D11672 wn+t. - c�tv ci..k (�I TY O F SA I 1\'T ��A U L
Pink — Financ�D�pt.
C�nsry— D�pt.
UNY'IGN OF TFIR MAYUR �I '���
No:
• ADMINIS'IRATIVE ORDER I ,�_/1l
I3L'IX,EI'ItE�'ISIO�
Date: ��
:���ZSTR.����)��R,Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the City Charter and
based on the request of the Director of the Department of Finance & Ma.nagement Services
to amend the 19�1_budget of the reneral fund,the Director of the Department
of Finance and Management Services is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner:
Current Amended
Budget Change Budget
Department of Executive Administration
General Government Account
Retiree Insurance
GL-001-09002-0431 3,085,067.00 (15,000.00) 3,070,067.00
GL-001-09002-0219 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00
3,085,067.00 0.00 3,085,067.00
•
• .
by:Activity Manager Apprpved , yor
�
Req sted by:Depertment df or I\ � Date
�i- �.�. y�
l�f I(o��
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED *t� ♦ V 1 O 1
Finance/Risk Mana ement a� CpmmC C9r20-91
REEN SHEET �" �
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
OIl .T. Guilfoile �L92-6240 pgg�GN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR
T BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(D E) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR.
ORDER a p�qYOR(OR ASSISTANT) �
N A '
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED: '
Approval of administrative order for a budget amendment
RECOMMENDA710NS:Approve(A)or Reyect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWIN(i QUESTIONB:
_PLANNING COMMISSION �CIViI SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO `
2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF _
YES NO
_DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separats she�t end ettech to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORtUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
On August 30, 1991, MEDICA submitted a renewal packa.ge for 1992 health benefits which
included mandates unacceptable to the City. The mandates included increased costs to the
City (approximately $1,000,000) , increased out-of-pocket expenses to employees and
retirees (from $1,200 annually to a possible maximum of $6,000) , and the possibility of
MEDICA terminating '.the contract if enrollment decreased by more than 107. REBM, with full
support of the LMC ;on Health, decided to find another health care provider. This search
must be completed within a six week time frame and requires the services of the City's Risk
' nal consultant fees are estimated to be $15,000.
TA S IP APPqOVED:
The City will be able to continue to provide a health benefit package with physician
selection for its employees and retirees and assure that the carrier selected has a
well-rounded benefit packa.ge and a correct funding arrangement.
RECcIVED
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None. SEP 2 4 1991 "�►' � 0 1991
MAYOas oFFic� oFF��,i G� ��+E uiRECT�R
aE�'ART�rtENl 4F FINANCE
�NQ �iAfLAt��'��A�NT SE��/IC�S
DISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
The City will not have the expertise necessary to review benefit packa.ges and financing
management of healthcare providers.
RECEIVED
OCT 0 3 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 1 S�OOO.OO COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YE NO
FUNDING SOURCE GI+ ACTIVITY NUMBER O9OOZ
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) a
U