The Summary and supporting testimony provided
the Zoning Committee with the following evidence:
1 ) Familystyle will experience undue financial and
professional hardship if the permits are not granted in that a
significant portion of Familystyle's gross revenues and program
money will be lost as well as Familystyle's lost opportunity to
utilize its license issued by the Department of Human
Services;
2 ) Statistical data gathered by the St. Paul Police
Department and the St. Paul Board of Realtors shows that allowing
the three facilities to continue operating is consistent with the
4
general health and welfare of the community in that property
� values have gone up and crime has gone down since Familystyle
began operating in the neighborhood; and
3) Allowing the three facilities to continue operating
does not conflict with the intent of the Ordinance given the
total circumstances surrounding the West Seventh/Jefferson area.
In short, Familystyle introduced sufficient evidence to meet its
burden under 64. 300(4) .
The evidence offered in opposition to Familystyle's
application fell into two general categories. First, testimony
was offered concerning circumstances that occurred in 1984 during
the previous round of public hearings. A representative of the
West Seventh Neighborhood Federation testified that Familystyle
and the Federation entered a written agreement which included
Familystyle's promise to vacate the three facilities in 1988 no
matter what occurred from that time forward. She did not produce
a copy of the Agreement.
Familystyle, however, did provide the Zoning Committee
with a copy of the Agreement. The Agreement does not indicate any
intent on Familystyle's part to automatically terminate the three
facilities without considering possible re-application. In fact,
the parties signing the Agreement clearly state that terminating
the three facilities would cause severe hardship. (See Appendix A,
Summary)
The second category of opposing testimony was offered by
neighbors who stated they did not appreciate alleged behavior of
some Familystyle residents such as failing to use the sidewalks,
walking as exercise , paying attention to neighborhood pets, and
their impression that crime had gone up and property values down
5
r
. . � . �-� * � .
}
��-�����
�
despite statistical data to the contrary.
Based on the evidence before it, the Zoning Committee
voted to recommend denying Familystyie's application. The
Planning Commission met on August 26, 1988 and voted to accept the
Zoning Committee's Findings and deny the permits. Familystyle now
appeals pursuant to St. Paul Code Section 64. 206 and asks that the
special condition use permits be granted based upon the
overwhelming weight of evidence in favor of granting the permit.
D. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR APPEAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 64.206.
Familystyle now appeals the Planning Commission's August
26 , 1988 denial of the application based on the following grounds:
1 . Findinq 7 Is Contrarv To The Evidence On Record.
Finding 7 suggests a misunderstanding by the Planning
Commission as to the nature of community residential facilities
which, by definition and purpose, resemble any other home zoned
for single or multifamily use. The idea behind these facilities
is to create a living situation that mirrors all other residential
environments so that the residents learn to be independent in
neighborhood surroundings. Because Familystyle has already made
all the necessary major improvements to the three homes to make �
the homes like other residences in the neighborhood and community,
very little construction would have to be done at this point in
time to "convert" the houses back to a conforming use.
However, it is still unreasonable to convert the three
facilities. The major step in "conversion" would be eliminating
the space provided in these homes for mentally ill residents and
6
. . . . L: .. - . . .
�
then selling the homes or renting the space out to far fewer
' individuals. Familystyle demonstrated at the public hearing and
through application that the unreasonableness created by such a
step is threefold. First, the City basically would be telling
Familystyle that it can not operate beds that have already been
licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services. Second,
as stated above, the loss of those 23 beds represents a 13� loss
in gross revenues for Familystyle and additional program monies
that are necessary to maintain the high quality of care provided
in the Familystyle facilities. Third, such a step would eliminate
these facilities at a time when community residential facility
space is very limited in Ramsey County.
2. Findinq 8 Is Based On An Incorrect Internretation
Of The "Intent" Of The Ordinance.
The Finding suggests that the Zoning Committee and the
Planning Commission apparently considered Minnesota Statute
Section 245A. 11 and the "over-concentration" language contained
therein. Without stating the source of its information, the
Committee found that District 9 is already "over-concentrated" and
then made two conclusions. First, over-concentration is
"detrimental to facility residents. " Second, based on these
findings relevant to over-concentration as defined by State
statute, modification of the distance requirement in the City
ordinance "does not meet the intent of the ordinance. " The
Finding is incorrect on at least two grounds.
a. The Zoni ng Commi ttee i s not the proper body for
deter-mining the best interests of inentally ill
residents living in community residential
facilities.
7
.
The Minnesota Department of Human Services is the
governmental agency best suited for determining what circumstances
are detrimental to the well being of inentally ill individuals
living in community residential facilities. The Department has
consistently licensed Familystyle to operate 175 beds in the West
Seventh/Jefferson area of Planning District 9 . Consequently , the
record suggests that the Committee and Commission improperly
assume that over-concentration is detrimental to the 23 residents
involved in the present application process.
b. The Finding improperly relies on the over-
concentration language contained in the
Minnesota Statute to establish the intent of
the distance requirement contained i� the City
Ordinance.
The Committee properly determined that Familystyle met
all special conditions required of community residential
facilities except the 1320 foot distance requirement. Nothing in
the City Ordinance deals with concentration within a Planning
District and the Committee acknowledged that Ramsey County has not
implemented a dispersal program. Based on these facts, the
Planning Commission nonetheless finds that modifying the distance
requirement is inconsistent with the " intent of the Ordinance. "
This Finding is incorrect for at least two reasons.
First, the Commission never states the intent of the
ordinance before arguing that granting the permit would be
contrary to that intent. Instead, the Commission appears to
equate the legislative intent behind the Minnesota Over-
concentration Statute with the intent of the City Council when
8
. � ��-i� ��
,
drafting the distance requirement. The net result is that the
� Commission avoids dealing with the actual intent of the ordinance
which is to keep at least 1320 feet between facilities exclusive
of any over-concentration arguments that may , or may not, apply to
facilities that pre-exist adoption of Minnesota Statute 245A. 11 .
Second, by failing to arrive at the actual intent of the
ordinance, the Committee also fails to address the real issue
inherent to Familystyle's application. Specifically, the actual
intent of the ordinance can never be met in the present instance
because 21 homes will remain in the area and are within 1320 feet
of each other. Consequently, eliminating the three facilities
will not make the area conform with the intent of the distance
requirement. Given the fact that conformity will never be
achieved in the area and, given the immediate and future need for
such facilities, the prudent course of action would appear to be
keeping the three facilities operating in an area and under
conditions that have proven highly successful in the past.
3. Findinq 9 Imvrooerlv States The Intent Of The Citv
Council When Passina Resolution 84-1121 .
The Finding is incorrect for two reasons. First,
nothing on the face of the Resolution suggests that the City
Council was giving Familystyle five years to operate the
facilities simply to eliminate hardship created by closing the
facilities and the Finding is completely void of reference to
where evidence of such intent is found, Logic indicates that any
planned "phase out" of these facilities would not require a five
year period. Rather, the language of the Resolution supports
9
Familystyle' s position that the primary purpose of the five year
period was to allow adequate time for Ramsey County to implement
a dispersal plan . If the dispersal plan was adopted prior to
October 1 , 1988, then the special condition use permit would be
reevaluate at that time. If, as ultimately occurred , no dispersal
plan was implemented, then the entire situation would be re-
evaluated in the fall of 1988.
Second, the Finding is further incorrect because it
suggests that the 1984 Resolution controls the outcome of
Familystyle's present application and requires that the new
permit can not be granted. The 1984 Resolution is relevant to the
present application only in the sense that it establishes
a specific timetable for Familystyle and the City to decide the
future of the three facilities at issue.
4. The Commission Fails To Make Adeauate
Findin9s Relevant To Section 64.206.
Finding 6 acknowledges that City Code Section 64.300(4)
controls the outcome of Familystyle' s application for the special
condition use permit and, as indicated above, Familystyle offered
a great deal of evidence relevant to 64. 300(4) . The Planning
Commission, however, completely ignored Code Section 64.300(4) ,
perhaps as a result of what appears to be an unjustified reliance
on the 1984 Resolution. For whatever reason, the Planning
Commission ignored all evidence offered by Familystyle relevant to
64.300(4) which, by the Commission's own admission , determines the
outcome of Familystyle' s application .
10
D. CONCLUSION.
For all the above-stated reasons, Familystyle asks
that the special condition use permit be granted allowing the
community residential facilities at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne, and
397 Colborne to continue operating.
Respectfully Submitted,
JANECE & W GH
Dated: August 28, 1988 Steven Anderson
Attorneys for Familystyle
11
� � � -
��'J/��.�
_ �ity of saint paul
plar�ning commission resolution
file number 8�-�3
date August 26, �988
WHEREAS, Familystyle of St. Paul, file #10348, has applied for a Special Condition
Use Permit with Modification under the provisions of Sections 60.413(5) and
64.300(d) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, for the purpose of allowing continued
use of three residences as community residential facilities for mentally ill adults
with modification of the distance requirement on property located at 386 Duke, 383
and 397 Colborne, legally described as (see attachment) ; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission on August 18, 1988, held a
public hearing at which all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard
pursuant to said application in accordance with the requirements of Section 64.300
of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and
WHEREAS, Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its
Zoning Committee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes,
made the following findings of fact:
1. Familystyle of St. Paul operates several community facilities for the mentally
ill in this neighborhood under the Minnesota Department of Human Services, Rule
36 provisions. The three facilities in question� 383 and 397 Colborne and 386
Duke Street, serve a total of 23 residents. Familystyle operates 24 separate
facilities, basically converted houses, serving a total of 175 residents in
roughly a two block area bounded by Jefferson to the north, Colborne to the
east, Palace to the south and Erie to the west.
2. T�enty-one of these facilities were established prior to the adoption of the
community residential facilities zoning ordinance in 1979 and are considered
legal nonconforming with respect to the special conditions imposed on such
facilities.
3. In 1983, the applicant requested a special condition use permit to establish the
three facilities in question. The Planning Commission unanimously denied the
permit because the facilities could not meet the 1,320 feet spacing requirement.
The applicant appealed to the City Council and the council reversed the Planning
Commission decision, granting the permit subject to five conditions.
(continued)
moved t� Morton
�i���d �/ Levy
wi�
in fav�or �nanimous (18-0)
against_____
File #10348
Page Two
Condition three of the resolution required that Familystyle agree to two
stipulations and abide by whichever one occurred first. They were: (1) upon
implementation of the dispersal law (Chapter 167, Laws of 1984) , the city may
revoke the permits for the subject properties: or (2) if the dispersal law has
not been implemented by October 1, 1988, the special condition use permit for
the subject parcels be revoked. By acceptance of the permit for these three
facilities, Familystyle concurred with the City Council's conditions.
4. The Ramsey County Plan for the dispersal of residential treatment programs
(1986) includes the following work plan item:
The department wi1I develop with Family Sty1e Homes, Inc. by December 1, 1985, a
specific pZan for the phese-out/ dispersal no later than October 1, 1988,
programs located st 383 Colborne, 397 Colborne, azid 368 Duke in accordance with
the St. Paul City CounciI resolution 84-112I.
No progress has been made for implementing this item so stipulation (2) of the
Council resolution condition is in effect and the applicant must disband the
three facilities in question by October l, 1988. The applicant seeks to
continue the operation of these three facilities by receiving a modification for
the distance condition of the special condition use permit.
5. The facilities at 397 Colborne and 386 Duke are licensed for six or fewer
residents. Such facilities are permitted in the RT-1 zoning district subject to
the condition that there is a minimum distance of 1,320 feet between facilities
(Section 60.413(5)) . The facility at 386 Colborne for 13 facility residents is
sub�ect to six conditions including the distance requirement of 1,320 feet
(Section 60.423 (5)) . The applicant is able to meet the other five conditions.
6, The Planning Commission may modify any or all special conditions when strict
application of such special conditions would unreasonably limit or prevent
otherwise lawful use of a piece of property or an existing structure and would
(continued)
� �
;,�,
!t0� '1�
�'��` ��
f.��'",..
'� �!
File #10348
Page Three
result in exceptional undue hardship to the owner of the property or structure,
provided that it will not impair the intent and purpose of such special
conditions and is consistent with health, morals, and general welfare and is
consistent with the reasonable enjoyment of the adjacent property.
7. The structures were originally constructed as one- and two-family residences and
the applicant has not demonstrated that it is unreasonable to convert them back
to a conforming use.
8. The intent of the distance requirement between community residential facilities
to avoid concentration of these types facilities in a neighborhood. The State of
Minnesota has determined that a planning district is overconcentrated if one-
half of one percent of the district's population resides in a treatment
facility.
These facilities are located in Planning District 9 and this district has over
three percent of its total population of the district living in licensed
community residential facilities. Neighborhood concentration is a detriment to
facility residents as well, who retain an institutional rather community-based
environment. Therefore, to modify the condition does meet the intent of the
ordinance.
9. The intent of the City Council decision was to give the applicant sufficient
time (five years) to make necessary arrangements to avoid both displacement of
their clients and financial hardship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission, that the
buildings at 386 Duke, 383 and 397 Colborne do not meet the required distance
between community residential facilities; and
(continued)
d � / � ��
File #10348
Page Four
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that after a public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby
finds that strict application of the special condition would not unreasonably limit
or prevent otherwise lawful use of a piece of property or an existing structure,
would not result in exceptional undue hardship to the owner of the property or
structure, and such modification will impair the intent and purpose of such special
condition and is inconsistent with the health, morals and general welfare of the
community and the enjoyment of the adjacent property; and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Commission does hereby deny the
application for a Special Condition Use Permit to allow the continued use of the
community residential facilities at 38b Duke, 383 and 397 Colborne.
File #10348
Legal Description
383 Colborne:
Lot 19, Block 3, Stinson and Ramsey's Subdivision of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of
Stinson, Brown and Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul. Together with: The South 26-8/12
feet of Lot 20, Block 3, of Stinson and Ramsey's Subdivision of the West half of
Block Sixteen (16) of Stinson, Brown and Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul.
397 Colborne:
Lot 16, Block 3, Stinson and Ramsey's Subdivision of the West 1/2 of Block lb of
Stinson, Brown and Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul.
386 Duke:
Lot 7, Block 3, Stinson and Ramsey's Subdivision of the West 1/2 of Biock 16 of
Stinson, Brown and Ramsey's Addition to St. Paul.
MINUTES OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE
� � CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ON AUGUST 18, 1988
PRESENT: Mmes. Hirte, Morton, Tracy and Zieman; Messrs. Christenson, Levy,
Neid and Repke of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Segal, Assistant City
Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Building Inspection and Design Division;
Ms. Freese, Ms. Murray and Mr. Soderholm of the Planning Division
staff.
ABSENT: None.
The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman.
Famil ►style of Saint Paul. Inc (#10348) : A Special Condition Use with
Modification for property located at 386 Duke, 383 and 397 Colborne to
continue operating three community residential facilities providing care for
23 mentally ill persons.
The applicant was present; there was opposition present at the hearing.
Ms. Freese showed slides of the sites and reviewed the staff report with a
recommendation for denial.
Mr. Steven Anderson, Janecek and Wright, 2415 - 15th Street Northwest, New
Brighton, attorney for the applicant, presented background information on �
Familystyle's 24 separate facilities, cited the issue of hardship to current
residents if three of these community facilities would be closed, and said
that the only condition they cannot meet is the distance requirement. He
summarized information which addressed findings from the August 12, 1988 staff
report. Mr. Anderson referred to zoning code section 64.300(4) and asked that
the Zoning Committee modify the 1320 foot distance requirement. He gave
details regarding the cost of alterations done to homes at 383 Colborne� 397
Colborne and 386 Duke; said that they represent 13$ of the beds maintained by
Familystyle and also represent $2,400 of monthly program money from the
Minnesota Department of Human Services; that there would be a burden on the
county, the state, and the 23 mentally ill individuals to be displaced; and
said that the program is unique, especially in that it is the only housing
available for mentally ill married couples.
Mr. Repke asked if Familystyle or Dr. Janecek purchased additional properties
and if they were rented to employees.
Jacqueline Hines, 4079 Midland Court, Eagan, Director of Familystyle,
responded affirmatively and said that those homes are located at 407 and 412
Duke.
Mr. Neid referring to the minutes of the City Council meeting dated July 17,
1984, asked if the Jeanette Janecek of the law firm Janecek and Wright is
related to Dr. James Janecek, owner of Familystyle Homes and how long his law
firm has been retained by Familystyle. Mr. Anderson responded that the
Janecek and Wright firm has been retained as the corporate counsel for
Familystyle since Familystyle incorporated in 1983 and that the Janeceks are
related.
. ;
,.,' , .
e`�,
� File #10348
Page 1�io
Mr. Repke cited community safety and inquired about the type of inentally ill
clients that are taken by Familystyle. Mr. Anderson replied affirmatively
when asked if they could be violent, if they could be nurderers or mass
murderers.
Mr. Segal asked if 383 Colborne was remodeled into a triplex. Mr. Anderson
responded that there are three separate units in that house. Mr. Segal asked
if it was remodeled illegally. Mr. Anderson said that it was purchased as a
three unit house.
Ms. Hines stated that when Familystyle took over the facilities in 1984, they
agreed to downsize from 225 to 175 mentally ill people. She said that since
that time they have been attempting to work with the West Seventh Street
Federation, have invited inspection of their facilities, but that no one has
visited from the Federation. Ms. Hines stated that Familystyle is� filled to
capacity and that they have a waiting list of 19. She said that it would be a
practical as well as emotional hardship on the mentally ill clients to be
forced from their homes.
Mr. Levy asked if the Ramsey County Human Services Agency has taken a
position. Ms. Hines said that she cannot answer on behalf of the county but
that Familystyle has continued to be licensed and that there is a lack of beds
to accommodate these clients.
Mr. Repke asked why they have not looked for accommodations outside the area.
Ms. Hines responded that it is an advantage to their clients as well as to
staff inembers to have facilities grouped in one location. Mr. Anderson added
that the "bottom line" is that they have these existing facilities.
Eric Niessen, Familystyle, stated that he has been a resident for three years
and appreciates the love, protection and guidance received.
Gail Langhall, 397 Colborne, read a letter from her husband which expressed
appreciation for the independence, respect, support, counseling and privacy
which they as a married couple have received from Familystyle.
Christine Parker, 248 Duke, said that she has observed the positive atmosphere
in which the community operates and that she is raising her seven-year old
daughter and is comfortable with the safety of the neighborhood.
John Heidelman, Familystyle, said that he was speaking on behalf of staff and
residents and asked that the three residences be kept open.
Bruce Jenkins, 412 Duke, said that the homes have been renovated, and that the
neighborhood has been improved by the presence of Familystyle.
William Anderson, 520 Jefferson, said that he purchased property at 520 and
514 Jefferson, has had 10-15 renters and that they moved because of problems
in the neighborhood which he considered to have been caused by Familystyle
residents and addressed possible devaluation of his property.
File #10348
, Page Three
Mr. Levy asked if Mr. Anderson realized that Familystyle was in the
neighborhood at the time of his real estate purchase. Mr. Anderson said that
he purchased property four years ago but was unaware of the Familystyle
facilities. He stated his concerns about overconcentration of the area.
Robert Brown, 375 Erie Street, said that he is a 23-year resident of the
neighborhood and described the four square block area as "an island out in
West Seventh" and said that Familystyle residents outnumber property owners in
that area. He addressed overconcentration of the neighborhood.
Betty Moran, 275 Oneida Street, District 9 Community Organizer, discussed the
previous District Council agreement with Familystyle.
Discussion followed regarding the date of the contract drawn up by Philip
Vilaume in 1984 and the lack of a sunset clause in the resolution. Ms. Moran
stated that the date was October 1, 1988.
Mr. Repke stated that Familystyle was allowed to operate for five years in
"what was clearly three illegal buildings."
Jim Butler, 412 Duke, said that he came to Saint Paul from Chicago, that he
has lived in the area for five years and that "there is no crime in our
neighborhood."
Lea Lydon, 323 Colborne, described situations which occur in her yard and
nearby streets, and referred to lack of supervision of Familystyle residents.
Mr. Anderson replied to comments from neighbors and said that he had never
seen a contract dated September, 1984, and that the only contract in his
possession is dated February 29, 1984. He reviewed his comments regarding
Section 64.300 and asked that the special condition use with modification be
granted.
Mr. Levy asked why the three particular addresses are needed in order to
accommodate residents. Mr. Anderson responded that the demand for mental
health services in the community is increasing and discussed the further
escalation of residential facility needs resulting from the Comprehensive
Health Act. He stated that to take away 23 beds would be a hardship for the
people in need of these services.
Ms. Hines said that their facility is unique in that it has apartments for
married couples, and that there is a waiting list for their facilities. She
described accommodations at each of the three residences.
Mr. Levy asked Ms. Hines if she was suggesting that there was never an
agreement. Ms. Hines replied that they never intended to reduce their numbers
below 175 beds.
Mr. Repke inquired if residents are asked to sign a substance abuse agreement.
Ms. Hines responded that residents do sign an agreement and if they choose not
to follow with its terms, they are given a 30 day notice to move.
��--/�"� �
File #10348
Page Four
Mr. Segal stated that it is his opinion that in 1983 or 1984 an application
was made for a special condition use permit with the distance requirement, and
when the City Council granted that request, the acceptance of that permit by
the applicant was an acceptance of those conditions.
Hearing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public portion of the
meeting.
Mr. Levy requested information on the primary reason for denial of the permit.
Ms. Freese stated that staff report findings 7, 8 and 9 particularly pertain
to reasons for denial of the modification. Mr. Neid cited the distance
requirement of 1320 feet which the applicant has not met.
Mr. Christenson made a motion to recommend denial of the Special Condition Use
Permit with a request to modify the distance requirement for the three
community residential facilities based on staff findings 1 through 9. Mr.
Repke seconded the motion.
Mr. Repke said that the neighbors tolerated an agreement to let Familystyle
remain in the three addressed homes for a limit of five years. Mr. Levy said
that his concern is overconcentration. Mr. Christenson stated that a lot has
been said about the hardship that the residents would face but in fact that
hardship is created by Familystyle who had four years to deal with the
situation. He said that it is the responsibility of Familystyle to downsize
or to relocate and the city should not be blamed for the displacement of these
23 residents.
The motion passed on a roll call vote of 7-0.
Submitted by: Approved by:
�� ��-Q- �^ , ��i���'G
G%�
Lisa Freese Gladys Morton, Chairman
�
, SUMNARY OF AUGUST 18, 1988 ORA� TESTIMONY TO THE ZONING
CONMITTEE OFFERED BY FAMILYSTYLE OF ST. PAUL AND RESPONSE TO
ZONING CONMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATED AUGUST 12, 1988.
-----------------------------------------------------------
SUBMITTED TO: Zoning Committee, City of St. Paul
SUBNITTED BY: Familystyle of St. Paul , Inc.
712 Fifth Avenue Northwest
New Brighton, Minnesota 551 �,ONtNG FILE �2��
DATED: August 18, 1988
-------------------------------------------------------------
A. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.
1 . Familystyle of St. Paul seeks special condition use
permits to operate community residential facilities at three
locations: 386 Duke, 397 Colborne, and 383 Colborne pursuant to
Code Sections 60. 413 and 60. 423 . Issuing the permits will
►�ecessitate modification of the 1320 foot distance requirement
contained in both Code provisions .
2 . Prior to 1979 and the adoption of zoning language
regarding community residential facilities , 21 homes were
purchased by Mr . Philip Robert Hillman and operated as community
residential facilities in the West Seventh/Jefferson area. The
original 21 houses are now considered legal nonconforming uses an�
are not effected by this application, Three additional houses
( 386 Duke, 383 Colborne � and 397 Colborne) were purchased by Mr,
I�illman after the zoning language change and were also operated as
community residential facilities starting in approximately 1981 .
3. In 1983 , Familystyle entered into a lease agreement
with Mr. Hillman for all 24 houses and began operating the
facilities. Familystyle learned that special use permits did not
exist for tho houses at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397 Colborne
prom�ting Mr, Hillman to apply for special condition use permits
in 1983 .
4 . At that time, the Zoning Committee unanimously
recommended granting the special use permits despite violation of
the 1320 foot distance requirement. The Planning Commission
ther� denied the special use permits contrary to Zoning Committee ' :;
recommendation. Familystyle appealed to the City Council . The
puulic hoaring was continued pending negotiations between
Familystyle and the West Seventh Federation.
5 . An agreement was reached between the Federation and
Familystyle. (Appendix A attached) . The Agreement stated in part :
Whereas , the failure to grant an extension of the
Special Condition Use Permit would disrupt the care and
° lifestyle of the current handicapped residents of these
three homes; and,
Whereas, this disruption would be a hardship to
these residents and contrary to public interest. . .
The agreement further states that the West Seventh Federation and
Familystyle agree that the three houses could remain and that
Familystyle would never have more than 24 residents in the three
homes or a total population of over 175 residents in all the
houses.
6. The ag�eement was referenced at a subsequent public
hearing before the City Council on July 17 , 1984 but additional
provision were also discussed. Dr. Janecek , speaking for
Familystyle end apparently responding to possible incorporation of
a sunset clause, stated that he could not make a commitment for
fives years tn the future. (Appendix B attached) .
7 . The City Council nonetheless passed Resolution #84-
1121 granting Familystyle the special use permits. The Resolution
indicates that Familystyle would work with County officials for
implementation of Ramsey County ' s dispersal plan and then states
that Familystyle "agrees" to whichever of the following conditions
occurs first:
(a) Upon implementation of the dispursal (sic) law
referenced above the City may revoke the three permits
under consideration and granted hereby.
