The URL can be used to link to this page

90-1459 i � • ' y�C�c�.v2`(i Council File # q�''j'—��'� .:�,.• G��/',�`'�, �v / ' 'l sJ Green Sheet # RESOLUTION 4 ITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � '��' � ,� ` , - (�,��" Presented By - / Referred To Committee: Date O WHEREAS,Since 1986,the ssessment rate for street paving including curb and gutter, in connection with the Combined Sewer Separation Program (CSSP)has been$19.00 per assessable foot;and WHEREAS,Since 1985,the assessment rate for storm sewer in connection with CSSP has been 3 cents per square foot for 1 and 2 family dwellings,and 7.5 cents per quare foot for all other types of property;and WHEREAS, In 1989,the ass ssment rate for the mod'rfied lantern style lighting was established at$3.50 per assessable foot,and the alternative bent straw lightin was established at$2.20 per assessable foot;and WHEREAS, It is anticipated�uture construction costs will increase similar to the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index, and the assessment rate should tpe increased acxordingly;and WHEREAS,The most recen Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 4.3%from the first half of 1989 (120.3)to the first half of 19 (125.5);now,therefore be it RESOLVED, In order for the assessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the property owners,the assessment rate for street paving in conn tion with the CSSP program is increased 4.3%from $19.00 per assessable foot to$19.82 per assessable foot for all such CSSP proje s approved by Final Order after October 1, 1990 to be constructed in 1991;and,be it FURTHER RESOLVED,Th assessment rate for storm sewer separation is increased 4.3%from 3 cents per square foot to 3.13 cents per square foot for all 1 and 2 fa ily properties and from 7.5 cents per square foot to 7.82 cents per square foot for all other types of properties for such projects approved b Final Order after October 1, 1990 to be constructed in 1991;and, be it FURTHER RESOLVED,Th assessment rate for the"modified lantern style lighting"or the alternative"bent straw"lighting remain at$3.50 and$2.20 per assessable f t respectively for projects approved at that rate and constructed in 1991;and,be it FINALLY RESOLVED,The ssessment rates for storm sewer separation,street paving, and lighting for 1992 and subsequent years be adjusted each year based u on the MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL SEMI-ANNUAL CONSUMER PRICE INDEX-URBAN, after the first half figures are published (usuall in August). For example,the 1992 rates will be changed based upon the%change from the first half of 1990 to the first half of 1991. �and submitted to Council for review and approval. i Requested by Department of: Y as Nays Absent imon �� . �ga�ea�e e otr�,�n Thrmc Wilson �. By� � Adopted by Council: Date N�V 1 1990 Form Approved by City Attorney Adoptio ified b Council Secretary By� � Approved by Mayor for Submission to By' Council Approved y Mayor• ate� N�V 2 1990 By: Cnw/�� By� �1BlISHE�Q �d 0 v 1 � 1990_ . . . . . , �—C'fp—/��'� .� _ _ _ •.�, . -- DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N� _10 7 9 3 Finance/Real Estate Division g-�3 � GREEN SHEET CONTACF PERSON&PHON INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Pete �lltE.' 2 8-5317 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY(DATE NUMBER FOR ❑BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MGT.SERVICES DIR. ROUTINO ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAG (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Increase t e assessment rate for street paving, curve, and gutter, etc. for CSSP p ojects from $19 per assessable foot to $20 per assessable foot. RECOMMENDATION3:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION3: _ PLANNINO COMMISSION _ IVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under e contract for this department? _CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO A STAFF _ 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? — YES NO _DI3TRICT COURT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explein all yes answsrs on separate sheet and attach to gresn ahsst INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUN (Who,What,When,Where,Why): Since 1986, the a sessment rate for paving streets in connection with.the CSSP program as rema.in d at $19 per assessable foot. �e�;��91� GIB-program shows a 5 pgrcent° increase in the C B assessment funds programmed for the paving portion of the CSSP program. The nec ssitates an increase in the assessment rate from $19 to $20 per assessable foot. ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: The anticipa ed funding needs will be met. If costs do not increase, more money will be avai able to pave additional streets. The total assessments co�,�ected ,.y�.��w._ for street p ving should increase by about $150,000 per year. -� - °� i��_�� ,�,, . , ° : �-. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The assessme t for.,a typical property owner with a 50-foot lot will increase by $50 from $950 to $1,000. RECciVED ��E�VEO !R�C E��EC� � ��31�j0 -,U G 7 1990 AUG 1 1990 �ERK �,E OF THE DIRECTOR 11'� � - DISADVANTAOESIFNOTAPPROVED: •+��Ja�j�ME�VT SERVI�..L• � �, \�y_I__ _ `� ��r� A greater p oportion of the projects will have to be funded by; � other public funds rather than assessments if costs increase.,�� ` �, �L# ` 4 ~ �,�y� Councii Research Center , �,o U�o ��,f �� ,UG 1�1990 �� Tp�Co� � `��0�, ' �'p�cFi,,��.f z �,� � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION N�A COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ON �%1�ES ,_, NO FUNDING SOURCE N ACTIVITY NUMBER N/A FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) � ` 6. � • . • � . � C�y_': .. a -.S� NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.288-4225). � ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor AssistaM 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of thsse pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATtONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body,public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecVrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDQET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the cirys Nability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ ' charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this project/action. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negati�re effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom7 When? For how long? DISADYAEIdTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Aithough you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, fn general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? :�4L��-fJ Council File # qr�—�`7� C1 ��/�'.�"q��"/5rG v _. Green Sheet # RESOLUTION �--�--�--. ITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � � f �resented By Referred To Committee: Date O 'i WHEREAS,Since 1986,the ssessmerrt rate for street paving inciuding curb and gutter,in connection with the Combined Sewer Separation Program (CSSP) as been$19.00 per assessable foot;and WHEREAS,Since 1985,the ssessment rate for storm sewer in connection with CSSP has been 3 cents per square foot for 1 and 2 family dwellings,and 7.5 cents per quare foot for all other types of property;and WHEREAS, In 1989,the ass ssment rate for the mod'rfied lantern style lighting was established at$3.50 per assessable foot,and the alternative bent straw lighting was established at$2.20 per assessable foot;and WHEREAS, ft is anticipated i ture construction costs will increase similar to the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index, and the assessment rate should b increased accordingly;and WHEREAS,The most recent inneapolis-Saint Paul Urban Consumer Price Index showed an increase of 4.3%from the first half of 1989 (120.3)to the first half of 199 (125.5);now,therefore be ft RESOLVED, In order for the ssessment rate to reflect the increased construction costs and benefit to the property owners,the assessment rate for street paving in conn tion with the CSSP program is increased 4.3%from$19.00 per assessable foot to$19.82 per assessable foot for all such CSSP project approved by Final Order after October 1, 1990 to be constructed in 1991;and,be it FURTHER RESOLVED,The ssessment rate for storm sewer separation is increased 4.3%from 3 cents per square foot to 3.13 cents per �square foot for all 1 and 2 fa ily properties and from 7.5 cents per square foot to 7.82 cents per square foot for all other types of properties or such projects approved by Final