90-2063 ��I G I N A� � . Counc i l F i t e # �- ��0.3
. �
" Green Sheet # -
RESOLU ION e�,��� �'�
CI OF SAI L, NESO �
�
Presented By
Referred To i Camii ttee: Date
______________________�__________________________________________________________________
Whereas, Th� Cou�cil of the City of Saint Paul had set aside the sum of $260,000 of Capital
Improvement Bond funds for a video camera system for the Saint Paul skyway system; and
Whereas, These funds must be e�ended by March 1, 1991 and the Council wants to establish
the program and procedures for the expenditure of such funds; now therefore be it
Resolved, That the Council does hereby establish the following video camera grant program
for the downtown skyway system to provide funds to owners of those buildings that contain an
element of the skyway system:
AvvliCations
Applications for cameras and monitors shall be submitted on forms provided by the
Department of Planning and Economic Development. Generally the information .required
shall consist of the following:
-number of cameras requested
-number of cameras currently in place
-site plan showing existing cameras and requested cameras
-area of skyway in building
-area of skyway to be monitored
-number of monitors requested
-placement of monitors
-staffing plan for monitor location
-maintenance plan for video system
-general installation plan
-land uses in building
-hours of operation of building
Installation Criteria
The installation of the cameras shall be the responsibility of the building owner and shall
meet the following criteria:
A. All persons seeking interface of their seclirity system with the skyway security system
must submit technical data for their system for review by the Skyway Governance
Committee.
B. All costs for connection and interface with the skyway security system shall be borne by
the owner of the private system seeking such interface and control
r-. = 7,
� � � � � ��-i �.. � �y.����a�3
- . C. � The priva�e system owner shall provide video output at one volt peak-to-peak, NTSC.
% All applicable engineering standards in force at the time of installation shall apply and
compliance shall be required.
D. The private system owner shall be responsible to determine, prior to installation, that
system compatibility e�usts and that no separate or additional control devices are
required at the control point.
E. The e�ustence of an on-going operational plan.
Review Procedure .��$���y�� �� 1941
Proposals must be�ceived by the Department of Planning and Economic Development no
later than i�--a� 'O°n. All proposals shall be reviewed and prioritized by the Skyway
�
Governance Committee. Cameras proposed for location at those sites identified by the
Department of Planning and Economic Development as having the greatest need for
surveillance shall receive the highest priority. Cameras proposed to replace existing, older
cameras will receive low priority, as the replacement of existing systems would not result in an
increase in the area of skyway being observed. Criteria for prioritization shall include, but not
be limited to, the following:
-cost effectiveness of public investment
-estimated improvement to security levels of skyway
-coordination with other security measures
-incident statistics for proposed locations
___________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________�_-______-_________
Yeas Na s Absent Requested by Department of:
Dimon "�„
Goswitz
Lon
Maccabee
Rettman
Thune
Wilson BY�
________________��__=_—_=____—_________
Adopted by Council: Date DEC 2 U 1990 Form A oved by City Attorney
Adoption , Certified by Council Secretary BY:
i`
By° � Ap rov by Mayor for Submission to
� � �. ����
Approved Mayor: Date �'�?� : Cou ci
By:
r0%� BY'
PU�t������ ��.'�.L� � �� 1990_
` � , . ���14���°.3
. �.. ..;.'.
��
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
/,
INTERDEPARTMENTAI MEMORAN�UM
MEMORANDIIM
DATE: Sep�tember 13 , 1990
TO: Council President Bill Wilson
Members of the City Council
FROM: Mark Filipi �2�
RE: Procedures for Accessing CIB Funds for Skyway Security
System
In 1988, $260, 000 was allocated for a video camera system for the
Saint Paul Skyway system. This system was to consist of 27
cameras and 31 monitors. The funding sources were equally
distributed between Ca ital Improvement Bonds and the Downtown Tax
Increment Financing Dist� �� -��,,,�
J- f (�c-' Co t7�
z�b� ' / 1 c'�:.��c t�,.'��;�_--�
��' Because of the nature of the funding sources, only capital
�'•°`' improvements �may be funded. The funds must be expended before
M�ch 1, 1991 The improvements may consist of only video cameras
and monitors, as per the original project description. If it
should become desirable to expend the funds on capital
improvements other than the video cameras and monitors, the CIB
Committee would have to approve an amendment to the project
description.
The implementation of the system �Tould then follow the typical
process of issuing a Request for Proposals and bidding out the
project. The Budget Office has indicated that they feel that
insufficient time remains to allow the use of the funds as a
source for the installation of cameras by individual building
owners. An alternative they have suggested would be for the City
to utilize the allocated funds to acquire the cameras, with the
individual buildings then applying for the cameras ,and installing
the units.
