The URL can be used to link to this page

90-45 WMITE - CITV CLERK PINK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAITL Council /� CANARV - DEPAR�MENT (%� BLUE - MAVOR � �• File NO• L O � Cty Att/PMcC Council Resolution Presented By Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date DATE OF BOARD MIIVUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 11/14/89 118-89-F 601 Rice Street Howard S . Bolitho BOARD RCTION: Granted a variance for painting of engines , bumpers and wheels only, until such time that the Fire Marshall has ruled on the safety of painting of bumpers and wheels , if the Fire Mar.shall objects , then the Appellant be allowed to return to Board. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Section 36 Town 29 Range 23 Subj to Th 49/Beg at Intersection of W L of Rice St and S L of N '-z of NE 4 Sec 36 Th N on Sd St 56 Ft Th W 76 Ft Th S 56 Ft to Sd S L of N2 of NE 4 Th E 76 Ft to Beg in Sec 36 Tn 29 Rn 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon passage of this resolution the City Clerk, is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this resolution for recording to the Ramsey County Office of Register of Deeds . COUNCILMEN Yeas Dl;►�pt'la Nays Requested by Department oE: C�Swlt� _�_ [n Favor �Lon9 �2��'�G Maceai�ee 0 __ Against BY `Re��nar�'- - °��ne'�. '��1�' JAN 9 1990 Form by �t o�n Adopted by Council: Date — � `Z—/� �� Certified P• • by Coun � Secreta BY Bl' y1 Approved by � avor. D e ��iv � o �� Approv Mayor for Sub ' sio to�ouncil By, �!��,/ B pU�1.ISHED J�N 2 0199� CITV CLERK - FINANCE GITY OF SAINT PAITL Council ///� CANARV - DE`PARiMENT File NO. /� � BLUE - MAVOR � � Cty. At�y/PMcC • • - � �' uncil Resolution ( ��,1 Presented By �.� .___-. Referred To Committee: Date Out of Committee By Date BE IT RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the action of the City of Saint Paul Board of Appeals and Review pertaining to the following listed property and as shown by the Excerpted Minutes of said Board of Appeals & Review dated November 14, 1989 and marked EXHIBIT A, and attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference : DATE OF BOARD MINUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 11/14/89 86-89-F 771 W. 7thSt. James Pierce BOARD ACTION: Granted a variance on the present booth in the building to be allowed to be used as a limited spray area, as is , even though it was built without permit. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: A. Vance Brown' s Sub. of Blk 4 and East half of Blk 13 inBrown, Stinson & Ramseys Addition to St. Paul Subj to Hwy Lots 9 10, 11 & Lot 12 Blk 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNCILMEN Requested by Department of: Yeas Di. OXld Nays G s itz In Favor Lo Re tman _ __ Against BY `- Sc, eibel SCi nen Wi 1'son Form Ap d by City rne Adopted by Council: Date _ Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� C �'�< �� gy, Approved by ;Vlayor: Date _ Approve Mayor for Subm' ion t Council By� - - — 1 . . � ��o-�s ��'V i e on�iNm�reo GREEN SHEET No. �6 8 7 — — INI7IAU DAIE OONTACT PER80N d 2 9 2—•�•�•�5 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR qTY COUNpL � CITY ATTORNEY .,� C�TY CLERK NUIMEII FOR MUBT BE COUNGL AQENDA BY(D ROUTINO BUDQET DIRECTOR FIN.8 MOT.BERVICEB DIR. P 0 M,nvoa�oR nssisra�m _ � ❑ TOTAL M OF SIONATURE PA 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� ACTION REWES'fED: Resolutior� approving the action of the Board of Appeals & Review REOOMMENDATIONS:MW�e(�)o► (R) R� COUNCIL RCFI REPORT OPTIONAI _PLANNINO COMMISSION _�GVIL SERVICE COAAMISSIOON g�� PHONE NO. _GB COMMIITEE _� _BTAFF OOMMENT8: _D18TRICf OOURT —��[�y�� CjE . BUPPORT8 WHICN OOUNqL OBJECiIyE? '•"" — �� C� INITIA71N0 PROBLEM,IS3UE,O NITY(Who,Whet,When.Whero.Why): Approving th� action of the Board of Appeals & Review for the meeting of November 1�4, 1989 (attached are two pages of the December 12, 1989 meeting show��ng corrections to the November ll�, 1989 minutes . 3 - variances I ADVANTIU�EB IF APPROVED: Variances gr �nted to the property owner by the Board will be ratified. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: RECEIU�� None ' ' DEC291�9 CITY CLERK DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPROVED: The action t�ken by the Board will ue returned to the Board by the City Council �for further action. t�ouncii I�esea�ch Cente�i � U t� 2 81989 � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACT'ON a n/a C08T/REVENUE BUDOETED(CIRCLE OI�1� YES NO X FuNa�a sounc� � n/a �c�nvmr NuMeER 3 3 2 6 3 FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(IXPLAII� �'V i � : . . �c-�D-� DATE OF BOARD MINUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 11/14/89 105-89-F 1977 Marshall Ave. Daniel L. Oren BOARD ACTION: Granted a variance on second exit from third floor to be used as a second exit , as long as the rise & rung are modified to meet code. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Merriam' s Rearrangement of Blocks 24, 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 & 29 Merriam park W. 10 Ft of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7 Blk 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2- ` ��a.-��; Cjyy�g iT A �A1N1 PAUL BOARD UF APPEAL� � REVItt� 555 Cedar- 5t.ree-t. 5airit Naui , MinnesoT.a `�510i NI i nutes , Meei�. i r» ofi Nnvernr��r 1 �a , i 9t3u MtMBFR:� PR�SEN��f: i=�on �;1 assman , CP-�a i rrnan William L . 1�ilton Robert Vierinc� MEMBERS ABS�NT : Ror-�a I d Arikenv OTHEkS PkE�ENi: Pat. Fish, Fire Prevent. ion Hape At�rams . F� ire Prevention Mike Ricketson . Fire PrevEnt. iori Sher�i-v Webb, F i re Prevent. i on Maynarc� Vin�e. Public Healzh C;arolyn Shepparc. Public Nealtl�i StevP Herbert, Re � nleat�er- Division PI-iil Ethier , Sewer Uiv. , P.W. Joe Ehri icn , l�. � . C1 .D. Jamr�s P i erce l"h�ma5 Sauro E . J. Ganyaw hiax, t3 i x Daniei L . Oren James Ray Steve Kaplan Howard S . Boliti�io Jane Gmur John F e 1 dbr�uegge Thomas Lieberrnan Th�mas BeII Ron Neujahr Tt��e fa I 1 aw i r�g t.wa cas�s were heard at trie meet i ng of c�ctober 1 U , 1989 mee�t i nu. After� much d i scuss i on d vo�l;e was taken and i t en�i�d u�� t.o be a t i e vote. Cha i r-man G 1 assman stated that Mr . -filton who was n�t at thP meeting of Uctober lU , 1989 , shouid hear the cases , �then his vote would break t.he tie; 1U6-89-F �788 Curfew 5t. James M. Ray APPEARAyCE : James M. Ray 5UBJECT: Appellant is requestinq a varianc� on havina to provide an escape wir�dow in 2nd filoor sieepina room. Letter Uated Augus�t 11 , 1989. PROCEEUING5: Mr . Rav stated that. wnen the hause was remodeled 1 5 _years aao the w i r�dow ttiat was i nsta 1 1 ed i n zhe the second floor bedroom was inter�ded to be unoaenabie. Mr . Rav installed a ventilation syst.em that is a sealed atmosphere. Mr . Ray i nformeci Mr . -r i ! ton of a i etter f rorn Mr. Arnev, where i n. i t. states " I was the Building Inspector �or 788 Curfew at the t.irne the unopenable windows wer-e install �d. The Uivisions director at th�.