89-348 WHITE - C�TV CLERK �j///'���
PINIC FINANCE ��un(�`ll �//(/+ �f ��
BIp.UERY -MAYORTMENT GITY O AINT PAUL File NO• �� '� ��
Counci esolution
�� �
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
WHEREAS, THE ST PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT REQ ES ED A STUDY OF THEIR CRIME LAB BE
CONDUCTED BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIME LA ORATORY DIRECTORS WHICH WAS COMPLETED IN
DECEMBER OF 1987, AND
WHEREAS, THIS STUDY FOUND THE EXISTING STA F F ONE LIEUTENANT, TWO CRIMINALISTS, TWO LATENT
EXAMINERS, AND ONE CLERK WAS "WOEFULLY INA EQ ATE FOR SERVING A POPULATION THE SIZE OF RAMSEY
COUNTY", AND
WHEREAS, THE STUDY ALSO FOUND THE STAFF AT TH T TIME WAS "WORKING AT FULL CAPACITY" AND THE ST
PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS ADDED SIX ADDIT ON L NARCOTIC OFFICERS TO FIGHT THE WAR ON DRUGS
SINCE THIS STUDY WAS COMPLETED, AND
WHEREAS, THE ST PAUL POLICE DEPART'MENT IS Q ESTING ONE ADDITIONAL CRIMINALIST 1 BE ADDED TO
THE DEPARTMENT BUDGET TO CONTINUE SERVICE T STATUS QUO LEVEL, REDUCE THE BACKLOG CURRENTLY IN
THE LAB AND GAIN MORE CHARGES IN THE AREA F ARCOTIC CASES, AND
WHEREAS,The Mayor, pursuant to Section 10. 7. of the City Charter, does certify that there are
available for appropriation, revenues in e ce s of those estimated in the 1989 Budget; and
WHEREAS, The Ma�or recommends the followin c anges to the 1989 Budget:
CURRENT AMENDED
FINANCING PLAN: BUDGET CHANGE �UDGET
001-GENERAL FUND
9890-UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE 0.00 32,358.00 32,358.00
ALL OTHER FUND FINANCING 123,907,698.00 0.00 123,907,698.00
123,907,698.00 32,358.00 123,940,056.00
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of �
Yeas Nays f�U�,
Dimond
��
�ng In Fav r
Goswitz ,
�'t.
s�ne� Agains' By ��!��i��� ��.j l��"i_���l
Sonnen
Wilson
Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Councii: Date
Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY
By
Approved by Mavor. Date Ap�r d b May�ffor mission to Council
,
By Y `}-�-��i
1'UBtISHFD h��R - 419 9
r.n�n�Rna
WMITE - CITV CLERK
PIN1�� - FINANCE CO�1�ICII X�j
CAFI�ARV -�EPARTMENT G I TY O A I NT PA U L � (J
BLUE - MAVOR File NO. � � �
Counci esolution �
�
Presented By ��_
Referred To Committee: Date
Out of Committee By Date
SPENDING PLAN:
001-GENERAL FUND
04306-CRIME LABORATORY
0111-40160-FULL TIME PERMANENT 357,134.00 26,134.00 383,268.00
GENERAL GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS
FRINGE BENEFITS @ 23.8�
09001-0431-HEALTH & INS CITY SHARE 4,716,188.00 1,415.00 4,717,603.00
09002-0431-HEALTH & INS CITY SHARE 2,631,168.00 558.00 2,631,726.00
09003-0537-OPERATING TRANSFER OUT 200,550.00 95.00 200,645.00
09004-0432-UNEMPLOYMENT COMP 471,301.00 129.00 471,430.00
09013-0411-PERA BASIC PENSION 866,387.00 533.00 866,920.00
09013-0412-PERA COORDINATED PENSION 2,228,843.00 977.00 2,229,820.00
09013-0413-SOCIAL SECURITY 4,108,026.00 1,717.00 4,109,743.00
09013-0419-HRA PENSION 135,104.00 64.00 135,168.00
09020-0448-MISC EXPENSES 695,948.00 736.00 696,684.00
ALL OTHER ACTIVITY SPENDING 476,680.00 0.00 476,680.00
ALL OTHER FUND SPENDING 107,020,369.00 0.00 107,020,369.00
123,907,698.00 32,358.00 123,940,056.00
NET CHANGE � 32,358.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, th t he City Council adopts these changes to the 1989
Budget.
. �r)
� , !yl',Q,P.ti �,� - �e
i �
COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of:�
Yeas Nays L��
Dimond
�� In Favor
Goswitz /
scnee� � Against By �C.��i���- G�� ����c.G> _.
