The URL can be used to link to this page

88-1444 WHITE - CITV CLERK COI�IICII PINK - FINANCE G I TY O F SA I NT PA U L CANARV - DEPARTMENT � /��// BLUE - MAVOR File NO. � Council Resolution -_�� Presented By �� _ r Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PARK RIDGE ADDITION WHEREAS, Battle Creek Association, Ltd., has submitted the attached proposed final plat for City Council approval ; and WHEREAS, the appropriate city departments have reviewed the proposed plat and found it to meet the requirements of Chapter 67 of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing before the City Council was duly published in the official newspaper of the city and notices were mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 of the subject property; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council was held on August 11 , 1988, where all interested parties were heard, the Council having considered all the facts and recorr�nendations concerning the plat; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council accepts and approves the final plat for Park Ridge Addition. COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Dimond Plannin and Economic D elo ment �� [n Favor Goswitz Rettman �be1�� Against BY Sonnen � SEP — 1 �8 Form Ap r ed by City At orney Adopted by Council: Date Certified �'a.; ed by Council Secreta� BY ,�� / � By, �,.� ��.�.=�.�� . e`-L�_��__:e-:�.i Approved 'Nav . S E P — v � _ Appro b Mayor f Submissio to Council B �. � BY Y P�6�� S t P 17 1988 8��y�y � _N° 012865 � PED DEPARTMENT � Donna Datsko CONTACT NAME %3395 PHONE � 8/16/88 DATE ASSIGN NUMBER FOR xOUTING bRDER: (See reverse side.) � Department Director ,� Mayor (or Assistant) _ Finaace� and I�Ianagement Services Director � City Clerk Budget D�reCtOr _L� C:rn�nri l Rasxparrh ,'� City Attorney _ TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATtTRE PAGES: �_ (Clip all locations for signature.) WHAT WILL BE ACHIEVED BY �.AKING ACTION ON THE ATTACHED MAT$RIALS? (Purpose/Rationale) , : Resolution implements the Council's action of 8/11/88 roved a finai plat for the Park Ridge Addition, located on the west side of Batt�Road a�d north of wacated Florence Street. The plat creates 11 single familyAx,e��ntj,a„l lots on a cul-de-sac. U l� lyff�3 MAYOR'S OFFICE COSTlBENEFIT. BUDGETARY. AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS ANTICIPATED: ��D N�A : Au c� t�r �ss8 �� ► �� ► �� c��I EY �INANCING SODRCE AND BUD�ET ACTIVITY NUMBER CHARGED OR CREDITED: (Mayor's signature not r�equired if under $10,000.) Total Amount of Trans�ction: Activi�y Number: Fu�ding Source: Gounci! Research Center ATTACHMENTS: (List and nwnber all attachments.) AUG 191988 Ipage resolution . copy of plat . staff report and area map ADMINISTRATInE PROCEDURES ' Yes _No Rules, Regulations, Procedures, or Budget Amendmen� required? „_Yes _No If yes, are they or timetable attached? DEPARTMENT REVIEW CITY ATTORNLY REVIEW a _Yes _No Council resolution required? Resolution required? _Yes _No _Yes ____No Insurance required? Insuraace -sufficient? _Yes _No Yes No Insurance attached? . . ��_,�� , ' ° PLAT STAFF REPORT FILE #284 1. APPLICANT: Battle Creek Association, Ltd. DATE OF HEARING: 8-11-88 2. LOCATION: West side of Battle Creek Road at vacated Florence 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey 4. PRESENT ZONING: R-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 67.405; 67.406 5. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 7-13-88 BY: Donna Datsko A. PURPOSE: To consider final plat approval for Park Ridge Addition. The proposed plat will create 11 new single-family lots; ten lots will face a new cul-de-sac named Park Ridge Court and one lot will front onto Battle Creek Road. B. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This property has a steep grade change located in approximately the middle third of the site (toward vacated Florence) which can be accommodated in the layout of the structures. Battle Creek Park is located to the south and northwest and other ad�acent property is also zoned R-1. C. REOUIRED FINDINGS: 1. A11 the applicable provisions of the Legislative Code are compIied wi[h. Staff review is completed for the subdivision and site' plan and the development can meet required city standards. 2. The proposed subdivision wi11 not be detrimental to the present and potential surrounding Zand uses. Single family residences on lots of at least 9,600 square feet are consistent with existing development in the area. 3. The area surrounding the subdivision can be planned and developed in coordination and compatibility with the proposed subdivision. Most of the surrounding area is now developed; the subdivision is compatible with surrounding land uses. 4. The subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan housing policy 1-4 states that "Every new development will be planned and designed to enhance and complement existing neighborhood character. New development should not simply add to but should improve and strengthen what exists." The development of executive-style homes in this area both enhances and complements existing residential development. 5. The subdivision preserves and incornnratoc rt,a �;�e�.. ;�...-------� --- -�- - - RIDGE ADDITION _ �� PARK �� J SCALE: 1 INCH =40 FEET SCALE IN FEET —Zr— f I" J � C,� � 2� �� 8� �20 �g0 20� � � �b � ..��-.?-„�„ E ° ^ � � � W �ti .�.^.. Z � 2 �Z O O INDICATES IRON SET AND PLUG IDENTIFIED BV REG. NO. 148B7 � � I Z;N o BEARINOS AFE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM x �z F ' I o , - - - LOCATED IN THE NW114 OF SW 1/4 OF SEC. 2.T.28.R•22 0 o LL W ti z m �aW �r � � �� -o ��n o a _ N89�30'S3"W ' 120.00 _�?.00_ ;. ;; WEST LINE EAST i 120 PT. l0T 7 - � � . i I ' � � ( o0 1 1 i o I I l � �� i � ' �- �SOUTH LINE l0T 7 � � � I ' t � � � N89°30'53'W ZZZ.S.3 '- NB9�30'S3�w �zo.00 � . - - — 102.63 eo.00 eo.00 so.00 i ,. i Q 0 � , � � � i 1. r ^ g 1 � 0 C K � , �,.--� � . � G� '� ._.� . � y 1 O �I J o� y 7 i .. . g =o g =o ; N ; � o� m 3eo �� o , o a„ � '' r� oj o . '��s. �o ' o: �� . �� eoi. _^ _� _� t � F � � .. � 1' F� �r�(rr � p�ae°?6�?'- - -�d°s o � � N m S f,N � .yo� �, e t �i CO fpt .�'•\ .�, • I ., Vt��'�Nt i �p o 6 R=80.00 Je03 B?J. � �t��SE�� 0 / I♦� h/� \�'_-_�___'__ _______ _" L_- - _-_- ' _' . ° y�� `p 36.24 80.00 80.00 .... � ," o .N - - S89'30'30'E 195.24 -- a2 _ _ � �;� v7 ,52 . D Ng9_ Op - He9'3o 3o•E ° " °° PARK RIDGE COURT o - :V _. ti 93.58 '� . _� Bp ,, 'q� 00 S � ' � '•°2•F�� Nee°ao'so•w �ss.s� - �raoo' 35.67 � BO.00 . 80.00 + � _ _ _ __ __ -_ f- .r��' ----- -I---- ------ - - - - \. . Q s_. 0 s. ' �p. 2 � � A=325.42 ��i Z� F� �r� 5 . SF. ��r. ,�`5} P��y . .,sN r _ . eg , r � G_,9- ----' �D _ N . � � ��9�2i• . . _�o _.� - po .. � �.o �l0 1 v _ ��e f N o 5 0;,; 2 �;� ; � p o F,i �lm m�- n;- - .. �O n ,j�,�a � v�ii� � i ; � .._.. m N ^ °�A;. �. ' e� � j ' t SOUTH LINE LOT 8 _ _ ' _ _ _ � .._' ___ --' - r�' ---'- - - --� __- _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ '_- . . - --�. _ _ ' ' 30 FT. DHAINAGE 6 . . . � ; ".,.. ..`. .. .... _'.-� i . UTIUTV EASEMENT � � �� I E0.00 BO.00 � � 33.00 2325 710.�a 80.00 '----- - - --_ S89°30'30'E 403.69 .� Y �, RECEIVED APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION RE I --, , .. � CITY OF SAINT PAUL SEP 81987 SUBDIYISION REYIEW # -"� � :�_��:�_��:��::�� ___ ZONING PROJECT NAME Park Ridg,� A�di tion DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 11 Lot sing] e fami�v housinQ subrli�; �i�n PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION Adj, to Batt�e Creek Road [al F1c�rent�e Avr�_ Platt.P�l LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (See Attachea) APPLICANT Donna M. Stangler CONPANY Battle Creek Assoc. , Ltd. ADDRESS 11095 Viking Drive, Eden Prairie (ZIP) 55344 PHONE 944-1996 TYPE OF DIVISION: (Check one) LOT SPLIT PLAT: Preliminary Final Combined x RLS (4 or Fewer Tracts) __ RLS (Five or More Tracts) X APPLICANT'S SIGNATUR � '� ' �� .