98-992�R�Gl�qL
. ����
� h�
, t � �����
�
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
�
Council Fi1e #
Green
61622
. Date
WHEREAS, Department of Fire and Safety Services, 7
requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider
ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, �
two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property herema
Property" and commonly known as 667 Charles Avenue. �ii
follows, to wit: �
vis n of Code Enforcement has
h advisability and necessity of
od ftame strncture with a detached,
refened to as the "Subject
property is legally described as
All of I.ot 19, and Lot 20 BXCEPT the EastzO feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate No.
2 Additian /
WHEREAS, based upon the records in e Ramsey County Recorder's Office and
information obtained by Division of Code E orcement on or before June 15, 1498, the following
are the now known interested or responsib parties for the Subject Property: Tracy G. Moos, 256
Prescou Street, St. Pau1, MI�T 55107-30 ; Commercial Federal Mortgage, 4501 Dodge Street 2nd
Floor, Omaha, NE 68132, Attn: T ie Post, Loan #3153000930009900983
WHEREAS, Division of C e Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Leg" lative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated July 13, 199 ; and
WHEREAS, this o�r informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the
structure located on the S ject Properry is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, s order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structu located on the Subyect Properiy by August 12, 1998; and
this
i, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring
constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
[�REAS, trris nuisance conditlon has not been corrected and Division of Code
nt requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the L,egislative Hearing
the City Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance
the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I,egislative Code, of the tnne, date, place and
�se of the public hearings; and
�R8' - �i9?-
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the I,egislative Hearing Off'icer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, October 20, 1998 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving
testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or
responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to tY�e public peace, health,
safery and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this
structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alte tive by
demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable cod s and ordinances.
TY�e rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be completed within fi n(15) days after the
date of the Council Hearing; and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul Ciry Co ncil on Wednesday, October
28, 1998 and the testimony and evidence including the action take y the Lzgislative Hearing
Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore
BE IT RFSOLVED, that based upon the testimony evidence presented at the above
referenced public hearings, the Sa3nt Paul City Council he y adopts the following Findings and
Order concerning the Subject Property at 667 Charles enue:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the Subject Property comprises
L,egislative Code, Chapier 45.
That the costs of demolition az
three thousand dollars ($3,000
condition as defined in Saint Paul
of this buiiding(s) is estunated to exceed
That there now exists and s existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at
the Subject Property.
That an Order to Aba Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible
parties to correct th deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the
That I
which
That
causing this nuisance wndition have not been conected.
f Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property
it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
building has been routinely monitored by the Depamnent of Fire and Safety
Division of Code Enforcement, VacanUNuisance Buildings.
the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this
stion and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. e above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe
and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting
influence on the communiry by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as
prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with
all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the
structure in accordance with ail appiicabie codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or
demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the
date of the Council Heazing.
ORIGINAL
�
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ar-���-
2. If the above conective action is not compieted within this period of time the Fire and Safety,
Services, Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are
necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred
against the Sub}ect Property pursuant to rhe provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul
L,egislative Code. _
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Sa' Paui, all
personal properry or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolit3 and removal
shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the en of this time period.
If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be ab doned and the City
of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provide y law.
4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resoluuon be mailed to e owners and interested
parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of ffie Saint Paul L,eg' ative Code.
lT'�
�a.'
�� \��
l�\�
Navs
Requested by Department of:
F' e� Enfo �Cement Division
By• _
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by C u
By:
Approved by Mayor• Date
1 Secretary
Form Approved by City Attorney
BY � �4 � `��.� � .Lrn
Approved �y Mayor for
to
By:
a�-q��-
Division of Code Enforcement
DATE INRUITED
a9nsr9a I GREEN SHEET
No
slsz2
292-7�18
October 28, 1998 Public Heaxing
TOTAL#aFSIGNATURE
�.µ,.��,�
�
NUMfl9tFOR �4IYAiTOlIEY OIYCLFRK
eounx�
onoEx ❑AUxcu�amucFSOn wuxeYU.o
� WYORf 4fafT41T� ❑
:S (CLlP LOCATtONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Ciry Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced
building(s). If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Department o£ Fire and Safety Services,
Division of Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at
667 Charles Avenue.
PLANN WG COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CMI. SERVICE COMMISSION
Has this Pe���n eNer wurked utMer a contract forthis tlePa�ertt?
vES n�o ,
Flasthia pneonlfiim ever 6een a cily empbyae?
YES NO
Dcea this personifirtn possese a sidll not normallypossessed by any curtent cily empbyee?
YES t�
IsMU p�vsonlfirm a tarpeted vendo/t .
YES NO
This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in
Chapter 43 of the Saint Pau1 Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties Irnoum
to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue by
August 12, 1998, and have failed to cornply with those orders.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO �
.��'''zs-.Kt";. "��� ,-i
�"r��e�aa � ��
REC�:l�E4�
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
OCT 1� 1998 ��� u � 3 �� g
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the
property, collected as a special assessment against the properiy tases.
A nuisance condifion wili remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight fhe
community.
> - ,
OTALAMOUNTOFSRANSACTfONt COETIREVQiUEBUD6EfED(qACLEOti� YES NO
Nuisance Housing Abatement 2b1
UNDIN6SOURCE ACTNIT'NUMBER
INFORMATION (EXPWN)
�i�'t�t'��. s�, ��t"=.�?F
OCT � P� ����
. , . , � � ' , ' ' , , , � I , I � I , I
. ., � � , , � � � � � , , � , , , � , ' , ' ' �'l
' . ' ����G 0��: I , . , ' , ' , - ,
, , '„ ' - ' „ � , , , , ,� � , , � , i � � � ,
��
.
„
,
BEIOW'ffiCCOIZCCY ���� 'SLYll108CfC OY . , , ,
' , , , IWIGI7gS �}lC , , , , QQI]�tt�(�,4 �OCl�CdfS � � , � �
�
,� , , , , , , , . . � ,
, � , , , i , �I ,
,
� � �
.
, . . , , , � , , , ,
' CONTRACTS(ass�essutfiorizedbudgeYeiri.sts} COU2�TCII,RESOLUITON(amendtitidget4/acce�t'grauts)�
, � � 1'. Oirtside Agency � � � � , � � 1. 17epsctmentS�9tecctor ' � , � ' � � � �� � � � � �
� � Z.' ,DeP,mimentDit�ctor � � �� � 2. Officeof$inancialSavicesDuetjor � � � � �-
- 3: CityAttaaey 9 City'AttomeY' , .
� � � �, MayodAssistmt�foicontractsoven$Z5,000)' 4 Ivi�/�sts�'� � �� �
� � s � I�nx;�s (r«contiactsover�aso,000j , s. cilg�cwmcii` ,� , � ���� �� � � � � � '� �; ��,� �
6.' Office ofFinancial Seivicas - Accouatin8 6 Office o�Finmcisl Ser,d�ces , A�oumrin8,
nnn�rusrx�� oxDIIZS �s�tx���) caurrcu.�sat�;czor� f�t� �t o�a,��>'
y 1. nctrv�tyManagcrorl�epa�ncAc�mtanc � 1 Depachnentnue�wr � �� � �
2.' De�mtmeofiD�rector", . 2 Cri� '
' , , 3: OfficeofFin�ciaiServicesDirector 3. MaporlA.ssisFsnt'
' � � �. �CityClak � ' � � � � � � � �4. CityComcil" ` � r �' , ' �� � � �
� � S. OI&ce ofFinaricial Sckvices - Awotmting � �' � � � � � � �
� Ai�h9AIIS�TRATIVE ORDIItS (alt��s) ER8CUITVE OI2DE[t �, � � �� � � � �
� � 1.�,Depazfm�tDuebtor � � � � � � i. Depac�D�ct�, ' ' � , � J , �
�
, 2: CitpAVaney� � � � � �' ' � 2. City,� ` „ `� �
� " � 3. OEce�,qfFSnancial§ervice§,Director ', 3�.'-]vtay�le e�;i
� ' C�S Cletk 4, C'rtp'Clak
,� r � i � , � � � � �� �
TOTALNGANBEROFSIGNAT(JREPAGES ��„ ����,� � � � � � � �� � � �
' 7ndicate tUe # of pages om.which signatutes mc trqssired anci papemlip or flag each of Wese pages
� � QCT[ONREQUESTED �� � � � � � , � ' � � � �� ,
Descnbe,wlietfheprojxf/cequestseeksto�comRlishineithercLcnnologicalo�slerorocderofim�wrYanee whiclu�vecLS ,
mostappm�piiete'f�Sl�issae. Donotwritecampl�esente�ces. Begin'earhifem;inyoittLst�witfi'averb. ', '
�
� , � � ��,� � ' , _
„ ., ,�
. �o���
°c���e��e����r��a,��s�r�lioar��.� � � � �
' � � �'ERSONAL SE12�IGE CONERACTS: � � �� � � � � � � � � � � �
, „
`Tlris iofomnati� will bensedto detee�ine tfie city's habilrtyfa compensation clazms. tazies andpmper civ�I
' , , secvice Birmg x�es. , � � , '
„ �
�� IId1TIATIL�IG�'ROBLIIy1, ISSUE, OPPOItTUNiTY � � �� � � � � � ° � ' �
Eiiplsiull� situalion or �kions thet caeBYed a need foryoia pco�ect or teqUest ' �
�
� . � ��
� � � � � „ �
,
.