Sonne�—
Wilson
FEB 2 � 1��� Form App ov d by City Attor y
Adopted by Council: Date �
Certified P-s ed b Coy{�S ta BY
By �
�
Approved b 'Vlavor D
- � Approv d Mayo or ubmiss' n to Council
By � � Y
B
p�g��p MAR - � 19 9
nn�nionn
. :
• w'► � � y , � �I . � . . . .. . -- .... ..
° � INTRODUCTION
� On December 2, 1987 at the request of the St. Paul Police
Department, a study of he crime lab was conducted. The study
was done through the erican Society of Crime Laboratory
Directors . Two Laborat ry Directors, Martha Gray of the Pinellas
County Forensic Labora or and Captain Enrico N. Togneri of the
Washoe County Sheriff 's Of ice, were assigned to the study.
The Saint Paul Police De a tment Laboratory serves all of the law
en�.�rcement agencies i Ramsey County. Ramsey County has a
population of approxim t ly 830, 000 and a law enforcement
communi�y of approximat ' 1 1200 officers . The laboratory has a
staff cons,�sting of a irector, two criminalists, two latent
examiners and a clerical pe son.
The study team spent t o nd one half days on site .' The team
• interviewed the laborato y taff, clients within the depaztment
and clients from outsid he department, including the District
Attorney's Office . The ea also reviewed the laboratory files,
the examination procedures nd the evidence handlin
g procedures .
�VE A L OBSERVATIOIVS
The team was surpri�ed y the limited services provided by the
laboratory to its clie ts, and the lack of utilization of
physical evidence by the investigators . There appears to be an
overall lack of eviden e, with the exception of controlled
substances, submitted to an forensic�laboratory, especially the
Police Department Laborat ry. The Department has to address
whether this level of f re �ic services 'is � adequate to fulfill
its mission.
One area of concern was t e uality of the evidence received by
the laboratory. During the nterviews it became evident that the
importance placed on evide c gathering has shifted in recent
years . The collection o hysical evidence is not as effective
now as it was at one tim . It appears that no importance is
given to evidence colle tion. The investigators seem to be
caught in a cycle : the la oratory cannot process evidence other
than latent prints, con rolled substances, firearms and blood
alcohol; timely services a 'e ot available for other types of
physical evidence; eviden e ollected is not analyzed; therefore
.� less and less evidence is o1 ected . We noted a definite lack of
certain types of evidence, su h as toolmarks
, glass, fibers, etc.
age 1
�`
---.—_ _. _ ---
~ ♦�1.•� ../1 t . - . . , . . ' __ .
I ""
During the interviews with he clients it became obvious that not
.-.much was expected from t e aboratory. This is not to be taken
as a derogatory assess e t, but rather, an awareness of the
limitations of services com ined with a lack of understanding
that the laboratory is in fact unable rather than unwillinq to
provide the needed for n ic services . We found that :the
laboratory does not se v as an investigatory tool, with the
exception of processing ajor crime scenes and fingerprints
comparison. We found al s a total lack of utilization of trace '
ev�'rc?ence and serology in n oing investigations .
TKe �team found it difficult to accept the fact that a major
metropolitan area utiliz s such a limited forensic resource in
its invest-igation of crim s The clients, including the County
Attorney, e:tpressed fru t ation regarding the lack of forensic
services . The team fel that the laboratory staff and the
laboratory clients were ware of this deficiency reqarding
forensic evidence, and we e hoping for a change . The county
attorney and the investig t rs we interviewed were very receptive
to utilizing some of the orensic capabilities that would be
available from a full ser i e laboratory.
The area of serological e idence seemed to be the area with the
most potential for proble s . With the new advances in forensic
serology, it has becom imperative in many courts, that the
evidence be processed as o n as pOJJible . Potential exculpatory
evidence can be destroye ' f not properly processed, leaving the
door open for evidence u pression. At the present time very
little serological eviden e is being p�ocessed by the laboratory.
There is also the issue of what is on the horizon in serology.
In the near future DNA a alysis will be a reality in police
laboratories . DNA will p o ide the potential for identifying and
excluding suspects from s minal stains, blood stains and hair . It
will become essential to a e these services available .
The possibility of identi ying serial crimes is reduced if you do
not have trace �r serolog c pabilities . The investigators can
be assisted by physica vidence- from the inception of the
investigation. It can b invaluable in preparing search
warrants, eliminating su pe ts and for overall evaluation of th�
case . A close working r la ionship between the laboratory and
the investigators i� ess ntial in many investigations . We did �
not see such a relation hi in this department; however the
� laboratory personnel is s severely limited in the assistance
that it can provide to th i vestigators, it appears that such a
relationship in this dep rt ent is virtually impossible . There
are �ome definite differ nc s between the expectations and the
reality as they are view �d y both the investigators and the lab
personnel . We will ad xe s some possible solutions in the
closing statements of thi r port . -
Pa9e 2
_
. ,.-•• , -..
