89-1476 � I 1
City of St.Paul � COUNCIL FILE NO. —
�
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSE�S ENT By � �` f�' �```
.t j _ � �
�. ���' � ..
Filp Nn��1� S1rSB
Votin 2��4
g Assessment No.
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefitts, c st and expenses for
6 & 7 coastractioa of c4acre�e vtrh on Iiianshsha Av�a� bet�a� Strah
Dxive and �vacated Greex��rf r Strset. Thia is a part af the
Azcade/Mi�ehat►a �Lreet Pa a� snd Lighting Proj�sct.
I
�
Preliminary Order '� approved� �'r3�
Final Order approve�
A public hearing having been had upon I the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and hav'ng een considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment b an the same is hereby in all respects ratitied.
RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessme t be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 64.�4 f the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
I
�
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date � �� ��
Yeasj�� Nays
�� Certified se b Council Se etary
�f
���n �In Favor By
8cl�eibel 7
� Against
iiilit►a
AUG � � ��7� Mayor
�� q � 6 1989
City of St.Paul CO[JNCIL FILE N0.��- ,,L�f.I�'
Office of The Director of Finaince
By
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF �►S ESSMENT .>�'°"�° .- :-n�-M� •�
, ,�..,
File No. 1$�S�--H3
h
Votin ��9�
g Assessment No.
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, c st and expenses for
i i� � eonstz�seti�►a ot c�r�t� o� �i�ttha tivf�e 6�tw�n Strob
Bri�e aad �rasat+�d Crse�lri r ��r�et. ?hh�� ia a part a�� �
Arca�l�im�t�siw �s�ist !�e � asul Y.�L3a� �'ro,��mtt.
Preliminary Order � -% approved � f 3`�I
Final Order approve�i
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby reports t� th Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ��105.34
Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 213.16
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
ProcessServing Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �,318.50
ChargeTo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �,318.50
Said Director further reports that he has asse ed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, tawit: the sum
of $ upon each anti ev ey lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel o land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto atta hed, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessment as completed by hi , and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper. �
� Dated
� Director of Finance
r I , _ .
_ , � • • RE 6/28 89 ' C�.�'J—����
,
��"�ro���Nq� 6/2 /s GREEN SHEET No. 3�6�5,�
Finance & Mana ement Services
CONTACT PER80N 3 PFIONE �D�ARTMENT DIRECTOR �CRY COUNqL
Peter White 298-5317
p«„►�„� ���
MUBT BE ON COUNdL AOENDA BY SDA� �BUDOET dRECTOR �FlN.3 MGT.�RVICEB DIR.
Must be in City Clerk's Of f ice no ��Y����� 'LZ] Council Researc
�
TOTAL#►OF SIONATURE PAOE8 (CLIP LL OCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACTION REGUES'TED:
Approve assessment for construction of co crete curb on Minnehaha Avenue between Stroh
Drive and vacated Greenbrier Street. hi will be a supplement to the ARCADE/MINNEHAHA
PAVING AND LIGHTING PROJECT (Finance F le 4�18454-SB)
RE�Dn7ioNS:MP��+W a►Rel� ) COlJ IL M�REPORT OPTIONAL
�W►� PNONE NO.
_PLANNINO COMM18810N _CML 8ERVICE OOMM18810N
dB OOMMITTEE _
`� sT� _ c�M Nrs:
_D�TRICT OOURT _
SUPPORTS WMlqi OOUNdL 08JECTIVE4 1
IN�TIATiNO PR08LEM�IS8UE�OPPOR7UNITY Wh�n�WMro WhYI:
This section of Minne alia venue tsee at ached map) was not scheduled for street improvement
under the original project. This pro ec allows for inclusion of an assessment for the
additional curbed area to the existin p ving and lighting projects.
I
�
ADVANTAOES IF APPFlOVED:
This new curb will improve the appear nc of the street in question.
I
asnov�wr�es��veo:
Construction of this new curb will c ea e an additio.nal assessment for the Stroh Brewery
property. Said easement is payable ve 20 years via property taxes.
asnovurr�ES iF rar�o:
Not to assess would be contrary to r nt policy.
