The URL can be used to link to this page

90-1402 d '*� , , ,�.� 1-�: :�, � E n !L � r L �.,,d � ! Y A L Counc i l F i l e # O� 7�'� Green Sheet # a�J RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � -rl' Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Whereas, Commercial State Bank made application to the Planning Commission for a change of non-conforming use for the purpose of operating a catering business pursuant to the provisions of the Saint Paul Zoning Code for property located at 940 Beech Street, legally described as Lots 28 through 30, Block 107, A. Gotzian's Subdivision; and Whereas, T'he Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on April 5, May 3 and May 31, 1990, and submitted its recommendation to the Commission. The Commission, by its Resolution 90-59, decided to approve the application based on the following findings and conclusions: 1. The property was cleaxly designed for and operated as a heavy commercial use. It does not appear that the land and building can be reasonably or econcmically reused for a conforming purpose. 2. The proposed use as a catering facility appears to be "equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district than the previous nonconforming use". 3. if the use and the access thereto is properly regulated, the proposed use would be "consistent with the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community". Whereas, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 64.205, Denise Potting, 923 Beech Street, and Ann Nadeau, 969 Beech Street, duly filed with the City Clerk an appeal from the determination made by the Planning Commission, requesting that a hearing be held before the City Council for the purpose of considering the actions taken by the said Commission; and Whereas, Acting pursuant to Sections 64.205 through 64.208, and upon notice to affected parties a public hearing was duly conducted by the City Council on July 26, 1990 where all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard; and Whereas, The Council, having heard the statements made, and having considered the application, the report of staff, the record, minutes and resolution of the Zoning Committee and of the Planning Commission, does hereby Resolve, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby find and determine that proper notice of the re-hearing conducted by the Planning Commission was not given in the manner provided by law; and be it Further Resolved, that the Council does hereby refer this matter back to the Planning Commission and its Zoning Committee for the purpose of providing the requisite notice to affected property owners, conducting of a re-hearing on the application, and to make a determination whether or not to approve the change of nonconforming use; and be it r , /„1,-�`�iQ r�l�QdZ (�- / !� �': � � � �� ' ��t� lved, That the appeal of Denise Potting, 923 Beech Street, and Ann Nadeau, 969 Beech Street be and is hereby granted; and, be it Finally Resolved, That the City Clerk shall mail a copy of this resolution to Commercial State Bank, Denise Potting, 923 Beech Street, and Ann Nadeau, 969 Beech Street, the Zoning Administrator, Planning Administrator and the Planning Commission. ---------------------------------------- --------------- ------- ------ --------- Yeas Na s Absent Requested by Department of: Dimon Goswttz �+ Lon � �� Maccabee � Rettman Thune v Wilson �+ BY� Adopted by Council• Date Q U G � � 199Q form A ved by City Attorney Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By. BY' Appro by Mayor for Submission to Approved by Mayor: Dp�te AUG 1. 5 1990 Counci L , .�� ' �/ ar: By: �UBItSN' ��u � 5 I y90 G�go��°� DEP NT ^FFl NCIL DATE INITIATEO c�t ci�rk GREEN SHEET No. J2 0 3 CONTACT PER80N 8 PHONE INITIAU DATE INITIAUDATE AZ OZSOIl - �+L31 � ❑DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �cm couNa� NV�� ❑qTY AITORNEY �CITY CLERK MUST BE ON OOUNqI AOENDA BY(DAT� ROUTNIO �BUDQET DIRECTOR �FlN.6 MOT.8ERVICE8 DIR. � �MAYOR(OFi ASSISTANn � TOTAL#�OF SIONATURE PAGES (CLIP AlL LOCATION8 FOR 31GNATURE) ACT�N REfiUES'TED: �Zesolutir.n granting tfie appeal o� Denise Potting and-�nn Nadeau to a decision of the Planr,ing Commis�ion wfiicfi approved a non-con�orming use ermit to establish a caterin busin s. FIEOOMMENDATIOtr3:Approve py a ReJsct(F� COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT OPTIONAL _PLANNIPKi COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ��Y� . eE:C _qB COMMITTEE _ _STAFF _ COMMENT8: _DI8TRICT COURT - SUPPORTS WHICFI COUNqL 08JECTIVE? �NITIATINO PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(Who,VYhat,WMn,Whsro,Wh�: Resolution requested by Council con£irming action take:n at Public HEAP.ING HELD July 26, 1990. ADVANTACiE3 IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVEO: DI9ADVANTAOE3 IF NOT APPROVED: REC�IVED AUG071990 �� R�� !►t� CITY CLERK J�L 9 0,� TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s COST/REVENUE BUDOETED(CIRCLE ON�, YES NO FUNDINO SOURCE ACTMTY NUMBER FlNANqAI INFORMATION:(EXPWI� �\v . . . NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHA31N0 OFFlCE(PHONE NO. 298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are preferred�ings for the flve most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS (assumes authoHzed COUNqL RESOLUTION (Amend, Bdgts./ budget exists) Accept.Grants) � 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Initiating Department 2. Budpet Director 3. City Attorney 3. City Attomey 4. Mayor 4. May�or/Aseistant 5. Flnance&Mgmt Svcs. Director 5. City Council 6. Flnance Aecounting 6. Chief Aceountant, Fln&Mgmt Svcs. ' ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others) Revlsion) and ORDINANCE 1. Activity Manager 1. Initiating DepartmeM Director 2. Department Accountant 2• �Y Ana�Y 3. DepaRment Director 3. MayoNAssistant 4. Budget Director 4. (�ty Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Fln 8 Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (aN others) 1. Initiating Department 2. City Attorney 3. MayodAsaistant 4. City Clerk • TOTAL NUMBER OF SIONATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip each of these Ps9es. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest aeeks to axomplish in elther chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in ycwr list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been pr�ented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIOHBORHOODS, ECONOIiAIC DEVELOPMENT, BUD(3ET, SEWER SEPARATION).(SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL INITIATINO PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget proc�dure required by law/ charter or whether there are speciNc wa in which the CRy of Seint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this pro�ect/action. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to exieting or pnst proceaaes might thfs proJecVrequest produce if it is peseed(e.g.,traffic delays, nase, tax increases or aseessments)?To Whom?When?For how Iong7 DISADVANTA(3ES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative conaequencea if the promised action is not . approved?Inability to deliver aervice?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate? Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? . �� ,. � ��,,,, CITY OF SAINT PAUL �'� :'� 6EPARTMENT �F PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT w � Z; ° " ''' DIVISION OF PLANNING � ��"",itt 'l 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 � utt 111 u C � �� 612-228-3270 4l'�� 1B6' Fax:612-228-3220 JAMES SCHEIBEL MAYOR RECEIVED ,� Juiy Zo, 1990 ��L�231990 '7 CITY CLERK Mr. Albert B. Olson, City Clerk Room 386, City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 RE: Zoning File #10663 - Denise Potting & Ann Nadeau City Council Hearing: , July 26, 1990 PURPOSE: An appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission approving a Change in Nonconforming Use Permit to permit a catering facility located at 940 Beech Street. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: Approve, vote:ll-2-1, June 8, 1990 ZONING COMMITTEE DECISION: Approve, vote: 4-3, May 31, 1990 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve SUPPORT: Three persons spoke in support. OPPOSITION: District 4 recommended denial. petition with 22 names; three persons spoke in opposition. Dear Sir: On May 21, 1990 the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Change in Nonconforming Use Permit. The petitioner testified. At the close of the public hearing, the Committee voted 4 to 3 to approve the Change in Nonconforming Use Permit based on staff findings. On June 8, 1990, the Planning Commission upheld the zoning Committee's recommendation on a 11-2-1 voice vote. This appeal is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on July 26, 1990. Please notify me July 25, 1990 if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing. � Sin rely, .,� � 1� � Y „�� G �_ � ,� �. f Peggy . Reichert Deputy Director for Planning PAR:db Attachments ` �lJ ../�"�%o-C, � { APPLICATION FOR APPEAL � �� I �� ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY CITY OF SAINT PAUL File # ��(D�� JUN 221990 Application Fee $ f�C� � �'� ZON1fVG Tentative Hearing Date ?CC�✓✓ Application is hereby made for an Appeal to the �1�'�l (. D�CSl� under the provisions of Chapter 64, Section , Pa agraph of the Zoning Code to appeal a decision made by the Board of oning Appeals �/Planning Commission on Jun2 � , 19�� _ Zoning Administrator (date of decision) _ Planning Administrator _ Other A. APPELLANT , l��t Name l��n�S� �o{-�j.�� A v�n �� u Daytime phone �y5-d�� Address q23 BE�cH ; �11�`1 f'�Q' c c� Zip Code 55ia C.o B. DECISION BEING APPEALED � Zoning fi le name �U'rnm�r(',ia.( :��. .�C��+� Zoning Fi le # %U�/ ( Property Address/Location �� C/f S��i _ Legal description �vfl 2�--,3� �lc��l� /�'l (otz;an Suhcf;vis�cm C. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Use additional sheets if necessary. ) (Explain why you feel there has been an error in any requirement, permit, decision or refusal made by an administrative official , or an error in fact, procedure or finding made by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Planning Commission. ) �,SlL lL Li�G�C,��C� ��' -- If you have any questions, please contact: U Ap � sign�ant�ure St. Paul Zoning Office � � 1100 City Hall Annex 25 West Fourth Street ��22190 Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102 Date City age t (298-4154) g�82 � � 9� -/�'�� Py.�oN's e�G�� DAYTON'S BLUFFIDISTRICT 4 a COMMUNITY COUNCIL :l.t..�� . '-:�� _' �:�'�� 750 East 7th St., St. Paul, MN 55106 2� . �, J� (612) 772-2075 �UNITY GO June 22, 1990 Mr. Bill Wilson President St. Paul City Council 719 City Hall St. Paul, MN 55102 Dear Mr. Wilson: I 'm writing this letter in support of the zoning appeal that Denise Potting and Ann Nadeau are filing concerning the property at 940 Beech Street. The Dayton' s Bluff Community Council vo�ed to support Denise and An�' s e€forts by assisting them in this appeal process. The residents"�feel fortunate that citizen participation all�ows for this apportuni�y to- appeal. _ The reasons for the appeal are as follows: 1. Communication was not maintained. The ball was dropped on our end by the former CO who was supposed to be working with Commercial State Bank and the residents on finding a suitable reuse of the building. There was no evidence of this file ever existing in our office. 2. The Planning Commission violated its own rules of evidence by taking testimony after the public hearing. The Zoning Committee should have not considered the letter of evidence from Commercial State Bank that led to the Zoning Committee reversing its initial positioli on the matter. 3. The Planning Commission acted contrary to the wishes of the community. Nearly half ofi�� the residents that live in a four block area of 940 Beech have openly expressed the�r opposition to the nonconforming use permit. I am requesting that all evidence submitted to the Zoninq Commission be forwarded to the City Council for further examination. � , c��.-/yo� page two DBD4CC/940 Beech , , If you should have questions, please feel free to contact me at the office. Sue Vannelli and Tom Dimond are aware of the background of this case . and I 'm sure they could be of help too. Sincerely, �-_--� usan Omoto Comm ity Organizer cc: Jim Christianson Vanny :Critton Tom Dimond Robert Hansen Chuck McGuire Gladys Morton Clarence Seidel John Showalter Sue Vannelli Ann Nadeau Denise Potting � � ��--/�� city of saint paul planning commission resolution file number 90-59 � �te June 8, 1990 WHEREAS, Commercial State Bank, file #10611, has applied for a Change in Nonconforming Use Permit under the provisions of §62.102. (e)(5) of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, for the purpose of operating a catering business on property located at 940 Beech Street, legally described as Lots 28-30 Block 107, A. Gotzian's Sub; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission on April 5, 1990, May 3, 1990, and May 31, 1990 held public hearings at which all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said application in accordance with the requirements of §64.300 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its Zoning Committee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings of fact: 1. The property was clearly designed for and operated as a heavy commercial use. It does not appear that the land and building can be reasonably or economically reused for a conforming purpose. 2. The proposed use as a catering facility appears to be " . . .equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district than the previous nonconforming use. . ." . 3. If the use and the access thereto is properly regulated, the proposed use would be " . . .consistent with the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. . ." . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission, that under the authority of the City's Legislative Code, the application for a Change in Nonconforming Use Permit to allow reuse of the existing structure and land as a catering business at 940 Beech Street, is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A site survey and a complete site plan shall be prepared showing the layout of the existing buildings and open areas on the site. 2. The site plan prepared prior to improvement of the property shall be approved using the standard city site plan review process. moved by HIRTE seconded by NEID _ in favor___��_ against- ABSTAINED 1 � � �1d-'l�d� 3. The gravel area at the rear of the buildings shall be properly surfaced for off-street parking; the storage of trucks, trailers, and refuse in this area shall be discontinued. 