88-1560 WHITE - C�TV CLERK
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAUL
CANAqV - OEPARTMENT COUflCll
BIUE -MAYOR L+11e NO. �_��D
C 1 /l
- � •
0/ N�Z nce O dinance 1�)�. Q
sented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council , having been conducted on
February 18, 1988 and April 28, 1988 where all interested persons were heard,
and the Council having considered all the facts and recomnendations concerning
the petition; now, therefore,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1.
That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul , Sheet No. 13, as
incorporated by reference in Section 60.301 of the Saint Paul
Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows:
That property located at 561 Whitall being more particularly described
as Lot 4, Block 1, Edmund Rice lst Addition be and is hereby rezoned
from RM-2 to B-2.
Section 2.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from
and after its passage, approval and publication.
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas ��� Nays
_o�- , �ij Planning d Economic Deve ment
[n Favor
Rettman
s�n.�bei � Against BY �
Sonnen
�—�oN'�
w�iso�
Adopted by Council: Date VCI 13 1988 Form Appro d y City Attor
Certified Pas e unci Se t BY
�
By _ �
Appro by Mayor: Date r�T 1 8 �� Approve y Ma r Sub ' sion to Council
�
Y _ (�T
��3i9� O li 1 �� �'' �.=._----
� �cS — ���6
� \
a, �a
�
�
� L
rn � .
�
�
a
w �
• o
va,i o
� w
� �
� �
.,�
� � z
� _
� � o
� c.'
� �
O R1 N
z � � ; m
u M
c �
0 �/�
.r 0 �i/
+, Q � !
•r v � I
i � r^
V � W
N
d a �
�..,
� o
a� �
E u,
� �
s. �
� � � M
~ � Ei dN'
O
�
N
J (Y.,
�
a c
d. J �
.a 1. Gl
]G F- 2 �' -�
� cn s a. E
w � v �
� u. F'— � +-� � Z
UO � = r6 N
>- r z +� . �
c o
� ~ � ___.___._.___ ___� c� �
CJ U M i !
. . '
_ . DC�C�', ; � � �
t'''� � �� F'� ��
�,. '�`r:�E, � � i
� L . ... ���� ��
�� �
c�''� t��� �j II c� ��y � �
w� ��
� �
r� co�;,, , .
- B Y���� ,�.�
r�
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
County of Ramsey ) ss.
CITY OF SAINT PAUL )
I . . . . Albert. B.. Olson. . ...... . ... . . . .. . . .
, .City Clerk o€ the
City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
88-1560
compared the attached copy of Council File No. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .
as adopted by the City Council. .. . . ,�tober.l3: . . . . . . . . , ,19 88. . .
October 18,
and approwed by the Mayor. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .... . . . . .. .. 19... .. .
with the original thereof on file in my office.
I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy
of said original and the whole thereof.
WITNES� my hand and the seal of tne City of Saint Paul,
Minnesota this . . . , 18th. . . _„ day of ., ,November. . . , . ,,A.D. 19 88 .
. . . . . . . L.�.���?r�. . � ��:-;:`.d`r/ . . . . . . . ..
_ _' City Clerk. ,�i
. ,
��i�" �-- . ._ •��. �. /�
. 1 �
_ - i G�
/J �,� �_Q�r p �
/`S�� �3 �, �,(� �Ct�-�'"� ._._...�,"_ ._:,,._..rt__....� ,�.-� . ���;..-:�::
- r
WHITE - G17V CLERK COLL[1C1� �
PINK - FIN�CNCE
CANARV - OEVARTMENT G I TY 'OF SA I NT PA U L
olUE -MAVOR File N0. � �D
. O��iZ n`, Ordinance N�. -.����
Presented By � � �� \
� �
Re#erred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code
C''� pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning maps
� thereof.
��
� WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, § 462.357 and § 64.400 of the
� Legislative Code, James Laughlin duly petitioned to rezone 561 Whitall Street
� located on the north side between Jessie and Edgerton from RM-2 to I-1 for the
:�
purpose of operating a contractor's office; the petition having been
certified by the Planning Division on November 23, 1987 as having been
consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the area of the property
to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least 67% of the
owners of the property situated within 100 feet of the tota� contiguous
property within one year precedi�g the date of the petition; and
WHEREAS, The Zoning Committee on January 7, 1988 conducted a public hearing
for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to Section
107.03 of the Administrative Code, submitted its recommendation to the
Planning Commission that the petition be denied; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its _
meeting held on January 15, 1988 and recommended that the City Council deny
the petition; and
WHEREAS, Notices of a public hearing before the City Council on the said
petition were duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property
situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property sought to be
rezoned; and
COUNCILMFN
Yeas Nays Requested by Department of: .
Drew
Niwsia in Favor
Rettman
Scheibel A gai n s t BY
Sonnsn
Tedesco
Wilaon �
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
By
Approved by Mayor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY
, �
WMITE - GITV CLERK
OINK - FIN�NCE G I'TY �O F SA I NT YA U L Council
CANARV - DEPARTMENT ��j�
BIUE -MAVOR File N O. -�✓�✓O
• • .
O/ wZ nCe O dinance N0. _����
Presented By
�
Referred To � Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, A public hearing before the City Council , having been conducted on
�February 18, 1988 and April 28, 1988 where all interested persons were heard,
C'� .and the Council having considered all the facts and recorr�nendations concerning
:� the petition; now, therefore,
��
�
�
�THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1.
That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul , Sheet No. 13, as
incorporated by reference in Section 60.301 of the Saint Paul
Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows:
That property located at 561 Whitall being more particularly described
as Lot 4, Block 1, Edmund Rice lst Addition be and is hereby rezoned
from RM-2 to B-2.
Section 2.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from
and after its passage, approval and publication.
COUNCILMEN
Yeas ��� Nays Requested by Department of: •
_w�. � Planning d Economic Deve ment
In Favor
Rettman
s�ne�b.i � Against BY
sonnen
�dese��^�d��
Wilson
���� � 3 198$ Form Approv d y City Attor
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Pas e unci Se t BY
�
sy _ _ . _ I
Appro by Mayor: Date Appr v y Ma r Sub ' sion to Council
♦
Y -
' �,�;,�s�'� �C T ". � 1.___—_-
�
• �`y�atr p� ' . ����po
;`.•' : � � �� � ' CITY OF AINT PAUL
� � . •
'� ��= DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEtiT
� 7� {_�� � " DIVISION OF PLAVtiItiG
�?' � 25 West Fourth SheN.Saint Pwl,Min�esota 55102
' ,••• �'' 612-22&32"0
GEORGE UTIMER �
MAYOR
�pril 28, 1988
Council President James Scheibel and
Kembers of the City Council
Seventh Floor City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
RE: Zoning File #10228 - James Laughlin
City Council Hearing: April 28, 1988
Dear President Scheibel and Council Members:
The applicant's initial request to rezone this parcel from RM-2 to I-1 was
reviewed by the Zoning Committee and Planning Commission. On January 7, 1988
the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
rezoning. The petitioner testified. At the close of the public hearing, the
Committee voted 6 to 1 to deny the rezoning based on staff report findings. On
January 15, 1988 the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's
re�ommendation 18 to 2.
Subsequently, the applicant has decided to� put a 176 square foot office on the
second floor of the structure with the remainder of the building being used for
storage of equipment and supplies. The of�ice will ser�e as a satellite off�ce
L"or his eiectrical contractor' s business. S�nce � cont�actor' s office �aith
,�r.door storage is first permitted in the 3-_ �onir.� dis�r�c�, the app��can� :s
asking the Council to consider rezonir.g �o B-? �^s�2ad of i-i.
The District 5 Planning Council has reviewed Kr. Laug�in's revised request a��
�:oted to support rezoning the parcel to B-� .
P�anr.ing staff evaluated this reques� ar.d has made the foliowing findings :
1. The applicant operates an elec�ricai business in 5t. Paul and inter.ds
to use this structure for a secondary office and indoor storage. A
contractor's office with indoor storage is first permitted in a B-2
zoning district.
�. The existing unfinished state of tne building poses a health and
safety threat to the immediate neighborhood.
� . . �. . �. � ���---��6�
File #10228 '
� Page 'hio
3. The parcel in question abuts residential uses to the north and west
� and industrial uses on the south and east. The topography of the area
forms a natural break between the existing residential and industrial
uses with the land to the south and east being considerably lower in
elevation than the parcel in question. To extend industrial uses into
the residential area is inappropriate.
4. The B-2 Community Business District is more restrictive than the I-1
district and the types of uses permitted the district are more
compatible with the adjacent residential uses.
5. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to
maintain and enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering
between incompatible land uses. Rezoning this parcel to B-2 would
allow a problem building to be improved and would buffer the
residential area from the more intense nonresidential uses.
6. If the rezoning is approved, the applicant m�st _request a zoning
s,.,��r
variance for setback requirements. In a B-2�,� structures must be set
back 10 feet from ad�oining residentially zoned lots. The structure
is setback 8 feet from the west property line and 3 feet from the
north property line. As well, the applicant must improve the site to
current city standards.
Based on the above staff findings, staff recommends approval of the rezoning
from RM-2 to B-2.
Sincerely,
�.p �ti[.�¢,�
Lisa J . Freese
Planner II
L;F:rm
Attachments
�����°
� ZONING COlQiITTEE STAFF REPORT
FILE #10228
1. APPLICANT: James F. Laughlin DATE OF HEARING: 1/07/88
2. CIASSIFICATION: Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1
3. LOCATION: 561 Whitall Street (North side between Jessie and Edgerton)
4. PIANNING DISTRICT: 5
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 1, Edaund Rice lst Addition
6. PRESENT ZONING: RM-2 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 64.400
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 12/17/87 BY: Lisa J. Freese
A. �Q�: To permit indoor storage for an electrical contractor business.
B. SUFFICIENCY: The petition was declared sufficient by the Planning Division on
November 23, 1987; 8 parcels eligible, b parcels required� 6 parcels signed.
C. LOT SIZE: The parcel is 132 feet in depth with a 44 foot frontage on Whitall
for a total lot area of approximately 5,800 square feet. �
- _ - _ _ -_ _ - - _ - �
D. EXISTING LAND USE: The garage-like structure on the property is currently �
vacant. The structure's last lrnown use was residential. An unfinished addition
in the rear was begun illegally in 1986.
