The URL can be used to link to this page

88-1619 WHITE - C�TV CLERK PINK - FINANCE COUIICII / CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL � �/{O( � BLUE �- MAVOR File NO. � � , Cou 'l Resolution " " �G� Presented By Referr o Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul at its meeting on August 26 , 1988 , approved a site plan for a parking lot to be located at Selby and Arundel Streets in the City of Saint Paul , the parking lot to be developed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul and the Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul ; and WHEREAS , Sarah Rubinstein, 442 Dayton Avenue , Saint Paul , Minnesota, 55102 , appealed this decision of the Planning Com- mission to the 5aint Paul City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Saint Paul Legislative Code alleging that the notice of hearing mailed to property owners on behalf of the Planning Commission was not in compliance with the provisions of the Zoning Code and therefore the Planning Commission' s hearing was defective ; and WHEREAS, the City Council did, on September 22 , 1988 , conduct a public hearing on the appeal as filed by Sarah Rubinstein, at which time the Council heard from all interested parties and having considered the matter does hereby RESOLVE, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul based upon the following findings of fact, does hereby deny the appeal made by Sarah Rubinstein and does hereby uphold the decision made by the Planning Commission in this matter. The facts on this matter as found by the City Council are as follows : (1 ) The Housing Authority and Port Authority submitted a site plan to the Planning Commission for review and approval pursuant to the provisions of. Section 62. 108 . (2) The provisions of Section 64. 300 provide that the Planning Commission shall consider site plans and shall conduct a hearing on the proposed site plan and are required to provide COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Dimond �� In Favor Goswitz Rettman �he1be� _ Against BY Sonnen Wilson Form Approved City Attorney Adopted hy Council: Date Certified Yassed by Council Secretary BY— � � By _� �, Approved by lVlavor: Date _ Appcov d by Mayor for Submission to Council V By By . . , � � ��9 written notice of the time and place of the public hearing to all owners of record of property located within 350 feet of the proposed site . (3) That a notice was mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the proposed site and the notice stated that the hearing would be held before the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 26, 1988 and the location given in this notice was the Council Chambers located on the 3rd floor of the City Hall and Court House. (4) That the Planning Commission did in fact hold a public hearing on the proposed site plan on August 26 , 1988 at its regular meeting time but the hearing was held on the 13th floor of the City Hall Annex. Upon being notified of the error in the location set forth in the notice, staff of the Department of Planning and Economic Development positioned themselves at the City Council Chamber door for the purpose of notifying people that the correct location of the hearing was in the City Hall Annex. ( 5) That Sarah Rubinstein, the appellant in this matter , went to the City Council Chambers at the noticed time for the public hearing and upon observing that the doors were locked obtained information advising her that the hearing was in fact being conducted in the City Hall Annex. The appellant then did appear at the Planning Commission public hearing and was permitted to present her views at this hearing. (6) That the City, through its Department of Planning and Economic Development, the Planning Commission, and the office of City Clerk, did not receive complaints from any other party concerning the error in the Planning Commission notice or complaining that they were not given an opportunity to appear at the Planning Commission hearing to present their views . (7) That the Planning Commission and staff of the Department of Planning and Economic Development did take reasonable steps to notify interested parties of the correct location of the Planning Commission hearing as soon as they were notified of the error in the notice. 2. WHITE - C�TV CLERK PINK - FINANCE COVACII CANARV - DEPARTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL BL,U¢�. �- MAVOR File NO. /�/g � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date (8) That the proposed parking lot at Selby and Arundel Streets has been the subject of many other public hearings held both by the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul , the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Saint Paul and the Saint Paul City Council and therefore sufficient and adequate public exposure of this proposed parking lot has been provided. (9) That the appellant has not shown that she has in any manner been deprived of her opportunity and right to present her views to the Planning Commission on this proposed site plan and therefore has not established that she has in fact suffered any injury because of the defect in the notice of hearing as mailed out on behalf of the Planning Commission. and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Sarah Rubinstein, the Zoning Administrator and the Planning Commission. 3. COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays D�i+nvn� Lu� [n Favor Goswitz Rettman � g� Against BY Sonnen Wilson �CT n '�g$8 Form Appro e by City om Adopted by Council: Date Cerlified Pass y C u '1 Sec By � r . By i� A►pprov b 1Aavor: Date ° �i4-1�1p Appra�ve�by Mayor for Submission to Council �. �� B BY P��?��;��:� ��i 1 � 1988 s � , . _ ��y' � ' � N:° 1 75 . . , -� � _ 2 _ - 1 DEPARTMENT � CONTACT NAME PHONE � DATE ASSIGN NUMBER FOR 80UTING ORDER: (See reverse sidn.) _ Department Director _ Mayor (or Assistant) _ Finance aad Management Services Director _ City Clerk _ Budget Director _ _ City Attorney _ TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES: (Clip all locations for signature.) �T WILL BE ACHIEVE�? BY TAKING ACTION ON THE ATTi�CHBD MATERIA�,S? (PurposeJRat'3anale) �rG Gt '6 fi S'c�ta� ��+exrTe�� -�i�►p� ��rMKlic�• � w�� a � @ 1r/{r%� �dw�w►�rr.o� r�v� O�' �► �'r � � �'� � � °�IP � ��" � �.t- �.t �� .�1 �v��+.l- COST/BENEFIT. BUDGETARY. AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: FINANCI�tG SUURCE �,ND BUDGET ACTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signature not required if under $10,000.) Total Amount of TrAnsgction: Activity Nuntber: Funding Source: ATTACHMENTS: (List and number all attachments.