(b) If the dispursal (sic) law has not been
implemented by October 1 , 1988, the three permits hereby
granted shall terminate as of that date.
8. Familystyle did not pursue the matter further at
that time electing instead to continue working with the County and
the community to determine the future needs of the mentally ill
population. The houses remain residential facilities and the
sunset clause passed by the City Council will soon take effect.
Familystyle now elects to apply for a new special condition use
permit to become effective October 1 , 1968 based on circumstances
that have transpired since the original permits were granted,
specifically: �
a. Familystyle has communicated with Ramsey County
officials, but no Dispersal Plan has been implemented.
b. The Minnesota Legislature passed the Minnesota
Comprehensive Mental Health Act thereby making community
residentiel facilities available to more mentally ill individuals;
c. The Minnesota Human Services Department has
consistently licensed the facilities at 386 Duke, 383 and 397
Colborne and Familystyle operates at near or full capacity;
2
d. Familystyle made nearly �600,000.00 of
improvements to the homes located in the West Seventh/Jefferson
area including turning 383 Colborne into a triplex and making 397
Colborne into two apartments , an office, and a community room;
e. The population needing community residential
facilities has grown and will continue to grow. There are
currently only six beds available in Ramsey County community
residential facilities meaning possible displacement of the 23
three residents currently in the three homes.
B. APPLICATION OF CODE SECTIONS 60.413 AND 60.423.
1 . The Zoning Committee Staff Report properly concludes
that Familystyle meets all special conditions contained in Code
Sections 60. 413 and 60 . 423 except the 1320 foot distance
requirement. (Staff Report, Finding 5 ) .
C. APPLICATION OF CODE SECTION 64.300(4) .
1 . A breakdown of 64 . 300(4) demonstrates that the
Zoning Committee has the discretion to modify the distance
requirement and grant the special condition use permits because
such modification can be made:
a. "when strict application of such s�ecial
conditions would unreasonablv limit or prevent otherwise lawful
use of a p i ece of propertY. "
1 . The three houses are currently operating
under all necessary licenses issued by the Minnesota Department of
Human Services. Familystyle is licensed to and approved for
operation of beds at all three houses at issue in this application
and, thus, failure to grant the special use permit would
unreasonably limit Familystyle's lawful use of their license.
b. "would result in exce�tional undue hardshi� to
the owner of such propertv. "
1 . "Undue hardship" will occur on several
levels if the special use permit is not granted, specifically:
a. Familystyle will loose 13� of its
total licensed beds and all gross revenues accompanying those
beds representing a significant financial hardship.
b. Familystyle will ioose an additional
�2 ,400. 00 of monthly program money from the Minnesota Department
of Human Services .
c . Familystyle's inability to utilize
� the three houses to provide care for 23 mentally ill individuals
3
� �'- / C � �
, combines with the overall shortage of community residential
�acilities to create an undue hardship on the Stete, Remsey
County, the City of St. Paul , and the mentally ill population in
general .
d. Familystyle is a corporation duly
organized to provide community residential care for the menta►lly
ill . To that extent, Familystyle has spent significant amounts of
money to alter 383 and 397 Colborne to facilitate this pu�pose.
Because Familystyle has no interest in becoming a landlord and
renting out residential property, the house will egain have to be
changed at substantial cost and sold.
c. "will not impair the intent and cur�ose of the
special condition . "
1 . The present situation in the West Seventh
area is unique. The intent of the 1320 foot special condition is
to disperse community residential facilities throughout the City.
However , even if this application is denied, disperssl of the
facilities in West Seventh area will not occu� because 21 houses
will remain in the area. If the intent of the special condition
can not be met no matter what happens to the three houses, then
the best course of action would be to grant the application and
allow the houses to continue providing effective, cost-efficient,
and State mandated care for the mentally ill population of the
community.
d. "i_s_consistent with health, morals and qeneral
we 1 f are of the commun i tv. "
t . The general health of the community is
promoted by the effective and reliable mental health care
Familystyle provides at these facilities, not by eliminating the
houses .
2 . The general welfare of the West Seventh/
Jefferson Community has actually improved since Famitystyle
entered the area as evidenced by the decrease in crime (Appendix
C attached) , increase in property values (Appendix D atteched) ,
and support from its closest neighbors (Appendix E attaehed) .
e. " is consistent with the reasonable enioYment of
ad.iacent �ropertv. "
1 . With one exception, all lots adjacent to the three
lots at issue are owned by Familystyle. The one exception has no
objection to Familystyle remaining in its current capacity.
D. RESPONSE TO STAFF REPORT .
1 . Clerical errors in the Report.
a. Finding 5 : 397 Colborne is licensed for 6 or fewer
4
---- -- ---- -------- ------------- - .._ _ _ - --- �
� � residents. 383 Colborne is licensed for 7 or more residents.
b. Finding 8: Familystyle is not a "treatment"
facility nor does "overconcentration" only include resident of
treatment facilities.
c. Staff Report Recommendation: 368 Duke is not at
issue in this application. �
2. Response to substantive portions of the Report.
a. Finding 3: Familystyle did not "concur" with the
conditions imposed by the City Council in Resolution �84-1121 as
evidenced by minutes from the July 17 , 1984 public hearing , but
rather� Familystyle simply chose not to challenge the conditions
after they were imposed. Familystyle's intent has always been to
maintain effective residential care in the three houses and wait
to see how dispersal is carried out by the County and to determine
the future the needs of the mentally ill population.
b. Finding ? : Familystyle clearly provides adequate
grounds for finding undo hardship within the meaning of 64. 300(4 )
as outlined on page 3 above.
c. Finding 8:
1 . The overconcentration provisions of Minn. Stat.
Sec. 245A. 11 may not be relevant to this application because the
houses were operating as community residential facilities prior to
adoption of the overconcentration provisions.
2. The State, not the Zoning Committee, is the
most appropriate forum for determining whether the concentration
in the West Seventh area is "detrimental to facility residents"
and the Department of Human Services has consistently licensed
Familystyle to operate such facilities regardless of the
concentretion because of the quality of care Familystyle provides.
d. Finding 9: Nothing on the face of the Resolution or
the City Council minutes indicates the " intent" of the City
Council when passing the sunset clause.
Respectfully Submitted:
JANECEK b WRIGHT
�
�
teven Anderson
Attorneys for Familystyle
5 .
� -� �'�'-� �� � � i
� AGREEMENT
THIS A6REEMENT , dated this �� day of February , 1984 , is
entered into between Family Style Nomes . Inc . of 740 Doctors
Professional Building , St . Paul , Minnesota 55102 , a Minnesota
corporation organized to provide health care for mentally
handicapped individuals and the West SeventM Federation , Inc . , of
265 Oneida , St . Paul , Minnesota 55102 , a non-profit Minnesota
corporation organized to provide communications to area residents
and support district planning .
WNEREAS , Family Style Homes , Inc . , provides board and care at
its facilities for mentally handicapped indivdi�uals ; and
WNEREAS , Family Style Homes , Inc . , has entered into a lease
agreement for twenty-four ( 24 ) properties in the City of St . Paul
with Philip Robert Hillman , the ow�er of the property ; and
�
WNEREAS , Philip Robert Hillman cu�rently provides board and
care to mentally handicapped individuals at these locations , some
of which hold Special �Condition Use Permits in order to comply
with Zoning �equirement ; and
WHEREAS , Family Style Homes . Inc . . wishes to continue the
service of board and ca �e cu �rently provided by Philip Robert
Nillman at 386 Duke , 383 Colborne and 397 Colborne ; and
. �
WHEREAS . a Special Condition Use Permit is required by the
City of St . Paul in o�de� to continue such services at these three •
locations ; and
WHEREAS , Philip Robert Hillman , as owner of 386 Duke , 383
Colborne and 397 Colbo�ne , applied on August 30 , 1983 , for a
Special Condition Use Permit for the above-listed premises ; and
WHEREAS , the West Seventh Federatio� , Inc . � is a non-profit
Minnesota corporation , whose purpose is the lessening of the
burdens of government , lessening neighborhood tensions , combating
community deterioration , supporting general district planning , and
providing communication resources support for community
betterment ; and
WHEREAS , that p �ior to this agreement the West Seventh
Federation , Inc . , has not suppo�ted the granting of a Special
Condition Use Permit , and
WHEREAS , the failure to grant an extension of the Special
Condition Use Permit would disrupt . the care and lifestyle of the
current handicapped residents of these three homes ; and
WHEREAS , this disruption would be a hardship to these
resiAents and contrary to the public interest ;
,
• WHEREFORE , the above-mentioned parties agree that :
1 . They are supportive to the request for an extension of
the Special Condition Use Permit for 386 Duke , 383
Colborne . and 397 Colborne ;
2 . Upon Family Style Homes , Inc , , losing its lease rights
to the above-desc�ibed property , that the Special Use
Condition Permit should be revoked ; and
3 . Family Style Homes , Inc . agrees not to place any more
residents in its twenty - four ( 24 ) homes other than
according to supervised living facility criteria
(Department of Health ) . At the present time , this is
approximately one-hundred-seventy-five ( 175 ) residents .
Fu�ther , Family Style Nomes � Inc . also agrees not to
purchase any more homes for resident living within
one-thousand-three-hundred ( 1300 ) feet of Family Style �
Homes , Inc . .�
WEST SEVENTN FEOERATION , INC . FAMILY STYLE HOMES , INC .
gy : t0�2 / //. �Q gy ;
Its �� ��i Its •
� „-�
-�?� hQl�JIES CF Ti� �UNCII. � �
, . -
10:00 A.M '
�
� July 1T, 1984 �
�
OIXAVCII. C�fAhBQ�.S - CTTY HAil. � OOURT HIX1SE i
SA�fT PAId., I�t�`90TA �
:�e meeting was called tA ord� by President Tedesoo at 10:05 A.M. �
;
P:-esent - 7 - Caa�cilmen Drew, Fletc�er, Masanz, Nicosia, Scheibel, �iils�oci, ;
?resident Tedesao �
;�b5ent - 0 - - i
�
. �
ci�al Grder for the construction and/or reconatructicn of sidewallcs cn the west i ;
side of Rice S� tYnm Cook pve. to Jessamine Ave. (p.0. 84-?56) , '
No one appeared. ( :
Cau�cilmai Masanz said he viewed the area and the sidewalk is mt bad �d he ' � ��
mwed that the order be denied ar�d withdrawi �am Council consideration. � �
A�opted. Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 �
� ,
Fi.nal Ords- far the canstructirn �nd/or reconstruction of sidewalks on parts as ' �
listed of Clear, Hubbard, E. Iowa, Jameson, Lynnhurst, Feronia, Dewey, Park ` ;
Raleigh and Virginia Streets. (P.Q $4_.$py) , I
;� one appeared in oppositi�. ;
��� ��Z �� ab°ut the or'der' on Jameson Street and Mr. Kuhfe2d of the � f �
Public Works Staff, explained that the orde�- on Jamesa� includes is�lated panels �
�th a lot of skips. .
Later in the meeting, Councilman Fletcher requested that the sidewalks on
L;'nnhurst, Feronia and DeWey be deleted fran the order and laid wer far two '
�zeks to July 31st and Camcilm� Nicosia moved approva1 of the request.
r.�opted. Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 �
��� � Masanz moved apEx�av� of the order. �
7 Nays - 0 84-921 ;
Resolution vin8 a P�''op� for a pr�ogram to finance a Multi-Family Rental i
f'.ousi:g �ev�ent (Westm3ar�ista- Apa�-tments Pro,ject). I
i�b one �peared in opposition. i
���lm� Masanz said he has received a letter lt�om District 5 favoring the � �
plan but expressir� a desit� to review the site lan and k� mwed apprwal of � .�
the resolution sub�ect to review of the site pI� pby District 5. ;
Adopted. Yeas - 7 Nays - 0 � Fi
84-9�2
A�peal of Philip Eliilman to an aetian of the Plar�ing Cocamissia� denfal of i
Special Cor�ditian Use permit for�_ �xroperty at 383 ard 397 Colbor.ne and 386 Aake '
Street. (Laid aves• trom April lgth and May 2�d.) �
Ms. James of the Planning Staff explained the history of this matter and � �
explair,ed the I,oning Bo�-d action to approve the Special Use Permit a1d the � ,
Planning Camiission action to deny the permit. a d :
� :
Philip Willia�n, att�ney �e�esent g �r•. Janecek a�d Family Style Ebme of St. '
Pail, revie�+ed the history of the ap lication a�d explafned the support they had ;
obtained a�d referre� � � ��t �� � W 7� Federation in suppor-t of � �- .
� P�1 sub�ect to certain c�nditions. He also said ape t i t ion o f 77 r�acnes !
vated�eived in �pport of their lication. Ek said the Za�ing Canmittee �
� 'ft°-aqd ha believes the Co�mcil has ; �
authorit�Y � +�PP��+� by tt�e C1ty Ca�cil,:
Cr. Janecek appeaQ-ed explained their operations and the problems of the � `�
Persons involved and t,aged favot-able oonsideration by the Coimcil. ! ; _
Several residents of Family Style Ebcnes appeared ar�d spoke in support of tbe •` :
R�it a�d ta-ged that their home not be taken array ft-ow them. ' '
(Discussian continued an followirg pege.) , �
; , -
i ,
i �
. ,
;
. � ;
� �
.1 �
Juiy 17, 198u -339-
�Discussion continued frcm previous page.)
' Deve m"ede�n�s said We are talldng about 24 homes in about a two block area with
� �nendous ca'�centratia� arid it is difficult to sell a home in the area and the
; State is against concentration. He referred to an agreement to keep the
i ProP�� at 21 hanes and said r�ow they have purchased thr-ee more which are the
t t�'ee ts�d�" consida-ation taday.
. r At the questian of Caneilman Drew, hh•. �edemus explained the State action
±� aalsideratia�concb teus invol� Councilman Fletcher explained Committee
Pv"o ed.
' ���usson�l�ffited to Camcil p�-�bel moved the publie hearing be closed
+ .
' ' ���ib�l aslced A'.�Janecdc about they relatfonship betaeen Famil
�!� �tt the.i� 7th Feder'atian atd Dr. Janecek said he fs interestxd in
�ot't� community on tr�ei�- board.
tioBer Valerttine, Director of Programs for Famil y St yle Hom e s, s a i d h e h a s m e t
�th 1�"• B t"e d e m u s s e ver a l t i mes b u t did not a t t e n d t h e W, 7 t h St, Federatiaz
`'�;�'. boar.d meetir�gs
_r. At the question of oxa�cilmaa� Scheibel� Dr. Janecek said that State I,egislation
- c�c�ires the Co�mty to c�me up with a plan relative t o concen t r at ion and at the
quest,fon of axa�c i l man Wilson, Lt. Ja�ecek explaic�ed that the
. �ii. .�p��p� � �. 8 lia�t of �75 �. �ent aith the
. Hr. Hillman a p p e a red and ex pl a i n e d h o w ��-� �� �es i n 1 9 7 0 a n d t hey
. were in terrible shape �d he e x p lained t t�e reason w h y h e had to exparid to 2 4
homea bxause of a e
c�nge in Rule 36 re8ar''ding financing
'.! At t h e q u��on � ��� Tedesco� Ntr�. Hillman ex p lained how he prop-essed
>•�- fY�om one home to 24 homes and Dr. Janecek said the dispersal law must.be
-",;.:
�� �
: . �Oota�cila�a�i Sch�bel said it should�be noted that the issue is not the care given
by Family St le Homes. He said the new Rule 36 requires acticn far dispersai of
. ���d 1'�e � the law a�d the reasonir�g for i� He said in a �
��" p esentatives will be as�dng the Co�a�c�, � visit
: v�ious type homes in neighborhoods and the Colmcil must take into xcamt that
thei^e must be a limi� He said the W. 7th Federation would like an ongoing
. relatioc�ship axl the neighborhood wants to be irnolved in the dispersal.
tbtrcflman Scheibel said he thinks the matter is close to an ia�derstanding and
_ I�. Janecek said he ca�'t bind the a�ner of the P"oP�Y to restrictions.
�'• �r�anus said the agree�ent was brok� bY � P�'�� of another hr�use and
.;.€�� Gbtr�cilman Scheibel suggested that the matter be negotiated fl�rther and laid
. arer tbr one w�eek.
� bo negotiate xith a rep�-esestative of the Ca=�il a�d
� � R�'��°�`�Cee�fti�'on five y�ear�a in the tlttia�e.
��q
; � !�'. 1�Tillia�ns said they will agree to a ane--week layav�- and request a mediator
� by the City Coea�cil.
an Scheibel moved that the matter be laid over for ane weelc to July
; 24th and he said he �ould i�ork with both sides to c.hoose a mediator�.
' �• Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
i
�1 �C�mitt�a5nd stab i� it,�4 tfl,�inctio s; a�mending the St�Paul
+ ve Code by addirg a cha�pta- �pg,
I Lai_d ove� to� lgth far Third Read�in _
� F�'st �in6 - An ordinance amending Section 33•� Subdivision 8 of the
' Refer'red to the F3�� tO �°it fees far electric� wor�c.
, 1 M=t�genent � Per�onnel Cecmittee.
� First R�dir� _ M ordinar�ce amendirg Sectian 33.04, Subdivisian 8 (t3) of ttse
` a�islative �de Pe'taining to Permit fees for warm air, heatfng, ve�tilation
ad �al �lxet metal work.
� Aefer'c�ed to the Finance, M�emerit � Persoru�el Camlittee.
1 _
� � CRIME STATISTICS
COMPARISON OF THE WEST SEVENTH/JEFFERSON AREA
TO THE ENTIRE CITY OF ST. PAUL *
ST. PAUL STATISTICS
CRI� 1983 TOTAL 1987 TOTAL PERCENTAGE
DIFFERENCE UP DOWN
Homicide �2 � 2
Rapo 230 �
Robbery �� � 230 0
A99. Asseult 773 + 56
892 1358 + 466
Resident Bur. 6927 4976
Commer. 8ur. �212 - 1951
Theft � � �25 1306 + 94
Motor V. Theft 12�g 11661 + 536
Arson 212 1511 + 293
Vandalism 292 + 80
3868 4869 + 1001
Total Crimes 29907 3 19�
+ 1884 + 6.3X
WEST SEVENTH/JEFFERSON STATISTICS **
CRIM� 1983 TOTAL 1987 TOTAL PERCENTAGE
DIFFERENCE UP DOWN
Homicide 0 0
Rape � 0
Robbery 2 + 2
A99• AssBUlt � � - 1 ,
Resident Bur. 3 8 + 5 �
16 � 9
Commer. Bur. 3 - �
Theft � + 4
Motor V. Theft 37 36 _ �
1 5 + 4 �
Arson 0 .
Vandalism 3 + 3
29 15 - 14
Total Crimes 101 100 _
� - 1 .Ox
Ranks 116 out of 198 areas of St. Paul in total crime, **�
------------------------- €
* All figures based on "Offense Summary Report, " Crime Anal sis
Unit, St. Paul Police Department. The totals for 1988 are not y
published at this time.
** The West Seventh/Jefferson area is defined as "
the Report as noted on the attached map. The area is defined#b70Stby
Clair on the north, the rail road tracks on the east, Randolph on the
south, and West Seventh on the west.
*** See "Total Offenses, City-Wide Rank of Grids" attached as
contained in the Offense Summary Report, 1980-1987 .
�'�'�/�l,�
' � POLICE CALLS
COMPARISON OF 386 DUKE, 383 AND 397 COLBORNE TO
OTHER RULE 36 COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES *
NUMBER OF POLICE
LOCATION OF NUMBER OF CALLS FROM CALLS PER
FACILITY LICENSED BEDS 1 1 87 TO 7/30/88 BED RATIO
383 Colborne 13 6 .46
397 Colborne 6 1 , 16
386 Duke 6 0 .00
97 North Oxford 36 34 , g4
1491 Sherburne 10 15 1 .50
69 Milton 22 12 . 55
1593 Hewitt 22 12 . 55
286 Marshall 99 66 .66
------------------------------
* The computer search results are attached. The computer search
was conducted by the Crime Analysis Unit of the St. Paul Police
Department.
;.
MoiN�aw o 1�ox�s•w W1
N � t�G � � N � [ O � p p � � uJ�
Q O t0 Oi � � N
W YIOfIOOtlI Nlna < �� <
-� p� � ��'! Q7 � � M ` 7133tl0�� �
W ^
< '3AY tlY3Y 311MM ^ � = j� f��
� = o '3AY tlY3Y 311MM > > ,��,6
< '
O Z i Cp � �,i�
ap o ao � � eWi oo z °� 4 0 � r�
'_ j e� a' u� U r` i °^ a oD
Q < z : � .- e ^ �
� 7 � e
a ,
000^ MiazrN ` N.�+'� z'
^ � ' ' � �r�auve pe�.� �
U � �� ^
^ � �
'tl'tl'd'N �AMyd NOQNN ^ �
CO �C � � �
M � //�
CD
s. � � � o Q � . N/
'1Q 1tlY3 Q^ W •►� `��• � O Q
'18 ltlV3 � � m Q � � a
p � •
.�-. 4'f 4'7 �7 �j e ^ 3 W � W
¢ � ►� � Qf ii Q� •, ! O'!
� W �� �7j `'�� ^ 4p�'e �� � > �
s30v�tlY = � r �Q. � �
W < '- • Q 0 W
< ^ M � i ^ W � � � �'� 11VM OOOId N tl. � U
c7 � �h �oJr � ,!i + W Z � J —
z O NOLtl3003 t� ��� � 0 P ^o � i O �
� � M � N
^ _ � � n'f � �Q'�' • ~ O• 1tl3YOtl � � O
� ` �.. a
J a s�� �Q. ,f0 ^ c P�ebP p� � ❑ 1 1 1
� 39C � 39E L'• 9� F N sr O � �� MOICNIM N •• ■
� • �� •� �� • ���• dN � o ^ bL � � � .
�_ �4f � tl tl a ^ � o ��� Y 113M =
N N N ^ .O ; �g t► � �_,� •♦ us ¢ W� /�
Z C � � W = Q
NOSII�vr F , ,' o r`�0p�b�' ^ O6> � i e Ii
\'� O NO11tlYM7
� _ � � NOBM�Yf .--e i� \` • �b
W ^ � < � a � 1: ^� O y �O �;d.� •
� 3�Itl � a � 3�itl� M�.� ^ ia'i M1111f �..
a a 3��tl �y OpO�+'j� ;, `g/���i� 1N���'pyN V/
� � M � � O � � �,f��'� p �d. �N
� � ^ � �° ^ r �
tl3193 � C tl31S3M a b' O
< • �
F � Ntl31Q3M Ntl31S3M �J 6 N �
Qf Qy = CC p Q) Q� �f� � 3
CE N � Q ��� � � � � o . Q' i 'd�
31Y0 LL V N < �� QJ �, _�` = O '�..
� S 3lYO sp 6� � t y.
d � h ^ �� ` N O
z 37Y0 a F O
< o
m N a 7 p � � � � � � � p�pr < �6 •`•
1 � o iO t tJptd, ��
r" Cp O �
��tl�1�1� YItl0191A YIb0171A n •i
� � s
¢ �` N m '� � ap � � 7 ^ t� C�p � N ��O
w = � ° 0 p'D
� O
� ��
~ � NOlONIX3l � U �� O1DN1%31 �
u=i �' V a i� ' N
¢ � _ � � O � W I � � ' � � I N I � i0 C�D i0
< � N � �O = CO f
� = O
J�—< o I ¢ � ¢ 3NIlAYH N tl�MpM
JN1�1rVM � W� W�J �
Q ! > J 6
t =
-• - < l L r i0
� N et uZi t�D O�D > > O » ^ � ^ V ^ O ^ � p = N 6�, N
0 < � r = S QV N ,+
ONIll3NS � � m a � i +Oti
ONIll3N8 �
� � � p � � � � O � N
i� GO ^ ^ �
O ! N N AYO N
� 31Atl1Y
O > 3tAtl1Y� 3Y19fl 03
V ¢ M � l^'! N9 R! M �.:..�+"1 M
� z Cp � � � ^ ^ � � � N
ON1113A3�7 7 ' N t101tld
Y
�' �� NYl3A3l Q N
> O VIIYONV� ': 4
Z N NY N � � N
t � � •� � O N N N N � �y �.
