Loading...
90-731 I � \ � /I ��������%���Y��t�� _ �\� City of St.Paul COUNGIL FILE NO._,�� 7�� � , r� RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By � � �.�--�, .� -r F' No. �"�E�-71 Voting Assessment No: ���� Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for Sidewalk Recoaatrnctton �st the falloving �OCAt10A2 1 5-88-71 5aath side of W, �iin�ehsha Avesue fron� �ent Strtet to Macknbi� 8treet. Preliminary Order A!t—lAt}8 approve�' �Teve�6er I5, 19$8 FinalOrder ���22 approve� �'�csa�ber 2t�, I98$ a A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratitied. RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in �n h , w n y equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code. COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date � � � YeasD�,�p� Nays ��t$ �-. Certifie ss by Coun ' ecre ry Lon�r `J �ce�bee In Favor By � Tharta_ � Against �O/ �,� M� 2 �99� Mayor �.ISHEO M�AY 1 '? 1994. ,. -° � yr° f,.....---' . •__-...�-'��t J�:7`%'�.'""s.rr��, / City of St.Paul COUNCIL`FIL N0. �� ��� Office of The Director of Finance - By REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT �-- File Na ���"'�� Voting Assessment No. ��'�� _ Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for �ief:vsl�C i�fcoast��etia� �t t3a• tc�Il��rfa� l�e�tias�t 1 �—g�-7I �S�►�t�+ sfda of C�. �ti��ee�at+a A�r�+���r f r�� l�en� Stre��C to ##a�kr��i� :�tra�t. Preliminary Order ��^-Z��S approvecL ��e��' 1�- 1�'�� Final Order ���`��� approve�l ����� ��' t��� To the Council of the City of St. Paul: The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,486.36 En 'neerin and Ins ection $ 1,345.91 P� B p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation and Assessment Services $ 134.59 ProcessSetving Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5�966.86 Charge To. . 19$8 .Public.Imgrovem�nt.A�.d . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 00.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,966.86 Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve- ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. Dated Director of Finance . , . ., . . RE 3/7/90 � q� "7.3��o✓- � o� DEPARTMENT/OFFlCEICOUNqI r DATE INITIATED Q7 Finance/Real Estate Division S/12/89 GREEN SHEET NO. 3 5 v J CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE INITUIU OATE INITIAUDATE /�,,� �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Peter White� "298-5317 �M�� �c�v nrroRN�r �crrr cx�K MUBT BE ON COUNqL AOENDA BY(DAT� ROU7ING �BUDf�ET DIRECTOR �FIN.Q MOT.BERVICES DIR. Must be in City Clerk's Office no �Mn,voR�oR,�ssisr�rm Q ('.�tmril TOTAL N OF SIGNATURE PAOES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR 8KiNATUR� ACiION REQUESTED: 1. Setting hearing date for ratification of assessments. 2. Ratify assessm�ents for sidewalk reconstruction on South Side West Minnehaha Avenue - Kent File No. S-88-71 Assessment No. 3571 (to Mackubin) RECOMMENDATION8:Approw(l y a Rys�t(i� COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT OPTIONAL _PLANNIN(i COMMIBSION _qVIL 8ERVICE OOMMI8SION ��'Y8T PHONE N0. _q8 COMMITrEE _ COMMENTS: _STAFF _ _DI8TRICT OOURT _ 8UPPORTS WHlpi OOUNqI OBJECIIVE? INITIATINCi PROBLEM.188UE�OPPORTUNITY(Who�Wh�t�Whsn.Whsre,Why): Project is complete. Ratification is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help pay for the project. ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Same as ab�ve. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes. RECE�vF� �O���J� ��ri' C�.��t1� DIBADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy. I�UUi}��t �:<.�"��::���Tl l.i�li��r MAR 0 7199� TOTAL AMOUNT QF TRANSACTION a WST/REVENUE BUDOETED(CIRCI.E ON� YES NO FUNDING 80URCE PIR ACTIVITI/NUMOER 802-60002-6001-60002 FlNANqAL INFORMATION:(EXPWN) Total Proj ect Costs - $5,966.86 Funded by: Assessments - $5,966.86 dw .. - . . 