The URL can be used to link to this page

88-433 WHITE - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANCE GITY OF AINT PAITL Council �� i� CANARV - DEPARTMENT � BLUE - MAVOR File NO. o il Resolution I� Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date EREAS, The Saint Paul Police Department has pplied for two grants from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, State and Local sistance for Narcotics Control Program to purchase crime lab equipment and enhanced reotics surveillance equipment to improve identification, apprehension and prosecution o drug offenders, and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Public S ety grant would cover $125,394 of costs for the project and require a City match of $ 1,798 for a total project amount of $167,192, and WHEREAS, Costs to the City of Saint Paul woul be $41,798, $16 500 of which is budgeted in 1988 in cap ital outlay for Narcotics/Speci 1 Investigations�Fund #436) and $17,350 of whic� is in 1988 capital outlay for Crime Lab ratory(Fund �001) , leaving an unbudgeted matching cost of $7,948, and - - - WHEREAS� The Mayor, pursuant to Section 10.07 1 of the City Charter, does certify that there are available for app�opriation revenues in e cess of those estimated in the 1988 budget, and WHEREAS, The Mayo� recom�ends the following c anges to the 1988 budget: Current Amended ___Budget____ ___Changes Budget FINANCING PLAN ---- ------------- 436 3pecial Projects-Police 7299 Transfer From General Fund 0 7,948 7,948 (04U00 Administrative Units-Police) 3100 Federal Direct Grant, State Admin 0 125,394 125,394 AI1 Other Financing 1,296,801 U 1,296,801 ------------- -------------- ..------------ 1,296,801 133,342 1,430,143 SPENDING PLAN .. _ 436 Special Projects-Police 3�+127 Narcotics Control Grant Surveiil nce 34127-0848 Other..Speeial -Equipment 0 81,292 81,292 34128 Narcotics Control Grant Crime La 34128-0847 Laboratory Equipment 0 52,050 52,050 Al1 Other Spending 1,296,801 0 1,296,801 -- -------- - ----- -------- ------------- 1,296,801 133,342 1,430,143 _ _ NET CHANGE + 133,342 RSSOLVED, That the City Council approves thes changes to the 1988 budget. Approval Recommended - - -t= ----- COUNCIL MEMBERS g g�� Department Yeas Nays Dimond �ng [n Favor Po ice epartmen Goswitz Rettman S Scheibel � Against Y Sonnen �Ison Adopted by Council: Date MAR 2 9 1988 Form App ve b Ci y A rney Certified Passed y il Secret BY � �r��. By, s A►pproved b � vor: Da '� � i �''.� : Approv y Mayor for S s n t '�Eouncil � ; • By t \ --- Pt�StiSHED :.: ._ ��: (�"��3 3 FIRE/POLICE FISC L AFFAIRS iNTER OFFICE GO UNICATIONS WILLIAM H.CARROLL. JR. DEP RTMENTAL ACCOVNTANT RECEIYE[� 3RD FlR 100 E 10TH ST. FE B 1 L 1988 SAINT PAUL, MIN SOTA 55101 292-35 � BU'DGE�' Oft�ICE TO: GREG B�EES FROM: WILLIAM CARR4LL � DATE: 02/11/88 SUBJEGT: STATE �RANT MATCHINC3 F NDS - NARCOTICS CONTROL GREG, THE ATTACHED PACKAGE R �ATES TO A STATE ADMINZSTERED FEDERAL GRANT CAILED THE NARCOTIGS CONTRO PR�JGRAM. THE GRANT IS IN TWO PARTS, THE FIRST ONE IS ACTIVITY �34127 N RCOTICS CONTROL - SURVEI��ANCE. IT WOULD PROVIDE A SURVEILLANCE VAAI� MOTION TRAGKING SYSTEM, MOBILE CAR PHONES, COMPUTER TERMINAL MODEM, PROGRAMMABLE RADIOS, ANO VARIOUS 4PERATING GOSTS. THE STATE GRANT WOULD BE 573,344.00 PLU^-� CITY MATCH 4F 524,448.40 EQUALS A TOTAL PROG AM GOST OF 597,792.00 THE SECOND PROC3RAM IS ACTIVI Y �k34 4 28 IVARCOTICS CONTROL - CRIME LAB. THIS PROGRAM WOV�D PURCHASE AN M.S.CHEM STATION, GAS CHROMATOGRAPH AIVD INTEGRATOR, ME LER ANALYTIGAL BALANCE AND A PORTABLE LASER PRINT FINDER. THE STATE GRA T WOULD BE 852,050.00 PLUS A CITY MATCH OF S 17,350.00 FOR A TOTAL C IME LAB COST 4F �69,400.00. - THE TOTAL CITY CdNTRIBUTION OVID BE S41 ,799.00. WE ASK THAT YOU FUND THIS ONE TIME CITY MATCH IN 01-09064-0537. WE HAVE PREPARED ID 8622, WHICH WE WOULD LIKE YOV TO PPROVE, MOVING THE FUNDS TO THESE NEW ACTIVITIES. IF �dU NAVE ANY QUESTIONS PL ASE FEEL FREE TO GALL ME AT 292-3541 OR I.UGI MITCHELL AT 292-3584. GG� 34127 ADMIN 34128 ADMIN GORRESPONOENCE FILE IUCI MITCHELI � a a� � � °i c ¢ � U y o C •� � � � � 6 � � � d LL � `� a � a . � c 1 � � � � I o c� .N � o � � �' •y '� a� G� •� o > > �. ,� c a � ° a � s� •� o a� � � � U .