YHl ONOY/A Vtl ,� ^ ^ CD CO O �'M
N �� � O? • j� Q N a� `66`68
60 W opp , `da
^ 7e ;0^ � NVHl3d b3^I
el N • d
� OlYtl3W3 � O
�i?T,1i , i t';Si..�
, �iiY'-ri�. :%�.'��' ���� '�!(:
. _____•�r; =_ i9�T- ----
No. of �;o. of No. of
:�r'id Rank Offenses Grid Rank 0'fen�,e', Grid Rank Offen5e5
1 162 53 73 3b 26y 144 92 126
2 119 95 74 20 367 145 92 126
5 151 58 75 34 23t 146 66 161
5 151 58 )6 32 285 147 46 226
1 165 46 77 91 � 1Z4 148 44 227
8 155 59 7g 72 15U 149 102 119
9 143 66 79 g5 135 150 39 259
10 55 200 80 134 76 151 118 97
11 87 134 81 172 42 152 ]2 421
12 27 308 g2 177 36 153 1 833
13 37 268 83 88 132 160 89 129
14 112 102 84 29 305 162 129 80
15 196 S 85 15 413 163 152 60
16 131 78 86 41 23° 164 126 82
17 155 59 &7 Z6 321 165 1G0 120
18 127 81 83 5 �43 155 141 67
19 72 150 �;g 2 7ib 157 149 63
?0 187 20 gp ;3 ��3 168 122 88
21 177 36 91 �0 211 169 105 113
�2 131 18 9? 52 �^� 170 116 100
�5 104 116 9; 1�;3 1 �: 171 194 11
�6 138 69 y;; �) ;�7 172 161 54
�7 112 102 y5 25 3�0 173 i7 143
23 160 56 _;;; ?9 i�i 1 J4 124 87
Z9 117 99 yi '37 , 115 1'd5 22
30 83 137 yg g, 1�5 180 1)0 10�
31 131 18
G9 li� 3� lu�? 124 87
3? 56 189 lu0 '52 b�' 183 173 40
33 59 176 101 177 36 184 122 83
?4 51 210 10� l�lo b-i 185 127 Sl
3� 64 164 lp3 43 ?�'. if36 13a 69
�6 ta6 64 lo� a7 �c:; 187 144 65
37 57 188 105 3 621 1�8 17 143
38 74 147 " � 189 184 23
1G6 7 ;��
i9 105 113 1p7 19 3'9 192 49 217
�0 176 37 1C3 22 :5:, 193 23 361
:3 150 61 109 11 391 194 31 289
�� 152 60 110 4 551 195 150 61
�5 53 207 111 i;5 6�3 197 192 12
�6 168 44 112 �2 232 200 185 22
47 85 135 114 08 15a 202 96 145
;S 61 159 115 30 297 203 54 202
49 83 137 116 111 104 204 141 67
50 41 220 117 64 1'0� 205 197 7
51 62 110 tlg 32 285 206 190 15
52 168 44 119 35 272 207 165 46
53 40 253 120 24 338 210 190 15
54 8 515 �22 g2 138 211 105 113
55 28 306 123 79 1C2 212 114 101
�6 91 121 124 60 175 213 102 119
57 13 425 125 80 141 214 89 129
:8 75 146 126 58 178 215 164 48
�9 98 122 127 14 419 223 182 28
50 189 16 128 6 542 224 134 76
ol 109 108 129 9 477 225 192 12
52 120 90 130 44 ?27 226 180 35
�:1 92 126 131 11 4�2 230 38 254
04 69 153 132 10 4�9 240 114 39
55 95 125 i33 16 393 242 159 57
05 144 65 136 137 20 243 133 26 ---
�7 71 151 137 195 9 244 163 52
F� 80 14} �38 i21 �9 245 63 166
c9 170 43 139 170 �� 246 129 80
7� 09 153 ld2 167 1�1 249 138 69
'2 134 75 269 lEl 33
143 100 120 280 198 3
1 ~
-,����wa...- _ ..
� �;+; 386 DUKE, 383 AND 397 COLBORNE
., ,
�. . �� ; o G
" ' SFPD II\�IU��T 'r,EPG �_ " _ . � ''-�
' Y_�. .. ._ - . ._
�:;�; HII�TORY OF 0Q�383 .�.�_�u^:� '_ �-�
. FROM ID2 !•c`1i/�7 - 'U- 4".7� wti � :__
� `� �' ;� - -
;7 :�:
- �`�-' - ''r�!.''.} ... -._
�`� � - _ -
�� i..5 ��Z�� '/`r � . �� � ; - '
ATE ¢��Z�7¢: �' _ti i l=�% - � � �
�. � ��. TION :63� w ; � ? _./ �+i S�
, _ , ..
�j���;�RSONS �Z�k�4k"i z��v ����y L �'� r� :�
�'� �673 �2 LQ F����� ,��, �v' � , ���
THEFT ¢�6�'s� 4:}3�7r:_�,_� <Z,t,i�T�,/�s�
�:5:* =- ,.:� OF TRAN9MI�SION *�� E I'��I�:=^ .....,
S`�?�,� i�vCi�!�_ .-, ,�=G - -
HISTOR� C�= 4';�I�,17 i=';;_:_�:�;'�_. . - - - "_-
FRC�' ti''1/'� .� �'�j� - ...-- � � " _� �i3 �
_ ,
�RI�(� i��:J
_, . -- ' -
DOI�ESTICS :-
�2�'!�z ;�,;, t, Z`-�j: _, _
� ti.�= l :2��,'�l
� - :D OF 7RANSMISSI�lv �*� � , r _
'���.D:= ,.:;
OTHER FACILITIES
..-_._,.�,�,,,,y. <�..4i .. .... .
� x :��t X3.
C :�.iF �":. .
� � k ` SPPD I14v��E�� -�E:�un;':���� S'�3 ,.��
� ��' ' RY OF �0�+b9 �; � .�� c�,..
„z .� '`"Y ��i
'�� � FROM fbi."�"1%67 �- Z7/ ,_.:68
r.
4 �Y}� :
11��� � `:L,'u -
':.{ � .�.c — � .. . ��
x .
" .3�'4Y�' 4:. . _ _�`_L." • .
i i_. �c�_. -���_.,-�•
t Y �/ ' -
e:J Y. ��.� �. L. .1�:1� . tj 1
� � TION c���� � -�� _ � �8:� ',, . --
�� �.L 'L5 �2�.'�6�; '�?� yti,� �� _ ,� �7
� �� ..��4� .-�., � �L.+�L.�G J , i k � .,,C�. '(4 J J , � •
'� � '�#,�QI`t8 121��k?: �l l, �`;�,c �;'� ��
;,� � � �.,� . . . , � �
} .g �. �C.`J 1 1 _ �'{ -��;�,G,y: ._ ,_
f�`iON �+�`< . . - •��� �� ` .,;a7
7 ��rk� F � K��G�.v. . 1�� _�47:= .�.f . ._/ �7�
� ; : �C1b:J.i = .. v_ - � ;f,!' ��
�
� ^T� �4:7�Z, � %v .�� 1 ,"/k3 !b6
� :��� 3 � EIi7�Z'Z� �.o:t `;�'�;�, T / � �r3
. F *
�.7 �'2/
� ��"�"`���� i�iN ���t :� _�,�.L.'! . t� ,
�. � -�,a,v,
._ :�+•�-� .u.�-.-�-.-'_°_,,..1-m�,.._ ;. . .�,�,...
� . .:�.� . ; ���:., SY{�L 1.`iL 1�.1� ��i I � �-'C�� .. ; :. , .:: i _ * U �f/ C. l.� J�' . .
, �' '
HI9TORY GF +DQ�?86 "�ir= toF-:�;�� r;v ' '�
FROM Q�2/01/87 —iu— :•'-T,�,�,�;'c6
� CRIME ItiCD ., r�—c
..• .J 1-i , _
THEFT �67i �?; :Z.�437 7�1 i�'': /�s7
THEFT +Z67�= � , .. � ,�:L..; �..-_ /v�..:,/�i
MFSSINCi PERSONS ��4ti� :��l�;�z::.��i z� , .�/67
OT��R VIV�rr7 t I Oi�f `G.SYJ ._ . J.,�{�.`.J a 1 iL��. . ..�{�:'J�
AG6 ASSf�ULT �'�41iZ� �.- .. .?�_;c.� Z�: � :a i��'7
trIfi$` IN9 PERSQNS �Z+4�c� �-:-r t 7�7„ Z!: / ,.�/�,
�.�Tl'7LR -,-��al�L� �L C�t'i� , [� _ ._ j%�-7 �c!_ . �Z�87
� � FRl�V� y i'7�i '�'-_7'- '"- / :� 7
aM�83INQ `$►�RSONS z:�z4�� . - . . _-rz;� 2� .' _ F?
�&�:;`��lE AMP �t0G4 .- -,��:7� 2,=ir'.:>>7
���° I;S TU� LLS ��,.;,a �. ; , _ :
r _�S$j� ���RSQi�lS _ _ a�:./lG/a7
. 004Z+ u. r' �3�_; .:- 1:;_/_7/c7
'��IB'8��l;� �RSQNS 0�4,2► �'.-i� ���.� 0�_/;�8/37
',, • " }��tAY; 3��� s_�;{ =3856 �1:�/k��_/87
t` .
,MIS8TN0 pER80NS �.r�4¢� �:;`� ;;� 7�+ +�=/���/w7
. . .. ��tCI�//r.IV� T�..iS Li / Y� .._.0� +G.J%L._Y_�/ q�
d-
:;FO#tC2�L.� RAPE 0��� ��:� =. ..�rt �.�.�'� � ;:��
?Ee.PER �RC3W�ER t2ti�� , _ _._. . 2_ � ,;_, �'
ASS I ST F I R� Aa+!E+ iC;'�:, � ,
; _ �.. .:. . _.
NARCOTiCS L��tUGS i;ti,�: , ,- �-i,r =
�USP RC7IVITY �:::�:1 .. - ; :, - -
ASS I ST CAL.L� �t 6;; . . _� _ —
� -
Ai�ill+fAL CRL?S Q�-:,� i �,..1 , _ , _
AGG ASSAUL?' ���;' _ _;;��� �. . . . -.
INV�STIGATE k''v7ti� _ i __:i : .'= , � . . _ �
INVESTIC�?i� t2��'i'� _ _ , _
- - -�"�' - � . _ " , _
AG� ASSA'tJ_T �;�.;4: -, -
_ _ . , _ .
TNEFT �;�,�_. - _
_ � _ . _ - � ..
INVESTIGr?TE i�_�:�c� . � � _ _� � _ . :% ,
MISSINO PERSOtVS �T�41�'� i 7;_;=t::�.;_: , _ :: � r,r
AGG ASSAUL i �c�^4��� - i - __�.,_ � ;. . �;'�i
ROBBE RY �+��4 �,-, Y - � ;;,_:��' _. .=-
; _ _6:;
A5SI6T FIRE AMb +��64 �17� _ �;:.i::� �:=_ 'i�, �7
INt�E�T��iATE ��t7U' ;�"'7' �� 7i4 �z;_,' ; �,-�7
rt; s ; �.��
� ;.� .:.+ ..v - . . G'324 {.�'1�::1�-�7r7 �r'y/C'Z/�T
��` i�M 0s�a e;:���;� ��3i�_��87
= �` ��:;,� (� i -7 �y �f
.. ;y � C'6L1 L�( :.SZ�JlLt SY•�K'�.I�I
�` ���
`�1�t: �: 14�m ,:;����44 1�z��z:��e�
' i�R�- .�, F�SE 177� ti:7���;t�11 iZ/ 1�/87
�
��E���'s -°- ;AMB iD1�64 i'i; �����8 I:/tZ�/87
��1 �1�.� 0065 �7 i�•=r`��'� 1 i/Z�ti�/87
' �f��,�"'` : ��1M$ tZ��64 k17�`��:7�'3• ii/cI/87
���;; p:�MB- 0�tt64 ��'7���;.t+�9 .. �/:=:5187
'�" ., , � 48�Q� K7�E;;Z,�76 Ic/ `. =/67
�"�= t�= �+�24 �'%'�E4�32� 1�:/ 1=�/$7
�•-�� ` '�' 1Z�4�Qt ;�!f.::.'.'.�676 ti i / :.7r F38
,@�q�� SB -: St3NS t��4Q� t�::'� ; 1`���� 1 '� /��/��
. �� ;4� 7 ;... : . 1Lr�7 1 �L.�:V: lJ �' K:v� � '
����'` { ���E iL.��/�[.� '�'��t .._�.al�. �L��� ev�0'�' '
� ��ti?�, � . .... 14�L�t� _ � , � ' � T _�ry �r .
- g�;� �+ - i � i�.. � uG �
e��,�'' s.,���' iT���.7 {L+t'1-'Fa.� . _ .. . . . `t ,rv�._.y%C'„�..
��
- �fa�,'i i. �� .. � . .
ai i � '�' :,5,'
4 .�S": i P .�c fa�� .�+L> �,"ri�'f �
a 'j ' } 5
' �
t
. .Y'y� _ r'�, . ��R '�'. �.
t
,
- �T
. �`a
,'.
,�i
� 5. � �
F ,
1',�:��-'� . - � [ �<:• 5'���� .
. '� s.:
�.� ,�e,'i� '' �. � 3. }�� f�•�"s�;� .
��
MiS�:N� PER��:_..., x . , ti _ ,"
DCBB •
BURGL�R`! : __ _ . _._.
Missi�� aE�se��s . _ _ _
I NVES'.'IGRTE ,:� ,. - . �_. „ � .. _.
AJSiSY Ci'1�4J . � .. � . t _ " '" . � .
� ' ASSIST FIRE AMB �r :: -: , _ _ . ._ _ .
1�iISSI�y�, PERS�tiS :.T1 F� ) _ � -. . -�:�
SICK �'��. . _ .:: ; , ,� ., �--;
THEFT ���,_ - _, . .�:_ � __
AS8ZST GALLS z��:`� .. . . 1,_.__ _ , .�_
< AGG ASSAUL i �1�4:�:�': _ .. _- __,_�. ;i. . :,, . �s
DOMESTICS a��,-_'.. . . ::�'�4c.. %� __.
DERTH � � _ ... _ , , . - - _ . . _ _..
,?,'_'+•� �.�;
ASSIST CAL..LS I+�E�� _ _� _ _� �. � , .,..
-�'_
*t+ T��� OF •`�CRAN3MISSION ��� 6E, Ii�;�I:D��.-. :_-
y�.
...r.y�T......._' _ . . .
'�15�
s�� .. � ,.tK.`�3� .�$ �� .. ' � ' - . .. . ' _
� fi.
.. ' SPPD INCID�iv'' ,=sc�.,n..=c'f� �� _`�-'";_.r
HFSTORY �F �2593 �:E�:zTT . " ���
FROM 01/+2+. 1l87 -T��- �'��7;:.i./r.:6
CRIME ;h�.� . ::� - _.-:
O�HEk ASSAUL� ���:;�:^ _ :';^�, -�:�,�=; l u 11�.:�i7
A�.ARMS :�:,��;� �'7`:- i�.-��:r� ��.:,;� '�:�t'7
ASSIS7 FIRE AMP �''7±E;4 :'.�:;��;:,_-��7 ,•:�7iv°�=:��::,1
VAN�JALYS�' :%+:.�, �; � ��:,- �?/� ; +:„
DOM�STIC�a �.'!��; _. 7. .. , .._:1 l�i�,: ._,'�.i�
!�I S�ING PERSO�;S ���.;;, �'._. :.,.-�:��� : :; , -_ '=.�
OTf-iER ASSr�U1�T ���s7k' �. -.._ _�%;'�, : c;:_�� =[I
MIBSI}ti'E°.-i PERSQ'•�:S Z'��4k .' t , _.�:�:��.: �,"'i.� /+�;
TRA!VSPORTATIO\i :Z.�Z _� _si? "- 1
;,;:,.., �:. / . _ /.�c:
IR;VESTIGRTE +��7Z ;i- ..: �G�?, �['�='/ =' '%i�r< <
MIS5I�1� e�ERSOi�S �t����2 � .�.' y�.� : �'7;'.= .,' :�;
MISSIN� PE�S�hS �2�'�-�►:� �, '.� _. _ =+:�4 L:� , .:_�� �t3F
- - . .� �F TRaUSMISSICf� *** 1�: �:�CID���' ;'�)
SPPD INCIDE�lT Rc�^=�-'1 ���::. �'r`T'cy:
HI�3T�RY OF Q11491 SH�nFL;?��= � �,'v
FRUM �I/01/87 -�u- �2?/.��ti�6
�i,� t
GR�� INCD "�: DA�E
z� t. �
t s,�?� �t�
�rsstw� ��o+vs �r�r��z �z���z,.,���� ������87 .
� �tts��t+#��.���soNS ¢��wa �r-re.x���4 �.��i����e�
�l�,.,` ;��,"C8 �Z��31 �?���E��1�40 , ��/ '�0/S7
M�S$I �'t�DNS Zs�46 2�7Z���:.748 �r/�4/87 � '
-,.--,
i�'1�'�►"�3I "�$`QNS 0�40 u r�;�c4::,1 �Z�/c6/87
� I '�'E 0070 .�72��ck�C sZ��/�2�/87
MZ.`������ ��h�.�7 ��!44J �!�r �Zc`�.,�Ci��E3 Q:7/ 1�/�j7
�t T�7 ''��`"' •' • ' 1'�� '_��L�7
��,(� w i t:ti:�C,7�.
� ItVVE�STYGATE �+�.�;k'� . - _ .���� �,�.`;: �;37
�issir� ��ssoNS �z;4�r _ . _ ; �:?-. ��;�:_����
M.I93It�G FERSLitiS i?:�c�:�^ . � : . -:,_-,��� . :i,� _ _ ,•8T
.T�iE�;�'� �.��k�� . - _. _ ,z _�; _�. �a 7
MI83,�NG;��80R=S �:�:���+� : . � _:.� _. �. �_ ��3�
IIVVES��'�ATE f',�.,i_ _ .. �� [ r k" ���
M I SS I NC#��SDti� �:ti- _ � ,_ ;_ �7 i:,` , �,,��
�#'e�'a r
�:� T�ANSM���IO�V *�� i� . ,. �-- , _
.
�. ., ,
,.,,��.��;:� �
�. �
� .1 , .�L__s,�.�._�_._.
� ��„����-�`����'. ,"�;e;. . . ._ ,�;; ...
, ' .-. ... .� ,....,,... _
1 W w�:..�"(' .. Z�.�C '. ,7 .. , � ; . .
� . �-!,C..:� .. .. . .. .. . .. , .' . . .
. �,,'7��";;: � ° '
,r ..- .
� . ,
�; S�+l��S:`IGATE _ . , -
_ _ . +� . . �.i 1�7
INVESTI GR"'�
� I�+tVEST I uR'"E , �. : � , � , ?7
^Ta,�p /�cr' � � � ., i��;
`�,;M 4f?�.ri�- I'1GiSF1l_� .� �_ y__ .'. . .. .� '. _ i '�. .. i�iu�
'� _,�vEBT I GAT� ';. -t �' _
� jTHEFT _ � ; ; ,
-r � � . , 7
�RECOV �PRQpER��� �n a..` . . � �•
- � — . .. � , �- ? � , ;�-�.
� � � �RerzviT�� , : _ , _ , _
: �� - _ �.� , , . ,i
,; ,�At.IS� : t . F _
• « � ,. - T.. �i i ;-r
��I�INQ;; PERSGN�; �:;ti.•:.�= , ��. � .. ., � �:7
;A�.2�SoI3+1G PERSQ;�S �f,, : _
�., .,. y:���:� : _ �� i��= i - �"
DOBS -. - _ ti� �::7
t)TMER L`YGiAT i L�a .��v-4 . ,_ ,� �.' , �/:7
^ �+ � � �c ; � /���
' ✓Q��7 _ •'s �� . - _
. . � . ., . � +c.�_,, 1�v%
1r;iaSIlV� �ERSG�� ,f_', . -
,�.���r _ _ , ..��'
' '`�' - - . . T
t+���SItiG PCfi�� � k: .. .
iIVV�S'IG�`� �
MISSI�:u FERS��.� ;� � - _ _ _ _.
I I�t1-�ST?G.�i E _ � � !
ti , , _... i_' i'_: r
t'�lISS�NG �'Ef�S�:.�S ._ �. r� _ . .. Z L. ;4 r
a1�SIz.S'CIGaTF ;R,;i .'y^ a _. � ' �.
c'�Q�S _ _ ___ ; i ,_.;
s�': ... - - t . , .� - �
- M�3�Z�l3 �ER5C".S _ , . "r
JGBS ,�::�.-,.. , . , __.
RCBE�E�cY 1;� A. . _ . � i _ i
_. _ _ . .. , .. . . ,
;'�rSSING PERSG"4S i{:�-c _ ._ _ ...' ! , .� � �
:�3SSIhu^ PERS���� �:ti.:,;� ._,._�,._ .. _� k ti�.
r
OTHER ASSA��;.,_. '� =_'ti : ��'i,t ;i:;�
THcFT �•�:�.�� .:._. . __ ._ � I�`c;,�:�/t�t3
� THEFT �.��- - - - Z� ,��._i
t3t�
At3T{fl THcF 7 � :�7 ;t : sZ��":/ a��'�
. � 1i71'rF t . � �C.�C:iyJ� . ' .. ._fi+'i� �L+/T�+��i�O
�NVLatICA"'� 1�:?7�^ . . �7/a��/�&
�: .« . _ _ _
��`
� �����<
�; ��
� . •� :.� • ;.'tj � 'l°- � .. .
Q� �R��r���Q� iF�F�E .5-• _."��.. ..__ . _.
` a
_.. ���s '� ���v �
�'�" �f � � ' . . .� . .
:F. +f_'.� f3,�. . . . . . . . ...
t a .
' � �, s . "'i. ..;i:� �LfR.,. . .
� ��� t,g', � � . ' '. S� � ' .
,�+ a '.t A , y'.. }��•,�� y, �•
�` y� ' €. , ' �So; .. .
�' 4. � '�':.. �.� i "` . . .
f y' '��`'� -
} t
3� R..�� � . .. � .
d h .,,e n �':;:
^,,r.; ',,r;., v . *
.:r ', q✓! , .':..` . 2
. •
�� . ��.. � � . ..
e. '_ �, . ,. ; . . t
�.,�. � . ' ..
L � , , _ � .�
} � ��.
- �k � �� �` i� �. . _�.
� `, �� � -�
�v�'''-� �.. � '��,,��, � ��_: ,� � , �:_ ";�f};,;
>� � 3`.b;a �, �� -. ;�;. ' � � �'
a ,�y y 7_. q {!!,� '.
4�• � x F . . t .' ` �'� ���.:.
,- -' '
z�����- �. �•r f `� < t .'.� � . J;t�:f}, ���j �t, ti
.
` k �
'__.�--..ssy:.. :.. , -¢c� '. : . .... .. ... .. ... . .. .. � � o
. ..',.....,____ ` � �� . k ;.^
..— -- --. _. _., .,.. ,...,�.....-. . L _..r.��.. ..
- .,..:.aM'.i.. �
, ��' �u-•�•a.
_ : h�i.�_�. . .
Y
• O �'/ `�" '� �
PROPERTY VALUES
COMPARISON OF HOMECROFT/WEST SEVENTH AREA TO
HIGHLAND SOUTH, AND DOWNTOWN ( 1 )
AVERAGE SALE � QF
AREA P_ RICE (2) 1985 1986 1987 1988 CHANGE
Homecroft/
West seventh (Z3Y13
on Map attached) 48.5 50. 1 47 . 5 53 . 1 + 8,g �
Highland South (Z3Y12
on Map attached) 76 . 7 74. 1 73. 2 NA (3) - 4.5 %
Downtown (Z3Y14 on
Map attached) 69 .8 NA (4 ) 46 .0 48. 8 - 30.0 %
-------------------------
( 1 ) Based on statistics gathered by St. Paul Area Board of
Realtors. The statistic8 are attached and relevant portions are
highlighted. The Board of Realtors breaks the City into several zones.
The sale price of all single family homes sold in a given zone are
added together and divided by the number of homes sold to arrive at an
average sale price for that particular zone. The map attached shows
the areas cited above. The Homecroft/West Seventh area (Z3Y13)
includes the Familystyle tocation and is circled in black on the map.
The other two ereas are just north and just south of the West Seventh
area.
(2) Figures shown are in thousands.
(3) Not Applicable. The Highlend South figure is not available
for 1988 because the Board changed the reporting area by incorporating
into a larger category known as Highland. Consequently, the � of change
in Highland South shown above is based on a comparison of 1985 and 1987
figures.
(4) The Downtown figure for 1986 is 34. 9 but is based on only two
sales for the entire year and, therefore, is statistically inaccurate.
, MARKETABILITY OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN WEST SEVENTH AREA ( 1 )
COMPARISON OF AVERAGE LIST PRICE VS. AVERAGE SALE PRICE
FOR 1988 SALES
AVERAGE LIST AVERAGE SA�E % OF LISTING
AREA PRICE PRICE PRICE RECEIVED
Homecroft/
West Seventh �55, 154.00 $53 , 122 . 00 96 . 31�
Downtown a51 , 562 .00 $48,822 . 00 94. 68�
Highland South (statistics not available for 1988)
AVERAGE DAYS ON MARKET BEFORE SALE
AVERAGE NUMBER OF DAYS
AREA ON MARKET BEFORE SA�E
Homecroft/
West Seventh (2) 69 . 57
Downtown (3) 91 . 15
Other Typical Areas �
Crocus Hill (4) 72 .00
St. Anthony Park/
Midway (5) 55 .44
------------------------------
( 1 ) Based on the attached statistics gathered by the St.
Paul Area Board of Realtors.
(2 ) Area number 738 on attached chart.
(3) Area number 742 on attached chart.
(4) Area number 740 on attached chart.
(5 ) Area number 746 on attached chart.
- -;. _
- - . __ _
_ ..T ' ' . ' -. �': . _. _ _ ' ' "__
._, • •i'
- • . .u . � � .,'.�i p,�-_._�-��i :+e _
. , ��
. ° '� �. 1 /�-'s�_� _�` C :
. _ � N 6Gf'� � t�
a... _ � - `` C. t. � •/� � 1�` �
� � y � ,� ^� / ' j !-�%- R31` ,, ,,.`. ��a
_._ � i�': 4 ��' : - � / { I �� '�
��./
j_ . _ � `� 6� .- � �. �� �. � .• �tC(_�ciLs .
