88-1514 WHITE - C�TV CLERK
PINK ._.- FF?IANCE COUflC1I `'
BLU�R~- MA`VORTMENT GITY OF SAINT PAUL File NO. `�� ��� -
. Coun ' Resolution f'�
�__�
Presented By
Refe o Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date �
WHEREAS, Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association has submitted the attached
proposed lot split for City Council approval ; and
WHEREAS, the Departments of Planning and Economic Development and Public Works
have reviewed the proposed split for 282 Sherburne Avenue, as described on the
attached survey; and
WHEREAS, the proposed split meets the requirements of Section 67.304 of the
Zoning Code, except for the minimum lot size requirements of 5,000 square feet;
the lot will have 4,690 square feet if split; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on August 25, 1988 held a public hearing to determine
the advisability and necessity for the granting of variances from the strict
application of the provisions of Section 61.101 of the Zoning Code; at which
hearing all persons present were given an opportunity to testify; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council made the following
findings of fact:
1. The intent of chapter 67.100 is met;
2. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property or improvements
in the neighborhood in which the property is located;
3. The conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are unique
to the property for which the variance is sought and are generally not
applicable to other property;
4. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Dimond �
Long [n Favor
Goswitz
Rethnan
Sc6eibel A gai n s t BY
Sonnen
Wilson
Form App o d by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
gy,
t�pproved by Mavor: Date Approv y Ma r or Su ission to Council `
By
WHITE - CITY CLERK
P�NK _ -,F�NANCE G I TY OF SA I NT PAIT L Council /� �}
CAN�RY - DF_�PARTMENT �yr,�/�
BLUE - MlfVOR File NO• l� �v�
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
5. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant; and
6. Because of the particular natural surroundings, shape or topographical
conditions of the specific property involved, unusual hardship to the
owner would result, as distinguished from mere inconvenience, if the
strict letter of these regulations were carried out.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accepts and approves the
lot split for 282 Sherburne Avenue, with variance for minimum lot size; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution will be mailed by the
City Clerk to the applicant at 277 University Avenue, Saint Paul , Minnesota,
and to the Zoning Administrator.
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:
Yeas �mond Nays P1 anni ng nd Economi c Devel opment
�� _�. in Favor
Goswitz
Rettman �
s�ne;n�� _ Against BY
Sonnen
�'�n SEP � 01988 Form Appr ed by City ttorney
Adopted hy Council: Date
Certified Yas• y ouncil Se ry BY
sy
�+ p �
Approv iVlav DatP� _ J�r L i 1988 Approv y May mission to Council ;
. �\��
By — —
��,..,
Pll�.1SHED ��� � � i 198
�����
� � . � .�t� o12ss8 �
� PED DEPARTMENT . - - - --——
� orina a s 0 COIaTACT NA't�
� X PHONE
� DATE
ASS 1.� QR ROU�,�, (See reverse side.)
Department Directc,�r , � Mayor (or Assistant)
_ Finance and Manage t Services Director City Clerk
Budget n�rector � Council Research
� City Attorney _
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES: 1 (Clip all locations for signature.)
F1i�tAT WILL BB ACHIEQED B�TARING ACTION QN THE ATTACHED MATERIALS? �Purpose/Rationale)
;
Resolution implements City Council action of 8/25/88 grantinn a lot split with variance
to property located at 282 Sherburne Ave. Variance was required 6ecause divided lot
would have 4,69� sauare feet and the min�mum standard for tf�e zoninq district is 5,0�0
sqaare feet. � ''
RF�Ej ,
COS BENEI�IT. BIIDGETARY. AND PSRSONNE'js IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: ��D
�Ep r 1
N/A , C/T�,� � 988
. �`��ry�Y
FINANCING SOtTRCE AND BUDGET QCTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR .CREDITED:
(Mayor's signature not reqaxired if under $10,006.) RFCEfVEa
Total Amount of Transgction: N�A Activity �r0� 1988
Funding Source: , �AYpR•S�FF�C �
E
Councii Research Center
ATTACHMENTS: (List and nuatber all attachments.) �
1.Resolution SEP 0919��
2.staff report
3.surve,Y ____
4.map
ADI�IINISTRATIVE PROCEDiJ�
_Yes , No Rules, Regulations, Procedures, or Budge.t Amendment required?
