89-1401 WMITE - CITV CIERK � _/�i
� PINK - FINANCE COUI1C11
CANARV - OEPARTMENT G I TY O F I NT PA U L
BLUE - MAYOR File NO.
RETURN COPY TO REAL ESTATE CO�/LCZ esolution "r�!
DIVISION - ASSESSMENT CT. � � ;
ROOM 218
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date ��/�
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS , on May 8 , 1989 , Me�vin Ro h pa3.d off two assessments ( 1
street impa�ovement and 1 wate� a n) fos pa�ope�ty �.ocated at
Neb�aska Ave. E. (PIN 21-29-11-14- 1 0) lega�ly desc�ibed as :
Exc.ept the East 40 feet , L t 3 and a�� of Lot 2 ,
B�ock 1 , Roth ' s Pha�.en V e 2nd Addition
( on Nebaaska between At�. n iG and Chambe�c) , and;
WHEREAS , on May 9 , 1989 , Mr. Roth e lized he shou�d not have
pai.d off these assessments because o a negotiated ag�eement
between himself and the new owne� , a d ;
WHEREAS , Ma. Roth has �equested th ea� Estate Division to
aefund $2 ,057. 97 for the st�eet im � vement and $640. 69 fo� the
watea� main, and seinstate the asse s ents to the p�opesty so they
can be col�ected with the p�ope�ty t xes ove� the 20 yea�
insta�lment peaiod.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , that t Real Estate Division is
authoa�ized to sefund Ms. Roth $2 , 6 8. 66 and �einstate these
assessments to the p�ope�ty to be o�lected with the p�ope�ty
taxes.
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:
Yeas Nays
Dimond Flri �.nr SPrvi rE,c
�-�+�- [n Favor
Gosw;tz `
Rettman � B �- .. irector �
sc6e;be� _ Against Y
.s�
w���o /��
��j � Q 1� Form Appr ved by Cit Attorney �^"
Adopted by Council: Date f°' n
< / ri
Ceetified P-s Council retary BY �'��
sy r
A►pproved b � r. Date �� � Appro e by Mayor for S b i to Council
BY —
� ` i���'� pU611Sl� AU G 1 1989
� ��'�����
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNGL+ DA IN ATED
Finance Department/Real Estate 7/ sis9 GREEN SHEET NO. 3 9 71
CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE �NITIAU DATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �} CITY COUNCIL
Roxanna Flink , • 292-7028 N � �CITY AITORNEY �qTY CLERK
MUST BE ON COUNpI AOENDA BY(DAT� �BUDOET WRECiOR �FIN.d MOT.SERVICE3 DIR.
�MAYOR(OR ABSISTAN �
TOTAL N OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 ( P A L LOCATIONS FOR SICiNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Refund assessment payments paid by t e ller and reinstate them to the property to be
paid by the buyer through the proper xes.
RE �}VE
AECOMMENOATIONS:Approvs(N o►�1�(� ��� CO NC) COMMITTEE/RESEARCH i�PORT OPTIONAI.
_PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMM1831d�1 89 Y3T , � ���� PHONE NO.
_q8 COMMITTEE _ � •r r
' �.+ .. ME :
—oistaicr couar _ (��f.::.:� O� Tt'i� I�II�ECTOR
'�'� �� � f •`��'�'"��'N?0� FINANCE
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNdL OBJECTIVE4 N/A�":�'�'�'i'$ ti :i� ;,��,�yH��M�NT SERVICES
INITIATINO PROBLEM,188UE,OPPORTUNITY(INho,What,When,Where,Why)
Mr. Roth inadvertantly paid off two a se sments he had negotiated with the new owners to be
assumed. (A) (B)
ADVANTACiE3 IF APPROVED:
The City would collect the assessment i cluding interest with the taxes.
D1811DVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
None
DI3ADVANTACiES IF NOT APPROVED:
None
Council Research Cent�
�UG 1 19$�
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION 2�698.66 COST/REVENUE BUDQETED(CIRq.E ON� YE8 NO
FUNDINO SOURCE PIR ACTIVITY NUMBER 802-60002 & 850-28000-9503
FlNANqAI INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
� , . . , , .