Order after October 1, 1990 to be constructed in 1991;and,be:d FURTHER RESOLVED,The ssessment rate for the"modffied lantern style lighting"or the alternative"bent straw"lighting remain at$3.50 and$2.20 per assessable foo respectively for projects approved at that rate and constructed in 1991;and,be it FINALLY RESOLVED,The a sessment rates for storm sewer separation,strest paving,and lighting for 1992 and subsequent years be adjusted each year based u n the MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL SEMI-ANNUAL CONSUMER PRICE INDEX-URBAN,after the first half tigures are published(usually n August�For example,the 992 rates will be changed based upon the%change from the first half of 1990 to the first half of 1991. p,,,� S„� ,� (,a,,�„�,�� ''Y,�,�d�' /" " Requested by Department of: Ye s Nays Absent 2mon ��a eea�ee— —Re t tman Th une - F�tilson BY� Adopted by Council• ate Form Approved by City Attorney Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By' �y. Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council Approved by Mayor: D te By: By: �U - /��1� :O• � � . CITY OF SAINT PAUL . INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM ��EiV�� oc�2��0 CITY CLERK TO: Roger Goswitz �°r' Chair, Public Works Committee FROM: Thomas E. Kuhfeld � `��.� � Public Works Department � � . DATE: October 25, 1990 - SUBJECT: CSSP Assessment Rates During discussion in the Public Works Committee regarding Council Files 90-1459 and 90-1460, which proposed increases in the assessment rates for street paving and storm sewer separation, the Committee requested a substitute Resolution which would index the increases to the Consumer Price Index. Attached for your consideration is a Resolution which 1 believe does what the Committee requested. The net affect for 1991 is that the assessments would be somewhat less then what are proposed in the • original Resolutions. For the following years, the assessment rates would be indexed yearly, based upon the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Semi-Annual Consumer Price Index - Urban. I have also attached copies of the two Resolutions which the new Resolution replaces. ' If I can be of further assistance, please call me at 292-6276. ' TEK:smh � i Aitacfiments ' . . .�. �_ 9U _ /��-1 �� / CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM R��EIV�D OCT2519AQ CITY CLERK TO: R ger Goswitz �'� C air, Public Works Committee FROM: T omas E. Kuhfeld �"'"�' �'"� ' P blic Works Department � � DATE: O tober 25, 1990 . SUBJECT: C SP Assessment Rates During discussi n in the Public Works Committee regarding Council Files 90-1459 and 90-1460, w ich proposed increases in the assessment rates for street paving and storm sewer se aration, the Committee requested a substitute Resolution which would index the increa es to the Consumer Price Index. Attached for your consideration is a Resolution whic I believe does what the Committee requested. The net affect for 1991 is that the ssessments would be somewhat less then what are proposed in the original Resoluti ns. For the following years, the assessment rates would be indexed yearly, based u on the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Semi-Annual Consumer Price Index - Urban. I have also atta hed copies of the two Resolutions which the new Resolution replaces. If I can be of furt er assistance, please call me at 292-6276. � TEK:smh Aitachments ✓��.Y'��y" � - /�� C/�J�r� CITY OF SAINT PAUL Members: " �,�+`ctT ��•, OFFICE OF THE CTTY COUNCIL Roger J.Goswitz,chair �; � David Thune,vice chair � ��i�i�l�in � Tom Dimond � ~� o�: o��n,�sso R�CElVED Bob Long �... Committee Report ��'�►�� To: S�int Paui City Council CITY CLERK From: P blic Works, Utilities, and Transportation Committee R ger J. Goswitz, Chair � Hearing Date Action Ap�roval of Minutes of October 3, 1990. APPROVED 3-0 l . 10/30/90 VA ATION: Petition of Louise M. Howe for the APPROVED 3-0 va atiqn of a building encroachment measuring 0. feet to 1.05 feet in Concord Street adjoining Lo s 21 and 22, Auditors Subd. #30. Area lies be ween State and Ada Streets. 2. 10/30/90 VA ATION: Petition of City of Saint Paul to LAID OVER va ate surplus right-of-way along St. Clair INDEFINITELY Av�nue between Ann & Michigan Streets. 3. 