ADVANfAGES7FAPPRONID , � ,
Tndicate wlu,� rUis is simrly an,�mtal b�g�n=�,�i� �Y�i� � wheiher rfieie etz sp�ifie wsys m,
" , wluchibeCityofSamtP�ulandif§citiienswill6enefit;fiomfhSspmjecf/echon. , � '
� � � � � � � �
� �� �
: y ,
� � � DLSAD�ADFF�IG�S IF APPROVED� � � , � �� ' � � � �
Wfiat�galive eEects or me,jor cke�, to c�asEinB � P��P� �8� � P�J��4�tP�o�ace rf rt isgassed ,
(e,g.,�cdefays,�ise,teicimaeases�'asses�enis)7 To �wliom? Wheu7Forfiovrl"ong? . ''
� �
„ � DISADV� � PA(�S4�NOTAR�RO�oED, � �" �� �
� . „� � , � � � rate� xevenue7 � ��� � � � � � � � � �
r
What wrll betLe v ifthe prp�sed ad�on is noY u ?,Tnab�lityto dekvei secnce? -Ca�mte
htgk tr�o no�se accident —
� FINANCIAL,,3MPAC1' , � � � . �� � , � � � � �
ttlthousli �cxt'mnsc ta�lor ffie i�«mafiori you pmyiae ]na� w rhe�e ybu ��d�n�, m�erat xwx masr answer
4uro',qaestions: Hovamuch is it going to' cwst`! ' Who.is going,to, payt? , '
� �
� � � � � ��� ��
'
,
� � . � � � „ �� „' � �� � �
„
, „
� ��� .r
, � � �
�
� �
, � �
�� � ,
�
, , �u .� � ,' .f..�a....,. !!. wuu . . ., u. . f Iti..,.:A,d .u��i�utL�.n���o-„I��JwI.� , f�� a�,� �, ,�.,� �b iJ �w;lti�i1�'ra§e1� r�i�� I �,�%",��.�
("a g - a1`1 �
,
MINLTTES OF TI� LEGISLATNE HEARING
Tuesday, November 17, 1998
Room 330, City Hall
Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel and Guy Willits, Code Enforcement
Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 328 Le�npton Parkway North.
Mohammed Shahidullah, owner, appeazed and stated he received a letter to cut the grass. When
Mr. Shahidullah went to the property, he found there was no grass except for some tall weeds in
vazious spots. Gerry Strathman asked could these weeds be cut down. Mr. Shahidullah
responded there is nothing to cut; he just pulled them out.
Chuck Votel reported the gzass was probably sparse, howevez Code Enforcement received
complaints about it. Mohammed Shahidullah responded someone complained in a false manner
and he got blamed. Mr. Shahidullah feels he does not have good communication skilis. When
he explains his position, he makes enemies.
Gerry Strathman stated if there are any weeds over 8 inches tall, Mohatnlned Shahidullah should
get rid of them. Mr. Shahidullah stated there is nothing there to cut and he is afraid the City wili
send him a bill for $400, Mr. Strathman asked Guy Willits would he be willing to go with Mr.
Shahidullah to look at the property. Mr. Willits agreed.
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal, however, Guy Willits will meet with
Mohammed Shahidullab today at 11:00 a.m. at the property. At that time, Mr. Shahidullah will
be told what needs to be cut.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or reuair the building at 907 Margaret Street
(rear housel. If the owner fails to comply with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the buildin�.
Chuck Votel reported this property is owned by Giulio and Mary Casci. There is storm damage,
but the property was in bad shape before the storm. The owners have signed a registration form
for the vacant buildings program acknowledging that they would like to have the City remove the
building. Removing the building will result in an assessment of over $10,000. There is a party
on record who has a banki�uptcy interest in the property. This resolution would order the owner
to remove or repair the property in five days.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval.
�����'
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINU'I'ES OF 11-17-98
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 681 Vir2inia Street
Page 2
Chuck Votel reported the inspector Hazold Robinson issued an order to secure the garage door.
Since then, Mr. Robinson has spoken to the appellant and gave her an extension of time to
complete the work. The work is now done. This summary abatement order has been withdrawn.
(Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildine. (Laid over from 10-20-98)
Guy Willits reported the building is now up to code. This resolution has been withdrawn by
Code Enforcement.
(Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
�
�� J���
REPORT
i��Ct'JGy4 V Y\�/�7:1�7i�.�1►Ci1
Date: November 17,1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
Geiry Strathman
Legislative Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order appeal for 328 Lexineton Parkway North.
Legislative Heazing Officer recommended denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bullding at 907 Mar¢aret Street
{rear house). If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommended apptoval.
3. Summary Abatement drder appeal for 681 Vir�nia Street.
Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement This matter is closed.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Chazles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 10-20-98)
Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.
DEPARTMENI' OF F7RE A,�ID SAFETY SERVICES
T+molhy K Fulle�. Fire Chiej ��
DIVIS[ON OF PROPERTY CODE E�IFORCE[.�"NT
Charles Yote� Program Director �
CITY OF SAIN'f PALJL Nuisance Buitding Code Ersforcement
h'orm Coleman, iLfayor SSS Cedor Street T¢b 6i1-298-4153
S¢int Paul, hLY S�IOi-1?60 Fai: b51-??8-3150
i
September 25, 1998
G6U�1C:� � �.'�,�^
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS �`
Council President and
Members of the City Council
t' � �:;
Department of Fire and Safery Services, VacanUNuisance Buildings Enforcement Division
has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the
repair or removal of the nuisance buildin�(s) located at:
667 Charles Avenue
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legisiative Hearing - Tuesday, October 20, 1998
City Councii Aearing - Wednesday, October 28, I998
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and I,ast Known Address
Tracy G. Moos
256 Prescott Street
St. Paui, MN 55107-3036
Interest
Fee Owner
Commercial Federal Mortga;e
4501 Aodge Street 2nd Floor
Omaha, NE 68132
Attn: Tammie Post
Loan #3�53000930009900983
The legal desciiption of this property is:
Fee Owner
All of Lot 19, and Lot 20 EXCEPT the East 20 feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate
No. 2 Addition.
667 Charles Avenue
September 25, 1998
Page 2
��.�q
Division of Code Enforcement has declared this buildin�(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as
defined by I.egisiative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order
to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the
deficiencies or by razing and removing this building{s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition zemains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blightin� influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
orderin� the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a
timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to
demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special
assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes.
Si C ely,
�� L
i I , ' i ��� 3 1�,
� ��af
Rene Weiss
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Department of Fire and Safety Services
RW:ml
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design
Rachel Young, City Attorneys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Steve Zaccard, Fire Marshall
Paul Mordorski, PED-Housing Division
01-98
�I �''��
REPORT
Date: October 20, 1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
L.egislative Hearing Off'icer
1. Summary Abatement Appeal for 1904 Jefferson Avenue.
(Laid over from 10-6-98)
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends amending the order to remove or repair within
45 days.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 17, 1998
legislative hearing.
� � r 1 � �
, -NII1#TiT�S QF �'I3EL£sGIS�3`IVE FIEARING
__ :Il' .�a 3'YT ��_. _'.J - -
Tuesday, October 20, 1998 � --
��,�_ _. ..__., _, ..-.,_ ._..=z - -. �,-:., _::= Room.�O,;Cit1'_�:° -- - , se c,; .. : t:. - — :;:t
_ �- _ = - - _ -,__ _. :..
�taff Present: Terry D.'Rourkg,.Parks �nd Izecreation; Chuck Votel, Go�e Eaforcement; Richard
�'�er,-�arks and �eczeation; �uy_ Willits,.-�ade Enforc_ement-_ ._ -, ,_.._
= Gerry Siratt�man called.the meeting Yo vrde,r at 10:00 am. _ _ = _ _- _- _ - -
_ ��- - - - - -
. _ . _ _,,._ _
• -
; ,z - - - -
Summarv Abatement Apueal for �1904 7efferson Avenue. (Laid over from 10-6-98)
�:� ;:�:���.
Gerry Strathman stated this item was laid over because there were a number of differences as to
�uhat }�appene�: :�ere was �ot_anyone. from tk�e x�az�� �re�;pteseuX at meeting .nor
�v_asfihe�e av�deotape availabje. C�it�ck 3?oiel-resgonded �ere is av�depta�e aaw and
�f the c�eau�p crew aze �ere as-�e11. _, ___ - _ `
�rl.vide,atape was shoEVn.of�l�e�crge?tY befQrethe.�leanug_ansia�teFurards.). _.. -_.- _ - , -_
��erry Stratlu�an asked for the basis of #he appeal _R. .Donald,Hawkinson responded the garage
door was closed before ihe-cleanup crew,arrived, ffie-crew wrongfully opened the gazage door,
and they did not have a seazch warrant.