_Yes _No If yes, are they or timetable attached?
DEPARTMENT REVIEW � CITY ATTORNEY REVIEFT
_Yes No Council resolution required? Resolution required� _Yes No
_Yes _No Insurance required? Insurance sufficient? ____Yes !No
�Yes No Insurance attached?
. C��-����
LOT SPLIT STAFF REPORT
FILE SBD #319
1. APPLICANT: Minnesota Auto Dealers Assoc. DATE OF HEARING: 8/25/88
2. LOCATION: 282 Sherburne Avenue (south side between Galtier � Farrington)
3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey
4. PRESENT ZONING: RT-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 67.703, 67.304 Subd. 1
5. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE: 8/11/88 BY: Donna Datsko
A. PURPOSE; To consider a lot split with variance to divide a single lot,
now 44' x 127.75' , to create a new lot 44' x 107.61' and a second piece
40 ' x 20' ; the smaller parcel would be �oined to the existing lot to
the south.
A variance is required because the new lot would be less than the
required RT-1 standard of 5,000 square feet (4,690 square feet) .
B. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This site contains a single family residence
and a detached garage. To the north and west are other low density
residential uses; to the south and east are primarily commercial uses.
C. FINDINGS:
1. Lot splits must meet six conditions as described in Section 67.304 of
the Zoning Code; these conditions are as follows:
1) The Zots have frontage on an existing improved street and access to
municipal services;
2) The lots to be divided are previouslp platted Iand;
3) The Iots meet the minimum standards for lot width and area for the
zoning district in which they are Zocated;
4) The division of the Zots sha11 not cause a remaining part of a 1ot to
become separately described tract which does not meet the minimum
standards of the zoning district in which it is Zocated or which does
not have street frontage and access to municipal services;
5) The division does not result in a split zoning classification on a
single 1ot;
6) The division does not result in the creation of a nonconforming
structure or use.
2. The applicant's proposal can meet all but conditions 3 and S. The new
lot will be below the minimum lot size of S,OUO square feet and the
division will create a split zoning district. The new, smaller parcel
is zoned RT-1 and it is to be joined with the southerly B-3 parcel. The
applicant does a have a rezoning petition before the city council
concurrent with this lot split application.
3. The City Council may grant a variance from the subdivision regulations
(for lot size) when compliance would create an unusual hardship, based
on six findings of Section 67.703. These requirements and the
applicant's ability to meet them with this current proposal are as
follows:
1) The intent of the (subdivision) chapter is met.
The intent of this chapter is to provide for the orderly, economic,
and safe development of land. The purpose of this split is to
provide an additional 800 square feet of land which will enable the
applicant to expand his building located to the south. The adjacent
lot to the east is of a similar size and configuration.
2) The granting of the variance wi11 not be detrimental to the public
safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property or
improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is Zocated.
This lot split would not be detrimental to the adjacent neighborhood.
, � ���i�'�
� SBD #319
Page 1`wo
3) The conditions upon which the request for a vsriance is based are
unique to the property for which the variance is sought and are
generally not applicab2e to other property.
This proposal is unique in that the building is on the property line
and there is no opportunity to expand except to reconfigure the lot
and include a portion to the north.
4) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights com�nonly enjoyed by other properties
in the same zoning district.
The lot to the east was divided in a similar manner.
5) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the
actions of the applicant.
6) Because of the particular natural surroundings, shape or
topographical conditions of the specific property involved, unusual
hardship to the owner wouZd result, as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience, if the strict Ietter of these regulations were carried
out.
The applicant would be unable to expand his building in the manner he
would like.
D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff findings, staff recommends approval
of this lot split with variance.
