The URL can be used to link to this page

89-212 �, `` ,,� W�Ly,,� 9-�-�,,�-��--,�Q.�.� _ � c�� - � L'/_ gg � � _ �� WHITE - C�TV CIERK PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PALTL Council �J CANARV - DEPAi7TMENT �\ BLUE - MAVOR File NO. �- �/- ` City .Attny/JTH • • �.�. C uncil R ution� , �� ,�� Presented By �eferred To ?-°�' �" �'> ��' Committee: Date � '�� \ Out of Committ� By Date ,t R SOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL SEC I�D CYCLE URBAN P.EVITALIZATIOV ACTION PROGRAM WHEREAS , he Cduncil of the City of Saint Paul did approve on September 23 , 937 , l�� ?:esolution �7-1395 , guidelines for imnlemen- tation of the ity of �Saint Paul Urban Revitalization Action Pro�ram (URAP) and ��:� WHEREAS , he Saint Paul Capital Im rovement Bud et Committee, the Saint Paul Planning Co�` ission, a ected neig borhood District Councils , nei� borhood non-p�ro it or�;anizations and city staff have participated i a review proc@ss of U�.L�P proposal subr_missions in accordance wit the adopted U�P guidelines ; and '�, .` WHEREAS , he Council has re�eived and considered the recommen- dations of the Mayor and advice o�, the Capital Improvement Budget Committee for ctivities and fundi�` amounts as set out in the attached URAP Financing Summary; now, therefc��e be it s. RESOLVED, that with the advice oi� the Capital Improvement Budget Committee, the Council of the City of S�aint Faul hereby recommends the following ctivities and financing f�r inclusion in the Second Cycle Saint Pa 1 Urban Revitalization Act"on Program: Project Title Budget International arketplace �, $ 1 ,067 , 500 .00 North End Part ership II '� 780, 000.00 Concentrated E st Side Renewal `w 1 ,022 ,500 .00 Lower Bluff Re italization � 1 ,000 ,000 .00 Total $ �,3 ,870,000 .00 r COUNCIL MEMBERS '�' Yeas Nays Requested by Department of:�, Dimond �ng In Favor Goswitz Rettman B Sc6eibel A gai n s t Y Sonnen Wilson Form Approved b City Attorney � Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secr tary BY `� gy, Approved by i�lavor: Date _ Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council gy By . - . _ . . . . _. ts� . WHITE — CiTV C'LERK 1 ""'�� _� PINK — FINANCE // /- CANARY — DEPARTMENT CITY OF SAINT PAUL F1eci1N0. '�' ^�� BLUE —MAVOR Council ution Presented By �� ` ---'� - _ , : _ - ,_� � Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date ,.2.. a�d b� it � �, t�t Geo�rsa Lati�, ss t�fdaf �i� �(lfficsr of t�s Ci� of �� ia l�tb� a�riz+�d arae� dira�ct�d ib snb�3.t tl� �a�l � �a�vital�atte�a Actio� Psro►gr�e far r�ti�r aa�d t ta t� ap�r�opriat� Stita of Min�e�r�►ta liE�9: . a�d be it . �' �, #�iat �e Ms�►+or or his dasi�atsd s�eprssa�tativaa, t�s biz+�ctro!t I'l.ia4ia� aad �'�oo�osic Urvalapoe�et is fitrt3�r �t�orf.s�d � ta snb�it to 3tat� of` l�ttmo�is� �r ass�iac�s, cs�tificaeia� ts�aic�ai � e�r ad�i"�iaas�l i�s�sti� t�sst s�► b� s�equlacad by � t�e S�at+� tl�air r`�a�l.�r of the �sia� F�u1. � �s�►italisatf.oa � lr+�aet aod b� it . _ . ,: . FZi�1�'� VBD, th�tt np� �tifi�tioa af spps�o�val ot tl�s S�daat Pan). B�anri�slisativet Actio� Pro�, tLr Coodail dd�s �► ths ps�ops�c Cit�r of�'�i�la to � tbs graat agru��t a�c! b+e� tha S�atti+i �f 3��ta a�d thn 4#.t�r a� �ti� an3. �a�t t� IIr'b�m ]�rit�l.i:stti�a��e�t� Pz�Sram. .� i � , , �� COUNCIL MEMBERS Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays Dimond �� [n Favor Gosw;tz - Rettman ��j�� Against BY Sonnen Wilson Form Approved by City Attorney _.__ Adopted by Council: Date _ � , :� t' .. ..,.