Richazd Weiner and Teny D Rourke, �uho,both zvorked on the cleanup of this srte, appeazed.
Gerry Strathman asked was the gazage door open when they azrived. Mr. O'Rourke respondad
the door was open_about 2,feet, which was enough for him to see_ inside o£ it.. _--. .
G. Donald Hawkinson stated he has two letters from neighbors indicafing the garage door was
-unlocked. (Mr, Hawkinson presented these letters to Gerry Strathman.) One letter was from
Gene Baum and the other was from I.orraine McEvoy, both of 1901 Juliet Avenue. Mr.
Strathman stated neither letter indicates whether the garage door was open or closed.
Sharon Bougie stated the gazage had been broken into. It had previously be�n nailed closed. 'Tiie
only way to get into the gazage was with a gazage door opener. After the City crew had taken her
belongings out of the garage, they damaged the opener. Ms. Bougie could not enter her gazage.
She had to open another door which had previously been barred closed in order to gain access.
Gerry Strathman stated there aze two issues here: 1) Whether this was a legal or illegal entry into
the properiy, 2) Was the owner properly notified and did the City crew do the cleanup. The
entry issue cannot be resolved here because this hearing is not a judicial setting, As for the other
issue, paperwork indicates no6ces were mailed on several occasions. (Chuck Votel presented
copies of notices that were mailed.)
q�-aqa�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES FROM 10-20-98
Page 2
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal citing notice was given and the cleanup was
done. Mr. Strathman informetlYhe appellants that if they disagreed with his decision, a notice
can be filed with Mr. Strathman by noon of October 22. This notice will be provided to the
councilmembers for considerarion before making their fmal decision on this matter at the
October 28 City Council meeting.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
ff the owner fails to complv svith the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
�astor David Johnson, co-pastor of Unity Baptist Church, appeared �
Chuck Votel reported this building has been vacant since May 6, 1997. The cunent property
owner is the Open Door Baptist Church. The church has not indicated what they intend to do
with the property. Nineteen summary abatement notices have been issued for nuisance
violations. A citation has been issued to the owner for failing to pay the vacant building fee. 'I'he
real estate taYes aze unpaid. Ramsey Counry Ta�cation has placed an estimated market value on
the property of $45,300. The Code Enforcement officers estimated the cost to repair the structure
is $b0,000 to $200,000 depending on the final usage of the building. The cost to demolish is
$9,000 to $10,000.
Pastor David 7ohnson stated their plan is to demolish the building. The owner is Unity Baptist
Church. Uniry Baptist Church is a merged congregation of two former churches named Pazk
Baptist Church and Open Door Baptist Church. The merger occurred in February 1998. The
reason for the difficulty in caring for the building was caused by the transition. The church has
received tentative approval �f a loan to demolish the building. The estimated cost of the
demolition is $25,000. Mr. 7ohnson requested additional time for final approval of the loan and
to demolish the building.
Gerry Strathman asked about the difference betwe�n the church estimate and Code
EnforcemenYs estimate. Chuck Votel responded Code EnforcemenYs estimate is from
demolition contractors, but it does not inciude asbestos removal nor additional garbage removal.
Asbestos removal can be thousands of dollazs, however the difference between the estimates sull
seems high. Pastor David Johnson stated his recollection is that the contractor said the cost for
the asbestos abatement would be $16,000. Mr. Strathman stated if the City has a lower bid, the
church should find out the name of that company,
Gerry Strathman asked how long it will take to get this building demolished. Pastor David
7ohnson responded it is contingent on getting financing. The goal was to have the building
removed before freezing, and that is not faz from now.
Gerry Strathman asked if he grants additional time, can he be assured the property will be kepY
clean. Pastor David 3ohnson responded he cannot promise that. The trash is dumped from other
� ' q ��-
LEGISLATIVE HEAItING MINLJ'I'ES FROM 10-20-98 Page 3
people. The church does not have the zesources nor the people to take care of the dumping. The
church has contracted with the Thomas Dale Block Club, however they have not been efficient.
Gerry Strathman asked is the structure dangerous. Chuck Votel responded it is constanUy open
and orders have to be issued to have it secured, but it is not dangerous.
Gerry Strathman recommended amending the order to remove or repair within 45 days. Pastor
David Johnson stated he has no problem with this recommendation.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue If
the owner faiis to comnlv with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildin¢.
Ying Vang and Pang Vang appeared and stated they purchased the building from Tracy Moos on
September 18, 1998. Ying Vang stated they aze almost done with repairing the building. Two
family members aze ready to move in after the building is reinspected.
Chuck Votel reported that the building is close to being ready for reinspection. The new owners
have obtained a code compliance inspection; they have plumbing and building pernuts. They
still need to get an electrical pertnit, and the furnace needs some work before it can be signed off.
Mr. Votel suggested this matter be laid over for a while.
Xing Vang stated he had the furnace tested by St. Paul Plumbing and Heating Company. Pang
Vang stated they have to finish the bathroom floor and the gutters.
Gerry Strathman recommended laying over to the November 17, 19981egislative hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 a.m.
rrn
�R�Gl�qL
. ����
� h�
, t � �����
�
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
�
Council Fi1e #
Green
61622
. Date
WHEREAS, Department of Fire and Safety Services, 7
requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider
ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, �
two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property herema
Property" and commonly known as 667 Charles Avenue. �ii
follows, to wit: �
vis n of Code Enforcement has
h advisability and necessity of
od ftame strncture with a detached,
refened to as the "Subject
property is legally described as
All of I.ot 19, and Lot 20 BXCEPT the EastzO feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate No.
2 Additian /
WHEREAS, based upon the records in e Ramsey County Recorder's Office and
information obtained by Division of Code E orcement on or before June 15, 1498, the following
are the now known interested or responsib parties for the Subject Property: Tracy G. Moos, 256
Prescou Street, St. Pau1, MI�T 55107-30 ; Commercial Federal Mortgage, 4501 Dodge Street 2nd
Floor, Omaha, NE 68132, Attn: T ie Post, Loan #3153000930009900983
WHEREAS, Division of C e Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Leg" lative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated July 13, 199 ; and
WHEREAS, this o�r informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the
structure located on the S ject Properry is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, s order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structu located on the Subyect Properiy by August 12, 1998; and
this
i, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring
constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
[�REAS, trris nuisance conditlon has not been corrected and Division of Code
nt requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the L,egislative Hearing
the City Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance
the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I,egislative Code, of the tnne, date, place and
�se of the public hearings; and
�R8' - �i9?-
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the I,egislative Hearing Off'icer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, October 20, 1998 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving
testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or
responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to tY�e public peace, health,
safery and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this
structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alte tive by
demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable cod s and ordinances.
TY�e rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be completed within fi n(15) days after the
date of the Council Hearing; and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul Ciry Co ncil on Wednesday, October
28, 1998 and the testimony and evidence including the action take y the Lzgislative Hearing
Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore
BE IT RFSOLVED, that based upon the testimony evidence presented at the above
referenced public hearings, the Sa3nt Paul City Council he y adopts the following Findings and
Order concerning the Subject Property at 667 Charles enue:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the Subject Property comprises
L,egislative Code, Chapier 45.
That the costs of demolition az
three thousand dollars ($3,000
condition as defined in Saint Paul
of this buiiding(s) is estunated to exceed
That there now exists and s existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at
the Subject Property.
That an Order to Aba Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible
parties to correct th deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the
That I
which
That
causing this nuisance wndition have not been conected.
f Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property
it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
building has been routinely monitored by the Depamnent of Fire and Safety
Division of Code Enforcement, VacanUNuisance Buildings.
the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this
stion and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. e above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe
and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting
influence on the communiry by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as
prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with
all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the
structure in accordance with ail appiicabie codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or
demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the
date of the Council Heazing.
ORIGINAL
�
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ar-���-
2. If the above conective action is not compieted within this period of time the Fire and Safety,
Services, Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are
necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred
against the Sub}ect Property pursuant to rhe provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul
L,egislative Code. _
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Sa' Paui, all
personal properry or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolit3 and removal
shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the en of this time period.
If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be ab doned and the City
of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provide y law.
4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resoluuon be mailed to e owners and interested
parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of ffie Saint Paul L,eg' ative Code.
lT'�
�a.'