E. SURROUNDING IAND USE:
North and West: Residential. RM-2
East and South: Industrial, I-1
F. ZONING HISTORY: Prior to 1975 the property was zoned for °light industrial."
G. FINDINGS:
1. According to property valuation records a 26' by 40' structure was noved onto
this lot in the late 1970's, but a moving permit was not issued. The property
is_taxed_as_commercial, but there is no record of its.use prior to 1983V From
• . ' .. „ ' ' ' • `/'/- CJ� ✓���V
. File �t10228
Page T�o
6. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to saintain and
enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering between incoapatible
land uses. S�hile the buffering between existing incompatible uses in this area
is not adequate. rezoning this property would not iaprove the situation. The
site is small and the building is not set back adequately from the property
line, so very little space between this property and th� adjacent properties is
available for buffering. In addition� one of the city•s industrial policy
strategies is to increase the co�ercial and industrial lead supply, but it
stipulates that such parcels should be sufficiently resoved from resfdentlal
land uses so as to not adversely affect them. Given the close proxisity of this
site to a residential area� rezoning it vould not oeet the intent of this
strategy. This rezoning application is not in conforaance with the
Coaprehensive Ylan.
H. �TAFF ANALYSIS: In the near future little potential exists for residential
development of the site. The existing structure is an eyesore, so rezoning and
the subsequent improvements planned by the applicant vould provide i�ediate
iaproveaent. In sddition. contractor storage is a reasonable use of the
existfng building. This requires a choice to be aade between isnediate
iQprovement of the site or long term goals for the area. Staff reco�ends
following the long term goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
I. STAFF RECOI�4�iENDATION; Based on staff findings 1 through 6, staff recommends
denial of the rezoning from RM-2 to I-1.
i
� ' ' i I
• • �,' ,
• � � �l
� a • � �
. . . � . _
.
. • • �
. . C. • � .
• • ��� . . . .
u,
.
c��� cv • � .n � . . . .
, � , � .
. � • � '
��rs c�. . , � � , ,, ,
. , , �i�"i
` . c�.i�s .
. . � �
. . . �n � � �
. � : � o� � ��
� � �� �� � i
t'� �'.�, / `,
' � el
• • • �� • • � • • �1 • � �
� � �i
i �i � • �
��� �' � �
� ° a �o -
o . v
.
.
� �� �
..
I� --- _
_� .
-- -�...�._ .
1 . —�— .^.�.��.. — �
: -..s�� '".M-� -- �'•.�i ,��
; : �- = �_
�� ■ �
i i i��� � /�--
ii �..��..�.�.�� ���
, - ��.� �
■ ��-_ - �� ��� ���'
� ��� �
■ / � �� •
t„ ;.:` , . . �a ����� Y �� ����
� � � � � �
; S�Q 1 a N°_ �113726 '�/
D$PARTMENT r7�a
����T � T :
PHONE
� DATE .
ASSIGN �UltBER FOR 80UTING.OBDER: (See reverse side.)
Department Director/P1 dR111 nq Adm1 ni St 3 �yor (or Assistant)
_ Finance aad Managea�ent Ssrvices Direct r � City Clerk
Budget Director � Council Research
� City Attorney _,
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATtJRE PAGES: 1 (Clip all locations for signature.)
WHl�T i�1ILL BE ACHIBVED B� TARIN6 ACTION ON THL ATTACHED MATERIALSY (PurposeJRationale)
;
Ardinance implements City Council action of 4/28/88.qrantinq a rezoning from RM-2
to B-2 for the -property Tocated a 561 4lhiteall Street. Rezonino°was reauested in
order to operate a contratorFs office in an existina building. .
C9STlBENEFIT. BIIDGETARY. AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPl4fiED: - • ---;;�,
REC�!i�ED
SEP 1 �� 1988
MA�(OR'S OFFICE
FINANCING SOURCE AND BUDGET_ AGTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED:
(Mayor•s signature not required if under $10.000.)
Total Amoutit of TransSction: Activity Number:
Fundiag 3ource:
� Councit Research Center
ATTACHMENTSi (List and number all attachments.) -
SEP 191988
1. Ordinance
2. Staff report
3. Map
ADI�IIN23TRATIVE PROCEDURES
_Yes _No Rules, Regulations, Procedures� or Budget Amendment required?
_Yes _No If yes, are they or timetable attached?
DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW
_Yes _No Council resolution xequired? Reso�ution required? _Yes _No
< . .: :�.
_Yes _No Insurance required?. - Insurance sufficient? _Xes �No
Yes No Insurance attached?
.' t ` i.
, �;TO OSE THE GREEN SHEE�: „ . '. ' ' �
. ,. ..V ,..;�r
.The GREBN SHEBT �ias. thrse ��s . , -
1. to •assis� ��,�ti� �cc�eats � �;'at�aring req���rad aigaatures;
2. to l�rief t�a tts�ria�ers of documents ,pt;.�►e impacts of approval;
3. tc► he.Ip enst�te that n�cessary suppo��tg mstarials are ptepsred and, if required,
° attached. .
; -
,
Providing complete information under the lis�sd: headings snal�lss revie�rers to mske
decisions on the documents and aliminates fo12�r-up contacta that, may delay eaecution.
Balox is the p�eferred �Qg�ING for the fiva �sst frequent ty�rs� of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes au;tlio�ited budget exist�)
1. Outsida Agency 4. �ayor
2. Initiating Department 5. Fittsnce Director
3. City Attorney 6. Finsttce Accounting
Note: If a �ONTRACT amount is less than .$1D,000, the Ziayor•s $ignature is not required,
if the department director signs. A con�ract must als�ays ba �igned by the outside agencq
before routin$ through City offices.
ADMINISTRA'�IVL� ORbE� (Bu�get Revision) . , ADM��tATIVE ORDER (all others)
1. Activity l�anager � � � �1 � In�.tiating Department �
2. DQpartment Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director . 3. Mayor/Assistant
4. Budget Director . 4. City Clerk
5. City Clerk � �
6. Chief Accountant, Financa a3td Maaagiaagt. Services ,
COUIdCIL RESOLUTI�N �Budgat Amendmeat/Grant Acc�ptan�e) �OONCIL RESOLtTTION (all others)
1. Department Dfrector 2. Dapartment Director
2. Budget Dir�ctor • 2. City At�orney
3. City Attorney 3. ,tsayor/Assistant
4. Mayor/Assistant 4. City Clerk
5. Chair, Finance, Mg�t. . aud Pers. Cte. 5. City Council
6. City Clerk
7. City Council
8. Chief Accouatant. Finsnce and lqanagsmant Saxvicas
The COST/BENFFI�. B"ODGETAIt�. At�D PS�SOL�NEL I�RAC� heading provid�s �pace to explain the
cost/benefit aspect� of the dacisiott. Cost�s and benefits.relate both to City budget
(General Fund and/or Special F�mds) and to brosd�r fiaancial impacts (cost to users,
homeowners, or.ot�er grQukps �sffected bq� the"a�tion). The per-sonnel-��.aepact is_a .description
of change or_shift of Full-Tfine Equivalent (FTE� positions.
The ADMINISTRATIVE PROC� section must be completed to indicate Mhether additional
administrative procedures, including rules, regulatians, or resource propos�als �are -
necessary �for implementation of an ordinance or resolution. If yes. the procedures or a
timetable for the completion of procedura� must be attached.
SUPPORTING M�iTERIALS. In the �TTACHMENTS sactton, identify all sttachments. If the Green
Sheet is �rell done, no lettsr of transmit�l nead be included (unle�s signing such a letter
is one of the requested actions).
Note: If an agreement requires evidence of insurance/co-insurance, a Certificate of .
Insurance should be one of the attachments at time of routing.
Note: Actions which require Citq Gouncil resolutions include contractual relationships
arith other governmental units; collective bargaining contracts; purchase, sale, or lease of
land; issuance of bonds by City; eminent domain; assumptfon of liability by City, or
granting by �City of indemnificatian; agreements with state ar.federal governraent under
which they are providing funding; budget amendments.
.�.
�t �7r .K c .rF y x c3 � . '"; t r� 3- �f'^ e�t�,� i� 4a ;+'ST x �x
' �� i r : i r �l � ' �, �� +� a $� 1 a ,/ ,3'-. ,� >�.�'� �., t _� � ' ��
`� s'� � - 1 ; ��� +'a
6` i�ty� � t yt��#r �� � F` �F �f � ;,� � ',t 2 �+ i 5 r �„M...�:� �'�.V�j,�.,'
, l:: !� / 1 {}1�� r�` y .� ::4 �
-' �. � a�'�. •,1., �r � „ o.., " � '
JY - � ,4�. '� t it 1 �� . �'�r"`.
_ ��— ' ��w� b ��
� Y �
� t _ t � l
� ..( �. J ,iY�
.� i . , :t� `{y"
�� � � `� l { '� ' ��r �
� � 1:� � '� � \ a l�r} �;
� - i:'
.
_ , i +��
� . � ��'��7�ii7�i .� { t: - .. ai � ��;;
` _� . . ..., _ i' '�i� + /_�
,�� � - ` _ ; ±
� r' � �i � ��y
. . _ . .
, , ,
.
, . . �. � .
/ � �� %
� � � e ' �Y `
'���y . ��:- �,�'. ,�iVfF, .' . .l S
� .�1 .�����i�t�..�.��.: ��- . f ` �
" I
��" .�'
. e � '
..
? ;
' �F ,`
/ �'��� � . ' �:
, �.
r: � ,
j . � � i
� . . .�.. a � i
. . .. . . �` '..
.
� � : . .., .. . .. . . . .. . . , � . .. � ..
, .
� �. ,�. ... . �.. . ... -.-:'. •
.:
:�: � . .." - .. .. '�..�. . "e ',
) .
, �,�� t�� � �� ����f �{� ��� �� ���, � j�
- ,� a e�os� �o '�►�r � p�r��#craE=��� ���I�� ��� �Y � �
�
� _�+rir� �..',(�fi�;l, � �.,�o ��'"� ��: ���'� �t.�:l�Ne;.�+�.
� �t�i.� �ea�i�,,�M�etiri�:�ie a►��tc�. , � r,
r � � � ' i �:
, , ,
; :
v� �� �� .
,� - .
; � , ::
/ �i ��* � � 4 , . }� .I�,- t ..
, .
r . � .
% ���, :�� ' �' � �, ! � �.
������- � .. z' ��� s
, , . .
_ �' ���
... , ,- . , , .
. �,:. _. .. ;�- , . ..
. : . ��. �.:. , �.. . , �� - �.;
: :..:� !�.. . r,'
}
' � .... ' . :� , .
y �-� '
, . ,�.. ,, �.. ; h/ .; . . .� ;. �- Y:
�
�f-�' ��. . 1 ' ' ,,, . ..� � . � ::^. ,. 1 t
e / w`} � F 1�p
.. ' � ';% �:.� 4 � 4*` .(1
— 1 �'
: , ,. ,. , _
, _ ,.
z
,.
.