-� DATE roZ � �, 1 '� � ' r FEE PAID $'� �$10/Lotx12)+(200+($5x11 )+$65(Final)+ CITY A6ENT � �� 4-ii -��-�--�� --��-��.iE�t� _i s==s=a==ss=a=a=S=��-m�aasn==sa=�=aasaaaszszsaassaaaaaazasxa=�sx�aaaaazaass:sssassaas:aa:a OFFICE USE ONLY � PLNG DIST �_ LAND USE ? L ZONING � __1 HISTORY 1';� "-f?= TAX MAP i -� �' PLANS DISTRIBUTED ``� - �% ' � ' RETURN BY ` � - ! = � � � REVIEWED BY CONMENTS (continue on back) :ssaz=:�aasa=ss=sncxxe��na=aa�nn=mmzaaa�=ssas�=ssaaamo=a=ss=�s=an=�a=mzassaasszsaazss:z:a FOR STAFF USE ONIY Legal Notice Published _ City Council Hearing Date Approved/Denied 7/1/85 �%� - �� PLAT STAFF REPORT - �� FILE #284 l. APPLICANT: Battle Creek Association, Ltd. DATE OF HEARING: 8-11-88 2. LOCATION: West side of Battle Creek Road at vacated Florence � � 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey 4. PRESENT ZONING: R-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 67.405; 67.406 5. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 7-13-88 BY: Donna Datsko � roval for Park Ridge Addition. 1'he A, pURPOSE: To consider final plat app proposed plat willa�keRid e1Courtsandlonealotywillsfront onto BattleaCreeknRoad. cul-de-sac named P g B. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This property has a steep grade change located in approximately the middle third of the site (toward vacated Florence) which can be accommodated in the ls�°and other adjacentepropertylisCalso zo ediR-located to the south and northwe C. REQUIRED FINDINGS: 1. A1l the applicable provisions the�subdi�isionland s�te8planoandltheWdevelopment Staff review is completed for can meet required city standards. 2. The proposed subdivisian will not be detrimental to the present and potential surrounding land uses. Single family residences on lots of at least 9,600 square feet are consistent with existing development in the area. 3. The area surrounding the subdivision can be os�subdi�ision1oPed in coordination and compatibility with the prop Most of the surrounding area is now developed; the subdivision is compatible with surrounding land uses. 4. The subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan housing policy 1-4 states that "Every new development will be planned and designed to enhance and complement existing neighborhood character. New development should not simply add to but should improve and - strengthen what exists." The development of executive-style homes in this area both enhances and complements existing residential development. S. The subdivision preserves and incorporates the site's important existing natural features, whenever possible. The southerly lots on this site will have structures with walk-out lower levels; this design element incorporates the slope changes in the area. 6. A1I land intended for builoods Serosionn continuously1hightwateretableerse�eree residents by peril from fI , soil conditions or other menace. The land can be safely developed. 7 . The subdivision ��ude then acated Flo enceWStreetbincludeldrainage andeutilety ihe iozs whicn incl easements as required by the city's Sewer Division. E. STAFF RECOI�Il'�IENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends approval of the Park Ridge Addition final plat. I �..