The URL can be used to link to this page

89-1058 33 CITY OF ST. PAUL C UNCIL FILE NO. —" � Il ` FINAL ORDER ---�► B ` � s-, F e No. �4"� as►d 8-89-07 Voting In the Matter of Ward DIEW SIDB�iALR CONSTxUCTIO�t to e cc�nstracted to a widtA of fire(5) feet for the following projectss 7 S-89-O6 3outh ai e BSANST AVBltIIS rs� �tna St. to HaselNOOd � . aad Haat sid• b A STSBBT fro■ R ans� Ave. to Ensli Ave. 7 5-89-07 Both side ILSON A9EHIIB fra White Bear Ave. to Ruth St. *ES?IliATED CONSTRUCTION C08TS A D ATLS �BSIDEIiTIAL rates (SIHGLB FAMI Y 0 THxES FAMILY) l�or a 5-foot wide sidewalk: K anstraction (�rh re no walk existed) , S 13.00 p�r f'ront f oot ; �.` All corner rea.ideatial praperti a vill receire a r�dit up to Che first - 15Q feet of sidevalk along an utting the "lo g sfd�" of the property. � COMNESCIAL rates (all progerty t er thaa residential) � 100x of actual cost esti'stad t e agproxinately' $�i.00 per aqaare foot ` - of valk constracted. I' under Preliminary Order o � � approved �O�7" ' �' The Council of the City of Saint Paul h co ducted a public hearing up n the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the ty harter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all perso s, o jections and recommendati ns pertaining to said proposed improve- ment and has fully considered the same; now, t ref re, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of int Paul does hereby orde that the above-described improvement � be made, and the proper City officers are hereby irec ed and authorized to proce d with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the c mpl tion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate ali expenses incurred therein and shall report the sa e t the City Council in accorda ce with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. � � -/�3-�9 COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Co ncil: Date YeasDl�1lld Nays GoMEt " Certified Passed by Council Secretary �g ' ltettsau In F vor By Schat�I SoruaeM Agai st iTilsos Mayor r_. � .:: , ° �„ ..�: ;.= r;:< = . yc:. . . ° RETURN CbPY T0 Yl�t�'��A$SES�NIENT `IV 1011! ' � , : ,.- � . ,. . .; � .. RooN��8. . t , , 3j �� , , � , .. . � ;. . _ , . .,� . . . ._ �.:_ .� , f .. . - ' _ � G�Y OF ST.PAUL : � . .F _ � �.�I�.B:�IO. �� . _ . � FtN`AL �Ot�[3ER= -: ; fB ., '� , � � ; _ � _ ��,,; � � . . , . �� N�,. �#*�#� a� f�7'` s _ ( .� ° _ '� j � y; . . �t�rtirt� ��t ihe Matter o . _ ,��, �� ;� �slt slDt�f.� C�i�ltltC3l�s -e� sa�t�t�� a �ri�t1�. �'� f�.T�t3�.. ��- � �: tor t�t l+�3lebriss tr��asts s . . ;i �.., . : � � . ;, »r 7 i-�l-0� i�stl► �r# ;1�EZ; �tT��i ss.,.._�slt ts. �r _ ; . . ° �t�i��i- t a� � a saa� .�ti+i�e: ♦ llt�iT icas �a�i at+r�. R�� . � . , .., � - �l�87 #�ti af' ' � t�� ' �i,��e �is� lia�: .iE , :��tti ft. , �:. , - . � .,:: . � " '��?Ift1►l�.D ��!`�UClY�� i�ili � ?!i `�j � , '. . ' rwr.w.�.rr�r +��wr�.■�.■ �...r�r�� _- � .. ., ,`�� . - � � � � . . ,1�` . � � ,. �� +�� w�� ' � ��i�� . � .. .. . J � . .. ..� '.,� d .`' �lr: a — �� til+r •ta+r�ra��: 1t• ��reela� t•ti ♦ �► �ralt eYi�..tar�3, - #��8�8. N�t�t ��'�qtt. t+sot; ... . . ><. .' �1�. eoras�, s�r��t��si�l tl�t�rt � 11 �r+�e��r�r a s#3t �� t��t� ��iest , ; �,�� i+rr�. .�t it��t1t aia�s �tw� t� '*I• �i1�". ot, t� �!!er�+ �.; �l�C��►t ��ttt� �sZl t��st� , t r tlas s+�si!#s sl� �� Y'= ' f attta� t�st ssti�a��ti a�r►r�st�.�lf t.08 �+�s �r�rar�:��t � . .' ,�.r+�' !��.�`i�� ,�Sil��t#��• � '' � � �. � untler Prelimi�ary Order �� °� , :a�pproYed' , �� . " . _ ��„ _ _�':"... , �.. �-. �".