1 , NOTE: COMPLETE DIREC'fIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET FNSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAIIABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Bebw are preferred routings for the five most frequent types of dxumentsc OONTRACTS (assumea authorized COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend, BdgtsJ budget exists) Accept. (3rants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Initieting Department 2. Budget Director 3. Ciry Attomey 3. City Attomey 4. Mayor 4. Maycx/AssistaM 5. Finance&Mgmt Svcs. Director 5. City Council 6. Flnance�unting 6. Chief AccouMant, Fin&Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (Budget COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all othe►s) Revision) and ORDINANCE 1. Activiry Manager 1. Initiating Department Director 2. DepartmeM AccouMant 2. City Attomey 3. DepartmeM Director 3. Mayor/Asafstant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chlef Accountant, Fin 8�Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) 1. Initiating Departmerit 2. C1ry Attorney 3. MayoNAssistant 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip each of theae pages. ACTION REQUESTED Deacribe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the ' issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been preseMed before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH CAUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your proJecUrequest supports by Iisting the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUD(33ET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNCIL COMMITTEE/RESEARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL INITIATINO PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED .Indicate whether this is aimply an annual budget prxedure required by Iaw/ charter or whether there are speciflc ways in which the City of SaUt Paul and its citizens will beneflt from this project/action. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Whet negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traiflc delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom�When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? InabilNy to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenueT FINANGAL IMPACT Afthough you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? .. � . �-. � r.. . � �. /� .f'�.. � � . . . . . . . . , . . ."� --� .-• �rv�v m�o r m m o-.-n a_ _� .. o�n��f N n�w - - ,,.. � c,�a n v m m � � o-�� . .�.. u,n , � ..�� u� .- �-��a �a o-� � v� � rvnrvc, rvrvn nc+n nM n n�n nnn a v a v a a a a s - u+�,..'. s .�ciou �c um h " ' __ .' _.'_— "'_. _ ^ _-. ' �___ 1 'i '. _._ _._ ._I_. _.. . i ' ~ I �j 1 O 1 '� � � W � � [Y i � � I 1 � F- 1 i I N 1 I I i 1 W I ' If�Y 1 I i � � � I � i � I D� I P 1 I , �y I I � 1 �t 1 �I � i � I 1 l7 I ! I 1 1 1 � ' � 1 � I9 1 Y�f �M h i � � ' � � � � � I M � � � 1 Yf �N r1 I � ' ' �. � � �, i � E 1 � � I m p � 1 I j i � a � ' � n � x � M � � � � � O 1 M M I A 1 � i F- 1 r � I M � 1 � � � � i . � j V 1 N 1 1 ` 4, j � j I . .. i i . I I � i � i ; � ; i ! � ' � ' ( ( .. z i � � o i � � _ � s � � i � i m o � � � � ' � � ' i i ' I � � � s s � ; � I � , � , , � � � � � i I � j i � � o a i INn i n i � � i d F � � � a i � I i I � ., � � I . I I O 1 N t , I i � . N i j j � � � 1 t 1 ! J � � � , � ; � 1 � I i � I I I � I I I � � , , � �.. � � s � � � a z { i a = t ; , � � � � � i � i � � j , ( < � i ..� , I i � � ; s � ; ; I � ; ; ; , , , M I V �. ' I C7 � .. I � J 1 W 1 4. W I ' � � � �� .�" I ° �� I ; a � i av �i� i �2va i i ° i u°�� ►-00 i � .�.� i i , ui � °�i i > a c� i - � i � 1 N� ��1= 1 O �� J 1 � � ' � 1 0� .�° � � �N�� ' � � '° � � I W i �O .Yf� I N �+ . H i n � . I i I $ � cYi� tA: i � ;;~ o � w � ; i � I O�qq '�3 I N qf�7 � 1 � i 1 I I I � i ' � a� i n i � ' ' � i i i•+ i � � i i W I I I oW i O 1 Z F p a I 1 = �� tU � � . I i I 0� � 1 Z�¢ .