4. That adequate landscaping and screening shall be provided in and around the parking areas to protect ad�acent residential property. S. That off-street parking spaces for tenants, employees, and commercial vehicles shall be provided and designated. 6. That trash shall be stored inside the building and removed on a regular basis. 7. That commercial trucks delivering supplies, merchandise etc. to the premises shall not exceed 25 trucks per week, no more than six (6) of which shall be semi-trailer trucks, and delivery by such trucks shall be between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 9��/`�� MINUTES OF THE ZONING COAIIvIITTEE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ON MAY 31, 1990 PRESENT: Mmes. Hirte, Morton, Wencl; Messrs. Christenson, Neid, and Vaught_ of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Segal, Assistant City Attorney; Ms. Lane of the Building Inspection and Design Division; Mr. McGuire and Ms.Briggs of the Planning Division staff. ABSENT: *Tracy *Excused The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman. Commercial State Bank. #10611: Rehearing to consider new evidence presented following the Zoning Committee's original hearing of a request for a Nonconforming Use Permit. Mr. McGuire gave a new slide presentation which included pictures from the inside of the building, and additional information for the staff report. Mr. McGuire noted several health and safety code violations on the property. He also noted that the semi-trailer had been removed from the rear of the premises. McGuire stated in his opinion, reuse of the structure for a conforming purpose would not be feasible. He also stated that the Small Business Division of Planning and Economic Development has been working with the developer on this property acquisition. Attorney Steve Rau, who is representing Commercial State Bank, the property owner, addressed the committee stating the bank feels there has been no discontinuation of nonconforming use. He noted that the bank had been actively seeking to lease the property since they evicted the last tenant. Mr. Rau also stated that the bank would suffer a serious financial loss, which would impose a hardship on them, if some reuse of the property were not allowed. He also noted that the property has been paying about $9,000 per year in real estate taxes. Although considerable work would have to be done to the structure to bring it up to code, the current developer, has agreed to do this work. In response to a question from a committee member, Mr. McGuire stated that the developer had previously testified there would be 12 to 15 deliveries per week and one-fourth of those deliveries would be from semi-trucks. Hours of operation for the business would be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Mr. Vaught stated he would like to consider making restrictions on delivery hours. Since the developer was not present, Mr. Christenson stated his frustration in not being able to ask the developer if the restrictions on delivery hours and type of delivery trucks would be acceptable to the them. Mr. Neid stated he would like the developer to restrict delivery hours from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday. Ms . Hirte also stated her frustration that the developer was not present to give an opinion on the restrictions. No one else spoke in support of the petitioner's request. � . cjD -/�� 2� . , Commercial State Bank #10611 Page T�ao May 31, 1990 Susan Omoto, District Four Community Council Representative spoke in opposition. She re-stated the community's main concern was semi-truck traffic on the neighborhood streets. The community feels that Beech Street has carried most of the traffic to this site in the past. Ms. Omoto stated that Hansons, the developers, did not know about the hearing until two days ago, and were not able to come today. She stated the bank was not interested in speaking to other parties Ms. Omoto referred who had interest in the site, because the bank said the referrals would only offer half of what the property is worth. Mr. Rau spoke in rebuttal stating that the bank has a contract with the Hansons which they must honor until such time as it is clear that their use will not be allowed on the property. The bank is therefore not in a position to offer the building to others who might be referred by the interested neighborhood. Following Mr. Rau's rebuttal, Ms. Morton closed the public hearing. Mr. Christenson recommended approval of a Change in Non-Conforming Use based on findings one through three of the original staff report, subject to the conditions that the developer prepare a site survey of the existing layout, provide paving for the gravel parking lot at the rear of the building, and designated parking spaces for use by tenants, employees, and visitors to the site. Landscaping and screening are to be provided in accordance with city standards and specifications. He also recommended that the loading dock area be used for off-street parking for the upper tenant's vehicle and the applicant's vehicles. There are to be no more than 25 delivery vehicles coming to the site per week and no more than six of those deliveries are to be from semi-trucks. The semi-truck deliveries must be between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The hours of operation shall be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. , Monday through Thursday and until 10:00 p.m. Friday and 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday. Mr. Vaught seconded the motion. Mr. McGuire stated that the trash will be stored inside the structure and will be removed daily. Mr. Christenson stated he does not want to expand the amount of semi-truck deliveries in excess. Mr. Vaught stated he is generally opposed to making delivery restrictions but in this case it is not unreasonable. Mr. Segal stated the discussion was focused on the re-use of the building as it conforms to use, etc. The first floor probably will not be converted to housing. Mr. Vaught stated he has had a personal account with Commercial State Bank but is unbiased in this issue and will vote. Ms. Morton stated on a vote of four in favor and three opposing, the Zoning Committee will recommend approval of the Nonconforming Use Permit to the Planning Commission on June 8, 1990. Submitted by: Approved by: i � /. ��/. /i �-' ✓�.�`t ` `� �'`;,-�';,,c,_',. ,/.% _r` ' �J�-.. _ - � �`, Charles L. McGuire Gladys Morton, Chairman � q��7�L . ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT FILE #10611 1. APPLICANT: Commercial State Bank DATE OF HEARING: S/31/90 2. CLASSIFICATION: Nonconforming Use Permit REHEARING TO CONSIDER NEW EVIDENCE 3. LOCATION: 940 Beach Street, (southeast corner of Beach & Forest) 4. PLANNING DISTRICT: FOUR S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 28-30, Adam Gotzian's Subdivision of Block 107, Lyman Dayton's Addition. 