90-1051 0 R i G I N A L " Council File # ��"/o�� -
Green Sheet � 8 811
RESOLUTION �,
OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �
� �
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
RESOLVED, That upon execution and delivery of a release in full to
the City, in a form to be approved by the City Attorney, the proper
City officers are hereby authorized and directed to pay out of the
Tort Liability Fund, 09070-0511, to: Michael O'Rourke and Crum and �
Forster Insurance Company the sum of $1,707.23 in full settlement
of their claim of damages sustained on or about April 12 , 1990, as
more particularly set out in the Notice of Claim filed in the City
Clerk's office on May 15, 1990.
Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of:
imon ��
oswitz —�
on � City Attorney
acca ee – �—
et man —�—
une �—
z son —� By'
Adopted by Council: Date J�N +�+ 6 1990 Form Approved by City Attorney
��
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary gy:
BY� Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
Approved by Mayor: Date (o 0�7 90 •
r
By, JUN 2 7 1990 BY=
PUBDSNEO J U L 7 1990
G�r�' q� -i0s�
DEPARTM[NT/OfFICEICOUNqL ` DATE INITIATED
cit Attorney 6-4-90 GREEN SHEET No. $$����A�
CONTACT PERSON 6 PNONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITV COUNCIL
P e t e r P n b o r n 2 9 8-5 4 7 5 �� ❑CITV AITORNEY pTY G'IERK
MUBT BE ON COUNCII AOENDA BV(DAT� ROUTINO �BUDOET OIRECTOFI g fIN.8 MOT.9ERVICEB WR.
�MAYOR(OR AS813TANn �
TOTAL A�OF 81tiNATURE PAtiE$ 1 (CLIP AL�LOCATIONS FOR StQIVATURE)
ACT10N RE�UESTEO:
Resolution approving the settlement of a claim against City of Saint Paul
by Michael 0' Rourke and Crum and Forster Insurance Company
REOOMMENDATIONS:MP►�(N a�1�(p) COUNdL COM REPORT OPTIONAL
ANALYBT PHONE N0.
_PLANNINfi OOMMIS810N _(YVIL SERVICS t�MMISSION .
_p8 OOMMITiEE _
_STAFF _ COMMENTS:
—DIBTRIC'T(.bURT _
SUPPORTS WNICH COUNdL O&JECTIVE?
INITIATINCi PROBLEM,188UE.OPPORTUNITY(Who,Wh��WMn�Whe►e.Why):
On April 11 , 1990,claimant , Michael O' Rourke' s , 1983 Ford Van was.�d�maged
by debris falling from the Wabasha Street Bridge. The falling debris was
the direct result of repair work being performed at that time on the side-
walks on the Wabasha Bridge by the Saint Paul Public Works Bridge Division .
Mr. O' Rourke' s van sustained damaged in the amount of $1 , 707.23ewhich was
paid, less his $50.00 , deductible by his insurance company, Crum and
Forster Insurance Company .
ADVANTAOEB IF APPROVED:
�ECElNE�
: Jl.lf� 061990
a��,�8��:
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT I�PROVED:
���
��N13��0 �our�ci� Researcn �:ehY�r.
JUN 0 7 �yy�
CITY t'.I.ERK w���
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION = 1 r,7 n 7 _ 7� C08T/REVENUE 01lOOETED(CIRCLE ON� YE8 NO
�N�p�� T o r t L i ab i l i t y �crrvm Nu�p 0 9 0 7 0-O S 1 1
FINANGAI INFORAAAT�N:(EXPL.AIN)
dw
_ . _
NOTE: OOMPLETE DIRECTIONB ARE INCIUDED IN THE GREEN 8HEET IN8TRi1CTtONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASINti OFFICE(PH�NE NO.�S).
