89-1060 - .......�1
�� J
City of St.Paul CO CIL FILE NO. � ��d
r ;,
FINAL ORDER IN � ` �
B f ..
.� . . , ,
CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS �� No. �� '��g+""
Votieag
W�_
3 In the Matter of
GOfl�t�A� l1� aAd i:akia� pt��aa�at utiiity e aes�aata sud t ffiporary
conskrnctioa a�maeaaats for ti�• 8YL9Ai�{ACiCSR � 8tors Sers� S g�ration
Pro�ect oe� under and acra+rs prap��tie+� deo�r t�+e as t�llors�
A perpstnal �astwset te�r pt�blic at li � p�rposes ovs , uader,
+31�d tCTGY� t�ie fsllaria,� �/t0�l�.�lld r0 •l't�Ai3
Tbs�t part ot tha ��ecthtr�st Q�art�r i the 8or�thw�st Q srter of
Section 30, ?ow�aship 29, R�e�$s 82N a�ssy Ca�ntr, �i a�escta,
alescri.bed as ioilo�s=
?he west 10 feet of L�ts 1 a d 2 ,, � leck 1 , 3ilscn ' a
Subdfvisio�; tha north 2S �'t+eE a� t� rest 10 fao�t i Lot 3.
Elock I , Jilsoa •� Sn�►divisi�n; t s est ta fe�t oi Lot 21 ,
Hlack 4� Lyto�a's Addl,cian.
?ogetbar with � tt�eparas�► eonstruct o easl��nt over ud across
th• v�st ! S t�eE e►! Lot• 1 � 2 s� 3 , �2o�k � R Jilson ' �a
SnDBiv#siom ; t�e �r�rt 2g iest o ot 21 , Bloc�C 4 Lyton ' o
Additiaa.
..,. -�-
under Administrative Order appro ed
" under Preliminary Order �" y-"��� appr ed -" ����
1
A public hearing having been had upon the above improvement u on ue notice, and the Council having heard
all persons, objections and recommendations relative thereto, and having fu ly c nsidered the same; therefor , be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby or ers aid improvement to be ma e
FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Council hereby determines that the stat required Wr this improveme t be as describ-
ed above, and tGat the proper City officers submit a repott Lo the City C �no 1 for Lhe putpose ot the Coun il's making an
award of damages for the interest�and detetmination of asaessments it y, against the benetited pro erty.
acquired
COUNCILMEN Adopted y Council: Date
JU 1 3198A
Yeas D��� Nays
6t#Switz /� Certified Council ecreta
��� Y� In Favor By t
R�tt ta�az
Setl�eibe 1 0 �
� Against �—�-
Mayor
W:�.� � JUN � �
ptte tSt� JUN 2 41989
, � RE 4/19/89 ������d
DEPARTMENTlOFFl NqL DATE INITIATED
Firiance & Ma.nagement Services 4/19/89 GREE HEET BS �
CONTACT PERSON 3 PHONE INITULLI DATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT 01 CITY OOUN L
Peter White 298-5317 � �� �CITY ATTORNEY [�cxrv a.�r
MUBT 8E ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY DAr��4 �� �9 IIOUTNIO �BUOOET DIRE �FlN.8 MOT.�RVI�8 DIR.
Must be in City Cf er s ce no �MAYOR(OR A881 a �l C 1 Re a ch
TOTAL#►OF SIGNATURE PA6E3 (CUP ALL LOCATION8 FOR 81 NA RE)
ACTION REWESTED:
Setting hearing date for Sylvan/Acker acquisition
Approve acquisition of permanent and temporary construc io easements for the
Sylvan/Acker combined sewer separation program. File ��18542E-3
REOOMMENDATIONS:MP►ovB W or ReleCt�F� c�uac��coMM�rr�►na+ oPTioruu.
_PLANNiNG C�AMISSION _qVll SEfiVICE COMMI8810M ��YST PHONE NO.
_GB O�AMITTEE _
�STAFF _ COMMENTS:
_DIS'fAICTOOURT WarA 5
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNqL�JECTIVE?
INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORiUNRV(Who,�Nhet.Whsn,Where,�Nhy):
The construction and future maintenance of the above- nt oned storm sewer p o�ect
requires the easements described on attachment "A" and ho on the attached ap.
ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: �
These permanent and temporary easements will facilitat t building of the a ove-mentioned
storm sewer. The result will be more efficient and ec o 'c routing of the s orm water
runoff.
aSADVANTAOEB IF APPROVED:
The permanent easements will became an encumbrance to e roperties involved
DISAOVANTA4ES IF NOT APPROVED:
Could not install sewers as planned
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION = 8•500 C08T/REVEN ED(CIRCLE ONE) �YES� J�10
�uNa�osour� Storm Sewer System Charge ACTIVITYNU 0130(�03:C'.dC;� �e� ��'C�l C�:�i�t"
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPWN) � •' �'�'�
ri�� n ' i: �;�
� e� �, V
w • ;� y � -
_ . � +
�NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are preferred routings fo�the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend, Bdgts./
budget exists) Accept. Grarits)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Initiating Department 2. Budget Director
3. City Attorney 3. Ciry Attorney
4. Mayor 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Finance&Mgmt Svcs. Director 5. City Councfl
6. Finance Accounting 6. Chief Accountant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs. �
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others)
Revision) and ORDINANCE
1. Activiry Manager 1. lnitiating Department Director
2. Department Axountant 2. Gry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. MayodAssi�aM
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. Gty Clerk
6. Chief Accountent, Fin &Mgmt Svcs.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. Initiating Department
2. Ciry Attomey
3. MayoNAssistant
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and e�erCl��i
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projectlrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete seMences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION,NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLEt'E LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
COUNCIL COMMITTEEIRESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REGIUESTED BY COUNCIL
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the skuation w conditlons that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific wa in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this pro�ict/actbn.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past prxesses might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, nofse,
tax increases or assessments)7 To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES iF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised actfon is not
approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
acxident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANGAL IMPACT
Although�rou must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to costT Who is going to pay?
�S- � o � .
� y N � � � � �
� O o� --�
� � i � N � t \ v � � :
� - �— �— --y
� � � ~ \ N � _I ^�;7
' � + � ~ � � � N I � ,
� v .�::...
�•
� W C� f� v 1` _ ^ �(� �0 i......
N � , _ a � � v , . ...
�- F W � � — - - - - --� . ..,.
Q �:;.
� 1�1 �1 v b Q. 'h �O �� '.....
W W ' N � � � it :
� -
W Z N � v-; � � � e�. v h �� :.z.s
� � O �•�•ioi � •io o� ic so r • o�
Q � 1� o
� � �
t T � � ��o � rsi
�i o.s Iti .,ti [`j� � f' •// ^ •t ^p ti o i/ M � S¢(�. �� . �. .. .� L Z OS
� "— �. I� r, f' lV �: .�. .. ^ �
J V! �R N
�
178 h � Z ^ N ln r S �o ao '�' ( � �
�, d F � � � � z N � � ._ = r. o I� � `
.� o N .. ' M � � � V ^ F o � — --- „ r- c� a1 � v♦
� ,r .�� 1� ^� N �, � � I
� � L � �
�` � i � r � � � ^ ' v �
v �' W `Z OC V� � = M � .�. �� ._.
� A Q -. � . N oi � „ �� L 2 - — - ---- -�
�
,, . . � � Z M � � � �, � _ . � �,� ,�r, ; o�s
; ` � `Z 4 aO„ `o � " "' � � �
`^ o _
,., . _ � .
. _ �. � � �' ; -`-' __ � a � �
^ ^ v ``
� � Z L�1 W W ~ � � ^� N " ^� 8 � � �, v' ao udj
� y! v �
� N � N w " , ; � �.. � � � `_`i� � 4�� _ �� = M o g �, r. � O �'
\ � � � J <.r ^ � P a � �� � � �.