��,►„�u�u� � - ' ` ` � I File �10311 Page Two MOVED BY: zimniewicz ` SECONDED BY: Maddox ; IN FAVOR: s AGAINST: o ' MAILED: June 29, 1988 I I I , TIME LIMIT: No order of the Board of Zoaing Appeats permittinQ the erection or � slteration of a build[ng or off-street parking facility ahall be valid for a period lon�er than one year, unless a butldin� permit for such erection or alterstion is obta�ned within such period and such erection or alteratioa is proceedjn� pursuant to the terms of such permit. The Bosrd of Zonia� Appeals or the City Councit may �rant an extenslon not to exceed oae year. In �ranting such extension, the Board of Zoning Appeals may decide to hold i publlc hearing. PA PEAL: Decjsjoas o! the Board of ZoninQ Appeals are final subject to appeal to the City Counctl within 15 days by anyone affected by tl�e decision. CERTIFICATION: I, the underslgned Secretiry to the Board of Zoning Appeals for the City o! Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foreEoing copy with the origlnal record in my office; and find the sanne te be � true and corrRCt cory of eA�d �►rigtnaei ��d of the whole thereof, as based on approved minutes of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals meeting held on June 28, 1988 and on record in the Saint Psul Planning Division Office, 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paui, hiinaesota. SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ��i; � � � , � ,1�� , 'r-""`f"'�- � � .""------------ Secretary to the Board . , . . ��- �� PLAT STAFF REPORT FILE #284 1. APPLICANT: Battle Creek Association, Ltd. DATE OF HEARING: 8-11-88 2. LOCATION: West side of Battle Creek Road at vacated Florence 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey 4. PRESENT ZONING: R-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: 67.405; 67.406 S. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: 7-13-88 BY: Donna Datsko A. PURPOSE: To consider final plat approval for Park Ridge Addition. The proposed plat will create 11 new single-family lots; ten lots will face a new cul-de-sac named Park Ridge Court and one lot will front onto Battle Creek Road. B. SITE & AREA CONDITIONS: This property has a steep grade change located in approximately the middle third of the site (toward vacated Florence) which can be accommodated in the layout of the structures. Battle Creek Park is located to the south and northwest and other adjacent property is also zoned R-1. C. REOUIRED FINDINGS: l. A11 the applicable provisions of the Legislative Code are complied with. Staff review is completed for the subdivision and site plan and the development can meet required city standards. 2. The proposed subdivision wi11 not be detrimental to [he present and potential surrounding Iand uses. Single family residences on lots of at least 9,600 square feet are consistent with existing development in the area. 3. The area surrounding the subdivision can be planned and developed in coordination and compatibility with the proposed subdivisioa. Most of the surrounding area is now developed; the subdivision is compatible with surrounding land uses. 4. The subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan housing policy 1-4 states that "Every new development will be planned and designed to enhance and complement existing neighborhood character. New development should not simply add to but should improve and strengthen what exists." The development of executive-style homes in this area both enhances and complements existing residential development. S. The subdivision preserves and incorporates the site's important existing natural features, whenever possible. The southerly lots on this site will have structures with walk-out lower levels; this design element incorporates the slope changes in the area. 6. A11 land intended for building sites can be used safely without endangering the residents by peril from floods, erosion, continuously high water table, severe soil conditions or other menace. The land can be safely developed. 