�� \��
l�\�
Navs
Requested by Department of:
F' e� Enfo �Cement Division
By• _
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by C u
By:
Approved by Mayor• Date
1 Secretary
Form Approved by City Attorney
BY � �4 � `��.� � .Lrn
Approved �y Mayor for
to
By:
a�-q��-
Division of Code Enforcement
DATE INRUITED
a9nsr9a I GREEN SHEET
No
slsz2
292-7�18
October 28, 1998 Public Heaxing
TOTAL#aFSIGNATURE
�.µ,.��,�
�
NUMfl9tFOR �4IYAiTOlIEY OIYCLFRK
eounx�
onoEx ❑AUxcu�amucFSOn wuxeYU.o
� WYORf 4fafT41T� ❑
:S (CLlP LOCATtONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Ciry Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced
building(s). If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Department o£ Fire and Safety Services,
Division of Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at
667 Charles Avenue.
PLANN WG COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CMI. SERVICE COMMISSION
Has this Pe���n eNer wurked utMer a contract forthis tlePa�ertt?
vES n�o ,
Flasthia pneonlfiim ever 6een a cily empbyae?
YES NO
Dcea this personifirtn possese a sidll not normallypossessed by any curtent cily empbyee?
YES t�
IsMU p�vsonlfirm a tarpeted vendo/t .
YES NO
This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in
Chapter 43 of the Saint Pau1 Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties Irnoum
to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue by
August 12, 1998, and have failed to cornply with those orders.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO �
.��'''zs-.Kt";. "��� ,-i
�"r��e�aa � ��
REC�:l�E4�
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
OCT 1� 1998 ��� u � 3 �� g
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the
property, collected as a special assessment against the properiy tases.
A nuisance condifion wili remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight fhe
community.
> - ,
OTALAMOUNTOFSRANSACTfONt COETIREVQiUEBUD6EfED(qACLEOti� YES NO
Nuisance Housing Abatement 2b1
UNDIN6SOURCE ACTNIT'NUMBER
INFORMATION (EXPWN)
�i�'t�t'��. s�, ��t"=.�?F
OCT � P� ����
. , . , � � ' , ' ' , , , � I , I � I , I
. ., � � , , � � � � � , , � , , , � , ' , ' ' �'l
' . ' ����G 0��: I , . , ' , ' , - ,
, , '„ ' - ' „ � , , , , ,� � , , � , i � � � ,
��
.
„
,
BEIOW'ffiCCOIZCCY ���� 'SLYll108CfC OY . , , ,
' , , , IWIGI7gS �}lC , , , , QQI]�tt�(�,4 �OCl�CdfS � � , � �
�
,� , , , , , , , . . � ,
, � , , , i , �I ,
,
� � �
.
, . . , , , � , , , ,
' CONTRACTS(ass�essutfiorizedbudgeYeiri.sts} COU2�TCII,RESOLUITON(amendtitidget4/acce�t'grauts)�
, � � 1'. Oirtside Agency � � � � , � � 1. 17epsctmentS�9tecctor ' � , � ' � � � �� � � � � �
� � Z.' ,DeP,mimentDit�ctor � � �� � 2. Officeof$inancialSavicesDuetjor � � � � �-
- 3: CityAttaaey 9 City'AttomeY' , .
� � � �, MayodAssistmt�foicontractsoven$Z5,000)' 4 Ivi�/�sts�'� � �� �
� � s � I�nx;�s (r«contiactsover�aso,000j , s. cilg�cwmcii` ,� , � ���� �� � � � � � '� �; ��,� �
6.' Office ofFinancial Seivicas - Accouatin8 6 Office o�Finmcisl Ser,d�ces , A�oumrin8,
nnn�rusrx�� oxDIIZS �s�tx���) caurrcu.�sat�;czor� f�t� �t o�a,��>'
y 1. nctrv�tyManagcrorl�epa�ncAc�mtanc � 1 Depachnentnue�wr � �� � �
2.' De�mtmeofiD�rector", . 2 Cri� '
' , , 3: OfficeofFin�ciaiServicesDirector 3. MaporlA.ssisFsnt'
' � � �. �CityClak � ' � � � � � � � �4. CityComcil" ` � r �' , ' �� � � �
� � S. OI&ce ofFinaricial Sckvices - Awotmting � �' � � � � � � �
� Ai�h9AIIS�TRATIVE ORDIItS (alt��s) ER8CUITVE OI2DE[t �, � � �� � � � �
� � 1.�,Depazfm�tDuebtor � � � � � � i. Depac�D�ct�, ' ' � , � J , �
�
, 2: CitpAVaney� � � � � �' ' � 2. City,� ` „ `� �
� " � 3. OEce�,qfFSnancial§ervice§,Director ', 3�.'-]vtay�le e�;i
� ' C�S Cletk 4, C'rtp'Clak
,� r � i � , � � � � �� �
TOTALNGANBEROFSIGNAT(JREPAGES ��„ ����,� � � � � � � �� � � �
' 7ndicate tUe # of pages om.which signatutes mc trqssired anci papemlip or flag each of Wese pages
� � QCT[ONREQUESTED �� � � � � � , � ' � � � �� ,
Descnbe,wlietfheprojxf/cequestseeksto�comRlishineithercLcnnologicalo�slerorocderofim�wrYanee whiclu�vecLS ,
mostappm�piiete'f�Sl�issae. Donotwritecampl�esente�ces. Begin'earhifem;inyoittLst�witfi'averb. ', '
�
� , � � ��,� � ' , _
„ ., ,�
. �o���
°c���e��e����r��a,��s�r�lioar��.� � � � �
' � � �'ERSONAL SE12�IGE CONERACTS: � � �� � � � � � � � � � � �
, „
`Tlris iofomnati� will bensedto detee�ine tfie city's habilrtyfa compensation clazms. tazies andpmper civ�I
' , , secvice Birmg x�es. , � � , '
„ �
�� IId1TIATIL�IG�'ROBLIIy1, ISSUE, OPPOItTUNiTY � � �� � � � � � ° � ' �
Eiiplsiull� situalion or �kions thet caeBYed a need foryoia pco�ect or teqUest ' �
�
� . � ��
� � � � � „ �
,
.
ADVANfAGES7FAPPRONID , � ,
Tndicate wlu,� rUis is simrly an,�mtal b�g�n=�,�i� �Y�i� � wheiher rfieie etz sp�ifie wsys m,
" , wluchibeCityofSamtP�ulandif§citiienswill6enefit;fiomfhSspmjecf/echon. , � '
� � � � � � � �
� �� �
: y ,
� � � DLSAD�ADFF�IG�S IF APPROVED� � � , � �� ' � � � �
Wfiat�galive eEects or me,jor cke�, to c�asEinB � P��P� �8� � P�J��4�tP�o�ace rf rt isgassed ,
(e,g.,�cdefays,�ise,teicimaeases�'asses�enis)7 To �wliom? Wheu7Forfiovrl"ong? . ''
� �
„ � DISADV� � PA(�S4�NOTAR�RO�oED, � �" �� �
� . „� � , � � � rate� xevenue7 � ��� � � � � � � � � �
r
What wrll betLe v ifthe prp�sed ad�on is noY u ?,Tnab�lityto dekvei secnce? -Ca�mte
htgk tr�o no�se accident —
� FINANCIAL,,3MPAC1' , � � � . �� � , � � � � �
ttlthousli �cxt'mnsc ta�lor ffie i�«mafiori you pmyiae ]na� w rhe�e ybu ��d�n�, m�erat xwx masr answer
4uro',qaestions: Hovamuch is it going to' cwst`! ' Who.is going,to, payt? , '
� �
� � � � � ��� ��
'
,
� � . � � � „ �� „' � �� � �
„
, „
� ��� .r
, � � �
�
� �
, � �
�� � ,
�
, , �u .� � ,' .f..�a....,. !!. wuu . . ., u. . f Iti..,.:A,d .u��i�utL�.n���o-„I��JwI.� , f�� a�,� �, ,�.,� �b iJ �w;lti�i1�'ra§e1� r�i�� I �,�%",��.�
("a g - a1`1 �
,
MINLTTES OF TI� LEGISLATNE HEARING
Tuesday, November 17, 1998
Room 330, City Hall
Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel and Guy Willits, Code Enforcement
Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 328 Le�npton Parkway North.
Mohammed Shahidullah, owner, appeazed and stated he received a letter to cut the grass. When
Mr. Shahidullah went to the property, he found there was no grass except for some tall weeds in
vazious spots. Gerry Strathman asked could these weeds be cut down. Mr. Shahidullah
responded there is nothing to cut; he just pulled them out.
Chuck Votel reported the gzass was probably sparse, howevez Code Enforcement received
complaints about it. Mohammed Shahidullah responded someone complained in a false manner
and he got blamed. Mr. Shahidullah feels he does not have good communication skilis. When
he explains his position, he makes enemies.
Gerry Strathman stated if there are any weeds over 8 inches tall, Mohatnlned Shahidullah should
get rid of them. Mr. Shahidullah stated there is nothing there to cut and he is afraid the City wili
send him a bill for $400, Mr. Strathman asked Guy Willits would he be willing to go with Mr.
Shahidullah to look at the property. Mr. Willits agreed.
