88-254 WHITE - CITV CLER
PINK - FINANC-E G I TY OF SA I NT PA U L Council �j�'7/
E•ANARV� DEPARTME r File NO. � � v '
BLUE -MAYOR
�
Council �Zesolution �g
Presented By �
Referred o - Committee: Date
Out of C mmittee By Date
WHEREAS, he Saint Paul City Council supports the protection and preservation
of buildi gs and areas having special architectural , historical , and comnunity
interest r value; and
WHEREAS, he Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission has been created to
research nd recommend to the City Council buildings and areas to be
designate as heritage preservation sites or districts, and has empowered the
Heritage reservation Commission to protect the architectural character of
designate sites and districts; and
WHEREAS, he 1983 Historic Sites Survey of Saint Paul and Ramsey County states
that the rea of Dayton's Bluff west of Mendota Street "contains one of the
area's gr atest concentrations of nineteenth century buildings, including good
examples f the Italianate, East Lake, and Queen Anne styles"; and
WHEREAS, he area of Dayton's Bluff west of Mendota Street also contains an
important collection of Victorian commercial buildings and nineteenth century
vernacula Victorian workers houses; and
WHEREAS, the 1986 District 4 Plan Update states that it is the neighborhood's
goal "to increase the preservation of historically significant structures and
heighten areness of the area's interesting history," and that the Dayton's
Bluff/District 4 Community Council "will support all efforts to save historic
homes in t e neighborhood;
NOW, THERE ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council requests Heritage
Preservati n Commission research of the area of Dayton's Bluff bounded by the
Burlington Northern railroad tracks and Mounds. Boulevard on the west, Hudson
Road on th south, Maple, Arcade and Hope �treets on the east, and Minnehaha
Avenue on he north to determine eligibility for possible heritage
preservati n district designation; and
COUNCILM lV Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
[n Favor
Against BY
Adopted by Council Date Form Approved by City Attorney
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
By
A►pproved by Mavor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
BY BY
WH17E - CITV CLERK COI1RC11
PINK -.FINANCE G I TY O F SA I NT PA LT L �o�S
GANARV� DEPARTME T
BLUE - MA1'OR File NO.
�
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referre o .�ommittee: Date
Out of C mmittee By Date
BE IT FUR HER RESOLVED, that National Register and local district nomination
forms be repared for any area determined to be eligible for heritage
preservat on district designations; and
ALSO, BE T RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Commission provide the
City Coun il with the results of the research and its recommendation on
possible eritage preservation district designation in the Dayton's Bluff
area,
BE IT FI LY RESOLVED, that the intent of this resolution is for the Heritage
Preserva ion staff to apply for state grant funding for said study. Absent the
the fund' g, the study would go through the normal Heritage Preservation
Commissi application process.
COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of:
Yeas DimOnd Nays �
Goswitz [n Favor
Long
Rettman � Against BY
Scheibel
� FEB 2 � 1988
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Counci : Date
Certified Pa_ d ncil S et BY
By
A►pproved b Mavor e � Z �' � �� ��2 6 {�''Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By � BY
pUBI.ISHED i�'':HR - 5 19a6 �
Zz,t' ;���,*�#?��"���`�it,� ��tv , � � ��j �e � �-'�
' zw � ��/I"�y.�-�
f: �; ' `' ' C uncil Research Center �o�Vp 117 0 0 :
C c i 1 DEPARTMENT FE B 1 �� • ^ �
.� CONTACT PAME
_ r PHONE �
DATE .
SS NG RD (See rever e side.)
_ Departme t Director Mayor (or Assistant)
_ Finance nd Matlagement Services Director �City Clerk ..
_ Budget D ractor • _
_ City At� rney _
0 : _�„_ <Clip 11 locations for signature.)
�
W V C 0 ? (Fu�pose/Rationale)
This resolut on directs' the Heritage Preserva ion Commission to reseazch the area of Dayton's
Bluff bounde by the Burlingt,on Northern RR t acks and Mounds Blvd. on the west, Hudson Road �
on .the south Maple, Arcade and Hope Streets n the east�, and Minnehaha Ave. on the north to
determine el gibility for possible heritage eservation district desi�nation. �
It also requ sts that National Register and 1 cal district nomination_ foxms be prepared for
any area det rmined to be eligible for herit e preservation district designations, and
directs the ommissit�n to provide the City C ncil with results of research along with its. xec-
N BUD Y ND EL IM C D: ommendation,
N/A
N C D BUDG T V UMBE C D:
(Mayor's sig ture not required if under $10, 00.) N/A
Total Amo of Trans�ction: Activity Number:
� Funding So ce: Z, ��1 ��
�o"�,
ATTACHMENTS: (List and number all attachment .� w� a �'"���.
Resolutio (2 pages) � d
"'''�-��� ..