. � � ��=����
, • • :INCRK[ f�Itr�r�.�.q'frn't� ' � •
' i .�o.. -
..... ...M� . ___ ...._ • .
j� --♦
� , �'j 'l0� _ . , !Y�
� • I [wv�O Enlr� .I �- �
i i �1" i._
,.1 ,u.e � fn/ry .j '---�
� I 1
i �
I I � 1�.N
� ""
... � S • � _.. 1 NS
� I I x
,� � Y
� i +
i� t• � � �
� , � � .
_ I . 5• �
. R j� '- � �
_ �.� I . � � �
w.°.
�t � !t
. Il I .S SYIiK
� � i
i S/�ry
NORTNWESTERLY I ` NORTNEASTERLY
PARCEL PAFftEL
,.,
� ���. .
I
�
,`m
� to.4c - N- R�nr
.
i� :.-aa00... �� µ'ME ym.
��' 1 L
'� ..120.00... I
Ig .w.N't)'IG'E. �,_..- . , „�j
f i: ��. �/�T�j/��` � j� : , . ,�
` -`O i�d I.�....+�C Y0�lh' 2
. i :��eo�HrtSaur.-2C.CORHel�'yrs 2. ]irs• .y� �o
a r�j/� ° _ �+ j0 'w �'; y�o"
_ '4 •��'J" �0 � ^ ..j Ip n L ., Vr
' _�I '" � ^� , .
- F��� ? i �
S
� — �- --- -- - ---� -- �
�M — . . �C 9� �
". '' ' _
� ,
y )li
� a r
- , • , + "-
� � - ": SOUTHERLY PARGEI
_ fo
c �
�c �
�
19 ..
i
A •
� . � . . . . . . . . _ r . ... ._ � 14 Y
'•
1 \ IQ C`
� t li
i 1� �
54 XK I I`
I
�. �
' - i
. '�
��" ��
�
-�'�f'M..°�p,. . .. ....-. . _ :�-..�.....�L.'2�f'��irs�-L . . . _.. ..__.- ..✓ - _. :..:"....,:. .
,
r
, � , �
i � � � i
' t 1 ; I , , i ! I � �
,
' l:.i J ' r � :
.�. .. --T-r r �. .
� i 1-- - -- LL, , � ' I r:
� � 1 � , , ; ;
� ' ! ' W : ; � ; ! � � !
. �
---��Rtts - - - . � �- --- - _ _ . .. _ ---- --- - - - - - - --��-- - - -
� �' �'� �;� ° � �j� �, �� � j � � .� ���¢�r _�_ � 10 �
i ! � � � ' , � � � i
' � � Q ' j ' G. _'" ' O� t . ,
: G , , ,
�
' 'r�_4.�_ ' �
I O � ' ' � i 1 1 � � � j . . ,
I ' � . . 1 � � � 1
� �
O : . �J 1
OI O) O O � �O � ��� �'�;�;0 � �-O;O �� � O� ���; � V i V
; �
s��R�RNr'
,
o � �,o -0- v 0'��C �� � � ;,�(�_
� �.� '
0 0 �
, ,
.
. ^ � , • � . `� � • ^ ��' �
• �
� uN�V�.=R��T�( --- _ . � _-- - - -- � � -
� � v
. ;
• � • P � • t+_L_
� ---
y �P v � �� o � � � ��- a o ����I ° �_
�
..Z _
� � ' � , � o S P
, o ,
I � � ; �) .
.� � , , .
, , , „ � �
� —
I �
O O � � � ¢ t �� �� � ���
Z � �
� � FVLLLr rL
OC e n�
> � � �
� O � � � O � �
_ � •r �2 �
O O �2 �2 i2 i2 i2 ,
O O i. .�.- -`---�►-.- --�-. -r.-, :- ; �r.--r-----y , , �
°J . � �` � � •�I f '". �, r. F
g � 6 - ' ' ' ' ' � � r'• % • �,'. : � .
. O I � ' ` ' ' r • ' �'. ' ' r� � •t� -,�.