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal, however, Guy Willits will meet with
Mohammed Shahidullab today at 11:00 a.m. at the property. At that time, Mr. Shahidullah will
be told what needs to be cut.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or reuair the building at 907 Margaret Street
(rear housel. If the owner fails to comply with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the buildin�.
Chuck Votel reported this property is owned by Giulio and Mary Casci. There is storm damage,
but the property was in bad shape before the storm. The owners have signed a registration form
for the vacant buildings program acknowledging that they would like to have the City remove the
building. Removing the building will result in an assessment of over $10,000. There is a party
on record who has a banki�uptcy interest in the property. This resolution would order the owner
to remove or repair the property in five days.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval.
�����'
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINU'I'ES OF 11-17-98
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 681 Vir2inia Street
Page 2
Chuck Votel reported the inspector Hazold Robinson issued an order to secure the garage door.
Since then, Mr. Robinson has spoken to the appellant and gave her an extension of time to
complete the work. The work is now done. This summary abatement order has been withdrawn.
(Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildine. (Laid over from 10-20-98)
Guy Willits reported the building is now up to code. This resolution has been withdrawn by
Code Enforcement.
(Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
�
�� J���
REPORT
i��Ct'JGy4 V Y\�/�7:1�7i�.�1►Ci1
Date: November 17,1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
Geiry Strathman
Legislative Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order appeal for 328 Lexineton Parkway North.
Legislative Heazing Officer recommended denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bullding at 907 Mar¢aret Street
{rear house). If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommended apptoval.
3. Summary Abatement drder appeal for 681 Vir�nia Street.
Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement This matter is closed.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Chazles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 10-20-98)
Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.
DEPARTMENI' OF F7RE A,�ID SAFETY SERVICES
T+molhy K Fulle�. Fire Chiej ��
DIVIS[ON OF PROPERTY CODE E�IFORCE[.�"NT
Charles Yote� Program Director �
CITY OF SAIN'f PALJL Nuisance Buitding Code Ersforcement
h'orm Coleman, iLfayor SSS Cedor Street T¢b 6i1-298-4153
S¢int Paul, hLY S�IOi-1?60 Fai: b51-??8-3150
i
September 25, 1998
G6U�1C:� � �.'�,�^
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS �`
Council President and
Members of the City Council
t' � �:;
Department of Fire and Safery Services, VacanUNuisance Buildings Enforcement Division
has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the
repair or removal of the nuisance buildin�(s) located at:
667 Charles Avenue
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legisiative Hearing - Tuesday, October 20, 1998
City Councii Aearing - Wednesday, October 28, I998
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and I,ast Known Address
Tracy G. Moos
256 Prescott Street
St. Paui, MN 55107-3036
Interest
Fee Owner
Commercial Federal Mortga;e
4501 Aodge Street 2nd Floor
Omaha, NE 68132
Attn: Tammie Post
Loan #3�53000930009900983
The legal desciiption of this property is:
Fee Owner
All of Lot 19, and Lot 20 EXCEPT the East 20 feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate
No. 2 Addition.
667 Charles Avenue
September 25, 1998
Page 2
��.�q
Division of Code Enforcement has declared this buildin�(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as
defined by I.egisiative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order
to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the
deficiencies or by razing and removing this building{s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition zemains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blightin� influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
orderin� the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a
timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to
demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special
assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes.
Si C ely,
�� L
i I , ' i ��� 3 1�,
� ��af
Rene Weiss
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Department of Fire and Safety Services
RW:ml
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design
Rachel Young, City Attorneys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Steve Zaccard, Fire Marshall
Paul Mordorski, PED-Housing Division
01-98
�I �''��
REPORT
Date: October 20, 1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
L.egislative Hearing Off'icer
1. Summary Abatement Appeal for 1904 Jefferson Avenue.
(Laid over from 10-6-98)
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends amending the order to remove or repair within
45 days.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 17, 1998
legislative hearing.
� � r 1 � �
, -NII1#TiT�S QF �'I3EL£sGIS�3`IVE FIEARING
__ :Il' .�a 3'YT ��_. _'.J - -
Tuesday, October 20, 1998 � --
��,�_ _. ..__., _, ..-.,_ ._..=z - -. �,-:., _::= Room.�O,;Cit1'_�:° -- - , se c,; .. : t:. - — :;:t
_ �- _ = - - _ -,__ _. :..
�taff Present: Terry D.'Rourkg,.Parks �nd Izecreation; Chuck Votel, Go�e Eaforcement; Richard
�'�er,-�arks and �eczeation; �uy_ Willits,.-�ade Enforc_ement-_ ._ -, ,_.._
= Gerry Siratt�man called.the meeting Yo vrde,r at 10:00 am. _ _ = _ _- _- _ - -
_ ��- - - - - -
. _ . _ _,,._ _
• -
; ,z - - - -
Summarv Abatement Apueal for �1904 7efferson Avenue. (Laid over from 10-6-98)
�:� ;:�:���.
Gerry Strathman stated this item was laid over because there were a number of differences as to
�uhat }�appene�: :�ere was �ot_anyone. from tk�e x�az�� �re�;pteseuX at meeting .nor
�v_asfihe�e av�deotape availabje. C�it�ck 3?oiel-resgonded �ere is av�depta�e aaw and
�f the c�eau�p crew aze �ere as-�e11. _, ___ - _ `
�rl.vide,atape was shoEVn.of�l�e�crge?tY befQrethe.�leanug_ansia�teFurards.). _.. -_.- _ - , -_
��erry Stratlu�an asked for the basis of #he appeal _R. .Donald,Hawkinson responded the garage
door was closed before ihe-cleanup crew,arrived, ffie-crew wrongfully opened the gazage door,
and they did not have a seazch warrant.
Richazd Weiner and Teny D Rourke, �uho,both zvorked on the cleanup of this srte, appeazed.
Gerry Strathman asked was the gazage door open when they azrived. Mr. O'Rourke respondad
the door was open_about 2,feet, which was enough for him to see_ inside o£ it.. _--. .
G. Donald Hawkinson stated he has two letters from neighbors indicafing the garage door was
-unlocked. (Mr, Hawkinson presented these letters to Gerry Strathman.) One letter was from
Gene Baum and the other was from I.orraine McEvoy, both of 1901 Juliet Avenue. Mr.
Strathman stated neither letter indicates whether the garage door was open or closed.
Sharon Bougie stated the gazage had been broken into. It had previously be�n nailed closed. 'Tiie
only way to get into the gazage was with a gazage door opener. After the City crew had taken her
belongings out of the garage, they damaged the opener. Ms. Bougie could not enter her gazage.
She had to open another door which had previously been barred closed in order to gain access.
Gerry Strathman stated there aze two issues here: 1) Whether this was a legal or illegal entry into
the properiy, 2) Was the owner properly notified and did the City crew do the cleanup. The
entry issue cannot be resolved here because this hearing is not a judicial setting, As for the other
issue, paperwork indicates no6ces were mailed on several occasions. (Chuck Votel presented
copies of notices that were mailed.)
q�-aqa�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES FROM 10-20-98
Page 2
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal citing notice was given and the cleanup was
done. Mr. Strathman informetlYhe appellants that if they disagreed with his decision, a notice
can be filed with Mr. Strathman by noon of October 22. This notice will be provided to the
councilmembers for considerarion before making their fmal decision on this matter at the
October 28 City Council meeting.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
ff the owner fails to complv svith the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
�astor David Johnson, co-pastor of Unity Baptist Church, appeared �
Chuck Votel reported this building has been vacant since May 6, 1997. The cunent property
owner is the Open Door Baptist Church. The church has not indicated what they intend to do
with the property. Nineteen summary abatement notices have been issued for nuisance
violations. A citation has been issued to the owner for failing to pay the vacant building fee. 'I'he
real estate taYes aze unpaid. Ramsey Counry Ta�cation has placed an estimated market value on
the property of $45,300. The Code Enforcement officers estimated the cost to repair the structure
is $b0,000 to $200,000 depending on the final usage of the building. The cost to demolish is
$9,000 to $10,000.
Pastor David 7ohnson stated their plan is to demolish the building. The owner is Unity Baptist
Church. Uniry Baptist Church is a merged congregation of two former churches named Pazk
Baptist Church and Open Door Baptist Church. The merger occurred in February 1998. The
reason for the difficulty in caring for the building was caused by the transition. The church has
received tentative approval �f a loan to demolish the building. The estimated cost of the
demolition is $25,000. Mr. 7ohnson requested additional time for final approval of the loan and
to demolish the building.
Gerry Strathman asked about the difference betwe�n the church estimate and Code
EnforcemenYs estimate. Chuck Votel responded Code EnforcemenYs estimate is from
demolition contractors, but it does not inciude asbestos removal nor additional garbage removal.