ROUTINO dRDER: _
Below ars preferred routinga for the flve most frequent typss of documsrits:
CONTRACTS (assumes authorizad COUNCII RESOLUTION (Amsnd,Bdgb./
budpet exists) Accspt.C3raMS)
1. Outefds Agency 1. Dspartment Director
2. IMtlating Dopautment 2. Bud�st Director
3. Gty Attorney 3. dry Attomey
4, Mayor 4. MayoNAseistant
5. Ffnanr��Mpmt Svcs. Dir�ctor 5. .qty Council
8. Flnance Accountin� 8. Chisf AccountaM,`Fln�Mgmt 3vca.
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budpet COUNCIL RE30LUTION (all othsrs)
Rwision) and ORDINANCE
1. Activity Manapsr 1. Inftlatinp DepeRm�rK Dinctor
2. Dsputm�M Accournant 2. qy Attome�r
3. Dep�Rment Dlncta 3. M�yor//►aistant
4. Budpet DI►eCtor 4. City Couhdl
5. Gty qsrk
8. Chief AocouMant� Fln d�Mpmt Svca.
ADMINI3TRATIVE ORDERS (all athsrs)
1. Initiatiny Dsputrtant
2. City Attomsy
3. MayoNA►seistant
4. dty Cderk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIONATURE PAQES
Indicate the�of p�ea on wh�h�uros us roquirod and papsrclip
Mch ot thess os.
ACTION REOUESTED
Ds�cribs what ths proj�ct/nqusn eNks to�ocompNsh In Nthsr chro�ologl-
cal ordsr or order M imporqu�os,whfchsv�r is rtwst approp�iate for tha
issue. Do not w�ft.oomple�a ssnt.nctis. Bsgin wch itsm in your Ilat with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Compl�te if the is�w in qusstion has besn proseMed beforo eny body, publ�
or private.
SUPPORT3 WHICN COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Coundl abJsctlw(s)Y��P�'Q1�reQuest suppoRS by listing
the ksy word(s)(HOU3ING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOOD8, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDOET,SEWER 3EPARATION).(3EE COMPLE?E LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
COUNqL COMMITTEEJRESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS RE�UE3TED BY OOUNCIL
INITIATINCi PROBLEM, IS3UE,OPPORTUNITY
Expl�in the situation or conditiona that Croated a nesd for your project
or requeat.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicats whether thb is simply an annwl budpM procedure nquired by lawt
chaRer or whsthsr there are specif� in which tlw City of SaiM Paul
and its aitizens will bsnotit from thia p��t/action. .
DISADVANTACiE3 IF APPROVED
What nspative Miscts or major chan�ss to oxisdng or past procsssea might
this projecUreque�prodtx�ff it is patesd(e.g.,t►afflc del,nya� noise,
tax incroases or ass�qunents)?To VlfhomT When?For haw long?
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED
WF�t wfll be the nspative c�nssquer�ces if the promised action is not
approv�d4 InabiUty to dsli�se�vice4 ConNnued high traffic, noise,
axident rats?Las of rsvonue?
FINANqAL IMPACT
Althouph you must taibr the information you provide here to the iseue you
are addrossinp, in gsnaral you must answer two qu�ia�s: How much ia ft
9oiiW to cost?Who is�oln9 to PeY?
, F�,� �-�� U� ;. �����,; .,�
�- �r�, ;� -�
� A � �� � � . ���
������ � � counc i t F i l e # �`����� � . ���
i
Green Sheet # ���d"
RESOLUTION ,- -- .,
CITY SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ,' ��
, , .
Presented By
Referred T Camii ttee: Date
1 RESOLVED, that the current licenseholder for Everybody's Bar at 369 Cedar Street, Saint
2 Paul, which is Limelight, Inc., is hereby required to pay to the City of Saint Paul a fine of $500.00,
3 which fine is in lieu of a two-day suspension of all of the licenses held at that premises, said fine to
4 be paid within ten (10) days following publication of this resolution; and be it
5
6 FURTHER RESOLVED, that such fine may be paid by Jescrco, Inc., the current managers �of
7 the establishment; and be it
8
9 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the owners, managers and employees of the licensed
10 establishment, including all Jescrco, Inc., personnel, shall meet with the city licensing division to
11 review the rules and ordinances governing the operation of on sale intoxicating liquor
12 establishments, said meeting to be initiated by written request from Jescrco, Inc., to the License
13 Inspector within ten (10) days following publication of this Resolution; and be it
14
15 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the report of the ALJ dated May 21, 1990, with its Findings
16 and Fact, and Conclusions of Law, is expressly ratified and adopted as the written findings and
17 conclusions of the Council.