�t t i me rnade an except i on , i n th i s case, ancl d i rected me to appT-ove the work on the graunds of tne mect��an i ca 1 vent i I a�:i on svstem and ti-�e convenience o� thF si�dirwav to the bedroom door dnd the fact. t.hat. ii. ieads directiv to the outside. " (he letter was dated C)ctobPr 6, 1989 and signed by Richard L . Amey, Su�ervis�r� ofi Inspectors . i ; � 90 _�� Mr . R i cket.son . from the DEpa��trnent of F i re and Sare�ty Presented a i efi�ter- from the F i re Marsha I 1 , whei-e i n , i t refers t.o t.he r,�ciu i rernent.s , reqard i na r.lie w i ndow, wh i ch i s �1 i rect. I v trom L i te 5afiety Code, r_ I ear and expl i c i t. Tl�e F i re Marsf-�a I 1 rev i ewec! t.he Code to see i f any reso 1 ut. i on cou 1 d t�e r�ached y pr i or- to at.tend i ng tY-�e meet. i n�a. Tt-�e c�c�de i s c 1 ear , i n that , whrn there i s a f-�ouse w i th oui ��Enav 1 e w i ndow5 , �l.f�at. poses a t.h7-ead. After ti��e Uctober rneet. i ng, wY�en Mr . R i cke tsor� was made awai�e ofi �.he 1 etter f►��om M1�. Arnev . �ir . i�i cketson r e�ur,ned �'t.o tf-�e of=f i ce to researc:ti the f i i es for a 1 eti:,er fi�am Mr� . Amey. l�l�e��e i s i-�o cor•r�sporidence i n �tne f i l es tl-�a�i:. r.e�er -L:u a vdr- i �rce. Mr . -I" ii �on . asked Mr . Ricketson ifi the window had been measured to see wha�t. the o�er�ab i e space wou 1 d be! Mr. Ricketson stat.ed, the f�ct ttiat. the windaw does nc�t oper�i , makes i �� i m��ss i b 1 e to measur�e ti-�e openab 1 e s i z�. By 1 ook i ng at. it , it cioes not. appear to be large enough. Mi�. -f i I �l.on suggested that maybe there i s a casernent wi ndow tP�at cou 1 d be i nsta I ] ed from t.t��e i ns i �-Je, so as not. to have extEns i ve re��a i rs fr-om tf�e ou�ts i de, wti i ch cou 1 d b� i nsta I i ed �o rneet code. BOARD ACTION: Motion rnade by Bill Tilton to deny the request for a variance, instead grant an extension of time fai- two years , (Uci�ober 1 , 1990) , with the understanding that a casement w i r�dvw be i nsta 1 I ed �that. w i I 1 fi i t the open i ng, wr,; cr, i s acc:eptable to i.he Fire Department. Let tl�e records show that Mr . Vie��ing and Mr. Glassman voted a!�a i nst �,tie mot i on at the OcLober 1 U , 19�9 meet i ng, but. now agree with the exl.ension of time. TP�is is an extension of the Uctober 10 , 19i�9 meetinc� fiinalizing the meetiny and this has no connec�.ion to tr�e November 1989 meeting. MOTION CARRIEU UNANIMUUSLY. ---------------------------------- 11U-89-F �U/Z8 St. Aibans St. Steve Kapian APPEARANCE : Steve Kaplan t� Jane Gmur SUBJEC-f :_ Anpellant. is requestinc� a variance on having to provide w i red g�!ass i n door�s . Letter dated Apr i 1 "Z5 , 1 9�39. PROCEE:DINGS: Appellant stat�d that tl-�e tenants �in t.he buiiding feel that the windows in th� doors are just. too beautir"ul to be covered by wir�ed glass . B i i I 1-i t tor�, suc�gested that. rnaybe a cornprom i se cou i d k�E arorked out to Yiave the appellan�t install clear tem�er�d glass over the pr-esent windows in doors. l � � �� Pat F i sr�� from Dep�r�l.mc��1=. of F i r,e & SafeLy 5tdted �t.Y�i�t. tl��er•e i 5 c i ear� i�.ernpered y 1 ass ava i 1 ab 1 e y t.ha1=. cou 1 d be approved bY ti�e f i re depdrtment . �sUARU ACv�1 U�l__ Mot i an made by F3 i ! i �I i I ton t.o denY the re�7uest. tor a var i ance ��n t.i-�e w i reci g i ass w i nd��w, i r�stEad gr,anted an Extens i on c�f t i me far 3U days t.o wor k w i tr� UeparfimPnt �f F i re & '�afety to work out a v i aL� I e so i ut. i on �.o put i n aprroveci g i ass �i n door H� i ncJows , i f not , then A��.�e 1 1 ant to r etur r� t;o t.t�e Uecemb�r 1 2 . 1 9b9 rneei��i nc.7. rr„ s U I sa i s a carry over firorr� 1=.rie Oc�or�er I U, i yt3y meet i na. `T-he act i or�� on ti�i s case w i I I a 1 so f i na 1 i�e tf�e uctob�r rneet i ng. ML�-T i UN CA�:R I ED UNAN I MOUSL Y . ---------------------------------- Cha i rrnan G 1 assrnan i ntc>rmed the Appe 1 1 ants that tt��e Boar�d 1 acks a quorurn. P�ul McCloskcy, the Boards Lec7al Advisor , advised the Board to �c:t as e Committee of tr�e Board, to ren�er advisory opinioris, letting th� appellants know tf�at dny opiriion that is expressed taday, is likelY �.o be ratified k�y tYie Board at the meeting in December . If any one is aggrieved by the c�ecision of the Bo�rd today, they would have the righ� �;o return to the next meeting and plead his/her case the second time. 1 . Apprc>va 1 of t.he mi nutes of the October, 1 U, 1989 meet i ng as submi�tted i n wr i i� i ng. Because of a iack of a quorurn, the minutes of the Uc-tober lU , i98y meeting were not. appr�oved, tl-�ey wi t i be approved at the December !2 . ly8y meet.ing. ---------------------------------- 2 . CASE HEARINGS : CASE NU: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 90-88-H 1749 W. Minnehaf-�a Ave. E . J . Ganyaw ( 1 unit) AAPPEARANCE : E . J . Ganyaw SUBJECT: Appellant i5 requesting a var- iance fir-om St. . Paul Legislative CodE 41 . a3 �eri�aining ta disconnection of the rainleaders. PROCEEDTNGS: The Appellant had been before the Board 13 months ago, at wh i ch t i me i�t was suggested tr,at. tr�� C;i ty go aut to the property and do a soil test. 7he Appellant stated that this was nzver done. The land slopes towards the house. Mr. 5teve Herbei,t, from the Rainleader Division stated that tt-�e t�i tv d�es not �yo so i 1 tests . H� a 1 sa stat�d ti-�at there w��u 1 � k�r no problEm if the r�ainleaders were disconnec:ted, then reroute the autters . 3 , �Q �� o-- Mr . Tilton su�gested that the rair� leaders could be r-�routed at 1 eas-t. 20 feet , a 1 so by dd��i ng some f i 1 1 and new sad, �:o s I ape tfie 1 and awav fir orn t.r�E house. BOAKD ACTIUN : Motion made by Biil Tilton to deny t.he r�quest. fior a vai� i ance on �:t-ie ra i n 1 eaders . Seconded by Robert V i er i ng. MO-f I��N CARR I ED L1NAN I MOU5LY . Mr. E . J . Ganyaw . because of a lack of a ctuorum, requested t.o return i�o tt�e meet i r�a i n December , 1��f9. ---------------------------------- 1 1 4-89-R 6U3 h1t . Curve B 1 v�. Uona 1 r� � . B��own ( 1 unit) SUBJEC7: Appelfant is t-equesting a variance from St. Pau ! Legislative Code 41 . U3 pertaininG t� disconnection c�fi the rainlPader-s. Postporied t.a the January �, 1990 meeting. ---------------------------------- lle-89-H 707 Preble Jose�h Haines (2 units ) APPEARANCE : None SUBJEC�C�: Appe I f ar�t i s re�uest i ng an extens i on c�f t i me t.o do the n�cessary re�airs after extensive fire damage. Letter dat.ed 5ept.emkaer 1 , 1989. Maynard Vinge, from Division of= Public Health stated tt��at he heard from tl�e tenants that the buildinc� has been so1d. Ivothing r�as been f i xed. Mr� . V i rige has the narne of tt��e new owner and an addr-ess to be able �to contact the person. The front entry does not nec•essarily need repairs immediately, .j�st very ur�slightly. The upstairs and the �irst filoor unit have other means of entering or leaving the building. BOARD AC;TIUN : Motion made by Ron Glassman to deny the request far an extension of time. Seconded bv Bill Tiltor�. MC�YION CARRIEG UNANIMUUSLY . ---------------------------------- 4 � �/ r�� i �'U-�y-H `35`� Euc i i ca 5�i.. Jof7r� P. Fe i cibrueUUe fl unit? SUBJEC�f: Appelfant is request. in�� a variance ar� t.he work arders K_�ert�a i n i n�� to appearance of t.r�e gai�age; �s thE work hds been done and needs no fiurther work. Letter� dated October 2 . 19�3y . Case r�es�l ve��. BUAkD AC-�I UN : Mot i on maGe bv B i ! �i I tor; to refund tf-,e f i I i nc� fee o� � lU . OU . 5econded k�y R�bert Vierina. MU71UN �ARRIEU �INANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- 121-89-H 16U5 5eibv Ave. 7homas Lieberrnann ( 1 unit) APPEARANCE : Tt�omas L i �k�er�rnann SUBJECT^ Appe 1 1 ant: i s appea 1 i ny the "t�lot.i c� of Canden�nat.i on" . Leti:.er- dated Oct.abei- 4 , l yt3y. PRVCEEDING5: 1"he Ap�ellant stated that the building was purcY�ased 5 years a�o on a Contract for Deed. lhe owners on bo�.h sidrs ofi t.t�e building would like to purchase the building, apparently they are harass i ng me. Befare purchss i ng tP�e bu�i 1 d i ng, I contact.e� t.he Citv, I do not rernember whorn I talked to, but they said everthing wds tine. Car-o�lyn Sheppard, from Public Heait.h stated that tnis is a �_omm e r' 1 L:d� �t U 1 � �=�1 1"1 y. (`�=�, =i f'1 C(=�►_'�fi-•t=� j =: ►"�f�1_. �=a r=�t'i %i E� I r' t':r. �a e=tT. 1 tl �C's a tl-�e building to verify that it is acceptable for residentidl us�. l-he statement th�t Ms . Sheppard made to Mr. Liebermanr� was , " If sPie was unable �.o enter the building for an inspection an the i r�ter i or� , i�hen i �L wou 1 d be i ns�ected from the exter i or. " wh i ch i s w t P�1s . �heppard d i d. "rhere i s no�t suff i c i ent 1 i aht and ven�, i 1 at i on for a res i den�.