�� 'T te "�t - _ .. / .r^ ` �3 � ` __ °�..i �;. `E. �.{ Es-�1
� . . . _ O � •w '8` '`� � Jc��` Z � � /- t,f��'�a. '+ �,� `F i ` c'IK'
--" r i, � ! �1 � S " +,� � 1�.,
. � -, .i� �."�'-�l',�� r t� �V/� ��� ��'�wi i .. -,'- i°"'� J.-�t ...s:i�-
.. .
' _�� _� �n T � . . �P� .aiF��� � .. � �. =•f3L..Q � jr
''� . �''R b� • ' �`". -� _ -�:'�':' }i: a �." -c
:. . , .
- �: - r.s �.•.• F 1�, , ,� __
..a" . L 7j l�' �,�.y� �ti ;..,r_�s.r� , � � F
- -- �: - :ei�7� ��r:s�.�. „'��..�.. '-„�. �
�:tic. \�Y�� -- ..s�'� . �iz ?�.w,� �s .u. � � �
. . .�„
. . � ., ,�,w _ _ . . , . .
`
-:_= . \ !, .o_, M , w.z;sn.
� +-�'t' .r;.. �` t��:� �i �ss� ;�� -�",�-„�.,�,_-..-_�-.; ���+.J�r' r� , -
_ _ r � �.,,z _�. �--- r"4
___ �� - y. � - �-`- !, �-� �-+,�
. ,
• ° f t � .� ' -'� ��
.r.�,s , ..,,. � � .
, ,
� . .
.
_ : .
- - � -�-��s ` ,> ,. , .�• t ., `^,` � �,r; -t
•
- - _ - ` �t �' - 4- ' °x
T — 4 !� �� �-�,.�'f y� •t��� " +�-��-�+�--[�E��'
. ." __ "1(- . V �r`- S M�0 .-��;����' ..� •
S A � - �t�� \ __ � a � �,
. __ _ _ _ �� �; �t �I� � ur � �f'A yT�''!�-��•_iz ', •� �,��t:
_ - � y ��.• :jJ 3 .—�j�i �' � + - �C`` �I�Y_� •�- i � .
_ _ 1 ° j� �t �� � l�—"�4�� p�� ( �
. � _�� �Y 2mli� ��� • • _ +y " � {: � �y •ef• *' �' v`�,� � 1.1 •• ..
_ .- � � 'o • „ r �s h •.� � =�+
�_ �•�.U. L�LG J ��.�: - t-
� �4w "3' �y 'j _ - '�ae� \ � � � � 1 .��� �ry ' '_
• � — � s>.` l� I k � �{ , � , ` . '� � t� - ... � �_ _ k
- - `�• � � !:_ Y:�. 1�'' •� 3. � ..� ., . �O J�'•'
. _+ .r _ -plr3 -_ •� .�"t F �.� �� \\\ �l. '� ���r�.. 1� `�'Gr�
�� ?' _1L � � ` � : -�. �� �RV, �: �• � i` E
• �i.�,. .� ...+r _ �� .3 .. ' n�T .,• � .i4� � �j � .'� .. , `� v+
r : ,6F � � � � ._y -. � r s5 l� ..\ I
- __a�:.r� � - � 5 � �, �� �� ;� �:i��� 3t. \�. ,n�'-'�lYl
_ � �p��� . - � ':� y..L_ 1,_� �.��e�� cS F . �� s�''�{� ....
—__.,....:ae.�. ��F� ..a. .-{Y .L-� � f'. °^ �\`.,4 eR��_y"",�R--�
-- � _„�� �s "t��a 2:�.l _ ���= M, .k. I�k� ,.'%�� _ �`' "�
k' � - ' ��� � •` ..� �
-� r" i � Q _���_�it�^h �• '; 5_ ' '�w,�' `/ •n•�.b �-�{ - �a.
, i�� '�i 4 uS � � ���!.`� -
_> - :� �,:� �e . . _ - • � h-► ��'� � �
- �, �' •� .��H _�.u_�=y� j ` ��` �-�r f- o�;' _
-- + �;� � 5 _ i� ,s -Z� -�„` L�,� ' • t��
— + :j � r _ �_�`'�Ei_ --1rI • _ . �� �y \
- " = a�i. ` �'�, 'ocK:�' ':N i � °;' �>� ,� - ��=' ,� � _ _ ' !..� �'�1.
_ - ' �� ,r. e „ •� �1�`�
_._-� . , . .� _ _ f� _ _� _ �.` I
• � - . `
_.-- -� � +r' " :n. �. ;r k�a ` i. u .� . .� � .
� .�-:+ - - j�� ` •�.-� _ �r.� � •..Y�1.ti, .`-�`• �ra-_'-�, �........••.s r. ; .'�fr� � � .
- .,.
�
�p � � �; „ , �r �
; , ( . s , � +�. ;�
_ — - I Y \ 1 ,� r�- °u<inr � u ss� 1! �- 5 ---� � 'yu-L- � , � _ �_ • = .�i
t li� .n.. f J i • r r .. - s, ;"�- ,�� '� y� �y'r-,r.,
• � . . `t-_,`"� . . �v�t� !-�� r f' �!1: ��
;iy..,�,,_i � - :�"{ er� ':.? �' � '��f ._ �" __ •�`�"
�f t�C.L. � �rl� s - � # -i�.',� � � E � //'
---- � • `� .. - -r�- Y- / � ...�.. �e��?�_ s � -- ��, .�:� .t��� :�e -�,� �
_ � o � �• Y J•� . .., , . � ,aMe-• _a
} � �y=, a � �r,��"��� �'�ri� ` �� �tv-. , � �� �..� .n�..�.p;T `''`�. � aJ. �. � �
t r � �`� '�� ''� c"sz `yu_ ��� i � ! �yv�''. �
- .L �.�. �Y ('7 9/��` � J. . . `« f!'� •C '{ . _"'. � /
�, r
_ *_ I •.��,,�. �.�L I1. i� i.i��C�,��s � ���� � ��..t .�i_�n "T+�o T�-4_ 4 j � .�� `y .�.
:r yy���. �;+��e 'i�' ��---- � ..t �� _�_��.�_. ,.� Y • .
si�- i`6,,� ��1� s'�' _ ..- _ �� -_--_1 �c.'ax ,---"vw!
�t� +�- � �' ��"``� � �! '�, �,' � •i . �---
� `��L` �r.. •. w o" D � .�'� '- ��+. '—�-��� .�i
"— -�'8i�1 Y.`� 1 — k _,'f! ` 4_t'Y�' , '{ '�' �- ��a`�`�. . i�w.� . . f� J .f
� .. E'.. �� = i, �� i -
--� � • 1-:--� :�..< — '�._ - . .•" - -
pro � J _
� l Ft'
,
•s- ' is I'` '-��'✓`1�,rk,s:�Y �i► 1- /��--�L-��. _ _ ___ ----�-�- -�'�____1�_"'E3"' __ .
- .
**fl ' n -�r a �?� y � -'--' _��- - _ .,
, ,'
- -.� , / �a* t.s ��:' 1 -
.Y• �� �'- .. �,�
� � � • .� :�s 9.'� — +,, ---�---F-u=-_��`,��' - �� —
--- . ��;-,��.--,,��,,�,� .;.��_`. --� —�. ,.. � -- ��"-�, �
- �r "F, r," �� �-- "`�F%�e - -�=- � - > { �, - - -
---- ;..LS . , � �--�-'��� t � L ` ' ,�._.___�=-= . ' ��` ' --- ." '�_'1 _..
—�-+Xic- --��,��'� ` �-c� i�_ -t �� s i. ,, t.,- � '. ���= a u
- '� 'L._� �'� -..% rr�, �t �..�xT__i J
-n�',- � ..:.�«._i� 1� �W .
� � � � _
� O �
1
- � ._" "_ . _ . . � _.���� ..
�� / ��
• '�rj rE4P•TO-D�TE SUr�tARr DF S�IES �C1IVI1r i0R S1 ►�Ul ►REI
, CL�SSi�AE� l S . s OF Ol�l DDI.�R : 0� �VG S1l �Vu L:S. AV6 1 L CO- 011� t
� P p R
SIMG�E f�1111� RESIDENTIAI 6,E38 79.5 558.767.0 8� 0 8t � 91 � !8 1 06 3,601 307,07).0 55.0
` IOtr01 S�. ANtNONr P�RK 39 6 3,768 2 6 83 8 9t i 91 0 7t 18 1,�33.3 �3.1
20�r02 M�►k NE CO��EGE �RE� 52 .S 2.9t0.6 5 56 0 59 � Y�.) �03 27 1,ae5 � S1.0
• 101�03 MIDw� SOUTH t5 1.2 ♦,598 � 8 Sa 1 55 9• 96 7 80 �1 Z,I?5 2 S�.)
2Div01 COMO MEST 07 1.3 S,B91 t 1 t 6?.7 �0 ? 96 � 63 57 3.514 3 6�.!
20�r05 COnO E�St 98 t.� 6,55? 5 �.1 66 9 �0 5 8�.9 7i 6t �,15t.3 63 3
Z01Y06 COMO SOUTM �1 6 2,�06.1 � 58 1 6t � 9E.0 )3 17 1,06E.E �1.�
IOir07 NORiH CENTRAt a6 .7 2,s�e.6 .5 56.8 5? ? 10� � �i5 �t !68 3 33.1
ZDtYOE MID CENTRAI 70 t.0 3,257.6 6 t6 5 50 0 93 0 tt8 18 l89.6 27.�
Z01Y09 SDU1N CENTqAi 58 .9 2,177.g .� 12 7 �7 C 90.8 104 19 l38.0 33.E
101�10 C�PITAL MEIGNiS 1 22.D 22 0 ?6 5 tt.8 51
I 10?r0� Pw��EN NOR1►wESt 86 1.3 5,�55.5 .9 6i.� 6a.� 9• 8 B3 �5 2.1�3.3 S� �
� 202Y0? PMAIEN NORTME�ST 50 .7 3,105.6 .6 62.1 65 Q � 95.5 71 27 1,615.0 53.0
t0Ir03 PNAIEN SDUTNUEST 49 .7 2,372.1 .� ag e 5� � g� y �pg �g g64.8 �0.�
102Y0� PM�IEN SOUTNEAST 63 9 3,176.6 .6 50 < 51.? I 95.7 78 23 1,230 0 3E.)
' 102Y05 NILICRESi 110 1.6 6,621.7 1.2 6G.? 6E B 90 1 73 53 3,IB9.0 19.7
I ZOIY06 M�ZEI P�RK 2t1 3.1 1�,693 1 2.3 59 3 62.2 95.3 BO 103 6,072.3 47.t
202r07 DAV10N'S lIUFF 86 1.3 4,261.7 B �9 6 5� 7 I 95.9 71 35 1,735.3 �0.)
203Y01 TO�MY � COUNTRr 26 1 1,9?<.3 .3 )4 D 7E ) 96 5 95 12 S�7 7 W 1
203Y01 MERAIAM iRK CENTRAL 57 8 3,599.7 6 63 1 66 i 95 3 95 19 1,951.6 51.i
103r03 MERRIAM PRK EAST 3� 5 1,926.9 3 62 2 6a � 96.6 )1 1� 710.5 37.1
Z03Y01 MACiGROVEIAND WEST 200 2.9 16,2D1.3 2.9 81 0 89 6 90 a 69 125 iD,369.6 6�.0
203Y05 MACiGAOYElANO EAST 135 2.0 9,178.6 1 J 69.8 71 9 95.8 8E 88 6,039.0 6�.1
203r06 CROCUSrRAMSEY NIII 116 1.7 11,1?3.2 �.2 t0a.5 117.t 93.1 1D9 70 7,750.9 63.8
103r07 NIVER ROAO AREA 39 .6 1,72a.0 .9 �2�.� 13t 5 92 � 8� 23 2,584.6 5�.7
203Y08 S1 CAIHERINE'S 50 .7 4,S�O t 8 91.a 95 : I 96.1 67 32 2,920.9 d3.i
� 103Y09 CRETIN�DERNAM �4 .6 1,990.6 5 68 0 7C.a 96 6 65 32 2.ta6.7 71.8
Z03Y10 MSGNlANO VILIAGE 89 1.3 ),939.5 1.� 89 ? t03 4 I 86 3 90 57 5,155.3 6�.9
203r11 EOGCUnBE�ST. DENNIS 25 .� ?,809 7 5 �t2 0 �23 5 9t.0 B3 16 t,803.I 6�.?
I 203Y12 NIGML�ND SOUTN 5� 8 4,139.7 7 76 7 81.� 94.0 76 29 2,?66 0 5�.7
Z03T13 MOMFCADFT 41ES1 7TN )1 1.0 3,<63 0 6 CB B 5E.6 � 85.9 84 �8 1,159.9 12.�
� Z03Y11 ODuN�OGIN 349 0 .t 69 8 ?5 a
� ZDtY01 MOUNDS PRRK � 25 .3 t,t?E 2 2 56 U 5E 5 � 92 6 34 � ��5.0 33.G
� 20�Y0� 84TT�E CPEEK I 95 2 86 8 �79.3 �C.B
104r0? PCINT OOUG:4S �� 6 4i63a 2 8 �7 2 81 ; � 95 3 9i 34 2.6a2.1 57.L
� ?89 D B �02 1 68 . 11; J J5 21 1.712.7 41.3
iC5Y01.R?YERYIEGIE-SiRYKR) ?7 d 1,333 4 ? <9 4 51 ' � 93.7 104 1? 578 9 !3 �
� ZQSvO? CHERDAEEfu-STRYMP� �9 4 1,629 g 3 56 1 5E E 95 6 86 1D 582.9 35 !
� 43 4 �? 4 45 9 � Sa.6 30
I08YOt NEw BPIGNTON 152 2.2 ta,835.1 Z.7 9i 6 t0:.7 � 95.1 73 97 9.�62.2 62 �
208r02 AqDEN H1LLS g0 t.3 t0,d83 5 1.9 1t6 5 123 � � 94.d 67 55 6,544 4 62.1
ZOBY03 �UATIE IAKE �REA 2e .4 2,547.4 5 t06.1 110.� � 95.9 70 16 1,71t.0 6).2
IOBr01 SNOAEVIEu NOFTH 125 t.B 12,590 7 2 3 t00.7 105 � l 95.9 JO Bt 8,3�5.3 66.3
I08Y05 SNOREV1Eu SOU1M 1D8 1.6 10,53B.5 1.9 97.6 11G-� 88.5 71 6d 6,546.1 62.�
IOBYD6 MOUNDSVIEu 71 1.0 5,334.0 1.G 75 t 7E � 1 96.2 9� 47 3,458.4 6�.6
208Y07 ST. AN',NONt VILLRGE ti 3 1,SOE B 3 89.8 1P�.' I 88.� 64
2Q9Y01 NOpTM OA�iS 70 1 D t4,417 8 2 6 2DE 0 225 0 91.5 157 44 10.075.9 72.7
109r0? VADN4IS NEIGHTS 92 1.a 8,388 6 1.5 9t.? ye � ' 96.5 7q 63 6,D11 � �1.7
209Y�3 IITTIE CAhAGA �4 6 4,2C1.4 8 95.5 t�6 E � 89.e 98 IE 3.0�< 3 72.5
2tDY02 IW�ERQ�EE�HTS 44 6 3,643 7 7 82.8 1G2 ? � B0.5 6E 2) 2,364.) 6� 9
?4 •� 1,606.7 .3 66.9 70.< 95.2 4� 15 1,051.5 65 6
Z10Y03 RDSEYILLE NORTNWESi 45 .7 3,9t3 7 .7 87 Q 9t.7 � 91.9 68 26 2,29E.8 58 )
2�OrD� ROSEVIIIE NOFTHE4ST 127 1.9 11,86�.7 2 1 93 < t0<.0 � 89.8 BB 76 6,9�8.9 58.3 `
2�Or05 ROSEVI�IE SOUT►prEST 5� 8 5,8�0 6 �.0 107.8 10C.3 �0).5 H9 30 2,9g1.t 51.a
210Y06 ROSEVIILE SOUINE�S1 81 1.2 6,6B3 8 1.� 79.fi B2 5 96.1 67 55 ♦,436.4 66.�
I 2111'0� YMITE BEAR Tui 128 1.9 t0,D8<.8 1.8 78 B 83.5 91.4 68 66 5.?59.) 52.2
111r02 INiITE BE�R BCM.DEII a� 6 6,239 3 1.1 ta6 6 t55.� 93.2 B5 20 3,tt9 7 5G.5
Z11Y03 MAH!,41ILLERNSE.BRCN 10d 1.5 6,986.7 1.6 86.4 9t.1 91.8 93 55 5,035.6 56 0
:11r0• WHITE BE�R LKE,BELI 332 1.9 26,131.2 1.7 78.� 90.7 86 8 7? 778 1�,307.9 5�.6
' 1>>rD5 GE!+ I�KE 1 45 9 95 9 95 9 �00.0 7
112r0� M�oiEu00D NUaTN t72 2.5 12,757 5 2.3 �a.2 77 E 95 6 79 95 6.Q53.0 53.�
It?YOI NOATM ST PAUI 10B 2.2 10,193.9 1.8 6F.9 7t.� 96.5 )6 7� 5,095.1 SO.D
i T�?r03 M�►��EWOOD E►St 75 �.1 5,90a.0 t.i 76.7 82 3 95.6 t05 36 1,l32.4 �E.O
I��rOi PI� SPR2NGS 1D .2 1.3�6 i .2 13� 6 �a0.% 9:.� ?7 2 170.0 12.6
� 2��r0� uKE EtMO �5 .J t,89� 5 .9 t08 B t�a 5 45.� i30 Z7 3,161.3 6�.6
ItIr03 OAKD�LE U1 2.1 11,gaB 8 2 1 Ba.7 83 E 70� e 78 75 6,193.6 5�.�
I15Y01 YOODBURY NORTM 26 1 2,625.4 5 101.0 107 6 93.E 10� 13 1,222.7 46.6
, 215Y02 MOODBURY SDUTH 105 1.5 11,532.1 2.1 109.8 1t< t 96.3 723 62 6,700.? 58.1
� i15r03 �t00DBURr YESi 9� �.4 10,4E1.8 1.9 �ii.5 i�a 2 97 7 g6 57 6.6�2.6 63.�
� Z16Y01 NE:I�ORT 31 5 1,239.0 .1 71 ? 7� 3 � 9E.9 B5 11 )87.1 35.2
2t6r02 S1. P�ul PARK 57 8 3,680.7 .7 6a 6 6E 6 96.5 76 35 Z,Y50.2 61.�
� 216r03 LOtT�LE 6ROVE 28a 4.2 2i,796.a 3.? 76 7 �€.5 � 9' E 59 u2 �0,83� 7 49.)
2�6r0� 6REr C10U0 ISLAND 5 �' 358 2 � �� 6 73 � 9�.8 32 ?� 2t2 � 59.2
217YOt COLUMBUSIANOK� LNT1 36 5� 2,88t.0 5 BG 0 8< : ; 94 5 107 17I 1,383 3 46.0
Z17�02 YrprIING 31 5 �,095.9 ♦ 67 6 66 - �t01.3 9� t♦ 956.0 15.6
217Y03 41Y(1►lING TW 17 3 1.174.8 I 6S t )t G � 9�.3 65 9 58?.2 50.0
I1TYQ� FORESI IAKE 91 t.3 5,949.7 1.1 65 4 66 ' i 95 2 85 13 3,030.• 50.9
I Z»r05 FOAEST L4RE Tc� 87 1 3 7,7�0.? t.� BE 7 93 ? � g5 i !28 55 5,007.1 6�.9
I17YD6 NEW SCANCIA TWP 25 1 2,315.2 t 92 6 9?.a ; 95 1 tt3 9 900.5 38.9
117Y07 MUGO 35 5 2.85'.6 .5 81.6 85.t 9, 9 12� 21 1,855.0 6�.9
, 1»Y08 MAr T1� �9 � 5,725.5 .9 1�6 ? �i2 E `t56 J ii> >0 3,�79 1 62.0
Z17Y09 MARIME 14 4 2,500.3 .5 10t 2 110 E � 54.7 136 B' 773 9 31.G
' 2;7r10 GAAN1 TNP 2� 3 1.461.0 e 1t?.? �27 e 52.D 1ta 9 1,088.0 u.2
21EYU1 STILIYATER TWP 27 4 3,305.? 6 t22 a 155 1 � 78.9 12? 10 t,tt8.3 33.8
ItSY02 STIILWATEF 197 2.8 15,163.8 2.7 79.0 132.d I 55.6 B6 83 J,18�.) ♦7.•
21EY03 OAKPRK 11GNTS-BAYPRT 37 5 2,515.8 5 ( 68.0 265.1 f �5.7 76 13 960.3 38.I
j 11EY04 B�YTOWk TWP ) 1 608.9 i B? G 91 3 � 95 3 1?E 4 311.9 56.2
21eYQ5 Y. LAKfIAND TW 27 .4 ?,903.3 .5 10%.5 5DO t � 21.5 113 17 1,71�.7 60.1
218Y06 IKLND,SNOR,S.Ck,S.M t0 .6 3,141.e .6 I 7¢ 5 E2 B � 54.8 81 2t 1,673 7 53.3
21SY07 AFTON ?Z 3 2,378.5 4 I 108 t SSB.S i 19.4 104 9 1,104.5 46.1
218YOE DE M1ARK TNP 3 326.5 1 1D6.8 113.8 95 6 113 Y 206.5 63.3
221YD1 HEST S1. PAUI 50 .7 d.231.3 .8 I @4 6 89.8 94.2 92 31 I.517.6 6Q.2
221V02 ME�OT� HEIGHTS � ^ 7,?38 3 1.� 16E.2 154.z 7C9.1 tOG 26 3,906.5 50.5
221Y03 SUNFISM LAKE 7 1 2,237.0 .4 I 319.6 32E 9 97.2 5E 4 1,465.0 65.5
2ItY01 SOU1N ST, PAUL 55 8 3.623-7 7 65 9 65 3 I 95 1 79 32 2.080 7 57./
1211'05 TNVER GROVE MEIGMiS 42 .b 3,759 3 7 89.5 93 1 9E.2 92 I3 2,175.• 57.8
221r06 rE NDDTA��ILrDA�E 3 15� 5 50 5 60 2 � 83.9 68
Z21r01 EAGAk 15 � 1,5�3.4 3 t0a ? 1DB C 97.t 86 9 9�0 9 61.7
1 Z23Y01 BURMSVILLE 2 221 9 111 C t13 0 I 96 2 159 2I �21 9 10D 0
PMi 0�
i
- _� .
�9 g�? 1'EAU-tO-D�tE Surruar Oc S��ES �Cilvlrr F011 =1. ►� ��
CIASii�REA l t Al LLA t �VG Al �V L V f L CD- OIIA s 0
_ p p
' SING�E FAM:Ir RESIGENTI�I 1,5lS 7P.5 7�S,t18.5 l3.6 EE.E 90.� t5.5 6E 1.1�9 �09,580 9 55 Q
20�r0� Sl. �MtMpNr ��AK 68 s 5,5a8.� .7 8� 6 E5.5 i5.� �3 3? ?,646 � �' �
ZOtv02 M�1K NE COIIEGE ANEA 63 .7 3,779 9 5 60 0 61.) 87.1 73 �C I.�37 : 6� S
IOtrC3 11IDY4v SOUTM t?3 1.1 7,125 7 1.0 SB 0 60 1 96.• 71 69 �.135 6 St t
?OtrO� CDI'tC YES1 125 1 5 8.760.0 t.� 70 1 )�.0 97.� 41 )3 5.12C 0� S5 6
20��05 COMO E�S1 117 1.7 tp,�6? ♦� 1.� 7t : 73.! 96.1 61 !6 6,189 � 55 1
IO�r06 [OMO SOUTN 18 .6 2,735 7 � 5� 0 59 3 86.� 7� 17 gyc.3l �E i
10�r07 NpN*N CENTR�I 50 6 2,726 2I .� i Sa 5 5?.3 95.i 57 �7 �,003 S� 3E E
:01Y08 MIO CENTqAI 75 .9 3,790 9� .5 SG 5 52.5 Y6.1 69 ?• 1,301 D� ?a �
ZO�r09 SOUTN CEN1R�, e5 1.0 �,10> >� 6 �6 3 52 1 92.7 93 3G �,SaC t� 3' S
10:�0� PM�IEN NDRTNYfST 115 1.3 7,0�'.1' 1.0 6t 3 63.6 96.3 �8 73 �.SE� t 6� ¢
:07r0: PM��EN NORTMEAST 6a B 3,982 8 5 62 2 64.8 96.� 6� 3� 2.iaE ' S; 5
'01r03 �n►�EN SOU�w�ESi e8 1.0 �,623 a .6 52 5 55.1 85.3 70 39 i.�%� EI �- �
10:r0� PN�:EN SOUINE�S? 50 6 2,83�.t, � 56 ' S9.0 96.0 85 ?1 �,�5� ' <: �
20?Y0: MJIICREST 173 Z.0 10,78�.a1 t.5 6i 3 61.6 96.5 57 95 6,04; 1� Si C
2G2rpE MA.'EL p�p� 217 I.8 �a.713.0� 2.0 I 6G 8 62.5 9�.3 69 t�6 ',80E
;C:rO' D�r�ON'S BWFr �0� 1.3 5,60< Oj 8 S� a I Se 1 gg.� gn �5 1.�0_ �� i: 9
Z03r0� TprIN � COUNTRf 38 ./ �,?O8 6� a 7� )� 1 96.? 60 ?3 .,67E "� 6� 5
203r02 MERRIAh PRK CENTqAI �4 5 3.1�9 � .I 7t 6 �5.0 l5.� 65 31 i,i�i.��
203�03 MERRIAr, PpK EAST I9 .6 2,9�5.2 .� 6G.1 64.1 93.8 88 25 t,555 ?� S: 9
Z03r0� 11�[iGROVELANC YEST 22B 2.7 19,197.� 2.6 85.5 88.2 97.D u 137 1?;t1'.E E: i
Z03r05 Iu'.�GAOVEIAND EAST 166 t.� �2,774.8 1.7 77.0 79.9 96.3 SI 105 ),84� �I E• •
ZD3rD6 CNDCUt�R�MtEr NILI 122 1.1 t3,B00.6 i.9 i13 i 1�8 � 95.5 81 6a 7,35E a� S; ?