+ 1 Z N�+�N•+ I N � t I I W 1 � Q W �+�Q 1 Z �+ I / .� ' . h } 1 R OS .. 1 ►+ 1-O I � ro a i' $ .. � i' E�w..�ii 1 � � ' o ¢ i 84�. 11�� i Oh�-+W��fq I 31 ! I ~ t LZ L a I N�OJ1S�a I Q 1 I i 0�i p� ! y�►�1- E(g 1 W •r �(g 1 ►+ r . � ',. , �' � � M1� O 1 L J N J Z I L fA J I Z � W r �. � o! rci ��� �a�ai ��na�a { � � �'i I , i I w i �z anz t oanz i I I ~I Z I 3�0; O I 3 � pW 1 I- � � ' ' I O 3 1 O � i-p�4. 1 O O F-Op. I O � � � �+� O � —t�C) fd # * 1 F O N'�K # 1 f- � �_ _ - __ _� — : � , � � o rI ".�_ m � m m o . � -�, m � u; m o ��� ro� I ' . � �? ?� .Y �v ui �r v •' � � � .. . .- .- � _ n « .� :, rv cv rv n n� ri n � �-, :�, r� � . . :, u� � r� ,�. ._. ..� . _ �,._ . _. _ _ � �^ � � _�+. r� �r ... u� �� '.-. ., a m �. m �� _� . .�.-.._.. �., . ^. ^ '. . , _ ' _ ' -_...,' _�, "�. - - �90- �-� � � _��. � ,; �. �y�, � '� �'7 i �..� �r'--' ' .c..: �..:ii w^�.C�`�r'�.�:�� ...-� �1�.��.? �'o;�a',�'.a...-'�,�,:`-}}?� -.: f ; � RESOLUITON APPROVII�TG AS8ESSMENT.AND;;��'x'� Y�,� f r ; `` f � 1 x x:-'A �1��i+�x."t'�4,. A:. ��Oir���#. ;ti r.. ;.a, '�xrL. � s � '�n'�^.. `'�'�.a:i4��5;�sst , � � +�FIXING TIME OF HEARINf�THEREON � �� • � �' i�+�,� � = x� b4�� �4�� "y.r �cn' �,�� ��;y ���.' '�Qt �:"�.,�� .-r ',n �—"`�.-�� y a ��:.�-�:..� � yd- �,, g-�. . �t „ _:?,i .�Y"kj 't �N?f � �� ^+.1.!`^.� �' m . ; Co�r�cil FIIe No 90 4U6 By.Janice Re�Eman-.,- . ',, ...��"���,*�,�,�_ ��, >: �� , ,. xu���', � -�i`t�. ? . ,�,�Ir� the matter.of the•:assessiiient of.benef�ts, cast.and expense�for,sidewaik i reconstructton at thc followtng�ocatiorr " ' $� '�LL ',��' � � ;� � :. �'�Voting Wasd a��at"� �#=��s ' ,. t. . : > _ � ��, ,. ` � � s,i �„i�r Y '�� � 2��$88 I South side'of W�1!�in e aha ve lrom° en St-�tq�Nla�cli b'ln St��� . °= �``•�4 z".: �`#.'i�s"7�'�tA "� 5.+^:t�ea'i�'si��� ��bt' �`i� � +.��" . ' Under Pre'�'�minary Order 88=1808 approyed Novembe'�5,-.�1 88,�Flnai]C�ider88 2012 � - appr,oved December ZO 1988 � `'�""' �y �' �°" � �'�= ; y �'t'-Kt*"�sr 3�F x:,r ., nr r,.�� .",�-t�tt��.�'w�'4`X..�- � �� �' : ...�R„, •A.��,�. � 3���. � .� a,,The assessment of bencfits„�ost and expen"s�es,f.or 8nd ln connc cUon�wlthithe above � � improvement�h�vingbeen submitted to the Gouncl�,aiid�lie Council liaving eonsidered ' s .--:s -+ n �s�; ^. . .a+�e�Vds �.� �. t a- 4z ta�r x 2, same and found the said assessmenf satisfac'fory.,ttier�fbre,be ft����t$� ;� s � ix � ,1 , ,. �t r�r�*�r xc��r � x��'�,�� e���"'�?��t3�•�`Y RESOLVED That the said assessmentbe anc�t��azne is herelSy in�all res�ecis approved � �z .y' �' �n }o'v .tjt'F�..�'� x .,.,� �S"� 1 a�bx�.�' � +�`dF�,t?r�'s' -s' n4�,�a��+k��,it`.a�"�aC�1' �"i'rY" Ff' rf'x .- �,12ESOLVEDFURTHER4Thatapubli�hear#ngbeTiadonsa}dassessment�inthe�,sti� ' y'�day of May,.l�90 af the l�our of 9:00"o"clock"A'M,in�he Couricil Gha"mber oTthe Court�� o uflding in ttie"City of Sf PauT;'�ha�'tYie Direcfor of Finance� ive � notice of said'meeting as requlred bv the Chaif�r�"sta�in'g�n said notice`the-,time and'�p ;. p �s,t e t�-g�r , �f � r e a<-•r'+'t�r.t�w.' y ..�=r •tzc o�-t � g aix`�'_:� lace of hcazin the°naturc�of the im rovement and�he ambunt assessed a a�n`sf the ` iot or lots of the particular owner Lo whom"the�io�ice is directe�:�'��; � �?;"'+=� �:� File No S88 71 Assessment No 3571 "% a "�' � �,�, ; ������?. Adopted by�Council March 15:1990 �" � ;M ,�, �� � :.'�� . ,�,� . r .,`k `� .. . �.-- 6 a;C'c 4��'.� Y � � 4.�i1" � ;v���� �Apprrned bv Mavor March 16 1990 ,a� � ;,.. � .,��' �` �`'tt���"+�a'f����h�` "'" �{ ,� �M'dT�4. 99.��.- � •:r� �''"3f�`�t t:� x 23�,v`t',,ar'K < , r,• �a' � r�; r _�,;.:; � ���'� �� � � ' , .:>Y.ei�±:.,�_+"° ....,fs� •: �. ` �� tr .. .°'��. s''..4.a,....r. .. _...._�...' .. „. . , . _ , . r`i�� - .