�i a 1 bu 9 1 d i ng. Mr . Liebermann stated �that he lives in the building , also uses i�t for his office. Joe Ulrich, from the Zor�ing Department, st.ated that rrom a zonina standpoint, the property is zoned B-2 business propErt:Y. Regu 1 ai, i on states , that. no rnore �than 50% of the ground f I oor ma.y be used for res i dent. i a 1 , and that i s the reason why Zari i ng r-�eeds to get i nto tr�e bu i I d i ng to ver i fy i�h i s. CYia i rrnan G 1 assman , stated that the i ssue her-•e i s , the fact ttiat. tl��e i r�spectnr s wou 1 d I i ke to get. i n �o i nspect the propert.y. Chairman Glassrnar� suggested to the Appellant that. he work w9th 1_-.he i nspectors , so as �to arrange for them to c7et. i nto the building for an insr�ection. �:, � �� 90 �� Jae Ulricl7, from Lonin�t requested that Appellant set a date to (T1GE�t w i th the A�pe I I ar�t . -fhe dat.e that was sug�ested was Monday November �U , 1989 ai; 8 : UU p.rn. BUARD ACTION : Mo� ion made by Bill -fiiton t� grant an extension of t i rne un�:i 1 Novem�er ZO, 1989, w i ti-� the understand i ng tt-�at the App�llant. meEt with the Inspectors from Loniny anc� Health Dep�i-tment. to inspect trie interior, to determine if �he building i s uf-� �to c:ode, t.o work out a v i ab l e so 1 ut i�n, i f r�o�t �the Appe i 1 dnt. cou 1 d returr� to tf-�e meet i nc� i r� Uecemt�er , i f ne�:d k�e. Secor�ded by Ron G I assrnar�. MOT I ON CARR I EtJ UNAN I MOUSLY . ---------------------------------- 124-89-H 113U Forest. St.. Stephen C. Uian/Harold Conick (2 uni-ts ) l�om UelVecchio, Atty at Law SUBJEC�(: Appellant. is appealing the condemnatian and arcler to vaca�.e prem i ses . Lett�r� dated Octor�er 17 , 1989. Case r�eso 1 ved, W i thcirawn. ---------------------------------- 86-89-F 771 W. 7th St . James Pierce (Camrnerical ) At�PEARANCE : James Pierce SUBJECT: Appellan�t is ��e��uesting a variance on the requit,ement af having to Providz Autamatic Fir-e Extinguistiin� 5ystem in Spray f3oal:h and Spray B�oth Ventilatiori 5ystem must include Make-U� Air unit. Letter dai.ed July � 1 , 1989. PROCEEUINGS: Sherr�y Webb, from Uepartment of Fire & Safet._y stated tt�at the Bu i i d i ng Department d i d tl��e i nspect i on. Tr�e Bu i 1 d i ng DPpartment. will not approve the booth because it. was �ut in without. permits . What the Fire Uepartment would like to recommend is to make the area, a limited spray area, because the Appellant s�rays very few vehicles parts a year. He has vent.i i at i ori i n the area. �fhe Board cou 1 d grant. a var i ance for� a limited spray area, even though there was no permit taken out. BOARD ACTION : Motion made by Ron Glassman to grant a variance or� the present booth in trie building to be a1lowed to be used as a lirnited spray area, as is, even though it was built. without a �er,rn i t . `�Fc��ndeci t�y B i 1 1 T i !ton. M�T 1 t�N CAF2�I ED UNAN I MuUSLY , ---------------------------------- 6 . ; � �� 88-8`_>-F 2�a 1 F i I 1 m��re Ave. E . Don� I d -i. t�r i �1-�tb i i i ( 1 unit ? SUBJECT: Appellant. is request.ing a variance or� the Pit. Ven�ilat.ion for Vap<�r remova �l . Letter dated Ju1y 1t3 , 1y8�. Case Resolved, witi��drwan. ---------------------------------- y1-89-F 42U 5. Hamiii-�e Ave. Lais B. Jacobs {3 units) SUBJEC�T : Ap��ellant. is requesting a variance pertaining to Escape W i ndow i n A.r_�ai�tment �#1 . Let�ter da�ted August 8, i 9�39. Case r�eso 1 ved, w i thdr wan. ---------------------------------- �9-t39-F 123 t7 Se 1 by Ave. Max B i x ( 1 apt . & Com' i ? APP�ARANCE : Max Bix SUBJECT: A�pellant is requesting a variance pertaining to having i�o provide one hour fire rated ceiliny in basement. Provide one hour� f i r e r-at.Pd door w i th hydrau 1 i c c 1 osures at. i nter i ar entrance to basem�r�t. L�tter dated August 3U, 1989 I'ROCEEUING5: l-he Appellant stated that the building now is vacant. Hope Abrams , fT,om Fire Prevention stated that if the building is vacant , then there are no code violations. BOARD ACTION : Motion made by Ron Glassman to deny the request for a variancz pertaininq to tr�e having to provide one hour fire r-atec� ceilirig in basement and providing one hour fire rated door clousur�es at interior entrance ta k�dsement, as long as the bu i 1 d i ng i s vacant, but. i f tt-�ere be a tenant. i n ttie bu i 1 d i ng, then the deficiency must. be corrected. Seconded by Bill Tilton. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 7 - C� 90 -� 105-8�-F 1 �77 Marshail Ave. Daniel L . Uren (3 un�its ) APPEARANCE : Daniel L . Uren SUBJECI-: Appellant i5 rec�uesting a variance on having to provide a secor�� ex i t from t.h i rd f 1 oar . Le�.ter �a�ted Ju 1 y 1 1 , 1 y89. PROCEEU T NGS: Appe 1 I ant stated �:hat. there i s a secc�nd ex i t tr-om the third floor, but it does not meet current cocie. BUARD ACTION: Motion made by Bill Tiiton to gr�ant a variance on the second exit fram third floor to be used as a second exii., even if it does not meet ali codes , as long as the rise and rung are modified to meet code. Seconded by Ron Glassman . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- 111-8y-F 43 E. Water Street Dennis Trooien (Com' 1 ) SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting an extension of time to reha�i or demolish the property; HRA has an option to purr_hase the property. Letter dated July 19, 1989. Case resolved, withc�rawn. ---------------------------------- 117-89-F 857 Payne Ave. Wiiliam Gydesen (Com' 1 ) 5LIBJECT: Appellant is requestir�g a variance on havina to provide spr i nk) er far b�sement or 20 squaz�e feet of open i ng �to the outside. Letter dated September 12 , 1989. �-�ostponed, working with Fire Prevention to try to res�lve code violations . ---------------------------------- h . �� 9� -`� i 1t-i-ri`3-F 6�� 1 R i ce S1_.t-E'Ct. NGWdT-Cl S. Bo i i ti-�c� (Corn' 1 > AFPEARANCE : Howard S. Bolitho SUBJECT: Appellant is reqesting a variance on a spr�y painting booth. Letter dated September 21 , 1�8y. PROCEEDINGS: 5herry Webb from Departrnent of Fire & Safety, stated that the building is not cert�ified as a body shop. The Appellant. does not have a iicense from the Citv of St. Paul t� do Auto Body work. C 1 ean uf� sho��s do not r�qu i re a L i cense. Mr�. �_jw?ris an Ins�ectc.