203r0� R1vER ROAD �REe IZ S 6,03� t .8 i�; 6 t19.3 96.2 47 25 :.�5e S� 5' 3
Z03rOB S1 CATMERINE'S E♦ 1.0 6.052.0 1.1 95 9 98.7 B).t 5� 55 5.1�E GI E� :
Z03�09 LRETIMiDERHAM 67 .) 4,BIt t .� )8 t 80 9 96.5 5� 4t 3,703 c' 6f ?
203�10 NIGNL►ND VILIAGE 96 1.1 8,79B.2 i.Z 9t.6 96.0 95.1 �9 50 �,E2`_ tI ;t 8
.03rti EDGCU+1BEiSt DENNIS 28 .3 3,810.7 .5 136 1 142.6 95.� 51 15 i,00� E :: E
ZD?r�2 MIGNI�►NC SOUtH 55 6 �,D�6 5 6 7�.� 77.5 95.I 56 )8 ?,e5� 3I :� 3
103n 3 Ma1FCRDFT wESi 7TM B7 1.0 i,359 0 .6 50 � 53.3 9�.0 5? 3? �,6:. 6 3' C
Z�3Y1� pO�N*W�k 2 69 �
3a 9 37.� 93.2 92 1 3?.S� 5: e
IO�vO? MOUNDS v�R1i ?� 3 t,269 6 .2 52.9 56.9 93.0 81 9 e76.G� 3' _
IDav02 BATt�E CREEK 67 8 5,475 5 7 B� 7 85.0 96.2 6? 31 ?.�;'.; �j 5
IG�r03 PO1Ni DDUGI�S �3 .5 3,Ba 7I .5 89.� 93.1 96.t �0� ?5 ?,?a� a 5: �
205YOt RIVERV:E�IE-STRrKR; 28 .3 1,513.0 .2 Sa.O 56.� 95.8 69 10 54B 5 3E i
:OSYp2 CNEFOKEEI�-STRYKRI 28 3 1,755 6� .2 62.� 6C_9 96.7 B3 22 1,3�G � 7E �
1 1.12.OI 11? 0 117.5 95.3 )1
20B�D1 IEN BqIGNTOti i90 2.2 18,1?5.7 2.5 97.0 101.2 95.8 6� tt7 tt,t4'.A 6: 5
I06r02 ANDEN NILLS 92 1.1 12,173.7 1.6 132.3 138.3 95.7 59 57 7.55a.8 62 s
208Y03 1URT�E IAKE ARE� S6 .7 6,636 9 .9 118.5 122.3 96.9 62 39 �,636.1 65 5
ZOer04 SNOREVIE►I NORTM t59 1.9 t7,695.2 2.� t11.3 107.8 103.2 70 96 10.�3's.E 5' E
2GBv05 SNDREVIE� S011TN 12) 1.5 14,632.7 2.0 1t5.2 13D.6 EB.Z 55 86 9.Ead.S E' �
2DBr06 NDUNDSVIE� 97 1.1 1t,707.6 1.6 t20.7 t24.6 96.9 5a 60 a,6E:.5 3� ?
208Y07 S1. ANTMONI' VILIAGE 3a .1 3,a43.9 .5 �0�.3 t05.8 95.8 aa 7t 2,�OE.� E� :
109r01 MORT►+ O�KS 59 .7 13,455.3 1.8 I2e.t 240.2 95.0 175 39 8,)5�.3 6� �
109v02 VAOMnIS NfI6NTS 118 1.4 t1,69E.3 1.6 99.1 102.0 9).2 59 83 ?.BCE.L 5E '
209rC3 11TTlE C�NADA 46 .5 a,664.0) .6 tOt.a 105.1 96.5 76 2a i,S?' o. 55 "
Z10r01 FAICON NEIGMIS !6 .5 ♦,�13.G .6 91.E 94.9 96.5 55 3G i.)65.5I 6'_ '
Z10Y02 L�UDERDiIIE 31 ./ 2,017.1 .3 65.� 6)J 96.1 86 18 '..2Ci.6f 55 6
:10V03 ROSEVI�LE MORT►WEST 37 .1 3,�39.1 .5 93.0 97.0 95.9 56 2a :,i9E 3� E: 5
Z10V0� RDSEYILLE MORTMEAST 167 2.D 15,Ba al 2.1 g<.g g9 2 95.6 60 ttl t0.t5'.E; 6e ; '
2�Or05 ROSEVI�LE SOUT►wESi g1 1,1 9,2�C.9 �.2 I �0�.2 �06.1 95.� 53 5a 5.E?E.S� 6� �
Ztp�Q6 ROSEVIIIE SOUTMEASI )g .8 13,68C 81 t.9 �t75.� 180.8 97.2 5� �B ?,995 't 2E 6
211�01 IMITE BEAR TYP 117 1.) 13,05E 1� 1 8 I 88 E 96.� 92.1 72 89 �,85< 41 6: '
Zitr02 1N1TE SEUt 6CN,DEII 78 .9 9,711 ? 1.3 � t1a.5 136 5 81.2 65 �5 5.t0E 3I 5: E
IttY03 MAMT,WIIIERMIE.BR�N 12� 1,� 11,438.5 1.5 9i.? 95.8 96.3 82 66 S,E?E E •5 6
111Y0� WITE BEAR �[E,BEII 342 1.0 28,73).t 3.9 Ba C 87.6 95.9 I 53 ?03 1).53E ?I 6� L
Z>>r05 6En IAKE 13 .2 �,503 8 .2 �t5 ? 1?3.6 83.6 ( 9� t� �,�5? t 9f '
111Y01 MAPlEYD00 MOA1M ?OE �.t 16,70�.2 2.� 8G.3 82.7 9�.1 6Y 123 10,06L.3� 6L 2
21?v02 MOFT11 ST. iAUt 153 1.! 1t,058 6 1.5 )2.3 � 7t 8 86.6 � 52 B8 E.?3i t� 5' ? �
112rp; HAP�EUODD E�S1 )2 .8 5,777 0 .8 Bb 2 83.3 86.� 79 � a� 3.�9E 3' 6L S
114Y0� /lME SPqI11Gi ) .1 898.0 .1 12E 3 131.0 Y5.7 59 1 �ti.5 11 S
2�ar0� l�cE E�r�p 5� .7 6,7�8.1 .9 1i6.9 125 E 9�.5 100 35 �.i6� :� 6� S '
2 u Y03 OArD��E 192 1.2 15.88? 9 2.1 8?.7 Q3.6 i9.0 19 91 ).sE'.9� !' G ;
215Y01 YpDDBURY MORTN 39 .5 5,589.4 .! 1t?.3 119.1 86.2 135 �8 3,86E.)I 6B i
Z15Y02 YDODBURY SOUTM 155 t.Q 17.18�.7 ^.3 110.9 11�.6 96.7 )4 9B 10,�7C � 6L 5
'15Y03 YDODBJRY I�S1 �e .e 8,�17 6 1.1 117.a 11g.� g8.t Bi 40 �.6f: 5� 5' '
116Ypt IEYPORT �6 5 3.695.9 .5 EG.3 03.8 i5.8 8? ?3 ?,CCS i� 5� s
Z16VC2 Si P�U� ►ARk 5� .6 3,6)B.6 .5 66.+ 69.9 87.5 65 28 !.B<5 E SG ? '
Zt6r0? CGTiAGF 6ROVE 4I9 5.0 35,96G 0 4.8 83.e 8�.0 89.E 56 209 1),72� 2� �7 S
Z16r0� 611Er ClOUD ISI�ND 10 .1 854 1 .1 �5.a 88.0 81.1 )3 7 6�c ♦ �E �
Z�7r0� COtUNBUSfANO�A CNT� 56 ) I,6D2.2 .6 81 2 Q5.6 i6.0 56 30 2,�!3 9 5? �
'�7r0? YvOMiNG St .6 3.962.4 .5 7'.? 7g.6 i7.6 BZ 30 Z,?35.3 SE 5
Z�?r03 �rOh:N� T1� 30 .1 2,055.5 .3 6E 5 70.? i7.6 6> >6 �.!3' � 5� �
2 R Y0� fOREST L�KE 106 1.2 7.t15.6 t.D 7C 0 72.1 96.) 68 53 3,67? B 45 5
21'YD5 fORFSI l+1KE T41� 115 1.3 9.�52.5 1.3 62.� 92.1 �9.Z B1 67 S,SBE.G 5� ' �
.'17Y06 AEiI SC4NDIA T1�IP 39 .5 3.112.0 4 79.E 81.0 i5.0 )2 21 �,85E t 59 E
a'i�Y07 NU60 !8 .6 4,011.• .5 83.6 l9.9 Y3.0 6t
217�08 1ur THP 21 .2 1.87).6 .3 89.� gi.1 45.0 9� �) ��725 5 3E 5
2f7r09 NARINE 19 .2 1.6s8.1 .� 86.8 92.3 91.0 94 8 735 a a� 5
117Y10 CRANT 14F �9 . .3 3,452.6 .5 1t9.' 126.5 Y1.1 92 17 1,96: 9 5E E
Z1aV01 TiJIIWATER TYP 27 .3 2.701.5 .� tOQ t 125.3 78.9 103 12 �,tg2 2 �a -
ItlY01 STILLYA�EN 253 3.0 11.54D.1 2.9 85 t 8�.8 E9.7 73 119 tG,76i 5 SC C
Z1t�03 OAKPRK MGHTS-BAYPRI 10 .5 2,J89.6 • 69.% 72.1 Y6.7 St �1 t,IgE-� 53 E
ilptlOt lAYTOYN Ti� � .1 865.8 .1 123.% 132.1 93.♦ 81 1 t75.3 54 8
21EVD5 Y. IAKEIAND TYP 16 .2 1,B85.8 .3 tt7.9 125 3 91.1 139 11 t,39�.� 73 !
21QY06 LKLND,SkOR.S.Cx.i.M 56 .7 5,031.3 .7 e5.e 93.8 85.7 B3 31 2,E3E.2 52 s
218Y07 �FTON 2� .3 2.953.9 .1 123.' 130 8 9�.1 103 6 679.1 Z3 C
21lV00 OEIHARK Ti� 4 .1 666.9 .t 166.J 176.6 9�.1 86 4 666 9 10G C
Z?1Y01 IEST ST. PAUI 72 .8 5.804 J 8 80.E E5.1 Y1.4 82 50 �.072.1 70 2
Z21Y02 IEMDOT4 1�76NTS 55 .i t,00�.3 t.t � 1�5.6 157.2 i2.6 80 35 5,379.3 6).1
I21r03 lIIMF2TM LAKE a .i 1,�5B.5 .2 36a.6 517.5 T0.5 3D6 1 8?.5 5 J
221Y01 SOUTN SS. PIUI 77 .9 5.019.5 7 65.? 67.2 Y7.1 62 47 3.tE�.2 63 C
Z211'QS IMVEP CROYE MEIGMiS 53 .6 4,635.1 .6 87.5 90.0 97.� 6• 35 i,968.9 64 �
Z22Y01 EA6AN 1I .2 1.906.7 .3 112.3 119.5 81.0 07 13 t,318.7 69 t
222V02 IIOIEMOUNT 1 68.0 66.0 68.0 100.0 IB 1 6E.D 100 C
Z23Y01 WRqSYIILE 2 160.8 BO.� 81.4 yB.E 90 1 9'.0 56 6
Z23Y02 A►/LE Y�LIEY 1 .1 31t.1 7E.6 Q2.9 D1.8 50 3 22t.5 �0 S
_ �
SPMi Gt
rEA�-tO-DAiE SUi7wa� pc SA�ES ACtIViTr apA S1 ►�u� �RE� ,qQ'7
V /
� CI�ST�A�E► L R L ll� s AVG ►l AVG L V t l lLA t
, _ SINGIE FAMII� �EtIDENTIAI 7.�21 �e.e �06,961.3 !1 0 !9 ? Y3.7 l5.3 60 1,152 �Y7,)20./ 56.3
20�r01 ii. ANTMONt� �ANR a2 .5 3.57t.! .5 E5 0 !8 6 86 0 �9 Zi �,7p� � a� �
201�02 M�MINE COLLECE AREA 53 .� 7.097.0 .� 58 � 61.1 e�.e 1� 2) 1,555 0 5: 7
201�03 MID��� SOUTM 13! 1.7 l,099 3 1.? SB ) 61.6 YS 3 79
201�0� COMD YES� 105 1.3 ),3�9.5 1.0 70 D 71.5 97 0 Ig �� �.095 6 f_ �
IOtYDS C� EAS� 110 1.1 0.016 • 1 1 72 g ��.� 97.5 56 6t �,315.9 S! 7
ZO�r06 COnO SOUTH 2,356.2 --__3 57 5 73.7 78 0 7p �' 6,1�� 7 • �
�t .5
IO1r07 I�RTM CENTRAL 41 .6 2,7g6.6 3 5� 5 58 7 92 9 75 �9 1,0�8 � �? !
101�08 MID CENTR�I 70 1.D 3,5l5 1 5 16 D 48.7 P� 1 05 27 1,I80 3 ?� �
iD1r09 SOU1N CENTRA, 70 .9 3,316 1 .5 �� � SD 9 83 1 10B
25 1,3D7 3 J5 �
IO�r10 CAPItA; ME16MiS > >7 0 �? D 3�.9 3i 7 SC �
102Y01 PMRLEN NOR�lN�Si 101 1.S 6.791.1 L 0 67 7 69.0 97.5 68 58� 1.017.) 53.2
Z02�02 iM��EN NORTME�St 57 .) 3.948.� .6 69 3 71.) 96 6 6? I ��� �,Za� 7 c� y
102Y03 PN�LEN SOUTM�ES1 6E .9 3,411.8 5 50 6 52.9 95.8 E� 35 1,8�1.6 :: 6
102v0� PNAIEN SOUTNE�ST 53 .7 Z,p16 7 I 53 ' S7.6 93.2 78 27� 1,50�-1 '.: 8
10?�05 MIIICNEbT i)6 Z.I tt,�79.� 1.6 65 7 67.0 97.3 6� �oai 6.72i ) :e 6
102r06 N�ZE: PARK 225 Z.B 13,158 5 1.9 59 B 62 1 96.3 82 119� 7,160 6 :3 2
. 10?�07 O��iON'S ltUFF S) 1.1 1,374.1 .6 50 3 51.8 97.0 7J c �
203Y0� TW�N � COUNiR� 37 .5 9.2�D.5 5 87 6 91.? 95 0 ,3 25 1.300.6 �_
23 1,802.� E 8
203�02 MEReI�M PRK CEN?RAt �0 .5 3,II3 OI � 7E 1 81.1 96.3 �9 2� 1,l59.5 '_4 5
Z03�D3 (�NRIAM ►RK EASi 19 .6 1.i53.2 • 60 3 63.3 95 2 t09 2� 1,388.6 �'.0
203r0� MAC�6pOVELAND MEST 172 2.2 U,79g,1 2.1 86 0 E6.7 96 9 12 119 10,506 6 't.0
203r05 M►Cr6ROVElAND EAS1 1�6 1.8 11,270.2 1.6 7i ? 79.8 96 7 51 g� 7,��7 4 �� �
Z03r06 CROCUSiR�MSEr NIIL 12� 1.6 13.286 1 1.9 10% � tt3.9 94 � 87 56 6,590.1 �S 6
203�07 RIVER ROAO ARE� 37 .5 6,t13 5 9 16� 5 176 3 93 9 5� 26 1,911 3 !C )
203Y08 S1 CAIHERINE'S 66 .8 5.261 9 �.j 9' 9 I 99 3 9E 6 36 IB �,5��.8 �5 8
203r09 CRETINiDERNaM 75 � 82.3 96 9 56 �a 3,67t.3 i=. @
203r10 HI6HL4N0 V1LlAGE eo i.01 7,359.3I 1 0 9? C 9:.5 96 4 51 50 1,618.7 E: B
C203r1t ED'uCUMBE/ST. DENNIS 31 t 4,626 �' ' t�9 ' 15�.9 94.6 59 17 c
203YtI NIGM^�ND SOUTN 13 .5 3.1�9 5i 5 �3 ? 7' l 95 0 5� 26 ' l.Ba2 2 5? �
103r13 MOMf�ROFi YESi 7TM 95 1.� �.512 0, 6 �' S 50 E 93 9 7t a0 1,958 7 t; �
Z03r11 DDYNTOUN 2 9? 0� a6 D 55 0 83 6 63 1
Z01vpt MOUNDS pARK 29 � .1 1,)99 3I 3 6? 0 64 6 96 � B3 7 44?.�I ,a c
IDarO? BATiLE CREEK ' BE 5 89.5 96 7 76 �
20ar03 POINT DOUGIAS 3� I 4 3.039 ?� a 36 3,0%5 9 E�
89 4 94.0 97.2 9i 17 t.5�9.3 5: G
IO�y01 RIVERVIEUIE-$TRYKR► 3a � l,gt6 �� ; 5E a 5B 4 96.5 t0a ]7 865 ? '_ �
20��07 CHEROKEEIY-STRVKR� 36 5 ?,DI' 9 3 56 9 59.5 95.7 9Q 17 gpg � as �
ZDEr01 NEu BAIGNTON 2tI ?.7 Z?,18< 1 3.7 1D6 � 109.8 96.d 56 121 • 12,590 5 :E C
208�Oi ARDEN MILLS 86 1.1 11,094.0 1.6 129.0 13�.8 95.7 64 19 6,01� 9 Sa :
ZOBr03 TURiLE LAKE ANEA 51 .6 6,�56 0 .9 1?6 6 149.1 8d 9 77
� 36 �,542 1 7: �
08rD� SNOREVIEu NORiH 159 1.0 19,115.3 2 8 122 i 1?a.6 98.0 6U �13 14,267 8
208�05 SNOREYIEW SOUTN 103 1.3 10.862 2 1.5 105 5 it).9 B9.I �5 fi9 7,�3�.9 EE E
ZOBY06 MOUNDSYIEW 7/ .9 5.739 0� .8 BO 8 83.D 97 � 55 4� - �
3,BS6 6 E:
ZOBVO� S1. �NTMONY VILI�GE 25 .3 ?.153.8 .� 98 � t01.2 9).0 8B 15 1,391 6 '_: '
109yD� MOATH O�KS 53 .7 i?,O�i 8 1.7 2?7 8 1ai.5 9< 3 �aD 3� 7,39a � f� :
Z09r02 V��NAIS MEIGNTS 11� 1.5 21.711 3 3 2 191 t 197.1 98.5 57
209r03 LITTLE CAIU04 15 .6 �,a8� 2 6 95 7 tOa.D 95 9 5g �3 9.�E9 6 �_ <
11DrOt FALCOh MEI6MTS 48 .6 1,�94.3 6 93 6 9J.� 96 2 �o ?j 2�jgj j i �
1 2�Or01 L�UOERD4LE 18 .1 1.266 5 .2 �O e 71 5 97.1 17 9 663 � S' �
! ItOrO] ROSEVIIIE MORTMYEST 35 .• 3,�58.8 .5 98 8 103.i 95 8 69 1g i,7E; 5 E' C
Z10r0� ROSEVIILE NORIMEAST 155 �.0 15,)10 1 2.2 10� � 105.0 96 6 55 ti05 10,630 3 t' '
210Y05 ROSEY1llE SOUT►IYEST 65 .8 6.l15.5 .9 98 � 101.1 91.7 15 � It 3,86t.3 f_ 1
110Y06 RDSEYILLE SOUTMEAST 6� .9 5.705.0 .B 85 t 87.6 97 ? 5? � 49 1,30C E 7'S �
Zt�v01 INIITE lE�R TWF 108 1.1 t0.E37.1 1.5 tOC 3 103.8 9E � 59 ( 66 6,669.6 t•.5
1>>r0? YnITE BEAR BCN,DEIt �8 1.0 t0.Et2.3 1.5 �3e 6 15C.? 92 3 85 I a6 5,7)� 0 53 �
It1v03 H�MT,MILIERNIE,lRCM 109 1.1 11,683.2 1.7 t07 i 129.1 B3 0 8i 59 5,E65 8 := �
It�rO� IMI�E lE�R IKE,lEII 296 3.7 21.703.6 3.5 83 7 85.6 57 8 54 � 181 15,168.) E' 3
Z�1r05 6En LAKE 8 .� t.1S3.2 .1 i�a t 16E.) E6 5 ii; i
I1?r01 H�P�EH000 NORTN 217 ' 2.� 1B,196 3 2.6 85 8 8E a g7 1 5g 12B 10.801 3 S �
It?r02 MORTM Si. PAU: 113 1.� 10.33i_t 1 5 72 3 )4.? 97 1 5� � 08 6,344 7 E' �
212r03 M�tP�EM00D EAST 78 1.0 7,432.B � � 9: 3 98.7 9� 0 6� � 47 3,E92.1 :, �
111r01 ►INE SPRINGS 6 .1 1,u7 8 .2 19i.3 �96 1 9?.6 6°. � 2 361 0 7� 5
Z1Ir07 IAKE ELMG IS .6 5.5Z� 8 .B �22 6 �28.6 95 5 B6 23 2,80Z.2 S: 7
It1Y03 DAKO�IE iB8 2.4 16.�01.9 2.3 8?.? 93.0 93 B 18 106 S,l62 � 5� C
215�01 YOODBURY NORiH 35 � � 6.394 6 9 18i � 186.8 97.8 95 21 3,ezo.� SS B
Ii5Y01 YOO�BURY SOUTM 138 1.) 15.955 6 1.3 �15 6 118.5 97 6 83 79 0,965 7 't �
115Y03 YOOOBUAII YESt ♦e � .6 �.00� 1 E 91 0 91 5 99 5 50
216�01 NEWORI 2e 2,563 � E� C
•0 5 3.076 5� � )E ? Bt t 94 8 6E 22 1,629 3 5_ C
• I16�0? ST. YAUI �ARK 70 9 l.905 5 � , 7p t 71.' 97.2 �5 � ?%I 1.941.6 ?5 E
216r03 COtt�6E 6ROVE 368 I 1.7 32,12Q tI 1.5 8' 3 89 � 97 6 tE ' 168� 13,6D1 0 �_ C
Z16rD� 6REr C�OUD ISL�ND 13 ' .2I 1,0�� �; .? E2 a � 85.9 9E C 63 I 81 700 3 E� ?
Z17�01 COLU�IBUSI�MOK� CN11 6I I .8 5.172.�1 B 85 G 8�.0 9? 8 19
It)r02 YYOMIN' � I 3i� 3,t9J.6 . E: "
1)Y03 YYOMING 14F 3C 4 2.52).9, 4 84 . 86.8 9' t 64 I
? i8; t,6t2-3 E:.E
2' I .3 2,159 6 3 BC D 82.2 97.3 6? � 15 1.256 6 '.=_.2
Zt)rD� fORESi UKF )a � .g S.t62 1 B 73 6 77 0 95 9 6E ! ��) 3.291.9 E= 3
211rD5 FORESi LAKE iln 110 j t.� 10.1�9.4 t.5 93 2 95 J 97 � 65 I 6<' 6,197.5I E:.S
I11Y06 MEY SL�MDIA T4F 3� .� 3.EtZ.B 5 t12 1 111.7 95 3 10' 19 1.091 0 �: .
117Y07 NUGD 35 � .1 �,06�.9 6 116 1 t21.9 95.3 87 Z3 2.583.9 E= 6
ZtIYpD MAr TYP 2? ,3 2,03a.7 3 9�.5 96.0 94 a 56 10 078 3 �. �
21)YD9 MRINE 9 .1 915.4 .1 t0� 7 �06 � 95.6 Ba 3 I99.5
217r10 CRANr TYP 25 .3 3.330 1 .5 133 ? ��3.0 93.? Bt �t 1,354 6 �" "
z�ero� STILLWITER 111P �6 .3 2,522.1 .� 9?.0 100,� 96 6 58 11 1,231.8 �c P
21lY02 STILlW1EA tEt 2.3 16,011.6 2.3 88.5 87.1 95 8 66 93 8.�6) 0 E' S
21lY03 OAKiRK MGMIS-lAYPR1 51 .6 3.912.3 .6 )6 7 78.6 97.6 15 25 1,906 1 ♦= 7
Z1t1'04 6AYTDYN T1i 8 .1 7�9.0 .1 93 6 9).7 95.8 JC 4 363.0 �E 5
ItSr05 W lAlcElANO TYD 22 .3 2,961.0 1 i3a 6 �39.? 96.� 5a u 1,909.3 E+ 5
21tY06 LKIMD,SHOR,S.CII,S.M 67 .9 5.076.6 .8 8�-7 93.? 91.1 87 29 1,809 � �' 8
21C1'0� AFTDN 21 .3 2.Y10.7 1 t11.3 131.6 92.? 118 12 t,309.9 �5 G
21lrOB OEtM�RK TIA 5 .1 SS).9 � t�� 6 /17 e 95 � 58 2 257.0 �E �
2211'O1 iEST ST. ►AUl 6? .E 5,659.9 8 9t 3 95.3 85.D 77 38 3,691.� ES i
221r02 fE1DOT� MEI6MtS 51 .6 7,717.5 1 1 i5� 3 i5�.5 97.9 B3 27 �,059.0 5� E
221Y01 =UIFISM IARE I 496.5 .1 2!8 3 285.0 E� t 7� 1 196.5 IC_ G
Z21Y0� SOUTM ST. iAUI 55 .) 3.515.3 .5 64 5 66.8 86.6 55 39 2.503.9 I:.E
I21Y05 INYE11 CRDVE lIEIGIITS �8 .6 1,393.6 .6 9t 5 9�.6 96.8 62 35 3,128.� 7'.2
2t11�06 lEIpOTAiIILtlDAIE 1 I95.0 295.D 325.0 90.8 71 1 295.0 10' 0
2271'01 EA6AN 16 .2 1,6t0.6 .2 102.5 105.5 97.2 37 11 1,410.7 Ef C
22?r02 110tEMDUNi 1 .1 315.5 78 9 81.t 97.3 33 ? 150.0 a'.5
223r01 �URNSYILLE 3 a65.0 1 155.0 15).t 98.6 25 3 465.0 1C_ 0
� -``
� . � . - . -
���������
- ������ ' �,�
„ -, ,,,
�� ��� � � � 111 ' j 'R
�r ����� ' 1 1 1. :. 1�
� I I •. 1 1
���� . *. . ' ' ` .