CoGr,c�f Research Center
JUN 2 8 i°89
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s 7 318.5� �T/pEyENUB BUDOETED(CIRCLE ON� YES NO
����� Assessment A��N� CPL-C87-27602-6101-29005
FlNANqAL INFOFUAA710N:(EXPWI�
• , , . _
'� i
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE OREEN SH6ET INSTHUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are preferred routings for the Hve most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized COUNqL RESOLUTION (Amend, Bdgts./
budget exists) Accept.Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Depertment Director
2. Initiating Department 2. Budget Director
3. City Attorney 3. City Attomey
4. Mayor 4. Maycx/Assistant
5. Finance&Mgmt Svcs. Director 5. (�tty Council
6. Finance Axounting 6. Chief AccouMaM, Fn &Mgmt Svcs.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNqL RESOLUTION (all others)
Revision) and ORDINANCE
1. Activity Manager 1. Initiating Dspertment Ditectw
2. Department Axountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. MayodAssistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. (�►ief Accountant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (ell others)
1. Initiating Department
2. City Attorney
3. MayodAssistant
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indfcate the#of pages on which signatures are required and re8
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the project/request aeeks to accompllsh in either chronologi-
cal order or oMer of importence,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write�mplete aentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete N the issue in question has been preseMed before any body,public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by IisUng
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIf�HBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REf�UESTED BY COUNCIL
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or c�nditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by lew/
charter or whether there are spec�ic ways in which the Gty of Saint Paul
and its citlzens will benefit from this project/action.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
apprrnred? Inabiliry to deliver aervice?CoMinued high trafflc, noise,
accldent rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
ARhough you must talbr the information you provide here to the iasue you
are addressing, in generel you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cosYt Who is gofng to pay?
�
�
�
� _ � �
� . , . i l; �i
� i I
� � � ' �
W � � i
I
a , o O I i
o p I I � ; t
.. ry , , ry � I
i
�' a , a I i
N lV I
~ n �i n a I i
Z m m � ' m oo ;
� c� r� I w c�
�
� � ' � ri
� O • • I � •
� � ; � ;
� � ; ; i i , i
I
� F�0- �o ' � ;
M �Q ' . . . . ., .. , .
� � O �' �i � �', . . . . �
�^ I . . . . I , , I
I IV � .� �1 � I . I .
F � �
� � � � . I I I . �, '. . �' �, I '.
d � ! I ! j � i
' ! ' � i �
�
d �� � � � � � �
i
t
iC �W O I i
F a I
w : ; � ;
uEi : s i
i
�n . o ,
a ' � � ' ' '
I i
� � � �� �� � ; � � � � ; �
� rc � ' i i ;
f. � m j ,� ' , �
�
M I
� � .� �
°z ' � �'��� �° .�~o � �. j ; ' I
�
» : � °'Y°� ���,�g °YD� �
I . O � W�aJO�J�fd�l-pN�J�� I
u v a�on�i. os»� n i I
� : o��'w°o..~Yarn�w►-»� o i i
z t�.�� .�z• �. w .i►t '�.
O • �L���!-��O��If~W�.�fi�af0..� � i
� Z ��� .. �"J .� �'����G�� !
� O ��.u�zW�sxn�.r�WOS�JYia , ,
U HO~. 'IOtAO�y�MI-.rNOOWJ��diM'W ,
J �p,� F�F-tJQetP��lY�O Ii2c� Z>��nj '
� ONy� �G1v�j„Z�jl�-ii��UY7Jm���(AF-F�tJAIW i
� dfa �¢�tA�Ca.��JO�fAOJJa��>�#N '
: '' a i i
• � � i � ��1 I i �. � �� �. �� �.
� � � � � � . �. . , ; �
YWW� ' i .e
� i
r
N
� M
� ����i� � „�
FS- �O���3jjj M��, ! ' �o
���' ; �
d
� � N�g�R� , , 4
� � ��8��� ; o
: i �
; � . . ,
_ ^ _ _ • - • - - _ _ - - - i . _ � -. _ ,• _ _ ^
y , . . . � .� . . � �/=��-i�7�
CaNC.R��t'� C.yRPS FoR M� NE�Att A �1�E. I�T S'tRot1'
AR.C.A�E�M INNE+kPt4�}�! �'h IN� �r �II�l+T1 NC� SUP 4LEM�N'T'
— F�H�tycF. ���E � t�454- F, _
�-�: �.a,..�, _ , . _; . ,;r; � �,. - �
; . . _ ...