�r from the Department of Fire 8 5afety inspected the t�� i Ii_�if-►��1 ir� �1!? ! , �j1 , 198y due to a complaint. Mr . Owens from the Department of Fir-e & Safety stat�d in lPtter to Sherry Webb, that when Mr. Owens visited the s9te, he made rnent i on tf�at. there was no spray booth on s i te. l"he comp 1 a i nt was discussed with the tenant . Mr . Owens stated to the tenant, that the spr��y pa i n�:i ng i ns i de the bu i 1 d i ng, out.s i de of an approved spray booth was prohibited. The tenant indicated to Mr. OwEns several times , durinq the visit that he does not. spray paint vehic: Ies ; al �o indicdt.ed that he does r�ot do body work, that he was only a clean up and detail shop. The Appellant stated that the only thing that he does not have is electrical ten feet off tr�e ground. This is the only thing that the Appellant cannot c:om�ly with, tr�e reason is that it not i n i�he bu i 1 d i nc7. Ms . Webh s�tated that there is no positive mechanical ventilation, on I y an exhaust far�. Ms. Webb st.ated that if the Appellant would like to paint more than engines , that he would have to write a letter to Ms . Webb, so �thdt. i t can be rev i ewed by the F i re Marsha 1 1 for Pi i s appt-ova 1 . l-he f3oard feels that they cannot grant a variance to continue the work, if the Appellant has no License to do body work. BOARD AC:Y I(�N: Mot i on made by B i 1 1 T i 1 ton to grant a va►� i ance for painting of engines , bumpers and wheels only, until such time that the Fire Marshall has ruled on the safet,y of painting of bumpers and wheels , if the Fire Marshall strongly ohjects, then the Appellant be allowed to r-eturn to the Board. Seconded by Ron Glassman. MOTION CARRIEU UNANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- �.a �� %o -�` 122-89-F 1201 Jackson St. Thomas J . Bell APPEARANCE : l-om Bell :�UBJECT: AppEllant is requesting a variance on having to provic�e one hour fire enclosure separation for first flaor furnace ber� ind bar . Letter dated August 31 , 1989 PROCEEDINGS: The Appellant stated that the building has been in existence for a�t least 25 years as a bar. -Ihe furnace is located in such a place that. it is almost impossibte to get near furnace arFa. It was discussed about. putting in d sprinklEr system. Mikz Ricket.son from the Department of Fire & Safety stated, that ir�ii� i�lly what was requested was a one hour fire rated ceiling and walls . Mr. Ricketson received a call from a contractor, who explained the difficulities to me, which was understood. because of limited space. At that time, I advised the contractor about maYbe putting in a sprinkler system over the furnace area. The contractor was going ta talk to the appeliant and then meet with me and the appellant . There is an appointment scheduled for November 15, 1989. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Bill Tilton to deny the request for a variance, instead, giv� the Appellant an extension of time untii October 1 , 19y0 t� insta�ll a sprinkler system. Seconded by Robert Viering. Mt�TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 12.3-8y-F 394 Dayton Ave. Thomas Sauro APPEARANCE : Tom Sauro & Ron Neujahr 5UBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance on the number of �ersons being allowed to live the tYie units (Overcrowding) . Letter dated September 21 , 198�. PROCEEDINGS: This is a 8 unit building, all one bedroom apartments. Pat Fish, from the Department of Fire 8� Safety stated that this is a common problem in 5t . Paul . 1-he Fire Marshall feels very strongly about overcr�wding, because of �the fire that occured in Public Housin�, here in St. Paul . 10 U �✓� Pat F i sh frorn the De�.�artment of= F i rz 8� Safety, stated that i t i s matter of getting people out , its too crowded & t.herE could be - lots of confusion . The inspector stated that she was cor�cerned a�out arnount. of people in the apartment.s . The units have smoke detectors, but are not hard wired. There are sprinklers over the furnace. 7he appeliant stated that the tenant in Unit #4 must move. BOARD ACTION : Motion rnade by Bill Tilton to deny the r�quest for a variance on overcrowding, with tr�e understanding that the tenants in Unit #6 move to Unit #3 , in addition, the Appellant. must notify the r,est of the tenants to comply by April 1 , 1990 . Seconded by Robert Viering. MOTION �ARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- Their being no further business the meeting adjourned at 4: U0 p.m. ---------------------------------- 11 , � 9�� r .�A.i t�i f PP.iJ� �UAKU OF A.i-'!='tAL�: � "N,�V i ENI 555 L. -C'C7c�i' Si.r�F?-t `�t. . Pau 1 , f1 i nn�sota , 5�� 1 U i ( � ! � ) 2y2-?775 rl i nut�s , Meet.i r,a o(= u�c�ernbe�- 1 :' . i'y�y 1�1Ef1BER:i NRESE�II- : F�or� G i assmar� , Cr,a i rman Rc�ri� i ci P,rikenv l�J i I 1 i��rn -i i 1 t.o n R�t_»t�t. V i f i- i ng U�I HE'RS PRE��t�!-I : Steve Ner�bert , Ra i n i eadrr' U i �� i s ?or� L� 1C�K Lipr_�ert , Nubi ir; heaii.i� Chuci�� Vo�te I , F'ur� I i c Hea i th Nat. r i sri, F i re a� �af=ety Depart.ment. �ci Gariyaw D i ck Pearsor� J i m Uam i an i Uona I d Hc�k��s Uar 1 er�e Ge i sness Kar I Wo I t Gha i rman G 1 assman ca i 1 ed the meet i r�c� -to ordez� at � : :35 r.m Dcceri�ber 1 Z, 19�y. He we i corned t.l��e Apf�e 1 l ar�ts arid exp 1 a i ned zne r-�rocedures , stat i r�g �tha�: what tt��e o�ard does i s.. i�ecommends ac�t i ar� t.o ti-�z C i ty Counc i 1 Mr . G 1 assman rererred to a i etter� from 5�teve Laccai��d, F i r-e Marsh� Il , wi-�erein , it st.ates "E1=fective November 22 . 1y88 , aI ? s i ne� i e fami I y homes i n 5�. . F�au I bu i i t. befoi�e 1 973 are re�7u i ►-ed t.o be f�rov i ded w i th on�: f�iaT�dw i red smoke dPtector� , i nsta I I eC outs i de the rna i n s 1 ezp i ng area . I n �ccordance w i t.h Char»..er- 5t3 of thF� L ea i s I dt i ve Code, t.l�e smoke dete�tar i nst.a i �ar i or� i � ��e�au i red when the home owner +�i 1 Ps a �I�rutf-� i n Hous i �� KeE�ort. . norma I 1 :� � n �-�repara-t i on for ttie sa I e af the home. There ha� been c�c�cas i ans �o c7ran� an exempt i on from th i s Urd i nar�ce , r"or� a nu�f��t+t- of T�easons . S�teve Zaccard , Fire Marshall is r�equestin� t.hat the Board gr�ant a b 1 anket var i ance i n 1�hes� c i r�cumst.ances t.e a 1 1 ow the F i re �iarsl�� 1 1 t.o gt-�ar�t exernr�t.i�n f��orn the or�cs i nance i-e�au i rc�rn�n�L unt i i the homE i s rnarketed, reduc�i nn tt-,e nur-:ber- o*= cases ti�at wou 1 ci riave to be heard before i:hE Bc�ar�_ " Cl��i rman G i assrnan moved t.0 a 1 1 ow ��he F i re Marsha 1 I t.a �7r-ar�t extmE��, i ans i n som� cases an har�d w i r�er_i. sn�o�*e rJetect.c�r-s . Cf-�a i rm�n G 1 dssrnan i nfai-med the Board th�t two r�e�� member5 r�avz �,een appo i nt�d and a Reso i ut i on f-.as L�een nre��ared to n��esen�. r.o t�t�ie C i �y Counc i I , at�C='r'�v i n<� �tt7e ar�;�ai ntments . I �l'r'.7-'C are �ame� Lau��t-� I i n , r E�-�i-esent.i ng t.f'!e E 1 er.,•tt' i ��a I P3"Of ESS i Or� and L�or�a 1 d we i �� . re4�rFSeni. i n� Uener� I C i t. i zentry. i � C� Q�-�5 C :. _ . . , �_f.l:y I !Illi_1C1 �7 � �_i'?��Ili�f�l (IIE'f tr, i r.,r-�'r.t_1 t.�=) tf IN �'i�):�1 C1. 1 7�. 1^/��: t�?i r_;t_lGlir t!_? I� i s �1_.'t.er�� i n�i i:.rl��l': t.f-ie �o�t�G �,f LO!l i Cl�a c:l-i�r��e� r��tvy�rn � i i u . Oi:) �nd $ i �iU . UC1 i-cJT' f ? I i n�.� �n a��i�a i wi T.h �t.h� �<�n i nc� �ic�ar_+. . i t�e ��ard Of' ,4�{�C� � 5 i5� h:!='V I CW tOr �f-?r? riOl,fS i f-li7. �3U'i I ci i ng an�.� h' 1 t��? f-;t_'E,V�1"tt. l'r�r� i_QC��-'� Ofl I Y Ctl�t_��F?ti � 1 (_I . lJ�) , ci f'CE' Lrl�f". rl�� 7�E:Il Sr-�t. SC�ffIP y_P,c3i"S dU0 and ha� never bee�-� in .r.r�:,�sed. How c�oes tl��e tiodrd fi�e ! au�uiv , rnayk�e, I�av i n�a �rf��e Boarc9 sugge5t °��.o tl��e Cour�c i i ti-iat. the t=ee fOT� f" 1 i i n� an ar�pea i �;h-�ou1 d k:�c i ncreased�: I�t was suUaested, �tl��t tp,er�e be a fer for „Owr'�er� Ciccu�.�i �d" anc� anatY�ei� i=ee <�� „t�ion-Owner �ic�u�� i �d" . -I�he suc�g�5t i or� was d f I dt fee or �25. UU. ivli- . V i rr i nca, tit,a�teu t"r��7-. 1�.r�eY,e i s sc�rne rnr:r i t. i r� ra i � i na t.he f�e. Tl�er e i s a I c�t. oF t.i rn� i nvo i ve.ci i r� r,��epar i n�a tF�ie r�at!er w��i-k . I nspec t.oi�s rea��r�n��i nc7 �L.i-�e i r� t. i me so as rv apF�ear- befiore tt��i s Board to repre5er�t. tf-�e C i tv. Aft�r muc'r-� d i s�:uss i an . Mot i on was m�de bv B i 1 i T i i �con t.o make a re��ue5�l: t:o tl�ie C i t�� Coun�i i cc�i-�s i der i ng i nc��eas i r�g tt-�e F i 1 i r�c� Fee ±�o t.i��e Board of Apr�ea 1 s & R�v i ew T=rom $ 1 U . U� 1�0 �25 . 