Asbestos removal can be thousands of dollazs, however the difference between the estimates sull
seems high. Pastor David Johnson stated his recollection is that the contractor said the cost for
the asbestos abatement would be $16,000. Mr. Strathman stated if the City has a lower bid, the
church should find out the name of that company,
Gerry Strathman asked how long it will take to get this building demolished. Pastor David
7ohnson responded it is contingent on getting financing. The goal was to have the building
removed before freezing, and that is not faz from now.
Gerry Strathman asked if he grants additional time, can he be assured the property will be kepY
clean. Pastor David 3ohnson responded he cannot promise that. The trash is dumped from other
� ' q ��-
LEGISLATIVE HEAItING MINLJ'I'ES FROM 10-20-98 Page 3
people. The church does not have the zesources nor the people to take care of the dumping. The
church has contracted with the Thomas Dale Block Club, however they have not been efficient.
Gerry Strathman asked is the structure dangerous. Chuck Votel responded it is constanUy open
and orders have to be issued to have it secured, but it is not dangerous.
Gerry Strathman recommended amending the order to remove or repair within 45 days. Pastor
David Johnson stated he has no problem with this recommendation.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue If
the owner faiis to comnlv with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildin¢.
Ying Vang and Pang Vang appeared and stated they purchased the building from Tracy Moos on
September 18, 1998. Ying Vang stated they aze almost done with repairing the building. Two
family members aze ready to move in after the building is reinspected.
Chuck Votel reported that the building is close to being ready for reinspection. The new owners
have obtained a code compliance inspection; they have plumbing and building pernuts. They
still need to get an electrical pertnit, and the furnace needs some work before it can be signed off.
Mr. Votel suggested this matter be laid over for a while.
Xing Vang stated he had the furnace tested by St. Paul Plumbing and Heating Company. Pang
Vang stated they have to finish the bathroom floor and the gutters.
Gerry Strathman recommended laying over to the November 17, 19981egislative hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 a.m.
rrn
�R�Gl�qL
. ����
� h�
, t � �����
�
RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To
�
Council Fi1e #
Green
61622
. Date
WHEREAS, Department of Fire and Safety Services, 7
requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider
ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, �
two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property herema
Property" and commonly known as 667 Charles Avenue. �ii
follows, to wit: �
vis n of Code Enforcement has
h advisability and necessity of
od ftame strncture with a detached,
refened to as the "Subject
property is legally described as
All of I.ot 19, and Lot 20 BXCEPT the EastzO feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate No.
2 Additian /
WHEREAS, based upon the records in e Ramsey County Recorder's Office and
information obtained by Division of Code E orcement on or before June 15, 1498, the following
are the now known interested or responsib parties for the Subject Property: Tracy G. Moos, 256
Prescou Street, St. Pau1, MI�T 55107-30 ; Commercial Federal Mortgage, 4501 Dodge Street 2nd
Floor, Omaha, NE 68132, Attn: T ie Post, Loan #3153000930009900983
WHEREAS, Division of C e Enforcement has served in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Leg" lative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
Building(s)" dated July 13, 199 ; and
WHEREAS, this o�r informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the
structure located on the S ject Properry is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
WHEREAS, s order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or
demolish the structu located on the Subyect Properiy by August 12, 1998; and
this
i, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring
constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and
[�REAS, trris nuisance conditlon has not been corrected and Division of Code
nt requested that the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the L,egislative Hearing
the City Council and the Saint Paul City Council; and
WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance
the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I,egislative Code, of the tnne, date, place and
�se of the public hearings; and
�R8' - �i9?-
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the I,egislative Hearing Off'icer of the Saint Paul City
Council on Tuesday, October 20, 1998 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving
testimony and evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or
responsible parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to tY�e public peace, health,
safery and welfaze and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this
structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alte tive by
demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with all applicable cod s and ordinances.
TY�e rehabilitation or demolition of the structure to be completed within fi n(15) days after the
date of the Council Hearing; and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul Ciry Co ncil on Wednesday, October
28, 1998 and the testimony and evidence including the action take y the Lzgislative Hearing
Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore
BE IT RFSOLVED, that based upon the testimony evidence presented at the above
referenced public hearings, the Sa3nt Paul City Council he y adopts the following Findings and
Order concerning the Subject Property at 667 Charles enue:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
That the Subject Property comprises
L,egislative Code, Chapier 45.
That the costs of demolition az
three thousand dollars ($3,000
condition as defined in Saint Paul
of this buiiding(s) is estunated to exceed
That there now exists and s existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at
the Subject Property.
That an Order to Aba Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible
parties to correct th deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
That the
That I
which
That
causing this nuisance wndition have not been conected.
f Code Enforcement has posted a placard on the Subject Property
it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition.
building has been routinely monitored by the Depamnent of Fire and Safety
Division of Code Enforcement, VacanUNuisance Buildings.
the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this
stion and that the notification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
ORDER
Paul City Council hereby makes the following order:
1. e above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe
and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting
influence on the communiry by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as
prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with
all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the
structure in accordance with ail appiicabie codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or
demolition and removal of the structure must be completed within fifteen (15) days after the
date of the Council Heazing.
ORIGINAL
�
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ar-���-
2. If the above conective action is not compieted within this period of time the Fire and Safety,
Services, Division of Code Enforcement is hereby authorized to take whatever steps are
necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred
against the Sub}ect Property pursuant to rhe provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul
L,egislative Code. _
3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by the City of Sa' Paui, all
personal properry or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolit3 and removal
shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the en of this time period.
If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be ab doned and the City
of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provide y law.
4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resoluuon be mailed to e owners and interested
parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of ffie Saint Paul L,eg' ative Code.
lT'�
�a.'
�� \��
l�\�
Navs
Requested by Department of:
F' e� Enfo �Cement Division
By• _
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by C u
By:
Approved by Mayor• Date
1 Secretary
Form Approved by City Attorney
BY � �4 � `��.� � .Lrn
Approved �y Mayor for
to
By:
a�-q��-
Division of Code Enforcement
DATE INRUITED
a9nsr9a I GREEN SHEET
No
slsz2
292-7�18
October 28, 1998 Public Heaxing
TOTAL#aFSIGNATURE
�.µ,.��,�
�
NUMfl9tFOR �4IYAiTOlIEY OIYCLFRK
eounx�
onoEx ❑AUxcu�amucFSOn wuxeYU.o
� WYORf 4fafT41T� ❑
:S (CLlP LOCATtONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Ciry Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the referenced
building(s). If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Department o£ Fire and Safety Services,
Division of Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at
667 Charles Avenue.
PLANN WG COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CMI. SERVICE COMMISSION
Has this Pe���n eNer wurked utMer a contract forthis tlePa�ertt?
vES n�o ,
Flasthia pneonlfiim ever 6een a cily empbyae?
YES NO
Dcea this personifirtn possese a sidll not normallypossessed by any curtent cily empbyee?
YES t�
IsMU p�vsonlfirm a tarpeted vendo/t .
YES NO
This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in Chapter 45 and a vacant building as defined in
Chapter 43 of the Saint Pau1 Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties Irnoum
to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue by
August 12, 1998, and have failed to cornply with those orders.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVEO �
.��'''zs-.Kt";. "��� ,-i
�"r��e�aa � ��
REC�:l�E4�
The City will eliminate a nuisance.
OCT 1� 1998 ��� u � 3 �� g
The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the
property, collected as a special assessment against the properiy tases.
A nuisance condifion wili remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight fhe
community.
> - ,
OTALAMOUNTOFSRANSACTfONt COETIREVQiUEBUD6EfED(qACLEOti� YES NO
Nuisance Housing Abatement 2b1
UNDIN6SOURCE ACTNIT'NUMBER
INFORMATION (EXPWN)
�i�'t�t'��. s�, ��t"=.�?F
OCT � P� ����
. , . , � � ' , ' ' , , , � I , I � I , I
. ., � � , , � � � � � , , � , , , � , ' , ' ' �'l
' . ' ����G 0��: I , . , ' , ' , - ,
, , '„ ' - ' „ � , , , , ,� � , , � , i � � � ,
��
.
„
,
BEIOW'ffiCCOIZCCY ���� 'SLYll108CfC OY . , , ,
' , , , IWIGI7gS �}lC , , , , QQI]�tt�(�,4 �OCl�CdfS � � , � �
�
,� , , , , , , , . . � ,
, � , , , i , �I ,
,
� � �
.
, . . , , , � , , , ,
' CONTRACTS(ass�essutfiorizedbudgeYeiri.sts} COU2�TCII,RESOLUITON(amendtitidget4/acce�t'grauts)�
, � � 1'. Oirtside Agency � � � � , � � 1. 17epsctmentS�9tecctor ' � , � ' � � � �� � � � � �
� � Z.' ,DeP,mimentDit�ctor � � �� � 2. Officeof$inancialSavicesDuetjor � � � � �-
- 3: CityAttaaey 9 City'AttomeY' , .
