The URL can be used to link to this page

90-985 � R �� NA� �ounci l Fi le # �J<' ' Green Sheet # ,J �� RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA �, �� ; �--- �. �u Presented By - Referred To / Committee: Date ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO CITYWALK PARKING RAMP WHEREAS, in March 1981 the Port Authority financed the City Wa1k parking Ramp under a financing lease with TGA, Inc., upon property conveyed by the HRA for development of the Ramp by TGA, Inc., and the City Walk Condominiums by Ted Glasrud Associates; WHEREAS, the City has operated 502 spaces in the Ramp under sublease with TGA, Inc., which sublease was assigned to the Port Authori�y by TGA, Inc., and by terms of a Development Agreement between the City, HRA and Ted Glasrud Associates committed to maintain certain spaces available to Condominium owners and for retail customers of BCE Development, which agreement was supplemented as to the parking commitments by a Supplemental Agreement between the City, HRA, Ted Glasrud Associates and Port Authority; WHEREAS, the Port Authority proposes to terminate the financing lease, sublease and to sell the Ramp to a general partnership to be formed by Richard C. Hawk ("Partnership"), under terms of which sale the Partnership would reserve 200 parking spaces for use of HEMAR Inc., employees and customers and hold the remaining spaces available to the public; and WHEREAS, their have been presented to this meeting agreements (1) in which the City represents to the Partnership that the Downtown People Mover, for which an easement was reserved, has been formally abandoned, and the Partnership commits to reserve 302 stalls of the City Walk Parking Ramp for public parking, and (2) by which the City sublease is terminated; and WHEREAS, the Partnership commitment respecting reservation of stalls for public parking consists of the following: (a) The Partnership shall guarantee that not less than 302 stalls shall be retained for general public parking use for the greater of(i) seven years from the date of closing of the sale of the ramp, or (ii) the term that the Port Authority bonds financing the sale are outstanding; (b) The City Walk Ramp shall continue to be operated as a commercial parking facility with sufficient short term/visitor spaces maintained to satisfy on-going demand with a minimum of 30 spaces maintained for this purpose; and (c) The City Walk Ramp will continue reduced parking rate policies for evenings for evenings and weekends, and shall cooperate with the City and civic organizations in promotional programs and activities involving downtown parking facilities; now therefore, be it OR � GINAL � � �'�°��-� ' 1tESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul that the City Walk Agreement and Sublease " Ter`mination Agreement in form as approved by the City Attomey are hereby approved and the proper City officers are authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City of Saint Paul. RESO�,VED, That the City Walk Agreement disclosing the actual purchase price of the parking ramp shall be provided to the County Tax Assessor so that tax assessments for the ramp will be in keeping with the actual value of the property. ---------------------------------------- --------------- ------- ------ --------- Yeas Na s Absent Requested by Department of: Dimon � Goswitz Lon Macca v Rettman T une �. Q�� J Nt son BY� _________________�___—______—_________ Adopted by Co�r�cil: Date JU L 1 2 1990 Form Appr by City �Attorney Adoption Certified by Council Secretary B : /�/ Y By' � A rov b Ma r JUL 16 1990 � Y y� for S�,SS,�, to Approved by Mayor: Date C�� ,--� , ;, f„ � � /�1�ys"Z'� By: By: � pjIBUS'�iEO J U L 21 �980 TO CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE: ❑ FiNANCE,MANAGEMENT&PERSONNEL ❑ HOUSING&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ❑ HOUSING&REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ❑ HUMAN SERVICE�,REGULATED INDUSTRIES, AND RULES AND POLICY ❑ INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ❑ NEIGHBORHOODSERVICES ❑ PUBLI WORKS,UTILITIES&TRANSPORTATION ACTION ❑ OTHER DATE � FROM : �.�o -�� ,- DE�ARTM[NT/OFFICE/COUNqI DATE INITIATED ' PED 5/24/90 GREEN SHEET No. $��0 IrNTIAU DATE INITIAUDATE OONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNGL Pau 1 Lapoi nte x3339 �� CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK MUBT BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY(DAT� ROUTINO BUDf3ET DIRECTOR �FIN.3 MOT.SERVICES DIR. �MAYOR(OR A8818TANT) � TOTAL#�OF SIONATURE PAGiEB (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ��,E�: � 1990 Signature on attached resolutionJ �''e �� " ! �A��R,��FG�E RECOMMENDATIONB:ADD►ove(A)o►Rel�(� COtlNCN.�b1NAITTEEJRESEARCN l�PORT OPTIONAL _PIANNINC3 COMMISSION _pVIL SERVIC�COMMISSION A�YST PNONE N0. _pB COMMIITEE _ COMMENTS: _STAFF _ _asrAicr oouar — �1PPORTS WHICH COUNqL OBJECTIVE4 INITIATIN(i PROBLEM.188UE�OPPORTUNITY(WHw�N�h�t�Whsn�WMre�MII�. Attached is a draft Council Resolution that needs to be signed by PED, Executive Director and Mayor for introduction to Council. The Resolution is worded in general language and after the Housing and Economic Development Committee has considered sp�cific public parking conditions it wishes to address, the resolution can be revised. AD1dWTAOEB IF APPROVED: Rllow Resolution to proceed through committee for review. as�v�uvr�aES��aaROVEO: N/A DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: N/A ,:•..�:,�:� �i�::;�atC:�1 1.t�rrle�fr MAY 31� .__ � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION = COST/I�VENUE StlDGETED(CIRCLE O�IEj YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUM6ER flNANpAL INFORMATION:(EXPWN) - _.� ��J, ��-✓.� . D ,� .,' 9�i�,��ae��. . CITY OF SAIl'�1�' PAUL 4FFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL-7ih FLOOR-SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 •• 612-298-550G TOM DIMOND COUNCILMEMBER Members: Tom Dimond, Chair Paula Maccabee Dave Thune Date: July 11, 1990 COMMITTEE REPORT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Housing and Economic Development meetings for: June 13, 1990; June 22, 1990; June 27, 1990; and June 28, 1990. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 2. Sibley Apartments (Galtier Plaza} -- Redevelopment Company contract terms (Property Tax Abatement) (Laid Over in HED on 6/27/90) . THIS ITEM WILL BE LAID OVER TO THE JULY 25, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOIMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. � u ion 90-985 -- Resolution Approving Agreements with Respect to City Walk Parking Ramp -- Request for the Termination of Sublease between TGA, Inc. , and the City of Saint Paul on the City Walk Parking Ramp (Laid Over in HED on 6/27/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED 4. Authorization to Expend Rehab Initiative -- Code Enforcement Fund (Laid Over in HED on 6/27/90) . NO COMMITTEE ACTION REQUIRED -- DISCUSSED IN HRA 5. Resolution 90-1017 -- Resolution Approving the Comprehensive Homeless Assistance Plan and Directing that it be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AS AMENDED, WITH AN ADDITIONAL RESOLUTION TO FOLLOW, 3-0 Chair, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, ,��''� Committees: Public Works; Housing and Economic Development; Finance. � 100%Recycleabte ��5 HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT - JULY 11, 1990 PAGE TWO 6. Budget Goals and Policies (Laid Over on 6/27/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF ITEMS AS AMENDED, AND LAID OVER ITEMS F-17 AND F-35, 3-0. 7. Third & Maria Redevelopment Plan (Laid Over on 6/27/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL FO THE PLAN, 3-0 8. Lower Dayton's Bluff/40 Acre Study (Laid Over on 6/27/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PLAN, 3-0 9. Authorization to Schedule a Public Hearing for Issueance of Nursing Home Facilities Revenue bonds for Acquisition and Improveemnt of Lynnhurst Nursing Home, District 13. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 (HRA) 10. Authorization to Accept MHFA Urban and Rural Homestead Program Funding, and authorization to enter into a Management Contract with the Thomas/Dale District 7 Planning Council (Referred from HRA 6/26/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 (HRA) 11. Commit UDAG Funding for Home Improvement Energy Loans. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 (HRA) 12. Mary Hall . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH AMENDMENTS, 3-0 (HRA) 13. Chargo Printing -- Enterprise Zone Credits. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 14. 7 Corners Hardware -- Enterprise Zone Credits. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 chr �`�� ' � • p RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul that the City Walk Agreement and Sublease T'ermination Agreement in form as approved by the City Attorney are hereby approved and the proper City officers are authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City of Saint Paul. . .. ��ESo�Vr�� 'I�,� �t C,�t� U,/�t,l� /�� GI:t�Cos 'C1�F a� w�,�,.«+� � 't'1�� ►� r � 1�"�'�•� '�'� ,M,��1 r _ � � p �ess�� " fi„' r��' C�,�,,,,�,,, I a��c ��$w so 'h�� -t'� � __ __ _� • � � ac.{�-.� v«� � . bd �� t� �~� `'� - ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- ------- ------ ------- --------------- ------- ------ --------- Yeas Na s Absent Requested by Department of: Dimon Goswtti Lon Macca e Rettman Wi son By° '^� ` , ---------------------------------------- Form Appr by ity �Attorney Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary / 8y: BY� Approv by Mayor for Subnission to Council Approved by Mayor: Date By: By: . . _ �� ' Council File # Green Sheet # RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA - - - r Presented By - Referred To � Comnittee: Date =e e e==e e=v e e e e=e v o-c e=e e=e==e-=v==e=____=e e v�s�=e v v=e e e=a�a e e ve e v e e a e�a==a v e m-a=e�e e==e m= RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS WI RESPECT TO CITYWALK PARKING RAMP WHEREAS, in March 1981 the Port Authority financed the City W parking Ramp under a f'inancing lease with TGA, Inc., upon property conveyed by the H for development of the Ramp by TGA, Inc., and the City Walk Condominiums by Ted Glasrud sociates; WHEREAS, the City has operated 502 spaces in the Ramp und sublease with TGA, Inc., which sublease was assigned to the Port Authority by TGA, Inc., and y terms of a Development Agreement between the City, HRA and Ted Glasrud Associat committed to maintain certain spaces available to Condominium owners and for retail custo ers of BCE Development, which agreement was supplemented as to the parking commitments y a Supplemental Agreement between the City, HRA, Ted Glasrud Associates and Port A thority; WHEREAS, the Port Authority proposes to terminate the nancing lease, sublease and to sell the Ramp to a general partnership to be formed by Richard C Hawk ("Partnership"), under terms of which sale the Partnership would reserve 200 parking spa s for use of HEMAR Inc., employees and customers and hold the remaining spaces available to the public; and WHEREAS, their have been presented to this meeting a reements (1) in which the City represents to the Partnership that the Downtown People Mover, fo which an easement was reserved, has been formally abandoned, and the Partnership commits to res rve 302 stalls of the City Walk Parking Ramp for public parking, and (2) by which the City sub ase is terminated; and WHEREAS, the Partnership commitment respecting re ervation of stalls for public parking consists of the following: (a) The Partnership shall guarantee that not less than 302 stalls shall be retained for general public parking use for the reater of(i) seven years from the date of closing of the sale of the ramp, or ii) the term that the Port Authority bonds financing the sale are outstanding; (b) The City Walk Ramp shall continu to be operated as a commercial parking facility with sufficient short term/ 'sitor spaces maintained to satisfy on-going demand with a minimum of 30 sp ces maintained for this purpose; and (c) The City Walk Ramp will continu reduced parking rate policies for evenings for evenings and weekends, and shall ooperate with the City and civic organizations in promotional programs and acti ies involving downtown parking facilities; now therefore, be it O��G i 1V Q L �ounci l Fi le # 9� -9�J� Green Sheet # J` S O .