� -�._.: � The CounciI,of the� Gity of Saint PauL h co ducted a public '}�earing u n the above ttnprovement, due notice thereo#' having bep�[ give�:�as prescribed by tfie ty harter; and � :.. � W#iEREAS, The Council has hear8 all pers s, jections and recommenda ns_p�aining to said proposed improve-- ment and has fully co�sidered the same;now, re re, be it ' � ` '`' RES�LVED;�That the Council of the City of aint Paul does hereby:,or that Eiie alwye-described improvem�t ` , . be made, and the prpper City officers are hereby 're ed and auth�rized to proc d with the improvemet�t; and�be it �' FURTHEYt 'RFSOLYED; That upon the - m tion.of said. �r�vetnent the p�n�r Citq officers shali•calculate . ' ' �,..a�l expenses incurrtci'there�n and shall repc�rt-tht e.t the City Ccwr��racs�t�d ce:w'ith Ct��pter 14.ef the City Charter. . :, . . , , . � :�- � � � , , :; , � , , -. . 2.. -��-�� .�`�� ., - COUNCIL PERSON - .Adopted by the uncii: Date;- , ; Yeaa»�� Iays . . . `� , � `_ . ;, � Cer3ified�assed Council Secretacy� , . �, _ ��* , � � , _„ = .: In vo By _ �.-. Ag st _ . � , ' ,, . Mayor .: : �- ..J . . - _ � . - ,, ,. � .. - -_,../" �� _ _,� I , , , V&A 3/22 89 ��_�Q�� , * . DEPARTMENTlOFFICEIWUNqI DATE INITIATED 1 �3 3 Publ ic Works Sidewalks 2/28/89 REEN SHEET No. CONTACT PERSON�PFIONE INITIAU DATE' INITIAUDATE ARTMENT DIRECTOR �qTY COUNGL Thoma s P. Keef e - 292-6283 �� ATTORNEY �qTY CLERK UST BE ON CQUNq�ACiENDA Y(DA7q 3 �� g9 ROU7�10 B ET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MOT.BERVICE8 DIR. ust be in ity G�lerlc's ce no M pp(pq A�IgTq � ou c i Re TOTAL#�OF 81QNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL l0 ATI NS FOR SIQNATURE) ACTION REOUESTED: ' B.S. WILSON AVE. - White Bear Ave� to Ruth S � Ward 7) Fl� �• S� yO� This is new const�uction � requested by 37 s gn rs of petition. RECOMMENDATIONS:Apprare W a ReJect(F� COUNqL COM E/RESEARCH REPORT OPTION ANALY8T PHONE NO. _PIANNINO COMMI8810N _CIVIL SERVICE OOMMISSION I _CIB COMMRTEE _ A STAFF _ COMMENTB: _DISTRICT COURT _ i �1PPORT3 WHipl COUNCIL OBJECTIVE9 j INITU1TiNa PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(Who,VVh�t,When.WMre.Why): I i I This order was initiated by petition� 37 pe pl affixed tfieir sigr� tures to it. Petltioners go on to explain the many problems resident c nfront tn havtng no sidewalk and reference one individual who was struck 6y a car in t e treet section and s in,Jured seriously. Many apartment buildings extst here and tFii a ea is well develop� commercially. ; � I ADVANTAOEB IF APPFiOVED: The community will benefit from this proj t cause it will prov de safe defect free side- walks for its many citlzens� .The sidewalk ntracts are executed y private contractors, so it follows that private sector Jobs are cr at as a resutt of t s activity. I DISADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: i Historically the sidewalk reconstructions av created negative � edback in the area of construction procedure and asses�ment. Sfm ly stated property ow ers detest assessments � and despite the fact up to one-half tt�e as es ment is City subsi ized, it sttll rema�ns controversial . .; �L;;":r::± !�'��,��;'ii1 �CII��' +'' '1� � � ;.;, 1':Ii�-�I� (� ci ;�-d>:� DI3ADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: his option would allaw the infrastructur o sidewalk stock to � eteriorate, which in turn ill generate more personal inJury suits� ul imately resulting the expenditure of larger ollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or re lacement , as well clatm pay outs. i � i' i � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 57�98O.00 � VENUE BUDOETE CIRCLE ON� YES NO 89-M-0658 A, PIA 89 = 384 00 A Ot -� 02150 FUNDiNG SOURCE = ACTIVITY NUMBER �wwau iN��+no�:c�P�� C� C I B 89 = 50 0o I 1 � F � NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE OREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAIIABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are preferred routings for the five most frequent rypes of documeMs: . CONTRACTS (assumes suthorized COUNCIL RE30LUTION (Amsnd, Bdgts./ budget exists) qccept. C,raMs) 1. Outside Agency 1. Departmont Director 2. Initiating Depertment 2. Budget Director 3. Gty Attorney 3. City Attorney 4. Mayor 4. MayoNAssi�tant 5. Finance&Mgmt 3vcs. Director 5. City Council 6. Fnance Accounting 6. Chief Axountant, Fin&Mgmt Sres. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all othera) Revision) and ORDINANCE 1. Activlty Manager 1. Initiating DepaRment Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Altorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor/Aasistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. Ciry Gerk 6. Chief AccouMant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) 1. Initiating DepaRmeM 2. City Attorney 3. MsyoNAasistant 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and� each of these pages. ACTION RE(,IUESTED . Descrlbe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- ' cal order or order of importance,whichever ls rtwst appropriate for the issue. Do not wrke complete sentences. Begin each item in your Iist with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been preaented before any body, publ�C or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVEI Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSINO, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION).(SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNCIL COMMITTEEIRESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your proJect or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are speclfic ways in which the City of SaiM Paul and its citizena will benefit from this pro�ecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past prxesses might - this projecUrequest produce ff rt is pasaed(e.g.,treffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how bng? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised actlon is not approved?Inebility to deliver aervice?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FlNANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? . . . �&a �2 �89 ��'i- �aSd� � � , DEPARTMENT/OFFlCEICOUNCIL ��I � 0 12 3 2 Pub 1 i c Works S i dewa i ks 2/ $/ GREEN S EET NO. OONTACT PER�N d PHONE ��PARTMENT DIRECTOR IN �� qTy 00lJNqL INITIAUDATE Thomas P. Keef e - 292-6283 �M �CITY AITORNEY �CITY CLERK MUBT BE ON COUNCIL ADENDA BY(DAT� 3 2g $9 ROU �BUDOET DIRECTOR FlN.�MOT.SERVICES DIR. Must be in City Clerk's Of ice no �i„u,Y��i� Counci 1 Researc TOTAL#OF 81GNATURE PAGES (CLIP LL OCATIONS FOR SIGNATU ACTION REQUESTED: S.S. REANEY AVE. - Etna St. to Hazelwo S . � E�S� ETNA ST. � Reaney Ave. to Bush Ave. (Wa rd 7) FI tE NO• S-�'�!•G6 This is new construction - requested b 35 signers of petitio � RECOMMENDATIONB:Approw(IU a RNect(F� COU CIL MITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT IONAL �Wq� PMONE NO. _PLANNIN(i OOMMIS310N _CYVIL 8ERVICE COMMISSION CIB COMMITTEE _ p coM rrcs _srn� — _D�'fRICT COURT — SUPPORTS WHN;FI COUNdL OBJECTIVE? INI'TIATINO PFiOBLEId,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,Whsn,Whsro,Wh�: This order was initiated by the 35 rnd vi al signers of a pei ition requesting this sidewalk be constructed. It will be a first t1m 1 stallation, and it ' s anticipated it will be very controverslal and heatedly contested� etitioners stressed pU ltc safety, principally for school children, and submitted very gr ph c plctures of thes� children, using the street , in their travels to and from school . ADVANTAf3E8 IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this p oJ ct because it will rovide safe defect free side- walks for lts many citizens� The sidew lk contracts are exec ed by private contractors, so it follows that prtvate sector Jobs ar c eated as a result this activity. DI8ADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED: j i Historically the sidewalk reconstructi ns have created negat� e feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessmentR Si ply sta�ed propert owners detest ��se�ssrnenLs� and despite the fact up to one-f�alf th a sessment ts City s�i s�,d(zed.