� Council Research Center. SEP 2� 1988 �iDMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES _Yes _No Rules, Regulations, Procedures, or Budget Amendaent reqaired? _Yes _No If yes, are they or timetable attached? ' DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW _Yes No Couricil resolution required? Resblution required� ,_;_,Yes _No _Yes No Insurance required? Insurance sufficie�t? �Yes _No Yes No Insurance attached? � ' RETURN TO JEROME SEGAL AFTER ADOPTION) ' —-- WH�TE - C1TY CLERK PINK - FINANCE COI1flC11 CANARV - DEPARTMENT G I TY O F SA I NT PAU L File NO. �`�/�/ SLUE - MAVOR � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul at its meeting on August 26 , 1988, approved a site plan for a parking lot to be located at Selby and Arundel Streets in the City of Saint Paul , the parking lot to be developed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul and the Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul ; and WHEREAS , Sarah Rubinstein, 442 Dayton Avenue , Saint Paul , Minnesota, 55102, appealed this decision of the Planning Com- mission to the Saint Paul City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Saint Paul Legislative Code alleging that the notice of hearing mailed to property owners on behalf of the Planning Commission was not in compliance with the provisions of the - Zoning Code and therefore the Planning Commission' s hearing was defective ; and � WHEREAS , the City Counc 1988 , conduct a public hearing on Sarah Rubinstein, at which time the ested parties and having considered t RESOLVE, that the Council based upon the following findings of � �l�'� �peal made by Sarah Rubinstein and G�,� � ision made by the Planning Commiss -acts on this matter as found by the C (1) The Housing Authorit tted a site plan to the Planning C� oval pursuant to the provisions o£ Se (2) The provisions of S� the Planning Commission shall consi ___� ��a�� conduct a hearing on the proposed site plan and are required to provide COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Dimond Long In Favor Goswitz . Retttnan Scheibel A gai ns t BY Sonnen Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secretary By— By Approved by \�lavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ,4 . written notice of the time and place of the public hearing to all owners of record of property located within 350 feet of the proposed site. w (3) That a notice was mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the proposed site and the notice stated that the hearing would be held before the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 26 , 1988 and the location given in this notice was the Council Chambers located on the 3rd floor of the City Hall and Court House. (4) That the Planning Commission did in fact hold a public hearing on the proposed site plan on August 26, 1988 at its regular meeting time but the hearing was held on the 13th floor of the City Hall Annex. Upon being notified of the error in the location set forth in the notice, staff of the Department of Planning and Economic Development positioned themselves at the City Council Chamber door for the purpose of notifying � people that the correct location of the hearing was in the ' City Hall Annex. (5) That Sarah Rubinstein, the appellant in this matter, went to the City Council Chambers at the noticed time for the public hearing and upon observing that the doors were locked obtained information advising her that the hearing was in fact being conducted in the City Hall Annex. The appellant then did appear at the Planning Commission public hearing and was permitted to present her views at this hearing. . (6) That the City, through its Department of Planning and Economic Development, the Planning Commission, and the office of City Clerk, did not receive complaints from any other party concerning the error in the Planning Commission notice or complaining that they were not given an opportunity to appear at the Planning Commission hearing to present their views . (7) That the Planning Commission and staff of the Department of Planning and Economic Development did take reasonable steps to notify interested parties of the correct location of the Planning Commission hearing as soon as they were notified of the error in the notice. 2. • ' WNI7E - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANGE. G I TY O F SA I NT PA LT L Council GANARV - OEPARTMENT � � FIIE� NO. BLUE - MAYOR � Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date (8) That the proposed parking lot at Selby and Arundel Streets has been the subject of many other public hearings held both by the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul , the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Saint Paul and the Saint Paul City Council and therefore sufficient and adequate public exposure of this proposed parking lot has been provided. (9) That the appellant has not shown that she has in any manner been deprived of her opportunity and right to present her views to the Planning Commission on this proposed site plan and therefore has not established that she has in fact suffered any injury because of the defect in the notice of hearing as mailed out on behalf of the Planning Commission. and, be it � FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Sarah Rubinstein, the Zoning Rdministrator and the Planning Commission. 3. COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Dimond �� [n Favor Goswitz - Rettman Scheibel Against BY Sonnen Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Cerlified Passed by Council Secretary BY BS' Approved by ;Vlavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ��" } fi-, kt '?! �t j : .�x� k xc: y Jt_�.. .? �q�,"�1,' �;'a i�. [ �!�.4i r4'y" i-aRr }'.;^°AS M'�7:,� �,ry a aF^ +�. y`� � �,��Y d � �';. �P^l�� t �} �1 41"..� �PTYS Y �,�ip �� }� h'i -G"�r+„ � �I'. 'i^: .�p��Ytf p ^t`,�M .:ttx 35;�� i T:T. ��r..:. +�� ;fr �� ..f° �;'�' s�r c;5-t (t Pv`il��„' I ''� I��°,i ,�r ��z e'� t `� "�f" A J � "��,t :,��' K�;�J� y� ��y�,t�!'�j��<er, ?a . � i`' ��tt�'',�' `�"^r� � °t �t�, ��.� s3 �',. , "4t .�{{� � f� # ' ' �Y ti5(�3,�'�;,.�3'.f� 7a t�$ .� y��.� t��t._. � ��t,� �� ,f�l-�L. �t �' ,F)� 4 y' �,� � �;��I!'' a i'� .+ y y_: ��.� N., r 4 ��l�-h�'l'�� ' !{ �K h� ��y F x�Sj ,L� . ..0 1 t 3 , '� C '`j- r'i� �.i�� ":) � J t'}�' .;:��-,i' 1� . 4.�� 1 1 t� y� ro �` ',,� �-�,�.l,� �'v}.i,�� i i '�3"w � .�� y��,�'k i r�F+; ? 