a� a "' o "'
. �i v T ; v M A ^'' " w t[1
`9� ,{:..,
� . ��o�s �'/,+l� (!! ,:� � � � � � P �t- cy�'
, `-Y.s :t r o,S ,ss. --
� � i N N N i
�d 7 7 .E S- _ - - -�f..� = ? � � � .s zi o .sz i � I os . � —
� � N:J j` `1 M s h1 �' a p ti s M • ` ` (h I
_ � I ��'.'�M til o '�z� � Q �. � � � �� � I �
' ^ti,I N � - r : ; ` N � ` —
�i 1_ (�
sh`�.� „ N r � � N (� N \ �n w �'� al � � t�►
`' ^� N � �J
-s I �F��E � � � '� • � ►.. I
^� Y ^� O N N N � �� �S2/ �
: \ � s '
S'[f /.S`�1 `` y H N N ----
� � g � N s•B�. „ „ �� s��' nr' �
o \ o � ~ � H o � ^• �+ � � ho r = b
N �
� � a I o
�' ., 918 � �� 008 � t � � � � �
� � eu �n ln �o ti. b
� �n � N � '� �
L � /f Y .. 'ti �� j' w . 'li N � _ � u�« � C � �
ZZ$ �•' °' > I
0 0
� ,� s� ! �' � � -� ,o � ,, s�F' sF' . --- - 3'f--- -� -s--
o e �y�dd --- °� o _o Q- - �5� - - - - - - -- - --o I -
� � � � � ,� � � `dd � � �s
� ', £ o ��l'� � ,�p � :s�. ,►.- - -�� -- -�� - -�� S'/f- E- � --- --- ------ - -- -.ss
N 6�e �, �, ° �' �, °' " � �i� 6 s� i I
= o„ � h ' I
s IrE' j''t � ' j!i S!t .. .. �z � =� * � nl M � � 7, ( � 1�
a� � � l►t N _ , � � � ,
° �1 �
� � � o� M �1 �0 ��`1 N �o N s.. ' (� I �
- I � o � 's gE' ., �, � �
'l E ^ ~ t � �1 ' . o - � .►
�f- � � � �� r = ~ SZ/ Z .f7/ N I� -- - -- - -
� �
N � N :?i'. �•v .� �i H � � � —. 0 � I Y �
-- °�► � o M ;� , o�� N � � = � 1
\ �° ^ � � N � _ �V
= o 0 o a N 3 r H � ~ — `-'-- - �
N t�F s'.L� � �".L�h - � t` ^ �'w�"' N �� c � � oou��1� �(�°_°• I �
li Z � " __1_ Q
'Lis' ,.l�Y'f f� ^p n N I
` ._ �, � � � � N � N � i � � 1,�
_ A ^ � � y� � A '
4?J38N�CHYN .. `^� O ., � �, =: sz. _- z 9 �-� ,s ss� ----
u, -rT � t['ff �i[s� � ,� O ^ - --^ .. � 06�) �
.�v 1 � �`' 0 'q � � L` �V � � S7 oE' OE' 0 9 PI �, � „ n 87
�:_ „� � � � �. �
�-- � � � + ^ FGM Ir� �^ � � ^ � N . ••� � � � ��� , � (op M
�0- � Wa e�y 41 � °� � 0 � r'w1 � N_ v � -� O v '.,_ „ C
1 Vl �� � i ,� �� M r'� � Ls/I � N y �z .YE I/ I y ... � N '�P o� � \• R �') y Q :� O I /w �p� �� �V
N ' O ", M c, , \ � 1,\ � ` \ O� ��i N i
N -� �- ���° =- .. Z � � ti '' �:� - - . ��►
* p _ _ — oo �
sI « 3 ti '! d'lE O�f �, u p/� p �O h _ N � �
.. ��' a o r
� - ..
^ -• � --
�. , r. ,, r i. .. « f z /' � tf�
, �
� 1'r� f l� e ,� � 0 �I O �..� = P
.�. n � N 1_ �'' l�l
� w1 � P 0 \ d` `�l � .� u '� � '�, l m O+ v
�- � a `- � 'v � � � � `� p N .-. G
t- 4, �o (� ao n o�" — �_v �oo � ' �p a'E ..._ � t» �h h v ti AD � � ° :G 'N �'1 Q' �'1 V
. ' °�h ' � ,�, ' Q
zi8 i,�� � ' �� � , I
_g
. „ s ..r Sd osf �, �� O of' OF_ t7 �. S O ,. 0i' 4, p� I7 . YZ
. ..�
' .�
�
. �������d
� M mbers:
` ��� CITY OF S PAUL R ger J. Goswitz, chair
���1��;;;; Ja ice Rettman
„�� ����, . OFFIOE OF THE C T COUNCJIL T m Dimond
"����� Date: June 7, 1989 R CEIVED
Committe port �u o�1989
To: Saint Paul City Council ci Y c�.ERK
From :Public Works, Utilities, a d ransportation
Committee �
�
Roger J. Goswitz, Chair '
1. Approval of minutes of May 31, 19 9. �
Hearing Date ` �
2. 6/13/89 VACATION: Petition of the Port Au hority, Twin Approved 3-0
.� City Testing and Michael E. Ry n or the
vacation of MYRTLE STREET betw en Cromwell
Avenue and Pelham Blvd. Purpo e s to expand
Twin City Testing facility.
3. 6/13/89 RATIFICATION OF AWARD OF DAMAG S: Condemning Approved 3-0
and taking a permanent utility ea ement under with
and across Lot 28, Block 4, Ri e treet Villas stipulations
.for the ALBEMARLE/NEBRASKA ARE S WER PROJECT.
' Easement required by the MWCC.
4. 6/13/89 RATIFICATION OF AWARD OF DAMAG S: Condemning Approved 3-0
and taking temporary easements in conjunction
with the reconstruction of the MA YLAND/JESSIE
intersection.
5. 6/13/89 FINAL ORBE#t: Condemning and t ki g permanent Approved 3-0
utility easements and temporar c nstruction
easements for the SYLVAN/ACKE ST RM SEWER
PROJE T.