� �t still4,r ains _J:.<�:�:: �•�nr!1C�rCii �el�i.�� controversial � I f�irit� 2 � �i;�� DISADVMITAOES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastruc ur af sidewalk stock� to deteriorate, which in turn will generate mare personal in,jury sui s, ultimately resulti g in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and or replacement, as we7 ) as claim pay outs. 19 305,00 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION i ! COST UE BU CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINO SOURCE 89-�"�-0658 A. P�/� $9 � 4� �� ACTIVITY NUMBER � A22�� - 02�5� FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • s � ' C, CiB 89 = 50, 00 ' � � . . , NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are preferred routings for the five most frequent types of dxumerns: CONTRACTS (assumes authorized COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend, Bdgts.! budget exists) Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. DepartmeM Director 2. Initiating DepaRment 2. Bud�t Director � 3. Clty Attorney 3. Gty Attomey 4. Mayor 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Finance�Mgmt Svcs. Director s. ary councii 6. Finance Accounting 6. Chief Accountant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others) �levision) and ORDINANCE 1. Activity Manager 1. Initiating DepartmeM Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attomey 3. Department Director 3. Mayor/AssfstaM 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. Ciry Clerk 6. Chief Axountant, Fin 8�Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) 1. Initiating Department 2. City Attomey 3. MayoNAssistant 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SI(iNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and a ercli each of these�ag�es. ACTION REOUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest eeeka to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order o�order of importan�,whicheve�is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete aerrtences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete If the iss�e in question hes been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Councll obJectNe(s)your proJecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSINCi, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION).(SEE COMPLETE UST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS HEGIUESTED BY COUNCIL INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED ,Indicate whether this is simpy an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are speciflc wa in which the Ciry of Saint Paul and its cftizens will beneflt from this pro��t/action. DISADVANTA(3ES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delay�, noise, tax increases or assessments)�To Whom?When? For how bng? DI3ADVANTA(iES IF NOT APPROVED What wtll be the negative conaequences if the promised actiop is not approved?Inability to deliver aervice?Continued high traffic, noiae, accident rate? Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you muat tailo�the informatlon you provide here to the issue�rou are addressing, in gerrerel you mu�ansvirer two qu�tions: How much is it going to cost?Who is gofng to pay? � ST. PAU ITY COU CIL C' G/ ,�� PUBLIC H RING N TICE ��o��, SIDEWALK 4NSTRU TI ON � � Pile o. S-89-06 Dear Property Owner: City ouncil District �� Plann'n District Council ��2 P U R POS E To consider the c ns ruction (new) and/ r reconstruction of all or part of the publi s dewalk in front of your property. The limits A N D of this project a e: South side REA EY AVENUE from Etna St eet to Hazelwood LO CATIO N Street and the ea t side ETNA STREET rom Reaney Avenue to Bush Avenue NOTE: Sidewalk c struction may cons st or replacing from one panel to all of 'th panels in front of your property. You may call the phone u ers listed below t find out how many panels are to be rep ac . Tuesday, June 13 1 89, at 9:00 A.M. H EA RIN G City Council Cha be s, Third Floor City Hall - Court House ---------------- ------------y- Please note that th Public Works Committee of the Cit Council will discuss this ite a d develop a recomme dation to the full City Council. Please br ng any unresolved c ncerns that yau may have rr, rhis meetin� n ednesday, May 31, 1989 in Room 707 City Hall - I ' � r- Members: ��1/�-5� � �'+ CITY�,, SAINT PAU Roger J. Goswitz, chair �3 Janice Rettman "j11°�" OFFIC� F TFIE CITY COUNCJI ''-=''�°j" Tom Dimond � " �� Date: May 31, 19 9 � Co ittee Report � . To: Saint Paul City Cou ci . . From :Public Works, Util ti s, and Transp rtation Committee � ::� Roger J. Goswitz, C air _; _ 1. Approval of minute o May 17, 1989. Hearing Date . 2. 6/6/8� FINAL ORDER: Acqu si ion of a part of Approved 3-0 Lot 1 , Block 19, B av r Lake Heights. P rpose is to bring ALGONQ IN STREET up to MSA standards. 3. 6/13/89 � FINAL ORDER: Side al construction and/ r . reconstruction at ol owing locations: S-8909 - North sid G ND AVENUE from S. Approved 3-0 Fairview to S. Whe le Street� S-8910 - North sid U IVERSITY AVENUE fro Approved 3-0 Pillsbury to Hampd n venue with integral curb; ___-.�._�,.�=�---�r,,.� ____ _....._�.__—..--.___. __. --__:�...�.�. -�- "'��8906 - South si e EANEY AVENUE from E na Laid Over to Hazelwood Stree , nd East side ETNA S REET Indefinitely from Reaney Avenue to ush Avenue; S-8907 - Both side WI SON AVENUE from Wh te Withdrawn - Bear Avenue to Rut St eet. CITY HALL SEVENTH FL U SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 �s � � ��,os� '�;,� _ ;�„i.�•,oa{ � - - M.��:� •�� 2'�. -T�s,y ^�' �si ] ��. !4C}�'�1P(:n`*4dM re ..•Y. J'�'pA'_5�t;- /Council File�.M��.,—,.�� `'y�� •�� ',�i�,�+ :��,,, In the M�r ot!� +�`*- ''`` �' �� five(5)feet fot t�e -.. „ r� � � '-�--._ Voting . - - Ward . . , , ,, 7 _5-89-06—S�qth side R� ey ve.irom Etas St. to Hazel ood St. and ` �ast`side E°�1'T ET frorn ReaY�eg Ave:to: ush Ave, � 7 �5-89-0?—BQ sf �W�i n e.from White Bear Ave.t' Ruth'St. 'ESTIMATED �g�i� . $+�Ti " �"!�3" . � �SIDEN'TIALrate�. _ ?�o�'��.FY�`"�,� - '"� .�f For a 5-foot wisie sidewalk:N w stru¢tiop(where no w�s st�d)�13:0�i�er f7AB�€�� .. ' ��.�. > } ,Jfi;." �.:?�� tn;, • .i ....a , Al�cars�er res�.� . � 4 ,� a�e�edit�up fo., f�rrt lb0�t of . sF�t+�� ;� �ioi'f�1e prop�z�tyr�. eO�I�r�;fi� .« `P � � 'r�ideri�ai�r :. ;. , 100°��o�acty�,l�o� es. a� "' '�Iy`�.�b�i�ei toat o€walk construc�ed: '' _, r . . , ,� - The CounCii;of,Eh�C3ty of Paul}�avi�g received t�'�,, " of the Mayor uPon the abovE imp�uem . d having considered sai re,�iprt, hereby resolves: . 1. That the said an the �same is her$by a , roved wft�s. no � a�ternative�,'�tnd that e imated cosf ther�of is see ve forc��d �� rates f�nance�by'a ts .. .. x�. :,,�. ,; .., �.:.��,�t u 2 Tlast.a P4b�C 41 on said�m ;g -/ d`.:4�$ , .�une�r,„,�,�„�,}�� {'a� �,".� '@�itfl,,,,�,�r":t� .�tt7.�;�y' -ftt1��p� ' � �.7,�� j , � . ,� �� I'�.•.T�� 110�1Q4.O�'15�6� .�C �BTi,t1�,��1\►@Ii t0 �,:'� ' d�iS''�liY'��i'�C . ��tnanner.plbvi�ted by C �ifer, st��f�g the time and i�ae o�h��ring, ' t1x x�atu�o�.�e�i�mp v . '�t:and t�e tota�cost the �as,e�i:Yiateii:._ Fi2e No.,5-89-06,9-89-07 . Adopted by the Councii A ril �;2�89. . ,# - . . � Appmved Apr}1 Z8. 1989. .l �4 ; ( ay 6, 19�) '