�' , Certified Yassed by Council Secr ary BY '�'�:� f ' °:'`�'``� By Alpproved by lVlavor. Date Approved�by Mayor Eor Submission to��ouncil By ` BY � . � . . . � �,-�q _a��. URBAN REVITALIZATION ACTION PROGRAM FINANCING S[1I�IARY 2nd Round Financing Sources: Community Developme t Block Grant Year XV (1989) : $ 1,935,000 198 Sicate of Minnesota URAP Fund: $ 1 ,935,000 Total Financing Available: $ 3,870,000 ' �� Funding CIB Co�ittee Mayor Log # Project (in rank order) Rating Requested Reco�ended Reco�ended U-0721 International Marketplace 86.90 $ 1 ,067,500 $ 1,067,500 $ 1 ,067,500 U-0621 North Ehd Partnership II 85.60 780,000 780,000 780,000 U-0521 Concent�-ated E. Side Ren. 85.40 2,062,500 1 ,022,500 2,022,500 U-0421 Lower B uff Revitalization $2.U0 1,625,000 1,000,000 0 U--0821 Selby A e. Revitalization 76.00 1,706,500 0 0 U-0321 West Side Gateways 69•20 1,725,000 0 0 U-0921 All Roads/West Seventh 64. 13 1,28�,500 0 0 U--0322 W. Side Health Center 59.60 260,000 0 0 Total Financing Requested: $ 10,511 ,800 Total Financipg Recommended: $ 3,870,000 # 3,870,000 �� - . C��O7�°Z �s�i*= o. � GITY OF SAINT PAUL ` "P '� � OFFICE OF THE MAYOR ♦ � 4 O ' .1 , 1��'��'�� 1 �� Q 347 CITY HALL .... i SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 GEORGE LATIMEK (612) 298-4323 MAYOR January 24, 1 89 Council Presi ent James Scheibel and Members of t,he City Council Dear Council f�resident Scheibel and Members: , RE: Second C�cle Urban Revitalization Action Program (URAP) Attached for }�our review and consideration please find a proposed Council Resolution wh�ch transmits my financing recommendations for the second cycle of the URAP P�hogram. The recommendations are the result of a discussion w�tn staff as well I as my q@CSOnaI ro=�;�..• �° ��_ . financing thi� roun In a letter t the ,�~ FEBRUARY� 1989 support of th CIB believe the r tings Nays While I suppo t the yeas package somew at dii �pgWITZ The purpose a d stal `��G neighborhood evita] of success en isione `��Z„r� in order to inance undercut the intent that the available r � rated propos ls. .`4 ,�IL� There was co siderab �IMONI3�"-� process cone rning t ~ understand i , the r fund proposa s as co� . PRESIDENT� SCHEIBEL agreed with he Coun� continue to ollow tl I am hopefuljthat thr receive Stat� assist� _ __ ____r _...,u� � future finan ing suppvrL witl be to demonstrate our shared commitment to the purpose and oals of the program. This includes the financing and successful implementati n of quality, comprehensive revitalization projects. , ,. ;'��!_� , � � . }.� �" - Very truly y�urs, ��„�tl -� � ,r�' � ' i y � ��J . . '.\ �'� ��,��'",� -;; �cG`� _�\ l :,:.,.�.1.�;,� > � � `—: p�2� � - C� f .F �� ,E��!'� G � l;iv`�' ��<� � ' - Georg Lati er `� � 'L �o .�, �� Mayo I ZQ`p� �3 ,..,'D COUNCIl.MAN � � - �, _ � JAhl�ES SCHEISEL' I-'_._j . `� � r� � Attachment � S.e�u46 I I , , . _ � .._ . . .. . 1 ` �. . j � � �� I� � � � � �t*• o`;�, � CITY OF SAINT PAUL :`�~ '�'� LONG-RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE s� �� iii�t;iiiii c; . „G , OFFICE OF THE MAYOR — BUDGET SECTION '�•• c 367 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 GEORGE LATIMER 612-298-4323 MAYOR January 17 1989 � T0: The Holorable George Latimer Member� of the City Council UR�AN REVITALIZATION ACTIOlI PROGRaM: SECOND FUIIDIlIG CYCLE gEPOi�T OF THE LONG Rl1NGE CAPI?AL IMPEOVEMEMT BUDGET C014�I?TEE The Saint �aul Long Range Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) Committee transmits„ via this letter and accompanying documentation� its comments, recommenda ions and priorities for the second cycle of the Urban Revitaliza ion Action Program (URAP) . The succes and quality