� � � �, MayodAssistmt�foicontractsoven$Z5,000)' 4 Ivi�/�sts�'� � �� �
� � s � I�nx;�s (r«contiactsover�aso,000j , s. cilg�cwmcii` ,� , � ���� �� � � � � � '� �; ��,� �
6.' Office ofFinancial Seivicas - Accouatin8 6 Office o�Finmcisl Ser,d�ces , A�oumrin8,
nnn�rusrx�� oxDIIZS �s�tx���) caurrcu.�sat�;czor� f�t� �t o�a,��>'
y 1. nctrv�tyManagcrorl�epa�ncAc�mtanc � 1 Depachnentnue�wr � �� � �
2.' De�mtmeofiD�rector", . 2 Cri� '
' , , 3: OfficeofFin�ciaiServicesDirector 3. MaporlA.ssisFsnt'
' � � �. �CityClak � ' � � � � � � � �4. CityComcil" ` � r �' , ' �� � � �
� � S. OI&ce ofFinaricial Sckvices - Awotmting � �' � � � � � � �
� Ai�h9AIIS�TRATIVE ORDIItS (alt��s) ER8CUITVE OI2DE[t �, � � �� � � � �
� � 1.�,Depazfm�tDuebtor � � � � � � i. Depac�D�ct�, ' ' � , � J , �
�
, 2: CitpAVaney� � � � � �' ' � 2. City,� ` „ `� �
� " � 3. OEce�,qfFSnancial§ervice§,Director ', 3�.'-]vtay�le e�;i
� ' C�S Cletk 4, C'rtp'Clak
,� r � i � , � � � � �� �
TOTALNGANBEROFSIGNAT(JREPAGES ��„ ����,� � � � � � � �� � � �
' 7ndicate tUe # of pages om.which signatutes mc trqssired anci papemlip or flag each of Wese pages
� � QCT[ONREQUESTED �� � � � � � , � ' � � � �� ,
Descnbe,wlietfheprojxf/cequestseeksto�comRlishineithercLcnnologicalo�slerorocderofim�wrYanee whiclu�vecLS ,
mostappm�piiete'f�Sl�issae. Donotwritecampl�esente�ces. Begin'earhifem;inyoittLst�witfi'averb. ', '
�
� , � � ��,� � ' , _
„ ., ,�
. �o���
°c���e��e����r��a,��s�r�lioar��.� � � � �
' � � �'ERSONAL SE12�IGE CONERACTS: � � �� � � � � � � � � � � �
, „
`Tlris iofomnati� will bensedto detee�ine tfie city's habilrtyfa compensation clazms. tazies andpmper civ�I
' , , secvice Birmg x�es. , � � , '
„ �
�� IId1TIATIL�IG�'ROBLIIy1, ISSUE, OPPOItTUNiTY � � �� � � � � � ° � ' �
Eiiplsiull� situalion or �kions thet caeBYed a need foryoia pco�ect or teqUest ' �
�
� . � ��
� � � � � „ �
,
.
ADVANfAGES7FAPPRONID , � ,
Tndicate wlu,� rUis is simrly an,�mtal b�g�n=�,�i� �Y�i� � wheiher rfieie etz sp�ifie wsys m,
" , wluchibeCityofSamtP�ulandif§citiienswill6enefit;fiomfhSspmjecf/echon. , � '
� � � � � � � �
� �� �
: y ,
� � � DLSAD�ADFF�IG�S IF APPROVED� � � , � �� ' � � � �
Wfiat�galive eEects or me,jor cke�, to c�asEinB � P��P� �8� � P�J��4�tP�o�ace rf rt isgassed ,
(e,g.,�cdefays,�ise,teicimaeases�'asses�enis)7 To �wliom? Wheu7Forfiovrl"ong? . ''
� �
„ � DISADV� � PA(�S4�NOTAR�RO�oED, � �" �� �
� . „� � , � � � rate� xevenue7 � ��� � � � � � � � � �
r
What wrll betLe v ifthe prp�sed ad�on is noY u ?,Tnab�lityto dekvei secnce? -Ca�mte
htgk tr�o no�se accident —
� FINANCIAL,,3MPAC1' , � � � . �� � , � � � � �
ttlthousli �cxt'mnsc ta�lor ffie i�«mafiori you pmyiae ]na� w rhe�e ybu ��d�n�, m�erat xwx masr answer
4uro',qaestions: Hovamuch is it going to' cwst`! ' Who.is going,to, payt? , '
� �
� � � � � ��� ��
'
,
� � . � � � „ �� „' � �� � �
„
, „
� ��� .r
, � � �
�
� �
, � �
�� � ,
�
, , �u .� � ,' .f..�a....,. !!. wuu . . ., u. . f Iti..,.:A,d .u��i�utL�.n���o-„I��JwI.� , f�� a�,� �, ,�.,� �b iJ �w;lti�i1�'ra§e1� r�i�� I �,�%",��.�
("a g - a1`1 �
,
MINLTTES OF TI� LEGISLATNE HEARING
Tuesday, November 17, 1998
Room 330, City Hall
Gerry Strathman, I.egislative Hearing Officer
STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel and Guy Willits, Code Enforcement
Gerry Strathman called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m.
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 328 Le�npton Parkway North.
Mohammed Shahidullah, owner, appeazed and stated he received a letter to cut the grass. When
Mr. Shahidullah went to the property, he found there was no grass except for some tall weeds in
vazious spots. Gerry Strathman asked could these weeds be cut down. Mr. Shahidullah
responded there is nothing to cut; he just pulled them out.
Chuck Votel reported the gzass was probably sparse, howevez Code Enforcement received
complaints about it. Mohammed Shahidullah responded someone complained in a false manner
and he got blamed. Mr. Shahidullah feels he does not have good communication skilis. When
he explains his position, he makes enemies.
Gerry Strathman stated if there are any weeds over 8 inches tall, Mohatnlned Shahidullah should
get rid of them. Mr. Shahidullah stated there is nothing there to cut and he is afraid the City wili
send him a bill for $400, Mr. Strathman asked Guy Willits would he be willing to go with Mr.
Shahidullah to look at the property. Mr. Willits agreed.
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal, however, Guy Willits will meet with
Mohammed Shahidullab today at 11:00 a.m. at the property. At that time, Mr. Shahidullah will
be told what needs to be cut.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or reuair the building at 907 Margaret Street
(rear housel. If the owner fails to comply with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the buildin�.
Chuck Votel reported this property is owned by Giulio and Mary Casci. There is storm damage,
but the property was in bad shape before the storm. The owners have signed a registration form
for the vacant buildings program acknowledging that they would like to have the City remove the
building. Removing the building will result in an assessment of over $10,000. There is a party
on record who has a banki�uptcy interest in the property. This resolution would order the owner
to remove or repair the property in five days.
Gerry Strathman recommended approval.
�����'
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINU'I'ES OF 11-17-98
Summarv Abatement Order appeal for 681 Vir2inia Street
Page 2
Chuck Votel reported the inspector Hazold Robinson issued an order to secure the garage door.
Since then, Mr. Robinson has spoken to the appellant and gave her an extension of time to
complete the work. The work is now done. This summary abatement order has been withdrawn.
(Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildine. (Laid over from 10-20-98)
Guy Willits reported the building is now up to code. This resolution has been withdrawn by
Code Enforcement.
(Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.)
�
�� J���
REPORT
i��Ct'JGy4 V Y\�/�7:1�7i�.�1►Ci1
Date: November 17,1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevard
Geiry Strathman
Legislative Hearing Officer
Summary Abatement Order appeal for 328 Lexineton Parkway North.
Legislative Heazing Officer recommended denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the bullding at 907 Mar¢aret Street
{rear house). If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommended apptoval.
3. Summary Abatement drder appeal for 681 Vir�nia Street.
Summary Abatement Order withdrawn by Code Enforcement This matter is closed.
4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the building at 667 Chazles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
(Laid over from 10-20-98)
Resolution withdrawn by Code Enforcement. This matter is closed.
DEPARTMENI' OF F7RE A,�ID SAFETY SERVICES
T+molhy K Fulle�. Fire Chiej ��
DIVIS[ON OF PROPERTY CODE E�IFORCE[.�"NT
Charles Yote� Program Director �
CITY OF SAIN'f PALJL Nuisance Buitding Code Ersforcement
h'orm Coleman, iLfayor SSS Cedor Street T¢b 6i1-298-4153
S¢int Paul, hLY S�IOi-1?60 Fai: b51-??8-3150
i
September 25, 1998
G6U�1C:� � �.'�,�^
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS �`
Council President and
Members of the City Council
t' � �:;
Department of Fire and Safery Services, VacanUNuisance Buildings Enforcement Division
has requested the City Council schedule public hearings to consider a resolution ordering the
repair or removal of the nuisance buildin�(s) located at:
667 Charles Avenue
The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows:
Legisiative Hearing - Tuesday, October 20, 1998
City Councii Aearing - Wednesday, October 28, I998
The owners and responsible parties of record are:
Name and I,ast Known Address
Tracy G. Moos
256 Prescott Street
St. Paui, MN 55107-3036
Interest
Fee Owner
Commercial Federal Mortga;e
4501 Aodge Street 2nd Floor
Omaha, NE 68132
Attn: Tammie Post
Loan #3�53000930009900983
The legal desciiption of this property is:
Fee Owner
All of Lot 19, and Lot 20 EXCEPT the East 20 feet thereof, Block 1, Syndicate
No. 2 Addition.
