D11567 White — City Clerk No D ! / ��,,,��0�
Pink — Finance Dept. f� p
Canary — Dept. Accounting Date O � �� / �
Blue — Engineer
Green — Contractor
•
CITY OF SAINT PAUL — OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
for
CONTRACT CHANGE AGREEMENT N0. 1
ADMINLSTRATIVE ORDER, Whereas, additions which proved to be necessary to the Improvement described
as Minnesota Dolomitic Limestone Quarry Blocks, Boulders, and Bench Segments for
Mears Park ,
known as C�►tract 1X- 0105C]City Project No.L89-17-1� Vetter Stone Co. ,
Contracta, is composed of the following:
1. Change Contract Amount - Deduct $62,361.00
•
deductions
ORDERED, That the City of Saint Paul, through ita Mayor, approves the foregoing 1�21�f�14�4 made in ac-
deducted from
cordance with the specifications in the sum of $ �62.361.00� said amount to be �t�deflx�o the lump sum con-
sideration named in the contract, known as contract �- 010561 credi t to•
, and which amount is to be �t�catf�el��l�tlhAC
Original Contract Sum $72,500.00 684-70201-0565-69117
Change Orders to Date -0-
Amount this Change (62,361.00)
New Contract Sum $10,139.00
APP AS T FOR
7�Z�19� Vetter Stone Co.
stant ' Contractor
�
� 19� By
x upt. o Parks & Recreat on � /
�
19
Chie Engin r Head of D ment o�n��
� Z� ig � / �-iti �i�
y/ Admini ative Assistant to th Ma or
D'uector of Com u n i ty S rv i c e s ��7 y
�� ���
� � � �� � -- iis� �
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCII DATE INITIATED N� 15 9 2?
CS Parks and Recreation 7 19 91 GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE INI INITIAUDATE
EPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
John Wi rka Don Gan �e 292-74�� pSSION CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY(DATE) NUMBER PO gUDGET DIRECTOR Q FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR.
ROUTINO
NA ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANn [G� Park Recreati on
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PA(3E3 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) R�C;�[V
ACTION RE�UESTED:
Approval of Contract Change Agreement ��L 2 � �gg�
Mears Park Limestone ���
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINCa QUESTIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contraCt for this department?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
A STAFF 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
— — YES NO
_ DISTHIC7 COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVEI YES NO
Explaln all yes answers on separate sheet and attech to preen sheet
INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What.When,Where,Why):
Contract award recommendation specified bid E at $10,139.00 plus unit bids A through D,
which allows the City to increase contract amount, if the items specified in bids R� through
D are needed. During preparation of the contract, the entire budget amount of $72,500.00
was inadvertenly typed in. The City does not anticipate using the entire budget amount of
$72,500.00 for these items at this time.
AGESIFAPPROVED:
The additional encumbered amount of $62,361.80 can be utilized for other required project
construction costs.
REC�ivEp RECEIVED
� ► � JUL 2 2 1991
DISADVANTACiES IFAPPROVED:
°����� ��= THE ���E�TOR CITY ATTORN�EY
None �'�g'�RTM�NT
, �� �������� OF FINANCE
RECEIVED ME��r SERVI�ES R,ECEIVED
JUL 3 0 1991 JUL 2 5 1991
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: ,
If the total amount o.f funds remains encumbered, other required contracts cannot be
awarded.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S �6 Z,361.OO� COST/REVENUE BUDGETER(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE 684-70201-0565-69117 ACTIVITY NUMBER C90-3R003-0882-340
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �q,�
t,U