of Saint Paul's Capital Budgeting Process and the URAP p ogram is dependent upon, and the direet res.ult of, many hours of dedicat d service and cooperation. As members of the CIB Committee, we wish to thank the Planning Commission for their conscientious review of the sec nd cycle proposals. We also thank the District Councils, neighborho d organizations and city staff who have made major contributl ns in tne URAP process. Input from all these groups and organizati ns has given' us a sound basis for our recommendatiQns, The strength o the CIB process continues to be a direct result of all groups and organizations working together in a non—partisan manner to improve th quality of life in Saint Paul. Finalizing�the proposal recommendations contained in this report proved to be an a duous task in this second financing cycle. All proposals appeared t� be comprehensive in nature, resulting in an across--the--board increase i� the quality of the proposals submitted. All submitting groups andjorganizations are to be congratulated for their conscientious work. j Unfortunat ly, the demand for resources once again exceeds the amount of requests. It is therefore not possible to address all of the demonstrat d needs in this second cycle of the URAP program. The recommenda ions have, however, been developed thoughtfully, and with the recognitio of sometimes competing needs and limited resources. PROJECT RECOMNENDATIONS U--0721 IN RNATIONAL NARKE'�'PLACE: The CIB Committee recommends that this proposal be financed at the requested amount of $1 ,067,500. The proposal e compasses the spirit and intent of the URAP program, and will revitalize a concentrated four block area of University Avenue between Mackubin a d Western. The proposal was submitted by University United, an umbrell group created by nine organizations concerned with the revitaliza ion of University Avenue. Activities to be undertaken include th�e redevelopment of vacant commercial space, the removal of ; i .R.,�.� . � , - , � I r�ayor George �.atimer and Members of the City Council Page Two I January 17, 1g89 I blighted stru tures and re—use of the land� necessary public improvements,�and commercial revitalization. The results will include the creation f an International shopping mall which reflects the character and�influence of the neighborhood residents. the elimination of blighted a�nd vacant property, and the revitalization of a section of one of the ci�ty's oldest commercial strips. I U--0621 1108TH EIID PARTNEgSHIP PHASE II: The Committee recommends this proposal as 'ts second priority, with a financing recommendation of $780,000. T e proposal will complete the acquisition of severely blighted stru�ctures in the Sycamore/Park/Lyton/ Sylvan area, provide for the relocati n of the residents, removal and/or relocation of the structures, nd assemblage of land for new housing development. When combined wit the Phase I housing and commercial activity, this proposal will both co tinue and enhance the needed improvements in the Rice Street area.i U-0521 COIiCE�iTBATED EAST SIDE RENEiiAL: The East Side proposal admirably encompasses �the intent of the URAP program. The commercial component ineludes the re—use of a vacant former Whirpool building and substantive commercial evitalization along both lower Payne and lower Arcade Avenues. T e housing component includes the conversion of rental to homeownersh'p housing through acquisition/rehabilitation/resale, and the provision o home improvement-gr�rt�.