5s ... c -£ t�. �� ,.! i � 1..,r ..�.� �,�� '4tr . , 1. �% �+ � � � ? .. � �� ,Z ,��: M^z.� -a,^c ...� � '-� � }� Y9�q ` 4 3��,'��r :� � � � ., 1 -� s �. P fy :.�� i �5 �, / A 4 .. yd� 1�Sgx�.i a .s � fi <_��} 'o.� ;�.i � � 4 .� 1 �r *�rj ..:,t i ky 1. �.��1 � �' a: �_+ � ' � ' !� o �, 5 � t d � '�,� y i� .r,�� rT.#�°N. -t-y i 1,j A � -i' }T y4' y . r r X ti :. � ' { '� � f �'.,. � 1 ' .��P,X * ,� `f F p e .� %i"y��i �kt�'' .-. a �. �' N ��i �. � � � y� 1 k � �-:r itl' 1 v � 's � �; r. �� ) �. ��„ 3 ..4 r ��yy 44� , � . k ` � 3. r �,� � i `".' t � r �.6 �z i tl ��, 4 �k �� 7 � �� 4a�k � �,a 'y ; � T S' 4 �'4 ,'1 '� r �� ,`- ''� 3 f � '�i � r y�. i'F, t i� r �- ��c ';�' K ,� E � . 4 - r :#F }� r p't' .. �'�f i,t I �'� f., s� v}A- :� � � t i� 7 �` .i i � r�� ., � s '�� t� {rY� t -: i .� ..�� r • ({ ..,.� l ktj f i ' 7^ �.� �°1 t�,j��. � � '� 'i�*A ti i {Y:.x !� t� `� :m "��t .:.d�. �!:f `r ..� �..r 7 , A�7 � . � Y Ai �i� M."'i"t � � _,'f.� �!('N� �{ � �� 8� }��_��'� �. i;! {7.'� r �� ,i I" . " �� « ,�� " ' �v 3 ;�;` �:� � :.q #r �r fi 3� r� �� £ ��g��'I ��r wkx ��,�^ �t� f ., �,,,, s :� � ic e � y� �.i : .� �M9 � � 7'��4�� r .� r �} ., \ �� ..� � � �� y ; ' � k � � _ t'� r � '� ��'�+� E i � � �� 3. r��r �S. " � x,' �}� � , . � '� t r e �� & 7�' � i o �..° � � � � r + n� � �, 4 ; �. v .��y�, � S r ,�+;1 �;+ c :� t� " .,� , +T v . � .��.k�Sja �� ; � �� t� �,r� .n t � r � a �� w- .�'� � b. �i�� 4� 'Y�.�t� � • r ��' ��.'�.� ti � .� A r� � 4 � � �� t^�� ' � � � � y�;� �y� a k f,�� f� a�� .i� � � �P v� � �r . r � f �� :+ � r ,� � ,,, �� #t�� ,.�i�� .- i � �� T '� y ' '"�^` � � r� � � �� '` i 1 r � r'- �+A��,,.F �"q f � l� -. � t {b� y `'i � �ti e+ 4 y�. �k ��i � i .a r� + n� �' � �. r 1 N :� , °'dt � i 't� � 1Vr � � i� t 1�� x 'x t �,i � �` t �� e ^r x ey'� � � � ' y�� 1 � , ��: -y ! � q , J � _„ I� t�" �,X Y7 � t+ . � �� y g . , �� I.;.I� t � ;� t � } :tl }..' li� �. �: v� r..� r s � �s ` 5 \� i. ( � � 9 vr �� r+ � � �I lr ;�¢y r � � ,t �. � '� � . � f r � t�, J t',' � k� y 1� . � � .�r t �f r (� Y,�ti � �� f � .f s y � � 'x�>`v�i!,r � � ,iq� �� NF��` 1 ." .� � Jr1 ,� ° .�ra ,� �}, rr I i �l I�f ��k � ,�, f.. .1 . , � � K. �:' `F,+ 1 i �F r�e�� r t 1 � � ! ��.N I� ��.- y l .�:Y b� . t 1 c y'' � � h � � \� � � �' � W <4 f n s i ,�Y. 1� � � �� 4'' ,� t Z f _ �.� _� �� )t � � ?rti '�k'�1 � r"t" 1� } V ,1� �,� t t � � ! � 1" i }\ Q �' }y' - i , ` ��, �� "�� r z s� yh � .' i � .�:)j ��. h.� ! f�r �. ' � : .p �, ' y :i l i:: _ X o� % � ` �� 1( � �.� � '�,� ..� y� � � ;Y s�'^� � '. a ka �y�1 � �1 4 y � � ` s .� � : ,� 1� �' l i s !� ,p :t t�� 1: }t �i � � �{.�; ,4�"` i �� '� 1 _� � y °% r i:� ;�� , � ��( � i � yy�+q . 4 �V' J'��, l .� �� ::� r�Y � � `R � ( � � y"'. � .; � ( fe : � :� Y , r��, r�G� _�r i� r ' v' , . - 4�' i .} 'i �� s � •�• ��*t y- .f' 1�� . 1 . �� w �e r' h.• �f ..� /� � � Y� • ,.�� s t�,-�� _ ; ��. �� ' +;'� �° ,�. � �, .' � 't � �) � , �eJ ` u t f ' � � i�� Y � ..ry �F �• { F,y �i^'a�� t� � a a, ��i � ' � t+.� a:.� ,j#y 4 .ij: 'C�'vrt.z r x - . ��_,- � �� : '�. t ," � Z,� t I v �'. • � e ` P = � �, t ,� "' r�� ' �.� )� a _1 � ��a�� r,'T z£k f K n`,.� f '1;. L .. Y �t �.. y " � -4 ��,'P}� F jM � � .'F{ �Y �•:j _£`` �Y n � R ' � . ^� r ,�` �� s ,� � i'� � �x � '�� _'�-� � #: � �� r . . � �; �> r �l�} �� :' z� i �i . � � �3 ' I �'�� t.� z '� il�h �y �r\ � 5> � 1 � f:� '��. A�� `� f � �� .7 ti ' � :, 'f� jF),I i � � � � �l : � � ��.�R. ��f r `Y' h .�� .t � � i � �' I f i. ,!, k �+ .�� 1 � �;: �'�r'� .. � ",, f 1 5 y . �1` � �- �c � � �.,,'} ��`� t 3� . x . r '�S �, y� y. +, t?�� y-� ° '}�, �y.� 1C �, '- n" �� `1 ) , � A �.f .+ � � � .. `�t:y ,� � �x a�S4 �Fs / �� irN��Y`�4R�� I� �Rl�� §�Ir�� ' �� r 9 � � � /i i a,`" p �i��f71li��af ,�,. ��M�►�� 4�i �1F �Me��Y�1�$$$,,,,,,��" �.� � � 5 � y - t �� 'y� � � �i � �'.1 Q y�y� P f � ! : " �� TJ� f k � .t � �4r�.,�i� .� W,�1 .- tirt } �`� h. 2 � �_� '� �3.' �" ��_1 �.F x } t a � ,«�.; �� . �r '� �(- • ��+� .�: 1' �i { iM[i�1. ��'� O��..� . r ° . A� � '�� J ' ir� .� � _� x ��"v�� ' ��:.'� � .j '� ' � �� ,�•� 4 �"'� � ` . � � f', � ��,t ,4 { 'c A x . Z �7k r t' � ff �� i.� ;�.j � �� t fi,{ � S":� i�Y �1 E' � � � �; p � � �e . y� ;- p'�' z.. � � � �� n �i. ♦ ,? yr�F�. e�.�r •' e. 1 . ,� �:� �-.t r�a"� ' � ,1` � .._ k. � '�. ,� � � �' '� � v�a �, '�'�:/.: 3 �a"�,.� ��``:!G"�+H'4��F�,k' ( I � `� � ?, � "�,(- .t . � �S;i e',t m' � � '� � .� ti � �� A e �,; �• fi., w'Y �:� � al. �� Z r� i �,T `.�`i Fx j . � :� f .�lt y��7� �,� .1 ! �' }1E o 1 �' V S < : "'"�' ; { v.'.�; �� r« � �,�� 1 { t p:� t r.J: '',, j .; I l�� j �,r r:�°� � r} . � t� a _ w �. Y � / q^i,, � � �t�� }�. �Y a T :^� ��li . l F �f F �� . , �-^ ��'%l7k�f,i�d �� `4. { t� ;:��C� � :. \ :.jj :� �.��' � a r � ��F„ x : rv� .,�i + �� ry�� .� � _ t+' T 1' '.�. LV .. i ,� , E � 1 '��'/ �y r �57, � y . F � � � � � � �., a �� : . � ✓ � ,�„ , � 1t�.�� {] � �� / � �f ifi r �' � ��. � 1 vf . ,.' : i�i �:� '�l� y �r' ! y �. u � � �; / � � �. � S f�y,. �- 7� 5� "'✓ � ti 1 �1 i �'� 1 ' a- ✓ �x � ��' ��.� �:; } ��'- � t '� � �� ,_ !� 8 a � 1 r � z a ;i .:i� �1. j J ��t' . yr ,�. z �' �r: 4� �,� � ��r� � ��; �l #� �''-y � +Rr� 1 �:"��x . � � �: �� a � • - f a� .,, i ., t 1 ��`` ��. '�� , i � i° � c_ ,� � � C , �� i 1 Ra ._ � t �.. � t�� "{ .' �� .��' � ^� .� Y ��.� � � � � Y� .�', � r i - ir' r � '! �� ' ,� �� ffi � � � A ti u �Sr � 1 �R,�7 k�� ,r f �� r A �� q �< �, � � a �� . t� �,�.h '' �: ) ,U� 3 f (�kq � y� �. i a'Y�� i '� . i �� .�.'.! ,:.-r r � � � � t F = �S w..1 r� 'y^; t� ,�,' '� "� >?L s �';t �a .�� y i _ ( 'r ,�,i Y (� �L I�t .sY Id ' iTa- � 'I F : PJ4 ; � � ' - ',� e�. # � �� l' ir• � ��i :; � k_ { .-1�� h.�r � .. w '� xf .` ,T��,-'r ��`'� � .�! r ; f �.� � � �.� � �- � �.s. �f. k/,. t F . ( .t a ��y � �� } .�_� }� �. � , t .'�k I r y i f� i� 1 � � �_�fi .p A (� 1 '�;� ! i� �'��a�� !`, S- ?�, , 4 y�� ' � �,' '` ,�.'r �� - #� ^� �:.; � f f �� X `_"� i 1 i � �'�. �,r i .�( . ,. :: ttr , ^..w k r ` . � l' ' -F� `� a�� c �. � �: r�" E � � ,r t - � �' `t� t. :C � � �i '� ��x n � ��r�� ' ^ ,�� }.. 'r ,i }t�s fi '- � Y, �.*� �� 1�.t�F � .r r�� .� � � ; r rr �'-� � .�f R.� �?� 1 i � ,'� � . �� j �V � �t �- z� 1� T `"1 k' � � ' ` � r � °� � 'C �. � � t '=> t �� .�`__ �t '`� ; �� . i, i ,�� ' �}r s ' �.� �� . ! 1 . i i x ��.. 1 ��• �ro (. f-� v� J 1 u' p ;� � ; 1 ; �a t k. � .,� 1 r / - � � � t `� Y �`W�--' � . ` {� �y P (P i \ -� � � r '� �`. �' , a+� 1= d r k tv.: � ,� ) ,-� i :t '_� '`( ��`{.;: i Y� �:.; + .. ` � , . � 3, . � V 1 . '� 1.;� � y�,� ! 4 �.. � � . ' `� � �f. �. : l'{ ��. `X - i :� ��c*4_ � ��a �� -� �¢ � ��: � .,F , t k � `. �..r 'F- �i }�:� i "LS � '�:. g ��s .. , ' ! _�r �Jv' � '� _I �� t;'j +_ T`� "! _ �� S � ?.