7. The subdivision can be economically sezved with public facilities and services. The iocs whicn inciude �he vacated Florence street include drainage and utility easements as required by the city's Sewer Division. E. STAFF RECOIrIIrIENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends approval of the Park Ridge Addition final plat. . ��"/�� PARK RIDGE ADDITION J SCALE: 1 INCH =40 PEET SCALE IN FEET --�-�or— . .�• 160 200 � 3 � � p 20 40 80 120 i � m , 0 �!l�6+�riCy E ;n w . � +. t W �H f .�`�.. Z 2 � = O O INDICATES IRON SET AND PLUG IOENTIFIED BY REG. NO. 14887 � o I Z;ry s BEAR�NGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM s �_� ` F SW1/4 OF SEC. 2.T.28.R.22 Q LL I � � - — LOCATED IN TME NW��4 � p o "W� z m �Q W '�: � � � pp v/ ;O :m _ N89��30'S3'W ' 120.00 a3.00_y. _ i WEST LINE EAST � ! t20 FT. l0T 7 -- - 1 � � I � I � ... ~0 � 0 � OO � � i °o � . N� �, i �� rSOUTM LINE LOT 7 � i . \ . i � � � N89°30'S3'W ZZZ.S.3 '- NB9�30'S3•w izo.00 � -- — — 102.63 eo.00 so.00 eo.00 � . � � o � � � A� �� . , K � ; ,. � C ' P�,�r.- � B � � � �. . ; .� � I�� ... . 8 ' s �o ; ; W p y 7 =o zo � o � o f�j 9 �i S♦ F�. �o � 0 �e ~� • ¢� a N ' N � � � Y (7 0 �!�f. �p Of Z� � + �r � �@�i, _ " Z� 1 ^ . � F � i 1- .. ; �0' \ °10�2�_ _ ��IIIIII N f/T , -�8 � 4, � � N fqSF�<�T� \, ��tiO j5 ;r�sB o . I ```t`I � m m . 6 EHT ��',�,'%= R=80.00 �B'g3��s. ! �o' SEM�`N� ' . O : � � . i I � �'' � . � ,ti�� \`---- ------ - ------ --Y--- ---- - -' m � � • 36.24 80.00 BO.00 . � y�/h o . i�.- - S89'30'30'E 195.24 .-_ . :o ' ;� ^ ,52 0, � � a N65" 00 ' D N89�30'30'E ° � °° PARK RIDGE COURT o � N , O -� �y 33.58 � _ g �o 'q� �:DO S � � ';- �•°2 g N89°30'30'W 195.87 o�W 35.67 i BO.�C i 80_00 -_ —_ F ° � _ _ _ _ _ _ _` . � a�� '_'_' �____ __"' a• _ O s � �p.� 2 � A=325.42 51 e�i2� ��SF T��r �A\S,.e ; 'P .y� . . MF�TY � _. � . - Q;dgo`— _`� ��J . .. . N . . �92i . o � . =tC C C �� o �o N o 5 _ a,� 2 �� 1 ; ° - 0 0 �, : ��m �- n�- - - o � .^0 4 N� 3 ; � � v� � �'' . , i 5� � i ! , ;� , SOU7h+ l1NElOTB ' _ _ �` _ _ - __ _'_ _ '_ _.r�_ _____ _ _ _'� . —__— - _ __ _ __ _._ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ._. � _ j�.> . . . . .._ l . �30 FT. ORAINAGE � V + UTILITV EASEMENT BO.00 80.00 80.00 � � _33_00 _ 23.25 ta0.�a . .. " -� S89 30'30'E 403.69 - 1 , � : , . - - , • . - . , -- � _ ,� �� .- . _.. . . . - . � o� •o !m Oi - - i z _ Sl3D � LS`1 l �. � `� .}�# � ' � ' ` �"' _`-;� ''� � L"'� � O � � ��o ..� � y ., -� �� . ESEATZ � .^ �3 �, "� �� ' � .�� •y •.;� '� � � f� 'S„ .� , �� .�, �� ; .� ,� '� '•� '` �f � b O � � � � ' � �' ' � � ` �� • !Z• � � ,� � ,t,�t':�j � • 0 ! h/� "" �t3� � Ci ��' f �� J J , ,:� � • A S� �J ♦:, � � f/(= � � , Z � �� •. ��y .a 'i�; �. �� •;, V � � �: �- � �� f°�ra � .:�� .� .'� � Si�T�il.%�'•�' � � � �,►° � �'j �`•.� °',.. 4%� '•�` -3 �3 /� ;+� =� �'� ' � � t� �/�!� t �•� A ' O � � //�� V_ w � ' � •� •� � `• • •' � � � �� _�!` � .s�`� i^..� � � 4� ,7 � � �� S � � � N u �-1 �., ('.' `�' �'"' ti'' � �� • `��• O � �w ., `' .. . � � � ' �.� � � .1 � f'!s • • � � _ � •� �► � — — — — � ..� . ; �' _ �as+ M , ��-� �''+ � � �j � � � < < �'�+ �. �1 • � �� ^ 3 '� y , �� .y � � C _ , �. �_ � � ^ - '' �'� �,,� w� M� 3 � •� '' .r� � j ` • ', ^, ?'? f�� '+ 'a �^ �"; ��•� � �J � , . b, ., • .. - � .� , q A 0 Q "7 � ',�. .: � 'r ° E� ^ � . � ��. f �3 �.�, � � M� •� :r �✓ � � � � � � . �s r i`� ` i L � y� � ��~` � � (j' �" Q � � . / � FJ � ' `^ f^'/� ' . i � r' ,. ,;. - r �.. �.. �y�;' �,;•�.�. �,,� �� O � � � 4 _ � �•' �� : � f. �, �r , �- �- � � � �' � � S� � � - ��' E ~ '' � ' � ► � � f� �� `� � � � �'}� (� �c'� j� G ;, �,-,, �T� � � �,,j � � ° ' �^, " „ .�-. �;' ��e�. � �.� � `-� � ' r. � �i,,, f,� c; ,�„ t.� j�� r �, `�: � V:J " f. ti .. �-- ti � r� ... �' �; •, r'3 ' Y V' � � � � �C1 . , � � �, r � j� �v �- . � �! ��•'•� � i . ., �" �"� � � E.: , ' , € ' '`•� W �1, � �i {;• � ��, �, ,.,�, . 