- -�The-ariticipated accomplishments include the establishment of new businesses and accompanying jobs on the canmercial trips� public improvements, and revitalized neighborhood housing. I The Committ�e recommends that this proposal be financed at $1 ,022,500. This figure is approximately half of the requested $2�062,500.. Due to the size of the proposal and the extent of the activities to be undertaken, the Committee did not believe that this proposal could be accomplishe in the required two year time frame. Combined with the limited amo nt of URAP resources, this financing recommendation will nevertheles�s allow for the implementation of a substantial portion of the proposdd aetivities. I U--0421 Lo�er Bluff Revitalization: Phase II: The Committee is recommendir�g financing for this proposal at a level of $1 ,000,000, or $625,000 1 'ss than the requested $1 ,625,000. . The proposal was ranked fourth by he Committee, and is designed to create a new Third Street Gateway in o the Dayton's Bluff neighborhood. Activities will include: housing an vacant land acquisition; land assemblage for new housing constructi n; rental to homeownership conversion; and commercial rehabilita ion activities. I While less tnan the total amount requested, we believe that the financing ecommendation will allow for a substantial improvement to the Third Stre t gateway into Dayton's Bluff. I , _ _ . . . .. _ .�.�.� I II I I Mayor Geor�e Latimer and Members of the City Council Page Three January 17} 1989 i i i PROGRAM RECOlQlENDA?IONS I U-0322 ?H CENTER EZPANSIOl1: The Committee does not believe this proposal m ets the primary goals of the URAP program. While the Committee trongly recognizes and appreciates the need of the West Side Community ealth Center, we do not believe the URAP program is an appropriate funding source, and recommend that alternative public/priv te financing be pursued. I FUTUgE UHAP� CYCLES: The Committee realizes that this financing cycle represents �;ne use of all currently available State and City URAP funds. We further nderstand the City, together with the cities of Minneapolis and Duluth, are actively pursuing additional URAP financing as part of Governor Pe pich's proposed Year of the Cities initiative. I The CIB Co ittee strongly supports the City's efforts in securing future URAP financing. In the event the Minnesota Legislature allocates additional esources to the URAP program, the CIB Committee recommends the followi g: � Lengtl� of Proposals: Members of the Committee found in some cases that �t was extremely difficult to read and evaluate proposals of up toj150 pages in length. In order that prvposals be of a manag able length in the future, we recommend that: 1) a page limit be imposed; 2) the proposals not include in the body of the docume t plans, marketing studies or similar documents. We believ summaries of these items will be sufficient to conduct evalua ions. 3) We further recommend if pictures are to be used, � they b distributed during proposal presentations rather than includ'ng them in the document. Most often tne quality of xerox copies of pictures is of little value. � Cooper�tion: In both URAP rounds, it appeared that some proposals were d�veloped independently, or with very little input from other groups�� and organizations within the proposal area. The Committee wishe5 �to underscore the fact that the URAP guidelines stress the n�ed ar'd value of cooperation between all affected groups and organi�ations. I i I , II , , _ . i Mayor George Latimer and Members of the City Council Page Four i January 17, 1989 , � Propos�al Presentations: In this second cycle of the URAP program, a bus our was