6. PRESENT ZONING: RT-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: §62.102. (e) (5) 7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: May 25, 1990 BY: Charles L. McGuire A. PURPOSE: REHEARING TO CONSIDER NEW EVIDENCE PRESENTED FOLLOWING THE ZONING COMMITTEE'S ORIGINAL HEARING OF A REQUEST FOR A NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT. B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Attached for the Zoning Committee's review is the information provided to the Planning Commission and staff following the continued hearing of the Commercial State Bank application by the Zoning Committee on May 3, 1990. This information is provided as pages 1 through 5 of the attachments. For your convenience, pages 6 through 10 of the attachment are the draft resolution submitted for the Zoning Committee, and the minutes of the hearings held by that body. The remaining materials in the attachment are the original staff report and its attachments. - ` ��--�� Commercial State Bank Commercial and Executive Banking Center 2000 Minnesota Worid Trade Center 30 East 7th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 612-291-9599 Fax 291-9500 May 11, 1990 Ms. Peggy Reichert Deputy Director, Planning Division Dep�.rtment of Planning & Economic Developnent 1100 City Hall Annex, 7th Floor St. Paul, I�Il�i 55102 Re: 940 Beech Street Non-Conforming Use Permit Dear Ms. Reichert: This letter is a formal request that the Planning Com�►ission reconsider the Zoning Coma�►ittee's denial of Co�nercial State Bank's, (CSB) , application for a non-conforming use permit for the above-referenced property. This letter will first outline the facts pertinent to CSB's ownership of this property as well as the property's previous non-conforming use. Then this letter will describe why the Planning Coc�nission should reconsider CSB's applica.tion and why a denial of the non-conforming variance would work tm.reasona.ble hardship on CSB. CSB foreclosed the mortgage which it held on the above-referenced property. On June 2, 1987, said bank purchased the property at the Sheriff's Foreclosure Sale. The period of redemption expired December 2, 1987, at which time CSB became fee owner of the property. On September 9, 1987, subject property wa.s inspected by Robert Johnson Associates for the purpose of estimating its Fair Market Value. The appraisal and analysis revealed at that time a Fair Market Value of $150,000.00 The subject property is loca,ted on the southeast corner of Beech Street and Forest Street in St. Paul, Minnesota, with about 120 feet on Beech Street and 134 feet on Forest Street. The site comprises 16,000 square feet (120' x 134' ) . The rear 44 feet of the site is open and is a gravel surfaced parking area. The site also provides a loading and pa.rking area on the front side. The first floor contains wa.rehouse areas and severa.l areas which are walk-in type coolers. The older two-story pa.rt of the building contains some open storage areas and 2 walk-in cooler areas. There is an additiona.l walk-in cooler which was just storage and not cooled. Ba.sica.11y the remainder of the first floor area is cooled stora.ge area including a loading dock area, wa.lk-in cooler area and production area. From the date of acquisition on December 2, 1987 to November 14, 1988, the property was occupied by Reddi Fresh, a fruit and vegetable distributor. Tenants also occupied the second floor. � Eaual Onportunitv Emplover . � �� _.�.�� Ms. Peggy Reichert Ma,y 11, 1990 Page 2. On November 1, 1988, CSB engaged a realtor to market the property. On October 24, 1989, Robert Hansen signed a Purchase Agreement for the siun of $135,000.00. Robert and Susan Hansen own and operate the Professional Ca.tering Service, (PCS) , presently doing business at 720 Pa.yne Avenue in St. Paul. PCS was founded in 1972 by the Hansens and has grown from a small coffee shop to a cafeteria, to a thriving catering service. PCS's present corporate clients include Group Health, H. B. Flzller, MEA, as well as some state offices. Mr. Hansen and CSB have applied for city garticipation in financing the acqui- sition and rehabilita.tion of the building for the Hansens. Over the past year we have worked diligently with Mr. Craig 0'Brien, of St. Paul's Depa.rtment of Planning and Economic Development, to successfully cons��a.te this transaction. A failure to approve CSB's application for a non-conforming use would result in substantial financial loss and would work an unreasonable hardship on CSB. For example, as the attached letter from Robert Johnson Associates illustrates, complying with existing zoning and use requirements is not economica.11y feasible. The use of this property in its current state is the onl logical and economic use of the property. More specifica.11y, two irrefuta,ble facts support CSB's position. First, the cost of tearing down the present structure and converting it to a multi- residential or single family housing units would not be realized in the sub- sequent sale price of those units; the present residential real estate market for the area involved. clearly illustrates the non-viability of this alter- na.tive. Second, CSB has marketed this building for over two ears and the present buyer, who requires a non-conforming use of the property, has been the only viable buyer for this property. Indeed, since the structure was built on the property, its use historically has been non-conforming. The residents of the neighborhood have indicated that they have suffered a hardship due to previous occupants of the property. Our position is that the proposed occupant is substantially different in nature and would become a vibrant addition to the area. Neighborhood opposition to the proposed non-conforming use seems to be premised entirely on past experiences with Anderson Meats. These past experiences, however, concern a heavy co�nercial use of the property which contrasts with the present proposed catering business. This potential buyer has expressed a willingness to comply with all of the Zoning Committee's Staff Report Recom- mendations. This buyer also will not be utilizing the heavy, semi-tractor trailers as frequently, as CSB's previous tenant, Reddi Fresh, did. Any deliveries to the proposed buyer's business would be during regular working hours and would cease by 6:00 p.m. � . � q�-/�aZ Ms. Peggy Reichert Ma,y 11, 1990 Page 3. Contrary to the neighborhood opposition to CSB's non-conforming use appli- cations, the Zoning Committee's Sta.ff issued the following findings: 1) The land and building cannot be used economically for a conforming purpose. 2) The proposed use as a catering facility is more appropriate than the previous heavy con�nercial non-conforming use. 3) Rather than rebuilding or leaving the land and building vacant, the proposed use would be consistent with the health, safety, morals, and general welfaxe of the com�mmity. 4} Lastly, the use and access, if properly regulated., would be consistent with the reasonable use and enjoyment of ad,jacent property. These findings are consistent with Section 62.10 Z (5) and (11) of the St. Paul Zoning Code. In conclusion, CSB respectfully requests that the Planning Commission reconsider the Zoning Co�ittee's recommended. denial of CSB's applica.tion for a non-conforming use permit at 940 Beech Street. In the alterna.tive, if the Planning Commission will not reconsider the Zoning Com�nittee's recomanended denial, then CSB respectfully requests that the ma.tter proceed to hearing before the City Council. Very truly yours, �ERCIAL STATE BANK IN ST. PAUL ` J � �� gy �.. �,.. Rich L. Ka.stner, President RLK/jvd Ehclosure 3 �,�F��..