� O �—I w O t11 d0 3 •,-I cU UI U S.a Q i-� � •rl tA N •ri td J..� U U � 1� U S-� N C N N U q •rl � .0 � L� G. U N 4-a 'C f-i O N V] � �—I W N U 'U Ul r-1 O p1 > I 0 N Q O N @ W U f� O 1� p �O V O � � •rl O c0 • 3-i M � � .:� iJ 1.1 L.i N 4-I �7 y f�+ U cd � U ' v U] co cn a. u C >, � cU .n 3-� � U G1 � E • N .x cd 'b N .^J U) �d o0 9 U •rl W � Q C N Q q c0 G > t0 , '� O N •rl O p cd N 7J � •ri •rl J..1 U � al � rl U cd Gl dG N fd R1 •rl (0 T7 U C 'C Q N 00 �.-� N 1� 3-� • 3 C. •rl •r-I � S.i •rl � U � O t/� O fp c0 JJ > Q � U � C O U Q .--1 G ,C G O � U� N N U N O �—i O C � 3-� v •� a� a v s� •� m •� a� �n a " c.> > •� s� a.� � a� � � •� oa . o > o ocu oro os� o Q E ,� .� � a� oa cn a ,E-� J � o I� aa ' o 0 0 0 0 0 °' o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1� O � 2 O O N �t w N ifl ��—�`� N � �I � O �f1 M N � � M '� .`""�.� = � � ' �„� � � � � � � � E a � 1 1 I I I I I I a Z � W � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � U �� ° � • M � '� � O O O O O O O Q y 0 0 � 0 � � � W N O O O N �T n N tr1 o � � � � � V.` � t!'1 M c�l .-i �--� M .r � � _ � � •rl i,+ > y..� _ . 1J � •� . . � . � R1 'S7 � � OG F+ U f..� E '� � � G1 � +� u a� x � v� m E v a u C� °' C GY. o J� s-� •rl u) > W .[ v � 6 'C � � > �a a .x � m o H o U C � U G1 tC s-r o � cd ' •-+ a u s� m a o s� a� . tC � C N U V E-� L+ •rl �i e0 E � � U p rl c0 N �+ 9, � 1.l N �-1 - U � � U u1 ��I OOOOOO O a' 'r'� .� +� C •rI 'C O O O O O O O V) � O c0 I N N � � pI� � ONO u1 \ . 9 Gl l.� •r� 3-� 00 41 w •• (A i.� 'b i� C l� lA O .-i M u1 M M U "J' •i-1 O •rl � •rl OC �7 u'1 � � c/> > P, E U La W _ O ..,r. ~ U N N p� �--� 00 � C�t 00 �--i N �f1 G� �' f� a yv N tt1 t!1 u'1 �1' u'1 cV�t u'1 � u'1 �1 � n1 � O � 00 00 00 a0 . 00 00 00 00 0� � QO � z V O O O O O O O O O O O O _ __ _ ._..._.,_ r _ _ _.�-- _.____... • � C � _ C E � < � o < � _. � � � � � Q� Q LL �� ¢ 1 � � a '• —� i a � � u �, ,� �o .�,� o� � � w C C\J O � . � � t, 4 G� ..�.� � N t � d ��Q � p '-' W OJ '"' �� 5. ,L r� _.. Q '►' t •.+ 4- o, - �6 1�- N .�.+ Q �1 .,:� � � a� ,�, � pr 0� �: � -- �+ t � U N � C � 3 '�+ d � •� . . Ul 3 > O N ''' Ri 4- N � +� C � ,.� a'' �'' L'1 U! .'+ ..+ ' � f: UI +> ++ O. V � � � 4 � 4- � C � � U! Q S. 4- •UI �� N UI O ,_ �I .,., y,, r1 ,,.� � U U y� N f- 4- Ki 4- +� �O L W dl 01 , ' � �- � � �I � = . � � .-i � U � "� i n � Ql 01 01 N � � � '� U U N N • ++ � � �7 � �~ :. �6 O! G •.a �'�'' 3 -�' 17 Ul � ,..� i, .,a �' � rG i � > •.� p ti u ,� � i i X r�G � ;o U N . Q �C 8 �l U v t� i� v y .� � 0� U � � � '''i U� N •.�- •.� W L UI 4- -•�i Ti N � 3 S lf� rl .1J QI L •..i •.+ .y k, i. 01 UI y •.� 4 N L � S= QUi � � Ql � QI � � �- � u � �c � o, v- .� N �� .� v u tm..� � k. � � mu j ° � � � �� m ,� •� a� u � ;_ u� .., � -� % � �I.L �.9 \ .7 O Z _ � ;'� y 1 5 . 0 � �D I �J � � • ' ~ I h7 �� Q ` I � a E y �' �, �• r g � r� \ �s� so ��; Q Z M W 1— �I �� ., g; � � � � S' !4 1 5 � � p _ 6 �� r y N� .� � � 4� y � � � I f•) Q � I r� � I � . Ch � u� N v E � � v ,�; u � V G E = � . p "�` 9C i] � � � �. 91� � '~ � � � � (1! 4+ _ O O �- - � � � � ' � :a. = J �I ^� � ~ y L � •� � 8 Q � � M L.!6 . .� � O. .,.� y� N � � ' ` '-e G S' � � C� � � N a�O �OC�ON O C ,� � � a � � � x � �, � J W c•1 c+�1 _ � •. � ,�j� M Ie7 -�l '�'' V � � m c� �T u1 U'f J 6 6 ao a0 a0 �I K O O O .:.. ,..: _ ... . . r1� �.r 11e�;..,ti . .. �� .:: � ��+ �� ,,. . . . . : __ _ �� .,��.. g�i.. y ,,� �(l/ �L»T. �' �: ..; � � , . � �.��.