, � ;_. , . �-. , �
,
,..
` � ,, • '?�
,: ��,, . ;� ;�r: -„
� '. �` ` „
. ,
_ . ��
. � � _
, � � .
l'
.
_ � �
r q
♦, ��
� � � r �
.. �_ . .' �� _ -
� ,. � , . '. . ... - ,.� ,,.
.
� ti¢;
� . \-'\. , �'h
. ., . � .. . ..
, . - , . ... Y _ . i t.
�_ . . > . � . �' 3, T
'� _ G,r
. .
�,,. . . .- - ' �:
. : . .
:. .. <, . : i . . . , . ' ��.
, . :-� -� . .,� :�� . . ., ..�. . �� . �' . . :. � . . . � .. , .,` . ,
'
. , , � .. � . . . .. .
. .'.. .;. :: ..
- . � .i - � ! .�. �.:; . �:��: .��� . � .�.'. � �. ` ).:- � _
� � tii
.W
. . � � �•�� . . ��� ��� i�� 1 �
, _
:. .
. '
, ,
� -. - - . .. � .i , \' - ��,
. � � ' P/ � ��'�
� ,. �.
. . , �� ,. :� ... . .: e :
. . , ` � . .. . . .: � . .�� . .,
� - . , . �,,. �. . ., . �� _ H
: '.
a , , ,
.r. . , � � �"�s
� .. . � � ' S:: F::
� � ... J '. � y� �� t
R
,. - ` ��,t . .- °a�:
.
' �' / � . ' i . '
i . .
;.. � - . �, -'�, f � ��
'. . . ' . .,. . . . ,
. . ..i.: �' -�. � . �.
1
�
� t;y
, ( U
i i � ,. . . ., ,. . .. , � . i .. � ! . , .. . � � . . . .._i J�.
`, ` � / �,�� � � � �r� �;�` /
R�y CtT! pP '+ � ���...6 ,♦±�± \�
�� CITY OF SAINT PAUL
a ��„�����„ � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
�m '��� �� � �v' DIVISION OF PLANNING
25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102
iss•
612-22&3270
GEORGE LATIMER
MAYOR
RECEIVED
February 8, 1988
FEB 16 1988
Albert Olson, City Clerk CITY CLERK
Room 386, City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
RE: Zoning File #10228 - James Laughlin
City Council Hearing: February 18, 1988
PURPOSE: To rezone from RM-2 to I-1 to allow an existing structure to be
finished and used for indoor storage by an electrical business.
PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Deny (16-2) .
ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Deny (6-1) .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny.
SUPPORT: 1 letter received.
OPPOSITION: None.
Dear Sir:
On January 7, 1988 the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a
public hearing on this rezoning. The petitioner testified. At the close of
the public hearing, the Committee voted 6 to 1 to deny the rezoning based on
staff findings.
On January 15, 3.988 the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's
recommendation 18 to 2.
This rezoning is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on February 18,
1988. Please notify me by February 17, 1988 if any member of the City Council
wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing.
Sincerely,
;��
� �,��
L�sa J. Freese
Planner II
LTF:rm
Attachments
� `
� �� city of saint paul
planning comrnission res�olution
f�e number 88-01
�te January 15, 1988
WHEREAS, James F. Laughlin, file #10228, has petitioned to rezone 561 Whitall Street
situated on the north side between Jessie and Edgerton from RM-2 to I-1 for the
purpose of permitting indoor storage for an electrical contractor business; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission on January 7, 1988, held a
public hearing at which all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard
pursuant to said application in accordance with the requirements of Section 64.400
of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and
WHEREAS, Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its
Zoning Committee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes,
made the following findings of fact:
1. According to property valuation records, a 26' by 40' structure was moved onto
this lot in the late 1970's, but a moving permit was not issued. The property
is taxed as commercial, but there is no record of its use prior to 1983. From
1983 to 1985 the garage was used as a residence. In 1986, the previous owner
began construction of a 26' by 30' addition on the north end of the existing
structure. Construction was stopped by the City.
2. The applicant recently purchased this property and proposes to finish the �
addition to the existing structure. He plans to use the building as storage for
his electrical business. Storage of contractor's equipment and supplies without
office or workshop facilities on premise is first permitted in an I-1 zoning
district. If there was also a contractor's office located here, this use would
be first permitted in a B-2 zoning district.
3. In an I-1 zone that abuts non-industrial district, a setback equal to a minimum
of one and one-half times the height of the building is required. The required
setback is approximately 15' from the west and north lot lines. The incomplete
addition is only 3' from the north lot line; to use this existing structure for
industrial storage would require a variance.
(continued)
moved by Christenson
5econded by Zieman
in favor �—
agaitist —
File #10228
Page Two
4. The topography of the area forms a natural break between the existing industrial
and residential districts. The land to the south and east is considerably lower
in elevation than the parcel in question. The elevation of this parcel is
similar the adjacent residential area. The topography of the area isolates the
parcel from the ad�acent I-1 district, so the rezoning does not appear to be
merely a logical extension of the district.
5. The District 5 Plan identifies improving the existing �ousing stock as one of
its major goals. Rezoning this parcel will encourage industrial encroachment in
a residential area the district has identified as a "residential improvement
area."
6. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to maintain and
enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering between incompatible
land uses. While the buffering between existing incompatible uses in this area
is not adequate, rezoning this property would not improve the situation. The
site is small and the building is not set back adequately from the property
line, so very little space between this property and the ad�acent properties is �
available for buffering. In addition, one of the city's industrial policy i
strategies is to increase the commercial and industrial land supply, but it
stipulates that such parcels should be sufficiently removed from residential
Iand uses so as to not adversely sffect them. Given the close proximity of this
site to a residential area, rezoning it would not meet the intent of this
strategy. This rezoning application is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission that the
petition of James F. Laughlin to rezone property at 561 Whitall Street more
particularly described as Lot 4, Block 1, Edmund Rice lst Addition from a RM-2
zoning classification to a I-1 zoning classification is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan for the City; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the Council of the City of Saint Paul that rezoning property located at
561 Whitall Street from RM-2 to I-1 be denied.
� � � � � � �'�r��
MINUTES OF THE ZONING COI�iITTEE
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SAINT YAUL, MINNESOTA ON JANUARY 7� 1988
S T: Mmes. Morton� Tracy and Zieman; Messrs. Christenson, Levy� Neid and
Repke of the Zoning Co�ittee; Mr. Segal� Assistant City Attorney;
Ms. Lane of the Building Inspection and Design Division; Ms.
Freese, Ms. Murray and Mr. Soderholm of the Planning Division
staff.
�S NT: Mr. Ferderer.
The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman.
James Lau�,hlin (#10228) : A Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1 for property located at
561 Whitall Street to allow the existing structure to be finished and used for
storage by an electrical contractor.
Ms. Freese showed slides of the site and reviewed the staff report with a
recommendation for denial. She stated that District 5 requested a layover.
Brett Laughlin, 2013 Thure Avenue, stated that it was his intent to use the
building for storage of electrical equipment and also for storage of antique
cars. He said that he would like to complete the existing illegal addition.
Mr. Christenson asked if the applicant owned the lot and if he uses it. Mr.
Laughlin replied that his father owns the lot and does use it.
Mr. Neid asked for the locatian of Mr. Laughlin's electrical business office.
Mr. Laughlin said 980 North Dale Street.
Mr. Neid asked Mr. Laughlin if he would be willing to locate the business
office at this site so the property could be used as a B-2 or B-3 use. Mr.
Laughlin replied that there is not enough space for both an office and a
storage facility.
Mr. Neid questioned the number of square feet inside the building. Mr.
Laughlin replied that there are 1800 square feet including the addition.
Hearing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing.
Mr. Neid made a motion to recommend denial of the rezoning to I-1 based on
staff findings. Mr. Repke seconded the motion which passed on a roll call
vote of 6-1 (Levy) .
Submitted by: Approved by:
C� �,��-�e,. Y�'t -
Lisa Freese G dys Morton, Chairman
' ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
FILE #10228
1. APPLICANT: James F. Laughlin DATE OF HEARING: 1/07/88
2. CLASSIFICATION: Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1
3. LOCATION: 561 Whitall Street (North side between Jessie and Edgerton)
4. PLANNING DISTRICT: 5
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 1� Edmund Rice lst Addition
6. PRESENT ZONING: RM-2 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: b4.400
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 12/17/87 BY: Lisa J. Freese
A. PURPOSE: To permit indoor storage for an electrical contractor business.
B. SUFFICIENCY: The petition was declared sufficient by the Planning Division on
November 23, 1987; 8 parcels eligible, 6 parcels required, 6 parcels signed.
C. LOT SIZE: The parcel is 132 feet in depth with a 44 foot frontage on Whitall
for a total lot area of approximately 5,800 square feet.
D. EXISTING LAND USE: The garage-like structure on the property is currently
vacant. The structure's last known use was residential. An unfinished addition
in the rear was begun illegally in 1986.
E. SURROUNDING LAND USE:
North and West: Residential, RM-2
East and South: Industrial, I-1
F. ZONING HISTORY: Prior to 1975 the property was zoned for "light industrial."
G. FINDINGS:
. ��- �u-��
File #10228
� Page Two
6. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to maintain and
enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering between incompatible
land uses. While the buffering between existing incompatible uses in this area
is not adequate� rezoning this property would not improve the situation. The
site is small and the building is not set back adequately from the property
line, so very little space between this property and the ad,jacent properties is
available for buffering. In addition, one of the city's industrial policy
strategies is to increase the commercial and industrial land supply, but it
stipulates that such parcels should be suff�cientZy removed from residential
Iand uses so as to not adverselp affect them. Given the close proximity of this
site to a residential area, rezoning it would not meet the intent of this
strategy. This rezoning application is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
H. �TAFF ANALYSIS: In the near future little potential exists for residential
development of the site. The existing structure is an eyesore, so rezoning and
the subsequent improvements planned by the applicant would provide immediate
improvement. In addition, contractor storage is a reasonable use of the
existing building. This requires a choice to be made between immediate
improvement of the site or long term goals for the area. Staff recommends
following the long term goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
I. STAFF RECONII�iENDATION: Based on staff findings l through 6, staff recommends
denial of the rezoning from RM-2 to I-1.
PETITION TO AMEND ZOMING CODE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY
File # �OZZg
�������� Application Fee $ ���J ��—/�( .—
OCT 2� 1987 Tentative Hearing �ate
��N�NG Number of Lots or Size of Parcel:
TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE �tO� 20 19 87
c/o Zoning Office, 11D0 City Hall Annex
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.357(5)
of the Minnesota Statutes, James F, Laughlin , the owner
of all of the land proposed for rezoning, hereby petitions your Honorable Body to
: rezone the following described property:
z : _. _
�, _ _.