9 ° ���6:�� � �t��� � ��► �3 .
O6 , , • y . , � ��.�.�..� �
� O O �� ___.._----f - -- - - -� - - ��- - �---1,-'/-- '
AREA MAP
APPLICANT m�' ��� �ea ��C• LEGEND
����I�G S - ZONING OISTRICT 80UNOARY
PURPOSE
e20h �' W� �-� •a•� , Y////�+ SUBJECT PROPERTY
'� �X�0.� O�ii��!e. �W►�►�� � ir�i E �A�vi i LY p�/�NMNG
� �1STRICT
��3Z3 TWO FAMILY
FILE N0. �
.7� ,�� � � MULTIPLE FAMiLY
�ATE � O
• � � COMMERCIAL
LAND USE
SCALE � i�� = 200� NORTH � � � �NDUSTRIA� MAP N0.
SAINT PAUL PLANNING DIVISION V VACANT
� , GlTY � • , �,�� � .
� ��� ��� '�
o a CITY OF SAINT PAUL
, ��„����°,�, ,, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
vm "�� �� � �r' DIVISION OF PLANNING
25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102
+ea•
612-228-3270
GEORGE LATIMER RECEIVED
MAYOR
august 2z, �9ss AUG 2 21988
C1TY CLERK
Albert Olson, City Clerk
Room 386, City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
RE: Subdivision File #319, Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association
City Council Hearing: August 25, 1988
PURPOSE: To review a lot split with variance for property located on the south
side of Sherburne between Galtier and Farrington Street.
STAFF RECONIl�IENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
Dear Sir:
Attached please find the application, survey and staff report for the Minnesota
'� Auto Dealers Association lot split with variance. This application has
completed all the required city department reviews at this time and is in
compliance with city subdivision standards with the exception of lot size.
The applicant plans to separate off a piece of land 20' x 40' and attach it to
the property to the south. The larger piece will accommodate an expanded
office and storage building. The remaining lot, 4,690 square feet, contains a
single family residence but with the split it will no longer meet the 5,000
square foot lot size standard.
This lot split is to be heard in conjunction with a rezoning for the split
portion of land. Rezoning is necessary to eliminate a split zoning
classification (RT-1/B-3) which would result if the property were split but not
rezoned.
Sincerely,
� �� ►-J�l<<'A'�
Donna Datsko
City Planner
DD:ws
Attachments
�
;, �'�- i�/�
�� • �
IIKLICATION FOR SU6DIYISION REYIEY
, CI7Y Of SAINT PAtA SUBDIYISION REVIEM f �� �
:���.���
PROJECT NAME Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association Subdiwision
OESCRIPTI4N OF PROJECT Change in the division and legal description of two properties.
PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1. 277 University Avenue 2. 282 Sherburne Avenue
IEGAI DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See attached sheet. .
APPL ICANT James Schutjer C�'PANY Minnesota Automobile Dealers Associat�
ADDRESS 277 University Avenue, St. Paul (Zjp� 55103 PHONE (612) 291-2400
TYP E OF DIVISION: (Check one)
LOT SPLIT � PLAT: Preliminary Final Combined
RLS (4 or Fewer Tracts) (Five or More Tracts)
APPLICAN?'S SIGNATURE y* DATE ,1une 21, 1988
FEE PAID S �� CITY AGENT��.��-��J�-
V A�r�?�n e�e fay l.Of h�c. — wu n,i ww�,w► �. Soa�qb , y�9 0 � �K y�f-
ssssssa:ssraassssasx=a=xxsa=zasacxasss- s:snaa=ssaasa=s=asassxaassasosaaa=xzaxa:aaaz=sa�=
OFfICE USE ONLY
PLNG DIST �_ LANO USE �_ ZONING �� HISTORY �v3Z3 TAX MAP �_
� � PLANS DIS7RIBUTED �"Z �' �� RETURN BY � � 5-45 Ss
REVIEWED BY COh4�lENTS
(continue on back)
IVED
ssssaasas:azzzsa=__-z=csa�ssr=sx=as=ssssna==ssnsssIIaasasaszsaaasssrsszas:�sasss:zszssm
JUN 2 21988
fOR STAFF USE ONLY
Legal Notice Published Z�N�NG
City Council Hearing
Date Approved/Der�ied 7/1/85
� � � �
ATTACHMENT TO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
Minnesota Automobile Dealers Association
277 University Avenue
Current Legal Description: Proposed Legal Description:
Lots 13 , 14 and 15 and the Lots 13 , 14 and 15 and the