-'pNA�A, CHISAGO, DAKOTA, RAMSEY, WASHINGTON COUNTI ` ES, AND 3T. PAUL P.D. -'� EAST METRO COORDINA ED NARCOTICS TASK FORCE Chis Anoka W hingto� R�m y� � PROBLE STATEMBNT Oakota � The area covered by th counties of Anoka, Chisago, Dakota, Ramsey, and Washington is �2, 42 square miles. They cover the north, south, and east metropolitan areas as well as the City of St. Paul . As of 1986 , the total populat�i n of these counties is 1 ,083,246 . This is over 25. 7X of the total population of the State of Minnesota. " Currently, there are 27 arcotics officers working in the above - area. Each agency has the follo ing amount of officers: — - - - - � ANOKA 5 nvestigators including 1_Sugervisor. � CHISAGO 3 Investigators and 1 Supervisor which � .,... ar also assigned other cases in • ad ition to narcotics . - DAKOTA 2 nvestigators and 1 Supervisor. RAMSEY 4 nvestigators and 1 Supervisor. _ WASHINGTON 1 nvestigator and 1 Supervisor. ST. PAUL P.D. 6 nvestigators arid 1 Supervisor. With the limited manpower in so e units there is no possible way these units can keep up with the amount o narcotics dealers in their area. Due to this limited manpower, there are often not enough agents to effectively make a buy. or execute a search warra t or arrest. There is also no consistent ay to exchange information on a timel3- basis between agencies. Agents fr m one county may be working nights and , not available to return calls to . nother agency regarding a suspect they are investigating. This has cre ted investigative problems and s.lowed, curtailed, or otherwise severely ham ered investigations. ^.�� :� `_ ,. . . .. . . .... ...... ... .... . ..��_ ��3:._ � � .:,t�; . �,� �- r= . . Page 2 ' _ PROJBC B%PBCTATIONS - w 1 . Create an EAST METRO COOR INATED NARCOTICS TASK FORCE comprised of the aforesaid agencies. A. All narcotics officers and supervisors in these jurisdictions will be members of - t e TASK FORCE and will be deputized in all counties. B. Since a centralized o fice would not be effective due to the large geographical are involved, all narcotics officers would � remain in their local offices and investigate local cases, = primarily street level d alers . ,. _. _. - � � C. When additional manpow r is needed, any agent can contact other; agencies and draw as man additional officers as needed. �. D. The officer conducting the investieation of the case is the - officer in charg'� of that case. His/her agency is responsible for all property, narco ics , and monies seized. That agency will _ retain all items, inc uding monies , unless prior agreement had - been made or a Federal orfeiture action is taken, at which point - _ all agencies involved would submit for a percentage of the � seizures. . 2 . Create a TAS�i FORCE narcotics radio frequenc3-. This could be done at a minimum cost using existing rad o equipment with all agencies programming the same frequency into their espective radios. This channel would not be scrambled or on a repeate . This would allow all agents to have efficient radio communications . , - � � , ,::. .., ...,_.. .... , . ..... . .... _ _._ ___ _ _ . ....... ...... __ . .., . ... . ... . .... . :�� . , � :. . :_ �,�-�-�,3.3 - .�r :�' �_� . .. Page 3 ; Project Sxpectations - continued� Currently on any operation i volving more than one agency� there is no one radio frequency that can ' be used, as each agency has different channels . Also, no one agency h s enough extra radios to .supply assisting agencies . The difficulty is gre t due to problems in relaying information over two different channels a d the risk for officer injury is also increased. 