- :,: ., ; ,. ,
. . ,� ; ..
,.... _:.. . Q�_, �� . . . . . . �
-- .—,P�3�.- -���c ' ae'--uur,_ v�V11p
' I"' a. ".{y', � -------:l.d-�O' -; n •�-- --�7f� - ' '-�- ��=A. ».i . i
r��f((`) hf)J « .y t �. ' i • W , � , � ;
..�iu y �..�� :n �ie/���J e .8 � 5 0" V 1 ; r� � r c i z � +�1 � r: �s �� �� � t : � �..
p.> M� li � �� y- I i
,','�, r.�. O n« i t O� �I e' ��: � I ' �. n��cn'.Ir� � � � �
, � �tu! 0�'fsv�a
I hl 1 ♦i}� ::'_"f.� i� '.' ' ',' "' V �
. �i �i7f� ��'� ,���°2� �.< '- — - - ; y' �„ °,�
+r� .il I I L M1 y � ., `<. ``' e
zr�:r, � �, �ie �9 f[o t, " �: ��„� � �e n n n y� .�i � �e �� �s �� n �e �_ te e I
K- '""'"I."IPylu� � o t� . �� � i ir.��
., _. ... °° _��,,� ,� , _� ;:
. . �-- =---,�-, �- � . - - --
. �,<.,�o �-- ,�.,�o �` REANEY
OnC.'S09M\I�__' \ OOC.�LolN9� _ ,/ �
' -��-iif T" r I .
y+t' } ��. � (~� ���� (^n i �r�.... � T'�� II � . I ,+�e Q +n
-N- 12' 1� lo ! 8 7� � .>ls.s�.� 1 n Pf i� i��t S i���s I I 1 �l f � f I i :5 i 1 �! i L 1 � !
' � I)i � � .-l�.��.� •; I � .
.• r 1 I ' O �,I b') I
.� `�" '��, '�-�----�- a�-,M.. - u., n:, ��'», <.•�.,; �
Z 3 ;� : ti..�e -� �- - - -� OC
��- r.� "� �, ��.� �„ r�, �., �., ,.�,
i'` �
t5 : Q ,u �s u n u 19, _1.`�O• � y��:�• n/� e �� �� is n n � o� -+n r.I it ra q n �l I er n
(•) �. �.s /� � a* . ` I �s
�� �. �� ' /� . � I..
�� MINNEl�#P►HA AVE.
�'66,;� 3 >�� .�.. _:,...,_,';:..,. :;:.��;:�::r+::�� �:`:�'�::•:•r:: . >.�.,..+',.j.,y an . �.. ,� ' 3. I �
{��,,•�' •� y �. 1 i ^s a� <��Gr
- 2� + �{ •• � � Q ryn�i0 9 �:8 � 7 i 6�S I a�3� Z-�i- y F 3' '2�� i .25 2a.
�F" s _1� J 1• ` � . 'af 'n''���t.i� � .L. '
W r .3�.1---=--'�.1:.»�=� 'bl�
8 7 •/-� �Y" ; ��6 2"�=--`= — -- _ .
� r iw � l � • •�
;�, . W.;�,,,9-"�,.-_ P �R - Q�,.,.•�1 ;�. ? � ° � .
� � A o ,� :1.�. �� . � ��-
pq Q� I � % � �(^�`'� ow° ` : @I17jtalYS�16(q �9 19 , 21�w� � 5 I , t 11._:
.0 J�: ���0 . //��4 � � J" x u � V' '� I I�o��� �.ii el.f 22� , „ .. n6,ea �r�. . I� ..
6 ,' �A ` ' - .�-�= :� �'L� - i
..� Q �^ ,. ,z F� GO' �w4• o y BEECH =r�... • � �� �.