added to assist the Committee in its evaluation of the pr posals. The Committee believes that while the bus tour proved to be a great improvement, an additional session with the propos 1 submittors is necessary. We tnerefore recommend that in future URAP funding cycles, an additional question and answer sessiu be schEduled with all proposal submittors prior to propos l rating. This additional step will allow Committee member and submittors to clear up any misunderstandings that may be pre ent, and have a better understanding of each proposal. �� --� . � c �,,,,,;L�� Th as Gmein er, Vice airman CIB Committe Members Toni Baker David G. McDonell Merrill Robinson Ine2 Bonk Wendie Miller Lauri Rockne Virginia Car oll Tina Moreland Laurie Simon Rebecca Cass dy Arthur Gaard Maxine Smi'th Kathryne Ha gerty Miehael Peroz Jon Walsh Judith Kinke d Lloyd Peterson cc: � '� . 'il ' � v� i o 0 0 0 0 0 � o � � . I i0 1 Q1 �O � � O N r/ �O �1 1 . . . . . . . . . � I aD C� a0 CD t� � � �1 I 1 111 �, I • •� N O� C► eV l� N 1 O O� t� t� �C �O 1[1 �O 1 C► I 1 tn 'I 1 • C� .� e'�1 O a O .� ( d' W O� GD f� �O �O �O I 1 CO I �l1 � • � l� O �l' N O N I i � CO t� t� � �D l� t� I I �l1 I 1 • 1 �O Q1 CO � CO l� �O 1n I 1 CO 'I 1 u1 I • t� .� �O cV d CD O I O CO CO CO Ca �O 1n In 1 C� 1 1n � 1 • [� 01 d' �O N O eh 1 O Ca CD oD !� t� � �C II i O� I 1 t1'1 i • O O d' O d' d� .� I 1 CO O► O► CO oD �D �D �O � 1 00 C 1 � -.i 1 . ch �i �O O r� N I� �I a ' � CD 01 OD CD CO t� �p I 1 � . ... .� 1 • .-1 1n t0 O C1 �D O � i ao o� n co 0o in �r �r m � o0 O fL I 1n I' a i � � m a'�o n � � � � I � � I� i • o �n �o �r o � o � I, i a�o a� o► ao � �o �o a� O a � i �: �o � c� �r ao c� o z � � o o� a+ rn ca �c � �o � rn I E+ a I, i � � ao � �n � o 0 � � I � � � � � �o a� �o ao b 0 o I i � �n o eh c� o co � N a i t r� r � oo r t� �o � � � �I 1 � N (� 1 1n � � � � ; � � URBAN REVI?ALIZA?I011 AC?IO11 PROGRAM FIliANCIIIG SU[4�IASY 2nd Round Fina cing Sources: Community Deve�opment Block Grant Year XV ( 1989): $ 1,935,000 � 1988 State of Minnesota URAP Fund: $ 1.935,000 I __...�_.._._____.. Total Financing Available: � 3,870,000 I ��afffs Funding CIB Co�ittee Log # Pr{oject (in rank order) 8ating Requested Reco�ended U-0721 Ir�ternational Marketplace 86.90 $ 1 ,067,500 $ 1 ,067,500 i U-0621 Nc�rth End Partnership II 85.60 780.000 780,000 I U-0521 Cdncentrated E. Side Ren. $5.40 2,062,500 1,022,500 I U--0421 L,�wer Hluff Revitalization 82.40 1,625,000 1 ,000,000 I U--0821 S�lby Ave. Revitalization 76.00 1 ,706,500 0 I U-0321 W�st Side Gateways 69.20 1,725,000 0 U-0921 A�1 Roads/West Seventh 64. 13 1 ,284,500 0 I U-0322 WI. Side Health Center 59.60 260,000 0 i Total Financing Requested: $ 10,511 ,800 ��^ � Total F�inancing Reco�ended: ; 3,870,000 � ��f��f i _ I I � I � � � I � i � � � � . . ��*••. CITY OF SAINT P�UL ^ :� �'i OFFICE OF THE MAYOR • - , : _�� ; � •� �� i 3�7 CI?Y HALL RECEIVED �... SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA S5f02 GEORGE LATIMER I (612) 298-�323 �qN 271989 MAYOR I January 2u, 1989 CITY CLERK Council President James Scheibel and Members ofithe City Council Dear Councillpresident Scheibel and Members: RE: Second lycle Urban Revitalization Action Program (URAP) � Attached for �your review and consideration please find a proposed Council Resolution w ich transmits my financing recommendations for the second cycle of the URAP rogram. The recommendations are the result of a discussion with staff as wel as my personal review of the eight proposals submitted for financing th�s round. In a letter �o the Council on January 13, 1989, I indicated my