3 . Create a Narcotics Informa ion Computer System (NICS ) . This system would consist of a computer erminal at each member office capable of entering and retrieving inform tion from a common data base relating to narcotics violators. u - A. Each member will inst 11 the necessary equipment to be able to - enter and retrieve infor ation. � t " � t B. The narcotics data ba e will be housed at Washingto.n County a$� part of the County's Law Enforcement Information System. i C. NICS will be a -secur system with only member narcotics agents having access capabiliti s . D. Members will have 24 ho r access capabilities to NICS. This will _ allow investigators ccessibility to all known narcotics _ _ violators in the task fo ce area without the normal delay. E. Reduce or eliminate d plication of reports . Each agent will enter information into the computer system which will serve as the reporting tool for lo al agency and the task force. s : � . �� _ � , � /�� - . (. • , Page 4 PROJB T MBTHODOLOGY w Creating a decentralized n rcotics task force can be implemented efficiently with a minimum of cost. Because there are currently a relatively small number of off'cers assigned to narcoti.cs investigation, the departments cannot afford to deplete their staff (even by one officer) .by placing him/her on a traditio al task force. If the agencies did place an officer in a traditional ta 1; force environment � the task force would . be a small ineffective unit. kith the decentralized tas force, there will be a minimum amount of t�me and mone�- needed to implem nt the task force. there will be no need - to rent space, furniture, tel phones , :file cabinets , etc. , as would be needed by a traditional task force. Also, with the decentralized task� ; force concept, no additional m npower would be needed for supervision a� each unit super�•isor would be a le to supervise his/her unit and yet ha��e .1 some co�trol of the task for e as he/she c:ill be a member of the Task Force Eoard. • � k'ith the EAST METRO COORD NATED NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, all officers .� will be able to enter and r trieve information on known narcotics violators . With each member na cotics unit ha�ing access to NICS through their oc:n computer terminal , gents will be able to access the computer � with their individual password and have accessibilit3� to enter and retrieve data 24 ho�ars a day This will allow for a more efficient ekchange of information and t e elimination of redundant eff'orts b�- several agencies regarding the s me violator. Officers will also have the availability to utilize up to 15 to 20 additional trained narcotics officers to assist in all are s of narcotic �iolations when needed. At other times , all narcotics investigators can continue narcotics investigation in their respect ve areas. This concept maintains the � maximum utilization of man hour as individual offi�ers are more familiar with their respective areas and v olators within that area. : _ . , . . ��_�3,3 . .k�';i�'" . Page 5 Project Methodology - continued This concept will also make available the regular planning of "sweeps" of street dealers in various a eas. At present�. this is not possi6le due to case load and available r sources within each agency. With the EAST METRO COORDINATED NARCOTICS T g FORC13, these types of operations can be planned and executed far more quickly and efficiently because of the capability to produce addition 1 manpower for these operations. Local officers will possess the inf rmation on the areas where these tspes of operations will be the most effec ive. Each agency will request fr m the grant committee equipment they feel is necessary to bring their espective narcotics units up to standards th�t will make them effective, co sistent with the Task Force concept. � a The Task Force will operat with a Board consisting of the narcoticsf unit supervisor (or their des gnated representative) from each agency.� That representative must be a na cotics officer working in the Task Force � .� and have the authority from his her department to make decisions and vote on Task Force issues . Thig will insure equal input from all members and a coordinated effort to arrest stre t dealers in the east metropolitan area. PRO ECT SUMMARy � Utilization of the EAST ETRO COORDINATED NARCOTICS TASK FORCE through this grant will allow the member agencies to retain their respective narcotics units . It ill also allow for an information system to which all narcotics officers w uld have access to inquiry and reporting capabilities thus reducing paper ork. The end result will be an increase in the number of narcotics violato s apprehended. . ��j';�:4 ! ' V�- (/I I � -*.