�. S�reet Address. 56� i�.�.�.� ;�t. P�-. ,M�sata . _
-•�. . . _�=--� :,
Legal Description: �t 4, Block 1
F�iund Riae lst
from a residential� {�rVl--Z Zoning District
to a caYm�rcial �- � —'... Zoning District
�
for the purpose of finish building
Subscribed and sworn o By: �
before me this �01 da
of C'���r 19� Title. ��'
�� a. P age 1 of 3
Notary Public * 4080
,�`�. PAMELA A. �IUPPERT 2/$5
�"p'{� N07ARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA
RAMSEY COUNTY
��� My Comm.Expires Mar. 11, 1993
1r o
� - �. � � � ��- ti��G
CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING
: We, the undersigned, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous
descriptions of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by Petitioner within one year
preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the
following:
: 1 . A copy of the P et i t i on of �Ct.�►-'� JaQnes F. Laughlin
name of petitioner
2. A copy of Sections through , inclusive of the
St. Paul Zoning Code; and
acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a
District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be
established upon City Council approval of the rezonin;; and we hereby co�ser� to �t�e
rezoning of the property described in the
Petition of James F. Laughlin to a District.
name of petitioner
LOT BLOCK ADDITION RECORD OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
� l ��Np zt� /�e.��N ,�,. w�es� �'
�d r�� v�,,c� r oln,-.1 13 , � /S'7
l—�-.3 � t�� �.� � � S� d �.,, Q ,�a ���'�2-�—�� � ��
7 1 Echnund Ri�' i�u.0 �/, ,�3x b !���z.
/ �,, �
�7 l � `�U-nG� R�G.
� � 6'e r-a.!d �v--n,d : � -��
Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 working days
after a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may
withdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time.
P age 2 of 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
: SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
Jaanes F. Laughlin , being first duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the
person who circulated the within petition and consent, consisting of 1 pages; that
affiant is informed and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively
of the lots placed immediately before each name, that affiant is informed and believes
that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is within
100 feet from any property owned or purchased by petitioner or sold by petitioner
within one (1 ) year preceding the date of this petition which is contiguous to the
property described in the petition; that except for - - -
none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property from
petitioner contiguous to the above described property within one (1 ) year of the date
of the petition; t�at this ca�s�r�t was s;gre� 5y each o` said owr�ers in ihe �resence of
this affiant, and that the signatures are the true and correct signatures of each and
all of the parties so described.
� y � �
v�°�-
1918 Wellesley Ave.
Address
489-1303 �� 698-0482
Telephone Number
Subscribed nd sworn to efore
me thisaa� day of pPr , 19�5�
, Q�L�
Notary Public
,,w�n,u�
e nnnnnnnnnn^M^nn'^nn'v�nnnni`
���� P�� �� � L � � ����iT �
� �� r�, � �� � � ��i,��sora �
,���,�- , ,-,,
�lrl l � J �V.
�.� My Cem�r. ev,;,�rea�<"a. ii, 1993 �
ti vW�NVV W�/`�'Y�nNVVw�M;wwwv�r
Approved as to form - Feb. 85 Page 3 of 3
Planning Department
� � � � � - ��6 �
STATE OF MINNES�TA)
: SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
__�� r _, being first duly sworn, deposes and stat s that he is the
rson who circul ed the within petition and consent, consisting of � pages; that
a fiant is informed and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively
of the lots placed immediately before each name, that affiant is informed and believes
that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is within
100 feet from any property owned or purchased by petitioner or sold by petitioner
within one (1 ) year preceding the date of this petition whi h is contiguous to the
property described in the petition; that except for _______
none of the Qarties described above has purchased or is purchas�n property from
petitioner contiguous to the above described properiy wit�in ��e �?) y°ar of the date
of the petition; that this consent was signed by each of said owners in the presence of
this affiant, and that the signatures are the true and correct signatures of each and
all of the parties so described.
��"`"
`� �.c�Q�'�i
1918 Wellesley Avenue
Address
St. Paul, Minnesota 55105
�a...� 1� <in, Ede�r�c
(612) 698-0482 � '-�8°� - 13d"�
Telephone Number
Subscribed nd sworn �o before l��
me this�3� day of ��er�'�
-- �- --- --�.
Notary Publtc
■ r
,��... PAMELA A. hURr'ERT
�-�j"�k N07ARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA
RAMSEY�OUNTY
�•` My Comm. Expires Mar.11.1993
x +�
1
Ap�roved as to form - Feb. 85 Page � of �
���
Planning Department
u � �
. . CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONIN6
We, the undersigned, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous
descriptions of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by Petitioner within one year
preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the
following:
1 . A copy of the Petition of �� �^= '
nam of petitioner
2. A copy of Sections through , inclusive of the
St. Paul Zoning Code; and
acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a
District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be
es�ab':is�ed �:pon City Council �e�roval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the
reza�iny of the FropErty �escribed in th2
Petition of v�,•-. � ' to a District.
name of etitioner
LOT BLOCK ADDITION RECORD OWNER SI ATURE DATE
Sti on's Ad . to the 'It•vin City Auto & � 11-23-87
Cit of St. aul in the Mili Parts Inc
Sta of esota
E 1 of Vac alle ad'
and t 13 a so all of
vac lley ad' and Lots 1
Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 working days
after a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may
withdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time.
P age 2 of �
., • .
. • • ���/�' ��
� � ��
� �o 1��� /o Z�� � �,-� ti..-v
��� . �� ,
�
t
�..�t �...�1 ; o� ��� � � �..�-
. . . , ,
�i�.�.� . _ . .
6 9 3 /�L.�,�.a��, .
� p�,l �!�. s s„� .
�.�.- �i s � . _._.
ZONING FtLE
��:�
. �p��r�� Q p[��D�r� District Five Planning Council
1075 Arcade Street, Saint Paul, MN 55106 (612) 774-5234
December 29, 1987
Zoning Committee
St. Paul Planning Commission
City Hall Annex
St. Paul, MN 55102
Dear Commissioners :
The District Five Planning Council, upon recommendation of the
Land Use/Zoning Committee, took action on the following items at
the District Council meeting on december 15, 1987 .
- A motion to approve the application for a Non
Conforming Use Permit at 1084 Earl Street to allow for storage
addition was appraved contingent upon Zoning staff approval .
- A motion was approved to request a delay on the
application to rezone 561 Whitall from RM-2 to I-1 to allow for a
storage garage. The council felt that a solution could be sought
that would not require rezoning residential land to industrial if
the proposed use would qualify as a B-2 or B-3 zone.
'ncere y, /�
(
Ra M dorski,
Cha ' r erson
District Five
Planning Council
Z����1�� �� �� I0228
`
. �. .�
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
ZONING COMMITTEE
OF SAINT PAUL PLANNING COMMISSION
T0 PTOperty Owners within 350 feet;
Repcesentatives of Planning District 5
APPUCANT JAMES LAUGHLIN
To rezone from R�"-2 to I-1 to allow existing structure
PURPOSE to be finished and used for stqr�ge by an electrical
contractor.
LOCATlON 561 �lhitall Street (P�orthside between Jessie and Edgerton)
Of PROPERTY
Legal Descripcion: On file
TIME Of HEARIN6 Thursday, �anuary 7, 1987 3:30 p.M.
►
PLACE Of HEARIN6 City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hal1�St.pavt
1. You may attend hearing and testify -
HOW TO PARTICIPATE
2. You may send a letter before the hearing to the
Zoning Committee� 2S West Fourth Street,
St.Paul, Mn. 55102.
ANYQUESTIONS Call the Zoning office at 298-4154 (Lisa Freese)
or call your district council representative (. 774-5234 )
w�th the £ollowing information:
Zoning File No. 10228
Zoning File Name LAUGHLIN
` *iailing Date 12-24-87
• . ��-,�.,�--� �
.
' r
ITIZEN PAR ICIPA I DIS RI S
�M{wtfJ �4
.O.r � i � � � r � _ .. .
Y ) ■O w �w�Q+b� +c � \ t �
O
� \
R ♦ 3 � � w »EE� t r. r
12 . � *, �. � r..,.� .�s � �� s 5 ��.,.,� ,.
� 6 � �.
P.
� •4D • s
.Q.• :• E � .� � ° ��.
� �� ~ �
Y � � �
,, = 11 s � ,,p
,.�,,, � ,..�
�'4�dr � .«sw w4 ( �' � y� �
i.M , w f = � �v � N V' � � f M A
f
� � ,,.�.�.. � � R 4 . � `
: r s = �
E �« � .r �r.
� a � �
�,�,., .� ; `�+�, ... .�
'� � . . .,.. .� _ .b
' � � �'� ��
w
` 1W�1 rE F .� / n`� i� + +�Y
' �+ C w� � � ;
• �, � �
n n.n .�c � �`!� �, �'�,s p � 3 a ,� �
+ • + �,�ow
i ��. 14 �,.�. ,� 9 �,�; � �
�� „ � ,�,�
1 ,� ...a,w� .t t �.% � F p C ,, '' � �
�, � � ` � � � x 4 � . � a � � � � � �
..o� w�w. ro •�` �«,•• as � � A a ,
p o ,00 � �... � � F ....,
� A � ��Q i! + , � /
� ��� � w�-ar .R � .
� '" tono� �o ` �a
F '; , � �
P / j \
r � �
� �+ J �
_�
...r���' �I .
o fmo �om �mo'ur
1 W.
CI7IZEN PARTICIPATION PLANNING DISTRIC7S
1.SUNRAY-BATTLECREEK-HIGHWOOD
2.GREATER EAST SIDE
3.WEST �IDE
4.DAY ' F
6.NORTH END .
7.THOMAS-DALE
8.SUMMIT-UNIVERSITY
9.WEST SEVENTH
10.COMO
11 .HAMLINE-MIDWAY
12.ST. ANTHONY
13.MERRIAM PK.-LEXINGTON HAMLINE
14.GROVELANO-MACALESTER
15.HIGHLAND
16.SUMMIT HILL
17.DOWNTOWN
• •
� � � , � �/ I
s � � � � 't
. � ' �
. , . * � �
. • � _
' �� �
. • C• ' R�
• • ��i:7 . . . . �
u, •
. �
• ��� �� • • • • • ! . � . •
� ��� � •
.
� � � � ��
\� : �! , .� i" :� , I► �
• � �
` . a.i�/ �
� � - �
. � • � �7 �
. � • ,� 0� � .
• _ � • fi Ot7 a �.
��� � � �
� �
. . . �� . . . . . � � � :
„■,�, , o
� •� ' � � ' ' -
. c:� �i �
■°o. t:� ��o • �
o �
.