agreement and support of t e CIB Committee's URAP process and their proposal ratings. I believe the atings are sound , and based upon a careful and thorough review. While I supp rt the CIB rating recommendations, I am recommending a financing package some hat different from the Committee. The purpose nd stated goal of the URAP program is to provide comprehensive � neighborhood revitalization. I do not believe that we can accomplish the kind of success visioned in the URAP prognam by fragmenting our limited resources in order to finance portions of proposal submissions. Such an action would undercut th intent of the program. Further. this URAP cycle is unique in that the av ilable resources match the financing requests of the top three � rated propo als. � There was c nsiderable Council discussion and debate during the first cycle process con erning the question of partial financing for projects. As I � understand t. the result of these deliberations was the recommendation to fund propos ls as completely as possible within the available financing. I � agreed with 'the Council's decision then, and I am recommending that we continue to follow this course of action. � I am hopefu that through our combined efforts, Saint Paul will continue to � receive Sta e assistance for the URAP program. One of the ways to help insure future fina cing support will be to demonstrate our shared commitment to the purpose and goals of the program. This includes the financing and successful implementat�on of quality, comprehensive revitalization projects. Very truly yours, Geor Latimer Mayo , � Attachment 5 ti�.. I , -, . ; - - - - - - - s«�Tt - Citr t�twK ' C��i! •�~� _ ��N•~�� ' C I TY OF SA I NT PA U L C�N�1�r - OEr�RTMEMT •wc -r��vow File N0. � + PED - Community Developme t Council Resolution Presented By Referred To � Committee:- Date Out of Committee By� Date I BESOI.U?ION APPFOVIY(': THE CI?Y OF S�I1R PAUL ECOIiD CTCLE U$BAII �EYI?ALIZA?I011 ►CTIOIi PYOGReM YI�SEA�, the Council of the City of Saint Paul did approve on September 23j 1987, by Resolution 87-1395, guidelines for implementation �I of the City �f Saint Paul l)rban Revitalizatioa Actioa Progr� (URAP) ; and I HHE , the Saint Paul Capital Improvement Budget Committee� the Saint Paul P anning Commission, affected neighborhood District Councils, neighborhood non—profit organizations and city staff have participated in a review rocess of URAP proposal submissions in accordance with the adopted URAP guidelines; now, therefore be it BESQL , that upon the recommendation of the Mayor, with the advice of t e Capital Improvement Budget CoQSnittee� the Council of the City of Sai t Paul hereby recommends the following activities and financing f r inclusion in the Second Cycle Saint Paul Urban Revitalizat'on Action Program: Pro ect Tit e Budget Internation 1 Marketplace $ 1,067,500.00 North End P rtnership II 780,000.00 Concentrat East Side Renewal 2.022.500.00 Total $ 3,870,000.00 and be it COUNCILMEN �� Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays '� In Favor Against By Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date , Certified Passed by Council Secr tary BY By� Approved by Mavor: Date Approved by Mayor foc Submission to Council By By �n�Ti - Ci7r C�EwK I ��K � FIN�NC( G I TY O F SA I NT PA U L CO�`� •H�Rr - O�P�RTMENt v F�I! NO. •lU�. -�u�vOR I � � ' . PED - Community Develo�ment Council Resolution I Presented By a - ' I _ Referred To I Committee: Date Out of Committee �y Date I � Page 2 of 2 FU BF.SOLIIED. that Mayor George Latimer, as Chief Executive Officer of the City of