__, RESOLUTION i` �'� CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � ��" � _.__�. Presented By �Referred To C.LG�' - ��-tJ - Committee: Date (� -S"� C� 1 2 RESO UTION APROVING AGREEMENTS WITH 3 RESPE TO CITYWALK PARKING RAMP 4 5 WHEREAS, in March 1981 the ort Authority financed the City Walk parking Ramp under a 6 financing lease with TGA, Inc., u on property conveyed by the HRA for development of the Ramp 7 by TGA, Inc., and the City Walk ndominiums by Ted Glasrud Associates; 8 9 WHEREAS, the City has operated 50 spaces in the Ramp under sublease with TGA, Inc., which 10 sublease was assigned to the Port Auth 'ty by TGA, Inc., and by terms of a Development 11 Agreement between the City, HRA and d Glasrud Associates committed to maintain certain 12 spaces available to Condominium owners a d for retail customers of BCE Development, which 13 agreement was supplemented as to the parki commitments by a Supplemental Agreement 14 between the City, HRA, Ted Glasrud Associat s and Port Authority; 15 , 16 WHEREAS, the Port Authority proposes to term�iate the financing lease, sublease and to sell the 17 Ramp to a general partnership to be formed by Ri�ard C. Hawk ("Partnership"), under terms of 18 which sale the Partnership would reserve 200 parkin spaces for use of HEMAR Inc., employees 19 and customers and hold the remaining spaces availabl to the public; and 20 21 WHEREAS, their have been presented to this meeting a reements (1) in which the City represents 22 to the Partnership that the Downtown People Mover, for ich an easement was reserved, has been 23 formally abandoned, and the Partnership commits to reserv 302 stalls of the City Walk Parking 24 Ramp for public parking, and (2) by which the City sublease ' terminated; now therefore, be it 25 � \ ,. 'l t .,1�G� ��:�- 1 Q ��l GI�NAL '�=�° - ��s 2 RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Saint Paul that the City Walk Agreement and Sublease 3 Termination Agreement in form as approved by the City Attorney are hereby approved and the 4 proper City officers are authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City of Saint Paul. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 `,� '.'\ � '�, .\�, ,` .. , . _------------------------------------------------------------. -------------------------------�_____________________________ --------------- ------- ------ --------- Yeas Na s Absent Requested by D nt of: Dimon Goswitz Lon Macca e Rettman e T une gY: I'��j r,��• � �� Wi son Form Approv by City torney Adopted by Co�cil: Date Adoption Certified by Council Secretary BY, � BY° Approv by Mayor for Submission to Approved by Mayor: Date Council ,�• BY: �� By: � F. # ,: Er.:� t ; .. � j «, �j j � f..�'rf ••i Z...' '� • � �.. . , �� o_�'�'s� ��=r o.� ��* .� CITY OF SAINT PAUL � �i�� ;� OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY + � . "" JANE A. MC PEAK, CITY ATTORI�tEY 647 City Hall,Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 612-298-5121 JAMES SCHEIBEL FAX 612-298-5619 MAYOR May 24, 1990 To: Paul LaPointe Fr: Jim Hart Re: City Walk Ramp City Council Resolution Enclosed is a draft Council Resolution which needs to be signed by Warren and the Mayor' for introduction. In the normal process it would then be delivered to the City Clerk to be placed on the Council agenda. However time may not permit this, and, if he is agreeable, have Councilmember Tom Dimond introduce it under suspension of rules. The resolution is worded in genneral language. When the Housing and Economic Development Committee has considered the specific public parking conditions it wishes to attach, the resolution can be revised. . . ��.-- �� A ' ��a��,��;,�� r' . CI'TY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL-7th FI..00R-SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55102 � 612-298-5506 TOM DIMOND COUNCILMEMBER Members: Tam Dimond, Chair Paula Maccabee Dave Thune Date: June 27, 1990 COMMITTEE REPORT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1J � Resolution 90-409 -- Resolution adopting the Economic Development Strategy as part of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan (Laid Over in Committee 6/13/90) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, AS THE PLAN WAS AMENDED, 3-0 2. Sibley Apartments (Galtier Plaza) -- Redevelopment Company contract Terms (Property Tax Abatement) (Referred from HRA 5/22/90; Laid Over in Committee 6/13/90) . THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 3. equest for the Termination of Sublease between TGA, Inc. , and the City o Saint Paul on the City Walk Parking Ramp (Referred from HRA 5/22/90; Laid Over in Committee 6/13/90) . . THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND EEONOMI DEYELQPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AND WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 12, 199 CITY COUNCIL MEETI G 4. Authorization to Expend Rehab Initiative -- Code Enforcement Fund (Referred from HRA on 5/22/90; Laid Over in Committee 6/13/90) . COMMI- � -- COMMENDED APPROVAL AS AMENDED, 3-0 AND WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE ��JULY 12, 1990, ITY COUNCIL MEETING 5. Review of Comprehensive Home Assistance Program. THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC.__�:�.w� DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AND WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR TH� JULY 12, 1990, ; CITY COUNCIL MEETING �� Chair, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Committees: Public Works; Housing and Economic Development; Finance. te'�S 100yo Recycleable HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT - JUNE 27, 1990 PAGE TWO 6. Third and Maria Redevelopment Plan Recommendations. THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 7. Lower Dayton's Bluff 40 Acre Study/Small Area Plan. THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 8. Highwood Plan. f;,�.�� e�tY`��-~'�� U COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PLAN AS AMENDED, 3-0 9. Budget Goals and Policies. THIS ITEM WAS LAID OVER TO THE JULY 11, 1990, HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 10. Resolution 90-1010 -- Additional C.D. Funding for Single Family Rehab Program. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 chr tQ ��GI�NAL _ Council File ,� �� '�J��P Green Sheet � `�� RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA G I Presented By Referred To Committee: Date BE IT RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the acti.on of the Property Code Enforcement Board (Saint Paul Poard of Appeals and Review) pertaining to the following lis'ted pro�erty and as shown by the Excerpted Minutes of said �ro;�erty Code Enforcement Board, and dated April 10 , 1990 and m�rkeci EXHIBIT A, and attached hereto and made a part hereof by ?��rerence : DATE OF BOARD . MINUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT G-10-90 29-90-R 1897 LaCrosse Ave. Dennis G. Olson BOARD ACTION: Granted a variance from the code requirement pertaining to disconnection of rainleader. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Hazel Park Division 2 Ex W 2 ft Lot 29 and all of Lot 30 Blk 1 ------------------------------------------------- 4-10-90 25-90-H 103 Cleveland Rve . S . Michael Marinovich BOARD ACTIN: Granted a variance from code requirement pertaining to light in cellar sleeping room; cellar egress window size in sleeping room; cellar living room ceiling height and living room light and ventilation. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Groveland addition to St. Paul , Ramsey County Minnesota Lot 5 Blk 3 --------------------------------------------- ✓� � ��l��l� �� Qr G.R 1�G 1 N A L �`- �� _ �� DATE OF BOARD MINUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 4-10-90 27-90- F 62 Dale St . S . MaNLEY Madson, Jr. BOARD ACTION: Granted a variance from the requirement of having to provide deadbolt locks (1" ) for all unit doors , with the understanding that the units be owner occupied only. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Apartment Ownership No. 2 The Malloy Apartments Unit No. 1-An --------------------=------------------ and, be it, FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage of this resolution the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this resolution for recording to the Ramsey County office of Register of Deeds . 2. � Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of: osw�i ��— . . on �- acca ee T— e tmatl T— WiZson —�- By: O Adopted by Council: Date JU N i 2 1990 Form Ap roved by City Attorney Adoption ertified by Council Secretary By: � ��; � � • By' Approved by Mayor for Sub ission to Approved by Mayor: Date G,�a,��D ,UN � 2 ��ncil By: ��[.7��c"// � By: pllBUSNED i � • � ��e-y�� °�ommuni�y�ervices � °A�'"m"�D GREEN SHEET No. 84�� 1 DATE INITIAUDATE CONTACT PER80N 8 PFIONE 2 9 2—,�,�,�5 �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR '�� CITY COUNCIL ' �� CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLEAK MUST 8E ON C�INCIL AQENDA BY(DATE� ROUTMIp BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.�MGT.SERVICEB DiR. ASAP m�u►vop coR nssisT,�n ❑ TOTAL N OF SKiNATUF�PAGES � (q.IP ALL LOCATIONS FOR 8KiNATUI� • ACTION REOUE8TED: Approving the action of the Property Code Enforcement Board REC�IVED (Saint Paul Board of Appeals & Review) 51990 RE MENDATION8:ADP��+lN a�(AI COIINqI.COMMIITEEIRE�EARCH REPORT GPTIONAL. _PLANNINO OOMMISSpN _pVIL SERVICE COMM18810N """"'� RECEtVEF�'�"E N0. �mmu�lry� _CIB COMMITfEE _ -�� - �""""�8: �1AY 2 91990 _DI8TRICT COURT _ su�o�s w�,oouNa��EC„vea MAY'OR'S OFFDC� INITIATINCi PROBLEM.18SUE,OPPORTUNITY(VYho.Wh�t,Whsn�Whwe.Wh�: Ap�roving the action of the Property Code Enforcement Board for the meeting of April 10, 1990. � 3 - �ariances ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Varianc�s granted to the property owner by the Board wi11 b,e ratified. ' as�wv�wr�es��r+anovEO: None DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The action taken by the Board will be returned to the Board by the City Council for further review. RECEryED .,�. � .� . . _..,.�� . J�Q1I'�O MAY 31 i99q CITY ClERK TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRAI�ACTION = n/a COBT/AEYENI�WDAETED(GlICLE.ONE) YE8 NO X FUNDIN�#SOURCE n/a ACTIVITY NUMBER 3 3 2 6 3 FlNANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� ` � . ; ., ' NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE(iREEN SHEET IN8TRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASINi'a OFFICE(PHONL NO.298-4225). ROUTINt3 ORDER: Bebw are proM►red routinga for the five most frequent types of documeMs: CONTRACTS (assum�authorized COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amsnd,Bdgts./ buc�gst sxists) A►c�pt.aranta) t. outaid�A�ency t. Depertment Director 2. InitiaNny DepertmeM 2. Budget Director 3. City Attomey 3. City Attorney 4. Maycx 4. MayoNAe�ataM S. Finar�ce 8 M�mt 3vca. Director 5. Gty CouncN 8. Flnancs Accour�tiny • 6. Chief Acca�r�tarn, Fin�Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUN(�L RESOLUTION (all othsrs) Flevision) end ORDIWWCE 1. Activity Mans� 1• IniUedng Department Director � Depeutment AocouMant 3. DspartmsM Dfrector 3. MayoN�t 4. Budpet Directa 4. City Couhcil 5. City Clerk 8. Chief AccourKant� Fln d�Mymt Svca. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) , 1. Initiating Depertrt�nt 2. City Attomey 3. MayoNAseistant 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAC3ES Indicate ths A�of pepes a�which signatures aro rocp�ind and srd se�ctt of theee� ACTION RE�UE3TED Describs vrhat the project/request seska to sccanp�sh in either chronologi- cel oMsr or order of importance.whicF�s�rer Is mo�t appropriate 1or the issus. Do not write compiste ssnterw,ba. Begin each Rem In your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complets ff the isaue in questfon hes besn preseM�d be�ore any body,Public a private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNdL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Caxx�l objectiw(s)Y�+�P��«i��bY Nstinp the keY word(s)(HOUSIN(i. RECREATION�NEIOHBORHOOD3� ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDCiET, SEWER SEPARATION).(SEE OOMPLE7'E LI8T IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.), COUNGL OOMMITTEE/RE3EARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL A3 REAUESTED BY COUNCIL INITIATINti PROBLEM,IS3UE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or c�nditions tF�et cre�ted a need tor your project or requsst. ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED Indicate whethsr thfs is simply an annuel budpet procedure roquired by law/ charter or whsther ths►e are speciflc wa in which the Gy of 8eunt Paul and its ckizens wfll bsneHt fran this pro�t/actbn. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED What nsqathre Nf�cts or major chanyes to existing oc pe�proc�sas might this pro)sctlroqusst produoe ff it ia pasebd(s.g.,traffic�dslays, noise, tax increases or asswsments)?To Whom?VYhen?For how bng? DI3ADVANTAdES IF NOT APPROVED What will bs ths negative conssquer�ces if the promised action ia not approved? Inabllfty to deliver s�vfce?Continued high traffic, noise, accidsnt rate?I.oes of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT . Althou�h ycw must teilor the information you provide here to the issue you aro addresein�,fn�snsral you must answsr two queations: How much is it going to cost?VVho is going to pay? . _ �'�o-��,� ��i��r �' PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD (SAINT PAUL BOARD OF APPEALS AND REVIEW) 555 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 MINUTES, MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1990 MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Glassman, Chairman Ronald Ankeny James Laughlin Robert Viering Donald Weida MEMBERS PRESENT: William L. Tilton OTHERS PRESENT: Pat Fish, Departrnent of Fire & Safety Hope Abrams, Department of Fire 8 Safety Steve Herbert, Rainleader Division Carrolyn Shepherd, Division of Public Heaith Dennis Olson Michael Marinovich Diane J. Prichard Manley Madson, Jr. Harlan Heichel Raymond Heichel Rollie Blakely Douglas King Ed Krai 1 . Approval of the minutes of the March 13, 1990 meeting as submitted in writing. Corrections to the minutes as follows: Page 4, under PROCEEDINGS. Line 7, after the word "KITCHEN" delete the word "FROM" and insert the word "FOR" , on the same line after the word "THIRDff insert the word "FLOOR" and change the word "EXIT" to "EXITING" . On line 8. after the word "OUTSIDE" delete the word "AROUND" and insert the word "AT". On page 5 under BOARD ACTION after the word "VARIANCE" insert '•ON INSTALLING A SECOND EXIT FROM THE THIRD F�OOR". 1 Douglas King - Mr. King requested to address �he Board about 750 Blair Avenue who was the Appellant last month. "Mr. King stated that the wording under PROCEEDINGS that you just went over, I talked with her a couple of times about that. You know if you look down to the end of the paragraph, the last sentences, on page 4 middle of the paragraph, change that whole sentence. If you look at the last sentence in that paragraph it said much ctearer the same thing, the same exit, it just, I don't know maybe you could use just that same sentence, the wording in the middle of the paragraph, gets a little wordy there, and it's said much clearer there at the end of the paragraph, and if you just insert after the word third floor, the sentence would read "The interior stairs goes from the third floor in kitchen to ground level without qoing thru another apartment. " is very simply said right there. Ron Glassman - Did you take this off of the transcript? Dou4las Kina - She was trying to take the first corrected sentence from the transcript, and my wording just wasn't very concise at that point, but down at the bottom that is the exit we are talking about. Ron Glassman - Did in fact, the City go back out and reinspect this? Qoualas Kinq - Sue did not come out, somebody else came. Ron Glassman - You are coming back next month on that? Douqlas King - I am. Ron Glassman - What is the difference, what the semantics say here? As long as the meaning is here. I think we ali understand what the meaning is. Douglas King - I think ah, Ron Glassman - Am I correct, we know what the meaning is here, we know what we are trying to do, as far as semantics, I don't think that's too important. 2 � � ��-�� Douglas Kinq - I think it has to be cleared. in case this goes to some other arena. Also, the general sense, I think, of the whole reading of this matter would be cieared up or made clearer if another paragraph were inserted. (At this point Mr. King passed out a copy of what he thought should be inserted. ) Which said - "After Mr. King stated that both stair exits (the interior stair well and the new exterior deck and stairs) from the third floor are from the kitchen, Sue Toskey did not make an issue of the remoteness of the exits. She said " I had no idea you were going to say you had two exits, because if you had two exits, 1 don't know what you're even doing here" Ron Glassman - It's because of this that she is going out to see it again, so this is ridiculous. Douglas King - Sir, this it's like you saying to somebody, who just sold you a pair of shoes, Well Sir, you sold me one pair of shoes, one shoe, when the fact is, I was honest, I told everything, I sold you both pair of shoes and I think it would just make the whole scenario much clearer. Ron Glassman - I have no idea, I can't remember what I did yesterday, let alone what some one said verbatim a month ago, so I don't know of, in fact, she said this or not. I can't say, I want this added to the minutes on my behalf, because I don't know if she said it. Dou4las Kinca - my issue, then wouid be the summary, as it is written, is not inciusive of some other important items. Ron Glassman - I don't know, the Fire Department cited it. You are going to be back here next month. what's the difference? I also think we are wasting all this time here. You're coming back here next month. The basis minutes say what we wanted em to say. Anyone here have any objections, what the minutes say, or want to make any changes? Robert Vierinca - he is coming back next month! Ron Glassman - Yes, he is coming back next month away. Anything you want c eared up, will be cleared up then. Douglas King - I would hope the Board would try to achieve as concise and accurate information in there notes as possible. I would like to make one cortxnent then, on the new addition that I haven't seen before on Page 5, BOARD ACTION by adding that "Motion made to deny the variance on instailing a second exit on the third floor, that could be construed that I can never go into be permitted to install a second exit. " 