- ���� �� �• '
.1 t � 11 . 1 I
. ����!lilllill� 1 1�•' , 1�1 1
� •1� . 1�1 1
� �'1�31�'�571���'.�!� �� � �.
���'��!f�7"1�lRi�iRFf� _ .
i•'�1�7 .�.� tf�3fi:l�f� •_ .� .
��� �1���.�����.�1� �r r ;� � �
t i'T1��iZ�''�r"1���n7 �r ::�
tr iTi7i�T1�'�!�}7 ..� .� i�����'�1 " ;�� _ * .
,� �;7i1G7�Ff�'�1�''�iii�*37ii�''�� t �.:� � .
� �� i�1�'�Rfx'SI��Stiif���i!�l���'� : � .
� i'�li7r'�i'F'�7�1�7��'f���T�rf -
,� i"7��fi'l��1it�Fl �r :. Si��l�'�1 � ��� .� �if»
,. �?1��f�'� .. ,� ii'�i[�'�'��Zl��
1� i�'1s�}7�f1R?�f?'1iT��7�F�7 : � �F� � :�.� . ..
T ���1�,� �� ���� 1' � •r,� i
. .,� ������1P'�}��.11�}}:7���� �
� �� !'1fF:1�F:�7��:A�I�!1111I�' � !�!/�4�f� ' .
������t': .'i���������M'� . J
' �+�:�����:�1l�JlVl�i�:�l�.}�� • 'Y �r ;�� .�
������ '•� • i i�
Y ���� � ' �. ��
�� ������ � . � � ��� .� r :
����f1l��1�1�;I . .
����iliii� • t • i i i �.
'( ��,� � �� . �
���� � •� � Y �� � �;� � : �r
������ �. •'i ��� . � �. � ���
' �1�� :�. ':� �:���•� .�,�� � � � ;i� �
������������il:Il!':l • � �'w���,..�;��������������'�
��5��'!� -._ .:� . �: ������• �� ��,1��o21C1:�1 �� �,• i
���»� � �� • il�ill:J�� . 4, :.
����7����-7�1I�1�i� � . � c ; : . ��•
����� i �;� � �
��������'���j�
.' .
�����!'ll•:�t�l��I�lf/��i�'i-'1 �♦• �.:� ' -
����1'�Rl:'l�� �� � . . . �� i .
�=�1�?��?1i�':'3RiZ1��S1��?��?�� [ ::� �,7
�� i i�. � � ic �� 'l �r �� •6 ��� �
�� �� . f . � � .' . . � : s:� • �
�:. � �� �. � �` •�� , 1. .
������ r� . �� � � � �a� �•��?�� � �:
�7����� v �.!� �?� t:� ::� �.'� �.� � ��
�t?'����!t��'�'��'7��31�� . �� �; � ,
���l.'.'1►{:■��� . .� :i ir: . t:� �1'1 . �
���-�'!1-- i� �i
���-�--���- :� � �.,.
�������('111�rf1����'.• :�� `i �
��� i4' .': �� �: �r.� �!F?�1��IIF7�:1� '
�'7�!��!��?Tl����i�F�f�'� • 4:� . t• ,. ,�
i;57�7�7i7�_'.'''�".7���?�'''� ,. .,:,. _ �� � ;�
i^1i�'�iT'�i�7�'SR�f�?�i� .., ��'; � �� -
��, �7l1rS7�1Fe'1iI'ff��'7�Z7 :� ��� �'►� ::� _ l
i�l�'��RF.�'1�'�i�?t � , .� :. ;
lti7iR���F;3�T7«?1�'.-��t r :� : :�� � i
��f�T�i�i�1��1 , , . , '�
i=itif'1iFl� :�_ ,,, �� ' . ._ .. i,
iZf1i1*1�RI7�t'1if'1ti�'��'7��F���� .�: �� ,
i:•'1�St���T�3F',-?7�'��..*�?1 _ ,� �'._�''� ,,,: �. : ..
i.'��1!_!��'�'fi�Z7�l�!�?�7�� _ :� r ;.:
i."%l�T37����L1r���?t�1i�'�!.��.'�!f��������� r :� ��.�
�����I'."�'_�I�� �� l. �l'frtl'11—�.'I�T��� � ' �
����11��1 71 z�■�� F :r �IIIE■ � 4:' �� }_�r��
�ri������T� ..v ��1 �_ � �� .• !: �'r�
i:"t�!��i7�'?�"��37����?�1�5�?'��� �
i'1�'1�'7����f7� �:� �i7����i7
�������� .�, ,,
_ ----
24 REGIONAL ML3 OF MINNESOTA
� PROFiLE SALES ACTIYITY
+ tINOLE FAMIL� ONIY PROPERTIES FOR APRIL tY6� - JUNE tY6�
In�ruu���ruwcn u�u.w or ua�cnor or na�eev�a u+o eor.•�e�uo-rcna�r�aunw ro ne onwx�c.mn
�1 ♦TOTK OOLLAII 4 IAlif IIYEMYE �YfMGE ♦ 0� Uff1MG MEWAM LLLf AYEM6E iAIF AYEM6E 11fTIK rIKE
�MA Mll1 YI1REi rOIiJM[ AC7MR' UiT1MG MUC[ iELLIMG MICF� M4Cf IIECE�YED MUCE• �IME NOUtEf iOID MOUfEi MOT sOID !
. . , S.fl04 100.44
_�. n 4.
.0� 7] .542 ---�1.75 u.i�
Z490 � �.SZ. �.440 ' S.44 l.420.
� 7� -�2,02p} ___�.62+ 70.750_ p4
Q.�4i _14�.554 t ---__94:11 fi_l4.049 . 3i3.
117 ---44.021 t_ ---9Q.17_t__-4Q,1S4 .21
4.�75 ___ 58.702 ! _f9,0�0��-_d�1�.2��Q I.SS- ---- f6.i14;
2 __l2.2�3 ---44.��0 �-_ --91,'�+--�n.c50� 8�. �1 .
31 ��1.�55 t ---____1l.ZL�-1�97_ ?_ _ t05-��'t-
� �Q� t -- ---9Z.4�-t- 7l.900
7 1 �78�._ _�4����11 .17 �12_
--_2$,174 j__. ____l4���__7�.44Q 50.48. �.�3.
�B6��_ -96•04_� 109.000 � 7�
-�4241�- -- Y�.12� 45.000 ,�g_ '
441 7�45 -------4l.5b _D4.�44_ 42 104.466,
IS�� _-�4: .444 i2.910.
7 97
7 � _ 97.65
T 1 3 _._-�45 1 2:
1.� �2Q _-.fl1��� - -31.� ) 7��
4 154 '-�4� 8.544 �LQl
�.��.� �,3.7�� -.�7:4�. 43,Q� ��,� 1 1 �
• � 62'1�� 57�?��--._�2�� _�4.� . .
•33� t�.���*_�Y4.3��.+ ____�,44�__107 ��.pQ� t10.6�4 .
44 �� t0o.�2� --���p ' � � ��-
+ ---�,QO. �54 _�4.� � ��_ �.
� �7.�44 �O.OQ4 ' _7�.14 _�9.444 _�4.QQ 1�4.971 .
t i I4�� �`Z`�2? _��� _ 75.000- --�9.�5� 9E.p44..
7 �§ 1 47,Q1Q� -- - �'w�- -�4•4�_ _ �6_439�
_ .00 � 7
�44. .00� 6l.500_
---- �l.9�4_
• ?�.9�4.�- --- ,�4���72.96��
_�.
QQ I 7
---� ------1 --1�.959 .
_ �_.444- -- �O.Q90 __�7,� ---29.Q00 ----_4�,00--
� � .a �2s,�3o �e.�a j �o�,azs io�.saz 1 �.�� �os.a,s zs.so ua.o6,
'M�DIAM{��MIL'(IIAZ Al YANY�IfT11105��OVE rt Af KLOw 17
In Re The Matter Of;
Application for Special Condition
Use Permit by Fam� lystyle of St, Paul ,
Inc . to Operate Community Residential
Facilities at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne;
and 397 Colborne.
SWORN STATEMENT OF
NELS JOHNSON
Nels Johnson , being duly sworn upon oath , states as
follows;
1 • I reside at 387 Duke Street, which is right across
the street from 386 Duke Street and the main building owned by
Familystyle . I am providing this sworn testimony to the Zoning
Committee because I cannot be present at the August 18, � ggg
public hearing and I want the Committee to hear what I have to
say,
2• I moved to my present address in 1968 before
Familystyle or any other community residential facilities were in
the neighborhood. Many of the other homes near me were in very
bad shape. They were run down and needed repair. At that time,
the neighborhood had a few kids who ran pretty wild. They broke
my windows with rocks and snowballs and it would often be noisy
and loud.
3. Because I live right across the street from one of
the houses that Familystyle is requesting a special use permit
for, I think I have a pretty good perspective about how
Familystyle effects the neighborhood, From my point of view,
things have gotten better since Familystyle entered the
-----
__ -- . . _ . --__-
��� /�
� ' neighborhood:
a. First, all the homes that Familystyle owns
have been improved and are constantly being worked on, including
the houses at 386 Duke, 383 and 397 Colborne. I really cannot
be9in to tell you how much the overall appearance of the
neighborhood has improved. You can always see carpenters and
grounds keepers working on the property. They have painted all
the houses inside and out, they have planted shrubs and trees,
they have sodded lawns, they even pick up litter in the street and
sweep the sidewalks.
b. The neighborhood is much more peaceful now than
it ever was. When I first got here , the whole street seemed to be
a lot more active, I think it was because the neighbors were much
younger. Now, I sit on my porch everyCay and I am always amazed
at how calm it is, especially when you consider how close I am to
downtown and West Seventh , �
�• I feel very safe w�here I live. I park my car
on the street and no one �ver bothers it. I have not had any
problems with vandalism since Familystyle came into the neighbor-
hood. I want the 2oning Committee to know that my street is as
safe as any urban area in St. Paul , I do not appreciate people
claiming that it is full of crime when it is not and I certainly
do not think that getting rid of the three houses Familystyle .
wants to continue operating would get rid of the little crime that
we do have.
4• I do not want to make the Committee think that
everything is always perfect . No neighborhood in St . Paul can say
that. I did have a little problem awhiie back. There was a
resident of one of the houses that spent more time hanging around
my house and fence than I wanted him to. I contacted the staff of
Familystyle and the problem was taken care of right away. I was
never bothered by that resident agai�n. How many people living
near downtown can say that about solving problems they have with
their neighbors?
5 • I strongly believe that Familystyle is a good
infiuence in the neighborhood overall and I consider them to be
very good neighbors. Maybe some people are afraid of the
residents living in the Familystyle homes and just want them out
of the area, but I try not to judge people before I get to know
them. From what I know of the people living at Familystyle, it
would be a shame to get rid of the three houses at 386 Duke, 383
and 397 Colborne. I hope the Committee lets them stay.
Nels Joh son
Subscribe and n to before me
this _��sy f ugust, 1988.
tary Public
STEVEN ANDERSON
NOTARY PUO�tC-MINNE�pTA
RAMSITY GpuNTy
MY CpMMI/f10N[fI►IR[1 AUG. {. 1991
- � --------------------------------------
In Re The Matter Of:
Application for Special Condition
Use Permit by Familystyle of St. Paul ,
Inc. to Operate Community Residential
Fecilities et 386 Duke, 383 Colborne,
and 397 Colborne.
SWORN STATEMENT OF
SHARLENE REINKE
--------------------------------------
Sharlene Reinke, being duly sworn upon oath, states as
follows:
1 . I reside with my family at 385 Duke Street which is
right by the homes owned by Familystyle. I have lived at this
address for five years and I really enjoy the location and
neighborhood. I am submitting this sworn statement in support of
Familystyle of St. Paul Inc. ' s application to continue operating
community residential facilities at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397
Colborne. I firmly believe that they should be allowed to stay in
this neighborhood.
2. I moved to Duke Street from a nearby area because I
felt very unsafe. There were fires intentionally set in my old
buflding and I wanted to protect my family. Since I moved to Duke
Street� I have experienced no problems with arson, or any other
crime, including vandalism. I feel very safe raising my daughter
here. I think many people assume that there is a lot of crime in
our neighborhood because we live so close to downtown . If it is
out there, I am never bothered by it.
3. Actually, my neighborhood is generally very quiet
and peaceful . The disturbances that occur once in awhile are
. , � G_ � � �,�
a
• � usually from the block north of Jefferson were younger people
live. The Familystyle houses usually get pretty quiet early in
the evening.
4. I am very impressed with the way Familystyle
maintains their buildings. In the five years I have been here
they are alweys painting and working on the houses. It looks much
better now than it did when I first moved here and the way they
take care of their buildings I have the feeling it will even get
better.
5. I also want the Zoning Committee to know that I
think Familystyle is a good neighbor to have. People say hello
and are friendly but they also respect my privacy. I have had
only one complaint since I moved here. I recentiy had a death in
my family and of the residen��� said something to me about it that
I thought was inappropriate. I told the staff about the comment
and they took care of the matter right away. I really appreciated
that.
6. I live right across the street from 386 Duke and I
see no reason why the special condition use permit should not be
granted. If it doesn't bother me to have them stay in the
neighborhood, I don't see why it should bother anyone else.
�
Sharlene Re ' ke
Subscribe�i and Sworn to before me
this �_ day o gust, 1988.
STEVEN ANtl`RBON
H�T�►�r�w��0•M1N�iE���A
Ot y PU � 1 C RAMK�GONNf1�
. r�C�rryNOM��tHR��A � �
� ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
FILE #10348
1. APPLICANT: Familystyle of Saint Paul, Inc. DATE OF HEARING: 8/18/88
2. CLASSIFICATION: Special Condition Use with Modification
3. LOCATION: 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397 Colborne (between Jefferson and
Palace)
4. PLANNING DISTRICT: 9
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On File.
6. PRESENT ZONING: RT-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 60.413(S) , 64.300(d)
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: - DATE: 8/12/88 BY: Lisa J. Freese
A. PURPOSE: To allow continued use of three ad�acent residences as community
residential facilities for mentally ill adults with modification of the distance
requirement.
B. PARCEL SIZE: The parcel at 397 Colborne has 40 feet of frontage and a depth of
125 feet for a total lot area of 5,000 square feet. The parcel at 383 Colborne
has 66 feet of frontage on Colborne and a depth of 125 feet for a total lot area
of 8,332 square feet. The parcel at 386 Duke has 40 feet of frontage on Duke
and a depth of 125 feet for a total lot area of 5,000 square feet.
C. EXISTING LAND USE:
386 Duke, a community residential facility for four residents;
383 Colborne, a community residential facility for 13 residents;
397 Colborne, a community residential facility for 6 residents.
D. SURROUNDING LAND USE:
North, East, South and West: Low to medium density residential
E. FINDINGS:
1. Familystyle of St. Paul operates several community facilities for the mentally
ill in this neighborhood under the Minnesota Department of Human Services, Rule
36 provisions. The three facilities in question, 383 and 397 Colborne and 386
Duke Street, serve a total of 23 residents. Familystyle operates 24 separate
facilities, basically converted houses, serving a total of 175 residents in
roughly a two block area bounded by Jefferson to the north, Colborne to the
east, Palace to the south and Erie to the west.
2. Twenty-one of these facilities were established prior to the adoption of the
community residential facilities zoning ordinance in 1974 and are considered
legal nonconforming with respect to the special conditions imposed on such
facilities.
3. In 1983, the applicant requested a special condition use permit to establish the
three facilities in question. The Planning Commission unanimously denied the
permit because the facilities could not meet the 1,320 feet spacing requirement.
The applicant appealed to the City Council and the council reversed the Planning
Commission decision, granting the permit subject to five conditions (see
attached resolution) .
Condition three of the resolution required that Familystyle agree to two
stipulations and abide by whichever one occurred first. They were: (1) upon
implementation of the dispersal law (chapter 167 Laws of 1984) , the city may
revoke the permits for the subject properties: or (2) if the dispersal law has
not been implemented by October 1, 1988, the special condition use permit for
the sub�ect parcels be revoked. Familystyle concurred with the conditions.
File #10348
Page Tfao
4. The Ramsey County Plan for the dispersal of residential treatment programs
(1986) includes the following work plan item:
The department will develop with Family Sty1e Homes, Inc. by December 1, 1985, a
specific plan for the phase-out/ dispersal no Iater than October 1, 1985,
programs Iocated at 383 Colborne, 397 Colborne, and 36S Duke in accordance with
the St. Pau1 City Council resolution 84-1121.
No progress has been made for implementing this item so the condition (2) of the
Council resolution is in effect and the applicant must disband the three
facilities in question by October 1, 1988. The applicant seeks to continue the
operation of these three facilities by receiving a modification for the distance
condition of the special condition use permit.
5. The facilities at 383 Colborne and 386 Duke are licensed for six or fewer
residents. Such facilities are permitted in the RT-1 zoning district subject to
the condition that there is a minimum distance of 1,320 feet between facilities
(Section 60.413(5)) . The facility at 397 Colborne for 13 facility residents is
subject to six conditions including the distance requirement of 1,320 feet
(Section 60.423 (5)) . The applicant is able to meet the other five conditions.
6. The Planning Commission may modify any or all special conditions when strict
application of such special conditions would unreasonably limit or prevent
otherwise lawful use of a piece of property or an existing structure and would
result in exceptional undue hardship to the owner of the property or structure,
provided that it will not impair the intent and purpose of such special
conditions and is consistent with health, morals, and general welfare and is
consistent with the reasonable enjoyment of the adjacent property.
7. The structures were originally constructed as one and two family residences and
the applicant has not demonstrated that it is unreasonable to convert them back
to a conforming use.
8. The intent of the distance requirement between community residential facilities
to avoid concentration of these types facilities in a neighborhood. The State of
Minnesota has determined that a planning district is overconcentrated if one-
half of one percent of the district's population resides in a treatment
facility. Planning District 9 has over 3 percent of the total population of the
district living in a licensed community residential facility. Neighborhood
concentration is a detriment to facility residents as well, who retain an
institutional rather community-based environment. Therefore to modify the
condition does meet the intent of the ordinance.
9. The intent of the City Council decision was to give the applicant sufficient
time (5 years) to make necessary arrangements to avoid both displacement of
their clients financial hardship.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff findings 1 through 9, staff recommends
denial of the special condition use permit with modification for of the distance
condition to allow the continued use of the community residential facilities at
383 Colborne, 397 Colborne, and 368 Duke.
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL CONDITION USE
. � CITY OF SAINT PAUL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY
File 4� /4 3y$
Application Fee $ ;�� �-
Tentative Hearing Date �—�g"gQj
Number of Lots or Size of Parcel:
Application is hereby made for a Special Condition Use Permit under the provisions of
Chapter 6 0 , Section 4 2 3 , Paragraph 1 and 3 , of the Zoning Code to operate a
community residential facilities as defined by 60.203C of the Zoninq Code.
A. APPLICANT
Name Familystvle of St. Paul, Inc. Phone (Daytime) 222-6600
Address 398 Duke� St. Paul . MN ZiP 55102
Property interest of Applicant (Owner, contract purchaser, etc.) Leasee
Name of owner (if different) Family Stvle investment Co.
B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Address/Location 3 8 6 Duke, 3 8 3 Co lborne, and 3 9 7 Colborne
Legal Description: Lot Block Add.
Present Zoning RT-1 Lot Size See Memorandum attached
C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Explain how you will meet each of the Special Conditions. Attach supporting materials
(diagrams, site plan, letters of support, etc.)
See Memorandum attached
If you have any questions, please contact:
Saint Paul Zoning Office R EC E I VE D
1100 City Hal! Annex
25 West Fourth Street ,J�� 191988
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 4102
(298-4154) ZONING 1�1�g2
. MEMORANDUM
ACCOMPANYING APPLICATI�i FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBMITTED BY: Familystyle Homes of St. Paul , Inc.
TO: St. Paul Planning and Economic Development
Commission
RE: Explanation and supporting documentation for
Familystyle's application under 60.423(3) ;
Outline of hardship pursuant to 64.300(4) .
DATE: July 15 , 1988
PREPARED BY: Steven Anderson, JANECEK & WRIGHT, 2451 15th
St. N.W. , New Brighton, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------
This memorandum is submitted by Familystyle of St.
Paul (hereinafter Familystyle) in support of an application
for a special use permit to continue operating "Community
Residential Facilities" within the meaning of Chapter 60.203C
of the Zoning Code at 397 and 383 Colborne and a "Supportive
Independent Living" (SIL) facility at 386 Duke.
A. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES INVOLVED.
The special use permit application regards the
following properties:
1 . 383 Colborne. (See Exhibit 1A)
a. Legal Description:
Lot 19, Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey's
Subdivision of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of
Stinson, Brown & Ramsey's Addition to St.
Paul . Together with: The South 26-8/12
feet of Lot 20, Block 3, of Stinson and
Ramsey's Subdivision of the West half of
Block Sixteen ( 16) of Stinson, Brown and
Ramsey' s Addition to St. Paul .
, - b. Number of Occupants: 13 ( living in three
apartments)
c. Lot Dimensions: 125 feet by 66 feet, 8
inches producing 8,332.5 square feet.
d. Current Zoning Designation: RT-1 (See
Exhibit 3) .
e. Current License Status: Licensed by the
Minnesota Department of Human Services as a
"Rule 36" facility. �icensed by St. Paul as
a "Supervised Rooming and Boarding House"
( Lic. No. 95134)
2 . 397 Colborne. (See Exhibit 1B)
a. Legal Description:
Lot 16, Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey's
Subdivision of the West 1/2 of Block 16 of
Stinson, Brown & Ramsey's Addition to
St. Paul .
b. Number of Occupants: 6 ( living in two
apartments)
c. Lot Dimensions: 125 feet by 40 feet.
d. Current Zoning Designation: RT-1 (See
Exhibit 3) .
e. Current License Status: Licensed by the
Minnesota Department of Human Services as a
"Rule 36" facility.
3 . 386 Duke. (See Exhibit 1C)
a. Legal Description:
Lot 7 , Block 3, Stinson & Ramsey's
Subdivision of the West 1/2 of B7ock 16 of
Stinson, Brown & Ramsey's Addition to
, St. Paul .
2.
b. Number of Occupants: 4
c. Lot Dimensions: 125 feet by 40 feet.
d. Current Zoning Designation: RT-1 (See
Exhibit 3) .
e. Current License Status: Approved
designation by the Minnesota Department of
Human Services as a SIL facility. Waiting for
final license to be issued.
B. BACKGROUND.
Familystyle is a mental health care provider duly
licensed by the Minnesota Department of Mental Health to
provide 175 beds for mentally ill persons. Familystyle is
currently operating at or near capacity. The properties at
issue represent 23 of Familystyle's 175 beds, or 13� of
Familystyle's total capacity. The remaini�g beds are in
properties that are completely grandfathered into the
existing zoning scheme and are not now at issue except by
virtue of their location to the three properties. (See
Exhibit 4) .
A City Counsel Resolution dated August 21 , 1984
granted Familystyle a special use permit to operate Rule 36 ,
Category II facilities at the above-referenced locations and
further provided that, "If the dispersal law has not been
implemented by October 1 , 1988, the three permits hereby
granted shall be terminated as of that date. " (See Exhibit 2,
City Council Resolution, Council File No. 84-1121 ) .
Since that time, the �"dispersal law" referenced in
3.
a � CJ �. �lJ� lC� �
. � the Resolution has not been deemed implemented in Ramsey
County and, therefore, if the language of the 1984 Resolution
is to be strictly followed, the special use permits will
expire on October 1 , 1988 effectively displacing 23 mentally
ill residents at a time when the need for such facilities is
at high demand. Consequently, Familystyle is compelled to
seek renewal of the special use permit for all three
properties.
C. APPLICATION OF RELEVANT CODE PROYISIONS.
As the remaining portion of this Memorandum
indicates, the Code provisions of primary importance are the
distance requirements contained in Chapter 60.423 ( 1 ) and
(3) and the "hardship" provision contained in Chapter 64. 300,
Subdivision 4. However, some clarification and application
of relevant Code provisions is necessary to establish the
specific Code provisions that apply to each property, what
requirements are met by Familystyle, and why the Planning
Commission should utilize authority granted under Chapter 64
to grant the renewal of the special use permits.