�� o: f � S i �� i/ r��`� �� v- � } f � �1��r �. 1 �,. C. 4 { i + �y� . � � � �, � � " k � �i 1 �t � :� s ; .�.' +? 1 �f �Y� +r � r ;.k� � i �.,+ { � ��,°{ ..e e _ � ' _.i Y �' ,, �� a G� 9 � ��'� - � � �,� � , �.r �..: ��z � .. � J . � < < �5� ��1 � � t � .x e � �. ,�a SR p�.N , �.� a � i .�. fi � � � �t;�; 1�n �'�� ' ir �, f �� i ¢ � �-^ > > ' x ) �' �,< � � .. yr.y �, � � F .� ..-� ' � : F '.ri� `� t .t y�x }��,a.l ( { i f 3'.�; � ' �s '�'� �: � F � � i � 1 ��.�� n�� r 1 13 t r� s 1' j t,i ' �� (kv✓ � t � �{•!p n k: � � � '� � � 4 � � r }�� r: r � 3 f` � � , c � 2 , l � �, ,� ..1 J � . � 1 ~ � . a .� � � � ft - � � -,; �� i � ,� ` �y i ��y ` > _: � . 1 s.:, r 1�. � �� P i i � ;# i �� y , y ��r �. � # .. t ' � ��•� �'C� *��E .� � Y �� ,� ? � . � ,�k.� +.�p �;� jY •" � i . �-. � \ � . �a� E .y ��.; .'� ti� �� ) � +,�i �� " ° r�� %} � �� , 1.,��, a ` r . ,,� ��,S� , . : ? �`' �.l , � fi- '� p� r �,'' ;�. �r. fa S �; . �r 1 -, t� � E �'v �� . t ,.. ._ z �s . ` :. � � t �� r � i" : � ! f I r Y_ a � � �, t �i��•�� t� d:Ea ��j . �.�< � �.i � y 3' 1.".'� )r ��! f l � Z � � �� ., �1J � :�� , � . y .i S k� . � .' � ` �' t � '�-:" � ,i `., .'� a : �� tl� ( � ('�� .�• � �I : r, P� ..;�t� !��\ / �� '�t `l�j�. �r � i _ �q� t �.�' �' i � i: �a i: � �: 4 rj . � � �' � � } � � � � . p �t � � t � �. � ��y�o�� ti � �. , � r ,�; x N � �� a � �� ?J F 'ld �.r .� . � t �'b° '�� ti V .�.' .l4 � ` '. .r' . �P l � i P ^y�j j K{ F�.. � .� A � �� i 'r l � , k. � 7 -�rF '� � '��i � �,i) ��v. � � �c �r��. y� t ` .�. �.< � � f k .�� '.�✓ w � ��. � = S 4 s v^ #K:'• " t i k � � e r � r � t �� ; ° �pc_ '�- ,�� r 1 � r r a�" r^ �, v . : �� . . � � ' � '','' :t�'� � - .� f � t_ � �� t i°,� G�r � � . � . �k�r :� �y ry .•,� k "-S � r f . � � 3 .�a� t � � � �"ti� i " '� � a a 1 ��- r, j�'. �� r � �1 �f � >> '� � �� ff � f e r�'� � }{m` � �� `��,� � - f �� U � . ; , 1� ti t � ', � �... ��I f , }- �l 1 S &k»;.�, i�� ; < .�F � < '4z'��I7 �'� �� ' .".t �� r� .�R( ��'J . a�� f -� ` �� .��:� �i y ! ,� i Y! .: f x � 1' �� '�.;r;i� . i _. .� .�-. 3 i _r...�.. _... 'i 4. _ . , �w.,5, ._ ., � �.� . . , . . , ._ ^�i . �..,. _�. ,.. _.:.,.b .� ti . .�k�e ._ � +e.t�,Y_ .,,�_..� t., . � ��-� �r� :;�°""""'�° CITY OF SAINT PAUL `'*' °�:�--, -" •'' OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 'e ,; ;� �n �s ;+. �� °� ALBERT B. OLSON, CITY CLERK �0°��„m��'��''�� 386 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4231 MAYOR September 23, 1988 , � � � �� `_;� Mr. Ed Starr City Attorney Room 647, City Hall Dear Sir: After public hearing on September 22, 1988, the City Council denied the appeal of Sarah Rubinstein to a decision of the Planning Com�nission which approved a site plan for the Arundel Street parking lot located on the south side of Selby at Arundel. Will you please prepare the proper resolution implementing this action. truly ours, , , ; _ ` A t B. Olson City Clerk ABO:th , , �;.'� _.�, .� , „ , � :� �4 CiTY �F� • � �. CITY OF SAINT PAUL k y � ��;�,,,�, ; DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT `�� ,�o DIVISION OF PLANNING 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 �sa• 612-228-3270 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR RECEIVED ; :;`; „ ;, September 15, 1988 �EP 16 1988 Albert Olson, City Clerk CITY CLERK Room 386 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File 10384 Appeal of Site Plan for Arundel Street Parking Lot (South side of Selby at Arundel) City Council Hearing: September 22. 1988 PURPOSE: To consider an appeal of a decision by the Planning Commission to approve with conditions the site plan for the expansion of the Arundel Street parking lot. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Approve with conditions (15-3) August 26, 1988 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMITTEE DECISION: Approve with conditions August 24, 1988 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve with conditions Dear Sir: On August 26, 1988, the Planning Commission approved with conditions the site plan for the Arundel Street parking. An appeal was filed by Sarah Rubinstein on September 8. The appeal is based on the fact that the public hearing notices listed the wrong location for the hearing. (The notices said that the meeting would be in the Council Chambers rather than on the 13th floor of the City Hall Annex.) The appeal is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on September 22, 1988. Please contact me by September 21 if any Council member would like slides presented at the public hearing. I have attached information on situation involving the hearing notices and also an update on revisions to the plan based on conditions previously attached by the Planning Commission and City Council. Sincerely, l�.�!�t� Tom Beach Zoning Section DATE : 9/15/88 T0 : City Concil FROM: Tom Beach , Zoning Section� RE : Problems with public notices for the Planning Commission hearing on the Arundel Street site plan The appeal of the decision by the Planning Commission to approve the Arundel Street parking lot is based on the fact that the hearing notices gave the wrong location for the meeting . The notices which should have told people to go to the 13th floor of the City Hall Annex instead told them to go to the City Council Chambers . This situation is covered by the Municipal Planning Act of Min- nesota. It states that "failure to give mailed notice to in- ividual property owners , or defects in the notice shall not in- validate the proceedings . �rovided a bona fide attempt to com�ly with this subdivision has been made . " (Section 462 . 357 Subd 3) In this case , Planning staff did not realize that a mistake had been made until the Planning Commission meeting was under way. As soon as we learned about it we sent someone down to the Coun- cil Chambers to tell anyone who showed up there where the meeting was . Planning staff has not received any calls or letters from in- dividuals saying that they were unable to attend the meeting. The individual who filed the appeal was eventually able to attend the meeting after checking in the Mayor' s office . Planning staff regrets that this mistake was made and caused some people inconvenience . However , the provisions of the Municipal Planning Act are quite specific in dealing with this situation, and staff recommends that the Council deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. � M�u�.s�-r�TL = �'��" / �'�',� � � �l��d-�1�lNC� ��t" `:�_ � 16:35?HOl:S1�G.RFDF�'ELOP�tE1T,PU!�tiI!