10/30/90 FI AL ORDER: Acquiring permanent utility LAID OVER ea ements for the Larpenteur/Jackson Area Storm 4 WEEKS Se er Project. 4. 10/23/90 FI AL ORDER: For constructing the Larpenteur/ LAID OVER Ja kson Area Storm Sewer Project. Bounded by 4 WEEKS La penteur, Soo Line RR, Burlington Northern RR and DNR right-of-way and I-35E. Also, in tallation of sanitary, storm and water se vice connections if requested by property ow ers. 5. 10/23/90 FI AL ORDER: Acquiring a permanent utility APPROVED 3-0 ea ement under and across part of Lot 8, Bl ck 6, Burlington Heights Division No. 2. 6. 10/30/90 FI L ORDER: For constructing the Earl/Conway APPROVED 3-0 Ar a Street Paving and Lighting Project. To in lude parts of Conway, Cypress, Euclid, - E. Fifth, E. Fourth, Gotzian, Pacific, E. Third and Wilson. 7. 10/30/90 FIN L ORDER: For constructing the Earl/Conway APPROVED 3-0 Are Storm Sewer Project. Bounded by Margaret, - Etn , Burns and Arcade. Also, installation of sanitary, storm and water service connections if equested by property owners. 8. . FIR T READING - 90-1731 - An ordinance amending APPROVED 3-0 Cha ter 157.04(9) of the Legislative Code per aining to parking of recreational vehicles. (Re erred to Committee 9/27/90) . �� - �� °�' 9. � RESOLUTION - 90-1711 - Reducing Bush Avenue APPROVED 3-0 paving and lighting assessment for railroad right-of-way through S.W. 1/4 Sec. 29-29-22 owned by Chicago & North Western Transportation Company. (Edgerton/Bush Area Street Paving and Lighting Project) (Referred to Committee 9/25/90) 10. RESOLUTION - 90-1741 - Authorizing transfer of APPROVED 3-0 title of vacated alley in Lots 11 and 12, Saint Paul Proper to First Minnesota Savings Bank. (Referred to Committee 10/2/90) 11 . RESOLUTION - 90-1743 - Reducing the assessment APPROVED 3-0 for property at 1248 E. Cook Avenue from $1,800 to $900 in connection with the Jessamine/Frank Paving and Lighting Project. (Referred to Committee 10/2/90) _ _.....,._.�..,...,.__.....,__ _... . '�12.� � RESOLUTION - 90-1459 - Increasing the assessment • APPROVED AS rate for street paving, curb and gutter for CSSP AMENDED 3-0 , projects from a19.00 per assessable foot to $20.00 per assessable foot. (Laid over in Committee 9/5/90, 9/19/90 and 10/3/90) 13. RESOLUTION - 90-1460 - Increasing the assessment APPROVED AS rates for Storm Sewer Separation Projects from AMENDED 3-0 3 cents per sq. ft. for 1 and 2 family properties and 7.5 cents per sq. ft. for types of property to 3.5 cents and 9 cents respectively. (Laid over in Committee 9/5/90, 9/19/90 and 10/3/90) 14. Discussion on Volume-Based Pricing: Mandatory LAID OVER collection; not organized trash collection. 2 WEEKS �,;,� / � �,�-��G,'"r.� ��`-� �" ��u�� ,y,.�,—«-� , ��Q �� .�� —,�'�c'c�� 9-i�� Please reut�'n co� to: 0 R I�G I i�A L R�al �s�ta�� Divis'on Council File � V��'�� 218 City Hall (PW) (Resolution) Green sheet � /0 7 'r1 3 � RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �� Presented By / ` R`�erred To � Committee: Date d" �2� U 'io1HER�AS , since 1986 , the assessment rate for street paving, includi�ng curb and gutter, in connection with the Combined Sewer Separatio� Program has been $19 per assessable foot; and � ,.._ WHER�AS, ^.,the 1991 Capital Improvement Budget Program, anticipat ng an _,increase in costs , shows a five percent (5�) increase n the C�,pital Improvement Budget assessment funds programme� for the��'��aving portion of the CSSP program; and WHER�AS, in order',to finance this five percent (5%) increase, the asse sment funding `�or street paving in connection with the CSSP Pro ram must be incr�ased to $20 per assessable foot; NOW THEREFORE BE IT �'ti RESO VED, in order to refl" t the need for a five percent (5�) incr ase in assessment fundi and the increased benefit to property wners, the assessment rat for street paving in connectio with the CSSP program is creased from $19 per assessabl foot to $2� per assessable oot for all such street paving pr jects approved by Final Order fter October l, 1990. s Navs Absent Requested by Department of: on sw n Finance & Mana ement ervices � acca ee e ma une g � irector s son 1' Adopted by Council: Date Form Appr � d by City Attorney ,� ^ > Adoption Certified y Council Secretary BY: � �/ `��J--- -� �4 ^ �� By' Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved by Mayor: Date Council � By: i SY� ��