�� 1�-_� Si=� it=�:��r, F=t'=;_,�_�i= �:_!�FI�-E ='�•%r= F'•� � _ i . ��ota �g��a • c�� b a 42..5 Wh�fe B�ar Pdrkway V�/hite �etjr LakQ, Minn ��OC:1,�T�5 /�C`,�TES APPRAlSAl.�: �ESIbENTIAI. • �C�MPvIERCfAL b iNDUSTF�IAL � A�RICU�TURAL May .�, J.990 COr?MERCIP.L STAT� BANK c/o Mrs . Vanant�.a Cri��on 2000 Minnesc�a �AOrl;� Trade Cente� 30 East 7th S�re�� St . Paul, i^.innesota 55101 Dear li�s . Crititon; At yau� �eques� w� offer the £ollowing �bservations relating to the (�roperty loca�ed �t 9�0 Beech St�:eeL in SL• . Pau1 , Minnesotia _ Zn our appraisal of �he �roperty in Sep�ember of 19d7 we autl�.ned �;h� sp�ca.al �ur�osa the �rope�ty has b��n c�esigned �o se�ve over the yeaLS . This special purpose inv�lves the use of c•�a�.k-in cool�r facilitie,� and id�a��lg dack areas as well. as op�:n production areas. As ou�J.�.ned in tha� r�part it was anc� sti11 our opinion �hat the present use is th� highes� and best use. In order to be in cornpliance with existing �onirLg and nat operate under a sp�cial use permit o�- other per- miss�.on frcm th� City would require a use pe�rmitted unde� RT--1 �onzng . mhis �aning is tor 2 farnily dwelling� - The uses pe�mitted by special conc7a.tions incluc3�� buti arEn ' t �.�mited �.o, fraternity and sora�i�y house if by a school which wculdn ' � apply h�re. �?ursery school or day care fa�ility. This is possib�.e bu� un �.he apprazser ' s opinion not economicly feasib?e. The cos� o£ install.ation of restroom facili�i�s and a H�al�.h Uepartm�nt ap��oved food szrvice facility �aould be very cost7_y. Also much new techna�ogy e.xists in da�% care cent�rs which woulc3 be p�ohibi�.i.sre in �t1e subject building without exccpt- ionally hiqh cc°ts . It.ems such ag heai;cd iloors in areas used b� sma?1 childr�n � ven�ilation equipment , establish� ment of playc�round faciliti.es _ Also tlie suk?�ecC building � �`<<;" ,,. t. ' ::, � -j � � '. ;:,. � i ;'i ;,f. �+ �,�� NA71:;11:iL i��..:i,'fi.n,..; ' ., s�. �... ... . .i� i �. . . .. . . �, . � '►°iH',' i�_, '��_, i�_,:a, H�_;_;�:_;�_ �:_�r-r1�=E -;�,:�_�; F� _ 911-'��'t� Z.. . zs located jus� 3 blocks �rom . a major indust�-ia7. area df Si;• Paul . It is the apprais�r ' s opinion that even without acqui,sition cos�s such a p�oject is not economically feasib].e . Grou� homes are pe�mi�ted in the a�ea but again with �he extensi.v� rernodeling necessa��r i� is �he appraiser ' s opinion �hat such a use is agazn not feasibl�. The �equired parking and loading areas would pd$�ibly be a problem �o justify �,he number of -tennants n�ces�ary for a profitable veni:ure. It is th� appraiseY ' � opiniori tha� a use such as thxs would no� be economi�ally £easible because of extensiv� remodeling cos�s . Also included in �his pu�pose would be a community resic�entia7 �acili�y. zn summation, i� is �he �pp�aise� 's opinion that a use which makes usg o{ the subject in its current state is thE only :loqical and economic use of �he propez-�y, ro not continue in �his use would result in a �ubstanciaJ. financial loss . rf we may be pf any furth�r assistance please ieel free ta COI7tdCt L15. Respect�ul)y submi��ed, Roa ,�ox ora A ocz��Es n E. Steenslat�d, C EA � � q�-/�� 2.. � �� j� � � \) ' COMMITTEE CITY C� �NNESOTA ON MAY 3 , 1990 u PRESENT: Mmes . t t; Messrs . Christenson, Neid, Kajer, ttee; Mr. Segal, Assistant City Att ',� _ �g Inspection and Design Division � � �� f the Planning Division staff. �� * one �' V�� ABSENT: No � The meeting was chaire Commercial State Bank 1 �� To consider a request f � (NCUP) to permit use of the existing structure � i ` _ ,� This is a continuance frc , �i� � ,�!� '' unittee Meeting. Mr. ' /i on. He stated the McGuire stated he would n �� J staff' s previous recommenc � �nditions. Mr. McGuire stated the property is own ' btained through a foreclosure. There was pre � wholesale business in the building. It has been i, Susan Omotto, District Four � ��ed the committee about the Land Use Committee's recc _ iisted in the Dayton's Bluff Council memo dated April 26, . �and Use Committee passed approval based on the property being a ,,.�� non-conforming use. Ms . Omotto stated the two most important concerns are numbers two and six on the memo. She also stated there was a communication breakdown between the neighborhood residents and the previous community organizer. Apparently there was no file created on this property. Ms. Omotto stated the neighbors do not want semi-truck traffic generated. Mr. Neid asked if the neighbors had filed any complaints about the previous business on this property. Ms . Omotto stated she did not know since there was no file kept, but the City staff told her this was an issue before. Ms. Hirte asked Ms. Omotto if the issue of semi-truck traffic was discussed at the full council meeting. Mr. Omotto stated, no. Ms. Denise Potting of 932 Beech St. addressed the committee in opposition to the proposal. She had posters and photographs for the committee' s review. She stated that Ms. Hanson, the applicant, told her they would push forward to obtain this property for the purpose of expanding their business and they expect to reach $1,000,000 this year. Ms. Potting' s concern is the potential for expansion of the business including the increased number of deliveries and the increase of semi-trucks on the neighborhood streets at late hours of the night. She is also concerned about the increased on-street parking problem. She suggested alternative uses for the property: green space, homes , 24-hour day-care center, senior citizen center, or a three-plex residence. Ms . Potting stated there is a preschool nearby in a church and a day-care center at 919 Beech St. with approximately 60 children plus the residents` children, who would all be endangered by the semi-truck traffic. There is only one lane of traffic on the street. Ms. Potting stated she did not file a complaint about the previous business because she did not think anything could be done about it since it was legal. However, now that the building is vacant, the residents decided it was the correct time to take opposition. � . � �'�r�� Commercial State Bank Page Two May 5, 1990 Ms. Anna Nadeau of 969 Beech Street addressed the committee in opposition to the proposal. Her concerns are the semi-truck traffic on the street, residents' car damage and property damage caused by the trucks, trucks blocking the school bus stop, blockage of the fire hydrant, and the rat problem caused by meat. She also stated the neighborhood lost six parking spaces because the semi-trucks needed the space to maneuver. She stated support of the idea for another day-care center to serve the 3M employees in the neighborhood. Mr. Neid asked if any complaints were filed to the City regarding previous sidewalk damage to neighbor's property. Ms. Nadeau stated, no. Applicant Ms. Bobbi Hanson and her father Mr. Bob Hanson, who are the owners and operators of the catering service, addressed the committee. Ms. Hanson stated they own four, gasoline operated vehicles, the largest being a cube van. Any additional vehicles purchased would be vans. There are 12-15 deliveries per week, one-fourth are from semi-trucks. Delivery hours are 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday hours would be 10:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. ; the business will not be open on Sunday. In regard to number six on the list of Land Use recommendations, Ms. Hanson stated they would need to go through normal insurance procedures, and would not be able to pay for any damage up front. She also stated there are fourteen off-street parking spaces behind the building, there is a garage in front of the building for the tenants upstairs and another spot behind the garage. There is plenty of space near the loading dock to park the business vehicles. Ms . Hanson stated their business is presently on Payne Avenue and she wishes to keep the business on the east side of Saint Paul since most of her employees are from the east side. Ms. Hanson stated her present filter system meets all the health and safety codes required, but she could not meet request number five for a filter system to control cooking odors. (The only odors are from fresh baked bread and rolls. ) Mr. Hanson stated all the trash would be stored inside the trash room. If the business grows , the amount of supplies would increase with each delivery, but the deliveries would only increase to 20-25 deliveries per week. Mr. Neid asked about the number of current employees . Ms. Hanson stated there are 13 full-time employees working from 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday. Ms. Hanson stated she is agreeable to surfacing the parking lot in the back of the building. .8' . �'� -/��z Commercial State Bank Page Three May 3, 1990 Ms. Morton closed the public hearing. Mr. McGuire stated large trucks are required to stay on main "hall routes" but then may use the shortest possible route, including a residential street to reach their destination. There should not be any blocking of residential streets, and there should be no trucks lined up on the street waiting to deliver. Mr. Segal stated the committee could not condition the permit regarding truck routes to the business. Mr. McGuire stated there is a vacant residential apartment on the second floor, but it is not economically feasible to convert the first floor to apartments . No expansion to the second floor or outside the footprint of the building would be allowed under the non-conforming use permit. Mr. Christenson moved to deny the permit, based on a finding that the developer had not demonstrated unreasonable hardship or economic infeasibility of reusing the existing structure for a conforming purpose. Ms. Hirte seconded the motion. Ms. Morton stated on a vote of six in favor, two opposing, the Zoning Committee will recommend to the Planning Commission on May 11, 1990 denial of the non-conforming use permit. Submitted by: Approved by: �� a Charles L. McGuire Gladys Morton, Chairman 9 . ' �,� _/��_ MINUTES OF THE ZONING COMMIT'I*EE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ON APRIL 5, 1990 PRESENT: Mmes. Morton, Wencl, and Hirte; Messrs. Neid, Vaught, and Christenson of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Segal, Assistant City Attorney; Mr. Zangs of Code Enforcement; Mr. McGuire and Ms. Briggs of the Planning Division staff. EXCUSED: Ms. Tracy and Mr. Kajer The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairman. Commercial State Bank, File #10611: To consider a request for a Nonconforming Use Permit (NCUP) to permit use of the existing structure for a catering business. Mr. McGuire gave a slide presentation and staff report. Mr. McGuire stated there has been a request for a layover until May 3, 1990, to allow time for meetings between district council, - the developer, the adjoining neighbors, and the owner. Commercial State Bank does not have a problem with the delay. The bank has obtained the building by a foreclosure. Ms. Morton will continue the public hearing until May 3, 1990. The developer, Robert Hanson of 8365 - 115 St. So. , Cottage Grove addressed the committee and stated the layover would not be a problem for him. Gladys Morton stated it was moved and seconded to have the item on the agenda May 3, 1990. Submitted by: Approved by: � , � iid��j�--�'�� Charles L. McGuire Gladys M on, Chairman r .. .;`.f� f� . �a -i.�z ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT FILE #10611 1. APPLICANT: Commercial State Bank DATE OF HEARING: 4/5/90 2. CLASSIFICATION: Nonconforming Use Permit 3. LOCATION: 940 Beach Street, (southeast corner of Beach & Forest) 4. PLANNING DISTRICT: FOUR S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 28-30, Adam Gotzian's Subdivision of Block 107, Lyman Dayton's Addition. 6. PRESENT ZONING: RT-1 ZONING CODE REFERENCE: §62.102. (e) (5) 7. STAFF INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: DATE: March 23, 1990 BY: Charles L. McGuire A. PURPOSE: To consider a request for a Nonconforming Use Permit (NCUP) to permit use of the existing structure for a catering business. B. PARCEL SIZE: The parcel has 120 feet of frontage on Beach Street and 134 feet of frontage on the east side of Forest Street. The area of the parcel is 16,080 square feet. C. EXISTING LAND USE: The property is presently occupied by a vacant structure which was most recently used in a fruit and vegetable distribution business. The site was at one time used as a meat processing plant. D. SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Mixed density housing on land zoned RT-l. East: Single and two-family housing on RT-1 zoned land. South: Single and two-family housing on RT-1 zoned land, West: Mixed density housing on land zoned RT-l. E. ZONING CODE CITATION: §62.102. (e) (S) states that "when a nonconforming use of a structure, or structure and land in combination, is discontinued or ceases to exist for three hundred sixty five (365) days, the structure, or structure and land in combination, shall thereafter be used in conformance with the regulation of the district in which it is located, unless the planning commission pursuant to a public hearing, finds that the structure, or structure and land in combination, cannot reasonably or economically be used for a conforming purpose, that the proposed use is equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district than the previous nonconforming use, and that the proposed use is consistent with the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community and is consistent with the reasonable use and enjoyment of adjacent property. Where a nonconforming use of a structure, land, or structure and land in combination is . � q� '/y�U File #10611 Page Two. hereafter changed to a more restrictive classification, it shall not thereafter be changed by the planning commission to a less restrictive classification under this clause. F. HISTORY: The existing structure was used by Peters Packing Co. during the early 1960's and was a legal nonconforming use of property at that time. In 1961, a request for expansion of the nonconforming use was denied by the city. The most recent use of the property as noted above was for vegetable processing. Area neighbors have complained to the zoning office since notice of the public hearing went out that "heavy trucks, semi-trailer trucks have been a problem with the most recent use of the property. F. FINDINGS: l. The property was clearly designed for and operated as a heavy commercial use. It does not appear that the land and building can be reasonably or economically reused for a conforming purpose. 2. The proposed use as a catering facility appears to be " . . .equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district than the previous nonconforming use. . ." . 3. If the use and the access thereto is properly regulated, the proposed use would be " . . .consistent with the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. . ." . 4. If the use and access is property regulated it would be " . . .consistent with the reasonable use and enjoyment of adjacent property. . ." . G. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above suggested findings, staff recommends approval of the request for a nonconforming use permit subject to conditions as follows: 1. A site survey and a complete site plan be prepared showing the layout of the existing buildings and open areas on the site. 2. The gravel parking area at the rear of the buildings be surfaced for off-street parking and loading area, and the storage of trucks, trailers, and refuse in this area be discontinued. 3. That adequate landscaping and screening be provided in and around the parking areas to protect adjacent residential property. � � �o .�y� z Commercial State Bank, #10611, Index 1. Application for Nonconforming Use Permit 2 . Commercial State Bank Letter dated March 7, 1990 3 . Neighborhood Letter and Petition 4 . & 5. Maps 6. Site Plan � � 9�J/��v APPIICATION FOR NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT CITY OF SAINT PAUL ZONING OFFICE USE ONLY Zoning File # C��'l� d 1 �� V �� Application Fee $� 3� � �� MAR � 1990 Tentative Hearing Date L�� " �� Z 0 NIN G Number of Lots or Size of Parcel : A legal nonconforming use of structure/land is one which lawfully existed on October 25, 1975, the effective date of the adoption of the Saint Paul Zoning Code. Application is hereby made for a Nonconforming Use Permit under provisions of Chapter 62, Section 102, Subdivision 5, Paragraph of the Zoning Code. A. APPLIC�A�NT �',/ �J Name C:L'^nMQ�I�'L S'll�l� ��'��< • V•�1ti`�'`j C�l�Y� Phone (Daytime) Z 7��``I� Address ZU�� '2L'� 1��, ��n.i B(�� 5T: �,�rv� /� �✓ Zi p 5��01 Property interest of Applicant Owner contract purchaser, etc. ) Name of owner (if different) ��.��1��J j I�}2uc.>6U �(>�-`zGi.-U��12� B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION j /� Address/Location � U � e•�'�v v �--�-�-� r`� . � S'/� �, Legal Description: LotS '7'�Y�t3� Block*/o7 Add�i _-.,.,� .�� ,�=,,��`�.�-�>-. �. ��-. /��,�� 1�-�.=<-...� . � �,,..�. � _�-� o• Present Zoning � � - � Lot Size /�D�X 3�� ( �� , • C. USE INFORMATION Previous Use (Attach supporting documentation) �Zh--^�,� ��-._-,� �--�-�,-�..�, �-�''�.f'�-�- ` ��(. ) ��a�z� ,� � r Q��.,.�.,.:c /� ,G�[.� • ��-�v� � �y 4-..>l� f-� �z��--zi f�� --� Proposed Use or Change (Attach Site Plan) G��`� . / � 1 f � c� CL� . �-�-rv`�—�-� ' « ! �"7 �: . / / /�' / L � ( / �,J� T -�-� � / y- . � �-y._,� � G�->"K.tyl (�"�. L� C/�-t� � [i�.. � � -�+.-c�4- .L�T-'L/ � /'�`��"c� - � if yo.. ha.e any questi�ns , please conLact: Saint Paul Zoning Office, 1100 City Hall Annex ,_,_,�,� 4102 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul , Minnesota 55102 (298-4154) � 2/85 � � � •/�ot� . 9 Commercial State Bank Commercial and Executive Banking Center 2000 Minnesota World Trade Center 30 East 7th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 612-291-9599 Fax 291-9500 �tarcri i, 1990 ^ir. Chuck McGuire Si�. Paul Zoning �fCice 1100 Cit,y Hall Annex St. Paixl, Minnesota 55102 Re: 940 Beech Street St. Paul, i`Iiru�iesota :i5106 �Jear 1 Ir. McGuire: Enclosed herewith you will fi_nd our application for i�vn-Conformir� Use Permit for t.he above captioned propert�� and our Gashier's l;hec�� #12�89 in �he amow�i� of �3U0.00 to cover the filing fee. P.lease process t;he application at tiour earliest cori��enience and ad�-is�� us of �our findings. Should you need any additiorial informa.tiori or Piliizg fo�'1118� du tiok; hesitate to call me directl,v at 291-b842. iue .lool; forward to a favorable dispositiori of our request. Sincer�l�, . - =/ �/ �� , ..�.1/, 'v`--_ t V.y I. Cri i,ton Seriior ti'ice President C;onu�iercial Rea.l Estai�e Lending VIC/jvd Enclr�s��res � ''1 _.. Equal Opportunity Employer p� l � qA -��roZ Ms Gladys Morton, Chair, Zoning Committee 1100 City Hall Annex 25 W. 4th St. , St Paul, Mn 55101 Re: Property located at 940 Beech St. , St Paul, Mn Dear Ms Morton: Relative to the reestablishing a non conforming commercial use of the building located at 940 Beech St., St Paul, Mn the following factors must be considered before this change is approved: 1. There will again b e large trucks including semi tractor trailers using facilities for delivery. 2. This site cannot accomodate these trucks because of the relatively narrow street and curbs. 3. Past experience has illustrated a complete blocking of Beech street while these trucks maneuver or wait for delivery. 4. This blocking of the street presents a very serious safety hazard as emergency vehicles cannot get through. 5. On one occasion, two years ago , a para-med emergency vehicle was required to back all the way to Cypress street in order to get through with his very sick patient. Beech street was com- pletely blocked with a semi-tractor trailer. 6. The noise is intolerable both day and night with these heavy trucks, particularly those with refrigeration equipment. 7. The lawns and sidewalks are always driven upon while they are attempting to back into the loading dock. 8. Parking is already tight on Beech Street as several parking spaces are "signed" No Parking toaccomodate the trucks. 9. The exhause fumes from the trucks permeate into surrounding homes during the summer months making living conditions INTOLERABI.E. 10. The maintenance of areas surrounding the building has been much tobe desired and certainly does not meet therequirements of the City of St Paul. 11. This building has served its purpose the past 80 years and should be torn down to make way for progress in the Daytons Bluff area as a truly residential area. The following names, address and signatures attest to the above. �� — _� � !�v - /.��; , /��4-�y -e. /�-�G),�� S S _ . ..f'/G/'��i-v� -e, , ' _ _ _ c ,;.� ' p�1 �r?�✓L /'��'.( �V_�'�1!':��/ M,�� G �-t , l��ose� : 9 �� _�� .1 �. _ �-r.�}�J✓i�J _v,/�,�7 [),� � � f� 7�7� %��L" � c l� J ./ , ,`? f �f;�� L <��-��",iyZ.. F.>'-"` � �`,-2�;�, ' , ,• _ /lJ � — _ / ._ _ U�ti,� ��,!c�iCS�k�-C� �' `�S`,� ��c �� .�` =-�'`� ��v �-- .�_%'�� %�,� :�-r)�Z-�-a->c��--�. 7��v� �t ,E�� /�� N c- � f S 1 �C��c..�lZ.�. ��.��. � ` �:��c.��T�� _`��l '� . � _ �� __ , _ ._ ��--� t�� / � ��- - �'�"� __�__ _ _ G� _ ' 3 � - - _ _ . � , �'�� c�� _ y�� ,��_ s��- __J:t.�-�� _ _ _ �� _ _ _ Y y � �. ` �, � .�m C'��' 9�� /3��.r s, _ . �sT f' u_ _ __-- _ _ �j'�,� /-�i�� 7 � ��'�c�: s� ��/��( _ _ � � L. � e�� =S�� s�'�' �.�� (�,�e� c a�-i q�� . _ h ��- .�� :; � n r1�� N �1�-�� (,� � �C� � �`�--C>sL�,�'1 S"� S�- t�cr� ( C��'��, CL't��.ui . �''� _. . , ��7rry E�� n�t�. <<:-i�- 1 E h? l��1��+ _-,`��` i��'�-- �,�'�� i�.-F�c.�., -� . . , , � � , . . _. , , . t t�� -��t-1�' A�'�'i'r► �� : �`�rr�,�� l'�'� _�`�j�'� '��; �� . � , _ � . �� :.,5��'� �� . r��r��..� , . .. T ��,��t t� N �c y E ly( ;n�N E�+,��a _Sr. .��_�. _M ,_ -. ° ��-t.-� � 1 � �e-F�_ ��r��e i� _ __ _ q3.6 .