� � r�czr,rTY
� The laboratory is on t z second floor of the Police Department :
The space was recently z m deled ��nd it appears to suit the need
of the laboratory's p e ent function. There appears to be
adequate space to perfor he types of examinations now being
offered, however addi i nal space will be needed if the
laboratory expands its c pabilities . The space requirements will
be dictated by the types o analyses the laboratory should expand -
into. The team felt tha ' the laboratory needed a secure evidence
vat�--�, At the present i e evidence is held in a room where any
lai; uisitor has access . As far as safety, the areas that could
pos.e �problems were the nfrequency of fire extinguishers and the
lack of an..-exit from the in�trument room in case of a fire in the
main laboratory. The . ana also no�ed drinking of c��offee and
smoking in the labora or ; this is� not a good practice
considering the possible �fi e and biologica'1 hazarc�s . ,`; �
. �,� c1/r�����;�7
P�P.SONNEL �S �`� '�f�'�L O.
The staff consists o a Lieutenant (Lab Directer ) , tWo
criminalists, two latent ex miners and a clerk . This is; woetully
inadequate for serving opulation the size of Ramsey County.
The only reason they are maintaining a decent turn around time is
due to the lirnited � rvices ( types ) and the overall lack of
evidencc gathering by t;i l� w enforcement agencies . Thie presen�,
staff i� �r�orking at �ul capacity.� 'ae would racommend an
immediate incr^;a:;�: in :;t ffzng i � .;iore substantial services are
!:o be pzovided . I� ' s ur opinion th�� � catch 22 situation has
developed . The lack f personnel, results in very limited
services which in turn r su ts in under utiYization by detectives
and ultimately results i i effective crime scene processing. A
Lull cycle of .lUL util ' zi g i�hysical evidence in investigation
and prosecution is there or established .
The director of the labo at ry appears �o be very interested in
improving the services f the laboratory. While he does not
have a scientific �ackgr un , he has taken the initiative . to
become aware of � labor to y �perations . His involvement in
laboratory management gr up such as `�� ASCLD will assist him in
dealing with laboxatory 'ss es . It is important that he continue
to stay active in these yp s of organizations .
., , .. . .. ; . , . . .. .. , : : . .
' The labora�ory i� basic- 11 ;� c?rug, blocd alcohol, firearms,
arson .�nd identificat ' on laboratory; it provides no other
�ervices to its clienL-s . T e main areas of criminali�tics such
as serology, hairs, fib rs �aint, etc . , are not analyzed and we
find it dangerous �o h ve only one person capable of doing
firearm� comparisons . 0 e of the essecitial requirement� of a
forensic examination is he ability to have peer review, this is
�-�npo:�sibl� If only ��ne �e am ner i.s av.�il�ble . '
page 3
- , � A- : . . � �9����'
.
The technical personne f the laboratory is divided into two
groups, the criminalist a d the identification section. This
...separation �ppears to be tr e of cooperation as well as function.
The team felt as if the e were two different camps within the
laboratory. There ap ea s to be some well seeded animosity
between the two groups . Th's must be rectified if a true team
approach is to be achiev d y the laboratory.
The criminalists appea o have a good understanding of their
profession and their par ic lar limitations . They both appeared
ve��� knowledgeable and i terested in doin a
� g good job. In
re�,�ewing their case fil s e noted well prepared reports and
fa�rly complete note pa ke s . The overall quality of the work
product seemed very good e basically reviewed drug cases since
that is the� vast majorit o the caseload .
During discussions with th criminalists it became evident that
they are aware of their 1 mitations in the ability to offer
expanded services . T ey realize that they do not have the
required training to per or additional services, and that they
would not be able to p rform other types of examinations in
addition to their pre en caseload . Additional trained
personnel, equipment and po sibly facilities would be required in
order to increase the ca ab lities of the laboratory. The team
also sensed frustration fr m the criminalists reali�ation that,
although they are perfor in to the best of their abilities, they
ar� not, by any means, p ov ding complete services .
The latent print examin rs are also very professional and well
trained . The quality f heir work'product seemed very good .
The latent print examin zs should be much moxe involved with the
,!� training of of.ficers in ri e scene processing. Howeve� a staff ::
' U�''` increase is essential i � traininq � e£fort is to be initiated.