3 Ron Glassman - No, No, Dougias King - There could be a better way to word it! Ron Glassman - But, that's the way she. Come on back next month. We wiil take care of it then. This is the way his motion was stated. I assume Jo, you took that out of the tape, those words. Thats the way he stated it and thats the way it was voted on. We are talking about screwy semantics here. Lets work it out next month when you come back. James Laughlin - We denied the variance because the exit was atready there, isn't that what we thought! Ron Glassman - Well , there was some question as to whether it was in the right piace. and whether is was correct or not and that is why we said without another further fee, we said, lets deny it now, lets have the city go back out there with you, have another look at it, and give you, your chance to come back without paying another fee and that's basicatly what we did. Douglas King - You denied it, because you thought I didn't need it, and this paragraph by Sue, that I am adding, that I would suggest be added, gives the information that Sue, did not make the REMOTENE55 an issue, and led you to deny it and didn't think it important, when now in fact, comes back and says its important. Ron Glassman - Weli , she didn't know, she hasn't seen it. Bring this paragraph next month. Dougias King - I 'm done. Ron Glassman - Does anyone on this Board want to make a motion, that Mr. King's appearance last month be changed any other way? There being none. Chairman GLassman then asked if anyone on the Board would like to make a motion that the minutes with Jo's correction be approved as submitted? Motion made by Robert Viering to approve the minutes of the March 13, 1990 as submitted in writing with the corrections. Seconded by James Laughlin. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 4 . �lo+y�� heirmnn Gla�smen welcomed tr�� eppzllants encJ explained the procedures, stating the what the board does is recommends action to the City Council . He asked that the statements be brief, and that the board was there as fellow citizens to help them in a fair manner. ---------------------------------- 2. CASE HEARINGS: CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 29-90-R 1897 LaCrosse Ave Dennis G. Olson (4 units) APPEARANCE: Dennis Olson SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from the requirement of having to disconnect rainleaders, as it will cause basement flooding and would be very costly. � PROCEEDINGS: Mr. Olson stated that he was not aware that the building was not in compliance. The building was purchased in December of 1986. At that time the leader from the roof had been routed out to the lawns, I had no idea to even question anything, then last fall I got a letter from the City indictating that I was not in compliance with code on the gutters that are down at the bottom of the driveway. This area is solid concrete an area 10 ft by 100 ft. and beyond that, going to the boulevard, we have the sidewalk and the area between that is asphalt. What the City is requesting to be done is to disconnect the drains and come up with some alternative to deal with the water. At one point the suggestions was made that I could pay the annual amount for the treatment of the water. which I am willing to do. The rough quote was not in excess of probably a couple hundred dollars a year. Since then, the city denied me that and wanted me to disconnect. If I disconnect, the way the building is, obviously the basements and the garages would be completely flooded everytime there was rain. The only other option that I have, is to disconnect those and put in some sort of a sump mechanism to collect the water, which means I wouid have to tear up the ma,jority of the driveway that is there. If you observe the building it is substantially up in the air and the ground descends all the way around the building. Ron Ankeny, asked Mr. Herbert if he could come up with a suggestion for Mr. OLson. Steve Herbert, from the Rainleader Division stated that the only suggestion that he could come up with is, that the Appellant connect to the storm sewer. 5 Steve Herbert stated that the Appetlant, in all probability, would have to dig up the middle of the two driveways at the bottom, and then run a line to the two catch basins, and then run a line out to the storm sewer, or coutd run one to the catch basins if they are deep enough. . Chairman Glassman asked, What would the cost be? Steve Herbert, stated in the driveway about $90.00 a foot, for a total cost of about 6 or 7 thousand dollars. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Ankeny to grant a variance from the requirement of having to disconnecting the rainleaders. Seconded by Robert Viering. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Steve Herbert asked Mr. Ankeny if he would please state the reason that he is granting the variance. Mr. Ankeny stated that he feels it is unreasonable to expect this Appellant to pay the cost, I feel this is a real hardship. Steve Herbert informed the Board that 40% of the commercial owners within the City of St. Paul get cost, if not greater, equal to what he is being asked to pay. If this Board starts giving variances on commercial property, then we are looking for trouble. Robert Viering stated that his feeling on this is, that if the City feels that this is a potential problem, then the City should look into some alternatives to help the owners to do this. Steve Herbert, stated that there is a agency, which a owner could contact, that is PED. Robert Viering stated that he is very familiar with PED program, and that is, borrowing half the money at a good rate, the problem is borrowing the other haif at market rates. Ron Glassman stated that at the beginning of the rainleader program, persons from the Rainleader Division informed this board that they should feel free to give a variance only if it is a real hardship. ---------------------------------- 6 �/=yo-�f� �5-�1�-H lU� Cl �veland Ave. S�. Michael M�r�inavich ( 1 unit) APPEARANCE : Michael Marinovich SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from code on the following items; Items #1 - Cellar sleeping rooms have insufficient natural light, #2 - Cellar sleeping room egress