� �� � .
'� ..
I� --�������•
1 -
�
� —�— • — i � �
i i��� ���� - i ���
i
.
: i....r� .� j •
•N�-
i i w��� ��'G :..�.■�'
1 .Mi�-'- ��"" ■ .�_ _-/'
• � �...���"i i �
i _ �����- '�'���i i �
'�'��: i _����
♦ �
� � � �,
-- � � � � � - � o, t•a v
, , • .■� _ • c•�
. • � •
• p �s
!�
�■r.� • • l�i •
.
� ' 1Nd�dA A aad08 9NINNV�d �ftt/d 1NIbS
'ON dbW �dialsnorvi � •� � HlaON ,00a =„i :3��r�s
�vi�a3wwo� v � .
S ���wv� 3�dil�nw
0 �� L � 3ida
� 'ON 3�1�
Jl11Wb►� OM1
ls�alsro
JNINNb1d - Il11WtJ� 3N0 � � -
��� 3sodand
�la3doad 1�3rens �
�adoNnos l�ialsio 9NINOZ — —
aN3J3� 1Nd�l�dd`d
.
Iv��� v-1� �v
r
�' ' y �� � '� � � �/
ST. PAUL CITY COUNCiI.
PUB�IC HEARING � NOTICE
� �
ZONING -
�J�O ��
Q�t�G ��°�
0� �.�'��
<c, G
T0: Property owners within 350 feet; FILE N . G�0228
Representatives of Planning District 5. --
PAGE
PURPOSE
To rezone from RM-2 to I-1 to allow existing structure
to be finished and used for stroage by an electrical
contractor.
LOCATION
561 Whitall Street (Northside between Jessie and Edgerton)
PETITIONER
JAMES LAUGHLIN
H E A R I N� Thursday, February 18, 1988 9:00 A.�1. .
• Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House
Q U E S TIO N S Zoning 298-4154 (Lisa Freese)
Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex,
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesoia 55102
Notice sent 2_5_gg
��? ��. �: �
.. . . � i- . - , - - ��:�
. . , : , .
- : , . NOTtCE DF PUBLI4'�tHEt��I�l - � � ,:� � ������,.-_
A petitien ha�ag baea fi�bed requesting tlrat t}�e Zoni� Ordinanae Qt�b�eCi�y-;�
of St.Paul bea��:�. g ;:;
between Jessie andtEc�e�o�.T4� .ou� � '
,will h ar g�fiised�t�e-� th d8V of Apn2,-�9$�_a�'���� m �li�"�tici�l
Chambers�n th 3rd#1oor.of�i`�y-A'a� � . '�im ,arid laee th+e Caun�f f `,
� i�r&bnSF,ana 8TI ob�ectiorLS an�l,,raecommendaEioris xe�att`v� to:t�ie.`,,:
proposed amendxrient, . . . . ,_
.., ,,
3]a#,�� �.., . .
3�:1�$. - • ..
. _. _
.AL$ERT B:OL�O�T:CiL��lerl€:. � ,: , .., ,,
.; . . - f�rf12, 19�): . , �,' _
t.. . , .. - :. ., �
, ,_ ,.
,� . �
1 . �.�c��`,`^� Y � ��,� e ,, �s
� , �
� t4 3e .a�c '� ' Srw+�S„>�`� N� t..�`.,� � ,�?. � �c., . �° .a,°f" � }'��R�"n-.. �`,�. ,
. ' `� r�..` .A?ka,. ,,.'� Y{'1t' ,,f,.N"'�'�r}M #°. .�` 3 ` '�i� y � - *�_- _ �k�y X f,
y' _
J� �• �r .L. }i.G y 4 �.✓
�s s� 4 s� �y 3� x "`*� ° y
�: r :'y�' �,� .� y�, 3et 'S'eC����i���, ,e� q. k ..� i'
�'' >.�.�• �' _- � �, r-;�euRl� ,�' Y�j°'k :'"'� � •.�� �r,g �� '�'�nu
e
, .
-t+ t . �� . ::
... ,y�� �.. ; ` . �� r�.y�,, i���< . � .
.-
� "t ��`"V"; . '::`�-'� 3wk�> � �� ��.�., -. �, .
�^�' '� Y'Yats .'a x�+'�"..�'� 'y`2 a �,�.� �` t�'tr�t # . ' . �. •�, .
'��,t 5�} �.�^6 :. ;'t�Y�-C i" 1"p f> �1. � :. ,3. t�, h< � ( '..'q �" .��_ . ^�._-r, •
�J• '�4�?�Ws� "..9��.+�f}dCC$�Y��.+�b.,� ) 1. } 4� , " 4 '�', �,,�'.�n� ,�^. ry�.
.. � �, t �Y �y� x D L.?�+d�'�'i`�..r7� � `}���'� y j-�� ...� '*�To ���� �
. _ ' '�° �p.d�.s ,y„y�'C,i �f m �= iti.�':��/ � a.t`.rt3..y.�; �. .k'-a� k ...�.. � .:� -:y� .:
�" � �,�` •� ^ � . � • F,;:
. � `y;�" *� `is��.�{.t7F'��'¢�'�'� "�j �i�-b��`- � F"t����+- ...��- ��� �'-c..a.: � 'a�:�.
. . -w� ����t � �:� � ��. r � _ �.. �
� ' � f 'A^ t � 'J a<'� •;' d '��4�,1Y 4�5•'k^`r M�r..�.!Ft tRy��{Y�� �` ����+ Y. J ;N�N :
�� � ��
� �@�'.f. ` � ��y . � �� �.ti�'.r�'�_ � :.fi� ,�- ,w�' _.�,�'�.
�
, of• tt1e� Cf .; St. ,Fat�2, b� ,�.��90:�8- te� ����r�rr! �►�. tti I�.i P . '. � ����
, �.�p .,-�,A. * t�,�����ty. ( �- _
� � `�..�;!��� ��-�' ��i 'Ri73�.QJi�i ��� l-. ��.�°",y;; p.� c�.�..� �.
Z��:7 4
and EdgerCor��.-: The Go�ncil a�`r�CiLy of�S�t.� Peasi :b��f3a�� � "����'` ' � ����,
�` �:14t�h_+daY �_�1,� 1�8 at :9:A�''A:�:' a.n ,t�e fai�nci,L.� � tbe�- ti�`.-� �"��
.. , . � a� �• �
COt ,� � r 1111@ �It�$ ,Q�OBr�Ch@ � �-�� ���.:
�1@l7: 3��c�[l�.-$[K�'.,dZZ,C�7��a[tS � �1l1� "��us' � _+��
w .�,,x� *��'
. �'iey �,�Q� ��.ii6':.�4�C�e r�. :�"�,��'� �.. t� _ . `�; ".�' .�.,� a "��:�'.,`��
�� .� '.&�' ��� . '. �k 4 � 9�"
� . .Yr��.� •�i.�JV I � r t s f ��; �- r ���'-�.
..
. '
� . .�_.. ,. r y�,.. . . .,� 2 ;.,,�.,.. '.:.-.�.k.� ;y � r°.�F s. .. --s�,.,::t i•.'£ . . ycy�'�;"�`
. .. f •���f .. � v __• f, _ . , rF�.^ � • � {�,�
�_ t�.sa�: � �,., , ,� - ,, �,,,"
Ci�y Cledc ` l� , y� ` �
. '',a �:�t �� 3 . � . _ . `- .
I ���r: �-�'.4w �'_ �f firR � #- . tt�. �-.+�� t ' ,.�c���"fi +�
?tt_' -
�: �.. - > " ��r� � �p►P�z� �i Z�� _ _ f� � �-:�.,, � _ �
J
. . ,� .. � ,. 'd� �T ' . •
. .`�aYk '. _M1�-s �:i' fFt,°e ai��`��y - .. - � , ._ � �. �{�Y'=iq�'��'�
. y�'ca,�a.� _ 1}'"��. �� y-a"`� .»� ,�.s�� ' . :c '. y ���'
i�'��.lzrdtide, ��� .i l. ..TF ^�. 4,� S.
. .w,_� .' � a+,-.'t �.�R� A�i`t7�v�� 1�'`Y�"u . �.s.y`_ .-
' ' �.. `'�' . ���ts3 L , .#' �.
'�� ,w�:�y k�-r.s.�„�ae 1' n.�-�..�,4}nY�x,ry �r '�. *.q. - . ,. .� ���t,•�.
� - �� . f it � t.1�9'++�. -Kfit..�a t���r�."+MC,�"+..t 'X ;z. -".t �� � �� ,-r� ; ��.�r'z
- � � . ' 'RC� 4 �� .��� _3 � �. [ � � � � *,. - t 7'�-: ''�, .
�S �r c - 'YE t�, a�..cdi a' �r _ t- -f �-� �w �'�c
nit.. y . - t-�3.. TM� _
rn
- _� f R,�,},x� �.�; ��b�� *�s�` � , �
,d '� . f L+S' �' .�r--. .
= :. ,��R'i, -�w �`'�"'rY .c "+., <r � - . . ;� �
� �t � '{ . s. .-. t r- �,1J n��+d�'a�`� �03„ �. � t _ _` ' �'�. .
i �
.M-� yu = i.w .s� � t 'k ° -»� �.Y�N r b _ ' =.�` �,. : . '
d j' �' 6R¢fy� -�"� S:.f't �`4w a" __ �'���F�� "�° +Y
x s 'a.��,.a �S �
� i.'�`� ,i ��r��?�� :t��:'F ` �iiC.lZ".:. � .`�J � �"�{Y �. . • . ' V,Y"-ST�.i�?� �� 4irw+L..
. °'�c'P�'z..:,r- r 'i� ' t z�,il .'� �,Y�rR, '�'� "� 3-, �` _ ' . � f�, F �i' rs. i..a .�,r�_2
r:1 4 '�'"N ;4't.�- s, '�lS+�+v"�r� ��� * �a.4i�'' S w> >..
� ' {�� .r ���.k �l -r si` * t � l*'C.r� ..-.�F e Y' '� h y�,-'v�q'.e:
� � r
� � ?t.�"'<,F' ,� ' a�. � .:� c t ¢�' . -,;. ' '�S �.. <� � �.
. ��,��, x � �.� r ...w i+� , R r�« �. asx� .a r..�9,,t4 _ �S�+ )� ���t _ . 3
� ��',� . �r tt�rs a } y��d�:�4� a ,�. ,.:t �$ '`' � r"�3
... �, � ,vA-��-. = '� � F ' �: a� c .
ft:� ,yr��` n�Q� ..Y�:� � Er �k. ..7` , i. �.'� � .!