�;�t:. .. EAST METRO OORDINATED NARCOTICS 'TASK FORCE J INT POWERS AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into between the Counties of Anoka, Chisago, Dakota, Ramsey and Washington, by a d through their Sheriff's Offices and the City of St. Paul, by and through th St. Paul Police Department (herein collec- tively referred to as "the parties" . WHEREAS, the parties are each espectively charged with the .enforcement of the laws of the State of Minnesota n their respective 3urisdictions; and . WHEREAS, the parties desire to promote the effective enforcement of such laws, particularly as they relate t laws concerning controlled substances; and WHEREAS, the nature of control ed substance violations is such that coor- dinated, multi-jurisdictional effor s are needed for effective enforcement; :� _ NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Mi nesota Statute §471.59, the Joint Powers -- -- _ � - Act, the parties agree as�follows: '- _ 1. Each party will assign suc licensed peace officers and unlicensed � personnel as that party deems appro riate to assist and participate in the East .t; .� Metro Coordinated Narcotics Task Fo ce (hereinafter "Task Force"). 2. Each party shall d"esignate and advise all other parties of the name or names of such person or persons who shall have authority to assign personnel to operate under the provisions of thi agreement. 3. Whenever in the opinion of the officer of a party assistance is needed _ from one or more of the other party or parties in the enforcement df controlled ' substances laws, the party desiring assistance shall make an oral or written request for assistance from the res onding party or parties. 4. Upon receipt of a request or assistance, the responding party may assign and direct such personnel as that party deems fit to provide assistance - 1 - . f . .ti�.ti:�i� ., � > - . ��'�� •�i•7:•�.. . ' + . . in the nature and to the extent it deems fit. S. A party which is requeste to provide assistance shall make a good faith effort to provide the assist nce requested, but no guarantee is made that the requested assistance will be p ovided and each party expressly agrees that r failure to provide requested assis ance will not result in any liabilitp claim by the requesting .party -against th other party. 6. Whenever a party provides ersonnel for assistance to another par�y under this agreement that personnel shall at all times remain an employee and agent of the agency providing assis ance. Said employee shall remain under the ultimate direction and control of t e agency providing assistance, shall be compensated by that party, includin worker's compensation, shall be indemnified t: and defended by that party and shal be deemed to be acting in the course and - scope of employment ef that party. - : 7. Each party shall be respon ible and liable for its own personnel, � * - equipment and supplies and shall ha e sole title and interest in any equipment . ' � and supplies it utilizes as part of this agreement unless some alternative arrangement is provided for in writ ng. 8. Licensed peace officers an licensed part-time peace officers vho act under the terms of this agreement s all be granted peace officer authority to the full extent authorized by Minne ota Statutes, including, but not limited to Minn. Stat. § 629.34 and § 629.40. To the extent necessary, the parties agree -that each may grant peace officer a thority to licensed peace officers and licensed part-time peace officers a ready employed in that capacity by another party. In such cases, the officer o appointed shall for all purposes other than peace officer authority, remai an employee of the initial appointing party - 2 - • � �: . ; - - �-�-�.