window wells of insufficient size, #3 - Celiar rooms have insufficient ceiling height, #4 - Cellar livingroom has insufficient natural light and ventilation. An extension of time is requested on Items #5 - No handrail for stairway from cellar to the first floor, #8 - repair or remove dilapidated garage. Inspection letter date February 9, 1990. PROCEEDINGS: Appellant stated on Item #1 regarding insufficient ) ight, that there is 6 sq. ft. of window area. When this window was installed, appellant was informed that it was according to code. Carolyn Sheppard, from Public Health stated that the Code requires 8 sq. ft. in the cellar, minimum, otherwise 8 percent of the floor area. T'he rooms were not measured, because there was a question as to whether it was being operated as a roominghouse, because there was more than four persons unrelated living there. It is my understanding the the Appellant has an agreement with zoning, that by June 1 , 1990 the number of occupants be reduced to only four unrelated persons. Michael Marinovich, Item # 2 egrees window wells. these windows measure 2 1/2 feet out and 8 inches on either side. I believe the code is 3 feet on either side. I believe the window is very sufficient for an egress window. Carolyn Sheppard, it has been generaity accepted in the case of casement windows. Item #3 - insufficient ceiling height, the Appetlant stated he installed a drop ceiling that rest on the underside of the plumbing to provide a maximum height, which is about 6'6" to 6'9", code is 7ft. Appellant has no idea how to solve this problem. Ron Ankeny stated that maybe if the pipes were exposed, then maybe the ceiling height would be o.k. Carolyn Sheppard stated that she did not believe that the ceilings in the basement were that high. Item #4 - Cellar LR insufficient light and ventilation, the two windows in the livingroom measure 4.5 sq. ft. and they open 100%. From the ventilation standpoint the appeilant feels the light and ventilation is sufficient. 7 Caroiyn Shepard stated that it definitely does not have sufficient light and ventilation. Item #5 - handrail missing on stairway to ceilar, Appellant will do the work. he just needs more time at least 30 days. Item #8 - repair or removed dilapidated garage, Appeilant will do the work, but would like at least 150 days to do the work. Item #6 - Appellant needs clarification as to where the smoke detectors should be. There are two in the basement, two on the main floor and one upstairs. Jim Laughlin - Are they interconnected? Michael Marinovich - No, they are battery operated. The appellant stated that he will do what he has to do to make the house safe. Where does one get information as to what is code? Jim Laughlin stated that the Appellant call the Housing and Building Code Office. Ron Ankeny asked the Appellant if he had a building permit at the time he remodeled the house. Mr. Marinovich told the Board that he did not have a permit. Ron Ankeny asked if this is a two level house with a �basement, and that there will be people down in the basement. I guess the problem is, this does not meet the code, in terms of habitable space. because of the ceiling heights. Ventilation seems to be sufficient. I believe you are not to have people in the basement. Is that not correct? Ron Glassman asked Carolyn Sheppard what she thought in general about the basement? Carolyn Sheppard informed the Board that the Appeliant had done a very nice �ob remodeling, except it does not meet code. Jim Laughlin stated that the Smoke Detectors must be interconnected. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Ankeny to grant a variance on cellar sleeping room light and ventilatlon, cellar sleeping room egree window size, cellar rooms ceiling height and cellar livingroom natural light and ventilation. In addition give an extension of time for 30 days (June 1 , 1990) to install handrails on cellar stairs and 150 days (October 1 , 1990) to remove garage, with the understanding that the garage be secured so it is safe from children. Seconded by Robert Viering. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8 ��-�� Mr. Ankeny would iike it stated in the mtnutes why the variances were given, because the life saftey item pertaining to the egrees window meets code. ---------------------------------- 7-90-F 596 Portland Ave. Raymond Heichel (4 units) APPEARANCE: Harlan Heichel 8 Raymond Heichel SUBJECT: Appeilant is requesting a variance on Stove/Refrigerators in four rooms; light furniture storage on third floor and house repair materiai to be stored in basement. PROCEEDINGS: Harlan Heichel wants a variance on the sleeping rooms to be allowed to leave the stove and refrigerators in these rooms. _ Pat Fish, from Department of Fire and Safety stated that it was very difficult to clarify exactty what Mr. Heichel needs. He is before the board today, because of what he has. Presently. he has a five unit apartment building, because he has kitchens inside of the sleeping rooms, but has a shared bath. In order to make it a legal five unit buildi�g, he would h�:ve to add a bath inside each unit, then he would have to go to the Zoning Board for approval for a five unit apartment. The other way he could go (which Mr. Heichel insists he has) is four sleeping rooms and his own unit. Ms. Fish has observed five units, plus an extra unit in the attic. The four units on the second floor do share one bathroom What Mr. Heichel would like (at least thats the way he explained it to Ms. Fish) he would like a variance from the Board so as not to have to remove the kitchens out of the sleeping rooms and still remain sleeping rooms. Then Mr. Heichei would not (by law) have to have a Certificate of Occupancy and not have a license for rooming and boarding. Ms. Fish did explain to Mr. Heichel that he would have to discontinue the use of the attic. Ron Glassman, stated that the 8oard cannot grant a variance on stove and refrigerator in a sleeping room, maybe this issue should be before Zoning first. Ms. Fish stated that if the Board were to give him a variance on the stove and refrigerator then Mr. Heichel would not have to go before Zoning, because it would not be a rooming house, but a single family house. Chairman Glassman stated that if we allow stoves and refrigerators in the sleeping rooms then the Board is ,�eo,jard i z i ng the Zon i ng 1 aw. Mr. Heichel stated that the rooms were in existince before that law came into effect. 