�G.ZO\I�G 8092 ,� and subsurface areas o!the municipality into districts or zones of suitable numbers, shapc and area. The rcgulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings. structures or land and for each class or kind of use throughout such district. but the regulations in one district may differ from those in other districts. The ordinance embodying thae regulations shall be known as the zoning ordinance and shall consist of text and maps. A city may by ordinancc extend the a.pplication of its zoning � regutations to unincorporated territory located within two miles of iu limits in any . direction,but not in a county or town which has adopted zoning regulations;provided that where two or morc noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each is authorizcd to control the zoning of land on its sidc of a line equidistant between the two noncontiguous municipaliucs unless a town or county in thc affected area has adopted zoning regulations. Any city may thereafter enforce such regulations in the area to the same extent as if such property were situated within its corporate limiu, until the count}• or town board adopts a comprehensive zoning regulation which includes the area. Subd. 2. General requirements. At an}•time afier the adoption of a land use plan for the municipality,the planning agency, for the purpose of cam•ing out the policies and goals of thc land use plan, may prepare a proposed zoning ordinance and submit it to the governing body with its recommendations tor adoption. Subject to the requirements of subdivisions 3, 4 and 3, the governing body ma}•adopt and amend a Zoning ordinance by a two-thirds vote of aIl its members. If the comprehensi�e municipal plan is in conQict with the zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance super- sedes the ptan. Subd. 3. Public hearings. No zoning ordinance or amendment thereto shall be � adopted until a public hearing has been held thereon by the planning agency or by the governing body. A notice of the time, place and purposc oC the h�aring shall bc 3 published in the official newspaper of the municipality at least ten days prior to the day � of tht hearing. When an amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less,a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten days before the day of thc hearing to each owner of afFected .property and propeny situated whoily or panly within 350 feet of the property to which the amendment rdates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice. the person responsible for maiIing the notice may use any appropriate rccords to determinc the names and addresses of owners. A copy of the noticc and a tist of the ownen and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to bv the responsibtc person and shal] be made a part ot the records of thc proceedings. The faii re to give mailed notice to indiv��»ai��y owners or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the roccedin v' ed a bona 5de attem r to c m is divis� n as ade. Subd. 4. Amendments. An amendment to a zoning ordinance may be initiated by the governing body,thc planning agcncp,or by petition of aRected propeny owners as defin�d in the zoning ordinance. An amendment not initiated by the planning agency shall bc referred lo the planning agency,if there is one,for study and repon and may not be acted upon by the governing body until it has received the recommendation of the planning agency on ihe proposed amendment or until 60 days have elapsed lrom th�date of reference of the amendment without a repon by the planning agcnry. Subd. S. Amendmen� certain cities of the fint class. The pro�isions of this subdivision apply to cities of the first ctass. In such cities amendmenu to a zoning ordinance shalt be made in conformance with this scaion but only after there shall have been filed in the office of the city clerk a written consent of the owners of two-thirds of thc several dcscriptions of real utate situate within 100 feet of the total contiguous dcscriptions of real estate held by the same owncr or any pany purchasing any such . cnniiguous propeny within one ycar preceding the request, and after the affirmative vote in favor thereof by a majority of the memben of the governing body of any such — city. The governing body of such citv may,by a two-ihirds vote of its members,after / hearing, adopt a ncw zoning ordinance without such written consent whenever thc tplanning commission or planning board of such eity shall have made a survey of the � �. REVISIONS TO THE ARUNDEL STREET PARKING IAT 9/15/88 Six conditions were attached to the approval of the lot by the Planning Commission and the City Council. The current plan meets all of these conditions. The Planning Commission attached four conditions on their approval of the site plan. l. The Public Works Sewer Division must give fin81 approval of the stormwater management plan. The stormwater management plan has been approved by Public Works. 2. The developer must grant an easement to the St. PauZ Water Department for a relocated water main. It now appears that the water main will not be relocated so a new easement is not be needed. 3. The developer must work with the City Forester to save and transplant as many trees as possible. A large tree spade will be used to move the existing trees along Arundel to the new planting islands in the center of the parking lot. The existing trees along Arundel are approximately 6" in diameter. Trees of this size can successfully be transplanted although the drought of this summer may reduce their chance for survival. 4. Pedestrisn access must be improved between the Zot and the Se1by sidewaZks along the sides of the Arundel 1ot entrance or near the entrance. Connections between the lot and the Selby sidewalk have been added to the plan. The City Council added two conditions that the developer make good faith efforts at the following: 5. The planting islands in the center of the lot should be moved so that trees pZanted in them wi11 be more in line with the existing boulevard trees on Arundel. The planting islands have been moved out. In order to keep the same number of parking spaces, a row of cars will be parked on the inside of the islands along the main north-south drive lane. 6. Historic style Zight fixtures should be used throughout the 1ot. Two modern "shoe box" fixtures shown on the earlier plan have been replaced with four of the historic style fixtures. Two "shoe box" fixtures will be used at the back of the lot since they will not shine into the properties across the alley like the historic style fixtures would if they were place�here. � � �� '/�� APPLICATION FOR APPEAL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF SAINT PAUL RECEIVED File # ► 03 � _ � Application Fee � �� o� SEP 81988 Tentative Hearing Date y` Z �-' $g ZONING App 1 i cat i on i s hereby made for an Appea 1 to the � �'ry �o�l n _i � under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section (s�} , Par graph �� of the oning Code to appeal a decision made by the Board o��ning Appeals � Planning Commission on , 198�� _ Zoning Administrator (date of ecision) _ Planning Administrator Other A. APPELLANT Name Sa.ro`I1 IZ�• J��►nsfp c ►� Daytime phone �a '7 � �yS � Address �a.