..' W � � 13 i / /�E � .. .. . � .. ' sa ' 1 � -��r.}
�. p ,,( s :; � „�� ��;� ^��_ _ s ,-� I ;
7�w � � �I ./ Z . esi ., y ..fSc �a �}�j2�G'��I����9.iA 7'S �S , s� 2 6 _� -�, Z �
L °. � �
3T.:�%'�, ' �/; .%�..:..�.��':a�u � _ I ���� .�� ���,�i i i 3' .� . .. ,.... .� , � i J
. �`q'��,.f � * . 'a ' ,n ..r .�lisi r�c� ��,.i ii � �_2A_''W�.�IT ,��w��
',µ I — j
8' .� � Za_P `�'��• � �°'�Z " ��skT �B �920 21I22 2i2�a�23+26 : � 29 �:�•-9 9 ,01�� �2 13F�a�
'Cq�/l'I � � �6 ,3 .'. 1¢1 � ' � . r �i � SO -i' - ..I sc�-.�
��� 't . . M - - . . . b '.:al�.y� _
✓a! R �S../` W �s � I �- b -MAtiOAREF�------.. _. . _ -- ------ - ' -- ,
/ Q is . S �'!':—''�G� /, .' �-�. . _., � ��`1'i � .e
........... Loc.RT►oN oF �R I iy� I NS�t"a�..��A-n ON
Saint P� 1 Cit Council ��-/�7�
.�t== �• y
.
;` '; Public ' earing Notice
= �'�� ' Ratificati'o of Assessment
r w0
•
I/{•
. ...............................
OWNER OR TAXPAYER CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT # 6j.�' «<
DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCIL A '<O�t:
_...
THE STROH BREWERY COMPANY C/O JO N FILE � 1�3�tfi�»SB `
DINSMORE ASSESSMENT # �684
�oo RIVER P�ACE �' PROPERTY ADDRESS
DETROIT MICHIGAN 48207-4224 ! 7�`p��NE {t�E>
PARCEL ID �tCEIVED
__ .... . ._.__..... __ __
.. .. .. .................. _.....
__�y._... �.} .�y..�.y. ....._.. __
�37��ayCL�����-Qt371 -:�:�
' JUL 2'� 1989
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION � CITY CLERK
THEO. HAMM BREWING CO ADDITION, ST. P�AU VAC STS 8� ALLEYS ACCRUING & SUBJ TO THE
10 BLKN 52 L�OTS 9NT�RUS16 BLKE55TLOTS !9T RU�15�BLK 58�&RALLDOF BLKS&423�51�5� & &
57, & ALL OF BLK 44 OF STINSONS SUBD LO 16 OF WARRENS GARDEN LOTS, EX E 9.14 FT
LOT 3 & ALL OF LOTS 4 THRU 19 BLK 1 OF CHURMEIER & EVANS ADD, PART OF WATER POWER
RESER- VATION & LOTS 1 & 2 BLK 8 OF IFiV ES 2ND ADD, PART OF BLK 1 & 4 IN BORUP & PAYNES
ADD, A 15.5 FT MOL PART OF THE 100 FEE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND IN THE THEO HAMM
BREWING C0. ADD. ALL OF BLK 1, 2, 3, & B K 4 , _
PURPOSE To conside� approva of the assessment for:
CONSTRUCTION OF CO CRETE CURB AND GUTTER AS PART OF THE
ARCADE/MINNEHAHA P VING AND LIGHTING PROJECT
PUBLIC TIME: WEDNESDAY, UGUST 2, 1989 AT 9:00 A.M.
WORKS pLACE: ROOM 707 CI Y HALL/COURT HOUSE
COMMITTEE This is where proble s should be discussed so they can be
MEETING resolved before the ublic hearing.
THE TIME: THURSDAY, AU UST 17, 1989 AT 9:40 A.M.
PUBLIC pLACE: City Councii Chambers, 3rd Floo� City Hall-Court House
HEARING Written or oral state ents by any owner will be considered by
the Council at this h aring.
ASSESSMENT The proposed asses ment for the above property is $ r,318.50
INFORMATION Your final assessme t will be the amount approved by the City
Council at the public hearing. The amount specified on this
notice is the amount that is being recommended to the City
Council for approval. The proposed assessment roll for this
pro ject is available r review in the Finance Dept. Room 218�
City Hall.
NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YOU ILL RECEIVE AN INVOICE AFTER THE HEARING
SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT APPR VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH INSTRUCTIONS
ON HOW TO PAY THIS ASSESS ENT.