Saint Paul is hereby authorized and directed to submit the Saint Paul Urban Revitalization Action Program for review and comment to the appropriate State of Minnesota agency; and be it FU x BESOLYED, that the Mayor or his designated representative, the Direct r of Planning and Economic Development is flarther authorized to submit the State of Minnesota any assurances, certifications technical hanges or additional information that may be required by the State duri�ig their revieW of the Saint Paul Urban Revitalization Action Program; a d be it FIII Y BESOLUED, that upon notification of approval of the Saint Paul Urban Revitalization Action Program, the Council does hereby authorize he proper City officials to execute the grant agreement and contract b tween the State of Minnesota and the City of Saint Paul for the Urban evitalization Action Program. I COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Nays in Favor Against 8Y Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Certified Passed by Council Secr tary BY gy. Approved by Navor: Date Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council By BY ; � . . . •� I , , i URBAH REVI?ALIZA?IOM AC?IOM PROGRbM FII(AlICI11G SUl4lAgY 2nd Round Finan ing Sources: � Community Develc�pment Block Grant Year XV ( 1989) : $ 1.935,000 �1988 State of Minnesota URAP Fund: a 1,935.000 _._..._.�_...... I �� Total Financing Available: = 3,870,000 ffss��; � � Funding CIB Co�ittee Mayor Log # Pro�ect (in rank order) Eating Requested Reco�ended Reco�ende� U-0721 Inte�rnational Marketplace 86.90 $ 1,067,500 $ 1,067,500 $ 1 ,067,SOi U-0621 Nort End Partnership II 85.60 780,000 780.000 780,OOt U--0521 Conc ntrated E. Side Ren. 85.40 2�062,500 1,022,500 2,022,501 U-0421 Lowe Bluff Revitalization $2.40 1�625�000 1 �000,000 0 , U-0821 Selb Ave. Revitalization 76.00 1,706,500 0 0 U-0321 West Side Gateways 69.20 1,725,000 0 0 U-0921 All oads/West Seventh 64. 13 1,284�500 0 0 U-0322 W. S de Health Center 59.60 260.000 0 0 , ___._,_._ ._._._............._,_ ._..._^_ _ Total Fina cing Requested: $ 10,511 ,800 Total Fina�cing Reco�eaded: ; 3,870.000 ; 3.870.000 i f�� f��f�� I I I� I I I ,I , I . . � � �'�� •�T �. CITY OF SAINT PAUL �� , i o , a '� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � �uuw � DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � �__� ��o� Ae 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 • 612-292-1577 ,..• i GEORGE L^TIMER , MAYOR ; RECEIVED � MEMORANDUM FEB131989 ! CITY CLERK February 7,j 1989 I T0: A1 O�son City�Clerk's Office I FR: Bob f�ammer, URAP Coordinator RE: UBBA�I REVI?ALIZATION ACTION PROGRAM (URAP) PUBLIC HEASING The secondlcycle of the URAP process is now in its final review and approval s age. The City Council hds scheduled a Public Hearing to review the Capital Improvement Budget Committee's financing recommenda ions on: Thursday, February 23, 1989 9:00 A.N. - Council Chambers 3rd Floor City Hall 15 Yest Kellogg Boulevard City Counc�.l notifications schedule all Public Hearings at 9:00 A.M. . However, since the URAP discussion will be only one of the items on the City Counc�l Agenda, the actual time of the Public Hearing may vary. I suggest tt�at you call either the City Clerk's Office (298-�►231) , or myself (22'$-3255) on or after February 20th. The February 23rd Council Agenda wil'1 be published at that time� and we can let you know the exact placementilof the URkP item. If you havi�e any questions or if I can be of any assistance, please don't hesitate to call. Thanks for your continued interest and support of the URAP progr'am. i � � � i j i