��f'flr� Zip Code S�/a �.., B. DECISION BEING APPEA ED Zon i ng f i 1 e name �-r�,�.�.e� ��,r-�t_t� �o`� Zon i ng Fi 1 e # f S"'�1'� Property Address/Location �rc,�,nde.� a— S�� b�l Legal description C. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Use additional sheets if necessary. ) (Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative official, or an error in fact, procedure or finding made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Planning Comnission.) s-�� t�� I�� ett�r- If you have any questions, please contact: /��-��-�� Applicant's signature St. Paul Zoning Office 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street �� 8�� Gt.�.1�.�SQ Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102 Date City agent T (298-4154) 9/82 442 Dayton St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 September 7, 1988 Zoning Committee 25 West Fourth St. St. Paul, Minnesota Re: Zoning File No. 1595 Zoning File Name--Arundel Parking Lot I wish to appeal the decisions of the St. Paul Planning Commission hearing of August 26, 1988. All property owners within 350 feet of the property under discussion were not properly notified of the time, date, and location of the hearing. The notice mailed to property owners contained the right time (10:00 A.M.) and date (August 16, 1988) , but the wrong location. The location was listed as City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall, St. Paul; the actual hearing was on the 13th floor of the City Hall Annex. This lapse is in direct contravention of hearing regulations. I found the hearing because I asked for help in the mayor's office. Jean, the mayor's secretary, made several phone calls and finally determined that I should go the the llth floor of the City Hall Annex. The staff there said there was an error in the notice and sent me to the 13th floor where I found the hearing already in progress. When city planning staff became aware of the error, they attempted a patchwork remedy of sending someone over to the City Council Chamber to see if anyone was there; no one was. When I spoke at the hearing I said that I felt that it was an invalid public hearing because there was improper notice given to the property holders. I asked that the matter be tabled until proper notice could be given. It was not. The regulation regarding notification has not been applied equally to all citizens; business owners and city staff received an accurate notice and homeowners did not. Homeowners were therefore denied free access to the hearing process. Because property owners were not properly notified of the hearing, I ask that the minutes of the hearing be erased, the motion to approve the site plan be set aside, and a new hearing be scheduled. Sincerely, ,,��- � , Sarah (Sally) Rubinstein ��V�� city of �aint paul P��9 �r�ssion reso�tion fde number 88-60 C�te AuQUSt 26. �9ss WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the Saint Paul Port Authority have submitted a site plan to the Planning Commission for review which calls for creating 45 new parking spaces by combining two existing parking lots at Selby and Arundel by utilizing the vacated Arundel Street right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the commercial area at Selby and Western has undergone a revitalization during the 1980's. Building on the earlier success of the Dakotah Building, three new major developments have been done in the area. On the southwest corner of Selby and Western, the old Angus Hotel building has been restored as Blair House with retail space, restaurants and condominiums. Immediately to the west is Hill Plaza, a new building with commercial space and condominiums. On the northwest corner is Cathedral Hill, a mix of existing buildings and new construction, with a variety of retail, offices and restaurants; and WHEREAS, this redevelopment has caused an increase in off-street parking required for the new uses. Parking demand for the projected uses has been determined to be about 270 spaces under the requirements of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the developers, the neighborhood and City staff have been working to find the needed parking: June, 1984 - Virginia was vacated between Dayton and Selby to provide additional parking. Initially a parking ramp was proposed for this location but a ramp proved to be financially unworkable. February, 1987 - The HRA reached an agreement with the developers to provide 225 parking spaces for the projects and make a good faith effort to find an additional 45 spaces. The HRA, which will front end the cost of developing the 270 spaces, will be paid back by the developers. September, 1987 - With the ramp on Virginia Street no longer a realistic option in the near future, the City Council approved a rezoning to P-1 to permit the expansion of the existing Virginia Street parking lot. This brought the total number of parking spaces provided under the HRA agreement to 225. (7-0) (continued) moved by ZIEMAN �7G��a' MGd �/ A1�FANG .r.