Loading...
89-931 ��� ��� CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE NO. — � PRELIMINARY ORDER K By File o.' S8924 Votin� In the Matter of sidewalk construction an /or reconstruction�et the following Ward location: . ._ __,, _ _ _. . .. _ 1 58924 Both sides C ar es Avenue from N. Milton St. to N. Chatsw rt St. • — --- _ � RESIDENTIAL rates (SINGLE FAMILY 0 HREE FAMILY) For a 5-foo� wide sidewalk • New on truction (where' no wa3k existed) , $13. 00 per front foot ; rep�.acemen f old sidewaik, ' $6. 50 per front � ft . For a 6-foot wide sidewaik New construc�i n , $ 15 . 60 per I front ft. ; rep�acement of old sid wa k, $7. 80 per fr�nt ft. I All corner residential properties w i3 receive a clredit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconst c ed sidewalk along and abutting the "iong side" of the property. ' COMMERCIAL rates (sil property o h r than resident�,ai) 100Y of ac�ua3 cost estimated to be approximateiy �+4. 00 per square foot of walk constructed. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having rec ived the report of the Mayor up�on the above improvement, and having considered said report,hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby a pro ed with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof isl� *See Above , financed by assess n . � for construction costs and rates. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improveme t o the 6th day of July, 1989 ,at nine �o'clock a.m., in the Council Chambers o the ity Hall and Court House BlUilding in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to e p rsons and in the manner prdvided by the Charter,stating the time and place of hearing,the rrature of the imp ove ent and the total cost therepf as estimated. COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council',Date MAY 2 51� YeasDimond Nays -�_�_-_.�_'� Certified ssed by Cou �il Secretary Long - Rettman � In Favor By • Scheibel /� � - (� Sonnen �/ Against �-2� � Wilson Mayor MAY 2 6 19�i pUBItSHFD J UN - 3198�, !I RE 5/10/89 ��" 9�� DEPARTMENT/OFFlCEICOUNCIL DATE INITIATED � � ^� � Pubt ic works sidewalks 5/3/89 EN $HEET NO. ��A� CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE �pE NT DIRECiOR CRY COUNqL Thomas P. Keefe - 292-6283 �� ❑ nn' N�' CITYCLERK MUBT BE ON COUNqL AOENDA BY(DAT� AOUTINO �BU ET RECTOR FIN.3 MOT.SERVICEB OIR. ust be in City Clerk's Office no �MA OR( RAS818TAN1) Counci 1 Research TOTAL#�OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCAT S R SIGNATUR� ACTION RECUESTED: I I Reconstruct Old Defective and Unsafe Sidewalks n ard t (See attache 1 ist) (File No. S8924) RECOMMENDATIONS:Approw(IU a Relect(i� COUNCIL COMM REPORT OPTIONAL ANALYST HONE NO. _PLANNINO COMMIBSION _CIVIL SERVICE OOMMISSION _d8 COMMITTEE _ A STAFF _ C�MENTB: _DISTRICT OOURT _ SUPPORTS WHICH COUNqL OBJECTIVE7 INITIATINO PROBLEM,18SUE.OPPORTUNITY(1Nho.Whet,Whsn,Where,Why): I The problem "defective sidewalk" was created b ca se of tree roots, leterious subgrade material , alternating freeze/thaw cyc�les, servi ce life limits�, chexnF 1 additives, extreme temperature variations, etc� These problems oc ur on a citywide leve and must be addressed and corrected on an annuaTbasis. Left uncorre te � the sfdew�ralk con ition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable an s b,ject to increased �pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations, ; , �vnHr�oes iF��o: � The community will benefit from this pro,ject ec use it will provid ; safe defect free side- walks for its many citizens. The sidewalk con ra ts are executed by �rivate contractors, so it follows that private sector Jobs are creat d s a result of this �ctivity. . qSADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: ! Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions h ve reated negative f dback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpl s ated� property own s detest assessments, and desplte the fact up to one-half the asse s nt is City subsidi d, it still remains controverslal . i � DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: I This option would allow the infrastructure f idewalk stock to d eriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal .inJury suits� u ti ately resulting in �he expenditure of .�arger dollar amounts in eventual repai�s and/or r pl cement, as well as �laim payouts. � I TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION = 4+3�9��� COS VENUE 9UDOETE E ON� YES NO 8 -M-06 8 A P A 8 � 84 00 A2201 '� r5 � FUNDINO SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FlNANpAI INFORMATION:(IXPLAIN) B� AST ° 3�� �Q� i �. �i B $9 = so,00 ; ���aY 1 i ����9 � r _ �.�/ 58gZ,y P • B.S. CHARLES AVE. from N. Minon St. to N. Chatsworth St. - INITIATING ACTION: This order was iti ted by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) co plaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk i p ured concrete with scaled, settled and cracked panels.