Since the time that the original Resolution was
passed, the Minnesota Department of Human Services reissued
Familystyle's license to operate Rule 36 facilities at both
Colborne locations. The property located at 397 Colborne
currently houses six residents and, therefore, it is
considered a "permitted single-family residential use" for
Zoning purposes within the meaning of Minn. Stat. Sec.
245A. 11 , Subd.2. (See Exhibit 5A, Applicable Statutes and
Code Provisions) . As a result, requirements contained
4.
Chapter 60.423( 1 ) are applicable to 397 Colborne.
The property located at 383 Colborne houses 13
residents and, therefore, is considered a "permitted
multifamily residential use" within the meaning of Minn.
Stat. Sec. 245A. 11 , Subd.3. (See Exhibit 5A) . As a result,
requirements contained in Chapter 60.423(3) are applicable to
383 Colborne which are more extensive than requirements found
in Paragraph ( 1 ) .
A slightly different analysis is necessary to
determine which paragraph, if any, of Chapter 60.423 applies
to 386 Duke. Since the original Resolution was passed, the
Minnesota Human Services Department created a new category of
mental health facilities, specifically, SILS. However, the
Department has not yet created a formal iicense category for
SIL facilities nor is it certain that Minnesota Statute 245A
will encompass SIL facilities by definition when the license
is actually created. Consequently, the 386 Duke property can
technically be classified as an "unlicensed community
residential facility" with 6 or fewer residents as defined by
Chapter 60. 203C of the Code thereby subject to the same
requirements as 397 Colborne that are contained in 60.423( 1 ) .
1 . 386 Duke and 397 Colborne: A�olication Of
60.423( 1 ) .
Chapter 60.423( 1 ) incorporates into RT-1 districts
all permitted uses and regulations found in R-1 through R-4
including Chapter 60.413(5) which states:
Community residential facilities serving six or
fewer faciiity residents, excluding foster homes,
subject to the condition that a minimum distance of
5.
. , 1 . 320 feet will be required between zoning lots
used for community residential facilities, again
excluding foster homes. This minimum distance
requirement may be modified. (emphasis added) .
Both 386 Duke and 397 Colborne house "six or fewer"
residents and both comply with all relevant single family lot
requirements for RT-1 districts. Neither property, however,
complies with the 1340 foot distance requirement. As the
Code states, the distance requirement "may be modified" but
the Code then fails to offer criteria for determining when
such modification is proper. Familystyle argues that
modification under this provision is nonetheless proper and
is governed by the "hardship" provisions contained in 64.300,
Subdivision 4. The reasons Familystyle is requesting
modification of the distance requirement for 386 Duke and 397
Colborne are identical to Familystyle's reasons for asking
that the distance requirement pertaining to 383 Colborne be
waived and set forth in paragraph D below.
2 . 383 Colbo�ne: Aoalication Of 60.423(3) .
Chapter 60.423(3) states:
The following additional uses shall be permitted,
subject to the conditions hereinafter imposed for each
use and subject to review and approval of the planning
commission:
(3) A community residential facility serving seven
or more facility residents subject to the following
conditions:
(a) It shall not be located in two-family
dwelling unless the community residential facility
occupies t�e entire structure.
(b) It does not serve more than 16 facility
residents except that structures designed or newly
built specifically for greater capacity may aliow a
greater number provided that all other conditions of
speciai condition use are met.
(c) The minimum lot size for community
6.
� • residential facilities is that prescribed for a one-
family dwelling plus 300 square feet for each facility
resident over and above six residents. In addition,
community residential facilities serving more than 16
residents shall meet the requirements for height, yard
setback, and maximum percent of lot occupied by main
building set forth in Chapter 61 .
(d) A minimum distance of 1 , 320 feet will be
required between zoning lots used for con�nunity
residential facilities, excluding foster homes.
(e) There shall be one off-street parking space for
every two facility residents.
(f) Permission for special condition use applies to
the community residential facility only as long as
licensing, purpose, size, or location do not change.
The property at 383 Colborne meets all necessary
criteria for being granted a special use permit with the
exception of the distance requirement contained in "d. "
Specifically:
a. Multi-unit structures. Familystyle
occupies the entire building located at 383
Colborne.
b. Desian reauirements_if servinq_more than
16 residents. Only 13 residents occupy 383
Colborne therefore this provision is not
applicable.
c. Minimum lot size. The total square
footage of 383 Colborne must exceed 5, 100 square
feet pursuant to the formula established in section
"c. " Specifically:
3,000 sq. ft. minimum single family lot
size for RT-1 districts
(See chart in Exhibit 5B, showing
Section 61 . 101 of the Code)
+ 2 , 100 ( 13 - 6 = 7 x 300 sq. f t. )
5 , 100 Total needed
7.
��— �� ��
� The total square footage for 383 Colborne is
8,332.5.
d. 1 .340_foot distance reauirement. 383 Colborne
fails to meet this criteria. (See Exhibit 4)
e. Parking. 383 Colborne has 4 unpaved parking
spaces on its lot and has unlimited access to 25
paved parking spaces within a few feet located at
397 Colborne.
f. Termination of license based on chdr�e.
Although this is not applicable at the present
time, it should be noted that the nature of the license and
the facilities' purpose has not changed since issuance of the
original special use purpose. Consequently, the 134� foot
minimum distance requirement contained in paragraphs 1 and 3
of Chapter 60.423 represent the sole grounds found in the
Zoning Code for denying Familystyle's application renew the
special use permit.
D. AUTHORITY TO GRANT THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS FOUND
IN CHAPTER 64.300. SUBD. 4: "HAROSHIP" TO APPLICANT.
The Planning Cotr�nission has authority to grant
Familystyle's request for a special use permit even though
the 1340 foot distance requirement is not met pursuant to
64.300 , Subdivision 4 which states in relevant part:
The planning conunission, after public hearing, may
modify any or all special use conditions, when strict
application of such special conditions would . . . result
in exceptional undue hardshio to the owner of such
property. . .provided that such modification will not
impair the intent and purpose of such special condition
and is consistent with health. . .and Qeneral welfare of
the communitv and is consistent__with reasonable en.iovment
of the ad.iacent proaertv. (emphasis added) .
8.
� ' Additional evidence pertaining to hardship will be submitted
by and on behalf of Familystyle during the public hearing
stage of this application, howeve�, the following provides a
brief outline of the arguments to be presented.
1 . Failina _to_ qrant_the_s�ecial use �ermit would
cause undo financial_ hardshi�. i
As discussed above, the three properties at issue
provide 23 beds and constitute approximately 13� of the beds
currently operated by Familystyle and generate roughly the
same percentage of Familystyle's monthly gross revenues.
These gross revenues are needed by Familystyle to maintain
the current high level of care and service.
2 . Failina to arant_the__s�ecial_use_nermit._would
have siqnificant neaative imoact on existin9
programs.
The 23 beds at issue provide Familystyle with
approximately �2 ,400.00 of monthly program money f rom the
Minnesota Department of Human Services. This program money
is used throughout the Familystyle facilities and represents
a valuable resource to Familystyle as well as its residents.
3. Failina to_arant_the_snecial_use �ermit would
have a neaative inmact on the "health. . .9eneral
wel fare of the commun i tv.
As the Code states, the decision to grant a special
use permit under the authority of 64.300, Subdivision 4
requires consideration of the health and welfare of the
community. As a provider of care for mentally ill
individuals, Familystyle's corporate and professional purpose
is to provide for the health and general welfare of the City
of St. Paul as well as Ramsey County.
9.
. • The facilities involved provide care unique from
other Rule 36 providers located within the City and the
County by providing supervised, supportive living
environments young, dual disability residents and married
individuals. The married couples can remain living together
while receiving care. Both groups of residents simply can
not be absorbed into any other community residential facility
now in existence and will loose the opportunity for such
care.
4. Grantinq the s�ecial use oermit will not im�air
the use of adiacent nro�ertY.
The map attached as Exhibit _ provides a picture of
the properties adjacent to 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397
Colborne as well as all property in the immediate area. As
the map shows, the properties involved are of three types:
a. other facilities operated by Familystyle;
b. single-family homes; and,
c. non-residential use property.
The three properties at issue have been operated by
Familystyle as community residential facilities since 1984
with no adverse effects on any of the three types of property
above. Many of the properties in the immediate area are very
supportive of Familystyle's presence and have testified on
behalf of Familystyle at various public hearings in the past.
E. CONCLUSION.
Familystyle's application for renewal of a
special use permit created by the St. Paul City Council in
1984 (Council File No. 84-1121 ) should be granted despite the
10.
��'�= /r ��
� �1340 foot distance requirement and the community residential
facilities located at 386 Duke, 383 Colborne and 397 Colborne
should be allowed to continue operating and serving the
mental health needs of the community.
Failing to grant the special use permit would
result in severe hardship to Familystyle, the resident's of
the facilities, and badly needed mental health programs for
the community. The facilities have been operating for four
years with no adverse effect on the adjacent properties.
Familystyle reserves the right to submit additional
evidence and/or testimony on its behalf throughout the public
hearing stage.
Respectfully Submitted,
JANECE & W G
Dated: July 15 , 1988 St ven Anderson
Attorneys for Familystyle
11.
��' Exhibit lA • �� �'.� � ��
.
� !'iINTR N�� ..w,���..,r._�.. ,.�in,.�.,�•r..�t.n..�w,•�.P.. Mlns��sll� � � �
I...nuAuel G�IN� -- -- -- •
N��delir �,
Cer
� � .
383 Colborne
f3y _� ,
„�•�,�,�.
. (rescrvcA Ior recorA�ng Aa1a1
�1nit'i'rA(�1�. Iti:c�lti'I'ltl"I'/1� 1)UF; I1F:t�EON:
�
�� �
IreservlA IOt fnorlg�qe�eqistry lit p�ymr.nt d.tl�l �, �.
Il:�tc: Nov�ml�cr �
, 19fl�l. : ;�;•
, .
... ;:�,
TH1S CONTRACT FOR DI�,F;I) is m<��ic �n thc nhnve dntc hv P�{ILIP R. EiILL�UIN and _ � } :'`�y�
. /...� _i�
N��.*7CY E. 1{ILIMIIN . . �'�
- , hushancl and wife ;� , �;�.;
(m:iritr+l stelue),' ' �'�
:.,,;�
�� licr (whcther �nc or m��rc), nn�1 F11TiILY STYLE INVES'ITIENT C0. , a �linncsote PBrtnerRhip�
h_ ,I/'�*fES JAP�ECEK. Partner thercof, , ('urch:�c�r (��•h��ih��r ��nc or more). � " '
`�ilcr nnd f'urchnscr aRrcc t�� th�r fnll<���•in�; lcrmc: .
1 f'll�)1'�:RTY I)h:SCRIt'TlON. .Scller herclivi celis, nnd PurchnGCr h�rrh�� 1►uv., ri�:�l ��rn��crly in �
------R�ey Count��, htinnesotn, dcecrih�d :�s f��ll����•ti: . �
Lot 19 � Bloek 3 , Stinson & Ramscy's Subclivisi.on of
the West 2 of Block 16 of Sr.inson, Dro��n & R��msey's 1ldclition
to St. Paul. Together coath: �.; .
Tlie South 2G-S/12 feet of Loi 2U, Block 3, ofStinsun �iiicl R,imsey'e ::::;;;:
Subdivision of the West ha1:C of IIlock Sixteen (1G) of Stinson, IIrown ::''�-;
and Remsey•s Addition to Sk. Paul. ' ' ��� ��"��•i .
.,� 1
.,.�.:
,:,�r, '
'}, .
. . . . �. �
. .';..' ,
•, .,
, �
I
Sub�ect� to eesemente, restrictions, exce�tions and reservati�ns of record, �
if eny. . .
�R��her with �il hereditamenla nnd appurtennncc� ticinn�in� Ihcrcto (lhe Prci�x�rt�•1. ��,
....;..
2. TITLF:, Sciler w�arrnnta thnl litie tn thc f�npert�� is, cin tl�� d�t� �f thiR c�nfr�ct, �uhjc�ct �nly to the ��'��
foll�winK exceptiene: . •;:;
(,►) ('ovennnls, condili�na, rcFlrictions, dcclnr:�ti�ns nrtd �n�cmc�rils �f rec��rc�, if nn�;
(hl Rc�CrvAllA�it o�M111C�0�� �r mincrn) ri�hlg hy thc St�tc of �tin►icentn, if nnr:
(c1 DuildinK, zonink snd tubdiviri��� 1nN•�e nnd re�ulnti�n�; �';• �
___ 1�11 The lien of real eRtttte tnxca nnd instnllmcnta of gpcci�l n�����mentF �.•hich ��re pnyoble b'y �
Purchase� put�tuAnt to pnr.��rnph R ��f thia c�ntrncl; nnd �"
�i�� T�1P �f1��nW;ww �:.�.... �� �.��...rl__.,_.__�. . , j�
^' . .
Exhibit 1B
, Mmn��..1w I�III���IT I��MVr��pryll Illnn�.il'�'��\Al.�r
� r _ t Ih�.�i.l'n Minnwool!
� • •
� 397 Colborne
f .
t
� .
� .
I .
� I�cs���vrd Ini recordinp dalil
�
nir�ii•i•c,n�.i•: iii:c.i�•ritv •rnx nuH: i�N:t�F:orv:
I g
i I�eserve0 tor mortqage�egistry la« plymenl Aalal �/
I)��c: November � 19A4.. �
Tt1IS CONTRACT FOR I)h:N;l) is mndc on lhc nhc>vc d:itc hy �'I{ILIP R. }tILLl�iI�T and
ti�1NCY E. HILUfAN
t�usband and wife
- � (m:�rilnl alatus)
���llcr (whether one or murc), s�nd F11A1ILY STYLE INVi;STTiENT CU
'nnesota Pe fnar�jp�
�'Y�N`_�_JANECEK. F�rtner therrof.
, ('urch�ticr (���hcth��r �ne or more).
�ellcr end Purchngcr a�;rcc l�► thc f�►Il�n��in�; l��rms:
1 1'ftOI'F:R"('Y I)F:�C'Itlt''flON. Srllcr h�rnt�y ���II�, t�n�i ('urch;����r h��r�l�v hu���, rt.�l pr�►perty in
_ __ Rams�y Cuunlv. Minncs��l:�, de�crihed .iF fnll�►a��:
Lot 1G � Block 3 , Stinson & Ramsey's Subclivision of
ti�e Wesfi 2 of Bloc1< 16 oP Stinson, Brown & Ra►nscy's It�lctition
to St. Paul.
:���t�ject to easements, restrictions, exceptions ancl r•escrv,�l�.in>>., �,f record,
if any.
t���cther wilh n11 heredilRments nnd appurten.�nce� helonKin� Lhrrc��o (th� !'r���H•r��•►.
�� � � ���•M%• �l1e� warrants tht►t title to the 1'rc�perly is, on !he d:�te ��f thi� c�nlr,�c•1. �ui�j��cl �nly to the
f�ilnwinR exceptiona;
��+1 ('o�enants, conditi�na� �estrictions, decls�r,�ti�ns nnd ensement� of tcc�rrd, if;�n�•;
ih► ReRCrvati�n� ��f minerala o� minrrnl ri�hts by the Stnte of Minnes�►1,�, if�n�•;
ic�) i�uildin�, zoninK and eubdiviaiun lnws nnd re�;ul�tions;
(d1 1'he licn ot renl cstate lnxeq nnd ingtnllmentc �1' RI►nt�inl ��..,,...,..,,.... .. � � � '
n � . . . .._ . . . . .
`�. , , � �
Exhibit 1C
'���� Minne..an 1'�J..�m 1� �11���1-�I�� �\fill..I�n •(�� ,Min���p�l{�
--- — _-_ -=:r-_:_ __-_. .—_-_ '_
` '1'1�;
— • 386 Duke
�ir
, � .. —
I ��i,�i u 1��
�
(
� ' I�r.sr�v��d lui i�tr.nrtimq d.�l,i)
ntc�it•rc,nc;�•: isi�:c,iti•rtt�• •rnx t�t�t: i�t�:itN:otv:
�__
�����c�ved lor moitgapc rrgistry la: pay,nr.n1 Aali►
I).�tc: Nuvcml�c��---�_ � 19fl�
'1'I115 CON'1'RAC'1' FOtZ U1•:N:1) i� m�idc �►n thc ahn�•e d;�tc t►v I'I(ILIP R, IiILLMIW and
?�"�*7CY E. 1[ILUV►N . I�usi�ancl��ncl wi.f_e �
�ii��irilri) stntus)
:���Il��r (H•h�lher nn�r or m�►rc1, :�nd F��irLY STYLE JNVCS1TiL'NT CU.�a�tattnesv_ta Partn_�rship,
hy _,1N1ES JANECEK. Fartner thereof, , I'urrh:���r h�•hc��h��r �mc or more).
tieller nnd Purch.���r a�;rcc lo ihe f��lluw�in�; t�rmv:
I 1'Itl)I'F:NTY 1)F:SCRI!''ftON. S�•lie�r h��re�l�� ���Ils, ,�nd 1'uri�h:is��r h�•rchy hu��., rrsil �►rnperty in
Ramspy C��unt��, Minnes��lh, dt•scrih�d �� (��UnH•ti:
Lot 7 , Dlock 3 , Stinson & IZ:�n�;;cy's S��inl:ivisi.�n oT
the 1�est 2 of Dlock 1G oi' Stinson, Bro�vn & )ta►nscy's 1lciclitiun
to St. Paul. '
SuUject to easements, restrictions, exceptions ancl rescrv;�t-ic,n, ut record,
if any.
t���;cthcr wilh nll heredilAments nnd �ppurtensincrc bel�n�;in�; therclo tthe I'r���u�r�}�1.
:?. 'fl7'I.F.. Sell�r N�nrrnnts thnl litle lo the 1'rnperty i�c, on the d;►tc �►f tliis c�►�Nr:u•t, �ul�je�c� only to the
(��U��v►•in� cxceptions:
i;i► ('�►venenla, conditicm�� tr�tricti�n�. c��clnr��fi�ms rnd ens���n��nl� ��f r��c�,rcl, if :ir��•:
�h► Rcacr��t►tinna nf mittetals �� min�rsil ri�htv by thc St:itc ��f h1in�i�����tr�, if:�i��•:
rr► I�uildinK. zoninK and subdivi�ai�m It���� ond re�ulntions; �
t�11 The licn of �cnl eslute tnxca nnd inRtallments of s�prci�l n��c���ment� ��•I�ic•li t�rc pnynble bjr
1'urch��rr puntunnt In nwrn�.rnnh A..[i1.�. .....,�.....�. ....a
' ��-�� ��
, ` Exhibit 2 .
_..:f _ � � c�t... . " ... .._.__�. � Council r�_ ��.i� �
" . _ _ �.` �_� {; I1'Z" t)r' �.� I \T 1 .� l.: L ��i� N0. �
"�r- l�`.C�'Y-� �`✓::Gsr - COy�rtci� �esolution � .
f , .
� . , - -
•csrntr�f �3v --- _._` "'i.��ilNi•_---- -- ._---- ------.------
_ Committer. Un►r '
Relrrrrd �'u ---- -- -------- - --- - �
Date - -- '
Uut of Cumrni�:rr E3v - -- -- _-_-_ _--=__-----------�_--
y��p,AS, ?�ili? �. �il:.�a aiade agplication to tiie Planninq
Camsaission :er 3oecial Condition L'se per�its :o= co��nity rsr�iden-
tial faci�ities and ior a modi=lcation o� t'se 1,3�0 :eet mini��m �
d3stance =equi=ed 'ae�.►een aonia9 Zots used �ar coa�a 9�tColbornenandl
�3C122L12S zor propezties lxat°d at 393 Colborna,
386 D*a�ce Sueet in t5e City o? Saint Pau2, :sissssesota; and
�1Rg,�E.1S, follo++ing �l�c bearinq vith notice to aftec+.ed
propgny owaers the Plinning Commissian oa Mareh 9. 1984 denied
�5e re4v�st !or moditication o! ths.minims� 9P$cin4 requ�=ea►ent for
'• �oamnnaity residential facilities aad therefore deaied the Spacial
Condli.i.on Ose permits for the above desc�� pm��' �d
oealed tDe deciaioo af the \_�'
�AS. Philip B� Sillman has ap_ rouncil fo2lo�+-.
�Plannia4 Co�ission �to the CitY�Com::�l and t3e City .
inq heazin9a held tor that pII'tPose on Aaril 12. 1984 and Ju1Y Z4. ; , ,
I38�1 did Sind aad determine that it M� �'�nta�orcco�unitY resi- ,
n�o�d3fy the minimam distazce soacin4 r�i �iea subject to
dential !acilities for th� above described ProPe
Fci�o++ing s�ecified conditions r+hich weze agreeaDle to tbe applicant; .
aaw, :herefore .
� COCZNCZL QP ?HE CI?Y OP Sr1�7T PAiTL DOES AEREBY RESOLVE,
t.'�nt the decision oY the Plaanin4 C�issi°n ia zaversed. aad thg
Council hereby 9rants t�e xwdi:icatioa of the minia�xm spacing requize-
arent of I,320 feet for co�nu�itp reaidential lacilitiea as specified
in Section 60.423 C3) o� �e Saint Paul Legislative Code for tDe _
caanonity resident3al lacilitfes locatad at 383 Colborae, 39�
Colborne and 3A6 Dnke Street, the modifi=e9id�t3aili cil�ities
spacinq r�qnireinc�nts for anch ca� tl'
be and a►re herebl+ made exP=�ssly gubject to the follooring terms
and conditions: •
--� _ -1�0U•�C�!1..'.1FV =- _--_- -------- - i� Reyo���ed by D!partmrnt oL
\'c:�s V.�y+ ----'— I ---- �
Ft��cn« --- - -----
p.,�,. In f�:+cot
:a�ssn: '
w�osM �, E3y -- ----- --- —
_ _.._ -
SchetDr� .----- ��j�:nu:� �I
T P/7lY.O '
�i ,
W�13M �' 1. r��:..i� •,. �:ly' nt�^�..!'1.
f t)!:'. {�� .
��
. � ���i.�� , .` _ . . ., -.-.-. _. ii {1'i - __'"__..'.__'_'_" __ _'_"_'___'._ _.__
�'i..iil�r•d !'.� �. _ '.�� l'��un�'�� 1•�rn•t�r)� ,
ii•,- _.___ _ --- - -- -----� - - -� � .
� Atu!rr.v..,t ti�� �I:r: �r IOr Subr.�„�c;n� Ir.C� unC�l
+ �... ;t�..,•r ��.i�.r _.__. . . _ �
�',�ptucc'�. . . .. . -----'
kt� - - -- - — �I H: _ _ _. - -- - _---
� , i
� �
.. . . •,', . � ,
... _ ...__�.�..
- �; ca����i (�;.J. !/.�,�
- _ , .. � � G t=rY c� r� �.� i �'1' i'.� L F�i� N0.
_ - :'�=
� : � � . �'allylc-il �esoll�iion
{'n•srntrJ k3y ---- - ._ - --- - - - ---- -----
Refrcrrd i;� __ --- - _ _ _---- Com�:�::r. Dat+
pul of C�mmitler E3v-------- •- . " __ _-- :_ =-�U_�tr —___-_-_ _
(1� Ttstt tAe Special Cooditior� ::se �r�ni ts he�oy �rsnt2cl by G`:e Gour�c:l at' the
�1ty of Sa1at ?aul shall wntinue in .�or=� �� =Tf�ct ��nl� ::o long as the c.cncunity
;-�,.sidential tacilitles are o�ratad �Y �3mily �t�le �lca�es, ?r.c. and Lhat 1f it�e �roperL•f
or o�eratton oi tl�e caa�unit,y fscilities is ao 7onger ooerat2J by �amity S�le nomes, .
Inc., then tt�esa per�+lts shall exDire :vi::�out ar�y iur��.er actian required Dy t�e Ci�j►.
; (2� Fa�ly Style af St. Faul, Inc. shall agr�e to woric Mih 3overnme^tal a�fiicials
, and Lhe ca��i�j► ia timely 1mQl�tatian of the disbursal law (CAapter lb7 lar+s of
= 1984) ri�ea U�e Ra�ase'al Cauat,�r �l ar� i s i n pl ace.
' (3) FsailX S�jrle of S� Pavl, Inc. ag►�ees to yhichever of Lhe folla+ir+g t�
' � stipujations oocnrs tlrst in time: .. _. .
. :;
(a) Upon �mple�tatioa aP U�e disbursal lax referenced above tbe
C1t�r a�► revoke tt�e ttiree Peneits under wasideratian and qranted herPby.
(b) If LMs dlsbursal la�S� �i����t'�at�r 1, 1988.
tt�e Lhree permits hertby 9ran
(4) Fmily Style of SL Paul, Ir.c. agrees to include ta+o representaiives fe-ay
the 9w�ediate neighborhood of Lhe facili�y oa its Rule 35, Cat�COr7� II. Adr9sary Gor�nit`•e�.
{5) Fmity StYle o4 SL Paul, Iac. and tt�e t�est SevenU� Street Federatt�►�aqree that -
tt�e agr�L eftecLed tn February. 984 �trictin�R e�ect and is bindinq.Family
Styl e ta 175 �wd Lhe ms�er of pra9e .
Se It - . . _. _ .