6. 6/13/89 RATIFICATION OF AWARD OF DAMA S: Condemning and Approved 3-0
taking permanent utility ease nt for the
SYLVAN/ACKER SEWER PROJECT. ( m ded order to
be required) .
� 7. ACQUISITION: of property for he SYLVAN/ACKER Approved 3-0
pond from Glacier Park Compan . with
amendment.
1`-_--
C1T'Y HALL SEVENT'H FLUUR • SAINT PAUL. MINNFSOTA 55102
b�'
8. 6/20/89 FINAL ORDER: Improving the alleys in Block 26, Laid over in
Chas. Weide's Subd. of Blocks 25 and 26 of committee to
Arlington Hills Addition by grading alley to the 6/21.
easterly North-South alley and grading and
paving the westerly North-South alley from Sims
Avenue to the north line of Lot 24 in said Block
26. Also construct a sewer in the alley for
storm water purposes. Also for slope
construction in the above said alley grading and
paving. (Project bounded by Edgerton, Sims,
Payne and York) .
9. RESOLUTION 89-862: Amending the 1989 budget by Approved 3-0
adding 5196,888 to the Financing and Spending with
. Plans for Public Works performance improvement amendment.
activities. (Referred to Committee 5/18/89) .
10. ORDINANCE 89-896: An ordinance amending Chapter
71 of the Legislative Code pertaining to house
�. numbering and requiring building permits within Approved 3-0
one year after a waiver is granted. (Referred
to Committee 5/23/89) .
11. RESOLUTION 89-907: Approval for use of MnDOT Approved 3-0
payme�t for easements taken on KELLOGG MALL for
Kellogg Mall Park construction.
, 12. RESOLUTION: to authorize City officials to
' exec�te an Agreement with Minnesota Department
of Transportation for cost participation for Approved 3-0
EAST 7TH STREET RETAINING WALL over Bridge No.
90386 between Payne Avenue and Mounds Blvd.
13. RESOL.UTION 89-323: Plan to phase out certain Laid over in
water systems. (Laid over in Committee committee
5/31/89) . until 6/21.
14. DISCUSSION: Street and Al1ey Assessment Laid over in
Notices. committee
until 6/21.
15. RESOLUTION 89-1013: Authorizing proper City Approved 3-0
officials to execute an agreement with Minnesota
Po�lution Control Agency pertaining to
stormwater into the Mississippi River and
arr�nding the 1989 budget by adding $150,000 to
th� Financing & Spending Plans for Public Works
Sewer Service Enterprise Fund. (Referred to
Cornmittee 6/6/89) .
- � ������
' PRELIMINARY O DE
Council File No. 89-807—By Janice Rettman—
In the Matter of condemning and taking rrn nent utility easements an
temporary construction easements for the S Vat /Acker Area Storrn Sewc
Separation Project an,under and across prap es cribed as follows in Votin
Ward 5:
A perpetuai easement for public utiiity pu os over, under,and across th
following describ�d properties: "
That part of the Southwest Quarter af the out west Quar.ter af Section 30
Township 29, Range 22W,Aamsey County, _i�n esota, described as follows:
The west 10 feet of Lots 1 and 2>.Black 1, i1sQ '.s Subdivision; the north 2
feet oi the west 10 feet of Lot 3,Blcek I,Jil n's ubdivision;the west IO fee
of Lot 22,Block 4, Lyton's Addition,`
Together�+vSth a tetnporary constructian�a s t over and across the west 1
feet of Lots f;2 and 3,Block 1,3ilson's Su i�tis on;the west 20 feet of�t 21
Biock 4,.I'.�on's A�dition. ;
The Cowieil o�f the Gity of SaintPAu2 hav� � iyed:the•report of the Mayo
upon the-=above impsctvement, and'���avit�g 'dered said<-,-report, hereb
resolves� .. :�.
L Ttlat the.said report and the is hereby approved :wi�th n
alternatives, and that tk�e estimated 4 ereof_is $8,509 fin�r�ced b
Sewer�eparation Charge.
2. 'That a public�hearing be hac� on said p ovement on the�.I�o
�une 1989 t 3:00 o'clock s.m.,in the ou ' il Chambers of t e � y a
a� ourt ouse ui ing#n.the City� f.S'.' L Paul.
3. That riotice of said public hearing be giv n to,the persons and in th
rnanner provided by the Charter,stati g e time and place of hearin ,
the nature of the improvement and th tot 1 cost thereof as estimated.
�'ile No. 18542E-3 . .
Adopted by the Council May 9, 2989. '
• Approved May 10,2989.
(May 2Q, 198