South 20.00 feet of Lots 2 South 20.00 feet of Lots 2,
and 3 , all in Block 2 , 3 and 4 , all in Block 2 ,
CHAMBERS ADDITION, Ramsey CHAMBERS ADDITION, Ramsey
County, Minnesota. County, Minnesota
282 Sherburne Avenue
Current Legal Description: Proposed Legal Description:
Lot 4 and that portion of That part of Lot 4 and the
the West 4 .00 feet of Lot West 4 .00 feet of Lot 3,
3, Block 2 , CHAMBERS Block 2, CHAMBERS ADDITION,
ADDITION, Ramsey County, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
Minnesota, which lies north which lies north of the
of the South 20 .00 feet of South 20. 00 feet of said
said Lot 3. Lots 3 and 4.
�ECE11/�D
JUN 22 �988
ZONlNG
�,r_
r ��1�
. . c J r, �:J �—_.
�• • `
LOT SPLIT STAFF REPORT
FILE SBD #319
1. APPLICANT: Minnesota Auto Dealers Assoc. DATE OF HEARING: 8/25/88
2. LOCATION: 282 Sherburne Avenue (south side between Galtier � Farrington)
3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey
4. PRESENT ZONING: RT-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 67.703, 67.304 Subd. 1
S. STAFF INVESTIGATION & REPORT: DATE: 8/11/88 BY: Donna Datsko
A. PURPOSE: To consider a lot split with variance to divide a single lot,
now 44' x 127.75' , to create a new lot 44' x 107.51' and a second piece
40 ' x 20' ; the smaller parcel would be �oined to the existing lot to
the south.
A variance is required because the new lot would be less than the
required RT-1 standard of 5,000 square feet (4,690 square feet) .
B. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This site contains a single family residence
and a detached garage. To the north and west are other low density
residential uses; to the south and east are primarily commercial uses.
C. FINDINGS:
1. Lot splits must meet six conditions as described in Section 67.304 of
the Zoning Code; these conditions are as follows:
1) The lots have frontage on an existing improved street and access to
municipal services;
2) The Zots to be divided are previously platted 1and;
3) The Zots meet the minimum standards for 1ot width and area for the
zoning district in which they are Zocated;
4) The division of the lots sha11 not cause a remaining part of a Zot to
become separately described tract which does not meet the minimum
standards of the zoning district in which it is Iocated or which does
not have street frontage and access to municipal services;
5) The division does not result in a split zoning classification on a
single Zot;
6) The division does not result in the creation of a nonconforming
structure or use.
2. The applicant's proposal can meet all but conditions 3 and 5. The new
lot will be below the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet and the
division will create a split zoning district. The new, smaller parcel
is zoned RT-1 and it is to be joined with the southerly B-3 parcel. The
applicant does a have a rezoning petition before the city council
concurrent with this lot split application.
3. The City Council may grant a variance from the subdivision regulations
(for lot size) when compliance would create an unusual hardship, based
on six findings of Section 67.703. These requirements and the
applicant's ability to meet them with this current proposal are as
follows:
-�� ' ,
SBD #319
Page T�ao
3) The conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are
unique to the property for which the variance is sought and are
generally not applicable to other property.
This proposal is unique in that the building is on the property line
and there is no opportunity to expand except to reconfigure the lot
and include a portion to the north.
4) The Iiteral interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties
in the same zoning district.
The lot to the east was divided in a similar manner.
5) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from [he
actions of the applicant.