IJ The training should be ad available to detectives as well as
�rv�'"� patrol officers . Throu h ducation, the utilization of physic�l
evidence will be drastic 11 enhanced .
As in the case of the ri inalists, the latent print examiners
are aware that their mai 1 mitations are manpower and equipment .
Again, we felt frustration in the . inability to provide more
services . �
The clerical services s ou d be automated by using computerized •
; case tracking and reportinq All of the reportJ Jhould be typed,
this will give a much or professional appearance to the final
�roduct . Thi� added burd n on the one clerical person will have
to be compensated by additi nal staff .
paqe 4
�
. c�OUIPiZEP1T
The criminalists h�ave de uate equipment to perform their present
analysis . The only «d itional equipment that - �oulc� '�e useful
:�ould be a bu?le� ec very tank . We were sur
criminalist could eff ct 'vely test firearms with��only ahcotton
box. The cost of .� =.aater recovery tank would be less than
SS, GOO . OQ ,
The latent L.,rint e�tami er should have some additional equipment .
'�`:ey should explore la er technology for processing. The cost of
_�i:ch equipment would b a proximately $10, 0000 . 00 for a portable
`4ai"t and $20, 000 . 00 fo a fixed unit . Also, the automated
retrieval _system should b maintained and updated .
'=he space allocated to h� latent �ect.ion is somewhat limited Lor
�he amount and �ize of .v'd��nce that can be submitted -�o �hem for
. processing.
l7t T:I,I'nY �';^LJR?�CJCi;
The overall c�uality o� he �aork �ertormed in the 1:3bor.3tory :;eems
very good . However, he e �re �ome 3reas �.inic:� could improve .
• �i1� �Le�7 1:: �iiC..' :�C'I�Ort �5 li� 1 �`. :�t10111<� �, -- -
readabiiity •�r�d overall .,P ear�►lcc . 'ihi:, wi ! � ��,,�~�� `°r =�'ttcr
clerical ;:;.1�. ,uire a�iditional
The sketche� t;:,:,z �.vr r�� i�= c�u a� �rt ,_ -,,,,
were nut ;,s c r ±-� - " �, '` ." _ � .:ne ;cene �,r�.r_c,col
o.n�le � ::s th y .;hould h�:�ie ._�eenf.
The laborator• ;;, � � - �
1 `�ouy�. � rt;c��a�a ,r. <=, � �roficienc� ting
nrogr3Ti'i. Ti: :.S OLli I:ilf'r•� t��i7Gli"i� `- •- +- � • . / j tes
- � �_ha� _he _.��o���t,ry � irector
;zas enrolled in �,uch a p o ram. .
There s�lOL1�.Ca '�C �lOCUliI??1 t?� ��;� �r !ir'.J qi ?;l< <Jnrr:
`- -°` ' 1 prcduct .
laboratory director c;ces . The
�eview C3SeS� however, ne lacks the
expertise t�r ,.� ��il� ±��,+� ,nicai reviFw.
T"e 1.aborat.ory doe� not 'r.e�p a complete chain of cu�tod
It is mandatory Lhat h� �vidence be marked b Y record .
receiving it, and be 1� el d _�,s it is bein rocessed , th�Aperson
g p ` found
�everal items o� �>videnc hat were not marhed, theretore they
could not be identi �i d i� �hey •,�ere :=eparateci from thcir
i�ackaging . t�S �Jt? :;t.a�'_':�' -_�Z �.i.t��� `:["lt� f'V1l"1PnC(' �t1C�1_1��� ::.P �:E`�t: �.i1
•� limited access �z.c�a �;� t,�; 1� *�;-;� iaborator• m
::�:t�urnir�: ��r ,-�����r� , , , �'� he per�on
3 t tltlq �:.ill :l�liir�I1CC :�Elt)I.11cj _e1::0 �I1:31�rr? £lill
<<�;cu:lentation of rcl�<.i�e �in acceptance . This documentation will
rAflect ?ach p�r�on °.rt10 I�:� dl���� th�� ��vidence and �riill :�how �he
complete chain of cu:;tod� of the evidence during the time it is
in the laboratory.
. p;ag� �
• `
. �
. . .. �9 - � ��
The labo�ratory must p omote additional participation in
professional organizatio s . It is c�ucial for both the technical
'�staff and the management st ff to attend professional seminars .