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are preferred routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes suthorized COUNCIL RESOWTION (Amend, BdgtsJ
budget exists) Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Initlating Department 2. Budget Director '
3. City Attorney 3. CNy Attomey
4. Mayor , . 4. Mayor/AssistaM
5. Finance&Mgmt Svcs. Director 5. Ciry Council
6. Fnance Accounting 6. Chief Accountant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others)
Revision) and ORDINANCE
1. Activiry Manager � � ' 1• '�riitiating Department Director
2. Department Accountanf . 2. Ciry Attorney
3. DepartmeM Director;.. , 3. �Ma�or/Assistant
4. Budget Director ' ' ` �•� �tY Council
5. Ciry Gerk
6. Chief Accountant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. InRiating Department
2. Ciry Attorney
3. MayodAssistant
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to axomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete seMences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEI(iHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION).(SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by Iaw/
charter or whether there are specific wa s in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will bene8t from this pro�ecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is pasaed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service7 Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenuel
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tallor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in generai you must answer two questfons: How much is it
going to cost7 Who is going to pay?
. � � •
�� � � ��o�
�
i Melvin Roth
I 1474 E. Shore Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55106
I
May 14� 1 89
Ms. Roxanna Flink
Department of Finance and Manage en Services
218 City Hall
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Dear Ms. Frank: �
Last Wednesday, May 10, 19 9, I spoke to you about a problem that
had surfaced regarding an asses me t payment on Monday, May 8, 1989.
On that day I paid the ass�ss ents in full on three parcels of land.
In August of 1988 I had negotia ed to sell one of the parcels and I had
agreed to not pay off the asses me ts on that particular parcel so that the
buyer could make the assessment pa ents as he could financially handle
them.
I had completely forgotten ou discussion about that until Tuesday,
May 9, 1989, when we were goin to close the transaction.
My request at this time i f a refund on this parcel so my buyer can
make these payments at his own di cretion. Please advise me about this
matter as soon as possible. I i my understanding that this matter would
have to go to the City Council would appreciate your early response
to my request.
Thank you.
Sinc re y,
Mel in oth
P.S. The parcel of land is: Lo 2, Block 1 and the West 30 feet of Lot 3 -
Roth's Phalen View, Sec 'nd ddition.
Property I.D. - 21-29-2�-1 -100
Improvement No. 2575 I
Project No. 18467
The amount that should e efunded is $2057.97 and $640.69 a total
of: $2698.66.
� •
I
I
_ _ � •
����"�'�d/
J iy ii, 1989
Ms. Roxanna Flink
Department of Finance and Man ge ent Services
218 City Hall
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Dear Ms. Flink:
It is our understanding a in order for Mr. Melvin Roth to get his
refund on the assessments pai o May 8, 1989 a letter would have to be
sent to the City Council acce ti the responsibility for the assessments
due on the property involved.
We purchased the propert e lier this year and our agreement with Mr.
Roth was that we would pay the as essments on the property known as "except
the East 40 feet, Lot 3 and a Lot 2, Block 1, Roth's Phalen View 2nd
Addition.
Mr. Roth, when paying the as essments for his remaining property had
forgotten our agreement and pa'd ssessments for the property we were
purchasing.
We hereby agree that we a e esponsible for any assessments on said
property and will pay these as es ments when due. The parcel of land is:
Lot 2, Block 1 and th West 30 feet of lot 3 -
Roth's Phalen View S cond Addition.
Property I.D. - 21 29 22-14-100
�mprovement No. 2 75 ,�r�v� ��lr.,n,�,����,�: ti'� ���`'1`
Project No. 18467 p��cT��%'� ���5`�
The amount that should be re unded is $2057.97 and $640.69 a total
of: $2698.66.
,
�-�,(�. _ �
chael E. Luger
� a�-Q,�,�� V� .� ti'
Darlene B. Luger