18
19 This resolution is based on the record of proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge,
20 including the hearing on May 9, 1990, the documents and exhibits introduced therein, the arguments
21 and statements for the parties on June 14, 1990, and the deliberations of the Council in open
22 session. The Report of the ALJ is attached hereto.
23
24 A copy of this resolution, as adopted, shall be sent by first class mail to the Administrative
25 Law Judge, and to the licenseholder.
26
27
28
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------- ------- ------ ---------
Yeas Na s Absent Requested by Department of:
Dimon
Goswttz
Lon
Macca ee
Rettman
Thune
Wi son BY�
v
Adopted by Council: Date J�� � � ��J� Form Approved by City Attorney
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary BY: ' ��/��yb
BY° �"'�"�\ Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Approved by Mayor: Date (�p p� Q Council
�UN ? '' 1990
BY� ,��,�t�.� ���1 BY
PUB1lSHED J U L 7 1990
TO CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE:
❑ FINANCE,MANAGEMENT&PERSONNEL
❑ HOUSING&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
❑ HOUSING&REOEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
❑ HUMAN SERVICE�,REGULATED INDUSTRIES,
AND RULES AND POLICY
❑ INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
❑ NEIGHBORHOODSERVICES
❑ PUBLIC WORKS, UTII.ITIES 8 TRANSPORTATION
❑ ACTION
❑ OTHER
DATE
FROM
, : , , � �0��S-�.
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED NO ,10 5 9 8
Finance/License GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PERSON d PHONE INITIAVDATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Kris Van Horn/298-5056 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR.
ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN'n
CONSENT AGENDA 6/26/90 ❑ ❑
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ncrioNRecauesTeo: License-Adverse Action
Resolution represents action taken by the Council during public hearing on June 14, 1990.
Hearfng on June 14, 1990. Must be on Council agenda of 6/26/90.
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ PLANNINO COMMISSION _ CIVIL sERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
_CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO
_STAFF _ 2• Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
YES NO
_ DIS7RICT COURT _ 3. Does this personlfirm possess a skill not normall
y possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE9 YES NO
Explain all yes answen on separate sheet and attach to gnen shset
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
License Adverse Action
ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED:
DISADVANTAOES IFAPPROVED:
DISAOVANTA(3ES IF NOT APPROVED:
��c��v��
JUN 18i990
Cl��'s' CLE�CK
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S � COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) +�
v
NOTE: COMPtETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Marragement Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. Ciry Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved?Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
, , �"9U-/0.5a.
_ ���_� o, - CITY OF SAINT PAUL
�;�' �; DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE�AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES
��: j j e'
� ^ DIVISION OF LtCENSE AND PERMIT ADMINISTRATION
�... ts W Kellogg
Room 203, Ciry Hall
�AMES SCHEIBEi REC��V�� Saint Paut,Minnesota 55102
MAYOR June 15, 1990 Alartn Permits 612-29&5143
JUN 191990 Building Contractor Licenses 612-29&5144
Business Licenses 612-298-5056
�:I i'� CLE�i�
Ms. Marie V. Glidewell, President
Limelight Inc.
d/b/a Everybody's
Mr. Perry D. Miller, President
Jescrco, Inc.
d/b/a Everybody's
369 Cedar Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
RE: City of St. Paul vs. Limelight, Inc. and Jescrco, Inc.
d/b/a Everybody's
Dear Ms. Glidewell & Mr. Miller:
Enclosed please find a copy of the written form of the resolution
adopted in its verbal form during the public hearing of June 14, 1990,
in the above referenced matter. The resolution will be placed on the
Council agenda for June 26, 1990.
I anticipate publication of the resolution on July 7, I990, which means
that your fine must be paid by July 17, 1990. You must also submit by
July 17, 1990, a written request to initiate the required meeting
contained in paragraph three of the resolution.
Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
; ` .�
������-
�,�
Robert Ressler
Acting License Division Maaager
RK/lk
Enclosure
cc: �t:.,:,@�a��:=;�6�#�;,,:�3,a�c�v
Lt. Nancy DiPerna, Vice
Phil Bqrne, Assistaat City Attorney
Lance Boulter, Minnesota Liquor Control Board