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE 07/28/8s
� � � , ����7�
9. 8/15/89 Final Order: �Ac uiring a permanent Approved 3-0
utility easement for the ARCADE/MINNEHAHA
AREA SEWER SEPA TION PROJECT. Part of
Lot 15, Johns�on 's Subd. of Block 112 of
Lyman Daytons ,Ad ition.
10. 8/15/89 Final Order: �Ac uiring permanent and Approved 3-0
temporary utilit easements under and
across part of L ts 10 thru 12, Block 12,
Merrills Divis�io of Rice Street Villas
for the ALBERMAR E/NEBRASKA SEWER
SEPARATION PRQJE T.
11. 8/15/89 Final Order: IAc uiring certain lands for Two-week
the WESTERN/ATWA ER PONDING PROJECT. layover
12. 8/15/89 Final Order: C�on tructing a concrete curb Approved 3-0
on MINNEHAHA AVE UE between Stroh Drive
and vacated Grtee brier Street. This is a
part of the ARCA E/MINNEHAHA STREET PAVING
AND LIGNTING P�RO ECT.
13. 8/17/89 Ratification o�f ssessments: Constructian Approved 3-0
of concrete c�rb on MINNEHAHA AVENUE
between Stroh Drive and vacated Greenbrier
Street. This !is part of the
ARCADE/MINNEH�HA TREET PAVING AND
LIGHTING PROJ CT.
14. 8/15/89 Ratification of ssessments: For Approved 3-0
installation df anitary sewer service
connections inci ntal to the
JACKSON/SYCAMdRE TORM SEWER SYSTEM.
15. 8/8/89 Ratification of ard of Damages: Approved 3-0
Acquisition ofi a art of Lot 1 , Block 19,
Beaver Lake Heig s for the intersection
of ALGONQUIN a'nd OKOMIS STREETS to meet
M.S.A. standards.
16. Resolution 89-�13 : Authorizing proper Approved 3-0
City officials t execute an agreement
with MnDOT for' r onstruction of I-35E
from Jackson t�o e Cayuga Bridge.
(Referred to Com ittee 7/25/89) .
17• Resolution 89-131 : Authorizing proper Approved 3-0
City officials t execute an agreement
with the State o Minnesota for
maintenance resp sibilities on trunk
highways withi�n t e City limits. (Referred
., to Committee 7/2 89) .
��--/�{7�i
� �������.��.,.���►:� ,.., .
.� �� �
_ �,.
.. .
� �
_ �. _ ��
Council��ile No.:8�-1245- , gerJ.C�o,sx►itz.Tom IlituoYtd—� ` ;
, -Inthemattert�fti�a t,�ra#b�efits.cqstpndt�enges'forca�tFtt� , j
, ' o€cotfsr�te cunb�ot�°�' ve,laetweea St�h]�.��,q�c�ted Gs�eanbri�r-,.
St.T'his ss��.�art of tbe Ac�c ina�eha Stre�Aa�aB aqd�htinB�3l4'�`i�
Voting�/ards 6&T. �
T11e asses�uent af be it�, aniiYex;.xnses for a�d in�ction%�vith t�e:
above improv�mept.#�aui. 's�b�ittc+d t�o--the CwunailF and th+e:Gounail. •
having considered seine-an f. the said ass,�s�ment satufackory.the�efore,b� '
it
B�SULVED� Thalk�xhe ae .assessmez�t.be ;�n� f.l�e���an� is he�+sb�.in��►11
respecis'aDPro�red ,. �;, � -
, RESOLVED FUR'�HER :` t a public hear,��ag_be��,on satd eat on
the 17th day of August,1989 t hour of 9 o'cloeac A M�in�the Ca�uunda���'
of o yr il Buildi:�g, in the City oi"St. Pat�1; t��tt'fhe '
Director of Finance give n t[c of said �etings,'aus reqt�i�bq ttie Charb�r,
s�tating in said notice th �t' e and place of .hearii�,-Y� .aatu�e o�:�Ehe
impro�ement, and the amo nt sesse�ag,�inst the lot or lats of ti�e particuiar
owner Lo whom the notice' di ted.,..._ _ � •
File No. 18454-SS Ass�ssme +N :2594.
Adopted b�i ttie C+oiincil' ui 3,19�. T � , `
APP��d Jut�14. 1989. i' - :
•- -_.. ��'�g'��r' , Q: