90-1370 LAID OVER TILL AUGUST 9, 1990 �
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. � I�
FINAL ORDER
By
File No. 59060
Voting In the Matter of Sidewalk Construction and/or reconstruction at the following
Ward location:
5 S9060 North side W Ivy Avenue from N Victoria to E Como Blvd.
,'
under Preliminary Order 90-805 approved 1�Ia.y l0a 1990
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice
thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve-
ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement
be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate
all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date AUG � 19�
Yeas Dimond Nays
Goswitz Certified ssed by Council Secretary
Long
Ma.ccabee � In Favor By
Rettman ��
Thune � Against
Wilson � AUG � � �ggp Mayor
PU6lISNEO ��� 1 8199Q
, �: _ , . Y..?-� . ... v,,.�,r . �
RETURN COPY TO VALUATIONS 8i 14SSESSMENT DIVISION �-; ° �'`�``"�' - '` �
ROOM 218 . , �- �°' , 4 ? � H
� - � � .�. .. a � ��i��. . ` ` - ' r�.
,,: , .� ., .. , • . .. • • '._ /f�
_ CITY OF ST. PAUL s.:r' � . ;- F ,-_; i� CO CI FILE N0. D'�1R � ' ,'
- , � ' � -- �
FINAL ORDER� z. tx � �,,.`�,� -, ; �.
r - BY '' ,,�' ,i , r ���}
# Y' ` , ; '" r,, � �. ���,�
� ' z ' � . ' :_: .>
. # - .. � : File No. _��9�58„ �9059, S9 _ ; . �
- r , � - � -
. , �
__
_ , � � "
�. ' � �° . ".y ;
_. :�.. _. . .. .. �
, ,. ... . _ , _ _ .
_ _ _: ,.. .. .. _ . . :_ �:
Voting _In the Matter of " F ' � ��
• - . _ •
� Ward . .;:
..:.. ...;-__ , Sidewalk Seconstruction at the following loc tions : :
5 � 59.058 North side W Cottage Aveaue from N St Albans to N Grotto St
_�: _ . -
' '`5 � ' S9059 � Both, sides W Hoyt Avenue from N Ozford St to N Lexington Pkwy ` �:
4 . . . . . � : . . . . � ' (�.
�
. . �. .. ..:'.. . .- .
s n ----
�.� 5 - S 9 0 6 0 N o r th s f d e �A��ary—�ve�ru�r o"m N�T c o r a°°t d`�—C�B1��-- �.
��t.:;' . . . ,:: ,;. . : '.� � . ,: . � .;� �: : � `' �;_:_�d:v�er—Z�r3-n�t�ft:
� � �r�-.,,o�:.-�.--�:--vz�u=az-ae�ar
For a 6—foot wfde side�ralk: �ew can�trnction, �15.b0 . ger front` ft . ;
, repl�►ce�a,�t�of <o2d sidevaik, 57.80 ger fra�a[ ft. _ , �;;
,_ 'w�i:;�,�_,_,�' - . : ': ." � �, �r
�4-.;.w...-.�y..,. '� - .. t�,
-All,� �olrt�er:.:.re�ideati$1 -propertfeg ��11 receive a :�eredit up to the firet .
�-'�.�:���a�t :nf---�ep�cr reeonstucted side�al.k a3.o�g and ahut�iag the "lang
"`�idep�:o�'t"he�-�gr`ogerty. q.
,, _ . �:�.; _:_ , . � ; • ��" �
COMMExCIAL rates (sll propertq athe# than resideatiai) -- � 4
IOO� of actual c t r s t e s t ima te d ta be �app�ozimately $4.OQ per square �
foat "of �al� c�oastructed. " : : `
, , � •. -., . t/ - `. . ;.:_
. : ... _ _ ,.. � -�o -y� `
� under Preliminary Order �� �a �� apprqved �
_ _ �. �
� .�:'The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice ;
thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and :� _ "
_ _ .` . :� � �
- . : WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve-
ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it . > '
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement
be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
. FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate
all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. _;
COIJNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date J�� '2 6 �g�Q `
Yea�imond . Nays . :;. . :;
,,
. ��j�y `, - . Certified Passed by Council Secretary � `
. - �n8 `. � �- . � < ;. ' ;'
, �48CCSbeB � In Favor By � '
_ R$�ttman �. �
� � Against .