9 Chairman Glasman, informed the Appellant that most of the violations are because laws do change. Mr. Heichel stated that the house has been in the present state since 1930. Mr. Heichel purchased the building in 1964. Ms. Fish informed the Board that she is not recommending that the house remain as is, even as a single family home Ms. Fish has observed some electric, smoke detectors not working and some border line unsanitary conditions that constitute a hazard in there proximity to the stoves. Ms. Fish is very concerned about the safety to the occupants. Ms. Fish has discouraged Mr. Heichel from renting out the units. and tried to convince him that this was not a good situation. There is furniture on the third floor, but the day that Ms. Fish was there for the inspection, she observed no one in the third floor unit. Ed Kral , one of the occupants would like to have the variance granted because he wants to remain living there. Ron Glassman stated that the Appellant should go to Zoning for clarification, then if need be the Appetlant could come back to the Appeals Board for a variance on a share bath situation, if need be. Am I correct in what I 'm assuming? Ron Glassman stated that if the board were to grant a variance on allowing the stove and refrigerator to remain in the sleeping rooms this would be a single family house with the right to rent rooms, therefore, no future inspections. Ron Ankeny, stated that this does not meet the requirement of a single family home, not with the five kitchens, I believe this case should be sent to the Board of Zoning. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Glassman to deny the request for a variance to allow a stove and refrigerator in the sleeping room, with the condition that the Appellant go before the Board of Zoning to allow 5 apartment units, then Appellant be allowed to return to this Board for further review to request a variance on shared baths, if necessary. ---------------------------------- 24-90-F 732 Holiy Ave. Unity Church of St. Paul Jane L. Hilliard SUBJECT: Appetlant is requesting a variance from having to install panic hardware for 12 doors and 3 door closures, this would create a financial burden. Case resolved - Withdrawn. ------------------------------ 10 ��-�� 26-90-F 480 St. Peter St. Juvenile Detention Ctr. Diane J. Prichard SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from the requirement of having to "Remove keyed locking device from rear gym door. " Letter dated February 16, 1990. . Case resolved - Withdrawn. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Glassman to refund the filing fee of $10. 00. Seconded by Robert Viering. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ------------------------------ 27-90-F 62 Dale St. So. Manley Madson, Jr. (6 units) APPEARANCE: Manley Madson . SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from the requirement of having to "Provide dead bolt locks for ai ) apartment doors. " Letter dated February 13, 1990. PROCEEDINGS: The building is a security buildfing and is owner occupied, therefore, a variance is requested. Pat Fish, from the Departrnent of Fire 8 Safety stated that most of the units have deadbolt locks and the building is a security building and owner occupied. Ms. Fish would like to make a condition that the units not be allowed to be rented. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Glassman to grant the variance from the requirement of having to provide deadbolt locks ( 1") for ali unit doors, with the understanding the units be owner occupied only. Seconded by Robert Viering. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOULSY ------------------------------ 28-90-F 806 Earl St. Bart Montanari (4 units) SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from the requirement of having to "Provide one hour fire separation at ceiling in furnace room. " Letter dated January 26, 1990. Case postponed to the May meeting. ---------------------------------- There being no further business meeting ad3ourns at 3:30 p.m. 11 :o � �° . � ; N • � • � rl �--� . ' O1 ' � � � � . � ' � .� w . . � O fY. � O � U �� W � • � � ' � . N '""� � ?- b � ., �'' a �� Z � ,� o � U W � W � � w �y N O `1 � � �m OU � � . O � . � � � . •r O • U � N O . � � � � ' U • � j � � C • . � � E � . • • � � � . � � � � ►--� � N . p � E� d' � ,� � a ,� a J i N � ¢ i � � �C N S-- � . � " +.� ,� Z U O � � � � � >- >- Z +� C � � O f~-a � QO ' O � U U M �"'� �` . � 9� �� . . ��cu�Et�� Mo. , �FftCE CU. RECOR �� .� RAMSEY G4tlt�TY NN � CERT. RECOR�ED OIV . '� Il 9 3� A!� '�f _.,,-�... �cD � LOtI Mck�NNA ;�s_,.�� t;� ;; Y R CORDER 1991 . . MAR� 2 .. �.__ , __._. ��utY o �� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) ss. CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) I� . , . . . Albert B: O1son . . . � . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .City C1erk of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have 90-986 compared the attached copy of Council Eile No.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 12, as adopted by the City Council. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .19. . .. . . June 12, and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 19. .�. . . with the original thereof on file in my office. I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy . of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul,. Minnesota this . . . . . 28th . . . . day of , , , February. . . . . ,A.D. 19.91 . . .ry � i. . . . . . . . . .. .• .. . .• . . . • • • . .. . . . . • . . . . . ��L , ,:� City Clerk. i� .- Y .Er-� �, �' � � � .�, .� ' ' � � . � � ,.� �y ; �,�� . y ..M � •" `f2 '"f `�p�;� - , " !.'r�, °�" �� %' a s �, iS � � eE /;G 1 �.x y. , .. J I�F'� � . �H, �"„ ' ti�� I' �'�� ' . . . ,�� ,r, �`,;�-� ;'/° ` � rr��_? �' �7t� .�'T ��^ ;,A � ii1J' 7 1�?9, i' '°e '� . _ a n �� O F,. , � .. .. .. � �}.;�.J ° aY� � �!r��t�r� r91 `� y „ �. ° � . � � J .r . . �� . � ,fy o i - t.. r .�,�Y,.- . � . 1 7 ,� � � C �� .�°� � � , �� . ,�� _ . , _ � : . : � � .: -. :�-