6) Because of the particular natural surroundings, shape or
topographical conditions of the specific property involved, unusual
hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere
inconvenience, if the strict Ietter of these regulations were carried
out.
The applicant would be unable to expand his building in the manner he
would like.
D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on staff findings, staff recommends approval
of this lot split with variance.
� , ,;�;� �' �- ���i�
�- ,
, . ____�
ST. PAUL CITY COUNCI�
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Z O N I N G RECEIVED
AUG 161988
CITY CLERK
To: Property owners within 350' ;
Representatives of Planning District 7 FIL E N 0. SBD 319
PAGE
PURPOSE To rQView a Lot S�lit with Variance for minimum lot size.
An RT-1 (residential one and two family) zoned property
requires 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot; proposed split would
result in lot 4,690 square feet. Split protion would be
joined with existing southerly lot.
LOCATION
282 Sherburne Avenue (southside between Galtier and
Farrin ton)
PETITIONER p1INNESOTA AUTO��OBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION
H E A R I N G Thursday, August 25, �9ss g:oo. A.M.
� Cit CAUncil Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House
Q U E S TIO N S Zoning 29s-4154 (Donna Datsko)
Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, �
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, MinnesoLa 55102
Legal Description: On file
Note: This hearing and review will coincide with the hearing
and review for rezoning the split (20' x 44' ) .parcel
from RT-1 to B-3.
Notice •ent 8/10/88
�T�� - � "'t
���.
ST: � �PAUL CITY COUNCIL
PUB� IC HEARiNG NOTICE
ZONING -
To: Property owners within 350' ; FIL E N 0 SBD
Representatives of Planning District 7 • 319
PAGE
P U R P 0 S E To review a Lot Solit with Variance for minimum lot size.
An RT-1 (residential one and two family) zoned property
requires 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot; proposed split would
result in lot 4,690 square feet. Split protion would be
joined with existing southerly lot.
LOCATION
282 Sherburne Avenue (southside between Galtier and
Farrin ton)
P E T I T 10 N E R p1INNESOTA AUTOMOBILE OEALERS ASSOCIATION
H E A R IN G Thursday, August 25, �9ss 9:00_ A.M.
. Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House
Q U E S T10 N S Zoning 29s-4154 (Donna Datsko)
Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic
Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex,
25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesoia 55102
Legal Description: On file
Note: This hearing and review will coincide with the hearing
and review for rezoning the split (20' x 44' ) parcel
from RT-1 to B-3.
Notice sent 8/10/88
��" �'��si�
f�'F; �B:R'� y(�` ..
` i.c,yt
- :; , ' '�, i��^���i.A 'E9A(i'`�"*: {�1w.^b.t� tl �'#'�'
$�' ` . �o��ti
v w,�.: �+u�t.�'i. , '-
`�.. _ -.. �_ ,. ; :r...�r.=+ys�Y,.F3*�r :. �- '��, ..i
. � �`a" a.t�a sv �� . � � ..
�'.� �Stk'P� �s� +��'
����. �
, �.
� �� �f'It973�-.t' `tjf3}L a !sy#: �Y6llh d3�?�?.. �.� :N`:i ?r f��`���'.
' t:�i�, �:.. " . t:�y(y}y�/�p��'� :�-,r rf.�t'?3 ,�a•e+y... �y. ..,,-s„ £ �� . . .
..:T'iTl,.,�. ��35�Fi;P16�'fS't�i.'Y'w��J%r4 7 4r.Bi3#}('.,;�Y
h�' �' :° ' . - �°s°�`Q t..�Cr;: � Ct �V��..pt2`3 �3�;fi �h:� J 1 r�,� � � ��,y
� .. �<:��`a�k . va -�_ r x�c..a,g at -i�:�a�a �C�
�!'+:�:+a3 els�r�"t�JYa,ti3ci�+cr4, �5�i*,- t -sa sg�z T
.� _. . . .� .. ._. . . ' �i��'s�7`.. ..:f�.cz� °�f..._.7+ rs:e t��:�.