� in fav�or- . against 3 File #1595SPR Page Two December, 1987 - A District 8 Task Force reviewed a number of alternatives for providing additional parking and recommended the Arundel Street location. (However, the full District 8 Council did not support the task force recommendation.) April 14, 1988 - The Heritage Preservation Commission recommended that vacation of Arundel Street be denied. (4-0-1) July 7, 1988 - The City Council approved the vacation of Arundel Street for the purpose of expanding the existing parking lots. (7-0) July 14, 1988 - The Heritage Preservation Commission denied site plan for Arundel Street parking lot. (7-1) August 30, 1988 - The City Council is scheduled to hear the appeal of the Heritage Preservation Commission's denial of the Arundel Street site plan; and WHEREAS, the site plan for the Arundel Street parking lot provides 45 new parking spaces and would meet the HRA's obligations under the 1987 parking agreement. The plan calls for using the vacated Arundel Street right-of-way and reorganizing the spaces in the existing parking lots so the space is used more efficiently; and WHEREAS, section 62.103 of the Zoning Code says that in order to approve a site plan the Planning Commission must find that it is consistent with the following: a. The City's adopted Comprehensive PZan and development plans for sub-areas of the City. Since 1982, the St. Paul HRA and Port Authority have been actively involved in attempting to restore the historic Selby and Western commercial area. Approximately $20 million has been invested in the area so far. Despite the successful renovation, parking remains a need for the area. When Cathedral (continued) , �d�� i� �� File #1595SPR Page Three Hill and Blair House were built before the turn of the century, parking was not a consideration. Today, however, parking is absolutely necessary to attract commercial tenants and to comply with City zoning requirements. b, Applicable ordinances of the City of Saint Paul. The proposed parking lot meets all applicable ordinances. Parking lot are permitted in the B-2 zoning district. The site plan meets all zoning requirements for setbacks, landscaping and layout. c. Preservation of unique geological, geographic or historically significant characteristics of the city and environmentally sensitive areas. When the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed this plan they were concerned about losing the historic grid pattern of the area streets. Planning staff shares this concern but feel that the plan has a number of design features to make it compatible with the historic character of the area: - The plan calls for a 4' wrought iron fence, a formal hedge and 13 shade trees along Selby Avenue. The lot would be setback 7' from the sidewalk. (The current lot has no fence and the plantings along Selby are low junipers which do not screen the lot. There are 8 shade trees now along Selby. The current setback for the lots are 6' and 10' .) - Nine shade trees would be planted in landscaped islands in the lot, including 7 trees in the vacated Arundel right-of-way. (There are currently 7 shade trees in the lot, including 5 in the Arundel right-of- way. These trees would be removed. None of the trees to be removed are mature trees. ) (continued) File #1595SPR Page Four - The new driveway to the parking lot would be in located in the vacated right-of-way for Arundel Street to strengthen the continuity of Arundel Street. Z�ao existing curb cuts would be closed. - The old fashioned street lights on Arundel would be saved and used in the proposed parking lot. The vacation of Arundel Street has a reversion clause which says that the street will be reopened if enough parking is found elsewhere for the developments so that the 45 spaces created are no longer needed. There is also a "sunset" clause attached to the vacaton: the City Council must review the situation by 3/15/90 and if no action is taken the vacation would expire on 5/31/90. d. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for such matter as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air, and those aspects of design which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. The parking lot would meets these requirements. The lot was changed to meet earlier concerns about access for emergency vehicles and snow storage. e. Creation of energy-conserving design through landscaping and Zocation, orientation and elevation of structures. Shade trees in and around the lot will provide cooling shade in the summer. f. Safety and convenience of both vehicular and pedestrian traffic both within the site and in relation to access streets, including traffic circulation features, the locations and design of entrances and parking aress within the site. (continued) . ��'� -- i� ��` �' File #1595SPR Page Five The plan Traffic Engineering Section of Public Works has reviewed the site plan and determined that it meets these requirements. The lot will have a single driveway on Selby which will be adequate to handle anticipated traffic. The internal layout and dimensions of the lot meet the requirements. g. The satisfactory avsilebility and capacity of storm and sanitary sewers, including solutions to any drafnage problems in the area of development. The sewer plan has been reviewed by the Sewer Section of Public Works. As this report is being written, the plan is acceptable but some final technical details remain to be resolved before final approval is given. The plan would not create problems if in the future Arundel Street was reopened. h. Sufficient Zandscaping, fences, wa11s and parking necessary to meet the above objectives. The landscaping and screening of the lot along Selby will be improved as described in finding c. Landscaping at the rear of the lot will also be increased to better screen it from the property across the alley: 31 Amur Maple will be added to the existing 12 resulting in a spacing of 8' apart. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission approves the site plan for expansion of the existing parking lots at Selby and Arundel subject to the following conditions: l. That the Public Works Sewer Division grants final approval of the stormwater management plan; 2. That the developer grant an easement to the St. Paul Water Department for the relocated water main; 3. That the developer work with the City Forester to save and transplant as many of the trees as possible; and 4. That pedestrian access be improved between the lot and the Selby sidewalks along the sides of the Arundel lot entrance or near the entrance. » > �f,�� I��, < > m - — J -- - --- —- y -- - -- o -- o o • � o -_ __ • I � � / ` t l , N / t.. • I ( � --- t� _ � . `� ---— � t • �- — � � • � ' t, ; � � I �— � i i ; i � i { - _...__ � ; 1 � i ' o � i � ' i < i -- � m i I � � ' ° � �----- i— _ - _ � j , ---- I -- � I 1 I � W <� i � --- J I J C1 I � �i ' A • t; � F -- _ o � ��— � _, - � , _ �- , m � <� ' • ~ -__- �—�- _' l a �� < a �rUhc�e ( � � �, / ` -- ` � m ' LL . �. . C � " -- --- < _ �� --- � � i , - --s A I I O p o i I � � � � I ol � / ' � o , « � � ��, _-_.� . . N I � O i � I --1--- • � � y� , _.__-__- . J I � .— o w , � � �-- �, tJ ' ' - ' i s.' -- __-- ° I --� � '; - • � �-�' � - — � < � �__ _ - � � _ __ � � __ - - _ _ __ _ ° ; : .�.... �' � — -- _-- . ��-f��9 ._---- _ __ _ _ lnve x ,�o ui� �>r � .. . . ... ._ , ea��i/6 ��1�4 � . . . . . . . � ��N�H� 4�arv�lslN�i� dl� aMalsi �Ivl.uv�na : ,!