00 . �ECOric1��! �v Roneld Ankenv. MOTIUN CAkRIEU UhdANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- i . Api�rova 1 c�f ti��e h�ar i nc� and adv i sor y ru I i i��c�s or fi.he Aci Noc meet i r��g of= t.hE Novernb�r' 1 %�» 1 �3£i9. Mot i on rn�de by kal�er-t V i er i n�� to appr-ove thz ac1= i ons of t17� hear i ng and aciv i 5ory ru I i ngs of� t.he Ac� Hoc: mePt i nct. ��c.onded !�y Rc�n G I assmar� . MU-f�i GN CAkk 1 EU UNAN I MUUSL'Y . 2 . Appi��va 1 of= �t.i��e rn i nutes ot= -r.f�e Uctober 1 U , 1 989 and November 14 , 1 989 rneet i rig �s subm i tted i,n wr i t i nq. Mc.�t i on rnade by R<�n G ! as5man t� approve the rr�i �ut.es ofi thP UctobFr 1 Ci , i `��39 rneet=i n�� as subm i t�tE.d. SecondPd bv B i I 1 �f i 1 tor�. MOT I UN CAF�R I ED UNAN! NIOUSLY . Mo�t i on rn�de by E�i i I �f i 1 t.on to appr�ive the m i nutes of the Novernbec- 1 4 , 1 989 mee�t.i na w i rhi tfie fo 1 1 c�w i ng cori-eet i on ; On pa�e 2 , under� "Board Ac�� i on'" , th i rd I i r�e, after t►ie date "October i , 199U , " delet.e the vear " ly9U" ana ins�rt. „ I yy i ",-- SFC�i-�d�d t�y kona I c� A��keri.Y. MO-I"I OI� LARR 1 E:D UNANIMOUSL'Y . ---------------------------------- G � -v c� w c�c� �- o C'� . rn� = � � GZ z -� -< z cn-r � v� -~-�°r c r:.3� ra -< m a' r�D � � _ —1 X �D -S D• -S �n r � rn c � r m N n � '_' W G � � !� l� � O � l�n � ru � � � n �* v r• O N � c� � � O .�. rn � � o � � m � n � 3 � N O m �..,, � � � � o � � c z -� � w -< �, � a� � � . � c p r• � � £ � H � � � � � !D �(1, (D �� N �.:� �'fi '�� _,r.,,.:�,.._ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ �a � � -- � � 2555049 ��c��u� r�a. ..�,.___�._. n'� f��FtGE C0. R£C+ORDEFt � �'` CERT REC�RDED Oty � V �� , .�ut Z� I i lo Q1� • \ � � � �-�� McKEM#�� `�1tt��y n �� c�' 1 iy cr��u ��"� Q � • 1 T.., f t. L7 �., . �. . L7 ;� � STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) ss. CITY OF SAINT PAUL ) I� . . . . . Albert. B.. Olson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .City Clerk of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the attached copy of Council File No. , , 90-45. as adopted by the City Council. . . , January. 9:. . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 90. . , , January 10: and approved by the Mayor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. . . . . . with the original thereof on file in my office. I further certify that said copy is a true and correct copy of said original and the whole thereof. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota this , . , , . 3rd. _ . . . , day of � .July. . . . . . . , . . . .A.D. 19 90• , . . . . Lr��U.x!u:�. .. �-/. .�. .�'�,�,�,2�r�. . . . . . . . . City Clerk. � � . -.l:��K.�. ' , :,,):. :. . �� . h��7 ��° +; . . �;�� ' �ur�� 0 �`�� ^�/ f� T✓' �". ... . �., �� T,� : F- � ,,��l�'� � �?",.;�, '%�: �� . / �; ` �1..� - ,��.... � 1��1Q � .� � C 6 � �1�� .. r,,� " ;� = 1 1 . _ ' � �Q'� . ' v a 2555049 � �\ � c �,� �. ' d0: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 11, 89-F 1977 Marshall Ave. Daniel L. Oren BOARD AC'� _ .�nted a variance on second exit from third _oor to be used as a second exit, as long as the ise & rung are modified to meet code. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOIV: Merriam' s Rearrangement of Blocks 24, 25 , 26 , 27, 28 & 29 Merriam park W. 10 Ft of Lot 8 and all of Lot 7 Blk 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2- � !\�\U v \` � 1 � � � �� 1 1� � � � . (.��a-�s 2555049 �74`�1 B�T A S�.I I�1'r PAiJL 't3�JARU Ur A"r'NEALti & �:�V i tW 555 Cedar- 5t.ree� 5a i r�t Pau i , M i nnesoT.� 55 ! C� i NI i nutes , hleet. i ng c�f� Novernber ! 4 . i 98u i�ItMBER:� �-��'.�S�tJ-f: N�on G l assman, CP��a i rrnan Wi 1 I ianz � . T�i Itan Robert. V i er i n�•t MEMBER� AB��NT: Ror�aid Ankenv OTHERS PkESE(�li: Nat Fish, Fire Preventio� Hope Abr-ams . F� i re PrevenL i on M i ke R i c:ke�tson . F i re Pi-ev�nt i on 5'rierrv Webb. F i r� Prevznt. i on Maynard Vinge. Public NealLh t�aro! yn Sher�parc. Pub ! i c Hea 1 tl�� 5teve Herbert,R� inleader Uivision Prii 1 Ethier , Ser�:er Div. , N.W. Joe Ehrlich , B. i .D .D . James Pi erce -l�t-��ma5 Sauro E . J . Ganyaw Nf�x Bix Daniel L . Uren James Ray Steve Kap 1 an Howard S. Bo I i tf-�o Jane Gmur Jor�n FeiabrueqQe rhomas Lieberman Thomas Bell Ron Neujahr Tt��e fo I 1 aw i na two cases wEre heard at tPie meet i ng of Oct�ber 1 U , 1989 meeting. Afte�, much discussion d vo�l.e was taken and it ended u� to �e a tie vote. Chairman Glassman stated that Mr. -f i 1 ton wf�� was not at t!-�P meEt i ng of October 1 U , 1989 , shou 1 d hear �he cases . ther� his vote would break the tie; lUb-89-F �788 Curfew 5t. Jarnes M. Ray APPEARANCE : James M. Ray SUBJEC7: Appr�llant is recluestina a variance on havin� to provide an escare window in 2nd floor sleepina r�oom. Lette►- dated August 11 . 1989. PROCEEDING5: Mr. Rav stated that. when the house was remod�led 15 years ago the w i r�dow ttiat �ras �i nsta 1 1 ed i n ihe the second fi�or bedroom was intended to be uno�enable. Mr. Ray installed a ventilation system that is a sealed atmosphere. Mr-. Ray i nformed Mr . T i 1 ton of a 1 etter f r�om Mr . ArnEy, where i �. i t. states " I was the Building Inspector� f�or 788 Curfew at the time the unopenable wir�dows were instali �d. Tr�e Uivisions director a�t th�3t t i me rnacle an except i on , i n th i 5 c:ase, anci d i rzcted rne to a��pr-�ove the wark on the grounds of tne mecl�an i ca 1 vent i I at i on system and the convenience of tl�e si�airway to the bedroom door and the fact that. i t 1 ea�is d i rect.l v t.o tf�e outs i de. " i he 1 etter was dated Ucto�ier� 6 , 1989 and s i gned by R i ct'iard L . Amey, Superv i sor- of I nspectors . � , . . � . �j= �a -�� 2555049 Mr . R i cketson, from tne Uepartrnent of F i re anci 5afety �r�esented a 1 et�ter frorn the F i re h1ar5ha 1 1 , where i n , i t refers to the r�eq�.� i rprnent.s , rec�ard i ng tfie w i ndoHr, wh i ch i s �i rect I y firom L i t� Safiet�, Code , c 1 ear and ex�1 i c i�L. Tl��e F i re f1arst-�a I 1 1"�V 1 EW�C� the Cod? �'O see i f any reso 1 ut i on cou 1 d t�e rrached y pr�i ot- to attend i n� �tt-�� me��:i na. Trie co�ie i s c 1 e�r , i n that . wt�c:n �there i s a hnuse w i ti� aut a�>enavle winduw5 , t.hat. poses a i.i-iread. After the Octuber meet. ing , wt�en Mi� . R i cKe�t son was rnad� aware of �.he 1 etter fr��m Mi�. Arnev . !vir . R i cke�l.s�n r�etui�ned to tf��e of-�f i ce to researc:t� the f i ► es foi� � 1 eti��r fi-orn h�ir . Arr�ey. 71�et-e i s i-�o corr�spondence i n tne f i l es ti-�ai: r�e�er� -�.:o d var ia!-�ce. hir- . -t'i 1 ton , ask�d Mr . R i cketson i f Llze w i ndow had been measurec to seF wt-�a�t. the anenan i e s��ce wou 1 d b�! Mr . R i r.ketson state�, the f�ct tt��at the w i ndaw dc�es nc�r oper� . mak�s i�l. i mpass i b 1 e to measut-�e tl-�e openab 1 e s i ze . BY 1�ok i na at i�t , i t cloes nat. appeer to be 1 arc�e enough. M�,. "f i 1�ton sungesteca that maybe there i s a casernent w i nc±ow tha� cou 1 d be i nsta I ] ed from the i ris i de, so as not to have eY�t;ens i ve re�-�a i rs from tf�e ou-r_.s i ae, wfi i c:h cou 1 ci be i nsta 1 1 ed to rnee�l. cade. BOARD ACTION: Motian rnade by Bill Ti1LOn to deny the request ror a variance, instead grant an extension of time far tw� years , (Uctover 1 , 1990) , with tr�e understanding tP�at a casement w i ndow Ve i nsta 1 i ed �t'r�a�L w i 1 1 f i t the open i ng. wh i ch i s a�:cep�tab�l e to the F i re Departrnent. Let �tY��e records show that Mr . V i e�-i ng and Mr. G 1 assman voted against ti��e motion at the Oci:ob�r 10 , 1989 meeting, but now agree with thE ex�l.ension of time. This is an extension of the Uctober 10, 1989 meetinq finaiizing the meeting and this has r�o connecl:ion to the November 19�9 meeting. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 11U-89-F �0/2$ St. Albans St. Steve Kapian APPEARANCE : Steve Kaplan & Jane Gmur SUBJECT:_ A�pellant is requesting a variance on having to provide wir�d g�lass in doors . Letter� dated April 25 , 1989. PROCEEDINGS: Appellant stat�d th�t the tenants in t.r,e building feel that the windows in the voors are just too beautir"ul to be covered by wir�ed ylass . B i �I I 1-i I tor�, suc�gested that rnaybe a cornprom i se cou i d �e N�orked out to r�ave the appe 1 I ar��t i nsta 1 1 c 1 ear tempered �1 ass ovvr tl�e present wir�dows in doors. � 2 , . � � , ��--� 2555049 P�t F i sh, frc�m JepcaT"�tlllzt��. V� F i re & Safei.y StatPC1 �tY-�at. t.t-�ere i s c 1 ea�- t.ern�ered y 1 ass ava i 1 ab 1 e, thai:. c�u 1 d be approved l�y the f i re depsrtrnent . BOAF:D AC:��i U�l : Mot i oi-� rnac!� by f3 i 1 I �i i i ton t� den,y tf�� re��uest ror � var �i an�.e c�n t.he a� i r ed g 1 ass w i ncl��w, i r�stcad granted an exter,s i on of t i me ror 30 ti�ys t.c� work w i tr? DepartmFnt. of F i r�e � Safety to work out a v i af7 I e so I ut i on �Lo put. i n a��ravef� n i ass �i n �loor w i ncloN�s , i f-- nat , then Appe 1 1 ant to returr� to tt�e December 12 . I 9b9 rnee�.i n�. Thi s � i sa i s � cdrry over from t.r�A October 1 G, i 98y m��t i r,a. Tf�e act i on c:,n ti�i s c�se wi 1 I a 1 so f i na i i�e ti�e Ucivoba*- rne�t i ng. M+�.��T i U(�i CAF:R I EU UNAN I MOUSLY . ---------------------------------- Cha i rrr�an G 1 assman i nfarmed the A�pe 1 1 ants that tt��z Boai�d 1 acks a quorurn. Paul Mc�losk�y, the Boards Lec7ai Advisor , advised the Board to act as a Committee of tr�e Board, to 7-ender advisory o`�i n i ons. 1 ett i ng �tr�� a�{�e 1 1 dnts knoHr tnat any op i r� i on that i s expressed today. is likely to b� ratified by the Board at the mEeting in December . If an1� one is agc�rieved by the decision of the Boar,d today. �.hey wou 1 d have �i�he r i ght i�o returri ta t.he next meeting and plead his/her case the second t�ime. 1 . Appr-c>va 1 of �,I�e mi nutes of the Octobcr, 1 U, 1989 rneet i ng as submi�tt�� in writina. Because of a iack of a c�uorurn, the minutes of the Uc-to�er lU > 19$9 meeting were r�ot approvzd, they will be approved at the December ?2 � 1989 meet.iny. � ---------------------------------- L. CA5E HEARII�GS : CASE NU: F'ROPERTY APPEALEU APPELLANT 90-88-H 1749 W. Minnehaha Ave. E . J . Ganyaw ( 1 unit) AAPPEARANCE : E . J . Ganyaw SUBJECT: App�llant is requestina a vaz-�iance from St. . Paul Leq�islative CodE 41 . 03 pertaining to disconnection of the rainleaders. PROCEEDINGS: The Appellant had been befoT�e the Board 13 months ago, at which time i�t was sugqested that� the City go out to the property and do a soii test. -�he Appellant stated that this was ncver done. The ldnd slopes towat�ds the h�use. Mr. 5teve Her bert, frc�rn the Ra i n 1 eader C�i v i s i on statecJ that tt-ic t_i ty ci�es r�ot du s�i 1 tesjvs . Ht a 1 �c> stated tt-�at tr�er�E w{?u 1 d b� no problem if the r-ainleaders were disconnected, then reroute the gutters . � � . . . . . �Q�� 5 2555049 Mr�. T i 1 tc�n suggested that ti��e �-a i n i eaders cou I d be r-erouted at 1 eas-t 2U fee�. . a 1 so by ad�.�i nc� some f i 1 1 and new sod, to s i C�pe t.f�e 1 ar��d awav fir om �r�e house. BOAF�� ACTIUN : Motion made by Biil Tilton to deny the request fi0t- a vai�i ance on �.t��e ra i n 1 eaders . Seconded by RoL,er-t V i er�i ng. MU-f I ON i�ARR I ED L1NAN I M��USLY . Mr. E . J . Ganyaw . becaus� of a lack of a c�u�rum, requestcd to retur-n i�o tt��e meet i r�g i n Uecemk��er , 1 989. ---------------------------------- 1 1 4-89-R 6U3 hii. . Curve B 1 vd. Dona 1 d J . B��uwn (: 1 unit.) SUBJECT: Appe i 1 ant. i s r-equest i ng a var i ance rr-om St. Pau l Legislative Code 41 . 03 �ertaining t� disconnection c�f= tr7e ra i n 1 eacier�s . Postpor�eci ta the January 9, 1990 meetina. ---------------------------------- llb-89-H 707 Prebie Joseph Haines (2 unit�) APPEARANCE : None SUBJECT: Appeilar�t is re�uesting an exzension of time to do the necessary repairs after exterisive fire damage. Letter dat.ed 5ep�:ember- 1 , 1989. Maynard Vinge, frorn Uivision of P�blic Health stated triat he heard from the tenants that the bu i 1 d i ne� has been so 1 ci. Notf-�i ng F�as been f i xed. Mi- . V i r�ge has the narne of the new owner and an addr-ess to be able to contact the persc�n. The front entry does not necessarily need repairs immediatel .v, .just very unsiightly. The upstairs and the first floor unit havE other means of entering or leaving the building. BOARD ACTIUN : Motion made by Ron Glassman to deny the rP�auest for an extension of time. Secondzci bv Bill Tiltor�. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMUUSLY . ---------------------------------- � 4 . � . �� 2555049 . i c1�-89-H ��S`� E�c i i �l S't. JO't�r� P. Fe i cit�r,ueUUe ( 1 unit) SUBJEC�f: Appellant is re�{uesting a variance or� t.he wark orders F.�eri:a i n i n�� t.o appearance of th� gai�age; as thE work hds been done and neecis no fiur�ther wark. Letter da�t.eu Octobcr 2 . 198`�+ . Case resoived. BUARD A��-f I U�v : Mot i on mdde Vv B i i T i I To� t.o refur�C tl-�� f i i i r�g f ee o*= � 1 �. OU . 5econde��i k��y Robert V i er i na. �UT !UN C:Ak�i EU UNANIh10USLY . ---------------------------------- !Z1 -89-H 16Q5 Selbv Ave. Thomas Lieb�rmann c1 unit) . A�PEARANCE : TFiornas L i ek�errndnn tiUBJEC:T: Appe 1 1 ant i s appea 1 i ny the "t�{ot.i ce of Conden�nat.i on" . Le�i�er� vated Oct.ober 4 » 1 yt�y. � F'ROCEEUINU5: The Ap��ellant stated that the buildina was purcl�idsed 5 years ago on a Contract for Ueed. lhe owners on both sidrs ofi tP�e t�uilding would like to purchase the buiiding, apparently they are hdrassing me. Befare put�chasing the building, I contacted i.he C i i�y, I d� not rernember whorn I ta i ked to, buz they sa i d evert'r�i ng was fine. Car-olyn Sheppard, fr�rn Public Health stated that this is a �_c�rnmer� i c:a 1 Uu i 1 �_i i r�y. M_,. ��1-rrp��rc! i � �'��t. t_lr�i r �k_,i � t�� irt. i r-, �S? ti-�e bu i 1 d i ng to ver i fy thai� i t i s acceptab 1 e for res i dent i a 1 usE. The statemPnt that Ms . Sheppard made to Mr. Liebermanri was , " If sr�e was unable to entEr the building for an inspECtion an the interior, tt-�en it would be inspected from the exterior. " wf��ic� is w t P�1s . �i��eppard d i d. There i s not suff i c i ent 1 i aht and ven�. i 1 at i on for, a res i dent i a 1 bu i 1 d i ng. Mr . Liebermann stated that he lives in the building, also use� ii for his office. Joe Ulz�ich, from thE Zoning Der�artment, si.ated that from a zoning standpo i nt, tl-�e pra�erty i s zoned B-2 bus i ness propEr�t.y. Regulai�ion states , that no more -than 50% of the ground floor may be used for residential , and that is the reason why Zor�iny n�eds to get i nto tP�e b�i I d i ng to ver i fy �Lh i s. Ctia i r-rnar� G 1 assmar� , stated that the i ssu� t�ere i s , the fact tr�at the i r�spect�rs wou 1 d 1 i ke to get. i n t,o i ns�ect t.he propert�/. Chairman Glassrnar� suggested to the Appellant that he work with i:.he inspectors , so as to arrange for them to get into the �,ui1dina for an inspection. � r-, � . � . �� 2555049 Joz U 1 r i cf�, from Zon i nq re�auested that Appe 1 1 ant set a date i�o meet w i ti�i the Appe i I ant . l-he date