3 �' �, %�• ,, . -��.;,, W r� � �� . ,.., �, �'? �"', � . S ("� L ,. � • �� . • • '.. (-- `", � �: � �=� U ,�,►? �j � � , E" ;". �;� . tr�► Y`✓ ,-� ..., ` t'� � r.: � � � ` r�, � �; �,� , �. . � - �� ., L , � � � �� ' . � � f �^? r p :� .f !� L- c• t. : � . .� "� � _ ;� �.•�..• f�, �• c .--� W � �j � �'' 'L:rs �+�G /� t^ r\. �T �" , {�' ` `~�;• , � Ci .. . �. . �� - �, �: ��Cr�� 't,� � � F- C� � � � '� ` � �� F � S ��' � E. '^ �. �. f. 1j � � � ,f� � ~ � L' �� t l, , <✓ ,�; � '� � .t,'•! : ' , c�.. � 'Vl //T� > /!•�� ,�,' � �� {+l)' � E. �- ��'�� 4! � �� a� ' cr`�j G� �' �� ` " ..�' �. t `. � � � � � � �,,,3 . . .; `� . � � �. � <., � ,_ � . , �� . � � � , � � � �-. �_. � -� �� fi � � � � �� .'� . �_ -..._, < � � �� a � � � �� - .� � �,' ,., : _ o �� ' P� � �, "� �°' � � � � . , r6 � � � � �' � . : = . � � � � �� 3� �'' c� � � .� �� .":_ .� , `� ��'� � M �� `� � `� � , � $RA sE r �, � � � � ,, . . . �� c� � `�� P�� 'c�a � � � � a� r � � w� � r,�� .- ._ j�_ i �� COl/N � � ��, � i`� �+ . =3� = ° � �� ,� q �}b�j � � c,� � ` �� i � � � � � c� � � P.�j � �j � ��i- -- P OPE T Y � o� , - � � . . � . � . . , f�j � "� tv`� C7� .; , � .• t�.� '�•. `. 4� r. r� � � � '' v -�j�"' W � � � � :; �., - r �,.,,�" �^f^��,�' �� ,,,,. �� _ � � -�j� � t� � t� c� t"� '•i L.', , �� ` �^ ��., I�� '� CJ ' �� •� ,., � � ± �-; �^+ c' � � � �� ►� � !'3 `� y =��y�, � � �.s��,� '� � � . �.') � .. E��, . ;, E� c•� F f.-,, �: �� t � ' £, j�., � �' ��',�_�"�, -�• � _�_.t. ,�-�� ,! %� � .s•'�7 1�'1 4Y �� n. _� A � .0. � :+ �- � AREA MAP APPLICANT Barn�- �'R'��-�` • LT� LEGEND - ZONING OISTRICT BOUN�ARY � SUBJECT PROPERTY PURPOSE �� p��r �� _ O ONE FAMIIY PLANMING 1 DISTRICT Q TWO FAMILY F I LE N 0. S�D� Zg�! � O MULTIPLE FAMILY OATE ��zC.�►.�. : � I t $�l �� • � n COMMERCIAL LAND USE SCALE � I'�= 200� NORTH � �� NDUSTRIAL MAP N0. SAINT PAUL PLANNING DIVISION V VACANT . (� � CITY OF SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS RESOLUTION . ZONING FILE NUMBER: �03�� - DATE: Jun� zs, �9ss . WHEREAS, Duane Simpson has applied for a variance from the strict appiication of the provisions of Section 62.114.1 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to side yard setback for an above ground swimming pool in the R-4 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing on June 28, 1988, pursuant to said appeal in accordance with the requirements of Section 62.204 of the Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals based upon evidence presented at the public hearing, as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings of fact: 1. Duane Simpson, the applicant, purchased an above ground pool from United Merchandising. It was installed in the back yard this year without the required City permit. 2. The pool measures 24' x 16'. It is set at the rear of the back yard between the garage and the side Iot line. It is 4' from thc garage and 4' from the sidc lot line. It cannot be moved any closer to the garage under the Building Code. Given the sizc of thc back yard and thc location of the garage and driveway it does not appear possible to meet the setback requirement with a pool of this size even if it were moved to another part of the backyard. 3. Thc ncighboring house to the south is sct at the rcar of its lot and is approximately l2' away from the pool. The house has one window directly facing the pool. Thero is a chain link fence and some shrubs which partially screen the pool along the property line between the neighboring house and the pool. 4. The plight of thc applicant is not due to circumstances unique to his property. The lot is a typical 40' wide lot with a garage at the back. 5. The pool was installed without the required City permit. If the applicant had applied for the permit, he would have been told that the pool did not meet setback requircments. The representative from United Merchandising told staff that he took over the project whcn another employee of Unitcd Merchandising quit and that a permit was not pulled for th� pool because of a mix up. He said that whcn he iastalled it he assumed that a .permit had been issued. 