Kilson _ Mayor
� � .x• RE 7/27/90 �v ���D� /�- �,
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N� _10 8 3 4
Finance Department/Real Estate 7/26/90 GREEN SHEET
INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Peter White 298-5317 ASSION �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR ❑BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&Mf3T.BERVICE3 DIR.
M'uST BE Q,N� COUNCIL A(iENDA BY DATE�1 ROUTING
1`1U3t De in city cf erK�S 0 ice 110 ORDER �MAYOR(OR A3SISTANn 0 Council R
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION RE�UESTED:
On 7/26/90. Council decided to lay this project over for further discussion. It will be
rescheduled to come before the full council on 8/9/90. For sidewalk reconstruction on
North side W Ivy Ave from N Victoria to E Como Blvd. File 59060 See Attached Green Sheet
RECOMMENDA710NS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS:
_PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contrect for this dep8rtment?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
A STnFF _ 2• Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
— YES NO
_ DISTRIC7 COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVEI YES NO
Explaln all yes answars on separats shost and attach to greon sh�et
INITIATINCi PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
ADVANTAOE3 IF APPROVED:
DISADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED:
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
RE�f_IVF�
��L3119��
.fY CLEk�
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) 1 �
Q
.. q '
�
NOTE: CQMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER: 5
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCII RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Cferk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperoNp or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented betore any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
. , . � �,�o'�3�a
� .
DEPARTMEkTlOFFICFJCOUNCII 9733
? Publ'�c Works Sidewalks 4/�s� GREEN SHE No.
;.: CaYTACT PEASON a P►+ONE � ����
�D�AR'TNBFi OfRECTOR CtiY COUNC�
°;� Thomas P. Keefe-292-6283 �� ❑anr��r�ow�Y crrrc�c
,� ::::._ *BE ON COUNCIL AGENOA BY(�AT� �S I1 Z O �� �BUO(iET DIRECTOH �FN.a YGT.SEAVK�3 DIA.
' �__cerb�han noo�i ��dnes�aof� �6 �S �►�+ta+�ss�sra� Counci(Research
- TOTAL�!OF SiGNATURE PAGES 1 (CUP ALL LOCATfON3 FOR 31GNATUR
` ACT10N REQUES7E0
Reconstruct Old �efective Sideaalk in Ward 5 (See attached list)
".�
�; File ��'s 59058, thru 59060
,, pF('AMMENOATION3:ApprOVe(A)0�R�ct(H) COUNCIL COYMffTEFJRESEARCH REPOH'T OPTIONA
_PLNVNING C�MMISSION _CIV�SERVICE COMIMISSION ANALYST PF�N0.
CIB CAMMITTEE _
A coMM�7s
_STAFF __
_DISTRICT COUNCIL .
` SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCiI 08JECTIVE4 Ward 5
INITIATING PNOBLEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(WHO,WHAT,WHEN,NMERE.WHY):
The probiem"defective sidewaik"was created because of tree roots,deteterious subgrade materiai, alternating freeze/thaw
cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and
must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected,the sidewalk conditio�would worsen to a state where it
would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
: ApVANTAGE3 IF APPROVED:
;: The community will benefit from this project because it wiN provide safe defect free sidewalks for its many citizerts. The sidewalk
;�: !racts are executed by private contractors,so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
�:.
��
.,,
:�
� OISAOVANTAGES IF APPHOVED:
� Historically,the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedbadc in the area of construdion procedure and assessment.
�- Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
temains controversial.
`�' DISADVANTACiE51FNOTAPPROVEO:
�. This option would allow the irifrastructure of sidewalk stockto deteriorate,which in tum,wilt generate more personal injury suits,
� uftimatery resulting in the expenditure of targer dolla�amouMs in eventual repairs and/or replacement,as we11 as claim payouts.
3..:
� >L AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S �3,09 5.�Q
COST/NEVENUE BUOGETED(dRCLE ON� `ES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 9�'M-o659 A. PfA = 404.�� AC(TVRYNUMBER A220� �OZ� �
FINANCIAIINFOFMATION:(EXPLAIM B. AST = 'fO�F�OOO
C. CIB = 50,000