The URL can be used to link to this page

90-1318 J. LAID OVER 1 WEEK TILL AUGUST 2, 1990 �� ciTV oF sT. Pau� COUNCIL FILE NO. %d I�IO FINAL ORDER By File No. S9057 Voting In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction and/or construction at the following Ward location: 5 S9057 Both sides W Iowa Avenue from N Lexington Parkway to N Dunlap Street under Preliminary Order 90-804 approved �� .QT��on The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve- ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau] does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date AUG 2 1990 t Yeas Dimond Nays Goswitz Certified Pa ed by Council Secretary Long Maccabee In Favor By Rettman Thune � Against Wilson Mayor au� z r9so pUBIiSNED p�� 1 11990 RE 7 27 90 � � � �� . � � � / / (� � Finance�Department/Real Estate DA7�26�9� GREEN SHEET 1�� -10833 INITIAVDATE INITIAUDATE CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Peter �llte 298-53ll �ssiGe �CITYATfORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE O COUNCIL AGENDA BY ATE) ROUTING �BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MOT.SERVICE3 DIR. MLLSt �e in City C�erk's C2 IIO ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTAN� � ('O iri -�7 R later than noon Wednesda 8 1 90 TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: On 7/26/90, Council decided to lay this project over for further discussion, It will be rescheduled to come before the full council on 8/2/90. For sidewalk reconstruction on both sides W Iowa Avenue from N Lexington Parkway to N Dunlap Street File S9057. SeAttchedG Se RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINti QUESTIONS: _PLANNINd COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for thia department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? A—STAFF — YES NO _DI37RIC7 COUaT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answera on separate sheet and attech to grsen shest INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: DI3ADVANTACiE3 IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPHOVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDOETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) a. , � . NOTE: CQMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council 6. Finance and Management Ser�ices Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Cterk TOTAL NUMBER OF StGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperciip or flag each of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body,public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LiST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the citys tiability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? . . . � o�1�-1� RE S 2 90 U� �,�„�,�� u . -- �,b��wo�s�a�� an�rso CREEN SHE No. 9729 `� corrt,�c7 a�t�a a►+o� wR'�10'�� =. Thomas P. Keefe-292-6283 �� ❑�� i� �CfTY ATiOfNEY �CITY CLEFBC ts; -:::�r eE on,couvcn.�aaron er�� 5/1 90 "01T1N° ❑�*� ❑�.:►iar.�aa. �' �� ..�st be in City Clerk s Of �R �YOR�� Council Research '� ;' TOTAL�OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (qJP ALL LOCA�FOR SIGNATUR '� -�. �cnoN�cues�a Consttud�Reconstnx:t Oid Defedive SidewaNc�Ward 5(See attadted�Stj File �'s S9055 thru S9057 ':� a��a►r�ars:�owo»tw p�+c�► cowrd�cawrrr�aES�►pa+a�aoar o�o�u► � _PLANNRrQ C�IMISSION _CNII SERVICE C01AM�SION ANIILYST PFqNE NO. 3 _C18 COMMRTEE _ " A STAPF _ COMMENTS .,� _DISTRICT COUNCII e s: suPPOaTSw►+�+couNC�oerccrnr�z Ward 5 `� INtf1ATING PROBLEM.ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY ryYF10.WHAT.NMEN.WHERE.NNIIiiY): 'R> The problem"defective sidewa�c"was created because of tree roots,deleterious subgrade material, aftemating freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits,chemical additives, e�reme temperature variations, eta These problems occur on a citywide level and - must be addressed and coRected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewatk condition would worsen to a state where it `� would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. - r� ADYANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its marry citizens. The sidewalk . i ntracts are executed by private contracto�s, so it follows that private sector pbs are created as a resuli of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPIiOVEO: . Historically,the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property ow�ers detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains co�rtroversial. DISADVANTAf3ES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would albw the infrastructure of sidewa�c stodc to deteriorate,whieh in tum,will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resufting in the expenditu�e of larger dollar amourrts in eventual repairs and/or replacemerrt, as well as claim payouts. � �. . ; �' �OTAL AAAOUNT OF TRANSACTION t 4 5,82 3.00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETEO idRCLE ON� rES No - FUNDINGSOURCE 9�'M-0659 A. PIA = 464,0�� AGTY�TYNUMBER A22��-�2�5� FINANCIAL INFOiiMATION:(EXPI.AIM B. AS T = 20 ,000 C. CIB a 202,000