6. The hardship is self-creatcd. The applicant attempted to pnt in a pool that is too big for the property and did not chcck with thc City about sctbacks. 7. The proposed variance does not meet the intent of the Zoning Code to provide a reasonable distance between swimming pools and neighboring property and will unreasonably diminish the value of the neighboring house. The problem of the reduced setback is made worse by the fact that the pool is next to thc neighboring house. . 8. The variance, if granted, would not permit any use that is not permitted in the zoning district where the property is located. 9. Tha request for variance is not based primarily on a desire to increase the value or income potential of the property. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeals that the request for a variance to waive the provisions of Section 62.114.1 to allow a 4' setback be denied on property located at 1637 Fernwood Street and legally described as Lot 11, Block 2, Chelsea Heights; in accordance with the application for variance and the site plan on file with the Saint Paul Planning Division. (continued) ' • . — -- ' - ------ ?�' � • . � � � : - • '1 �D BY. Zimniewicz 1NDED BY: Maddox tN rAVOR: s AGAINST: o MAILED: June 29, 1988 � TIME LIMIT: No order of the Board oi Zoain� Appeals permittin� the erection or � ilteration of a build[ng or off-street parking facility ahall be valid for a period longer than one year, unless a buildin� permit for such erection or alteration is obtained within such period and such erection or slterstfon is proceedln� pursuant to the terms of such permit. The Board of Zonia� Appeals or the City Councll may �rsnt an extension not to exceed one year. In granttng such extension, the Board of Zontng Appeals may declde to hold a public hearing. �lPPEA,�: Decisions of the Boird of Zonin� Appeals are ilnal subject to appeal to the Clty Council within 15 days by anyone affected by the decision. CER1'IFICATION: I, the underslgned Secretary to the Board o! Zonin� Appeals for the Cfty of Ssint Paul, Minuesota, do hereby certify that I have . . compared the foreEoiaQ copy with the original record ln my office; aad find the same to be � true an� corr�ct co�►y of s�id c+rlginal aad of the whole thereof, as based on spproved minutes of the Saint Paul Board of Zoning Appeats meeting held on June 28, 1988 and on record in the Saint Paul Plannin� Division Office, 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota. SAINT PAUL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS � � ��' � � �. •-��'1� �-"">"'i-"`� �' �'�----------- Secretary to the Board l �� . � -�- ST. PAUL CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE � Z O N I N G RECEIVED AUG 011988 C1TY CLERK To: Representatives of Planning District 1 FIL E N 0. SBD284 Property owners wi thi n 350' . PAGE PURPOSE To review a final plat which creates 11 new single family residential lots. Zoning: R-1 (single family) LOCATION West side of Battle Creek Road at vacated Florence Street. PETITIONER BATTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION, LTD. H E A R I N 6 Thursday, August 11 , i9as 9:00 A.M. � Cit Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall - Court House Q U E S T 10 N S Zoning 298-4154 (Donna Datsko) Contact the Zoning Sectinn of the Planning and Economic Development Department, Room 1101, City Hall Annex, 25 W. 4th Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Notice sent 7/29/88