In the eveMt this alternative is selected, the security censultant
has sugges�ed certain criteria be implemented to ensure the
installation of a coordinated system:
l. Al1 persons seeking interface of their security system with the
Skyway 5ecurity System must submit technical data for their
{ system for review by the Skyway Governance Committee.
2 . All costs for connection and interface with the Skyway Security
System 5ha11 be borne by the owner of the private system
seeking such interface and control.
. _ � ���o a���
:OO:
CITY Of SAIN7 P11UL
INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 26, 1990
TO: Counci;l President Bill Wilson
M�mbers of the City Council
FROM: Mark F'ilipi � ,�
RE: Video iCamera Grant Program
Requests for security video cameras to be placed in the Saint Paul
Skyway System are requested from owners of those buildings that
contain an element of the Downtown Skyway System.
Anplications
Applications �or cameras and monitors shall be submitted on forms
provided by the Saint Paul department of Planning and Economic
Development. Generally, the information required is as follows:
- Numbe,r of cameras requested
- Number of cameras currently in place
- Site plan showing existing cameras and requested cameras
- Area of skyway in building
- Area of skyway to be monitored
- Number of monitors requested
- Placement of monitors
- Staffing plan for monitor location
- Maintenance plan for video system
- General installation plan
- Land uses in building
- Hours of operation of building
Installation Criteria
The installation of the cameras shall be the responsibility of the
building owner and shall meet the following criteria:
A. All pe�sons seeking interface of their security system with
the Sk�rway Security System must submit technical data for
their system for review by the Skyway Governance Committee.
B. All costs for connection and interface with the Skyway
Security System shall be borne by the owner of the private
system seeking such interface and control.
�
Council President Bill Wilson
Members of the City Council �
September 26, 1990
Page Two
C. The private system owner shall provide video output at one (1)
volt peak-to-peak, NTSC. All applicable engineering standards
in force at the time of installation shall apply and
compliance shall be required.
D. The private system owner shall be responsible to determine,
prior to installation, that system compatibility exists and
that no separate or additional control devices are required at
the control point.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Proposals must be received by the Department of Planning and
Economic Development no later than November 15, 1990. All
proposals shall be reviewed and prioritized by the Skyway
Governance Committee. Cameras proposed for location at those
sites identified by PED as having the greatest need for
surveillance shall receive the highest priority. Cameras proposed
to replace existing, older cameras will receive low priority, as
the replacement of existing systems would not result in an
increase in the area of skyway being observed. Criteria for
prioritization shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
- Cost effectiveness of public investment
- Estimated improvement to security levels of skyway
- Coordination with other security measures
- Incident statistics for proposed locations.
NMF/bp
� nmf/11/camera.rfp
- � , � . � _ . , � ��.�
� �o
Members of the City Council
September 13 , 1990
Page Two.
3 . The private system owner shall provide video output at one (1)
volt peak-tp-peak, NTSC. All applicable engineering standards
in forc� at the time of installation shall apply and compliance
shall b� required.
4 . The private system owner shall be responsible to deternine,
prior to installation, that system compatibility exists and
that no separate or additional control devices are required at
the control point.
11/nmf/procedur
i
� � .� . ������..3
DEpART1�ENT/OFFIQFJCOUNqL ' OATE INIT44TED
GREEN SHEET No. 5 3 6 2
CONTACT PER80N 3 PHONE �NmAU DATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRECT�t �GTY COUNqL
Janice Rettman ( 98-5 89) �� �CITY ATTORNEY �CITY CLERK
MUBT BE ON COUNqL AOENDA BY T� ROU71N0 �BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MQT.BERVICE3 DIR.
�MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN7] �
TOTAL�OF SIGNATURE P QES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACT10N RE�UESTED:
Reso utio
REOOMMENDATION8:Approve(p a (F� COUNCIL CO�AITTEElRESEARCH REPORT OPTIONAL
ANALY8T PHONE NO.
_PLANNINO OOMMISSION pVIL RVICE COMMISSION
_CIB COMMITTEE
COMMENTS:
_BTAFF
_DISTRICT COURT
SUPPORTS WHICFI COUNqL OBJE ?
INITL4TIN0 PROBLEM,ISSUE,OP NITY ,Whet,When,Whsro,Wh»:
(see ttac ed)
ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
DIBADVANTA(iE8 IF APPROVED:
DI8ADVANTAQE3 IF NOT APPROVE
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSAC ON COST/REVENUE BUDQETED(qRCLE ON� YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUM�R
FINAN(��AL INFORMATION:(EXPI.AI