RE OMMENDATIOidS
The team found a laborat ry that is functioning in a very limited
capacity. This in its lf would not be a problem if other
forensic facilities wer a ailable and able to fill the gap. It
became apparent in our i te views that this is not the case . The
st:�::� laboratory is ot responsive to the needs of the
iriv�stigators or the cou ',ty attorney. Their problem appears to
be �staffing, however th eam did not do an assessment of that
facility. _In light of he e circumstances, Saint Paul Police
Department has the choi e of utilizing the State Laboratory for
their investigative fore si needs, or expandinq their present
laboratory to meet thes eeds . If expansion of their present
laboratory is the ch ic , the team has the following
recommendations :
1- Determine the c pa ilities that are needed most . It
appears that ser lo y and trace analysis .�re the
primary needs o 1 w entorcement agencies served by the
St . Paul laborat ry The equipment costs for serological
exams �re, at t� e resent time not �ubstantial ( under
$30, 000 . 00 ) . Tt1 e uipment need� �or a trace section
could he JLIL�Jtan ia ( in e fce�;s �>� a�00, Q00 . 00 ) .
2- Obtain ,�dequate pa e and ;iire �.'.he necessary trained
persotlnel . Two er �C��IJI�J arlu �:�o �race analysts would
be needed; the r as n for two analy�ts in each discipline
relates to the n ed of peer r2vi�w. The population base
- would support su h n inczease in :taff . If the services '
wer� offered the wo k�oad woulc: be generated . There also
needs to be addi io al pezsonnel allocated for the latent
print section an � e clerical secti.on .
3- Purchase the udd ' i;i nal equipment .
4- Develop trainin p ograms ir�� the utilization of fc�rensic
evidence . This ou d be provided for the clients . There
needs to be an ' nc ease in awareness of the potential
value of phycica e idencc . A� we stated earlier thi� �
� training cannct be ��rovided by the exi�ting latent print
and criminali:�ti s -taf� �r�ithout further impacting their
already limited es tzrces , You �hould also expect an
increa�e in r.use oa :�ubtiequent �o any training sessions .
This phenomenon i as been ?::perie��ced by a niimber of
agencies .
page 6
. . ,
. . . . -
5- Ii�crease th� tr in 'ng of �t � '
�.1�_ �xaminers by encouraging
partici�ation i n tional as well as regional
associations su h as the :�merican �lcademy of Forensic
Sciences, The I te nation<-�1 A�sociation of
Iclentification, th American Society of Crime Labor�tory
Directo-s, etc. P rticipation in these organizations
will keep your � ge cy current �:�ith sta�t� of the ,3rt
techniques . Th i formation exchanges at these meetings
_ is crucial to a fu ensic �aboratory. �
� - _ 6- Establish prot co s for the interaction between
_ investigators a d aboratury statf . One way to achieve
this i� to have m etings regardinq the evidence
su.bsequent to a ma or case . Th '_� couid �lso incluc�e
training sessions involvinq t::e lab �taLf �nd cther
Divisions in the d part�ent
7- Re-Qstabli:�h cAine �cene i;1ve:;ciza;.ion unit.; . , �
" �1� �ime
trained scene in esti��ators would qreatlr in�nrov�� �;�e
gua.lity and quan i y or: `;�e evici�nce collcc�ed .
`i,_i<.�;, ;
;. - - ��"�7"4
.-_-�„- . , 111° 0 1675 �
Police nEpe�tT��r - - - — -
" t�c i tC e CONTACT
" � PHONE <`�
� - DATE , �
ASSIGp NUKBBR FOR ROtTTING ORDER: (See r e se side.)
� Department Director Mayor (or Assistant)
Finance and Mana ement Services Dire to City Clerk .
u�t-Hirector � _
Gity Attorney , � _
TOTAL NUlIBBR OF SIGNATURB PAGES: 1 ( li all locations for signature.)
i�1 4 (PurposefRationale)
t .
The St. Paul Police Department will hir o e Criminalist I for the St. Paul
Police Crime Lab.
�
i
CD II G Y AN S
See attached Council Resolution and Cri e ab Study.
N G C GE C T :
(Mayor's signature not required if unde' $ 0,000.)
Total Amount of Trsnsgction: � 4�� Activity Number: 04306
Funding Source: General Fund — o� �'� r�uC��:,�_
ATTACHMENT3: (List and number all att hm nts.) Go�n�ii Re�earch Cenfier
l . Council Resolutlon
2. Crime �.ab Study �EB 13 i�89
ADI�IINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
_ � Yes _No Rules, Regulations, oc dures, or Budget Amendment required?
x ye$ _No If yes, are they or me able attached? I
N W CITY _ V h
DEPARTME T REVIE ,
� ' �
?EYes �No Council resolution req r ? Resolution required? _ _,Yes , �No i
_Yes X No Insurance required? Insurance sufficient? _Yes _No �
Yes _No Insurance attachedT
— , �
'
i