667 Charles Avenue
September 25, 1998
Page 2
��.�q
Division of Code Enforcement has declared this buildin�(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as
defined by I.egisiative Code, Chapter 45. Division of Code Enforcement has issued an order
to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the
deficiencies or by razing and removing this building{s).
Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition zemains
unabated, the community continues to suffer the blightin� influence of this property. It is the
recommendation of the Division of Code Enforcement that the City Council pass a resolution
orderin� the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a
timely manner, and failing that, authorize the Division of Code Enforcement to proceed to
demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special
assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes.
Si C ely,
�� L
i I , ' i ��� 3 1�,
� ��af
Rene Weiss
Vacant Buildings Supervisor
Division of Code Enforcement
Department of Fire and Safety Services
RW:ml
cc: Frank Berg, Building Inspection and Design
Rachel Young, City Attorneys Office
Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council
Steve Zaccard, Fire Marshall
Paul Mordorski, PED-Housing Division
01-98
�I �''��
REPORT
Date: October 20, 1998
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
LEGISLATIVE HEARING
Gerry Strathman
L.egislative Hearing Off'icer
1. Summary Abatement Appeal for 1904 Jefferson Avenue.
(Laid over from 10-6-98)
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
2. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
If the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enfarcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L,egislative Hearing Officer recommends amending the order to remove or repair within
45 days.
3. Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue. If
the owner fails to comply with the order, Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
L.egislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the November 17, 1998
legislative hearing.
� � r 1 � �
, -NII1#TiT�S QF �'I3EL£sGIS�3`IVE FIEARING
__ :Il' .�a 3'YT ��_. _'.J - -
Tuesday, October 20, 1998 � --
��,�_ _. ..__., _, ..-.,_ ._..=z - -. �,-:., _::= Room.�O,;Cit1'_�:° -- - , se c,; .. : t:. - — :;:t
_ �- _ = - - _ -,__ _. :..
�taff Present: Terry D.'Rourkg,.Parks �nd Izecreation; Chuck Votel, Go�e Eaforcement; Richard
�'�er,-�arks and �eczeation; �uy_ Willits,.-�ade Enforc_ement-_ ._ -, ,_.._
= Gerry Siratt�man called.the meeting Yo vrde,r at 10:00 am. _ _ = _ _- _- _ - -
_ ��- - - - - -
. _ . _ _,,._ _
• -
; ,z - - - -
Summarv Abatement Apueal for �1904 7efferson Avenue. (Laid over from 10-6-98)
�:� ;:�:���.
Gerry Strathman stated this item was laid over because there were a number of differences as to
�uhat }�appene�: :�ere was �ot_anyone. from tk�e x�az�� �re�;pteseuX at meeting .nor
�v_asfihe�e av�deotape availabje. C�it�ck 3?oiel-resgonded �ere is av�depta�e aaw and
�f the c�eau�p crew aze �ere as-�e11. _, ___ - _ `
�rl.vide,atape was shoEVn.of�l�e�crge?tY befQrethe.�leanug_ansia�teFurards.). _.. -_.- _ - , -_
��erry Stratlu�an asked for the basis of #he appeal _R. .Donald,Hawkinson responded the garage
door was closed before ihe-cleanup crew,arrived, ffie-crew wrongfully opened the gazage door,
and they did not have a seazch warrant.
Richazd Weiner and Teny D Rourke, �uho,both zvorked on the cleanup of this srte, appeazed.
Gerry Strathman asked was the gazage door open when they azrived. Mr. O'Rourke respondad
the door was open_about 2,feet, which was enough for him to see_ inside o£ it.. _--. .
G. Donald Hawkinson stated he has two letters from neighbors indicafing the garage door was
-unlocked. (Mr, Hawkinson presented these letters to Gerry Strathman.) One letter was from
Gene Baum and the other was from I.orraine McEvoy, both of 1901 Juliet Avenue. Mr.
Strathman stated neither letter indicates whether the garage door was open or closed.
Sharon Bougie stated the gazage had been broken into. It had previously be�n nailed closed. 'Tiie
only way to get into the gazage was with a gazage door opener. After the City crew had taken her
belongings out of the garage, they damaged the opener. Ms. Bougie could not enter her gazage.
She had to open another door which had previously been barred closed in order to gain access.
Gerry Strathman stated there aze two issues here: 1) Whether this was a legal or illegal entry into
the properiy, 2) Was the owner properly notified and did the City crew do the cleanup. The
entry issue cannot be resolved here because this hearing is not a judicial setting, As for the other
issue, paperwork indicates no6ces were mailed on several occasions. (Chuck Votel presented
copies of notices that were mailed.)
q�-aqa�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUT'ES FROM 10-20-98
Page 2
Gerry Strathman recommended denying the appeal citing notice was given and the cleanup was
done. Mr. Strathman informetlYhe appellants that if they disagreed with his decision, a notice
can be filed with Mr. Strathman by noon of October 22. This notice will be provided to the
councilmembers for considerarion before making their fmal decision on this matter at the
October 28 City Council meeting.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 932 Concordia Avenue.
ff the owner fails to complv svith the order. Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
building.
�astor David Johnson, co-pastor of Unity Baptist Church, appeared �
Chuck Votel reported this building has been vacant since May 6, 1997. The cunent property
owner is the Open Door Baptist Church. The church has not indicated what they intend to do
with the property. Nineteen summary abatement notices have been issued for nuisance
violations. A citation has been issued to the owner for failing to pay the vacant building fee. 'I'he
real estate taYes aze unpaid. Ramsey Counry Ta�cation has placed an estimated market value on
the property of $45,300. The Code Enforcement officers estimated the cost to repair the structure
is $b0,000 to $200,000 depending on the final usage of the building. The cost to demolish is
$9,000 to $10,000.
Pastor David 7ohnson stated their plan is to demolish the building. The owner is Unity Baptist
Church. Uniry Baptist Church is a merged congregation of two former churches named Pazk
Baptist Church and Open Door Baptist Church. The merger occurred in February 1998. The
reason for the difficulty in caring for the building was caused by the transition. The church has
received tentative approval �f a loan to demolish the building. The estimated cost of the
demolition is $25,000. Mr. 7ohnson requested additional time for final approval of the loan and
to demolish the building.
Gerry Strathman asked about the difference betwe�n the church estimate and Code
EnforcemenYs estimate. Chuck Votel responded Code EnforcemenYs estimate is from
demolition contractors, but it does not inciude asbestos removal nor additional garbage removal.
Asbestos removal can be thousands of dollazs, however the difference between the estimates sull
seems high. Pastor David Johnson stated his recollection is that the contractor said the cost for
the asbestos abatement would be $16,000. Mr. Strathman stated if the City has a lower bid, the
church should find out the name of that company,
Gerry Strathman asked how long it will take to get this building demolished. Pastor David
7ohnson responded it is contingent on getting financing. The goal was to have the building
removed before freezing, and that is not faz from now.
Gerry Strathman asked if he grants additional time, can he be assured the property will be kepY
clean. Pastor David 3ohnson responded he cannot promise that. The trash is dumped from other
� ' q ��-
LEGISLATIVE HEAItING MINLJ'I'ES FROM 10-20-98 Page 3
people. The church does not have the zesources nor the people to take care of the dumping. The
church has contracted with the Thomas Dale Block Club, however they have not been efficient.
Gerry Strathman asked is the structure dangerous. Chuck Votel responded it is constanUy open
and orders have to be issued to have it secured, but it is not dangerous.
Gerry Strathman recommended amending the order to remove or repair within 45 days. Pastor
David Johnson stated he has no problem with this recommendation.
Resolution ordering the owner to repair or remove the building at 667 Charles Avenue If
the owner faiis to comnlv with the order Code Enforcement is ordered to remove the
buildin¢.
Ying Vang and Pang Vang appeared and stated they purchased the building from Tracy Moos on
September 18, 1998. Ying Vang stated they aze almost done with repairing the building. Two
family members aze ready to move in after the building is reinspected.
Chuck Votel reported that the building is close to being ready for reinspection. The new owners
have obtained a code compliance inspection; they have plumbing and building pernuts. They
still need to get an electrical pertnit, and the furnace needs some work before it can be signed off.
Mr. Votel suggested this matter be laid over for a while.
Xing Vang stated he had the furnace tested by St. Paul Plumbing and Heating Company. Pang
Vang stated they have to finish the bathroom floor and the gutters.
Gerry Strathman recommended laying over to the November 17, 19981egislative hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 a.m.
rrn