_ i.. +� x ' ,'
~�
' h' . 'FY+� . � 1 :; � f . y .:p t`� � c .
� �s���t _' ''� .�.��rf a f����= � �� % , � -�,'
� r T r'
r � � �' +�1 r .�+ �? i ��t'� c' f7 i+1 yi
r ' '� - 9f'' J. 'i¢.�` �, r 6 r .r. x a"+ �
�.� °� 2 y,�'� � i �.�•�'t� _a. ;�.'X yS�'��'}'�•"�"��R e 4 "5.� ��'�•r'.1 { ,r +t��. v�y�
�"'.'.�"' Y .�•l A"at* +.r ..�} �i':�. C�
.
#'s' .��'�" �� F ' �r � � 1�' �Y � w � �;a �h��c +"
��. ,:� . ..�x f.. -,�. r � . 7 ��i� - -� x
. -
� -�Iw..s+m.s�....� .x x ����ia .sY' .� �'.r ':�'. - ' ��, k`
* `�+ �. 1`� Y :� # . i � � � _,. !� y� 'kJ,
. . '4y/_��tYwb'��. 26�M�..R�v `' �:4� rl �. i � .k £� i�"' .1. ':F •Z'!� .. .
�r'wn , i ♦ S.• � �.`29 AZ' M C. �. �l't � 2 Z, . „ �
W^�le�lk � '�. m'n...::X.i.� ' ' s w�.r t `. �M � �,�f _J t+ k �1 'da2�w� �
. �� .�' .' �.,-, i'/ . ��. 7.�.,�, i dr '- � :. ��- .",
s10 C• � $�'y� •.,.. .t r � � . � :: t�. S,�. _
. .� � i � l.k. sn' 6::' °4'�F! : t .. � � �J '. , Z�. Y' �"4 S ':
' � � : �"�T�+`y°: �ssi.,� � ���+w �' '�' s, �vl, o �.i l�� b '�� � � 4 �'Y- .L .� . -I i:e ��`i`�
y � Y i p
. ,.��y���,r�. s .���Cr dt-r��� �u'y�r��,.x�',�.y �ti „i.{.s .� i;�; t .;,.���._i.��= @ '�Y f �'4� 3 ``�4 r ..�. .;�'" �ry:�.
1.: � a�+ � :� +� i�nR ' l 4Z 5 „" '� � .�� .
� "y b .a'... � ' � t i ` S^�1` �" �2` �L"y '� �.'... a �� � ?'1�1 ��� ' J` - '..ie- g .
;'°3T'"�- -e :c. ��; �'^�` s ���vi�' x t.� .- r',t a ,�: , ' -:r 1� � �'�p�� �.
....y� . �.'f :a t,+l,"�t �1 -t� •Y t , _ t.�, i �, t � � �
��r---': _ � �-1�.R � `it �s'•'�� ,�'� r^,k,: a� �,�*�v.��; +'�, c - ��'"� f 'F :� !�� � 'S;
.�a wL i ► . r - ,...'�-�1x�!- yr. > .r � ��� � f `� � ,wm� �
.. a F�"�'<�, '.��f�y�,�..4° r+�.� �sa`�''Y`a ���,I�: � " '''�r � �_ �-' �''+FS*�` �� 3, > >,�
.�.
' .
r -
�� } �� .� a�.«� ..: � : fr p a r,• � ..
s �..� EI ' "+� �1�." {'�iJ..�� ,� � , a4£� ���- ` t � �
� k.. �; � :J. � a.�a n; �� F'
.:. 4 . . _. , : .
. . �.� y?.�� «F.• Y; t��a
'y��y"r �.�.xi''.4:.
. . . ��.,�.V
M�SY
3:ir
tn
l:�
;:a�n'
�. . ..Y��:,
� k. ''':'�.
� � ��4
4 . /
ST. PAUL CITY COUNCII.
PUBI.IC HEARING NOTICE
ZONING -
T0: Property owners within 350 feet; FIL E N 0 10228
Representatives of Planning District 5. �
PAGE
PURPOSE
To rezone from RM-2 to I-1 to allow existing structure
to be finished and used for stroage by an electrical
contractor.
LOCATION
561 Whitall Street (Northside between Jessie and Edgerton)
PETITIONER
JAMES LAUGHLIN
HEARING Thursday, April 14, 1988 9:00 A.<<1. .
. Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House
Q U E S TIO N S Zoning z9a-4154 (�;Sa Freese)
Contact the Zoning Secti�n of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex,
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102
Notice sent 2_5_gg
�� � ��
��`��1? �•+,
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
° ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
` ___�1 tuu �
r� ,�c DIVISION OF PLANNItiG
25 West Fourth Street,Saint Pwl,Minnewta 55/02
1�6�
612-22&3270
GEORGE UITIMER
MAYOR
April 28, 1988
Council President James Scheibel and
Members of the City Council
Seventh Floor City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
RE: Zoning File #10228 - James Laughlin
City Council Hearing: April 28, 1988
Dear President Scheibel and Council Members:
The applicant's initial request to rezone this parcel from RM-2 to I-1 was
reviewed by the Zoning Committee and Planning Commission. On January 7, 1988
the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
rezoning. The petitioner testified. At the close of the public hearing, the
Committee voted 6 to 1 to deny the rezoning based on staff report findings. On
January 15, 1988 the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's
recommendation 18 to 2.
Subsequently, the applicant has decided to put a 176 square foot office on the
second floor of the structure with the remainder of the building being used for
storage of equipment and supplies. The office will serve as a satellite office
for his electrical contractor's business. Since a contractor's office with
indoor storage is first permitted in the B-2 zoning district, the applicant is
asking the Council to consider rezoning to B-2 instead of I-1.
The District S Planning Council has reviewed Mr. Lauglin's revised request and
voted to support rezoning the parcel to B-2.
Planning staff evaluated this request and has made the following findings:
1. The applicant operates an electrical business in St. Paul and intends
to use this structure for a secondary office and indoor storage. A
contractor's office with indoor storage is first permitted in a B-2
zoning district.
2. The existing unfinished state of the building poses a health and
safety threat to the immediate neighborhood.
File #10228
Page T�o
.
3. The parcel in question abuts residential uses to the north and west
and industrial uses on the south and east. The topography of the area
forms a natural break between the existing residential and industrial
uses with the land to the south and east being considerably lower in
elevation than the parcel in question. To extend industrial uses into
the residential area is inappropriate.
4. The B-2 Community Business District is more restrictive than the I-1
district and the types of uses permitted the district are more
compatible with the adjacent residential uses.
5. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to
maintain and enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering
between incompatible land uses. Rezoning this parcel to B-2 would
allow a problem building to be improved and would buffer the
residential area from the more intense nonresidential uses.
6. If the rezoning is approved, the applicant must request a zoning
variance for setback requirements. In a B-2�'�s�tructures must be set
back 10 feet from adjoining residentially zoned lots. The structure
is setback 8 feet from the west property line and 3 feet from the
north property line. As well, the applicant must improve the site to
current city standards.
Based on the above staff findings, staff recommends approval of the rezoning
from RM-2 to B-2.
Sincerely,
O`�G¢a �.�t.ea.�..
Lisa J. Freese
Planner II
LJF:rm
Attachments
STEVEN R. RliTZICK 8t ASSOCIATES
ATTORNEYS A COUNSElORS AT LAW
SjE VEN R RUTi1GK aps Gw���11r►ROiEStrONA�kOG.
TMOMAS e SCNwAr 17 WE3T EXCMANGE STREET
ST. PAUI,MINNESOTA SS102
IMONt d 12-221-1022
TELEX s�10-Sd,3-�7St
February 25, 1988
St . Paul City Counsel Members
St . Paul City Hall
St . Paul , Minnesota 55102
- Dear Counsel Member: - - -
Please be advised that the undersigned represents James F.
Laughlin in regard to his rezoning request for 561 Whitall
Street from RM-2 to I-1 , which has been scheduled to be heard on
Thursday, March 3 .
By this writing, you are advised that Mr . Laughlin has
requested that the rezoning now be f�om RM-2 to B2 , which is an
entirely different request then was presently befvre you. The
structure, as it now exists fits the definition of B2 and we
would therefore ask that your due consideration be given to this
usage.
It is my intention to meet with each of you prior to the
hearing to discuss any questions or problems that you may have
in regard to this zuning request .
Very truly yours ,
: �
STEVErI R". UT7ICKr & ASS�O.CIATES
� �\ � ,
� - ,� , ,
`,= ._.�
� ey R: utzick �
A urney at Law �
SRR :dj
cc: Lisa Freese
Pat Ryde ;
James F . Laughlin �
a4 !
_ i
I I
I ( I
I ' I
� �
� � I �
�
� � p E (
�
' i p a �
� rt I
I j� (
� � �
I �
� _ �� �-
� �
� �---- i �
__ __ .__-- ___ ._ i
3' ��
2
0C
4 I� J
r�
_ � T � N . I
6�. � D 0 qa -� j
o n � �. �
a p
�
� t� �� � i R
o ; �
�•
�, --
�
;
�SS F
r--- —
(� Q.
o s �
� c
� � � � -
. � �
.�►r♦ o� ��� ��..��� U
4' �= CITY OF SAINT PAUL
° � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
, ,
y O
DIVISION OF PLANNING
�� A !-_-� `_�- .,=__v_•_
1��• �W��VYfY��'�i��!rwq�M�Y���
. 612-22&3270
GEORGE UTIMER
MAYOR
February 8, 1988
Albert Olson, City Clerk
Room 386, City Hall
Saint Paul, t�T 55142
RE: Zoning File #10228 - James Laughlin
City Council Hearing: February 18, 1988
PURPOSE: To rezone from RM-2 to I-1 to allow an existing structure to be
finished and used for indoor storage by an electrical business.
PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Deny (16-2) .
ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Deny (6-1) .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deny.
SUPPORT: 1 letter received.
OPPOSITION: None.
Dear Sir:
On January 7, 1988 the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a
public heariag on this rezoning. The petitioner testified. At the close of
the public hearing, the Committee voted 6 to 1 to deny the rezoning based on
staff findings.
On January 15, 1988 the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's
recommendation 18 to 2.
This rezoning is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on February 18,
1988. Please notify me by February 17, 1988 if any member of the City Council
wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing.