thai wa� s�g��ested Hias Mor�day i�ovember 2U , 1989 ai: 8: 00 p.m. BOARD ACT I ON : Mo�L i on macie by E3 i 1 1 7 i i ton to grant an extens i on c�f t i rn� unt i 1 hiovernber 20, 19�39, wi ti-� the und�rst�nd i n� �.tiat the Appellant. meEt with the Inspectors from Zoninc� and Health De��at-tment to i nspec:t the i nter i or, to determ i ne i f the bu i i d i n� i s uf-� �to c.a�e, t.o work out a v i at�l z so 1 ut i c�n, i f no�t. �the A��pe i 1 ar�t. cou 1 d r,etui-r� to tl-�e rr?eet i r�g i n L)eccmber , i fi need L�e . S�cor�deci by R�n G i assrnar�. MO-( I UN CARR I EU UNAIv i NfUUSLY . ------------------------=--------- 124-8y-H 113U Forest St. Stephen C. Uiar:/Har�ld Conick (� un i-ts) Tom Ue 1 V�cch i o, At.i.y at Law SUBJEC-f: Appel �lant. is appealing the condemnatian and order to vacate prem i ses . Letter �iateci Uctor��r 17 , 1989. Case r�eso 1 ved, W i thcirawn. ---------------------------------- 86-89-F 771 W. Tth St , James PiercF . (Cammerical ) APPEARANCE : James Pierce SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variancE on the requirement of having to Provide Autamatic Fire Extinguistiing System in Spray Boa�:1� and Spray Booth Ventilation 5ystem must inciude Make-Up Air unit. �etter dat.ed July 21 , 1989. PROCEEUINGS: Shzrry Webb, from Uepartment of Fire & Safety stated that Lhe Building Department did tr►e inspection. The Building DepartmEnt will r�ot approve the booth because it. was put in without permits . What the Fire Uepdrtment would like to recommend is to make the area, a limited spray area, because the Appellant sprays very few vehicles parts a Year. He has ventilation in the area. -fhE Board could grant a variance for a limited spray area, even though there was no permit taken out. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Ron Glassman to grant a variance an the �resent booth in tt�e building to be allowed to be used as a lirnited spray area, as is , even though it was built witfiout a �erm i t. 5ecc�nded by B i 1 1 f i 1 tort. MQ7 I C�N CAF�R I EU lJhl,�h1 I Mc�USLY . ---------------------------------- l � 6 � . � �a � �5 2555049 8t�-89-F ��j 1 F i 1 1 m��re Ave. E . U�r�a 1 d -►. Br-�i gl-�tt�i I I ( ! unit) SUBJECT: Appeilant. is rec�uesting a variance or� the Pit Ventilation for Vat�or removal . LettPr dated ,Ju? y 1i3 , 198u. Case Resolved, withdrwan. ---------------------------------- y1-�9-F 420 S. Hamiii-�e Ave. Lais B. JacoVs (3 units) SUBJECT: Ap�.�ellant. is requesting a variance pzrtaini ►-�g to Escape W i ndow i n A.r_?ari�ment #�1 . Lel�ter da�ted Au��ust 8, 1989. Case resol ved, w i thcir4ran. ---------------------------------- 99-£39-F 1 Z30 Se 1 by Ave. t�lax B i x ( 1 apt . & Com' I ) APNEARANCE : Max Bix SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance pertaining t.� having to pr�ov i de one f�our f i re rai:ed ce i 1 i ng i n basement. Prov i de one hour� f i ►�e 1-�atFd door w i th hydrau 1 i c c 1 osures at. i nter i or entrance to basement. L�tter dated August 3U, 1989 PROCEEDINGS: l-he Appellant stated that the building now is vacant. Hope Abrams , fi�om Fire Prevention stated that if the building i5 vacant, then there are no code violations . BUARD ACTION : Motion made by Ron Glassman to deny the reques-c for a varianc� pert.aining to the having to pravide one hour fire r-atec� ce i 1 i ng i n bas�ment and prov i d i na one hour f i r,e rated door clousures at interior entrance to basement, as lon�a as the building is vacant, but. if there be a tenant in ttie building , then the deficiency must be corrected. Seconded by Bill Tilton. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMUUSLY . ---------------------------------- 1 � � . - . � � � �o -`�s 2555049 105-8�-F 1y77 Mai�shail Ave. Daniel L . Oren (3 units) APPEARANCE : Daniel L . Uren SUBJECT: Appellant is requestinc� a variance on having to provide a second exit from third floor . Lei�ter da�ted Jul ,y 11 , 1989. PR�CEED I NGS: Appe 1 I ant stat.eci �.hat. triere i s a second ex i t fir�am the third fioot- , but it does not rneet current code. E�UARD ACTION : Motion made by Biil Ti �iton to arant a variance on the second exit from third floor to be used as a secand exiL , even if i�t does not mee�t all codes , as long as the rise and runa are moclified to meet code. Seconded by Ron Glassman. M�l-ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- 111-8y-F 43 E. Water Street Dennis Trooien (Com' 1 ) SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting an Extension of time to rehab or demolish the property; HRA has an option to pur-chase the propprty. Letter dated Jul .v 19, 1989. Case resolved, withcirawn. ---------------------------------- 117-89-F 857 Payne Ave. William Gydesen (Com' 1 ) 5UBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance on having to provide s�r i nk i er far basement or 20 s��uai�e feet of open i ng -to the outside. Letter- dated September 12 , 1989. ��ostponed, working with Fire Prevention to �ry to resoive code violations . ---------------------------------- /� t� , �r �o --� 2555049 1 1�-�°3-F �:�� 1 R i c:e Street. Hc��a,-�_i S. B�� I i-r.t-�c� (Corn' 1 ) APPEARANCE : Howard �. Bolitho SUBJECT: Appellant is reqesting a variance on a spr�y painting booth. LEtter dated September 21 , 1989. PROCEEDINGS: 5herry Webb fram Departrnent of Fiz-e & Safet.y, stated that thz builving is r�ot cert�ified as a body shor�. The Appellant. does not have a license from the Cii.y of St. Paul to do Auto Boc.ly work. Clean u� shops do not r�quire a License. Mr. �_?wrn5 an Inspector frorn the Department of Fire 8� 5afety inspected the t_,�ii Irlitl�i i :r-i ,1►ii ±� :� 1 , �989 due to a complaint. Mr . C�wens from the Departmeni. of F i t-e 8� Safety statzd i n 1 et.Ter to Sherry Webb, th�t when Mr. (�wens visitzd the site, he made rnention that. there was no spray booth on site. Thz complaint was discussed with the tenant. Mr . Owens stated to the tenant, that tf��e spray pa i n�:i ng i ns i c�e the bu i i d i ng, outs i de of an approvEd spray booth was prohibited. The tenant indicatEd to Mr. Owens several times , c�uring the visit that he does not. spray paint veF� i c:l es ; a�I �o i nd i catEd that t�e �oe5 not do body work, that he was only a clean up and detail shop. The Appellant stated that the only thing that he does not have is electrical ten feet off the ground. This is the only thing that the Appellant cannot comply with, the reason is that it not in 1:he bui lding. Ms . Webb s�tated that tf�ere is no positive mechanical ventilation, only an exhaust far�. Ms. Webb stated that if the Appellant would like to paint more than engines, that he would have to write a letter to Ms. Webb, so �that it can be reviewed by the Fire Marshall for his app��oval . 7he Board feels that they cannot grant a variance to continue the work, if the Appellant has no License to do body work. BOARD ACT10N: Motion made by Bill Ti, lton to grant a variance for painting of engines , b�mpers and wheels only, until such time that the Fire M�rshall has ruled on the safety of painting of bumpers and wheels , if the Fire Marshall strongly objects, then the Appellant �e allowed ta r-eturn to the Board. Seconded by Ron Glassman. NIOTION CARRIEU UNANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- /� �a . C''� �� _`� 2555049 122-89-F 1201 Jackson St. 7homas J . Bell APPEAP.ANCE : l-om Be 1 1 SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance on having to provi�e one hour fire enclosut-e separation for first floor furnace behind bar . Letter dated August 31 , 1989 PROCEEDING5: The Appellant stated �:hat the buildin� has been in existence for at least 25 ye�rs as a bar. -fhe furnace is located in such a place that it is almost impossibie to get near furr�ace area. It was discussed about putting in a sprinkler system. Mike Ricketson from the Department of Fire 8 Safety stated, that inii� ially what was requested was a one hour fire rated ceiling and walls . Mr-. Ricketson received a call from a contractor, who explained the difficulities to me, which was understood, because of limited space. At that time, I advised the contracfior about maybe puti�ing in a sprinkler system over the furnace area. The c:ontractor w�s going ta talk to the appellant and then meet with me and the appellant. There is an appointment scheduled for NovEmber 15, 1989. 