-01 �IN hl� '1�Q(v(l�'�/��'I��i � _� � _ . ._._ _..... � - ,� � .. � � � � � r u � � � - - - � -'� -+� � `� � . �. � � � ; � � , � � ; � � -� � s I � � � ` A i �z � o � � s � � � � � ~� � }- �— � v � � I i � � � � � , � � ' � �� s � � � i ! � �� I � �� 7 � v , � ( �-� � � � s -u` � � � o� �7 - o- .c l� _ N i �� o - � �. � -� - �� CL � � � U � � i � ' A � , � � � � . � � � � � ._.. �� , 2 'j 9 ' � � `� ' I � t � j ° 3 ° 'J-y �I�4Nn� , � S N r < � a os o , 0 0��9 � � °- �9 °'� 3`? �� , � , � � � I �N y1 N � � V V � T �'�' � L �� ' �' � � _ � = � � � t � � � L u.� � � �, � � � � ' . ,sj __'—_____ ____ , � � \ .�! \ � \ �• ' / r , — „ _ ,, -- a �� ,- � , � � y' _ � �, a '_ � ` --} �--� �• � -- >• ,- � , �,--� � , . � �, L 9 1� I O I /� `\� 1 � � Y M�T' — 1 � ' / � 1 �� / ! �� 1 1 � '� �� i �- ' ', � 1 j j 1� .` � � � �4� ; ,�� __-�1 � + ' a� - � � — �� i =1 � ; � �` I its Ii ' . , � � , � • � � s, � i"; i �� xy — - —, — � �� I .ds�� -- �' � '� � �� .•,/ � � P� � �I� : , '— - i i � ; i >� � \ � -�— � � , 4 � — � , � � i__ { 1 , �� a 1 � ; � .� i--� �__ � � a � � �� 1 � 1 � �� ' � �� r � � � � / ��c-- � i ° i � I � 9� _ __— � l _ � l- -- i . g � j L � I�� . f � —, -r.----- - , s , , r:=_=------ . . ��- f� �� SSLBY-ARUNDEL PARKING LOT PRBLIMINARY COST BSTIMATB PRBPARBD BY: SANDERS AND ASSOCIATBS, INC. JITLY 12, 1988 ITBM UNIT QTY UNIT PRICB TOTAL -------------------------------------------------------------------- RBMOVALS LS 1 $10, 000.00 �10,000.00 $XCAVATION AND GRADING LS 1 �18, 000.00 s18, 000.00 ASPHALT , SF 30396 �0. 75 �22, 797.00 AGGRSGATS BASB CY 563 �10. 00 �5, 630.00 CONCRBTB CURB I.F 1228 $6. 00 $?, 368. 00 CONCRBTB WALK SF 900 �2. 25 �2, 025. 00 STORM SBWBR I.S 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 N8W LIGHT STANDARDS BA 4 �2, 500.00 s10,000.00 R$LOCATB $XISTING LIGHT STDS. BA 4 $1,600. 00 $6,400.00 HNOCR DOWN POSTS BA 4 $625.00 �2,500.00 STATIONARY BOLLARDS BA 10 $350.00 $3,500. 00 GRASSCRBTS SF 336 �5.00 �1,680. 00 MBTAL FBNCB LF 2�0 $60.00 ;15,000. 00 WATBR MAIN & HYDRANT LS 1 �23, 000. 00 $23,000.00 IRRIGATION SYSTgM LS 1 $3, 000.00 $3,000. 00 LANDSCAPING LS 1 $21 , 100. 00 $21, 100 . 00 PARRING LOT STRIPING LS 1 $500. 00 a300. 00 MOBILIZATION �7,000. 00 SUBTOTAL $163, 000. 00 1�� CONTINGBNCY $24, 450. 00 '�� TOTAL $187,450. 00 ' 7. � � , ��f CITY OF S/11NT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAI MEMORANDUM T0: A1 Coulter Saint Paul Water Utility FROM: James Zdon � _ ^ DATE: August 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Vacated Arundel Street I am responding to Tom Mogren's August 22, 1988 memo to Ken Johnson on the vacated Arundel Street HRA parking lot. We accept your suggestion to offset the water main around the proposed islands. We will be going to the HRA board on September 7, 1988 requesting the 10 foot easement that you identified. Our plans are to start construction on this parking lot in October of this year. Obvioixsly, we still need to coordinate our activities and I will be having our architect and engineering staff from PED contacting you shortly. Thank you for your help on this matter. Please call me at 3324 if you have any further questions. JZ:jr . cc: Gloria Bostrom Darold McMahon Larry Zangs �. . i•ry+`� ��_ �� ;,�i CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM T0: A1 Coulter Saint Paul Water Utility FROM: James Zdon � _ � DATE: August 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Vacated Arundel Street I am responding to Tom Mogren's August 22, 1988 memo to Ken Johnson on the vacated Arundel Street HRA parking lot. We accept your suggestion to offset the water main around the proposed islands. We will be going to the HRA board on September 7, 1988 requesting the 10 foot easement that you identified. Our plans are to start construction on this parking lot in October of this year. Obviously, we still need to coordinate our activities and I will be having our architect and engineering staff from PED contacting you shortly. Thank you for your help on this matter. Please call me at 3324 if you have any further questions. JZ:jr cc: Gloria Bostrom Darold McMahon Larry Zangs • �� • • • � ' � , � . • • � • ' • • • � . ' • • . � � ' � A • � • � • • • � � � �A � � r � � � � y r � � ! � �� A � � r�� D . . . . �� , � _ � o a 0�� u �, v 0 �3� . �1� . . ;� �o; oap r � � � � • � - �� / / /. / � /: ______� . . • � . , , , • sti 0�� • • • • r � • • • � � � � � . • ► �� • • • • • • • • • � • • � � � � � L� � � • • • • • • • • • � � � • � • • � � � � ' ' � 0 . . � • � . • • � � • • • � . . �,, • �� = . � � � . � • • � • � • • � « � � � • � • \ \ �. • • � • w � • • , � � • � • � \ • r . . . . . a • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � '• ' � �� --0� , . . . y' . � � � PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SAtNT PAUL PLANNIN6 COMMISSION , jQ Property Owners within 350 feet; Repcesentatives of Planning District 8 APPUCANT SAINT PAUL HRA ANO PORT AUTHORITY Site Plan Review for Arundel Street parking lot. The plan PURPOSE would use the vacated Arundel Street right-of-way to combine the two existing lots, adding 45 new parking spaces. LOCATlON OF PROPERTY south side of Sel by Avenue at Arundel between Hi11 Plaza and St. Paul Curling Club h I TIME Of HEARIN6 Friday, August 26, 1988 10:00 A.M. . PLACE Of HEARIH6 City Coupcil Chambers, 3rd Floo; City Ha11�St.Pau1 � I�OW TO PARTICIPATE 1• Yau may attendFhearing and testify - i 2. You may send a le[ter before the hearing to the ! Zoning Cc,mmittee, 25 West Fou;th Street, � ' St.Pau.l, Mn. 55102. I ANY QUESTIONS Call the Zoning office at 298-4154 (Tom Beach) ' or call your distr�ct council representative (_ 228-1855 ) i wi:th the �ollowing informat�on; Zoning File Na. 1595 Zoning File Name ARUNDEL PARKING LOT *1ailing Date 8�16/88 . . . � �� - ��i y . ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL PUe�IC HEARING NOTICE Z O N I N G �ECEIVED S E P 141988 CITY CLERK T0: Property owners within 350' ; FI L E N 0. 10384 Representati ves of P1 anni ng Di stri ct 8 PAGE RURPOSE This is an appeal of a decision by the Planning Commission � to approve the site plan for the Arundel Street parking lot: I.00ATION South side of Selby at Arundel PETITIONER - SARAH RUBIP;STEIN HEARING Thursday, September 22 , 1988 9:�� A,*�, • Citv Council Chambers, 3rd Floor Citv Hall - Court House QUESTIONS Zoning 298-4154 (Tom Beach) Contact the Zoaing Section of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102 Legal Descr' ption: On fi�e Notice sent 9/9/88 .