Sincerely,
� (,� �it.lJa.2
Lisa J. Freese
Planner II
IJF:rm
Attachments
city.of saint pa�d
pianning commission re�soh.�tion
f�e number 88-�1
�te January 15, 1988
WHEREAS, James F. Laughlin, file #10228. has petitioned to rezone 561 Whitall Street
situated on the north side between Jessie and Edgerton from RM-2 to I-1 for the
purpose of permitting indoor storage for an electrical contractor business; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission on January 7, 1988, held a
public hearing at which all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard
pursuant to said application in accordance with the requizements of Section b4.400
of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and
WHEREAS, Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its
Zoning Committee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes,
made the following findings of fact:
1. According to property valuation records, a 26' by 40' structure was moved onto
this lot in the late 1970's, but a moving permit was ndt issued. The property
is taxed as commercial, but there is no record of its use prior to 1983. From
1983 to 1985 the garage was used as a residence. In 1986, the previous owner
began construction of a 26' by 30' addition on the north end of the existing
structure. Construction was stopped by the City.
2. The applicant recently purchased this property and proposes to finish the
addition to the existing structure. He plans to use the building as storage for
his electrical business. Storage of contractor's equipment and supplies without
office or workshop facilities on premise is first permitted in an I-1 zoning
district. If there was also a contractor's office located here, this use would
be first permitted in a B-2 zoning district.
3. In an I-1 zone that abuts non-industrial district, a setback equal to a minimum
of one and one-half times the height of the building is required. The required
setback is approximately 15' from the west and north lot lines. The incomplete
addition is only 3' from the north lot line; to use this existing structure for
industrial storage would require a variance.
(continued)
moved by Christenson
s�econded by Zieman
. in fav{or 1-
.
against-
�� - /��(U
File #10228
Page Two
4. The topography of the area forms a natural break between the existing industrial
and residential districts. The land to the south and east is considerably lower
in elevation than the parcel in question. The elevation of this parcel is
similar the adjacent residential area. The topography of the area isolates the
parcel from the adjacent I-1 district, so the rezoning does not appear to be
merely a logical extension of the district.
S. The District 5 Plan identifies improving the existing housing stock as one of
its major goals. Rezoning this parcel will encourage industrial encroachment in
a residential area the district has identified as a °residential improvement
area. "
6. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to maintain and
enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering between incompatible
land uses. While the buffering between existing incompatible uses in this area
is not adequate, rezoning this property would not improve the situation. The
site is small and the building is not set back adequately from the property
line, so very little space between this property and the adjacent properties is
available for buffering. In addition, one of the city's industrial policy
strategies is to increase the commercial and industrial land supply, but it
stipulates that such parcels should be sufficiently removed from residential
Zand uses so as to not adversely affect them. Given the close proximity of this
site to a residential area, rezoning it would not meet the intent of this
strategy. This rezoning application is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission that the
petition of James F. Laughlin to rezone property at 561 Whitall Street more
particularly described as Lot 4, Block 1, Edmund Rice lst Addition from a RM-2
zoning classification to a I-1 zoning classification is inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan for the City; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the Council of the City of Saint Paui that rezoning property located at
561 Whitall Street from RM-2 to I-1 be denied.
MINUTES OF THE ZONING CO[�iITTEE
' CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS� SAINT PAUL� IiINNESOTA ON JANUARY 7� 1988
�RESENT Mmes. Morton, Tracy and Zieman; Iiessrs. Christenson, I.evy� Neid and
Repke of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Segal, Assistant City Attorney;
lis. Lane of the Building Inspection and Design Division; I�s.
Freese, lis. Murray and Mr. Soderholm of the Planning Division
staff.
ABSENT: Mr. Ferderer.
The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairanan.
James Laug�hlin (s�10228) : A Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1 for property located at
561 Whitall Street to allow the existing structure to be finished and used for
storage by an electrical contractor.
Ms. Freese showed slides of the site and reviewed the staff report with a
recommendation for denial. She stated that District 5 requested a layover.
Brett Laughlin, 2013 Thure Avenue, stated that it was his intent to use the
building for storage of electrical equipment and also for storage of antique
cars. He said that he would like to complete the existing illegal addition.
Mr. Christenson asked if the applicant owned the lot and if he uses it. Mr.
Laughlin replied that his father owns the lot and does use it.
Mr. Neid asked for the location of Mr. Laughlin's electrical business office.
Mr. Laughlin said 980 North Dale Street.
Mr. Neid asked Mr. Laughlin if he would be willing to locate the business
office at this site so the property could be used as a B-2 or B-3 use. Mr.
Laughlin replied that there is not enough space for both an office and a
storage facility.
l�Ir. Neid questioned the number of square feet inside the building. Mr.
Laughlin replied that there are 1800 square feet including the addition.
Hearing no further testimony, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing.
Mr. Neid made a motion to recommend denial of the rezoning to I-1 based on
staff findings. Mr. Repke seconded the motion which passed on a roll call
vote of 6-1 (Levy) .
Submitted by: Approved by:
�x� �ti�e. V� -
Lisa Freese G dys liorton, Chairman
��'-,�;�� v
ZONING COI�iITTEE STAFF REPORT
FILE #10228
1. APPLICANT: James F. Laughlin DATE OF HEARING: 1/07/88
2. CLASSIFICATION: Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1
3. IACATION: 561 Whitall Street (North side between Jessie and Edgerton)
4. PIANNING DISTRICT: 5
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 1, Edmund Rice lst Addition
6. PRESENT ZONING: RM-2 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 64.400
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 12/17/87 BY: Lisa J, Freese
A. URPOS : To permit indoor storage for an electrical contractor business.
8. SUFFICIENCY: The petition was declared sufficient by the Planning Division on
November 23, 1987; 8 parcels eligible� 6 parcels required, 6 parcels signed.
C. I.OT SIZE: The parcel is 132 feet in depth with a 44 foot frontage on Whitall
for a total lot area of approximately 5,800 square feet.
D. EXISTING LAND USE: The garage-like structure on the property is currently
vacant. Tfie structure's last known use was residential. An unfinished addition
in the rear was begun illegally in 1986.
E. SUR.ROiJNDING LAND USE:
North and L1p�r• °--' ' -
�'�'-,�;�G �
ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
FILE #10228
1. APPLICANT: James F. Laughlin DATE OF HEARING: 1/07/88
2. CLASSIFICATION: Rezoning from RM-2 to I-1
3. LOCATION: 561 Whitall Street (North side between Jessie and Edgerton)
4. PLANNING DISTRICT: 5
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 1� Edmund Rice lst Addition
6. PRESENT ZONING: RM-2 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 64.400
7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 12/17/87 BY: Lisa J. Freese
A. URPOS : To permit indoor storage for an electrical contractor business.
B. SUFFICIENCY: The petition was declared sufficient by the Planning Division on
November 23, 1987; 8 parcels eligible, 6 parcels required, 6 parcels signed.
C. LOT SIZE: The parcel is 132 feet in depth with a 44 foot frontage on Whitall
for a total lot area of approximately 5,800 square feet.
D. EXISTING LAND USE: The garage-like structure on the property is currently
vacant, The structure's last known use was residential. An unfinished addition
in the rear was begun illegally in 1986.
E. SURROUNDING LAND USE:
North and West: Residential, RM-2
East and South: Industrial, I-1
F. �ONING HISTORY: Prior to 1975 the property was zoned for "light industrial.°
G. FINDINGS:
1. According to property valuation records a 26' by 40' structure was moved onto
this lot in the late 1970's, but a moving permit was not issued. The property
is taxed as commercial. but there is no record of its use prior to 1983. From
1983 to 1985 the garage was used as a residence. In 1986, the previous�t owner
began construction of a 26' by 30' addition on the north end of the existing
structure. Construction was stopped by the City.
2. The applicant recently purchased this property and proposes to finish the
addition to the existing structure. He plans to use the building as storage for
his electrical business. Storage of contractor's equipment and supplies without
office or workshop facilities on premise is first permitted in an I-1 zoning
district. If there was also a contractor's office located here, this use would
be first permitted in a B-2 zoning district.
3. In an I-1 zone that abuts non-industrial district, a setback equal to a minimum
of one and one-half times the height of the building is required. The required
setback is approximately 15' from the west and north lot lines. The incomplete
addition is only 3' from the north lot line; to use this existing structure for
izdustrial storage .would require a variance.
4. The topography of the area forms a natural break between the existing industrial
and residential districts. The land to the south and east is considerably lower
in elevation than the parcel in question. The elevation of this parcel is
similar the adjacent residential area. The topography of the area isolates *_he
parcel from the adjacent I-1 district� so the rezoning does not appear to be
merely a logical extension of the district.
� . The District 5 Plan identifies improving the existing housing stock as one of
its major goals. Rezoning this parcel will encourage industrial encroachment ��
a residential area the district has identified as a "residen�ial improvemen�
�rea. "
File #10228
Page 'hio
6. Objectives of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan are to maintain and
enhance neighborhoods and to create or improve buffering between incompatible
land uses. While the buffering between existing incompatible uses in this area
is not adequate, rezoning this property would not improve the situation. The
site is small and the building is not set back adequately from the property
line, so very little space between this property and the adjacent properties is
available for buffering. In addition, one of the city's industrial policy
strategies is to increase the commercial and industrial land supply, but it
stipulates that such parcels should be suffictently removed from resident�al
Zand uses so as to not adversely affect them. Given the close proximity of this
site to a residential area� rezoning it would not meet the intent of this
strategy. This rezoning application is not in conforaance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
H. �TAFF ANAI,YSIS: In the near future little potential exists for residential
development of the site. The existing structure is an eyesore, so rezoning and
the subsequent improvements planned by the applicant would provide immediate
improvement. In addition, contractor storage is a reasonable use of the
existing building. This requires a choice to be made between immediate
improvement of the site or long term goals for the area. Staff recommends
following the long term goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
I. STAFF RECOI�II�SENDATION: Based on staff findings 1 through 6, staff recommends
denial of the rezoning from RM-2 to I-1.