130ARU ACTION: Motion made by Bill Tilton 1:o deny the request for a variance, instead, givz the Appellant an extension of time until October 1 , 1990 to install a sprinkler sys�.em. 5econded by Robert Vier�ing. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . ---------------------------------- 123-89-F 394 Dayton Ave. Thomas Sauro APPEARANCE : Tom Sauro & Ron Neujahr SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance on the number, of persons being allowed to live the the units (Overcrowding) . Letter dated September 21 , 1989. PROCEEDINGS: This is a 8 unit building, all one bedroom apartments . Pat Fish, from the Depar�ment of Fire � Safety stated that this is a common problern in St. Paul . l-he Fire Marshall feels very strongly about overcr�wding, because of �the fire that occured in Public Housing, here in St. Paul . �� 10 ��Q�� ssso4� Pat F i sh frorn th� De��ar,tment �i= F i rz & Safety, stateci that i t i s matter af getting people out , its too crowded 8 t-here could k�e lots of confusion. The inspector stated that she was cor�cerned about arnour�t of peo�1 e i n the apartment.s . The units have smokz detectors , but are not hai�d wired. There are sprinklers over �the furnace. The appellant stated that thz tenant in Unit ##4 must move. BOARD A�l-ION: Motion rnade by Bitl Tilton to deny the request for a variancE on overcrowding, wi�l.h tPie understanding that the tenants in Unit #6 move to Unit #3 , in addition, the Appellant must natify the rest of the tznants to comply by April 1 , 199U . SecondEd by Rvberi: Viering. MOTIUN (:ARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- Their being no further business the meeting adjournzd at 4 : U0 p.m. ---------------------------------- / `� 11 , , � � � �� ' 2555049 9� � � �i��T A :��.i !�i�l� PP.U� �OA.�U U{� APN'tA.L� � "N.��I� ��rl 55� Cedat- St.reet `:it . Nau i , hi i nn�s��ta , ��> 1 0 i ( 6i � ? <<32-7775 NI i rlut�s , Me�t i r�ci ofi uec.embe>' ! � . !'y�u IhE�1aER�� N(�ESE�iI" : F�'or, Giassrnan, Ci.�airrnan Ror�a i ci P.nkenv t�Ji I 1 iam -fi 1LOn kor_��i't V i e�� i na U�l-H�RS fJRE5EN7 : �1=.eve Herbert , Ra i n I e�=�der U i �� i s ;o�, L� i c:k L i pr_-�et�t , Pub i i�: Hea i i.ii Ct�uci�� Vo�te I , F'u� 1 i c Hea i L'n Pat. F i st�. F i r� � adfP.Ly OepartmGnt. Ed Gar�vaw L:�i ck Pearsor, J i m Garn i ar� i Go��a I � Hobbs Uarler:e Geisness Karl Wolfi C�hair�man �lassm�r� cai l �d the mr.etin� �to orcez� at � : 3�:: r�.r�� Oeceri�ber 12, 198y. He we 1 camed tl�e A�-�r-�e 1 �ar,ts and exp 1�i ned tne ��T�ocedures , stat i r�� t.ha� wi-i�t tr��e ooard eoes i s_. i-ecc�mn�ends ac�t i on t.o tl-�e C�tv C�unc i 1 Mr. G 1 assrnan rer"erreci to a i etter from Steve "Laccar�a, F i ;-e Mar�sha 1 1 , wl-�ere i n , i t sta�.es "Effeci�i ve Nc�vernbEr �2 . 1988, a I ? s i r�n i e fam i i y hiomes i n S� . F'au I bu i i t. befoi�e 19/3 ar e i�e��u i r-ed �.o be prov i ded wi th one f�ai-dw i red smoke detector- , i ns�.a I I ed outs i ce the rna i n s 1 e�p i ng area. I n �ccordance w i t.h Cha,r_�i.er 58 of tt�e L eg i s 1 at i ve Cod�, tl�e smakz detector i nsta 1 i aT i c�n i � t-e�au i re� w!�Pn the home owner f i 1 es a l�ruth i n Hous i �a MeporL . no�-ma i 1�:� � n prepara�tion for the sale af the home . There has been occasians to clr-ant an exempt i on from th i s Urd i nance , r"�r a rlu��t�t- Of reasons . S�teve Laccard , Fii�e Marshall is req�estin� triat the B�ard gr-ar►t a b 1 ankei: var i ance i n these c i r�c�mstances tc a 1 10�•: the F i re �iarsl�a 1 1 to gr�ant exempt i on fi-orn tr�e �r�ci i nance z-etau i r-�rn�n�, unt i I the horne i s marketed, reduc�i nn tri� n��r�:�er or cases ti�at wou�I d havz to be lieard before the Baard. " Ct�ia i rman G 1 assrnan moved to a 1 I ow �tt�e F i r-e Mar-sl-�a 1 I t.o nr-ar;T � exernpt i ans i n som� c�ses on har•d wi rer_i. smo�:e cietECtors . Cl��a i rm�n G 1 assrnan i nf�=�med ti�e Board tt��t. two r�ew members r�ave �,een ap�ointe�i and a Resolutiori t-ias L�een preparec+ to ,_r.i�esent t.o tt��e C i ty Caunc i I , at�f'T'ov i r�g �t.r�e a��r�oi r�tmenr� . i��er��e are �ame.� Lau��f-� I i n, re�t�esent.i n�t �Lt-�e E 1 ec.•tr i ��a 1 Pro'ress i on and Dor�a 1 � We i d� , reE�1�FSerii. i n� Venera 1 C,i � i zentry. ( � i � _ — �� o_�� 2555049 ��.fl�_! I i filc7tl (7 ( fi`i�;(II�JI� (IIt='I'lr. ?�)��t;t_1 t.t_1 tr"�E� �i�j�� [.�, l ��. ti"li:�� UI ii�_l�=1�1?-. t.!] rl 1 S ai:.tent i n!i 1�1'1�"C tll� �O�I,C� i�� !C�rl I fl'� Cll�?�C7Cti C_�P�N�r�rt�l � 1 1 U . IJL� cif I�� + ! %i() . C1(_) �"Ut' f? � 1 11�_I ��t cl��i�� H!1 T.rl 't�flF' L'O!'1 I t?C! �Odl"'C�. 1 flt=' �c��l"Cl ��t AN��ed 1 5 � h:rV I CW ror tl�� Hc�us i r��, Bu i 1 ��i ri� and F i re Fr-�venr i��ri Codes �n l y C:t�:�c_,�� i 0. tlti ; a ree r.r��at har_1 rieen set 5omr year� ago �nd r��s nev�r b�e�� i n�re��s�ci. How caoes tl�� Bo�rd fiee I al�ou� , rnayL�e, t-�av i na ti-,� B��ar�J s!�a�e5t T.:.v tt-ie Cour�c i I tf-�at. t'r�e fee foz� r i i i nn an a�p�a1 sr�ould �e inci-�ased�� It i,�as suggested. �tE-�at tf�ier'e be a fer foi�- •,Owner� ��c:cuu i �d" anci ar�o�i��er fee uF "(�iori-4wner Uccus�� i ed�' . "fhe su��c�zst ion was d f ! at teF <�fi �25, CiU. i�lr. V i -r_r- i nu, �i:a�c.eu �i..'r��t. i;.r,e�-e i s son�e rner i t. i r� r� i s i na ti�-�e ree. Tl�ere i s � I at. c�F � i rr�r i rivo i vt�ci i n .r_,r�par•i n�� tt-�e �aE=�er- w;_>r�.. I nsP�'��►�s rear�r�n��i n�7 �:he i r� t i me so as t�� apF�ear- bProre tF-,i s Boai°d to repreSGr��t. tt��e C�i ty. AftFr mu�•1�-� cl i s�.uss i on . MGL 1 0Cl was m�de �y k�i 1 I T i i ton t.o ma!�e a request to rl��e C i ty Cour�c i i cor�s i r_iea- i ng i n�,i�eds i r�cr r.t-�e F i 1 i r�� F ee tc� the �c>ard ofi Apped 1 s � Rrv i ew fz-om � 1 �J. UQ to �25 . 00 . SFC:��r�d�cf t�v Kona 1 d Ar�ker�:�. Mi�T I UI�i CARR I EU Ut�lAN I MOUSLY . l . A�i�r��va 1 of ti�» h�ar i nc� �r�d adv i sor�ti� ru I i i��s or" fih�: Aci Hoc meet:i r�t� of t.he Navember- 1 4. i�.�89. Mat i on rnade by RoUer't V i er i ng to appr<�ve t4�e acfi i ons ofi= the h�ar i n�7 and ad�� ; sor�v ru i i nc�s a�F� tr�e Ad Ho� me�t i nct. .�ec:onded L,y Ror� G 1 assman . I�IU�f 1��N CARR I EU LINAN I MUi15L'►' _ 2 . Appr�va l c>f= �ti�ie rn�i nutes uF t.he Uctober ! 0 , 1989 and Nov�mber 14 , I 98y rneet i r�n :�s subm i tted i r� w�, i t i na. Mat i an rnacl� by Ron G I assrr�an za approve tf�e rn i nutes of= tne Uc�toLier 1 U , i 989 rn�er i n�a as subm i t�ce�d. SPCOnded bv E3 i �I 1 T i 1 i,on. MOT I UN CAF�R I ED UNAN 1 NIOUSLY. Mo�t i on rn�de bY B i 1 I �(i 1 t��r� to appro��e tr�e m i nutes of the November- 1 4, 19i39 me�t.i na w i tti the fo 1 1 c�w i ng corr�ct i on; Or� page 2 , under "Boar-d Ac l. i on" , th i rd 1 i ne, after- tt�E date "October i . 199U , " delete the year " l9yU" an�: insert " 15y 1 " . SFCai-�d�d t�y Kona 1 ci Anker►y. MC�-i I ON CARR 1 E�J UNANIMUUSLY . ---------------------------------- / � 2