�.� . � . :�.:�� - for purposes of paragraph 6 herein. 9. This agreement shall conti ue into effect so long as all parties desire to continue to participate in the agreement. Any party may withdraw from the agreement upon thirty (30) days wri ten notice to all other parties. If any � party so withdraws from this agree nt, the other parties may continue this agreement under. the terms set forth herein or under such other terms as all parties agree upon. 10. Any assets or property'sub'ect to legal forfeiture as a result of enforcement actions under this agre ment shall be distributed to the parties as follows: � A. The law enforcement agency which commenced the particular =z investigation will be consider d the "appropriate agency," as - defined by Minn. Stat. � 152.1 and asset�•and proceeds distribution between law enforcement, prose ution agencies and state authorities - will be pursuant to Minn. Stat § 152.19. �� - :� ., B. In cases subject to federa forfeiture proceedings, distribution • of assets or proceeds shall be governed by applicable federal statutes, regulations and procedures. IN WITNESS WHEREOF: For: Anoka County Sheriff �.Zy �Lt ,� L,�C,c22/�f�_ - - �. p�u� Approved as t Form: sistant Cou ty Attorney For: Chisago County Sheriff � .� �. . App ved a rm: County Attorney - 3 - - . ::v, , . �--`-�-�3.3 For: Dakota County Sheriff Approved as to Form: � Assistant County Attorney � a� K For: Ramsey County Sheriff Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney �— For: Washington County Sheriff �.y,�,z.z. ' ��,titi� Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney kc For: St. Paul Police Department — : - - - - - Approved as to Form: " City Attorney ;; 4 — • � . _ � ��--��3 z,z6,$8 1 2 iz6 i8s RECEIVED Police Narcotics/Crime Lab t�rants �,a� � �988 C3reg, BUDGET OFFICE 1 . Narcotics grant: Activity 34120 Narcotics/Special Investigati ns includes 853,800 for cap i ta 1 out I ay � equ i p to be f i nancect by d ug money tnat i a se i zed. DicK Duganc292-3755) aays tney�ve seized S 0,000 to cJate, so not quite 8nough to buy ali the stuff they pia ned. S40,000 of the �SS,500 is buctqetecJ for a survei I lance van wnich thi� grant wi I I COVer 75% Of. NOP1P Of th� OthCl' C�pitdt O t18�y itCil'1� overiap WhB�t is reque�ted in thi� grant for 1987 or 198 . Even with th� increasetl cost of tne vant�4 ,40o Co 545,000> ancl the less than expectecJ col lection of drug mone seiz�cicbut its only Feb.) Act+vity 34120 coulct match 816,500 of the 524,448 requestec! with its own unspent budgeted van mon�y. Drug moneytest 2/22/88) �34,000 cap outlay excl van 13,so0 Ava i 1 for match 16,540 Pol ice wou Icl st i I 1 need f7,948 to meet their match requ iremenLS for tne grant. Dugan aicln�t seem to nav� othe cleaigns an the money, just wanted to maFCe sure ne couicJ buy othe items. 2. Crime Lab grant: Activity 34055 Crime L�boratory adopted 198 auaget inclucles $20,OOa ana 04306 adopteC 1988 buclqet incluQes 833,210 for capitai outiay S equip. Two pieces of equip in the C3eneral Fund, an an lytical balance at f1,800 and a portable laser latent print enhancer t 530,000 are items thi� grant will pay 757L of. None of the otner ca ital outlay item� overlap wnat is requested in tnis grant for 198? ar 1988. cap outiay for balancer & la�er print 531 ,800 qrant match needed s17,350 surplus cap outlay � equip budget 14,450 Jonn McCabec292-3606) verified that these g ant items were one �nc! the �ame with the budget ancf offered buctg� ec! * a5 match right away. I cliscusseci using already bucf9eted capital utiay funds as match witn Lucy M i tcl'ie 1. SI'1e i nC!i cateC! tt'1at they hadn' c�'1ecI�CeCI 1988 butlqets for grant items. �� k �� ,, � � t� � ;� ��ft; ,.. �,��,� � � �. - �� . . �' '�� . .