PETITI�N TO AMEND ZONING CODE
� CITY OF SAINT PAUL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY
File # �C (� ��
F�ECE��E� Appl ication Fee S � .���— /�
�
OCT 2� 19�7 Tent at i ve Hear i ng Date
ZONING Number of Lots or Size of Parcel :
________________________________________
TO TNE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE �r 20 19 87
c/o Zoning Office, 1100 City Hali Annex
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
Pursuant to Section 64.210 of the St. Paul Zoning Ordinance and Section 462.351(5)
of the Minnesota Statutes, James F. Laughlin , the owner
of all of the land proposed for rezoning, hereby petitions your Honorable Body to
rezone the following described property:
Street Address• 561 Whitall, St. P�1, Minnesota
Legal Description: � 4, Block 1
Ec�mmd Rice lst
from a residential� �rYl—Z Zoning District
to a cannercial �-- � — '.. Zoning District
for the purpose of finish builc7ing
Subscribed and sworn o By: �
before me this �_ da
of �c�r 19� Title. ��'
�� P age 1 of 3
Notary Public ^^^^ ��^:�J�ti•�^•; .ti•:� ,��-, 4080
,�� P. �� -. - -i � 2/85
�.� �z.:� -_ _- - �
�_ _ � ._ � _-_ �
7f WV1N'J'.Vw,.�,,-�•.��.��.v,rv',.^:.";t✓�✓�.�:'.'YJ�
�,�-: ,��„� -U ,
• CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING
We, the undersigned, owners of property within 100 feet of the total contiguous
descriptions of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by Petitioner within one year
preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the
following:
1 . A copy of the Petition of ��-+�►-��e_ J�nes F. Iaughlin
name of petitioner
2. A copy of Sections through , inclusive of the
St. Paul Zoning Code; and
acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a
District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be
established upon City Council aoproval of the rezoning; znd we hereby co�ser:. t� the
rezoning of the property described in the
Petition of J�nes F. Laughlin to a District.
name of petitioner
LOT BIOCK ADDITION RECORD OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
� l �a�,��p �, A�,� �,. w���
�� � ' �/g�
Fd wt v�,..E , tr aott-+1 Q ,
/—�3 � A��Q s . .., � •-a 5 �� �—�� 3 �'7
7 1 F.c�nund xioe' ;�u c ,�/, aa b !.�z. , , _
� i � �
�o � �� 5�-x.� r►�. Ger-a.�d L v-�,d .
� �'
Petitions shall not be considered as official7y filed until the lapse of 7 working days
af ter a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may
withdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time.
P age 2 of 3
STATE aF MINNESOTA)
. . SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
Janes F. Iaughlin , being first duly sworn, deposes and states that he is the
person who circulated the within petition and consent, consisting of 1 pages; that
affiant is informed and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively
of the lots placed irtanediately before each name, that affiant is informed and believes
that each of the parties described above is the owner of property which is within
100 feet from any property owned or purchased by petitioner or sold by petitioner
within one (1 ) year preceding the date of this petition which is contiguous to the
property described in the petition; that except for - - -
none of the parties described above has purchased or is purchasing property from
petitioner contiguous to the above described property within one (1 ) year of the date
of the petition; that this cans�r�t �vas s:gned by each of said owners in the presence oT
this affiant, and that the signatures are the true and correct signatures of each and
all of the parties so described.
_ ,�„� `� ►
1918 Wellesley Ave.
Address
489-1303 U'� � 698-0482
Telephone Number
Subscribed nd sworn to efore
me thisd� day of bC�r , 19�57
1�% , Q��L�
Notary Public
•M/v��,Vl^M/V�/�'��.1,1,M.4Y^^.ti?:1h�.V�A>•
�'=-'_ P�.' � .. !';; o�_:i A >
y � �� _�_ Z
�s, '�r � �
-:�\�: r,.,T�-. _ -.._.. . � -.,'=`� >
•w,n.vwtivv�nnv�,nr.tiv.,,,._•,�nr.•�-:v.r.
Approved as to form - Feb. 85 Page 3 of 3
Pianning Department
�'� - .,�.-��� �
STATE• OF MINNESOTA)
, : SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
___._._� 1 •
_, being first duly sworn, deposes and stat s that he is the
p rson who circul ed the within petition and consent, consisting of � pages; that
a fiant is informed and believes that the parties described are the owners respectively
of the lots placed immediately before each name, that affiant is infcrmed and believes
that each of the parties described above is the owner of property wfiich is within
10� feet from any property owned or purchased by petitioner or sold by petitioner
within one (1) year preceding the date of this petition whi�_is contiguous to the
property described in the petition; that except for __
none of the aarties described above has purchased or is purchas�n property from
petitioner contiguous to the above described property wi�hin cne �1) year of the date
of the petition; that this consent was signed by each of said owners in the presence of
this affiant, and that the signatures are the true and correct signatures of each �nd
all of the parties so described.
i
�,'„", �
1918 Wellesley Avenue
Address
St. Paul, Minnesota 55105
ta.�g � �i7. E�et�'ic
(612) 698-0482 � '�-+8q - �3d3
Telephone Number
Subscribed nd sworn �o before
me thisa3� day of ��er�be�; 1�'s-1
-- -�- - - -
Notary Publtt
.� .
PAMELA A. hUPr'ERT
� N07AqY a'BLIC—M�NNES07A
RAMSEY COUNTY
`�-�' My Comm. Ezmres Mar.11,1993
t :
Aparoved as to form - Feb. 85 Page �� of ;
Planning Department
. �
. CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING
- We, the undersigned, owners of property within 100 feet of the total tontiguous
descriptions of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by Petitioner within one year
preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the
f ollowing:
.
1 . A copy of the Petition of L+�-�- �'�
n of petitioner
2. A copy of Sections through , inclusive of the
St. Paul toning Code; and
acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a
Oistrict zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be
es�ab?ish�� upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the
rezo�iny of the Frop�rty �escribed in the
Petition of w�. �- ` to a Oistrict.
name of etitioner
LOT BLOCK ADOITION REC�tD OWNER SI ATURE DATE
S ' n's , to the �� �ty Auto &
Ci of St. aul in the Mili Parts Inc 11-23-87
Sta of sota
E 1 of Vac all ad'
and t 13 a so all of
vac lley ad' and Ipts 1
Petitions shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of 7 working days
after a petition is received in the Zoning Office. Any signator of any petition may
Nithdraw his name therefrom by written request within that time.
P age 2 of �—
. `� � � , ;�
�" , -�--�
�� � �� � ,
_�J,,L►-�C�.u1� �c-ni�} /��..�C- �c L��j ��.,,_- �
� , ,
, �t�'�Y ..�'/-J C�. .G/L/--`[� V`T zY�2-*�'
(�.2'�-�..�...-- ��� Q.�f� . � /
Y
r
1
i
v �_�,..."��.M.�+��-�-�--�/
,'6 y 3 �`'�+-�a�c-�.n
-�-� ��--� ��-. 5 S i i�
.�.L-�.u.... � s" ����--
ZONING
F�LE .���
��_.. ,L,''G U
C����� Q G°�(��Oo� District Five Plann�ng Council
1075 Arcade Street, Saint Paul, MN 55106 (612) 774-5234
December 29 , 1987
Zoning Committee
St. Paul Planninq Commission
City Hall Annex
St. Paul, 1�1 55102
Dear Commissioners :
The District Five Planning Council, upon recommendation of the
Land Use/Zoning Committee, took action on the following items at
the District Council meeting on december i5, 1987 .
- A motion to approve the application for a Non
Conforming Use Permit at 1084 Earl Street to allow for storage
addition was approved contingent upon Zoning staff approval .
- A motion was approved to request a delay on the
application to rezone 561 Whitall from RM-2 to I-1 to allow for a
storage garage. The council felt that a solution could be sought
that would not require rezoning residential land to industrial if
the proposed use would qualify as a B-2 or B-3 zone.
'ncere y, �
�
Ra M dorski,
Cha 'r rson
District Five
Planning Council
Z��v�i�'��? �ti �� 1oZzg
, � ' PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
ZONING COMMITTEE
OF SAINT PAUL PLANNING COMMISSION
T� Property Ovners withi� 350 feet;
Representatives of Planniag DistTic[ 5
APPUCANT JAMES LAUGHLIN
To rezone from Rt�-2 to I-1 to allow existing structure
PURPOSE to be finished and used for stor�ge by an electrical
contractor.
LOCATlON 561 :Jhitall Street (Morthside between Jessie and Edgerton)
OF PROPERTY
Legal Descripcion: On file
TIME Of HEARIN6 Thursday, �anuary 7, 1987 3:30 p.M.
�
PLACE OF HEARIM6 City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Rall.St.Psul
1. You may attend hearing and testify -
HOW TO PARTlCIPATE
2. You may send a lettet Sefore the hearing to the
Zoning Committee, 2S �lest Fourth Street,
St.Paul, Mn. 55102.
ANYQUESTION$ �all che zon�ng office at 298-4154 (�isa Freese)
or call your district council representative ( 774-5234 )
with [he follotiring information;
Zoning File No. 10228
Zoning File Naa�e LAUGHLIN
Mailing Date 12-24-87
�s t �'�7 rl 0 'nd !�— �— �� � -
� —
3rd � /CJ _ � Adopted �— �� '-��'
�
" • Yeas i�TayS :
DREt�
- NICOSIA �' �J~l0/
RE2'r.�IAN
SCHEIBEL
�. .. � . . .. ._ . SO��iF:�T . . . � . .
kTILS ON
WEIDA
_ PRESIDENT:
i _ - .
r t.$.K.�vs..r..w _. . ..•�.eb..:.+rz'.r.`mw�^+.�,.�..M.:,: , ,.h,fl+...ro-Y•.meu'iavr.k..iv.�-.b:;;w., . ':+w�e+s}�)w.- .-. . , 15°,.�Jti7f7MA"'xs..se'�7�-�ia'1e`��5�'G^�� '�`w"�N,�'e'�`i".�Ml�*�iYs�i%!Y++��-�_ ..^+ti+�ppe�.
�:.
. . . � o'�-�� �..e....�--
WMITE - CITV CLERK .
PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council �jG {J.,/
BIUERV- MAVORTMENT File NO. ,J v /,�+ `�' I
_ Ordind CG Ordinance 1�0.
_ �� ��
Presented By / '
'� Referred To �� ' Committee: Date ��� ° °
Out of Committee By Date
An interim ordinance restricting new
development in the area described as
bounded by White Bear Avenue, Third
Street , Ruth Street and I-94 pending
the completion of studies of possible
amendments to the City' s Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Regulations , this interim
ordinance being adopted pursuant to the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes , § 462. 355,
subd. 4.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
Section l .
The Saint Paul City Council has initiated a study of that
area of the city described as bounded by White Bear Avenue,
Third Street , Ruth Street and I-94 for the purpose of deter-
mining whether the city' s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regu-
lations should be amended, with a special reference given to
considering whether the existing multiple family zoning classifi-
cations are appropriate or consistent with the adjacent develop-
ments that have occurred within that area. The Planning Com-
mission of the City of Saint Paul has been requested by the
City Council to conduct its study and submit to the Council
its findings and conclusions.
Section 2.
Pending the completion of the studies and the possible
adoption of necessary amendments to the city' s Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Regulations , not to exceed one year from the
date of the adoption of this ordinance , the building official
is hereby directed not to issue any building permits for new
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Yeas Nays Requested by Department of:
Dimond
�ng [n Favor
Goswitz
Rettman /
scne�t�i . .� � Against BY
Sonnen �
Wilson /�/
� I.
Form Approve y City Attor y
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Passed by Council Secretary ��� BY
By �'
Approved by Mayor: Date Approve b Mayor for Su mission to Council
By BY