�G, s�: . _ �7=�_ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ ��.� � � .� �"��i�? / .!I . .�, �� 35",�'�a�r f � .,, Y��'�c� - ��'� -_ ___ � G�'S�«_ xl��i� oG z- R�l� til z�- sr _ rP�� n �� `k� - _ . ��i� �� u�.--� <�� .� ��( �� S �rs.s ��.z � �� _ .,� .�� . �� , �� rr� � ��-.s�c � � � � - �'l :�� (�� / ��e ,2 � ,��-e s /� /�� e e�/� �-�` � �_� r'1�GN�K1�'L l��19�7� 9'yo � I'�l�AJ/(J�'�{/9�Il9' s%l�� 1�/�'(.�`� T�� -3 - . q�-•/�a z CITIZEN PAR ICIPATIO DIS RI TS �nR�.•(Y �h T � `\ �.( � � : `�. a�� '� -4 � �O .,....:-. �i . . . � c ra�v. � ' yP•,�. � xtf.-� j; � � . E r �4 .. S 12y r 6 = � � - 5 � _!�[: •�.+�L w. � 8 i �.�'1.,� „E N�� •� ~ , �4 � �oTr . - :ASE St � � G�F R t � ac�c[ �y, i ' � F E �in Sf 1 � � -.�,,,� � 1� � £ - � , ; wErw +vE E 5• ; MaE�wM �� F ; �_ � R�H � 4 6 SI � � { v+�i4Y - � E 3 �' : � a _ ? �^L • w y � w... .rt.' v �s 9 e.na +� 4 x�e� .,�c _... eun ; _ . . A 40 � �p 4 � � � � ll� SI Gy ` Mi Yt - � '.'� � ��' ; ��Y, _ � " r� .�c �} �a8 �o � � 5�C��n u( _ / �p 14 r ` ^ ,a *8�� E«fe50+ wE � �� fC�+tit S' ��r„� {� lO+ttP 4..��. ,� - �.� ; ; _. 1 � � , . � � , : d ? f � - J # �'� � � �' / r� q 40 ; ? Y ; � ^ � ; Y 4 ! �a � a _ � � w. _ .. "�:r` - .,.�s - 'e .�+.wr,s s� \h ; ..c T _ �� - r«w. � ��y =; .e� . �11 . - � 15' = ' E� � / \ M� w�AE�i �'E ' � �� ,{ `EOGQAH �D \\`n� ll Y r V � 4 \ r� C _ ,;, . `� t.n.c '`''� f ` ��\ \1 rve � \�\ ' ' �' \. .Vpc a000 lOJO�EE� � •unE CITIZE�� PARTICIPATIO�� PLANNIP�G DISTRICTS 1. SUNRAY-BATTLE CREEK-HIGHWOOD 2. HAZEL PARK HAYDEN-PROSPERITY HEIGHTS HILLGREST 4JFST ST flF 4. DAYTON'S BLUFF 5. �- 6. NORTH EN D 7. THOPIAS-DALE 8. SUMMIT-UNIVERSITY 9. ;JEST SEVEP�TH 10. COMO 11. HAMLINE-MI DWAY 12. ST. ANTHONY 13. MERRIAM PK.-LEXINGTON HAMLINE-S^�ELLING HA"1LINE 14. GROVELAND-MACALESTER 15. HIGHLAND 16. SUMMIT HILL '�� :� � : , 17. DOWNTOWN a „�y.,. 9., �.,�? ?n�? � �Q(O �O-:-i 7 _ ;] , , � �� '7 ��.{ i i' I:i . � � i;� 1� � - . ._.._ i � , _ � � �fy�� . .. . - . - - �� ... � ,... ... .. , ., . _ ... ... ,.. _ - - _= . . _ . -_ = , ..� . � .,,. ... . . , .- _ � . ,..,� -_ ... - -� _ ��,.::�, ' i� . . ... . .�� .,. � ..� T _ " __ �1.,� '�7 ..; � ' . y� - ,:; ....., ..._ � .. ' ��-= -_.:, ..� . � ._ : ... ;;-`. � - - _.� .., _ ;:,� „ _ . _ , ._ . -- �; ;__. . - .� . , _. _... . ,;., . _ ,.. � : : :... .... _ — , ....�._ . _ � ,� . �.,.� . � , ,,, a - ._._�. , : � = _ . � _ . _ ....,� ._ ; = r - �-- - � - � „ .T,. , . � . � . ---�'_ �^_� __ ,� -�_. , >,. . �' � . .. _.,N ;� - � ` - — _..__ . , � , . _ _ __ _ �� ' ' - - — . . .... ' _ _. _ _ ..:.... ,;L <._� .!>- _ -, � - ° _ ,,.:-: � i ' .. : Trt � �.' : , �_ � • • T __.._ " .. . �(� �L � � '' 3 �+_ �., ;� ,;� ', . _ ..., _ i k'- ' ' �..� � � i i �I � � ( _ . � i _ ._ _ . -' - - - ..... -� F� ,. _ � F '� .C•�..., , • . —s_.. _ B __ _f I � r"� — � ,- - �= i � � '� � 4 ' • • - , - - , _. ... .. . � < .�� ,� / ///� � � .;��:� _ _ _ __ . ... _ / �� - /.% ,+' z__ - - ' : , i , _ - . `.,r ./ •-, _/� • _ . ` , � , _ �. Iy.. . . �� : i �. ' �..,_ � .-.zznv. .- _ . � - _. _' _ .�,�. - ' / , _ � - "i ii� : ._' �- .�. - __ ` ' �� l �j' �`� _� - � _ -_ '- _ . '�- . . � .i. � � . �r -- . — '- -..< �_ _ 6, � / �� tt- --�. V. ` �t. -�� y � i � _ ` .. �� . � ` I� `: '� , — �r' x L ,.r.,, , .`1,�� .. / ��'� _ .6 �� i �r --�'...� ._ "_' '_ . . .. _ •• ' . , j - ` ��. s �. , ,. � . �. . '_�_ ' . . . . - t ,. - .� , . � �.;, � �_ \ :� .. , J. . � ^ . � �. . i S S� �r--�._ � � -.. . ��. -!S� � �� \\`� /'� '___ P P / Z�'� ,``_\._.._ ... � t _ /�ti' :��:`� ��'/ � . �i �.., � /�y -`� • / ��y�. `� � R \ ` ` � . �� .l /' '�-� � ....d,..., - . \ � @`�. 'e` �� .i1: �_ —_— y \ �4 �� '� _ DAYTON' S BLUFF DISTRICT 4 �N � � °" �-'°° '°`° •'°�=_"" S:ut .� fEC' _ �� '�. - I.�_..�.. �� :.:• � ��,----�1 .�.-� � ,.1� I t ,,�U� � � � j , J r.� � � i O;1 i � , , i ; ; ; ; . , ' ' , ' ' � � ��: , p '\' I�! ;� ,� �'�, O� OIO�•O O;O O ��O ��; 0 � � � . � � , ._. _ �._.— I�FNEFFf� �4 ----------- - — - � , :�:, �, o ,��,��: 'o��,'� 'b c� � � � o� ao'o � o .o' � � o o� o � �� .'' . -- ' '��o; , �' ` - -- . . . :. ; , ; -:, : ; .,.�..,�4_ -- - W.�i� .1 � � � v , P .\ ' , ....,�..._r.,I . . , . . . . _...._.�..4�..��....r._.. \ �Y'. 'O ��,��'��7 �Ji��J�O' + v `� ��,�� '� �Oy�; �. ¢O ¢ ¢p¢ C� U:; :� � ( _�. . $t-EC �'Y� �� ¢p'�� 0;�'¢�C�� ¢�GO 0 U'Gj�'O�c'�'U;��.�I� v,U �v;��V � �O U � ;O ;� ' ; j , . ' , � � � _L_ ; i � (0 ! � � � _ . , ! i i ' ij� i , I i OI�!OI�1Y j� O O O v''��'vfS-�U�xx�O;QI�;Q:O L O:%p'� O�Ot¢!O O U� O.¢ O O�:� Y;� O'O O O U� U � M� C,��T' �i� �o o��;o��!o;o,�!��o�o� r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � o o� o 0 0 00 ;o c , ��_�_ � i � '—r- � i .e.�.,— I i � � ..� �� o;o; o � oiQio�Q�o o:��o c�;�,!��¢��;n ¢ cn oo; o 0 0 � o � o ¢�;c; ;�:�:J o o � G*ti ST. � � � ° , o° � �o, �o,o � o�oio� �b' ' o oio� oi ,o o�o'o:o�o�o:o o'o� o o c �¢`�- -� , ��i�� ;¢; � �. , 4� � , , �� , , -a � � � � � . ___ _ � —� �.�i.� ! ! ; ; � � I , . � ; � � , � --- � �TG� '_- � � Q-l--' i ( � •• t ' � o��v� v :VI�IV Ov�O;� O�O � � I0 0!00 � iV �.;v vi�;p��;�•� , � , � � ; - S+h S T. ; i � , . , O O�O�O U!OiO; I ;OIO IO;O�-=�� O Q ' �U , Oi0 O OO O�O �O;OO G!O�O! 6 ;�l�i � I�I j � - O i ' ; i �'�� I ( i i I _ � � 1 I I I. . � � � �_ 1... L L�L_ _` .�.. '�°°�`n� ' O i • i � ' ' � � ! ; � � TT��--r"- -i �1 I T� f - I � � � � . . - �:� i � � , I ; , _o- —� I , ;;��' � i., ,, : I i � � ; �, v v v�v' � �. � o- -i�,�io o�o�o;o�oi�io; °o -� ;�lo;o,oi a�o;olo!o; „ o 0 0 � �-r: y+h 0 0 _Q Q Q -j�`;�:i��oiojo o�o - o � o�o o� �o o�o o`o� ol n o v o � o�� b o 0 0 0� � _ o — - : ; o o; cn �; ' � � �_�_ _ : . . �_ . . . : __ a w � OI O�-- w _I - � . i L i i __-� I -0_ O ; � • � � v p K � ;-�e � C��'�o;c�;�'o ' � � o 0 1 1 �� o o�o�, 'b o � o'o o� J � � o o�o 0 0 0 � -.- :>.<--- F'tt��-e�-- - -- -'`�1---��-�-, - ----- - •�---.. _-- - APPLICANT �h\$P-�C��hQ '� 'n� N�eG-� LEGEND PURPOSE �2.a� �� zoning district boundary FILE# �d��D3 DATE �" 25'q b � subjed property �north� �� PLNG. DIST � MAP # � f o one tamily • • � commerciaf SCALE 1" = 25�' �� n �faQ�rym;'., � �.� indust:ial i'< / , ,..,r.:, ��'i�`J�� t "' 1 ,' Y- __..��. $GlTY �P CITY OF SAINT PAUL �� , °Z DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ° ' " DIVISION OF PLANNING �, ��"111� a 25 West Fourth Street,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 a � 1111 111 II � � ~ 612-228-3270 +e°+ Fax:612-228-3220 JAMES SCHEIBEL ��CEfVED MAYOR JUN26�ggp June 25, 1990 �.��., „ �..LER�C Mr. Albert B. Olson, City Clerk Room 386, City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Mr. Olson: This letter is written to confirm the hearing date for: Applicant: Denise Potting & Ann Nadeau File Number: 10663 Purpose: Appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission Legal Description of Property: 940 Beech Street Lots 28-30, Blk 107; Gotzian Subdivision Previous Action: Planning Division Decision: Approved, vote:ll-2-1, June 8, 1990 Zoning Committee Recommendation: Approved, vote: 4-3, May 31, 1990 Board of Zoning Appeal: In order to allow time for the mailing of appropriate notices, please schedule � the hearing date as soon as possible after 7-:26-�0. Our preference would be 7-26-90. � �� I will phone you within the next few days for schedule confirmation. Sincerely, �a�,,�✓ i� �c+.�c.w• Daniel K. Bayers (3390) Zoning Section cc: File # 10663 Tanya