FURTpER R�SpLym, that tbe Ctty C1eri� shall o�a11 a cePY m i��s resalutio» ta
Pt►11ip R. Nillpan. tlie ZoAin9 Ad�inistrator. the Plartnln9 Com�ission and L'se Board of -
Zon;ng ApQeals. .. .. .
___ - 2 _
COL'NCIL5IEN I ReGuested 'oy Department ot:
� Yras ��_��w�. ��Y� �
o•••• �^►�hl•,J � In Facor I —--- —
Mssana �
Nicwb �• _-
SeAsWsl V/ __ e��;'lttt:! � � ---- ---�---- � ----�------------ -
' Tsd�aco �I
� . W.1�«► (i
�li�' � . : ' ' Foc^i Ap;rovrd ry c,ty Ar,o�^�v
1J,��-:ci 't" (,�enc�i l).��e• - --- - .-
�4� .- �- ----�--- ------'---
Crr�i(��A F'.�i>cd `�y �un�i y�rrt�rv i -
V f� �,' I�
R•; __,,��v ����f----��.._' ----- __ �;
R ' "'; `'�� 1� Approvr•'. `�v �•!.iYot for 5;:;�r+iss�on !o Counc�l
App�uvrd tr� �I.n-or. I'. �1�• -----'---._...__. _..__'_- -�_' ii
�' 'iv ---- �------ --- ---- -�---
�,
S _ -- -------
-'----.._. _.- ��
5 --- - -
�i
0
0
N �..
a O O
� �
� � o �
R � �� o
a . . y .
� E � o a� y >, E� o
�. G ro �o a_ �, = �o ' = rV
_ '- `� " c � •-a� � c> > � = c �i �
•!p 0 C �Ne7O 3 0 M�-F- � c9I�� j V! r- fV NM�1 �A U �NC'o Q �� ov
h N O a�Qa�a� ►—►— ac¢ �� ac¢ac m Oa�mmammm : --- v� dd 5c
> N ` � i i '� j
\ J�b J\: �• � .... 1 �i5 i 7tlM'1J � C � ' �
�l;;� z �..IN .� �
� �� .
o . � ._
� � � --
� � ' \�, � �
:� ,
` � - � _. -: _ .
.
. . - : �
°• � � .
� �--. _ ��• ----- --�— Cl
; , ._ .. .
..
.�, •,�., , N, .
6 . \ \ �`� _ ^ � N_ -
.�`�.� �� � " �—�
. � � '
'� .�� v 6 )q w�wan w . .
�. + �� •„ \
,.� � �� 6• - - . .
� ♦ �
G � �'Jr �Y)(,,,�. d,� W�6 . � M 1
\,�� � e' \
�,t` "�..1 � S:!� �%
,_ �: ,. � `� ,
�t F«Z�```: .;�,�1,,�^I; �� �� �. ...�.o
�� .'�.�t 7'A �\r' .� . \\\ \• 6.��.;� �1 . ..� �=��1n�_
•��/ ` �. , � ��
� �4'.y / '.�:,�tl` � �\ �` �� d' _"
a �,� 1..... ' �C �`, . �. , .'. � \ f
�s �
" � 1 tll'�`�t_ `�.�:� !,-�; - \.\ _ . m'J, . . . . . .. __
.�� �1 � � �� y .�
� — — � /�, \
_I'' �. \�. " �/ �� V• \ �/y� L � �� �r7dd�
� � � � .l�' '�r: �i' � Y� ID77 LIC'T �+'W'O
�,` �• ~� r�,� - `�`` / , r;`i - \\ \\ � \1
� � � ! - _ V .��� ' __ \ v, \•\\ �!
. ; . ._ � L �` ' \ � �O
���~T �� '\ ` � d�
yM MlIA \�
!� "__ . . . \ \\ ' ... . ' —
. __i� -' `� . � '
� -- ._ . � ,�. _ �� , ..- ` .
�� �` . .�\ \ I`.
... ` ' �.
I$ I"r�� �l` -� _ � \• '
r-.. r v - � . - � ��'��' ... . \. . .
��f � - _ _ i ' ^ � � \; A `. � .
�_ ; — _ J \�J � 1�-... . ' ' �, l \ \\\ ' , '
1� L_� -�. �` Q L `z \ \ \\ •
_ � �i
� _ _' ` �\ `;__ .� .. . . �. - \ \S\
.. Sr �\ . \ �\ �
Q7�l1�'J „�` ' � `� ~.' . \ \ � \\\
� _ "� �L ��, � w� M \ � \ ��'
� �-__ Q � " � ; , - - \\\\/�� \;.
� � • _ � - __ .� `_�" � N
. � . � �. - • .��:"—*s:_"--_cr--°-- �
y� 1
---- ; �----� _ . ... . , _ ., . A:= 1
� � . - y '- .i, - - -W . '.• \ K ' ' .\ 1
N � - � \� ___,_ � � 1
� '__ ; � � � . �.
�- g ��
- i WOwM��Y r.� v�, ' r-� A\
'�. ° : �� � ' C ,--' �;�C - ', \
�t •t �°��� �' t ^ „�`� \
� . �
„ � � �� .� , �
' _ � n�. ' i ' ' �: ; `�"i ,
�y ' --- .•�� - � '� .� � E � N�5 ... _�r_ �\
, • •� .' � � \
. - - -
� � � �
, ...... �
. � � , � � y ��.
! � •
. �.- ----• � \�
_ o� � ' ,s 11� �psr` ` `� ,
1�-- : - � �s r+�� �•. � RSg� . `�4t
- � �i '"�� ' 1�:. "'L�._J� W � ..� .. d. ' � �2��. �S
is w�s�o _ "'�y�. a�; •
t. , ��t:
_._ G i : '�'' ... .. � , . '��' , \
f y i I' t., `
� �TQT[�X� OO
��� /� ��
Exhibit 4
� �_._ _ ----- .•-•—_ / %, /
� . _-- -.._ ---� .--------• ...._ ..__.. �/ .' / �
--- ---- - �� � �. -� _'....
---- � l , .
3�. S - �
----- � �,� - 33�i �
._.._ n _ ,i �C�'�� _ _.._
- " __�"'; ;' = ' c fi/ _.� �
t i .
� � � j �J . f �"�
� � � , ► � � ��� -° . -..__--- `V -
__' ' � � �'J __ 3 s`I �
� Ly
.
� ��1-�`�;. SorJ Av� ,
_..___ � ,_.. � � � �O
� / --- ' � � ity_.�_�1_. - -�----
i P,Q � ' _36� � Ot1
:" D i �J�O� �+�a � �.J
�. (�- ..Y.
� 3?a
� '�// .^ ! "�q� _
. ci� /i � .._..._ 377._ � �£�2 _..�__
� � . � .._.,... ... ... � 3��c. ~383 ,�
% � � .. _..... .._...__. 3�� 3$7
• ; I (� ---- ---- - �'! -�° ry_._._._
; � 3�5 x �77
� � .._ _:���.��^ � 3�8 __ _
; � �
�
1 � � ._ . .___ ya s~ - --.)
� .
! �
ti �
j .. .._. _ _......_. .. ._.
. i i._� Y97i
�
-! -: � P��. Ac� ST
„,.,�,,., .
4�'1('F,S I.ICENSING ACT HUMAN SERVICES LICENSING AC1' § 245A.11
rn�h' thrnt;�;hout the scate, (4)adjust fundin�;mechanisms by rule as needed to reflect the requirements established
ng ru ie�s t he commissioner by rule for services being provided;
ieµ�rtm��nts and agencies; (5)review and recommend staff educational requirements and staff training as needed;
t tht� di����rs�ty of political ' and
ersuns using the progr�m �; (6)review and make changes in rules relating to residential care and service programs
of licens<� holdets affected i for persons with mental illness as the commissioner may determine necessary.
:one; shaU choose indi�•idu- . gubd. 3. Housina services for
� of urban, suburban, and Person9 w�ith mental illness. The commissioner of
� human services shall study the housing needs of people with mental illness and shall
” articulate a continuum of services from residential treatment as the most intensive
fea,�ible th� commissioner � service throu�h housing programs as the least intensive. The commissioner shall develop
� a���� �'��i���rcement k� the recommendations for implementing the continuum of services and shall present the
'ude: recommendations to the legislature by January 31, 1988.
5' be �;ranted; Laws 1987, c. 333. § 10, eff. July 1, 1987.
cve been sl;own to predict
liance H�ith the accredita- Z��A.10. Fees
���s� <31"� The commissioner shall charge a fee for evaluation of applications and inspection of
1s that ha�e been show�n Pr°grams, other than family day care and foster care, which are licensed under sections
245A.01 to 245A.1G.
') or (3) c,�n be used in �ws 1987, c. 333, § 11, eff.July 1, 1987.
�der section 245A.10 by
� 245A.11. Special conditions for residential programs
health, ublic safet• � Subdivision l. Policy statement.It is the policy of the state that persons shall not be
�and c•c�rt f;cation ru]ea � excluded by municipal zoning ordinances or other land use regulations from the benefits
on is ;�d,;,�nQstrati�e1y of normal residential surroundings.
Rould not reduce the Subd. 2. Permitted eingle-family residential uae. Residential programs with a
:s. �i'h�,re administra- ' ���ng� �pacity of siu or fewer persons shall be considered a permitted single-family
the comn,issioners of residential use of property for the purposes of zoning and other land use tegulations.
int a�enc�• inapections Subd. 3. Permitted multifamily residential use. Unless otherwise provided in any
; town, municipal, or county zoning regulation, a licensed residential pmgram with a
liealth, ��ut�lic safety, licensed capacity of seven to 16 adulta or children shal) be considered a permitted
!icauon fo� applicants multifamily residential use of property for the purposes of zoning and other land use
of the commissioners regulations. A town, municipal,or county zoning authority may require a conditional use
or special use permit to assure proper maintenance and operation of a residential
program. Conditions imposed on the residential program must not be more restrictive �
-e up to two years, than those imposed on other conditional uses or s -
same zones, unlesa the additional conditions are n�ecessary to�pme��theh�jthn�d �'
safety of the adults or children being served by the program, Nuthing in sections
��� i��negs� 245A.01 to 245A.16 ahall be construed to exclude or protubit residential programs from .;�
single-family zones if otherwise permitted by ]ocal zoning regntationa.
�th a menta] illaeas gubd. 4. I,ocatlon of rtaldentlsl
: this requirement ia Proe*ams. In deternnining whether to grant a
r of human aaviaes uceA�+ the commissioner ahall specif'x�ally consider the population, size, laad nse plan, -
� u�g�' availability of community servicea, and the number and size of exiating }icensed rear °
dentisl programs in the town, municipality, or county in which the
opetate a residential �PP�t °�� t° "
' � residentiai ro p�°l. The commissioner shaU not graut sn init�l lioe�e to snq
t�tr�tment needs P B� if the residential program wi71 be within 1,320 feet of sn existin
_� , residential program anlesa the town, municipality, or county zonm8 authOrity 8raata the : r �:
�< residential program a conditional use or sPecial use permik In eities of the �rs t c l a s s,
p s r t s 9 5 2 0.p 5 p p t h i s s u b d i v i s i o n a p p l i e s e v en i f a resi den t i a l m T
P Bi'�n���sidered a permitted single-fam- �'•
�nm of residential ily residential use of pro p e r t y und�au b d i v i s i o n 2. F o s t er care h omes are p�empt fmm ��.
thia aubdivision. �,�,x.fi:
'�t'O"�o Peraons 3ubd. 5, Overconeentrstion and diepenaL (a) Before January 1, 1985� each county ��'``��
having two or more group residential programs within 1,32p f�t of each other shall '` �
55
a>
, .,.
��.�
, �a; w .,,. , .
� - ,.
, . , .
. . . __
. -
. � 4, ,
.
�,,a - .. � . �._��f .�a._ � t .} . . , ''
. , � ^4 5� .4 H ./�p�.+ �. �'.
� # ,yy �Y g - . . . . i `:�+.
��� � �..�� '; . . • . � , . .
. . '. ;�* t +T,3 , . .
. y
. :.�� ..i ..t.:t� <_:. .._ . ... -..�_. . . ._ .. .
— .�.�...,_,_....____.�. _..__._ .........._ ._.._�
§ 245A.11
' HUi�iAN SER�'ICES LICENSING ACT
liUf�fA\ SF.ItI
submit to the department of human serviccs a plan to promote dis rsal of
residential pmgrams. In formulating its plan, the county shall solicit the artici ation of
' affected � �r011P sioner's desi;;r.
��png� P�S�m4, municipalities havin T ]��. p� P residential pro;
Rram populations, and advocacy groups. For the purpolses of this subd'v sion c'Iu h� that the comrr�
�' concentrated" means having a population in residential prograrns serving seven or more susi�ended or r
(�etsons that exceeds one-half of one percent of�the population of a recognized planning rro�d�ma�Fe�
� district or other administrative subdivision. p g
� (b) Within 45 days after the county submits the pian, the commissioner shall cerlify Program f�or wi
whether the plan ful�lls the u �roceedin s ��
- following requirements: P �O3QS and requirements of this subdivision includin� the licens�ce of the
five days after:
s (1)a new program serving seven or more persons must not be located in any recognized residential prot
� planning district or other administrative subdivision where the population in residential
' programs is highly concentrated; controtl;r,g pers
�� Subd. 2. A
(2) the county plan must promote dispersal of highly concentrated residential program receivership is �
° pcipulations; being served t��
� (3) the county plan shall promote the development of residential programs in areas that commissioner's
; are not highly concentrated; gram. The cuu
(4) no person in a residential program shall be displaced as a result of this section until account�] rele�
a relocatiun plan has been implemented that provides for an acceptable alternative must be a�d b�
placement; the receicershi}:
(5)if the plan provides for the relocation of residential programs, the relocation must be receiver or any
• completed by January 1. 1990. If the commissioner certifies that the plan does not do so, allowance for p
the commissioner shall state the reasons, and the county has 30 days to submit a plan Subd. 3. Pc
amended to comply with the requirements of the commissioner. order, a receive
(c? After July 1, 1985, the commissioner may reduce �rants under section 245.73 to a �ry receirershi
county required to have an approved plan under paragraph(a)if the county does not have res�denUal prag
a plan approved by the commissioner. The county board has the right to be provided with their health, saf
ad�ance notice and to a residential proQ
hearing within 30 days of the otif�ti nLSOf ntentdto�reduce grants cthe teomm ss ner �'e1fare of the j
shall not certify any reduction in elimination of d�
in accordance with the contested c,�a�e p�visions of chapter 14ucted and a decision made If the correctic
structure of the
Subd. 6. Hospitals; exemptlon. 8esidential programs located in hospitals shal] be immediate trans
exenpt from the provisions of this section. the recei�ership
Laws 1987, c. 333, § 12, eff.July 1, 1987. to guarantee t},
served by the r
245A.12. Voluntary re�eiverahip for residential facilities expens?s. The :
A majority of controllin to the cost incur
commissioner to assume oper�a on of he re idential program thr ugh appointmen of a fee set under :
receiver. On receiving the request for a receiver, the commissioner may enter into an comprising the r
plant,shall be ir
agreement with a majority of controlling persons and provide for the appointment of a valid obligatioi�s
receiver to operate the residential program under conditions acceptable to both the from rental pa�
commissioner and the majority of controlling persons. The agreement must specify the
terms and conditions of the receivership and preserve the rights of the Subd. 4. R�
served by the residential ro P p persons being appointed under
p gram. A receivershi set u under this section terminates at determined by t
�e b� BP��ed bY the parties to the agreement or 30 days after either of the parties P P�F
gives written notice to the other party of termination of the receivership agreement. erson and
I.awa 1987, c. 333, § 13, eff.July 1, 1987. is not personall}
Subd. S. Te
245A.1�. Iavoluntary recetvenhip for residential facilities date on which it
Subdivision 1. Application. The commiasioner may petition the district court in the the fotlowing ev
county where the residenqa� p��m y� ��� for an order directing the controlling (1, � 8 n�
persona of the residentia] pi,pgr� � ghaN, �use why the commissioner or the commis- should be
� (2) a new licet
�..._.�.._ � ._.._. �__..�. �. ,R_..__._. �
. s�
v. y
; Q ` V h
� �
t
V
E � c ,�' ,.' ,_' '� ,QZ z Z Z Z v�
ev �
�
L+ � ^ �
C
_°o d ��' Q Q ¢ ¢ Q C Q Q � ^+ �_
cz. a �v Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z �
0
N
� �
� d
E = a C a U U U ^
E e �� b � 2R �' o � c� � o c`� 'G
y Y �� -' O O O O O O O O v� �
w ` O �3 M M M M M r+1 c+1 M
� y ..a Ra
a ° �,i
� �
�
� � —
� .a .c � .c .a r� � � s e�
� N N N N N N N N p �
h �
�i t.� ►, � 4. � Q�
� .. � 3 � �D p .t� .fl b � � .� � � � � v � O
v� ° °� N � � � '-'- � '� 3 ' v � 3 � � o °
cr. F o � > �, ,� > � p
� a 9 0o p ro � op p p v oo --� �U
" r O
6 "� � � •-� ,n .c = � •: ,,, ,� .� a�i
� � � � O �O et � O� O� '� "" � �- c3 � " � ►+ cS O �
� C. Z E "' N �„ ,� � v N �, t V u v1 �
� " ..�. � 3 n� 00 -� � 3v00 �
� E
a � � � a � -� r .c �
� A RS cS Rf ed ed � � •D �"
p U
� O v1 v1 V1 v'f v1 � ei cs y
t+'f N N N N N � y� � `
N N �A �
t�
K N
� �
o� y a y O O O O O O O O E �
a� � '�' (y M M M M � � .� y� O
_ � � �
E �
" a
�V1 y �< c�
it... l� V�
a o '' M � ch � rn M M v� E
-� '°' � �o
� t/1 O h
Q O�
�O
... Y 'fl
�
N = � � d O O O O v1 �
!A r � � � 00 �C U1 '7 N v � � 6�
E a '�
� U
E M v �
.Q � c
•°- � o 0 0 0 �, � � �
� o �y w d o o O O _
, ` o,� �D N O O 'C V �
a � o: t� vi ri v v v .� a
�
Q
ed
= N a cs es r +� =
F- '«.
- V e e c c � e°i
�, 0./ U U U rJ �
� � f-• 'v 'v 'n 'v aHi y >. �, �, �
N N N Vl w/
!/� w � '� '� '� r
— ' p cY, tY. c� c� >, a .... c� _ n _ u
= C � �, >, >, �, � v�i u- � lt, r• lt„ a
� � Q •� •� •� •� � o c� � e> �� c� � a
_ .c au au a � Q
� �� �-. co cs c� c� �;' a •., 't? :p _, 'O
_ N z w ti. w �.t. 0 3 N = y '� o
�. Ca � a � a H F. � t� � oG � ci Z
� o �-. O O O O �,, —
� W � n� M v E-� E-� � � � ¢ �.
,c �o l� OG tY �: t� CL� QG CL' OG � ?
gs �TqTuX�
- � �— /� � �
.`,,� r, �,��.
��
! INEBPA� � �
� ��T ��D B � .
� �SII��SS
,: _ _
PROF�SSIONAL ASS �.
� �
For
September ss, 19ss B E T T ER B U SI NE S S
Zoning Section of the Planning and
Economic Development Department
Room 1101, City Hall Annex
25 W. 4th Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Dear Council President James Scheibel,
ThE West End Business and Professional Association opposes
the granting of special condition use permits to Family Style
Homes for the properties located at 386 Duke, 383 Colburne,
and 397 Colburne.
Let us give you some facts and observations regarding our
opposition to the special condition use permits.
West 7th/District 9 is overconcentrated with residential
treatment facilities. It is 683 % overconcentrated
based on the patient to corrmunity population ratio.
The denial of the special condition use pe=mits will not
reduce the population of 175 at Family Style Homes.
The denial of the special condition use permits will
prevent Family Style Homes from landbanking additional
property.
In a City Council Resolution, published Septernber 1,
1984, Family Style Homes agreed to terminate the permits
for these three properties by October 1, 1988.
"The mission statement of family style homes is to provide
more and better, state-of-the-art services to the
chronically mentally ill at less cost to the camwnity."
Given the above facts, if Family Style Homes wishes to
provide "state-of-the-art services", the first thing the
organization can do is honor the contract it made with the
City Council and West 7th corrmunity in 1984.
�ncerely,
1,,C��. � C�
Tim Bartusch, President
n.
�
R w I
� N A A
�.,.,,, _
�.• r � s Z� M � � � t
1
� ! �O � . �se. w ` � r.� �
r �
� ��♦ � �� + � .rs� � � � � � � -
1 �
• � � S
a�r .r+.� r i „rq.,� •
� , t
Z � = d , ;
� ��� r � �r M �
s 'K' ♦ _
��� � 11 f j � � � t • s• �
...s. �
� � ���� N �' ^ �
,'.
.._ �,, . i � 7: E � s . ..
i � r.,.... � = 4 . � .
i i • . ;
t "' p "' ...
6 = � ,..... .� � � �I�a M
'� . . . .,. ., - . ...
� � 4i, /�. ""� �� y. .
��r' M �
' 16: ` �. � t .
� � :
i r�.. .. # � s�••` • � = s . F� �
. ;
` �. _ 14 ...,�. � •9 �;. �_�. ` �� . ` �,, °'
�
i � • � � , � � �
1 � E : ` � � ! t � r � � 3 �
� "�� -" ) �'� � f �
w aa � •
� � e �` «. 1 1
. 15 s , �
� s ...... .. • � '�
� �
, .�.. � .
� '� " �
� ,�� �,
_ �,'� '\ M
�--�' .. � ,
- �' • �s � s�.
.v
CITIZEN PARTICIPA7ION PLANNING DISTRIC7S
1.SUNRAY-BATTIFCREEK-HIGHl�100D
2.6REATf R EAST S I DE
3.WEST SIDE
� • ' � 4.DAY70N'S BLUFF .
� S.PAYNE-PHALEN
S.NORTH END .
7.THOMAS-DALE
8.SUM �NIVERSITY
YF
i1.HAMLINE-MIDWAY ,
12.ST. ANTHONY
13.MERRIAM PK.-LEXING70�� HAM,LIHE
i4.GROVEIAND-MACALESTER --"'~" 1�� Id;�_
15.H1GHLAND ����� �1
16.SUMMI7 NIII Z
' l 7.OOktVT OM�
�.i v v O �-' / Ca � �
�f 0 0 Q O O �/ v
ih , ,^: . �� . Q�..... .�.v F' �w�w;:...'�
'.r `+1 ��:: .���i4Yi�.;,•.:..•�,., .�r:�" ` (/� �yI�� . �i'.::w` ~���• . .��
.A��l ��:V�� b .ff/ .:.� �:;�� fj.,�'L ::�� ��w :�� '��•-�_ '
,,,`"��i':��"�"� � •.0�.Y��
'r�:� �� ..���•�:•� ���ii�'ri �' r � .•�••� - .• �'.:"' �.
GRACE �= ��� S �.
� ���:_=� ��=���::
S -.�,='
0 0 0 0
0
0 0 .
o �- o o •
. ° � ° -- °
0
- CLAY—ST. -
-�- o o '
0 0 � dOMIN�S7RATt;4 C�NtE4 I
� �PVe��c sc►+oo���
� • R O O
. •
Q O
J, •R O O G -O- O
, JEFFERSON AVE. .
g ..
�� � o 0 0 ��:;��=�
� �u ': .,,; .
OO O ::i' i
' O O O � O �..:..;•r/ ,
:;. ��. �.
..j.�:.''�: � .
O O Q � :.:;: ,' ��>=Q
O O p � v ::.: ��' i��?��
p � : , i.:�:-�_:.
0 0 � - ���=��.''�� ' -�� � �
O� o p p i-=:`::::�: :
v :::'.�.r`� .- -
� ::� �::._:;.<: z
^/ V O O •i•' �'�="
.�! � -�- :::�1:�: .. _.:.
•j V _.�.• ��1�:=.. -
—— 0 � :`� -
O v -�=��� � �::::.:=:==��.. _ ,
.:�:�
�.-� .
O �' .:i�~::iF'`�r' , L, - ���..
� f� � �.r' : T_-:z. .-,..
� V � O � .,i�• ��".`'�:�...:'�' � _;ti%^' .
� ,� :� I:�`��`.":::=.` `.. -=:=-.•
:..•.-�'
.
,:.,•
� PALACE �T :.�:::�:::��`�::�.�
� :.
V +;�...;.: ::.� :
� ���' _ � > /: �
_ :� •..+•'�� _.v ` �
y.rl• ,r .! � t
�:- . <�;i � f—-
•:T� .:_�
•l - ,
�� . , �
=_"'J � f. ':
1
Ja�AES ST.
.. :: —,"a � � �
v i ���~y7a1lr�• 1 �� - � ��'' �'��`:� •���
�.'�'''"' ��'' r'i� �� � "� _
. �,������ `.:.r`• •�� !�
AREA MAP
APPLICANT Fam1� S I 0 �". � LEGEND
38(�Duk�e � 3g3,�3S7 Colbocne, ZONING DISTRICT BOUNOARY
PURPOSE F#/O yg . � SUBJECT PROPERTY
O ONE FAMILY p�qN��
Ff�E No. I 0 31 q �
TWO FAMILY ��s7R�cT z
DATE � — 2 ' S 8 �� O MULTIPI,E FAMlLY q
• • � COMMERCIAL
tJWD USE �
SCALE � I"= 200� NORTH � �� �NOUSTRIAL Mqp NQ �
L►��u� w."' �' ' -------- ��"�_---- � � - '