DM S RA IV PR CEDURES
_Yes o Rules, Regulations, Procedu es, or Budget Amendment required?
_Yes o If yes, are they or timetab e attached?
DEPARTMENT R I W CITY ATTORNEY �tEVIL�i
_Yes N Council resolution required? Resolution requiredP �Yes �,Ho
_Yes _N Insurance required? Insurance sufficient? _Yes _No
Yes N Insurance attached? ,
����
��
. s--- � - �e-. - �
. , .
';:;`�` � �q� T0 �tS� THE GREEN SHEET , , ° .� ..•,_
_' � ' .. .V ww'Y , .
� The GREEN SHEET has three PURP4&ES: .
• 1. to assist i.a routing documents aad in securing re4uired aigt�atures;�
2. to brief the revisxers of documents on the impacts of approval;
3. to help ensure that necessary supporting materials are prepared and, if required, "
attached.
Providing complete information under tha listed headings enables revie�rers to make �
decisions on the docuarents and eliminates follow-up contacts that map delay eaecution.
Below is the Rreferred ROUTING for the five most frequent tpves of documenta:
CONTRACTS (asswnes authorized budget exists)
1. Outside Agency 4. Mayor
2. Initiating Department 5. Finance Director
3. City Attorney 6. Finance Accounting
Note: If a CONTRACT amount is less than $10,000, the Mayor's signature is not required,
if the department �director signs. A contracb must alaays be signed by the outside agency
before routing through City offices.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget xevision) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (all others)
.1. Activity Manager 1. Initiating Department
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Departmen�t Director � 3. Mayor/Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Clerk
5. City Clerk
� 6. Chief Accounta�t, Finance and. Management Services
COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Budget Amendment/Grant Acceptance) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others)
1. Department Director 1. Department Director
2. Budget Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. l�iayor/Assistant
4. Mayor/Assistant 4. City Clerk
5. Chair, Finance, Mgmt. . and Pers. Cte. S, City Council
6. City Clerk
7. Citp Council
8. Chisf Accountant. Finance and Management Services
The COST�$ENEFIT. BUDGETARY. ,AND PERSONNEL IMPACTS �heading provides space to explain the
cost/benefit aspects of the decision. Costs and benefits relate both to City budget
A (General Fund and/or Special Funds) and to broader financial impacts (cost to users,
homeoanezs, or other groups affected by the action) . The personnel impact is a description
of Change or shift of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions.
The g�,�NISTRATIVE PROCEDURES section must be completed to indicate whether addit�.onal
administrative procedures, including rules, ragulations, or resource proposals are
necessary for implementa�ion of an ordinance or resolution. If yes, the procedures or a
timetsble for the completion of procedures must be attached.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS. In the ATTACH1dENTS section. identify all attachments. If the Green
Sheet is vrell done, no letter of transmittal need be included (unless signing such a letter
is one of the requested actions) .
ote: If an agreement requires evidence of insurance/co-insurance, a Certificate of
Insurance should be oae of ths attachments at time of routing.
o ec Actions which require City Council resolutions include contractual relationships
�ith other governmental units; collective bargaining contrscts; purchase, sale, or lease of
land; issuance of bonds by City; eminent domain; assumption of liability bq City, or
granting by �City of indemnification; agreements with state or federal government under
which they are providing funding; budget amendments.
�:
' - - __ _ -- - -- /�
tiMtTE — C�TV CLEHK
�tNK — �INANCE COUflCIl f
�nr�qRV — DEPwRTME T G I TY O F ►SA I NT PA U L (�(�'Gl��
9LUE — MAYOR File �O.
�
Council Resolution
Presented By
Referred_ o --Committee: Date
Out of Co mittee By Date
BE IT FUR HER RESOLVED, that National Register and local district nomination
forms be prepared for any area determined to be eligible for heritage
preservati n district designations; and
ALSO, BE I RESOLVED, that the Heritage Preservation Commission provide the
City Counc'1 with the results of the research and its recommendation on
possible h ritage preservation district designation in the Dayton's Bluff
area.
�
� + )��: � ;�r� �%�, i n
� �
— ��,e};,,,�..�( �
i�� i T x� ,
�,� !`/ - - ����� �t���� � � � �- _
' L "� �
<=�.Y�
� �j
�
����c � - ��� �/�C s�
��-��.��- �4
� � ���� �� ��'a� � �,
`� , �.
� c�
�-�- - � `� �-.-----' )
, � �� � y��r� �
C _
- � a
� ��
COUNCILMEN � � �
Yeas ays Requested by Department of: c- �'-�'���'�L
[n Favor - ---- - ----
Against BY
Form Approved by City Attorney
�dopted by Council: Date '
Certified Passed by Co ncil Secretary BY
gy. .
Approved by lilavor: ate Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council
By BY